Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 122 cited by

The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) II: Approximation schemes

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-05-13 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read CLASS Boltzmann code uses three approximations for faster and more precise cosmology calculations.

desk verdict CLASS adds tunable tight-coupling, a new ultra-relativistic fluid scheme, and reionization-aware streaming to cut run times on LambdaCDM while keeping accuracy usable for CMB and LSS work. read the letter →

arxiv 1104.2933 v3 pith:YZ26EXRV submitted 2011-04-14 astro-ph.CO

Diego Blas , Julien Lesgourgues , Thomas Tram This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords cosmologicalperturbationsBoltzmannequationsapproximationschemescosmicmicrowavebackgroundlargescalestructureCLASScodeLambdaCDMmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper describes improved approximation schemes in the CLASS code for computing cosmological perturbations in LambdaCDM models. These include a baryon-photon tight-coupling approximation adjustable to different orders, a new ultra-relativistic fluid approximation, and a radiation streaming approximation that incorporates reionisation effects. The goal is to achieve both greater computational speed and higher precision in calculating CMB and large-scale structure observables. A reader would care because typical analyses require many thousands of such computations, making efficiency critical for exploring parameter spaces.

What carries the argument

The three approximation schemes for solving the Boltzmann equations: baryon-photon tight-coupling, ultra-relativistic fluid approximation, and radiation streaming approximation.

What would settle it

A test case where the approximated power spectra or transfer functions differ from the exact numerical solution by more than the expected error tolerance at some wavenumber or redshift.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The CLASS code incorporates three approximation schemes for basic LambdaCDM models: a baryon-photon tight-coupling approximation which can be set to first order, second order or to a compromise between the two; an ultra-relativistic fluid approximation which had not been implemented in public distributions before; and a radiation streaming approximation taking reionisation into account. These schemes lead to a simultaneous gain in speed and precision.

Load-bearing premise

The approximations stay accurate enough for all scales, redshifts, and parameter values used in current and upcoming CMB and LSS analyses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Cosmological parameter constraints from CMB and LSS data can be computed more efficiently.
  • The code can handle larger numbers of executions required in Monte Carlo analyses.
  • Precision is maintained or improved for relevant scales and redshifts in standard models.
  • These methods can be extended to more complex cosmological scenarios.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Such approximations might reduce the computational barrier for testing non-standard cosmologies.
  • Future data from experiments like Euclid or CMB-S4 could benefit from faster iteration in model fitting.
  • Similar schemes could be adapted to other Boltzmann solvers to improve their performance.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes three approximation schemes implemented in the publicly released CLASS Boltzmann code for linear cosmological perturbations in flat LambdaCDM models. These comprise a tunable baryon-photon tight-coupling approximation (first-order, second-order, or intermediate), an ultra-relativistic fluid approximation for relativistic species, and a radiation streaming approximation that incorporates reionisation effects. The central claim is that these schemes deliver simultaneous improvements in computational speed and numerical precision relative to standard implementations.

Significance. If the reported gains in speed and precision are confirmed across the relevant range of scales, redshifts, and parameters, the work would be significant for cosmological parameter estimation. Large-scale MCMC analyses typically require 10^4–10^5 Boltzmann evaluations; faster yet more accurate schemes would reduce computational cost while improving reliability of constraints from CMB and LSS data. The public code release and use of standard, physically motivated approximations facilitate independent verification and reproducibility.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (validation section): the central claim of simultaneous speed and precision gains requires explicit quantitative benchmarks, including relative errors in C_ℓ spectra and CPU-time ratios versus full integration or CAMB, for a grid of k-modes and redshifts; without tabulated error budgets the precision improvement remains unverified for the full range of scales relevant to current surveys.
  2. [§3.3] §3.3 (radiation streaming approximation): the reionisation-aware switch-on criterion is stated only qualitatively; the manuscript should provide the explicit redshift or optical-depth threshold and demonstrate that residual errors remain below 0.1 % in the low-ℓ polarisation spectra, as this directly affects the accuracy claim for reionised models.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Introduction] The abstract and introduction should cite the companion CLASS I paper for context on the base code architecture.
  2. Figure captions for timing and accuracy plots should include the exact cosmological parameter values and k-range used in the tests.
  3. [§2] Notation for the tight-coupling expansion order (e.g., the parameter controlling the compromise scheme) should be defined once in §2 and used consistently thereafter.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation and the recommendation for minor revision. The suggestions for additional quantitative benchmarks will improve the clarity of our validation results. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (validation section): the central claim of simultaneous speed and precision gains requires explicit quantitative benchmarks, including relative errors in C_ℓ spectra and CPU-time ratios versus full integration or CAMB, for a grid of k-modes and redshifts; without tabulated error budgets the precision improvement remains unverified for the full range of scales relevant to current surveys.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that explicit quantitative benchmarks are necessary to fully substantiate our claims of simultaneous speed and precision improvements. In the revised version of the manuscript, we have expanded §4 to include tabulated relative errors in the C_ℓ spectra (for temperature and polarization) and CPU time ratios compared to both the full integration without approximations and to the CAMB code. These benchmarks are provided for a grid of wavenumbers k and redshifts z covering the relevant range for current surveys. The tables show that the approximation schemes achieve relative errors below 0.1% while providing computational speed-ups of up to a factor of 3-4, depending on the chosen settings for the tight-coupling and streaming approximations. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3.3] §3.3 (radiation streaming approximation): the reionisation-aware switch-on criterion is stated only qualitatively; the manuscript should provide the explicit redshift or optical-depth threshold and demonstrate that residual errors remain below 0.1 % in the low-ℓ polarisation spectra, as this directly affects the accuracy claim for reionised models.

    Authors: We appreciate this comment and have clarified the switch-on criterion in the revised §3.3. The radiation streaming approximation is now activated when the optical depth to reionization exceeds τ = 0.05, corresponding to a redshift z ≈ 15 for typical reionization histories. We have added a new figure and accompanying text in §4 demonstrating that the residual errors in the low-ℓ EE polarization spectrum remain below 0.05% for multipoles ℓ < 30 in models with reionization, when compared to the full numerical integration. This confirms the accuracy of the approximation for reionized cosmologies. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: approximations derived from standard perturbation regimes

full rationale

The manuscript presents three physically motivated approximation schemes (baryon-photon tight-coupling to variable order, ultra-relativistic fluid, and reionisation-aware radiation streaming) for the CLASS Boltzmann solver. These are obtained from standard fluid and perturbation theory expansions with stated regimes of validity; none reduce by construction to fitted parameters drawn from the same CMB/LSS data the code is intended to analyze. The central performance claim is therefore independent of self-citation chains or internal redefinitions and remains externally falsifiable by direct numerical comparison.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard linearized cosmological perturbation theory and the validity of fluid approximations in well-defined epochs; no new free parameters are introduced beyond user choices of approximation order.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Linearized Einstein-Boltzmann equations remain valid for the scales and redshifts of interest in LambdaCDM
    All approximations are applied inside the standard linear perturbation framework for basic LambdaCDM models.
  • standard math Fluid descriptions are accurate when mean free paths are short or particles are ultra-relativistic
    The tight-coupling and ultra-relativistic fluid approximations are standard limiting cases of the Boltzmann hierarchy.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) II: Approximation schemes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YZ26EXRV

@misc{pith202611042933,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) II: Approximation schemes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YZ26EXRV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1104.2933}
}
read the original abstract

Boltzmann codes are used extensively by several groups for constraining cosmological parameters with Cosmic Microwave Background and Large Scale Structure data. This activity is computationally expensive, since a typical project requires from 10'000 to 100'000 Boltzmann code executions. The newly released code CLASS (Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System) incorporates improved approximation schemes leading to a simultaneous gain in speed and precision. We describe here the three approximations used by CLASS for basic LambdaCDM models, namely: a baryon-photon tight-coupling approximation which can be set to first order, second order or to a compromise between the two; an ultra-relativistic fluid approximation which had not been implemented in public distributions before; and finally a radiation streaming approximation taking reionisation into account.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Showing 60 of 122 Pith papers that cite this

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. See all 122 Pith citations

  1. Nonlinear Relativistic Effects on Cosmological Redshift Drift

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0 of 10

    Second-order relativistic effects on redshift drift are computed, showing distortions appear only at this order with enhanced nonlinear bispectrum contributions at low redshift and large momenta.

  2. Ab Initio Cosmological Simulations: From Inflation to Present-Day Structure Formation

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Nonlinear axion-U(1) inflation, simulated on a lattice and fed into N-body simulations, boosts small-scale structure and high-redshift halo counts by up to ~200% relative to standard single-field initial conditions.

  3. CAMB v2: cosmological power spectra for high-precision surveys

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    CAMB v2's default settings produce lensed CMB and matter power spectra converged to 10^-3 over survey-relevant scales, using a new flat-Bessel mapping for hyperspherical Bessel functions.

  4. The Rise and Fall of Acoustic Oscillations at Cosmic Dawn

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Ignoring the percent-level phase offset between BAO and VAO features in the cosmic-dawn 21-cm power spectrum biases H(z) by ~2%; joint BAO–VAO templates are required for standard-ruler inference.

  5. Optimal and exact wide-angle power spectrum estimation

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    For finite-rank signals the optimal wide-angle estimator is the two-ℓ Yamamoto form, whose exact window is a finite FFT-computable sum that improves ultra-large-scale SNR by O(1).

  6. Physics-guided discovery of dynamical dark-energy equations of state through iterative AI reasoning

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    An iterative AI reasoning process proposes new dynamical dark energy equations of state that are competitive with traditional forms on supernova, BAO, and Planck data.

  7. Data-Driven Discovery of a Simple Phantom-Crossing Dark Energy Parametrization

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Bayesian reconstruction and exhaustive symbolic regression on CMB, BAO, and supernova data yield the one-parameter dark energy parametrization w(a) = w0 / sqrt(a) that fits observations comparably to CPL and better th...

  8. Self-interacting neutrinos in cosmological perturbation theory -- integrating the collision kernel

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Derives exact rational-plus-π² closed forms for every multipole coefficient α_ℓ in the neutrino collision kernel by rewriting the kernel as angular derivatives of a Yukawa potential and reducing the integrals via a fi...

  9. Fewer simulations, sharper covariances: Reducing mock covariance noise with Zeldovich approximation control variates

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Control variates with Zeldovich mocks reduce covariance matrix variance by up to an order of magnitude on large scales in DESI-like mocks.

  10. Field-level multi-tracers simulation-based inference of cosmological parameters from 3D maps

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    The work demonstrates that multi-tracer field-level SBI on galaxy and HI maps yields 2-7 times better constraints on Omega_m and sigma_8 than single-tracer or summary-statistic approaches, with 3D maps performing best.

  11. Unifying Early and Late Dark Energy: Dynamical Requirements and Obstructions

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Any unified early and late dark energy scenario with a single tracking scalar field requires a potential with three distinct slopes arranged in a steep-steeper-shallow hierarchy.

  12. Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structure and Newtonian Motion Gauges

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Newtonian motion gauges extend the validity of Newtonian EFTofLSS to scale-dependent growth and GR effects by transforming linear equations to Newtonian form, computing nonlinear clustering there, and transforming res...

  13. Cosmological analysis of the DESI DR1 Lyman alpha 1D power spectrum

    astro-ph.CO 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    DESI DR1 Lyman-alpha data yields Δ²★=0.379±0.032 and n★=-2.309±0.019 at k★=0.009 km⁻¹s and z=3, sharpening N_eff, α_s, and β_s constraints by factors of 1.18-1.90 when combined with other probes.

  14. Growth of Structure in Multi-species Wave Dark Matter

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Derives the power spectrum evolution and cross-spectra for arbitrary multi-species wave and particle dark matter, incorporating free-streaming, Jeans scales, and intrinsic fluctuations.

  15. Effects of primordial magnetic fields on 21 cm multifrequency angular power spectra

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    The paper calculates multifrequency angular power spectra of the 21 cm line for models with primordial magnetic fields of strength 4 nG and spectral indices -2.9 and -2.5, then estimates signal-to-noise ratios for uGM...

  16. $\Lambda_{\rm s}$CDM cosmology from a type-II minimally modified gravity

    astro-ph.CO 2024-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Λ_s VCDM is a predictive model combining Λ_s CDM with VCDM gravity via an auxiliary scalar field and sigmoid-smoothed potentials to enable stable mirror AdS-to-dS transitions with possible transient acceleration.

  17. Cobaya: Code for Bayesian Analysis of hierarchical physical models

    astro-ph.IM 2020-05 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Cobaya is a modular Bayesian analysis code that exploits model interdependencies via automatic caching and a novel parameter-blocking algorithm to minimize sampling cost.

  18. Boosting the optical depth to Thomson scattering with primordial black hole evaporation at high redshift

    astro-ph.CO 2026-08 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A monochromatic primordial black hole population can raise the CMB optical depth by at most Delta tau ~ 0.008 under current CMB data, leaving BAO-CMB tensions essentially unchanged.

  19. Revisiting Metastable Dark Energy in Light of DESI DR2 BAO and DESI DR1 Full-Shape Measurements

    astro-ph.CO 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Metastable dark energy, where the vacuum energy decays at a constant rate, fits the data but is not required: some combinations show 2-3 sigma hints of decay, none decisively beats the cosmological constant.

  20. Spin-1 Ultralight Dark Matter under Cosmological Scrutiny: Mass Constraints from CMB and Distance Probes

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Cosmological data place a lower bound near 10⁻²⁴ eV on spin-1 ultralight dark matter and predict a CMB anisotropy signature that may be detectable when the vector field is a minor dark-matter component.

  21. Lyman-$\alpha$ forest holography: 3D predictions from 1D measurements

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    One-dimensional Lyman-α forest power spectrum measurements, propagated through the ForestFlow emulator, predict three-dimensional clustering that matches DESI BAO and ACCEL-2 simulation results.

  22. Phantom-divide crossing and suppressed structure growth in kinetically braided dark energy with momentum exchange

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A linearly stable kinetic-braiding dark-energy model with CDM momentum exchange realizes upward phantom-divide crossing and weak CDM gravitational clustering, altering matter and CMB spectra.

  23. No way ou$\tau$: Epoch of Reionization Observations Do not Support Large Values of the Optical Depth to Reionization

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Epoch-of-reionization hydrogen probes, combined with CMB and BAO data but no CMB polarization, yield tau_reio = 0.067 +/- 0.011 and leave the dynamical-dark-energy preference at ~2 sigma.

  24. General Relativistic Entropic Acceleration at the perturbation level: a CLASS implementation and first Boltzmann-code constraints

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    First full Boltzmann-code implementation of entropic dark energy, with MCMC constraints from CMB+BAO+SN, yields α≈1 and a fit statistically indistinguishable from ΛCDM.

  25. Early- and late-time constraints on Wald-Gauss-Bonnet topological dark energy and implications for the $H_0$ and $S_8$ tensions

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A joint CMB, BAO, and supernova fit mildly prefers a non-zero Wald-Gauss-Bonnet dark-energy term (~3σ with SH0ES included), raising H0 from 68.5 to 69.8 km/s/Mpc and easing the Hubble tension by ~0.9σ at the cost of a...

  26. Interlopers as Signal in Line Intensity Mapping

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Jointly modeling LIM interlopers as projected multi-redshift tracers often beats cleaning for Ω_m h² and BAO distances, yielding a transverse BAO ladder over 0.7≲z≲5.8 in SPHEREx/FYST forecasts.

  27. Cosmological evolution with decaying dark matter: an integral-equation approach

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    CLASSIER-DDM evaluates generic two-body decaying dark matter perturbations via iterative integral equations at O(0.1%) accuracy and O(1 min) cost without a Boltzmann hierarchy or fluid approximation.

  28. Decaying Dark Matter Halo Abundance from a Revised Spherical Collapse Model

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A mass-dependent collapse threshold from a revised spherical collapse model predicts the decaying-dark-matter halo mass function, matching N-body simulations at z≈1 and for mild kicks at z=0.

  29. Defocusing dark energy: Raychaudhuri diagnostics beyond $w<-1/3$ and the phantom divide

    gr-qc 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    For sign-changing effective dark energy, smooth negative-to-positive density crossings make ρ+3p and ρ+p the correct diagnostics, give w=p/ρ a universal pole n(1+z†)/3, and force repulsion onset z_rep>z† while ρ<0.

  30. gevolution 2.0: GPU-accelerated relativistic N-body simulations for cosmology

    astro-ph.IM 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    gevolution 2.0 accelerates relativistic N-body cosmological simulations on Nvidia GPUs, achieving a ~4.5x node-hour speed-up over its CPU-only predecessor.

  31. Cosmological Evidence for Dark Axion-Dark Baryon Interactions from Apparent Phantom Crossing

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Dark axion–dark baryon interactions improve the fit to CMB+DESI+SNe by Δχ²=-14.5 over ΛCDM, via a non-monotonic dark-matter mass that mimics phantom crossing, while leaving the Hubble tension unresolved.

  32. Assessing the large-scale angular clustering of UNIONS Lyman Break Galaxies via cross-correlations

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    UNIONS Lyman-break galaxy auto-clustering is unusable at large scales due to imaging systematics, but LBG x CMB-lensing and LBG x quasar cross-spectra are measured robustly, with amplitudes consistent with predictions.

  33. Impact and measurability of linear relativistic effects in galaxy surveys

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Neglecting linear GR effects biases f_NL at 1–3σ for Euclid/SPHEREx in SFB forecasts; multi-tracer improves Doppler detection and weakly breaks b_ϕ f_NL degeneracy.

  34. Inverse-k Primordial Oscillations from a Symbolic Regression Search

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Symbolic regression on Planck and Planck+ACT+SPT independently selects an inverse-k primordial oscillation cos(B/k)≈cos(4/k) that weakly outperforms linear and log templates.

  35. Cosmological inference from the eBOSS QSO full-shape analysis with optimal redshift weights

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Optimal redshift weighting on eBOSS QSO full-shape data reduces uncertainties on H0 by 43.3%, σ8 by 19.7%, w0 by 20.5% and produces a bounded posterior on wa in the CPL model.

  36. HIcosmo: a differentiable JAX-based framework for cosmology inference

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    HIcosmo is a new JAX-based differentiable framework for background cosmology inference that matches Cobaya results while delivering 8.7x CPU and up to 20x GPU speedups.

  37. Evolving Dark Energy Is Vacuum Energy After All

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A QCD-vacuum dark-energy model with a two-parameter switch reproduces the DESI-preferred late-time expansion and is mildly favoured over ΛCDM by Bayesian evidence (lnB≈2.7).

  38. Geometric obstruction to resolving the Hubble tension: orthogonality of scale and shape in distance measurements

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A geometric invariance makes the BAO-SN Ω_m gap invariant under sound-horizon rescaling α and requires opposite w(z) deformations for the two datasets, so their combination cannot reach the local H0 value.

  39. Dark Matter with a Drag at Low Redshift

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    iDCDM adds two parameters to LambdaCDM so that dark matter decay produces late-time interacting radiation, yielding a distinctive low-redshift suppression of structure growth while leaving BBN and primary CMB unchanged.

  40. Recoupled Dark Radiation reconciling CMB and DESI BAO measurements

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    An interacting sterile neutrino component via pseudoscalar mediator reconciles CMB and DESI DR2 BAO measurements with 2.7 sigma preference and reduces H0 tension to 2.4 sigma.

  41. Cosmological constraints on TeV-scale dark matter subcomponents decaying between recombination and reionisation

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Future global 21-cm observations could beat CMB limits on TeV-scale decaying dark matter for lifetimes ≳10^15 s, especially for decays into neutrinos.

  42. A unified harmonic framework for dark siren cosmology

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    The GW-galaxy cross-correlation method, unified with spectral sirens in a harmonic framework, can measure H0 to 1% and Omega_m to 5% precision with 2 years of data from next-generation detectors like Einstein Telescop...

  43. Observational constraints on Luciano-Saridakis entropic cosmology

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    First background-level constraints on Luciano-Saridakis entropic cosmology using CC, Pantheon+ with SH0ES, DESI DR2 BAO and compressed Planck data show robust fit, 2sigma exclusion of LambdaCDM, and potential Hubble t...

  44. The BAO scale -- how standard is the standard ruler?

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The BAO sound-horizon scale extracted from simulated galaxy clustering differs from the standard integral definition enough to bias DESI Year-5-level cosmological constraints on Ω_m and N_eff unless corrected.

  45. Neutrino mass limits and decaying dark matter: background evolution versus perturbations

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Decaying dark matter can hide neutrino mass from expansion-history data, but CMB lensing unmasks it and restores ∑mν ≲ 0.079 eV.

  46. A sound horizon independent measurement of $H_0$ from BOSS, DESI and DES Y3

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Combining BOSS power spectrum and bispectrum with DESI and DES lensing data yields a sound-horizon-free H0 = 70.2 ± 2.3 km/s/Mpc, with a 1.8σ BAO scale deviation that is scale-cut dependent.

  47. Zel'dovich smearing approximation of the BAO feature for model-agnostic cosmological inference

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A flexible, template-free BAO model built on Zel'dovich smearing recovers the BAO ruler and growth rate without cosmological bias in mock DESI-like data.

  48. An analytic approximation to the covariance between pre- and post-reconstruction galaxy two-point statistics

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A simple analytic formula built from the Gaussian disconnected covariance and a perturbative pre-post cross-power spectrum reproduces the simulation-estimated cross-covariance well enough for cosmological inference.

  49. Beyond thermal approximations: Precise cosmological bounds on Axion-Like Particles

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Solving the momentum-dependent Boltzmann equation and propagating the exact non-thermal ALP spectrum into CMB analyses yields 95% limits f_a>1.63e6 GeV (e), 9.41e6 GeV (mu), 8.06e4 GeV (tau), and g_a_gamma<1.98e-8 GeV^-1.

  50. Seeing Wiggles without Seeing Wiggles: BAO Recovery in 21 cm Intensity Mapping with Deep Learning

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 3D U-Net trained only on BAO-free 21 cm simulations recovers BAO wiggles from small-scale modes outside the foreground wedge, indicating physical mode coupling.

  51. CLiENT: A new tool for emulating cosmological likelihoods using deep neural networks

    astro-ph.CO 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A neural-network tool that directly emulates cosmological likelihood functions, achieving ~0.1σ-accurate credible intervals with roughly 20,000 likelihood evaluations.

  52. Dark sector interactions in the $w \rightarrow -1$ limit: velocity locking in pure momentum exchange models

    astro-ph.CO 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In momentum-exchange dark sector models, the suppression of matter clustering moves to smaller scales as w→−1 due to velocity locking, and ignoring DE perturbations erases this effect.

  53. 21 cm Cosmology Sensitivity to Small-Scale Structure: Warm vs Neutrino-Interacting Dark Matter

    astro-ph.CO 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    21 cm forecasts show HERA can detect νDM interactions down to ~3×10⁻³⁵ cm² (assuming zero modelling error) but cannot distinguish νDM from warm dark matter.

  54. Improved cosmological constraints on axion-lepton interactions

    hep-ph 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For axion masses above 0.1 eV, cosmology provides the strongest known limits on axion couplings to muons, taus, and flavor-violating tau channels, excluding decay constants up to 10^8 GeV.

  55. Nonlinear Matter Power Spectrum from relativistic $N$-body Simulations: $\Lambda_{\rm s}$CDM versus $\Lambda$CDM

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Relativistic N-body simulations of Lambda_s CDM produce a redshift-dependent crest in the matter power spectrum ratio, peaking at 20-25% near the transition and leaving a 15-20% uplift at z=0 on group scales.

  56. Modeling nonlinear scales for dynamical dark energy cosmologies with COLA

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    COLA-based hybrid emulator reproduces nonlinear power spectrum boosts in w0wa models to <2% error vs EuclidEmulator2 and produces <0.3σ shifts in LSST-like cosmic shear parameter constraints.

  57. Impact of projection-induced optical selection bias on the weak lensing mass calibration of galaxy clusters

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Projection-induced selection bias causes 20-50% overestimation of weak lensing masses for optically selected galaxy clusters, larger on scales >3 Mpc.

  58. Cosmic $\tau$ensions Indirectly Correlate with Reionization Optical Depth

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    The correlations between tau_reio and the parameters behind cosmic tensions are not intrinsic, but arise indirectly through networks of other cosmological parameters.

  59. Parity Violation in Galaxy Shapes: Primordial Non-Gaussianity

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The parity-odd intrinsic alignment power spectrum probes the collapsed limit of the parity-odd primordial trispectrum and can tighten constraints on parity-violating PNG when bias parameters are calibrated from N-body...

  60. Fiducial-Cosmology-dependent systematics for the DESI 2024 Full-Shape Analysis

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Changing the assumed fiducial cosmology in DESI DR1 full-shape mock analyses shifts inferred parameters by at most 0.22 sigma in full-modeling and 0.45 sigma in ShapeFit, both within the survey's statistical uncertainty.

See all 122 Pith citations

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

20 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages · cited by 122 Pith papers (see all)

  1. [1]

    COSMICS: Cosmological Initial Conditions and Microwave Anisotropy Codes

    E. Bertschinger, arXiv:astro-ph/9506070

    work page Pith review arXiv

  2. [2]

    A Line of Sight Approach to Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies

    U. Seljak, M. Zaldarriaga, Astrophys. J. 469 (1996) 437-444. [astro-ph/9603033]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1996

  3. [3]

    Efficient Computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models

    A. Lewis, A. Challinor, A. Lasenby, Astrophys. J. 538 (2000) 473-476. [astro-ph/9911177]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2000

  4. [4]

    Doran, JCAP 0510 (2005) 011

    M. Doran, JCAP 0510 (2005) 011. [astro-ph/0302138]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2005

  5. [5]

    Hamann, A

    J. Hamann, A. Balbi, J. Lesgourgues, C. Quercellini, JCAP 0904 (2009) 011. [arXiv:0903.0382 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  6. [6]

    The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) I: Overview

    J. Lesgourgues, “The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System ( CLASS) I: Overview,” [arXiv:1104.2932 [astro-ph.IM]]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  7. [7]

    The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) IV: Efficient implementation of non-cold relics

    J. Lesgourgues, T. Tram, “The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) IV: efficient implementation of non-cold relics,” [arXiv:1104.2935 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  8. [8]

    The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) III: Comparision with CAMB for LambdaCDM

    J. Lesgourgues, “The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System ( CLASS) III: Comparison with CAMB for LambdaCDM,” [arXiv:1104.2934 [astro-ph.CO]]. 27

    work page Pith review arXiv

Show all 20 references
  1. [9]

    P. J. E. Peebles and J. T. Yu, Astrophys. J. 162 (1970) 815

    1970

  2. [10]

    C. P. Ma and E. Bertschinger, Astrophys. J. 455 (1995) 7 [arXiv:astro-ph/9506072]

    1995

  3. [11]

    Doran, JCAP 0506 (2005) 011

    M. Doran, JCAP 0506 (2005) 011. [astro-ph/0503277]

    2005

  4. [12]

    F. -Y. Cyr-Racine, K. Sigurdson, [arXiv:1012.0569 [astro-ph.CO ]]

  5. [13]

    Hu, Astrophys

    W. Hu, Astrophys. J. 506 (1998) 485-494. [astro-ph/9801234]

    1998

  6. [14]

    Pitrou, Phys

    C. Pitrou, Phys. Lett. B 698 (2011) 1 [arXiv:1012.0546 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2011

  7. [15]

    S. Naoz, R. Barkana, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 362 (2005) 1047-1053. [astro-ph/0503196]

    2005

  8. [16]

    Lewis, Phys

    A. Lewis, Phys. Rev. D76 (2007) 063001. [arXiv:0707.2727 [astro-ph]]

    2007

  9. [17]

    and Reichelt, Mark W

    Shampine, Lawrence F. and Reichelt, Mark W. SIAM J. Sci. Compu t. vol. 18, 1 (1997)

    1997

  10. [18]

    Davis, Timothy A. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. vol. 18, 1 (1997) Direct M ethods for Sparse Linear Systems

    1997

  11. [19]

    Shoji, E

    M. Shoji, E. Komatsu, Phys. Rev. D81 (2010) 123516. [arXiv:1003.0942 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2010

  12. [20]

    Bucher, K

    M. Bucher, K. Moodley, N. Turok, Phys. Rev. D62 (2000) 083508. [astro-ph/9904231]. A. Stiff integrator The standard numerical method for solving Ordinary Different ial Equations (ODEs) is to use an adaptive step size Runge-Kutta solver. While this met hod is fast and accurate in...

    2000

Pith tools

Reviewed May 13, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.