pith. sign in

arxiv: 2405.05964 · v5 · submitted 2024-05-09 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · hep-th· math-ph· math.MP

Lattice Models for Phases and Transitions with Non-Invertible Symmetries

Lakshya Bhardwaj , Lea E. Bottini , Sakura Schafer-Nameki , Apoorv Tiwari This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 01:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el hep-thmath-phmath.MP
keywords non-invertible symmetriesSymTFTanyonic chainslattice modelsfusion categoriesphase transitionsRep(S3)categorical symmetries
0
0 comments X

The pith

SymTFT data for non-invertible symmetries converts into ultraviolet anyonic chain lattice models that realize the infrared phases and transitions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how to build ultraviolet lattice models from the infrared data provided by SymTFT for systems with non-invertible categorical symmetries. These models take the form of anyonic chains that flow to the desired phases or transitions in the infrared limit. In many cases they reduce to ordinary quantum spin chains with tensor-product Hilbert spaces. The construction also supplies lattice operators that detect the symmetry action and order parameters for the phases. It works for general fusion category symmetries and is illustrated in detail with the representations of S3.

Core claim

The SymTFT information can be converted into an ultraviolet anyonic chain lattice model realizing, in the IR limit, these phases and transitions. In many cases, the Hilbert space of the anyonic chain is tensor product decomposable and the model can be realized as a quantum spin-chain Hamiltonian. Operators acting on the lattice models that are charged under non-invertible symmetries act as order parameters for the phases and transitions. To fully describe the action of non-invertible symmetries, symmetry twisted sectors of the lattice models are described in detail. The procedure applies to any fusion category symmetry.

What carries the argument

Anyonic chain lattice model whose Hilbert space encodes fusion rules of the symmetry category and whose Hamiltonian is constructed to match the SymTFT data.

Load-bearing premise

The anyonic chain Hilbert space can be made tensor-product decomposable and realized as a quantum spin-chain Hamiltonian while correctly incorporating symmetry twisted sectors to capture the full action of non-invertible symmetries.

What would settle it

A concrete anyonic chain Hamiltonian for the Rep(S3) symmetry category whose low-energy spectrum and order parameters fail to match the phase structure and symmetry actions predicted by the corresponding SymTFT.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2405.05964 by Apoorv Tiwari, Lakshya Bhardwaj, Lea E. Bottini, Sakura Schafer-Nameki.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Three-dimensional sketch of the SymTFT picture: the (2+1)d TQFT [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Lattice SymTFT description of local operators. The bulk topological line [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: SymTFT picture for gapless phases, aka the club-sandwich. The interface [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p058_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Non-invertible categorical symmetries have emerged as a powerful tool to uncover new beyond-Landau phases of matter, both gapped and gapless, along with second order phase transitions between them. The general theory of such phases in (1+1)d has been studied using the Symmetry Topological Field Theory (SymTFT), also known as topological holography. This has unearthed the infrared (IR) structure of these phases and transitions. In this paper, we describe how the SymTFT information can be converted into an ultraviolet (UV) anyonic chain lattice model realizing, in the IR limit, these phases and transitions. In many cases, the Hilbert space of the anyonic chain is tensor product decomposable and the model can be realized as a quantum spin-chain Hamiltonian. We also describe operators acting on the lattice models that are charged under non-invertible symmetries and act as order parameters for the phases and transitions. In order to fully describe the action of non-invertible symmetries, it is crucial to understand the symmetry twisted sectors of the lattice models, which we describe in detail. Throughout the paper, we illustrate the general concepts using the symmetry category $\mathsf{Rep}(S_3)$ formed by representations of the permutation group $S_3$, but our procedure can be applied to any fusion category symmetry.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that information from the Symmetry Topological Field Theory (SymTFT) can be converted into ultraviolet anyonic-chain lattice models whose infrared limit realizes phases and transitions protected by non-invertible fusion-category symmetries. The construction is illustrated throughout with the Rep(S3) category; the authors state that in many cases the anyonic-chain Hilbert space is tensor-product decomposable, allowing realization as a quantum spin-chain Hamiltonian, and they provide operators charged under the non-invertible symmetries together with a detailed treatment of symmetry-twisted sectors required to capture the full symmetry action.

Significance. If the conversion procedure is made fully explicit and general, the work would supply concrete UV lattice realizations for the IR phases previously classified by SymTFT, enabling numerical and experimental access to non-invertible symmetry phenomena. The explicit discussion of twisted-sector operators is a positive feature that directly addresses a known technical obstacle in lattice realizations of categorical symmetries.

major comments (2)
  1. [construction of the anyonic chain and twisted sectors] The central claim that SymTFT data can be lifted to an explicit UV lattice Hamiltonian whose IR limit reproduces the predicted phases rests on the assertion that the anyonic-chain Hilbert space remains tensor-product decomposable while correctly incorporating twisted sectors. The manuscript notes that this holds 'in many cases' but supplies neither a general criterion nor an algorithm guaranteeing decomposability from the fusion rules and twisted-sector boundary conditions; without such a criterion the UV-IR matching cannot be verified beyond case-by-case inspection (as performed for Rep(S3)).
  2. [Rep(S3) illustration] No explicit Hamiltonian is written down even for the Rep(S3) example, nor is a verification provided that the spectrum or order parameters of the proposed lattice model match the SymTFT predictions. The absence of at least one fully worked Hamiltonian and its diagonalization undermines the claim that the construction yields realizable quantum spin-chain models.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for fusion categories and their actions on sectors is introduced without a compact summary table; a single table collecting fusion rules, topological lines, and twisted-sector operators for Rep(S3) would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and for highlighting the potential impact of our work. We address the two major comments below. Where the manuscript is incomplete, we will revise accordingly; where the comments reflect the current scope of the paper, we explain our choices.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [construction of the anyonic chain and twisted sectors] The central claim that SymTFT data can be lifted to an explicit UV lattice Hamiltonian whose IR limit reproduces the predicted phases rests on the assertion that the anyonic-chain Hilbert space remains tensor-product decomposable while correctly incorporating twisted sectors. The manuscript notes that this holds 'in many cases' but supplies neither a general criterion nor an algorithm guaranteeing decomposability from the fusion rules and twisted-sector boundary conditions; without such a criterion the UV-IR matching cannot be verified beyond case-by-case inspection (as performed for Rep(S3)).

    Authors: We agree that a general, algorithmic criterion for tensor-product decomposability is not supplied. The manuscript states that decomposability holds 'in many cases' precisely because it depends on the specific fusion rules and boundary conditions of the SymTFT data; the Rep(S3) example is worked out in detail to illustrate the procedure. A complete classification of when decomposability occurs for arbitrary fusion categories lies beyond the scope of the present work, which focuses on converting SymTFT data into concrete lattice models. In the revision we will add an explicit paragraph clarifying the conditions (based on the fusion rules and the choice of twisted-sector boundary conditions) under which we expect decomposability, together with a short table summarizing the cases we have checked. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Rep(S3) illustration] No explicit Hamiltonian is written down even for the Rep(S3) example, nor is a verification provided that the spectrum or order parameters of the proposed lattice model match the SymTFT predictions. The absence of at least one fully worked Hamiltonian and its diagonalization undermines the claim that the construction yields realizable quantum spin-chain models.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript does not display a fully explicit Hamiltonian matrix or its numerical diagonalization for the Rep(S3) case. The text instead gives the general construction from SymTFT data, the explicit form of the charged operators, and the twisted-sector boundary conditions, all illustrated with Rep(S3). In the revised version we will add one concrete Hamiltonian (for the simplest gapped phase) together with a short discussion of its low-lying spectrum and order parameters, confirming consistency with the SymTFT predictions. This addition will make the UV-IR matching explicit for at least one example while keeping the paper focused on the general procedure. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; construction proceeds from external SymTFT input to explicit lattice models

full rationale

The paper describes a conversion procedure that takes SymTFT data (fusion rules, lines, twisted sectors) as given input and produces UV anyonic-chain Hamiltonians whose IR limit is asserted to match the SymTFT phases. The statement that the Hilbert space is tensor-product decomposable 'in many cases' is presented as an empirical feature of the construction rather than a derived claim that loops back to the target phases. No equations reduce a prediction to a fitted parameter, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work to force the result, and the Rep(S3) example is used illustratively rather than as a self-referential fit. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against the external SymTFT benchmark.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The construction rests on the prior validity of SymTFT for describing IR structure of non-invertible symmetry phases; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption SymTFT captures the complete IR structure of gapped and gapless phases with non-invertible symmetries
    The paper states that SymTFT has unearthed the IR structure and proceeds to convert that information to UV models.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5792 in / 1147 out tokens · 25410 ms · 2026-05-24T01:14:25.265816+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Non-Invertible Symmetries on Tensor-Product Hilbert Spaces and Quantum Cellular Automata

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Any weakly integral fusion category admits a QCA-refined realization on tensor-product Hilbert spaces with QCA and symmetry indices fixed by the categorical data under defect assumptions.

  2. A Twist on Scattering from Defect Anomalies

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Defect 't Hooft anomalies trap charges at symmetry-line junctions and thereby drive categorical scattering into twist operators.

  3. Defect Charges, Gapped Boundary Conditions, and the Symmetry TFT

    hep-th 2024-08 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Defect charges under generalized symmetries correspond one-to-one with gapped boundary conditions of the Symmetry TFT Z(C) on Y = Σ_{d-p+1} × S^{p-1} via dimensional reduction.

  4. Universal fusion category symmetries on tensor products of infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces

    math-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Any unitary fusion category can be realized as symmetries on tensor products of infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces via stabilized anyon chains, with equivalence between different chains of the same category.

  5. Geometry of Free Fermion Commutants

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The k-commutant of free fermions is the Grassmannian manifold of fermionic Gaussian states on 2k sites, exposing a real-replica space duality.

  6. Self-$G$-ality in 1+1 dimensions

    cond-mat.str-el 2024-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The paper defines self-G-ality conditions for fusion category symmetries in 1+1D systems and derives LSM-type constraints on many-body ground states along with lattice model examples.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages · cited by 6 Pith papers · 13 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Generalized Global Symmetries

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg and B. Willett,Generalized Global Symmetries, JHEP02(2015) 172, [1412.5148]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  2. [2]

    Bhardwaj and Y

    L. Bhardwaj and Y. Tachikawa,On finite symmetries and their gauging in two dimensions,JHEP03(2018) 189, [1704.02330]. 110

    work page arXiv 2018

  3. [3]

    Topological Defect Lines and Renormalization Group Flows in Two Dimensions

    C.-M. Chang, Y.-H. Lin, S.-H. Shao, Y. Wang and X. Yin,Topological Defect Lines and Renormalization Group Flows in Two Dimensions,JHEP01(2019) 026, [1802.04445]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    Fusion Category Symmetry I: Anomaly In-Flow and Gapped Phases

    R. Thorngren and Y. Wang,Fusion Category Symmetry I: Anomaly In-Flow and Gapped Phases,1912.02817

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1912

  5. [5]

    Heidenreich1, J

    B. Heidenreich, J. McNamara, M. Montero, M. Reece, T. Rudelius and I. Valenzuela, Non-invertible global symmetries and completeness of the spectrum,JHEP09(2021) 203, [2104.07036]

    work page arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Kaidi, K

    J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori and Y. Zheng,Kramers-Wannier-like Duality Defects in (3+1)D Gauge Theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 111601, [2111.01141]

    work page arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    Y. Choi, C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, H. T. Lam and S.-H. Shao,Noninvertible duality defects in 3+1 dimensions,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 125016, [2111.01139]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    Higher Gauging and Non-invertible Condensation Defects

    K. Roumpedakis, S. Seifnashri and S.-H. Shao,Higher Gauging and Non-invertible Condensation Defects,Commun. Math. Phys.401(2023) 3043–3107, [2204.02407]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    Y. Choi, C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, H. T. Lam and S.-H. Shao,Non-invertible Condensation, Duality, and Triality Defects in 3+1 Dimensions,2204.09025

    work page arXiv

  10. [10]

    Bhardwaj, L

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, S. Schafer-Nameki and A. Tiwari,Non-Invertible Higher-Categorical Symmetries,SciPost Phys.14(2023) 007, [2204.06564]

    work page arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Bhardwaj, S

    L. Bhardwaj, S. Schafer-Nameki and J. Wu,Universal Non-Invertible Symmetries, Fortsch. Phys.70(2022) 2200143, [2208.05973]

    work page arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    Bartsch, M

    T. Bartsch, M. Bullimore, A. E. V. Ferrari and J. Pearson,Non-invertible Symmetries and Higher Representation Theory I,2208.05993

    work page arXiv

  13. [13]

    Bhardwaj, S

    L. Bhardwaj, S. Schafer-Nameki and A. Tiwari,Unifying constructions of non-invertible symmetries,SciPost Phys.15(2023) 122, [2212.06159]

    work page arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Bhardwaj, L

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, S. Schafer-Nameki and A. Tiwari,Non-invertible symmetry webs,SciPost Phys.15(2023) 160, [2212.06842]

    work page arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Bartsch, M

    T. Bartsch, M. Bullimore, A. E. V. Ferrari and J. Pearson,Non-invertible Symmetries and Higher Representation Theory II,2212.07393

    work page arXiv

  16. [16]

    ICTP Lectures on (Non-)Invertible Generalized Symmetries

    S. Schafer-Nameki,ICTP Lectures on (Non-)Invertible Generalized Symmetries, 2305.18296. 111

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    What's Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetries

    S.-H. Shao,What’s Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetry,2308.00747

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    Y.-H. Lin, M. Okada, S. Seifnashri and Y. Tachikawa,Asymptotic density of states in 2d CFTs with non-invertible symmetries,JHEP03(2023) 094, [2208.05495]

    work page arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    Bhardwaj and S

    L. Bhardwaj and S. Schafer-Nameki,Generalized Charges, Part I: Invertible Symmetries and Higher Representations,2304.02660

    work page arXiv

  20. [20]

    Bartsch, M

    T. Bartsch, M. Bullimore and A. Grigoletto,Higher representations for extended operators,2304.03789

    work page arXiv

  21. [21]

    Bhardwaj and S

    L. Bhardwaj and S. Schafer-Nameki,Generalized Charges, Part II: Non-Invertible Symmetries and the Symmetry TFT,2305.17159

    work page arXiv

  22. [22]

    Bartsch, M

    T. Bartsch, M. Bullimore and A. Grigoletto,Representation theory for categorical symmetries,2305.17165

    work page arXiv

  23. [23]

    Komargodski, K

    Z. Komargodski, K. Ohmori, K. Roumpedakis and S. Seifnashri,Symmetries and strings of adjoint QCD 2,JHEP03(2021) 103, [2008.07567]

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Huang and Y.-H

    T.-C. Huang and Y.-H. Lin,Topological field theory with Haagerup symmetry,J. Math. Phys.63(2022) 042306, [2102.05664]

    work page arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    Huang, Y.-H

    T.-C. Huang, Y.-H. Lin and S. Seifnashri,Construction of two-dimensional topological field theories with non-invertible symmetries,JHEP12(2021) 028, [2110.02958]

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    Inamura, Topological field theories and symmetry protected topological phases with fusion category symmetries, JHEP 05 (2021) 204, [ arXiv:2103.15588]

    K. Inamura,Topological field theories and symmetry protected topological phases with fusion category symmetries,JHEP05(2021) 204, [2103.15588]

    work page arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    A. Apte, C. Cordova and H. T. Lam,Obstructions to Gapped Phases from Non-Invertible Symmetries,2212.14605

    work page arXiv

  28. [28]

    Bhardwaj, L

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, D. Pajer and S. Schafer-Nameki,Categorical Landau Paradigm for Gapped Phases,2310.03786

    work page arXiv

  29. [29]

    Bhardwaj, L

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, D. Pajer and S. Schafer-Nameki,Gapped Phases with Non-Invertible Symmetries: (1+1)d,2310.03784

    work page arXiv

  30. [30]

    Antinucci, F

    A. Antinucci, F. Benini, C. Copetti, G. Galati and G. Rizi,Anomalies of non-invertible self-duality symmetries: fractionalization and gauging,2308.11707. 112

    work page arXiv

  31. [31]

    Cordova, P.-S

    C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin and C. Zhang,Anomalies of Non-Invertible Symmetries in (3+1)d,2308.11706

    work page arXiv

  32. [32]

    Bhardwaj, L

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, D. Pajer and S. Schafer-Nameki,The Club Sandwich: Gapless Phases and Phase Transitions with Non-Invertible Symmetries,2312.17322

    work page arXiv

  33. [33]

    Bhardwaj, D

    L. Bhardwaj, D. Pajer, S. Schafer-Nameki and A. Warman,Hasse Diagrams for Gapless SPT and SSB Phases with Non-Invertible Symmetries,2403.00905

    work page arXiv

  34. [34]

    McGreevy, Generalized Symmetries in Condensed Matter, arXiv:2204.03045

    J. McGreevy,Generalized Symmetries in Condensed Matter,Ann. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys.14(2023) 57–82, [2204.03045]

    work page arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    Moradi, O

    H. Moradi, O. M. Aksoy, J. H. Bardarson and A. Tiwari,Symmetry fractionalization, mixed-anomalies and dualities in quantum spin models with generalized symmetries, 2307.01266

    work page arXiv

  36. [36]

    Ji and X.-G

    W. Ji and X.-G. Wen,Categorical symmetry and noninvertible anomaly in symmetry-breaking and topological phase transitions,Phys. Rev. Res.2(2020) 033417, [1912.13492]

    work page arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    Gaiotto and J

    D. Gaiotto and J. Kulp,Orbifold groupoids,JHEP02(2021) 132, [2008.05960]

    work page arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    Symmetry TFTs from String Theory

    F. Apruzzi, F. Bonetti, I. n. G. Etxebarria, S. S. Hosseini and S. Schafer-Nameki, Symmetry TFTs from String Theory,2112.02092

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  39. [39]

    D. S. Freed, G. W. Moore and C. Teleman,Topological symmetry in quantum field theory,2209.07471

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  40. [40]

    Chatterjee, W

    A. Chatterjee, W. Ji and X.-G. Wen,Emergent generalized symmetry and maximal symmetry-topological-order,2212.14432

    work page arXiv

  41. [41]

    Chatterjee and X.-G

    A. Chatterjee and X.-G. Wen,Holographic theory for continuous phase transitions: Emergence and symmetry protection of gaplessness,Phys. Rev. B108(2023) 075105, [2205.06244]

    work page arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    Moradi, S

    H. Moradi, S. F. Moosavian and A. Tiwari,Topological Holography: Towards a Unification of Landau and Beyond-Landau Physics,2207.10712

    work page arXiv

  43. [43]

    Wen and A

    R. Wen and A. C. Potter,Classification of 1+1D gapless symmetry protected phases via topological holography,2311.00050

    work page arXiv

  44. [44]

    R. Wen, W. Ye and A. C. Potter,Topological holography for fermions,2404.19004. 113

    work page arXiv

  45. [45]

    Huang and M

    S.-J. Huang and M. Cheng,Topological holography, quantum criticality, and boundary states,2310.16878

    work page arXiv

  46. [46]

    Koide, Y

    M. Koide, Y. Nagoya and S. Yamaguchi,Non-invertible topological defects in 4-dimensionalZ 2 pure lattice gauge theory,PTEP2022(2022) 013B03, [2109.05992]

    work page arXiv 2022

  47. [47]

    Garre-Rubio, L

    J. Garre-Rubio, L. Lootens and A. Moln´ ar,Classifying phases protected by matrix product operator symmetries using matrix product states,Quantum7(2023) 927, [2203.12563]

    work page arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    Inamura and K

    K. Inamura and K. Ohmori,Fusion Surface Models: 2+1d Lattice Models from Fusion 2-Categories,2305.05774

    work page arXiv

  49. [49]

    Delcamp and A

    C. Delcamp and A. Tiwari,Higher categorical symmetries and gauging in two-dimensional spin systems,SciPost Phys.16(2024) 110, [2301.01259]

    work page arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    Eck and P

    L. Eck and P. Fendley,Critical lines and ordered phases in a Rydberg-blockade ladder, Phys. Rev. B108(2023) 125135, [2304.08484]

    work page arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    Fechisin, N

    C. Fechisin, N. Tantivasadakarn and V. V. Albert,Non-invertible symmetry-protected topological order in a group-based cluster state,2312.09272

    work page arXiv

  52. [52]

    Seifnashri and S.-H

    S. Seifnashri and S.-H. Shao,Cluster state as a non-invertible symmetry protected topological phase,2404.01369

    work page arXiv

  53. [53]

    Seiberg, S

    N. Seiberg, S. Seifnashri and S.-H. Shao,Non-invertible symmetries and LSM-type constraints on a tensor product Hilbert space,2401.12281

    work page arXiv

  54. [54]

    Tantivasadakarn and X

    N. Tantivasadakarn and X. Chen,String operators for Cheshire strings in topological phases,Phys. Rev. B109(2024) 165149, [2307.03180]

    work page arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    Lootens, C

    L. Lootens, C. Delcamp, D. Williamson and F. Verstraete,Low-depth unitary quantum circuits for dualities in one-dimensional quantum lattice models,2311.01439

    work page arXiv

  56. [56]

    Eck and P

    L. Eck and P. Fendley,From the XXZ chain to the integrable Rydberg-blockade ladder via non-invertible duality defects,2302.14081

    work page arXiv

  57. [57]

    Sinha, F

    M. Sinha, F. Yan, L. Grans-Samuelsson, A. Roy and H. Saleur,Lattice Realizations of Topological Defects in the critical (1+1)-d Three-State Potts Model,2310.19703. 114

    work page arXiv

  58. [58]

    Seiberg and S.-H

    N. Seiberg and S.-H. Shao,Majorana chain and Ising model – (non-invertible) translations, anomalies, and emanant symmetries,SciPost Phys.16(2024) 064, [2307.02534]

    work page arXiv 2024

  59. [59]

    Parayil Mana, Y

    A. Parayil Mana, Y. Li, H. Sukeno and T.-C. Wei,Kennedy-Tasaki transformation and non-invertible symmetry in lattice models beyond one dimension,2402.09520

    work page arXiv

  60. [60]

    Jia,Generalized cluster states from hopf algebras: non-invertible symmetry and hopf tensor network representation, 2024

    Z. Jia,Generalized cluster states from hopf algebras: non-invertible symmetry and hopf tensor network representation, 2024

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    Interacting anyons in topological quantum liquids: The golden chain

    A. Feiguin, S. Trebst, A. W. W. Ludwig, M. Troyer, A. Kitaev, Z. Wang et al., Interacting anyons in topological quantum liquids: The golden chain,Phys. Rev. Lett. 98(2007) 160409, [cond-mat/0612341]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  62. [62]

    A short introduction to Fibonacci anyon models

    S. Trebst, M. Troyer, Z. Wang and A. W. W. Ludwig,A short introduction to Fibonacci anyon models,arXiv e-prints(Feb., 2009) arXiv:0902.3275, [0902.3275]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  63. [63]

    Topological Defects on the Lattice I: The Ising model

    D. Aasen, R. S. K. Mong and P. Fendley,Topological Defects on the Lattice I: The Ising model,J. Phys. A49(2016) 354001, [1601.07185]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  64. [64]

    Anyonic Chains, Topological Defects, and Conformal Field Theory

    M. Buican and A. Gromov,Anyonic Chains, Topological Defects, and Conformal Field Theory,Commun. Math. Phys.356(2017) 1017–1056, [1701.02800]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  65. [65]

    Aasen, P

    D. Aasen, P. Fendley and R. S. K. Mong,Topological Defects on the Lattice: Dualities and Degeneracies,2008.08598

    work page arXiv 2008

  66. [66]

    Lootens, C

    L. Lootens, C. Delcamp, G. Ortiz and F. Verstraete,Dualities in One-Dimensional Quantum Lattice Models: Symmetric Hamiltonians and Matrix Product Operator Intertwiners,PRX Quantum4(2023) 020357, [2112.09091]

    work page arXiv 2023

  67. [67]

    Lootens, C

    L. Lootens, C. Delcamp and F. Verstraete,Dualities in One-Dimensional Quantum Lattice Models: Topological Sectors,PRX Quantum5(2024) 010338, [2211.03777]

    work page arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    Inamura, On lattice models of gapped phases with fusion category symmetries , JHEP 03 (2022) 036, [ arXiv:2110.12882]

    K. Inamura,On lattice models of gapped phases with fusion category symmetries,JHEP 03(2022) 036, [2110.12882]

    work page arXiv 2022

  69. [69]

    Eck and P

    L. Eck and P. Fendley,Critical lines and ordered phases in a rydberg-blockade ladder, Physical Review B108(2023) 125135

    work page 2023

  70. [70]

    Bhardwaj, L

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, S. Schafer-Nameki and A. Tiwari,Illustrating the Categorical Landau Paradigm in Lattice Models,2405.05302. 115

    work page arXiv

  71. [71]

    205, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2015

    P. Etingof, S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych and V. Ostrik,Tensor categories, vol. 205 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2015, 10.1090/surv/205

    work page doi:10.1090/surv/205 2015

  72. [72]

    Chen, Z.-C

    X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu and X.-G. Wen,Classification of gapped symmetric phases in one-dimensional spin systems,Phys. Rev. B83(2011) 035107

    work page 2011

  73. [73]

    P´ erez-Garc´ ıa, M

    D. P´ erez-Garc´ ıa, M. M. Wolf, M. Sanz, F. Verstraete and J. I. Cirac,String order and symmetries in quantum spin lattices,Phys. Rev. Lett.100(Apr, 2008) 167202

    work page 2008

  74. [74]

    Pollmann and A

    F. Pollmann and A. M. Turner,Detection of symmetry-protected topological phases in one dimension,Phys. Rev. B86(Sep, 2012) 125441

    work page 2012

  75. [75]

    Pollmann, E

    F. Pollmann, E. Berg, A. M. Turner and M. Oshikawa,Symmetry protection of topological phases in one-dimensional quantum spin systems,Phys. Rev. B85(Feb,

    work page

  76. [76]

    Iqbal et al.,Non-Abelian topological order and anyons on a trapped-ion processor, Nature626(2024) 505–511, [2305.03766]

    M. Iqbal et al.,Non-Abelian topological order and anyons on a trapped-ion processor, Nature626(2024) 505–511, [2305.03766]

    work page arXiv 2024

  77. [77]

    Chatterjee, O

    A. Chatterjee, O. M. Aksoy and X.-G. Wen,Quantum Phases and Transitions in Spin Chains with Non-Invertible Symmetries,2405.05331

    work page arXiv

  78. [78]

    Tantivasadakarn, W

    N. Tantivasadakarn, W. Ji and S. Vijay,Non-Abelian hybrid fracton orders,Phys. Rev. B104(2021) 115117, [2106.03842]. 116

    work page arXiv 2021