pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

Revisiting On-Policy Distillation: Empirical Failure Modes and Simple Fixes

Canonical reference. 89% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

27 Pith papers citing it
Background 89% of classified citations
abstract

On-policy distillation (OPD) is increasingly used in LLM post-training because it can leverage a teacher model to provide dense supervision on student rollouts. The standard implementation, however, usually reduces distribution matching to a sampled-token log-ratio, which can make the learning signal fragile on long rollouts whose prefixes drift away from the teacher's typical support. We revisit this formulation from both theoretical and implementation perspectives. Theoretically, token-level OPD is biased relative to sequence-level reverse-KL minimization, but admits a substantially tighter worst-case variance bound; a controlled synthetic study further shows that stronger future-reward coupling increases gradient variance and destabilizes training. Empirically, we identify three failure modes of sampled-token OPD: imbalanced token-level supervision, unreliable teacher guidance on student-generated prefixes, and tokenizer or special-token mismatch. These findings motivate teacher top-K local support matching, a truncated reverse-KL objective that compares teacher and student distributions over a teacher-supported token set at each prefix, together with top-p rollout sampling and special-token masking. Across single-task reasoning and multi-task benchmarks spanning agentic and reasoning settings, this objective improves optimization stability and yields a +19.8% performance gain over standard sampled-token OPD baselines, providing a practical recipe for more stable on-policy distillation.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 7 baseline 1 method 1

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 27

clear filters

representative citing papers

Rubric-based On-policy Distillation

cs.LG · 2026-05-08 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Rubric-based on-policy distillation allows training student models using only teacher responses by generating scoring rubrics from contrasts and using them for on-policy optimization, achieving superior performance and up to 10x better sample efficiency than logit-based approaches.

Self-Distilled RLVR

cs.LG · 2026-04-03 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

RLSD mixes self-distillation for token-level policy difference magnitudes with RLVR for reliable update directions from response correctness to reach higher convergence and better training stability.

ADWIN: Adaptive Windows for Horizon-Aware On-Policy Distillation

cs.LG · 2026-05-27 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

ADWIN adaptively selects training horizons in on-policy distillation via prefix alignment checks, cutting end-to-end cost by up to 4.1x while matching or exceeding full-rollout accuracy on math and code benchmarks.

DOPD: Dual On-policy Distillation

cs.AI · 2026-06-29 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

DOPD is an advantage-aware dual distillation method that dynamically assigns token supervision from either privileged teacher or student to transfer capability while mitigating non-replicable information asymmetry in on-policy distillation.

Are Full Rollouts Necessary for On-Policy Distillation?

cs.CL · 2026-05-29 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

Truncated and progressively lengthening rollouts in on-policy distillation match full-rollout performance on mathematical reasoning while using as little as 10% of the horizon and improving efficiency up to 3x.

On-Policy Distillation with Best-of-N Teacher Rollout Selection

cs.CV · 2026-05-10 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0 · 2 refs

BRTS improves on-policy distillation by sampling multiple teacher rollouts and selecting the best one via a correctness-first then alignment priority rule, yielding gains on AIME and AMC math benchmarks.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper after filters.

  • Rubric-based On-policy Distillation cs.LG · 2026-05-08 · unverdicted · none · ref 31 · internal anchor

    Rubric-based on-policy distillation allows training student models using only teacher responses by generating scoring rubrics from contrasts and using them for on-policy optimization, achieving superior performance and up to 10x better sample efficiency than logit-based approaches.