pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.10787 · v1 · submitted 2026-03-11 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc· hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Measuring neutrino mass in light of ACT DR6 and DESI DR2

Lu Feng , Tian-Nuo Li , Guo-Hong Du , Jing-Fei Zhang , Xin Zhang
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 13:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-ph
keywords neutrino massdark energy equation of stateACT DR6DESI DR2cosmological constraintsneutrino hierarchybaryon acoustic oscillations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Dark energy equation-of-state evolution sets the upper limits on total neutrino mass from ACT DR6 and DESI DR2 data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper updates constraints on the sum of neutrino masses using the latest small-scale CMB measurements from ACT DR6 and BAO data from DESI DR2, together with supernova data. It shows that these upper limits vary significantly depending on how the dark energy equation of state evolves at early times. Models with quintessence-like behavior early on, such as holographic dark energy, produce the tightest bounds, while models that allow phantom behavior at early times, such as w0waCDM, give noticeably looser bounds. Across every model tested, the inverted neutrino mass hierarchy yields weaker constraints than the normal hierarchy, and the degenerate hierarchy yields the strongest constraints. The new data combination systematically improves the overall limits compared with previous analyses.

Core claim

In the ΛCDM, wCDM, HDE, and w0waCDM models, the upper limits on ∑m_ν are governed by the evolutionary behavior of the dark energy equation of state; models with early-time quintessence features yield the most stringent constraints, whereas models allowing early-time phantom behavior result in significantly looser bounds, while a robust hierarchy dependence persists with the inverted hierarchy giving weaker constraints and the degenerate hierarchy giving the tightest constraints.

What carries the argument

The dark energy equation of state w(z) and its early-time behavior in models such as holographic dark energy and w0waCDM, which shape the cosmic expansion history and thereby control how tightly CMB and BAO data can bound the neutrino mass sum.

If this is right

  • The combination of ACT DR6 small-scale CMB data with DESI DR2 BAO measurements tightens the upper limits on ∑m_ν in every dark energy model examined.
  • The inverted neutrino mass hierarchy consistently produces weaker constraints than the normal hierarchy.
  • The degenerate neutrino mass hierarchy consistently produces the tightest constraints across all models.
  • Early-time quintessence features in the dark energy equation of state systematically yield more stringent neutrino mass bounds than early-time phantom behavior.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Resolving whether dark energy was quintessence-like or phantom-like at early times would directly sharpen or relax expectations for the smallest detectable neutrino mass.
  • The persistent hierarchy dependence suggests that future data sets may be able to test neutrino mass ordering even before a direct mass measurement is achieved.
  • These model-dependent bounds provide a concrete benchmark for how next-generation CMB and large-scale structure surveys will interact with neutrino physics.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen dark energy models correctly describe the expansion history and the ACT DR6 and DESI DR2 datasets can be combined without unaccounted systematics.

What would settle it

A future measurement of ∑m_ν that exceeds the loosest bound obtained in w0waCDM while falling below the tightest bound obtained in HDE, or any observation showing that the upper limits remain unchanged when switching between quintessence-like and phantom-like dark energy models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.10787 by Guo-Hong Du, Jing-Fei Zhang, Lu Feng, Tian-Nuo Li, Xin Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The one-dimensional marginalized posterior constraints on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The recent release of high-precision cosmological data, particularly the small-scale cosmic microwave background (CMB) measurements from ACT and baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) data from DESI, has opened a new landscape for probing the neutrino mass. In this work, we present updated constraints on the total neutrino mass, $\sum m_\nu$, and its hierarchy within the $\Lambda$CDM, $w$CDM, holographic dark energy (HDE), and $w_0w_a$CDM models, using the latest ACT DR6, DESI DR2, and DESY5 datasets. We find that the upper limits on $\sum m_\nu$ are critically governed by the evolutionary behavior of the dark energy equation of state. Specifically, models exhibiting early-time quintessence features (e.g., HDE) yield the most stringent constraints, whereas those allowing for early-time phantom behavior (e.g., $w_0w_a$CDM) result in significantly looser bounds. Despite these model-dependent variations, we observe a robust hierarchy dependence across all scenarios, where the inverted hierarchy consistently yields weaker constraints and the degenerate hierarchy consistently yields tightest constraints. Our analysis demonstrates that the improved small-scale CMB information from ACT, combined with high-precision BAO data, systematically tightens the limits on $\sum m_\nu$, providing a crucial benchmark for future neutrino mass measurement.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports updated constraints on the total neutrino mass ∑m_ν (and its hierarchy) from ACT DR6 CMB, DESI DR2 BAO, and DESY5 supernova data within ΛCDM, wCDM, HDE, and w0waCDM. It claims that the resulting 95% upper limits are governed by the early-time dark-energy equation-of-state evolution, with early-quintessence models (HDE) producing the tightest bounds and early-phantom models (w0waCDM) the loosest, while a consistent hierarchy ordering (degenerate tightest, inverted weakest) persists across all scenarios.

Significance. If the model-dependent differences are shown to arise specifically from early-time DE dynamics rather than parameter volume, the results would usefully illustrate the sensitivity of neutrino-mass limits to dark-energy assumptions when combining small-scale CMB and BAO data. The timely use of public ACT DR6 and DESI DR2 releases provides a concrete benchmark for future analyses.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §4] Abstract and §4: The central claim that upper limits on ∑m_ν are 'critically governed by the evolutionary behavior of the dark energy equation of state' (early quintessence vs. early phantom) is load-bearing but not yet isolated from the differing dimensionality of the models. HDE adds one parameter while w0waCDM adds two; the looser bounds in w0waCDM could therefore reflect enlarged degeneracy volume with ∑m_ν rather than the sign of w(z) at z≫1. Explicit comparisons (e.g., 2D posteriors of ∑m_ν versus w(z=10) or a fixed-early-w phantom variant) are required to substantiate the interpretation.
  2. [§3.2 and Table 1] §3.2 and Table 1: The priors on the DE parameters (w0, wa, or HDE parameters) and the precise data-vector cuts (multipole range for ACT DR6, scale cuts for DESI DR2) are not stated with sufficient detail to verify that the reported hierarchy dependence survives reasonable prior variations and that the ACT+DESI combination is free of unaccounted systematics.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Table 1] Table 1: All neutrino-mass limits should explicitly state the confidence level (95%) and whether they are one-sided upper bounds; the current presentation is ambiguous for some rows.
  2. [Figure 2] Figure 2: The 2D posterior contours should include at least one panel showing ∑m_ν versus a high-redshift DE parameter (e.g., w(z=10) or the HDE parameter) to visualize the claimed early-time degeneracy.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments help clarify the interpretation of our results on neutrino mass constraints and improve the presentation of methodological details. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §4] Abstract and §4: The central claim that upper limits on ∑m_ν are 'critically governed by the evolutionary behavior of the dark energy equation of state' (early quintessence vs. early phantom) is load-bearing but not yet isolated from the differing dimensionality of the models. HDE adds one parameter while w0waCDM adds two; the looser bounds in w0waCDM could therefore reflect enlarged degeneracy volume with ∑m_ν rather than the sign of w(z) at z≫1. Explicit comparisons (e.g., 2D posteriors of ∑m_ν versus w(z=10) or a fixed-early-w phantom variant) are required to substantiate the interpretation.

    Authors: We agree that isolating the role of early-time dark energy dynamics from the effects of parameter-space volume is important for strengthening the central claim. While the physical motivation for the differences (HDE driving w→0 at high redshift versus w0waCDM permitting phantom excursions) is supported by the posterior shifts we observe, we acknowledge that dimensionality differences could contribute. In the revised manuscript we will add 2D posterior contours of ∑m_ν versus w(z=10) for the w0waCDM case and introduce results from a fixed-early-w phantom variant (w_early fixed to −1.1) to directly compare against HDE. These additions will be placed in §4 and referenced in the abstract, allowing readers to assess whether the bound differences persist when early-time behavior is controlled. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3.2 and Table 1] §3.2 and Table 1: The priors on the DE parameters (w0, wa, or HDE parameters) and the precise data-vector cuts (multipole range for ACT DR6, scale cuts for DESI DR2) are not stated with sufficient detail to verify that the reported hierarchy dependence survives reasonable prior variations and that the ACT+DESI combination is free of unaccounted systematics.

    Authors: We thank the referee for noting this omission. In the revised §3.2 we will explicitly list the prior ranges adopted for w0, wa (uniform priors over [−3,1] and [−3,3] respectively), the HDE parameter c (uniform prior [0.1,1.5]), and any other DE parameters. We will also specify the exact multipole cuts applied to the ACT DR6 likelihood (600 < ℓ < 8500 for TT/TE/EE) and the k-range or scale cuts used for the DESI DR2 BAO measurements, following the public data-release recommendations. A brief robustness test under modest prior variations will be added to confirm that the reported hierarchy ordering remains stable. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in neutrino mass constraint derivation

full rationale

The paper obtains upper limits on ∑m_ν through standard Bayesian parameter estimation (MCMC sampling of likelihoods) applied to external datasets ACT DR6, DESI DR2, and DESY5 within each dark energy model. These numerical bounds are direct outputs of the data fits and are not defined by construction from the paper's own parameters or equations. Model-to-model differences in the reported limits arise from the distinct parameter spaces and expansion histories assumed, but the central results remain data-driven rather than tautological. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that collapse the claimed governance by early-time DE evolution back to the inputs are present. The analysis is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the four dark energy models span the relevant parameter space and that neutrino mass affects structure growth only through the standard suppression mechanism; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • dark energy equation-of-state parameters (w0, wa, or HDE parameters)
    These are varied in each model and directly control the reported neutrino-mass bounds.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard cosmological perturbation theory and linear growth factor apply to neutrino mass effects
    Invoked when translating neutrino mass into observable suppression of structure.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5565 in / 1320 out tokens · 54585 ms · 2026-05-15T13:10:18.074686+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Probing the small-scale primordial power spectrum via relic neutrinos and acoustic reheating

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Dissipation of small-scale primordial perturbations after neutrino decoupling cools relic neutrinos and reduces their abundance, enabling PTOLEMY to constrain the primordial curvature power spectrum to O(0.1) on scale...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

195 extracted references · 195 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 76 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A. G. Riess et al. (Supernova Search Team), Astron. J. 116, 1009 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9805201

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  2. [2]

    Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae

    S. Perlmutter et al. (Supernova Cosmology Project), Astro- phys. J. 517, 565 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9812133

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  3. [3]

    The Case for a Positive Cosmological Lambda-term

    V. Sahni and A. A. Starobinsky, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 9, 373 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9904398

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  4. [4]

    S. M. Carroll, Living Rev. Rel. 4, 1 (2001), arXiv:astro- ph/0004075

    work page arXiv 2001

  5. [5]

    The Cosmological Constant Problems (Talk given at Dark Matter 2000, February, 2000)

    S. Weinberg, in 4th International Symposium on Sources and Detection of Dark Matter in the Universe (DM 2000) (2000) pp. 18–26, arXiv:astro-ph/0005265

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  6. [6]

    Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe

    J. Frieman, M. Turner, and D. Huterer, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 46, 385 (2008), arXiv:0803.0982 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  7. [7]

    Vagnozzi, Phys

    S. Vagnozzi, Phys. Rev. D 102, 023518 (2020), arXiv:1907.07569 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    Vagnozzi, Universe 9, 393 (2023), arXiv:2308.16628 [astro- ph.CO]

    S. Vagnozzi, Universe 9, 393 (2023), arXiv:2308.16628 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    Vagnozzi, F

    S. Vagnozzi, F. Pacucci, and A. Loeb, JHEAp 36, 27 (2022), arXiv:2105.10421 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  10. [10]

    Tensions between the Early and the Late Universe

    L. Verde, T. Treu, and A. G. Riess, Nature Astron. 3, 891 (2019), arXiv:1907.10625 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    Di Valentino et al

    E. Di Valentino et al. , Astropart. Phys. 131, 102605 (2021), arXiv:2008.11284 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Di Valentino et al

    E. Di Valentino et al. , Astropart. Phys. 131, 102604 (2021), arXiv:2008.11285 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    In the Realm of the Hubble tension $-$ a Review of Solutions

    E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, S. Pan, L. Visinelli, W. Yang, A. Melchiorri, D. F. Mota, A. G. Riess, and J. Silk, Class. Quant. Grav. 38, 153001 (2021), arXiv:2103.01183 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    Vagnozzi, Phys

    S. Vagnozzi, Phys. Rev. D 104, 063524 (2021), arXiv:2105.10425 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  15. [15]

    Cosmology Intertwined: A Review of the Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Associated with the Cosmological Tensions and Anomalies

    E. Abdalla et al. , JHEAp 34, 49 (2022), arXiv:2203.06142 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics

    E. Di Valentino et al. (CosmoVerse Network), Phys. Dark Univ. 49, 101965 (2025), arXiv:2504.01669 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    E. V. Linder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 091301 (2003), arXiv:astro- 8 ph/0208512

    work page arXiv 2003

  18. [18]

    P. J. E. Peebles and B. Ratra, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 559 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0207347

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  19. [19]

    New generalized Chaplygin gas as a scheme for unification of dark energy and dark matter

    X. Zhang, F.-Q. Wu, and J. Zhang, JCAP 01, 003 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0411221

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  20. [20]

    Zhang, Phys

    X. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B 611, 1 (2005), arXiv:astro- ph/0503075

    work page arXiv 2005

  21. [21]

    Zhang, Int

    X. Zhang, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 14, 1597 (2005), arXiv:astro- ph/0504586

    work page arXiv 2005

  22. [22]

    Constraints on holographic dark energy from type Ia supernova observations

    X. Zhang and F.-Q. Wu, Phys. Rev. D 72, 043524 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0506310

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  23. [23]

    E. J. Copeland, M. Sami, and S. Tsujikawa, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15, 1753 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0603057

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  24. [24]

    B. Wang, J. Zang, C.-Y. Lin, E. Abdalla, and S. Micheletti, Nucl. Phys. B 778, 69 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0607126

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  25. [25]

    Constraints on Holographic Dark Energy from Latest Supernovae, Galaxy Clustering, and Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy Observations

    X. Zhang and F.-Q. Wu, Phys. Rev. D 76, 023502 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0701405

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  26. [26]

    Holographic Ricci dark energy: Current observational constraints, quintom feature, and the reconstruction of scalar-field dark energy

    X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 79, 103509 (2009), arXiv:0901.2262 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  27. [27]

    Revisit of the Interaction between Holographic Dark Energy and Dark Matter

    Z. Zhang, S. Li, X.-D. Li, X. Zhang, and M. Li, JCAP 06, 009 (2012), arXiv:1204.6135 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  28. [28]

    A. A. Costa, X.-D. Xu, B. Wang, E. G. M. Ferreira, and E. Abdalla, Phys. Rev. D 89, 103531 (2014), arXiv:1311.7380 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  29. [29]

    Beyond $\Lambda$CDM: Problems, solutions, and the road ahead

    P. Bull et al. , Phys. Dark Univ. 12, 56 (2016), arXiv:1512.05356 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  30. [30]

    Revisit of the interacting holographic dark energy model after Planck 2015

    L. Feng and X. Zhang, JCAP 08, 072 (2016), arXiv:1607.05567 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  31. [31]

    S. Wang, Y. Wang, and M. Li, Phys. Rept. 696, 1 (2017), arXiv:1612.00345 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  32. [32]

    Searching for sterile neutrinos in dynamical dark energy cosmologies

    L. Feng, J.-F. Zhang, and X. Zhang, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 61, 050411 (2018), arXiv:1706.06913 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [33]

    Search for sterile neutrinos in a universe of vacuum energy interacting with cold dark matter

    L. Feng, J.-F. Zhang, and X. Zhang, Phys. Dark Univ. 23, 100261 (2019), arXiv:1712.03148 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  34. [34]

    Exploring interacting holographic dark energy in a perturbed universe with parameterized post-Friedmann approach

    L. Feng, Y.-H. Li, F. Yu, J.-F. Zhang, and X. Zhang, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 865 (2018), arXiv:1807.03022 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  35. [35]

    S. Pan, W. Yang, E. Di Valentino, E. N. Saridakis, and S. Chakraborty, Phys. Rev. D 100, 103520 (2019), arXiv:1907.07540 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2019

  36. [36]

    Di Valentino, A

    E. Di Valentino, A. Melchiorri, O. Mena, S. Pan, and W. Yang, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 502, L23 (2021), arXiv:2011.00283 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    Perivolaropoulos and F

    L. Perivolaropoulos and F. Skara, New Astron. Rev. 95, 101659 (2022), arXiv:2105.05208 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  38. [38]

    Feng, R.-Y

    L. Feng, R.-Y. Guo, J.-F. Zhang, and X. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B 827, 136940 (2022), arXiv:2109.06111 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    Giar` e, M

    W. Giar` e, M. A. Sabogal, R. C. Nunes, and E. Di Valentino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 251003 (2024), arXiv:2404.15232 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Wang and Y.-S

    H. Wang and Y.-S. Piao, Phys. Lett. B 873, 140180 (2026), arXiv:2404.18579 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2026

  41. [41]

    Huang, R.-G

    L. Huang, R.-G. Cai, and S.-J. Wang, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 68, 100413 (2025), arXiv:2502.04212 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    R. Shah, P. Mukherjee, and S. Pal, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 542, 2936 (2025), arXiv:2503.21652 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Y.-H. Pang, X. Zhang, and Q.-G. Huang, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 68, 280410 (2025), arXiv:2503.21600 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    C. You, D. Wang, and T. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 112, 043503 (2025), arXiv:2504.00985 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Goswami and S

    S. Goswami and S. Das, Phys. Dark Univ. 48, 101951 (2025), arXiv:2505.16438 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Barua and S

    S. Barua and S. Desai, Phys. Dark Univ. 49, 101995 (2025), arXiv:2506.12709 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    Li and S

    J.-X. Li and S. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1308 (2025), arXiv:2506.22953 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    New Insights into Dark Energy from DESI DR2 with CMB and SNIa

    D.-C. Qiang, J.-Y. Jia, and H. Wei, (2025), arXiv:2507.09981 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    L. Feng, T. Han, J.-F. Zhang, and X. Zhang, Chin. Phys. 50, 015105 (2026), arXiv:2507.17315 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2026

  50. [50]

    van der Westhuizen, A

    M. van der Westhuizen, A. Abebe, and E. Di Valentino, Phys. Dark Univ. 50, 102121 (2025), arXiv:2509.04496 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    L. W. K. Goh and A. N. Taylor, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 3142, 3157 (2025), arXiv:2509.12335 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Beyond CPL: Evidence for dynamical dark energy in three-parameter models

    S. Alam and M. W. Hossain, (2025), arXiv:2510.03779 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Revisiting the Hubble tension problem in the framework of holographic dark energy

    J.-X. Li and S. Wang, (2025), arXiv:2511.09467 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Z. Zhu, Q. Jiang, Y. Liu, P. Wu, and N. Liang, JHEAp 51, 100534 (2026), arXiv:2511.16032 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2026

  55. [55]

    Massive neutrinos and cosmology

    J. Lesgourgues and S. Pastor, Phys. Rept. 429, 307 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0603494

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  56. [56]

    Neutrinos in the holographic dark energy model: constraints from latest measurements of expansion history and growth of structure

    J.-F. Zhang, M.-M. Zhao, Y.-H. Li, and X. Zhang, JCAP 04, 038 (2015), arXiv:1502.04028 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  57. [57]

    Observational constraints on varying neutrino-mass cosmology

    C.-Q. Geng, C.-C. Lee, R. Myrzakulov, M. Sami, and E. N. Saridakis, JCAP 01, 049 (2016), arXiv:1504.08141 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  58. [58]

    Galaxy clustering, CMB and supernova data constraints on $\phi$CDM model with massive neutrinos

    Y. Chen and L. Xu, Phys. Lett. B 752, 66 (2016), arXiv:1507.02008 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  59. [59]

    Towards a cosmological neutrino mass detection

    R. Allison, P. Caucal, E. Calabrese, J. Dunkley, and T. Louis, Phys. Rev. D 92, 123535 (2015), arXiv:1509.07471 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  60. [60]

    Impacts of dark energy on weighing neutrinos after Planck 2015

    X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 93, 083011 (2016), arXiv:1511.02651 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  61. [61]

    A. J. Cuesta, V. Niro, and L. Verde, Phys. Dark Univ. 13, 77 (2016), arXiv:1511.05983 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  62. [62]

    Constraints on the neutrino mass and mass hierarchy from cosmological observations

    Q.-G. Huang, K. Wang, and S. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 489 (2016), arXiv:1512.05899 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  63. [63]

    Y. Chen, B. Ratra, M. Biesiada, S. Li, and Z.-H. Zhu, As- trophys. J. 829, 61 (2016), arXiv:1603.07115 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  64. [64]

    Constraining the time evolution of dark energy, curvature and neutrino properties with cosmic chronometers

    M. Moresco, R. Jimenez, L. Verde, A. Cimatti, L. Pozzetti, C. Maraston, and D. Thomas, JCAP 12, 039 (2016), arXiv:1604.00183 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  65. [65]

    On the improvement of cosmological neutrino mass bounds

    E. Giusarma, M. Gerbino, O. Mena, S. Vagnozzi, S. Ho, and K. Freese, Phys. Rev. D 94, 083522 (2016), arXiv:1605.04320 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  66. [66]

    J. Lu, M. Liu, Y. Wu, Y. Wang, and W. Yang, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 679 (2016), arXiv:1606.02987 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  67. [67]

    Impacts of dark energy on weighing neutrinos: mass hierarchies considered

    S. Wang, Y.-F. Wang, D.-M. Xia, and X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 94, 083519 (2016), arXiv:1608.00672 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  68. [68]

    Constraining neutrino mass and extra relativistic degrees of freedom in dynamical dark energy models using Planck 2015 data in combination with low-redshift cosmological probes: basic extensions to $\Lambda$CDM cosmology

    M.-M. Zhao, Y.-H. Li, J.-F. Zhang, and X. Zhang, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 469, 1713 (2017), arXiv:1608.01219 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  69. [69]

    Probing the interaction between dark matter and dark energy in the presence of massive neutrinos

    S. Kumar and R. C. Nunes, Phys. Rev. D 94, 123511 (2016), arXiv:1608.02454 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  70. [70]

    Detecting the Neutrinos Mass Hierarchy from Cosmological Data

    L. Xu and Q.-G. Huang, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 61, 039521 (2018), arXiv:1611.05178 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  71. [71]

    Unveiling $\nu$ secrets with cosmological data: neutrino masses and mass hierarchy

    S. Vagnozzi, E. Giusarma, O. Mena, K. Freese, M. Gerbino, S. Ho, and M. Lattanzi, Phys. Rev. D 96, 123503 (2017), arXiv:1701.08172 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  72. [72]

    Weighing neutrinos in the scenario of vacuum energy interacting with cold dark matter: application of the parameterized post-Friedmann approach

    R.-Y. Guo, Y.-H. Li, J.-F. Zhang, and X. Zhang, JCAP 05, 040 (2017), arXiv:1702.04189 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  73. [73]

    Weighing neutrinos in dynamical dark energy models

    X. Zhang, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 60, 060431 (2017), arXiv:1703.00651 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  74. [74]

    E.-K. Li, H. Zhang, M. Du, Z.-H. Zhou, and L. Xu, JCAP 08, 042 (2018), arXiv:1703.01554 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  75. [75]

    W. Yang, R. C. Nunes, S. Pan, and D. F. Mota, Phys. Rev. D 95, 103522 (2017), arXiv:1703.02556 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  76. [76]

    C. S. Lorenz, E. Calabrese, and D. Alonso, Phys. Rev. D 96, 043510 (2017), arXiv:1706.00730 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  77. [77]

    Constraints on the sum of neutrino masses using cosmological data including the latest extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey DR14 quasar sample

    S. Wang, Y.-F. Wang, and D.-M. Xia, Chin. Phys. C 42, 065103 (2018), arXiv:1707.00588 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  78. [78]

    Measuring growth index in a universe with massive neutrinos: A revisit of the general relativity test with the latest observations

    M.-M. Zhao, J.-F. Zhang, and X. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B 779, 473 (2018), arXiv:1710.02391 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  79. [79]

    Constraints on the sum of the neutrino masses in dynamical dark energy models with $w(z) \geq -1$ are tighter than those obtained in $\Lambda$CDM

    S. Vagnozzi, S. Dhawan, M. Gerbino, K. Freese, A. Goo- bar, and O. Mena, Phys. Rev. D 98, 083501 (2018), arXiv:1801.08553 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  80. [80]

    Impacts of gravitational-wave standard siren observation of the Einstein Telescope on weighing neutrinos in cosmology

    L.-F. Wang, X.-N. Zhang, J.-F. Zhang, and X. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B 782, 87 (2018), arXiv:1802.04720 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

Showing first 80 references.