Pith. sign in

hub

WildGuard: Open One-Stop Moderation Tools for Safety Risks, Jailbreaks, and Refusals of LLMs

38 Pith papers cite this work, alongside 3 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.

38 Pith papers citing it
3 external citations · Pith
abstract

We introduce WildGuard -- an open, light-weight moderation tool for LLM safety that achieves three goals: (1) identifying malicious intent in user prompts, (2) detecting safety risks of model responses, and (3) determining model refusal rate. Together, WildGuard serves the increasing needs for automatic safety moderation and evaluation of LLM interactions, providing a one-stop tool with enhanced accuracy and broad coverage across 13 risk categories. While existing open moderation tools such as Llama-Guard2 score reasonably well in classifying straightforward model interactions, they lag far behind a prompted GPT-4, especially in identifying adversarial jailbreaks and in evaluating models' refusals, a key measure for evaluating safety behaviors in model responses. To address these challenges, we construct WildGuardMix, a large-scale and carefully balanced multi-task safety moderation dataset with 92K labeled examples that cover vanilla (direct) prompts and adversarial jailbreaks, paired with various refusal and compliance responses. WildGuardMix is a combination of WildGuardTrain, the training data of WildGuard, and WildGuardTest, a high-quality human-annotated moderation test set with 5K labeled items covering broad risk scenarios. Through extensive evaluations on WildGuardTest and ten existing public benchmarks, we show that WildGuard establishes state-of-the-art performance in open-source safety moderation across all the three tasks compared to ten strong existing open-source moderation models (e.g., up to 26.4% improvement on refusal detection). Importantly, WildGuard matches and sometimes exceeds GPT-4 performance (e.g., up to 3.9% improvement on prompt harmfulness identification). WildGuard serves as a highly effective safety moderator in an LLM interface, reducing the success rate of jailbreak attacks from 79.8% to 2.4%.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 1 baseline 1 dataset 1

citation-polarity summary

representative citing papers

What Do Safety-Aligned LLMs Learn From Mixed Compliance Demonstrations?

cs.AI · 2026-06-18 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Safety-aligned LLMs treat benign and harmful compliance demonstrations differently in in-context learning, with preference optimization preventing benign examples from increasing harmful compliance and strong recency bias in ordering.

Efficient Safety Benchmarking via Item Response Theory

cs.CY · 2026-05-26 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Item Response Theory enables adaptive and fixed-subset item selection that reduces safety benchmark costs by 80-99.9% while preserving high correlation with full rankings.

Bayesian Model Merging

cs.LG · 2026-05-13 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Bayesian Model Merging introduces a bi-level optimization framework that merges task-specific models via closed-form Bayesian regression with an anchor prior and global hyperparameter search, outperforming baselines and nearly matching expert averages on up to 20-task vision and 5-task language Merg

Self-Mined Hardness for Safety Fine-Tuning

cs.LG · 2026-05-04 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0 · 2 refs

Self-mined hardness from model rollouts lowers WildJailbreak attack success to 1-3% on Llama-3 models while raising over-refusal, mitigated by 1:1 interleaving with benign prompts.

citing papers explorer

Showing 38 of 38 citing papers.