pith. sign in

super hub Mixed citations

Tetreault , title =

Mixed citation behavior. Most common role is background (50%).

128 Pith papers citing it
Background 50% of classified citations

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 7 other 1

citation-polarity summary

claims ledger

  • background comment-reply dataset for (dis) agreement detection in online debates. InThirty-fifth conference on neural information processing systems datasets and bench- marks track (round 2). Miklos Z Rácz and Daniel E Rigobon. 2023. Towards consensus: Reducing polarization by perturbing so- cial networks.IEEE Transactions on Network Sci- ence and Engineering, 10(6):3450-3464. ZP Rosen and Rick Dale. 2025. Antisemitic and islamophobic hate speech precedes a decrease in lexico-semantic diversity in comment
  • background 2005. Ha- hacronym: A computational humor system. InPro- ceedings of the ACL Interactive Poster and Demon- stration Sessions, pages 113-116. David Tomás, Reynier Ortega-Bueno, Guobiao Zhang, Paolo Rosso, and Rossano Schifanella. 2023. Transformer-based models for multimodal irony de- tection.Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Human- ized Computing, 14(6):7399-7410. Robert West and Eric Horvitz. 2019. Reverse- engineering satire, or "paper on computational hu- mor accepted despite making serious
  • background We define N scales with two adapter sets: G= {G1, . . . ,GN } (MGFA) and C={C 1, . . . ,CN } (MCFA). At each scale n, features are reshaped to a grid X (0) v ∈R H×W×D v and downsampled by Down(·,2 n−1): X (n) v = Down(X(0) v ,2 n−1).(4) Let Xv,n = Seq(X (n) v ) denote the flattened se- quence. We then refine and fuse: Gn =G n(Xv,n), C n =C n(Xv,n, Xt),(5) ˜Xv,n =G n +w C n,(6) where w balances global and cross-modal adapta- tion. An interleave-repeat upsampling restores the (a) MGFA Module. (b)
  • background Householder mean-direction alignment.The nuisance mean-direction difference is removed by mapping the sample mean direction of X onto that of Y via Householder reflection. Let ¯x= 1 n Pn i=1 xi, ¯y= 1 m Pm j=1 yj, ˆµx = ¯x ∥¯x∥2 , ˆµy = ¯y ∥¯y∥2 . If ˆµx ̸= ˆµy, the Householder axis is defined as u= ˆµx − ˆµy ∥ˆµx − ˆµy∥2 ,(5) and the reflection matrix is H=I−2uu ⊤,(6) which satisfies Hˆµx = ˆµy and H⊤H=I . We then alignXby applyingHto every vector inX: x′ i =Hx i (i= 1, . . . , n),(7) and Y is
  • other t→1 as the query requires more changes, thus (1−t)→1 as the query increases in accuracy. 3.6 Query Mutation Given the mutation temperaturet and assessment A from the critic, the original candidate QC is then rewritten via LLMmutate, which is prompted to produce an updated query candidate QC′ that in- corporates the changes recommended by the critic: QC′ =LLM mutate(Q, S′ i, QC, H, A, t)(6) We consider a single refinement step to consist of a call to the critic, followed by a subsequent call to t
  • background contribution of Q and P without the CoT rationale. Correspondingly, al no-CoT represents the attention activation excluding CoT. The additional term WV R(WKR)T q represents the contribution of the CoT rationale R to the hid- den activation. We can get the hidden activation by transforming the attention activation by a non- linear functionf: hl ≈h l no-CoT +f  WV R(WKR)T q  (7) Thus, we conclude that the rationale R in the CoT primarily contributes a shift in hidden acti- vation values, emphasi

authors

co-cited works

polarities

background 4 unclear 4

representative citing papers

Cell-Based Representation of Relational Binding in Language Models

cs.CL · 2026-04-21 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Large language models encode relational bindings via a cell-based representation: a low-dimensional linear subspace in which each cell corresponds to an entity-relation index pair and attributes are retrieved from the matching cell.

citing papers explorer

Showing 50 of 128 citing papers.