Chain-of-thought prompting, by including intermediate reasoning steps in few-shot examples, elicits strong reasoning abilities in large language models on arithmetic, commonsense, and symbolic tasks.
super hub Canonical reference
Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback
Canonical reference. 93% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.
259
Pith papers citing it
Background
93% of classified citations
abstract
Making language models bigger does not inherently make them better at following a user's intent. For example, large language models can generate outputs that are untruthful, toxic, or simply not helpful to the user. In other words, these models are not aligned with their users. In this paper, we show an avenue for aligning language models with user intent on a wide range of tasks by fine-tuning with human feedback. Starting with a set of labeler-written prompts and prompts submitted through the OpenAI API, we collect a dataset of labeler demonstrations of the desired model behavior, which we use to fine-tune GPT-3 using supervised learning. We then collect a dataset of rankings of model outputs, which we use to further fine-tune this supervised model using reinforcement learning from human feedback. We call the resulting models InstructGPT. In human evaluations on our prompt distribution, outputs from the 1.3B parameter InstructGPT model are preferred to outputs from the 175B GPT-3, despite having 100x fewer parameters. Moreover, InstructGPT models show improvements in truthfulness and reductions in toxic output generation while having minimal performance regressions on public NLP datasets. Even though InstructGPT still makes simple mistakes, our results show that fine-tuning with human feedback is a promising direction for aligning language models with human intent.
hub tools
citation-role summary
background 54
method 1
other 1
citation-polarity summary
claims ledger
- abstract Making language models bigger does not inherently make them better at following a user's intent. For example, large language models can generate outputs that are untruthful, toxic, or simply not helpful to the user. In other words, these models are not aligned with their users. In this paper, we show an avenue for aligning language models with user intent on a wide range of tasks by fine-tuning with human feedback. Starting with a set of labeler-written prompts and prompts submitted through the OpenAI API, we collect a dataset of labeler demonstrations of the desired model behavior, which we u
authors
co-cited works
representative citing papers
KV cache quantization silently erodes LLM safety alignment via vulnerable low-dimensional subspaces, diagnosed by Per-Channel Reduction into three failure modes and mitigated training-free with up to 97% recovery.
RefusalBench shows strict refusal rates fail to rank frontier LLMs correctly on biological safety, with provider effects and partial-compliance patterns that binary metrics miss.
Prompt injection attacks can self-replicate across LLM agents in multi-agent systems, enabling data theft, misinformation, and system disruption while propagating silently.
ORPO performs preference alignment during supervised fine-tuning via a monolithic odds ratio penalty, allowing 7B models to outperform larger state-of-the-art models on alignment benchmarks.
DSPy compiles short declarative programs into LM pipelines that self-optimize and outperform both standard few-shot prompting and expert-written chains on math, retrieval, and QA tasks.
Generative agents with memory streams, reflection, and planning using LLMs exhibit believable individual and emergent social behaviors in a simulated town.
An unsupervised technique extracts latent yes-no knowledge from language model activations by locating a direction that satisfies logical consistency properties, outperforming zero-shot accuracy by 4% on average across models and datasets.
Language models generate robot policy code from natural language commands via few-shot prompting, enabling spatial-geometric reasoning, generalization, and precise control on real robots.
Controlled student-teacher experiments across four benchmarks show interactive gains are driven more by the student's ability to use feedback than by teacher quality, with self-feedback adding little beyond unguided retries.
TRL extends tandem training to RLVR pipelines, matching GRPO solo reasoning on Qwen3-4B math tasks while improving handoff robustness, reducing distributional drift, and increasing CoT legibility for the junior.
OPD updates occupy a relaxed off-principal regime and rapidly lock into a low-dimensional subspace that is functionally sufficient for its performance, distinct from SFT and RLVR trajectories.
LLM judges exhibit high stability under neutral re-evaluation but substantial reversibility under targeted post-decision challenges, quantified via a new Evaluation Robustness Score (ERS).
TTT-RTL performs per-design test-time RL on an LLM policy with EDA-derived PPA rewards and an adaptive KL controller, reducing geometric-mean PPA product by 65.1% on RTLLM v2.0 and ADP by 59.4% on an industrial FPU unit.
AIP models skills as graphs of discrete steps connected by typed I/O edges under a validated schema, raising agent mean reward from 0.60 to 0.71 and pass rate from 53% to 67% on 27 SkillsBench tasks while enabling node-level fixes.
Low-resource safety failures are action failures because the harmfulness representation transfers but the decision calibration does not; this is fixed by recalibrating a high-resource gate with 1-4 target-language examples.
EST-PRM stress-tests five PRM models on 4,687 reasoning chains from MATH-500, GSM8K, and PRMBench using three label-preserving transformations and reports model-specific vulnerability patterns.
Introduces (ε,q,t,A)-behavioral indistinguishability and shows via Qwen/Llama experiments that LoRA distillation boosts semantic similarity but leaves detectable behavioral differences under adversarial evaluation.
A hybrid first-order then zeroth-order optimization approach improves robustness of safety-aligned LLMs while preserving utility, with layer-wise sensitivity estimation for efficiency.
Sampling 20,000 stories shows 11 words dominate LLM outputs across models, linked to preference data and demonstrating alignment's disproportionate effect on diversity.
BC Protocol uses dual-expert structured dialogue to elicit more natural CoT than solo expert writing, demonstrated by large gains in naturalness ratings in a controlled fiction-domain experiment.
SELECT-LLM is the first active model selection framework for LLMs that uses expected information gain from pairwise output similarities to minimize required annotations, reporting up to 84.78% cost reduction across 23 datasets and 156 models.
Distribution-Aware Reward optimizes LLM regression by treating rollouts as empirical predictive distributions and rewarding marginal improvements in CRPS quality rather than point accuracy alone.
The paper defines accidental meltdowns as unsafe agent behavior triggered by benign errors and reports that such meltdowns occur in 64.7% of evaluated rollouts across GPT, Grok, and Gemini agents.
citing papers explorer
-
REPLUG: Retrieval-Augmented Black-Box Language Models
REPLUG improves frozen black-box LMs by prepending LM-supervised retrieved documents, delivering 6.3% better language modeling on GPT-3 and 5.1% better five-shot MMLU on Codex.
-
Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Models
PromptInject shows that simple adversarial prompts can cause goal hijacking and prompt leaking in GPT-3, exploiting its stochastic behavior.
-
Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Them
Chain-of-thought prompting enables large language models to surpass average human performance on 17 of 23 challenging BIG-Bench tasks.
-
Automatic Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language Models
Auto-CoT automatically builds chain-of-thought demonstrations by sampling diverse questions and letting the LLM generate reasoning chains, matching manual CoT performance on ten reasoning tasks with GPT-3.
-
Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learned
RLHF-aligned language models show increasing resistance to red teaming with scale up to 52B parameters, unlike prompted or rejection-sampled models, supported by a released dataset of 38,961 attacks.
-
Efficient Training of Language Models to Fill in the Middle
Autoregressive language models trained on data with middle spans relocated to the end learn infilling without degrading left-to-right perplexity or sampling quality.
-
Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know
Language models show good calibration when asked to estimate the probability that their own answers are correct, with performance improving as models get larger.
-
Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models
Emergent abilities are capabilities present in large language models but absent in smaller ones and cannot be predicted by extrapolating smaller model performance.
-
A Single Rewrite Suffices: Empirical Lessons from Production Skill Description Optimization
A single LLM rewrite of skill descriptions using false positive and negative cases matches manual optimization performance in production, with most other pipeline components adding little value.
-
Dynamic Infilling Anchors for Format-Constrained Generation in Diffusion Large Language Models
DIA is a training-free method that dynamically adjusts anchor positions in diffusion LLMs to improve format compliance and accuracy on reasoning benchmarks like GSM8K and MATH.
-
Pairwise Reference Alignment as a Model-Level Ordinal Observable
Pairwise reference alignment is formulated as an ordinal observable equal to the probability that a model score agrees with reference preferences on triples (x, y+, y-), with centered statistics, margin extensions, estimators, and concentration bounds.
-
KARMA: Karma-Aligned Reward Model Adaptation
KARMA adapts reward models from Reddit karma data to align LLMs with conversational pragmatics, finding that context-only rewards outperform karma-predictive ones downstream while reducing factuality across conditions.
-
When In-Distribution Gains Fail: Evaluating Weak-to-Strong Reward Models under Preference Shift
Weak-to-strong reward models succeed in-distribution but fail to transfer under preference shift due to source-domain feature pull; Representation Anchoring regularizer improves OOD performance.
-
Reducing Political Manipulation with Consistency Training
PCT is a reinforcement learning approach that trains LLMs for symmetric sentiment and helpfulness across paired opposing political prompts, reducing covert bias while preserving general performance.
-
Less Back-and-Forth: A Comparative Study of Structured Prompting
Checklist-improved prompts achieve the highest mean rubric score (7.50/8) and best quality-effort tradeoff compared to raw prompts (5.67) and clarifying-question prompts (6.67) across four task types and three LLMs.
-
Response-free item difficulty modelling for multiple-choice items with fine-tuned transformers: Component-wise representation and multi-task learning
Fine-tuned transformers with multi-task learning recover substantial wording-derived signal for item difficulty at small sample sizes typical in applied testing.
-
Cross-Lingual Jailbreak Detection via Semantic Codebooks
Semantic similarity to an English jailbreak codebook detects cross-lingual attacks with high accuracy on curated benchmarks but shows poor separability on diverse unsafe prompts.
-
DeepImagine: Learning Biomedical Reasoning via Successive Counterfactual Imagining
DeepImagine trains LLMs on counterfactual pairs from clinical trials using supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning to improve outcome prediction by approximating causal mechanisms.
-
Confident, Calibrated, or Complicit: Safety Alignment and Ideological Bias in LLM Hate Speech Detection
Censored LLMs achieve 69.0% strict accuracy in hate speech detection versus 64.1% for uncensored models and resist persona-based ideological influence better, but all exhibit overconfidence, irony failures, and group fairness disparities.
-
MemOS: A Memory OS for AI System
MemOS introduces a unified memory management framework for LLMs using MemCubes to handle and evolve different memory types for improved controllability and evolvability.
-
WildFeedback: Aligning LLMs With In-situ User Interactions And Feedback
WildFeedback extracts preference pairs from in-situ user feedback in LLM conversations to fine-tune models for better alignment with real user preferences.
-
Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part I: PPO
Policy constraints are the critical factor for stable PPO training in RLHF, and the proposed PPO-max variant improves stability for large language model alignment.
-
Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback
Self-Refine boosts LLM outputs by ~20% on average across seven tasks by having the same model iteratively generate, critique, and refine its own responses.
-
Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback
Pith review generated a malformed one-line summary.
-
Language-Specific Sentiment Polarity Biases in Encoder and Large Language Model Classification of Product Reviews
LLMs show negative polarity bias in French and encoder models show positive bias in Japanese when classifying product review sentiment.
-
A Survey on Efficient Inference for Large Language Models
The paper surveys techniques to speed up and reduce the resource needs of LLM inference, organized by data-level, model-level, and system-level changes, with comparative experiments on representative methods.
-
A Survey of Large Language Models
This survey reviews the background, key techniques, and evaluation methods for large language models, emphasizing emergent abilities that appear at large scales.
-
A Practice of Post-Training on Llama-3 70B with Optimal Selection of Additional Language Mixture Ratio
Empirical practice of continual pre-training Llama-3 models with optimized additional language mixture ratios to enhance Chinese capabilities, showing gains in benchmarks and domains like math and coding.
- You Had One Job: Per-Task Quantization Using LLMs' Hidden Representations