Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 2 minor 6 cited by

A finite temperature cosmological bath enhances the evaporation rate of primordial black holes.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Thermal bath corrections derived via thermofield dynamics enhance the evaporation rate of primordial black holes, shortening their lifetimes relative to zero-temperature calculations.

T0 review reviewed 2026-05-17 challenge →

load-bearing objection TFD gives a clean way to dress the Hawking spectrum with bath temperature for Kerr holes, but the claim of faster PBH evaporation in reheating rests on an incomplete net-flux calculation. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2512.07284 v2 submitted 2025-12-08 hep-th astro-ph.COgr-qc

Evaporation of Primordial Black Holes in a Thermal Universe: A Thermofield Dynamics Approach

classification hep-th astro-ph.COgr-qc
keywords primordial black holesHawking radiationthermofield dynamicsthermal correctionsreheating eraevaporation rateKerr black holesearly universe
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper uses thermofield dynamics to examine Hawking radiation when black holes sit in a thermal bath rather than empty space. Emitted particles interact with and thermalize in the bath, which alters the occupation numbers in the radiation spectrum. When the same method is applied to the hot background that follows inflation, the corrections raise the evaporation rate for primordial black holes. Their lifetimes therefore become shorter than the standard zero-temperature result, with direct consequences for early-universe cosmology.

Core claim

Employing thermofield dynamics in asymptotically flat geometries, the authors obtain modified occupation numbers for Hawking particles that depend on both the black-hole temperature and the temperature of the surrounding cosmological bath; these corrections increase the emission rate, shortening the lifetime of primordial black holes in the reheating era after inflation.

What carries the argument

Thermofield dynamics formalism that supplies temperature-dependent corrections to the Hawking occupation numbers for particles interacting with an ambient thermal bath.

Load-bearing premise

The particles emitted by Hawking radiation thermalize with the surrounding cosmological thermal bath.

What would settle it

An observation or calculation demonstrating that the evaporation rate of a black hole stays identical when placed in a thermal bath whose temperature is comparable to the black-hole temperature.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Primordial black holes evaporate faster in the thermal bath of the reheating universe than they do in the zero-temperature vacuum.
  • The size of the correction depends on the relative sizes of the black-hole temperature and the bath temperature.
  • The modified spectrum applies to both Schwarzschild and Kerr black holes in asymptotically flat spacetimes.
  • The shortened lifetimes produce observable cosmological consequences during the early universe.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Existing bounds on primordial black hole abundance derived from evaporation signatures may require adjustment once thermal-bath effects are included.
  • Similar corrections could appear in other hot environments, such as black holes immersed in the cosmic microwave background at later epochs.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies Thermofield Dynamics (TFD) to derive modified occupation numbers for Hawking radiation from Schwarzschild and Kerr black holes immersed in a cosmological thermal bath. It then considers primordial black holes in the reheating era after inflation and concludes that the thermal corrections enhance the evaporation rate relative to the vacuum case, shortening PBH lifetimes and producing cosmological consequences.

Significance. If the central claim of enhanced net evaporation were to hold after proper accounting of absorption, the result would affect constraints on PBH masses, their role as dark matter candidates, and possible early-universe signals. The explicit construction of TFD-modified spectra for asymptotically flat geometries constitutes a technical contribution that could be reusable in other thermal-field settings on curved backgrounds.

major comments (1)
  1. [Application to the early-universe reheating scenario] In the application to PBH evaporation during reheating (the section following the derivation of the modified spectrum), the assertion that the TFD correction enhances the evaporation rate considers only the outgoing flux. The net energy-loss rate must instead be computed as the difference between emission and absorption; by detailed balance the absorption cross-section equals the emission greybody factor, yielding a net rate ∫ ω Γ(ω) [n_TFD(ω) − n_bath(ω)] dω (up to redshift). This net rate is strictly smaller than the vacuum case for any positive bath temperature and vanishes when T_bath = T_BH. The shortened-lifetime conclusion therefore rests on an incomplete flux balance.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that emitted particles 'interact with the thermal background and thermalize' without indicating how this assumption is implemented inside the TFD calculation or how it affects the Bogoliubov coefficients.
  2. [TFD formalism and modified occupation numbers] Notation for the two temperatures (black-hole temperature versus bath temperature) should be introduced with a single consistent symbol pair and used uniformly in all subsequent equations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comment on the net evaporation rate in the reheating scenario. We address this point directly below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate a more complete treatment.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: In the application to PBH evaporation during reheating (the section following the derivation of the modified spectrum), the assertion that the TFD correction enhances the evaporation rate considers only the outgoing flux. The net energy-loss rate must instead be computed as the difference between emission and absorption; by detailed balance the absorption cross-section equals the emission greybody factor, yielding a net rate ∫ ω Γ(ω) [n_TFD(ω) − n_bath(ω)] dω (up to redshift). This net rate is strictly smaller than the vacuum case for any positive bath temperature and vanishes when T_bath = T_BH. The shortened-lifetime conclusion therefore rests on an incomplete flux balance.

    Authors: We agree that a proper accounting of the net energy-loss rate requires subtracting the absorption contribution from the bath. Our TFD derivation yields a modified occupation number n_TFD(ω) that incorporates thermal corrections to the standard Hawking spectrum arising from the interaction with the ambient bath. In the revised manuscript we will explicitly evaluate the net rate ∫ ω Γ(ω) [n_TFD(ω) − n_bath(ω)] dω for the reheating-era parameters. Because the TFD corrections increase n_TFD(ω) relative to the vacuum Hawking distribution, the difference n_TFD(ω) − n_bath(ω) remains larger than the vacuum n_H(ω) over the relevant frequency range when T_BH ≫ T_bath (the regime applicable to evaporating PBHs). Consequently the net evaporation rate is still enhanced compared with the T_bath = 0 case, shortening PBH lifetimes. We will also add a brief discussion of the equilibrium limit where the net rate vanishes at T_bath = T_BH. These changes will be presented in an updated version of the cosmological-consequences section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: TFD derivation of modified Hawking occupation numbers is externally grounded

full rationale

The paper applies the standard external Thermofield Dynamics formalism to derive modified occupation numbers for Hawking radiation in a thermal bath for Schwarzschild and Kerr geometries. The central steps rely on TFD methods from thermal QFT rather than any self-referential definitions, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the result to its inputs. The application to PBH evaporation in the reheating era follows directly from the derived spectrum corrections without evidence of the derivation chain collapsing by construction. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks for the TFD step.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability of thermofield dynamics to Hawking radiation in thermal baths and the thermalization of emitted particles with the cosmological background; no free parameters or invented entities are identifiable from the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Thermofield Dynamics provides a valid real-time formalism for modifying Hawking occupation numbers in the presence of a finite-temperature bath for asymptotically flat spacetimes.
    Invoked to derive the corrected spectrum for Schwarzschild and Kerr geometries.
  • domain assumption Emitted particles thermalize with the ambient bath, producing a modified Hawking spectrum whose net effect increases the evaporation rate.
    Key step linking TFD corrections to enhanced PBH evaporation in the reheating era.

reviewed 2026-05-17 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Evaporation of Primordial Black Holes in a Thermal Universe: A Thermofield Dynamics Approach." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2512.07284

@misc{pith2026251207284,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Evaporation of Primordial Black Holes in a Thermal Universe: A Thermofield Dynamics Approach},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2512.07284}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.07284}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We investigate the impact of a finite temperature environment on the Hawking radiation from black holes (BHs), with particular focus on Kerr BHs immersed in a cosmological thermal bath. The emitted particles from BHs interact with the thermal background and thermalize, leading to a modification in the Hawking radiation spectrum. By employing the methods of Thermofield Dynamics (TFD), a real time formalism of thermal quantum field theory, we derive the modified occupation numbers of the Hawking spectrum for asymptotically flat spacetimes like the Schwarzschild and the Kerr geometries. These corrections depend on the interplay between the BH temperature and the ambient bath temperature. We apply this formalism in the early universe reheating background scenario arising after inflation and demonstrate that the thermal correction to Hawking spectrum enhances the evaporation rate of primordial black holes (PBHs). As a result, the lifetime of PBH shortens compared to the zero temperature vacuum and leads to interesting cosmological consequences.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Primordial Black Hole mass growth from neutrinos during the radiation era

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    PBHs of ~1e3–1e7 solar masses can significantly grow by absorbing neutrinos before matter-radiation equality.

  2. Primordial Black Hole mass growth from neutrinos during the radiation era

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5

    Neutrino absorption lets intermediate-mass and supermassive primordial black holes grow during the radiation era, shifting thermal-history peaks and raising f_PBH.

  3. Thermal bath induced suppression of Hawking radiation

    gr-qc 2026-07 reject novelty 5.0

    A Schwarzschild black hole coupled bilinearly to an environmental scalar field radiates less than Hawking's prediction, according to a semiclassical Keldysh calculation.

  4. Electromagnetic Signatures From Primordial Black Holes in the Solar System

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Calculations show AMEGO-X could detect PBH transits within 0.1 AU of Earth while HAWC and LHAASO could see explosions out to 0.1-0.5 pc, with future 1000 AU bursts potentially yielding measurable EM signals unlike the...

  5. Electromagnetic Signatures From Primordial Black Holes in the Solar System

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Calculations indicate AMEGO-X could detect PBH transits within 0.1 AU while HAWC and LHAASO could observe explosions out to 0.1-0.5 pc, with future events at ~1000 AU potentially producing measurable electromagnetic s...

  6. Inflaton Accretion onto Primordial Black Holes During Reheating

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Inflaton accretion during reheating drives non-linear PBH mass growth that extends lifetimes and amplifies emitted SGWB by multiple orders of magnitude.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 92 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers · 29 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Black holes in the early Universe,

    B. J. Carr and S. W. Hawking, “Black holes in the early Universe,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.168, 399–416 (1974)

  2. [2]

    Primordial black hole formation and abundance: contribution from the non-linear relation between the density and curvature perturbation

    S. Young, I. Musco and C. T. Byrnes, “Primordial black hole formation and abundance: contribution from the non-linear relation between the density and curvature perturbation,” JCAP11, 012 (2019) [arXiv:1904.00984 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

  3. [3]

    Primordial Black Hole Formation during the QCD Epoch

    K. Jedamzik, “Primordial black hole formation during the QCD epoch,” Phys. Rev. D55, 5871-5875 (1997) [arXiv:astro-ph/9605152 [astro-ph]] [INSPIRE]

  4. [4]

    Formation of intermediate-mass black holes as primordial black holes in the inflationary cosmology with running spectral index

    T. Kawaguchi, M. Kawasaki, T. Takayama, M. Yamaguchi and J. Yokoyama, “Formation of intermediate-mass black holes as primordial black holes in the inflationary cosmology with running spectral index,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.388, 1426-1432 (2008) [arXiv:0711.3886 [astro-ph]] [INSPIRE]

  5. [5]

    Primordial black holes under the double inflationary power spectrum

    H. I. Kim, “Primordial black holes under the double inflationary power spectrum,” Phys. Rev. D62, 063504 (2000) [arXiv:astro-ph/9907372 [astro-ph]] [INSPIRE]

  6. [6]

    Primordial black hole formation from a nonspherical density profile with a misaligned deformation tensor

    C. M. Yoo, “Primordial black hole formation from a nonspherical density profile with a misaligned deformation tensor,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.4, 043526 (2024) [arXiv:2403.11147 [gr-qc]] [INSPIRE]

  7. [7]

    The Basics of Primordial Black Hole Formation and Abundance Estimation,

    C. M. Yoo, “The Basics of Primordial Black Hole Formation and Abundance Estimation,” Galaxies10, no.6, 112 (2022) [arXiv:2211.13512 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

  8. [8]

    PBH formation from spherically symmetric hydrodynamical perturbations: a review

    A. Escriv` a, “PBH Formation from Spherically Symmetric Hydrodynamical Perturbations: A Review,” Universe8, no.2, 66 (2022) [arXiv:2111.12693 [gr-qc]] [INSPIRE]

  9. [9]

    Primordial Black Hole Formation during First-Order Phase Transitions

    K. Jedamzik and J. C. Niemeyer, “Primordial black hole formation during first order phase transitions,” Phys. Rev. D59, 124014 (1999) [arXiv:astro-ph/9901293 [astro-ph]] [INSPIRE]

  10. [10]

    and Breitbach, Moritz and Kopp, Joachim and Mittnacht, Lukas

    M. J. Baker, M. Breitbach, J. Kopp and L. Mittnacht, “Primordial black holes from first-order cosmological phase transitions,” Phys. Lett. B868, 139625 (2025) [arXiv:2105.07481 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

  11. [11]

    Primordial black holes from strong first-order phase transitions,

    M. Lewicki, P. Toczek and V. Vaskonen, “Primordial black holes from strong first-order phase transitions,” JHEP09, 092 (2023) [arXiv:2305.04924 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

  12. [12]

    Primordial black hole formation during the QCD phase transition: threshold, mass distribution and abundance

    I. Musco, K. Jedamzik and S. Young, “Primordial black hole formation during the QCD phase transition: Threshold, mass distribution, and abundance,” Phys. Rev. D109, no.8, 8 (2024) [arXiv:2303.07980 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

  13. [13]

    Flores, A

    M. M. Flores, A. Kusenko and M. Sasaki, “Revisiting formation of primordial black holes in a supercooled first-order phase transition,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.1, 015005 (2024) [arXiv:2402.13341 [hep-ph]] [INSPIRE]

  14. [14]

    Gonçalves, A

    D. Gon¸ calves, A. Kaladharan and Y. Wu, “Primordial black holes from first-order phase transition in the singlet-extended SM,” Phys. Rev. D111, no.3, 035009 (2025) [arXiv:2406.07622 [hep-ph]] [INSPIRE]

  15. [15]

    New thresholds for Primordial Black Hole formation during the QCD phase transition,

    J. L. G. Sobrinho, P. Augusto and A. L. Gon¸ calves, “New thresholds for Primordial Black Hole formation during the QCD phase transition,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.463, no.3, 2348-2357 (2016) [arXiv:1609.01205 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

  16. [16]

    Constraints on Primordial Black Holes From Big Bang Nucleosynthesis Revisited,

    C. Keith, D. Hooper, N. Blinov and S. D. McDermott, “Constraints on Primordial Black – 35 – Holes From Big Bang Nucleosynthesis Revisited,” Phys. Rev. D102, no.10, 103512 (2020) [arXiv:2006.03608 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

  17. [17]

    Conzinu and G

    P. Conzinu and G. Marozzi, “Primordial black holes formation in an early matter dominated era from the pre-big-bang scenario,” Phys. Rev. D108, no.4, 043533 (2023) [arXiv:2305.01430 [gr-qc]] [INSPIRE]

  18. [18]

    Constraining F(R) bouncing cosmologies through primordial black holes,

    S. Banerjee, T. Papanikolaou and E. N. Saridakis, “Constraining F(R) bouncing cosmologies through primordial black holes,” Phys. Rev. D106, no.12, 124012 (2022) [arXiv:2206.01150 [gr-qc]] [INSPIRE]

  19. [19]

    Primordial Black Holes: sirens of the early Universe,

    A. M. Green, “Primordial Black Holes: sirens of the early Universe,” Fundam. Theor. Phys. 178, 129-149 (2015) [arXiv:1403.1198 [gr-qc]] [INSPIRE]

  20. [20]

    Primordial black holes and their gravitational-wave signatures

    E. Baguiet al.[LISA Cosmology Working Group], “Primordial black holes and their gravitational-wave signatures,” Living Rev. Rel.28, no.1, 1 (2025) [arXiv:2310.19857 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

  21. [21]

    Primordial black hole reformation in the early Universe,

    T. Kim and P. Lu, “Primordial black hole reformation in the early Universe,” Phys. Lett. B 865, 139488 (2025) [arXiv:2411.07469 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

  22. [22]

    The Primordial Black Hole Mass Range

    P. H. Frampton, “The Primordial Black Hole Mass Range,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A31, no.12, 1650064 (2016) [arXiv:1511.08801 [gr-qc]] [INSPIRE]

  23. [23]

    On Mass Spectra of Primordial Black Holes,

    A. A. Kirillov and S. G. Rubin, “On Mass Spectra of Primordial Black Holes,” Front. Astron. Space Sci.8, 777661 (2021) [arXiv:2109.02446 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

  24. [24]

    Primordial Black Holes

    M. Y. Khlopov, “Primordial Black Holes,” Res. Astron. Astrophys.10, 495-528 (2010) [arXiv:0801.0116 [astro-ph]] [INSPIRE]

  25. [25]

    De Luca, G

    V. De Luca, G. Franciolini and A. Riotto, “On the primordial black hole mass function for broad spectra,” Phys. Lett. B807, 135550 (2020) [arXiv:2001.04371 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

  26. [26]

    S. W. Hawking,Particle Creation by Black Holes,Commun. Math. Phys.43(1975) 199

  27. [27]

    Primordial Black Holes from Thermal Inflation,

    K. Dimopoulos, T. Markkanen, A. Racioppi and V. Vaskonen, “Primordial Black Holes from Thermal Inflation,” JCAP07, 046 (2019) [arXiv:1903.09598 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

  28. [28]

    Formation of hot spots around small primordial black holes,

    M. He, K. Kohri, K. Mukaida and M. Yamada, “Formation of hot spots around small primordial black holes,” JCAP01, 027 (2023) [arXiv:2210.06238 [hep-ph]] [INSPIRE]

  29. [29]

    Hamaide, L

    L. Hamaide, L. Heurtier, S. Q. Hu and A. Cheek, “Primordial black holes are true vacuum nurseries,” Phys. Lett. B856, 138895 (2024) [arXiv:2311.01869 [hep-ph]] [INSPIRE]

  30. [30]

    Inflaton Oscillations and Post-Inflationary Reheating

    M. A. G. Garcia, K. Kaneta, Y. Mambrini and K. A. Olive, “Inflaton Oscillations and Post-Inflationary Reheating,” JCAP04, 012 (2021) [arXiv:2012.10756 [hep-ph]] [INSPIRE]

  31. [31]

    Higgs boson induced reheating and ultraviolet frozen-in dark matter,

    A. Ahmed, B. Grzadkowski and A. Socha, “Higgs boson induced reheating and ultraviolet frozen-in dark matter,” JHEP02, 196 (2023) [arXiv:2207.11218 [hep-ph]] [INSPIRE]

  32. [32]

    Haque, D

    M. R. Haque, D. Maity and R. Mondal, “WIMPs, FIMPs, and Inflaton phenomenology via reheating, CMB and ∆N ef f,” JHEP09, 012 (2023) [arXiv:2301.01641 [hep-ph]] [INSPIRE]

  33. [33]

    Reheating in two-sector cosmology,

    P. Adshead, P. Ralegankar and J. Shelton, “Reheating in two-sector cosmology,” JHEP08, 151 (2019) [arXiv:1906.02755 [hep-ph]] [INSPIRE]

  34. [34]

    Thermo field dynamics,

    Y. Takahashi and H. Umezawa, “Thermo field dynamics,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. B10, 1755-1805 (1996) [INSPIRE]. – 36 –

  35. [35]

    Das,Finite temperature field theory, World Scientific (1997) [INSPIRE]

    A. Das,Finite temperature field theory, World Scientific (1997) [INSPIRE]

  36. [36]

    Thermo Field Dynamics in Interaction Representation,

    H. Matsumoto, Y. Nakano, H. Umezawa, F. Mancini and M. Marinaro, “Thermo Field Dynamics in Interaction Representation,” Prog. Theor. Phys.70, 599-602 (1983) [INSPIRE]

  37. [37]

    An introduction to thermal field theory and some of its application,

    M. G. Mustafa, “An introduction to thermal field theory and some of its application,” Eur. Phys. J. ST232, no.9, 1369-1457 (2023) [arXiv:2207.00534 [hep-ph]] [INSPIRE]

  38. [38]

    Thermofield dynamics and Gravity

    V. P. Nair, “Thermofield dynamics and Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D92, 104009 (2015) [arXiv:1508.00171 [hep-th]] [INSPIRE]

  39. [39]

    Umezawa, H

    H. Umezawa, H. Matsumoto, and M. Tachiki,Thermo Field Dynamics and Condensed States, North-Holland, 1982

  40. [40]

    Gauge Fields at Finite Temperatures: Thermo Field Dynamics, KMS Condition and their Extension to Gauge Theories,

    I. Ojima, “Gauge Fields at Finite Temperatures: Thermo Field Dynamics, KMS Condition and their Extension to Gauge Theories,” Annals Phys.137, 1 (1981) [INSPIRE]

  41. [41]

    Reheating after Inflation

    L. Kofman, A. D. Linde and A. A. Starobinsky, “Reheating after inflation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3195-3198 (1994) [arXiv:hep-th/9405187 [hep-th]] [INSPIRE]

  42. [42]

    Towards the Theory of Reheating After Inflation

    L. Kofman, A. D. Linde and A. A. Starobinsky, “Towards the theory of reheating after inflation,” Phys. Rev. D56, 3258-3295 (1997) [arXiv:hep-ph/9704452 [hep-ph]] [INSPIRE]

  43. [43]

    Inflation Dynamics and Reheating

    B. A. Bassett, S. Tsujikawa and D. Wands, “Inflation dynamics and reheating,” Rev. Mod. Phys.78, 537-589 (2006) [arXiv:astro-ph/0507632 [astro-ph]] [INSPIRE]

  44. [44]

    Reheating in Inflationary Cosmology: Theory and Applications

    R. Allahverdi, R. Brandenberger, F. Y. Cyr-Racine and A. Mazumdar, “Reheating in Inflationary Cosmology: Theory and Applications,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.60, 27-51 (2010) [arXiv:1001.2600 [hep-th]] [INSPIRE]

  45. [45]

    Particle production and reheating in the inflationary universe

    I. G. Moss and C. M. Graham, “Particle production and reheating in the inflationary universe,” Phys. Rev. D78, 123526 (2008) [arXiv:0810.2039 [hep-ph]] [INSPIRE]

  46. [46]

    Universe Reheating after Inflation

    Y. Shtanov, J. H. Traschen and R. H. Brandenberger, “Universe reheating after inflation,” Phys. Rev. D51, 5438-5455 (1995) [arXiv:hep-ph/9407247 [hep-ph]] [INSPIRE]

  47. [47]

    Gravitational reheating,

    M. R. Haque and D. Maity, “Gravitational reheating,” Phys. Rev. D107, no.4, 043531 (2023) [arXiv:2201.02348 [hep-ph]] [INSPIRE]

  48. [48]

    Two-phase reheating: CMB constraints on inflation and dark matter phenomenology,

    M. R. Haque, D. Maity and P. Saha, “Two-phase reheating: CMB constraints on inflation and dark matter phenomenology,” Phys. Rev. D102, no.8, 083534 (2020) [arXiv:2009.02794 [hep-th]] [INSPIRE]

  49. [49]

    Structure of Resonance in Preheating after Inflation

    P. B. Greene, L. Kofman, A. D. Linde and A. A. Starobinsky, “Structure of resonance in preheating after inflation,” Phys. Rev. D56, 6175-6192 (1997) [arXiv:hep-ph/9705347 [hep-ph]] [INSPIRE]

  50. [50]

    Nonperturbative Dynamics Of Reheating After Inflation: A Review

    M. A. Amin, M. P. Hertzberg, D. I. Kaiser and J. Karouby, “Nonperturbative Dynamics Of Reheating After Inflation: A Review,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D24, 1530003 (2014) [arXiv:1410.3808 [hep-ph]] [INSPIRE]

  51. [51]

    New cosmological constraints on primordial black holes

    B. J. Carr, K. Kohri, Y. Sendouda and J. Yokoyama, “New cosmological constraints on primordial black holes,” Phys. Rev. D81, 104019 (2010) [arXiv:0912.5297 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

  52. [52]

    Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Recent Developments

    B. Carr and F. Kuhnel, “Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Recent Developments,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.70, 355-394 (2020) [arXiv:2006.02838 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

  53. [53]

    Constraints on PBH as dark matter from observations: a review,

    M. Oncins, “Constraints on PBH as dark matter from observations: a review,” [arXiv:2205.14722 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]. – 37 –

  54. [54]

    Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter

    B. Carr, F. Kuhnel and M. Sandstad, “Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter,” Phys. Rev. D94, no.8, 083504 (2016) [arXiv:1607.06077 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

  55. [55]

    Primordial Black Holes as a dark matter candidate

    A. M. Green and B. J. Kavanagh, “Primordial Black Holes as a dark matter candidate,” J. Phys. G48, no.4, 043001 (2021) [arXiv:2007.10722 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

  56. [56]

    Das, M.R

    S. Das, M. R. Haque, J. Kalita, R. Karmakar and D. Maity, “Impact of general relativistic accretion on primordial black holes,” [arXiv:2505.15419 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

  57. [57]

    D. N. Page,Particle Emission Rates from a Black Hole: Massless Particles from an Uncharged, Nonrotating Hole,Phys. Rev. D13(1976) 198 [INSPIRE]

  58. [58]

    Relationship between Hawking Radiation and Gravitational Anomalies

    S. P. Robinson and F. Wilczek, “A Relationship between Hawking radiation and gravitational anomalies,” Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 011303 (2005) [arXiv:gr-qc/0502074 [gr-qc]] [INSPIRE]

  59. [59]

    Hawking Radiation from Charged Black Holes via Gauge and Gravitational Anomalies

    S. Iso, H. Umetsu and F. Wilczek, “Hawking radiation from charged black holes via gauge and gravitational anomalies,” Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 151302 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0602146 [hep-th]] [INSPIRE]

  60. [60]

    Black Hole Evaporation in the Klein-Sauter-Heisenberg-Euler Formalism,

    T. Damour and R. Ruffini, “Black Hole Evaporation in the Klein-Sauter-Heisenberg-Euler Formalism,” Phys. Rev. D14, 332-334 (1976) [INSPIRE]

  61. [61]

    Hawking Radiation as Tunneling

    M. K. Parikh and F. Wilczek, “Hawking radiation as tunneling,” Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 5042-5045 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/9907001 [hep-th]] [INSPIRE]

  62. [62]

    Hawking radiation from dynamical horizons

    A. Chatterjee, B. Chatterjee and A. Ghosh, “Hawking radiation from dynamical horizons,” Phys. Rev. D87, no.8, 084051 (2013) [arXiv:1204.1530 [gr-qc]] [INSPIRE]

  63. [63]

    Schwarzschild, ¨Uber das Gravitationsfeld eines Massenpunktes nach der Einsteinschen Theorie,Sitzungsber

    K. Schwarzschild, ¨Uber das Gravitationsfeld eines Massenpunktes nach der Einsteinschen Theorie,Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.)(1916) 189

  64. [64]

    N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies,Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge University Press (1982) [INSPIRE]

  65. [65]

    L. E. Parker and D. Toms,Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime: Quantized Field and Gravity, Cambridge University Press (2009) [INSPIRE]

  66. [66]

    An Introduction to Black Hole Evaporation

    J. H. Traschen, “An Introduction to black hole evaporation,” [arXiv:gr-qc/0010055 [gr-qc]] [INSPIRE]

  67. [67]

    Introduction to quantum effects in gravity,

    V. Mukhanov and S. Winitzki, “Introduction to quantum effects in gravity,” Cambridge University Press, 2007 [INSPIRE]

  68. [68]

    Exact solutions of Dirac equation on a static curved space–time,

    M. D. de Oliveira and A. G. M. Schmidt, “Exact solutions of Dirac equation on a static curved space–time,” Annals Phys.401, 21-39 (2019) [INSPIRE]

  69. [69]

    Exact solution of the Dirac equation for a Coulomb and a scalar Potential in the presence of of an Aharonov-Bohm and magnetic monopole fields

    V. M. Villalba, “Exact solution of the Dirac equation for a Coulomb and a scalar potential in the presence of an Aharonov-Bohm and a magnetic monopole fields,” J. Math. Phys.36, 3332-3344 (1995) [arXiv:hep-th/9503051 [hep-th]] [INSPIRE]

  70. [70]

    The Dirac equation in Cartesian gauge,

    I. I. Cot˘ aescu, “The Dirac equation in Cartesian gauge,”arXiv: General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology, (1997).https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:14271696

  71. [71]

    Thaller,Advanced Visual Quantum Mechanics, Springer, 2005

    B. Thaller,Advanced Visual Quantum Mechanics, Springer, 2005

  72. [72]

    R. P. Kerr,Gravitational Field of a Spinning Mass as an Example of Algebraically Special Metrics,Phys. Rev. Lett.11(1963) 237 [INSPIRE]

  73. [73]

    R. H. Boyer and R. W. Lindquist,Maximal analytic extension of the Kerr metric,J. Math. Phys.8(1967) 265 [INSPIRE]. – 38 –

  74. [74]

    L. H. Ford,Quantization of a scalar field in the Kerr spacetime,Phys. Rev. D12(1975) 2963 [INSPIRE]

  75. [75]

    P. E. Falloon, P. C. Abbott and J. B. Wang,Heun functions in black hole perturbation theory,J. Phys. A36(2003) 5477 [arXiv:2411.19740] [INSPIRE]

  76. [76]

    The Solution of Dirac’s Equation in Kerr Geometry,

    S. Chandrasekhar, “The Solution of Dirac’s Equation in Kerr Geometry,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A349, 571-575 (1976) [INSPIRE]

  77. [77]

    Separability of the Neutrino Equations in a Kerr Background,

    W. Unruh, “Separability of the Neutrino Equations in a Kerr Background,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, no.20, 1265-1267 (1973) [INSPIRE]

  78. [78]

    Dirac Equation Around a Charged, Rotating Black Hole,

    D. N. Page, “Dirac Equation Around a Charged, Rotating Black Hole,” Phys. Rev. D14, 1509-1510 (1976) [INSPIRE]

  79. [79]

    Perturbations of a rotating black hole. 1. Fundamental equations for gravitational electromagnetic and neutrino field perturbations,

    S. A. Teukolsky, “Perturbations of a rotating black hole. 1. Fundamental equations for gravitational electromagnetic and neutrino field perturbations,” Astrophys. J.185, 635-647 (1973) [INSPIRE]

  80. [80]

    Kermions: quantization of fermions on Kerr space-time

    M. Casals, S. R. Dolan, B. C. Nolan, A. C. Ottewill and E. Winstanley, “Quantization of fermions on Kerr space-time,” Phys. Rev. D87, no.6, 064027 (2013) [arXiv:1207.7089 [gr-qc]] [INSPIRE]

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by grok-4.3 on May 17, 2026.