pith. sign in

hub

WildGuard: Open One-Stop Moderation Tools for Safety Risks, Jailbreaks, and Refusals of LLMs

24 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

24 Pith papers citing it
abstract

We introduce WildGuard -- an open, light-weight moderation tool for LLM safety that achieves three goals: (1) identifying malicious intent in user prompts, (2) detecting safety risks of model responses, and (3) determining model refusal rate. Together, WildGuard serves the increasing needs for automatic safety moderation and evaluation of LLM interactions, providing a one-stop tool with enhanced accuracy and broad coverage across 13 risk categories. While existing open moderation tools such as Llama-Guard2 score reasonably well in classifying straightforward model interactions, they lag far behind a prompted GPT-4, especially in identifying adversarial jailbreaks and in evaluating models' refusals, a key measure for evaluating safety behaviors in model responses. To address these challenges, we construct WildGuardMix, a large-scale and carefully balanced multi-task safety moderation dataset with 92K labeled examples that cover vanilla (direct) prompts and adversarial jailbreaks, paired with various refusal and compliance responses. WildGuardMix is a combination of WildGuardTrain, the training data of WildGuard, and WildGuardTest, a high-quality human-annotated moderation test set with 5K labeled items covering broad risk scenarios. Through extensive evaluations on WildGuardTest and ten existing public benchmarks, we show that WildGuard establishes state-of-the-art performance in open-source safety moderation across all the three tasks compared to ten strong existing open-source moderation models (e.g., up to 26.4% improvement on refusal detection). Importantly, WildGuard matches and sometimes exceeds GPT-4 performance (e.g., up to 3.9% improvement on prompt harmfulness identification). WildGuard serves as a highly effective safety moderator in an LLM interface, reducing the success rate of jailbreak attacks from 79.8% to 2.4%.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 1 baseline 1 dataset 1

citation-polarity summary

representative citing papers

Self-Mined Hardness for Safety Fine-Tuning

cs.LG · 2026-05-04 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Self-mined hardness from model rollouts reduces WildJailbreak attack success rates to 1-3% on Llama models but increases over-refusal on benign prompts, which mixing with adversarially-framed benign prompts partially mitigates.

Bayesian Model Merging

cs.LG · 2026-05-13 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Bayesian Model Merging introduces a bi-level optimization framework that merges task-specific models via closed-form Bayesian regression with an anchor prior and global hyperparameter search, outperforming baselines and nearly matching expert averages on up to 20-task vision and 5-task language Merg

IatroBench: Pre-Registered Evidence of Iatrogenic Harm from AI Safety Measures

cs.AI · 2026-04-09 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

AI models exhibit identity-contingent withholding, providing better clinical guidance on benzodiazepine tapering to physicians than laypeople in identical scenarios, with a measured decoupling gap of +0.38 and 13.1 percentage point drop in safety-critical action hit rates.

ShieldGemma: Generative AI Content Moderation Based on Gemma

cs.CL · 2024-07-31 · unverdicted · novelty 4.0

ShieldGemma delivers a family of Gemma2-based classifiers that outperform Llama Guard and WildCard on public safety benchmarks while introducing a synthetic-data curation pipeline for safety tasks.

citing papers explorer

Showing 24 of 24 citing papers.