pith. sign in

hub Mixed citations

Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversations

Mixed citation behavior. Most common role is background (45%).

32 Pith papers citing it
Background 45% of classified citations
abstract

Fine-tuning on instruction data has been widely validated as an effective practice for implementing chat language models like ChatGPT. Scaling the diversity and quality of such data, although straightforward, stands a great chance of leading to improved performance. This paper aims to improve the upper bound of open-source models further. We first provide a systematically designed, diverse, informative, large-scale dataset of instructional conversations, UltraChat, which does not involve human queries. Our objective is to capture the breadth of interactions that a human might have with an AI assistant and employs a comprehensive framework to generate multi-turn conversation iteratively. UltraChat contains 1.5 million high-quality multi-turn dialogues and covers a wide range of topics and instructions. Our statistical analysis of UltraChat reveals its superiority in various key metrics, including scale, average length, diversity, coherence, etc., solidifying its position as a leading open-source dataset. Building upon UltraChat, we fine-tune a LLaMA model to create a powerful conversational model, UltraLLaMA. Our evaluations indicate that UltraLLaMA consistently outperforms other open-source models, including Vicuna, the previously recognized state-of-the-art open-source model. The dataset and the model will be publicly released\footnote{\url{https://github.com/thunlp/UltraChat}}.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 6 dataset 5

citation-polarity summary

clear filters

representative citing papers

Self-Rewarding Language Models

cs.CL · 2024-01-18 · conditional · novelty 7.0

Iterative self-rewarding via LLM-as-Judge in DPO training on Llama 2 70B improves instruction following and self-evaluation, outperforming GPT-4 on AlpacaEval 2.0.

Deep Pre-Alignment for VLMs

cs.CV · 2026-05-14 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Deep Pre-Alignment uses a small VLM perceiver instead of ViT to pre-align visual features with LLM text space, yielding 1.9-3.0 point gains on multimodal benchmarks and 32.9% less language forgetting.

The Impact of Off-Policy Training Data on Probe Generalisation

cs.AI · 2025-11-21 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Off-policy training data for LLM behavior probes causes significant generalization failures especially for intent-based behaviors like deception, and performance on coerced incentivised data correlates with real on-policy success.

SnapKV: LLM Knows What You are Looking for Before Generation

cs.CL · 2024-04-22 · conditional · novelty 6.0

SnapKV selects clustered important KV positions per attention head from an observation window at the prompt end, yielding 3.6x faster generation and 8.2x better memory efficiency on 16K-token inputs with comparable performance across 16 datasets.

Zephyr: Direct Distillation of LM Alignment

cs.LG · 2023-10-25 · accept · novelty 6.0

Zephyr-7B achieves state-of-the-art chat benchmark results among 7B models by distilling alignment via dDPO on AI feedback preferences, surpassing the 70B Llama-2-Chat model on MT-Bench with no human data required.

KARMA: Karma-Aligned Reward Model Adaptation

cs.CL · 2026-05-26 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

KARMA adapts reward models from Reddit karma data to align LLMs with conversational pragmatics, finding that context-only rewards outperform karma-predictive ones downstream while reducing factuality across conditions.

Do Linear Probes Generalize Better in Persona Coordinates?

cs.AI · 2026-05-10 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0 · 2 refs

Persona axes derived from contrastive prompts and PCA yield linear probes that generalize better than raw-activation probes across 10 datasets for deception and sycophancy.

What Is Preference Optimization Doing, and Why?

cs.LG · 2025-11-30 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

Gradient analysis and ablations show DPO and PPO have different target directions and component roles in preference optimization for LLMs.

citing papers explorer

Showing 6 of 6 citing papers after filters.