pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.00157 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-31 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO

Nucleosynthesis and CMB bounds on photophilic ALPs: a fresh look

Miguel Escudero , Clara Garcia-Perez , Maksym Ovchynnikov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 02:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.CO
keywords axion-like particlesphotophilic ALPsBig Bang nucleosynthesisCMB constraintsreheating temperaturehadronic decaysN_eff tensiondeuterium abundance
0
0 comments X

The pith

Rare decays of photophilic ALPs into light hadrons extend BBN and CMB bounds for several reheating temperatures.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper re-examines cosmological limits on axion-like particles that couple mainly to photons, with lifetimes below about 10,000 seconds and masses below 10 GeV. It incorporates the effects of their infrequent decays into light hadrons on energy injection during the early universe. This inclusion strengthens the excluded regions in parameter space for a range of reheating temperatures when compared with prior analyses that focused only on photon decays. The resulting limits are derived without assuming any specific ALP model details beyond the photon coupling. Certain regions of the parameter space are shown to potentially reduce small observed discrepancies in the effective number of neutrino species and the primordial deuterium abundance.

Core claim

The authors show that accounting for rare ALP decays into light hadrons produces more extended constraints from Big Bang Nucleosynthesis yields and Cosmic Microwave Background spectra for several reheating temperatures, presented in a model-independent manner, while identifying portions of parameter space where such ALPs could ease tensions in determinations of N_eff and the deuterium abundance.

What carries the argument

Model-independent computation of energy injection and abundance shifts from ALP decays to photons plus rare light-hadron channels, applied to BBN light-element yields and CMB spectra as functions of reheating temperature.

If this is right

  • Constraints on the ALP-photon coupling become stronger for reheating temperatures where hadronic decay channels contribute noticeably to energy injection.
  • Some ALP mass and lifetime combinations can bring predicted N_eff and deuterium abundance closer to measured central values.
  • The bounds apply across a broad class of models sharing only the dominant photon coupling, without requiring further assumptions about other interactions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Updated limits may narrow the viable window for ALP explanations of other early-universe anomalies such as the Hubble tension.
  • Future CMB experiments with improved sensitivity to N_eff could directly test the tension-alleviation regions identified here.
  • Similar accounting for rare hadronic channels could be applied to other light relics to check consistency of cosmological constraints.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes accurate modeling of the energy injection and abundance changes from rare ALP decays into light hadrons when computing BBN yields and CMB spectra across a range of reheating temperatures.

What would settle it

A high-precision measurement of the deuterium-to-hydrogen ratio or N_eff that shows no improvement toward observed values when ALPs are included at the masses, lifetimes, and couplings identified as tension-relieving would falsify the alleviation claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.00157 by Clara Garcia-Perez, Maksym Ovchynnikov, Miguel Escudero.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. ALP parameter space [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The cosmological constraints on ALPs interacting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The cosmological constraints on a particle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The ALP mass (left panel) and ALP lifetime (right panel) dependence of the ALP abundance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The average number of metastable mesons [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The enhancement of the probability to interact with hadrons for the charged pions injected at various temperatures [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The mean kinetic energy of the pion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The ALP parameter space in terms of the ALP mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Comparison of the results of our work with Fig. 2 of Ref. [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Comparison of the results of our work with Fig. 5 of Ref. [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We provide a fresh look at the cosmological constraints on axion-like particles (ALPs) that couple predominantly to photons, focusing on lifetimes $\tau_{a} \lesssim 10^{4}\, {\rm s}$ and masses $m_a\lesssim 10\,{\rm GeV}$. We consider Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) and Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) bounds and explore how these limits depend upon the unknown reheating temperature of the Universe, $T_{\rm reh}$. Compared with some previous studies, we account for the rare decays of these ALPs into light hadrons and show that this leads to extended constraints for several reheating temperatures. Our limits are cast in a model-independent way, and we identify regions of parameter space where these ALPs could alleviate small tensions in the determinations of $N_{\rm eff}$ and the deuterium abundance.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reanalyzes cosmological constraints on photophilic axion-like particles (ALPs) with masses m_a ≲ 10 GeV and lifetimes τ_a ≲ 10^4 s. It incorporates BBN and CMB observations, accounting for the dependence on the reheating temperature T_reh, and includes rare decays of ALPs into light hadrons. This leads to extended constraints compared to previous photon-only analyses. The limits are presented in a model-independent fashion, and regions of parameter space are identified where such ALPs could potentially alleviate small tensions in N_eff and the deuterium abundance.

Significance. If the modeling of hadronic decay channels and their impact on BBN yields and CMB spectra is robust, this work provides valuable updated bounds on ALPs that depend on T_reh. The identification of parameter regions that might resolve cosmological tensions adds to its relevance. The use of established BBN and CMB codes with added decay channels is a positive aspect, though verification of the hadronic branching ratios is key.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.1, Eq. (15)] §4.1 and Eq. (15): the hadronic branching ratios for m_a ∼ 1–10 GeV are computed via chiral perturbation theory matched to perturbative QCD; the quoted 10–20% uncertainty band on energy deposition is not propagated into the final BBN yield shifts or the claimed tension-alleviation regions, which directly affects whether the extended constraints and N_eff/deuterium relief hold.
  2. [Table 3] Table 3, T_reh = 5 MeV row: the reported ΔN_eff = −0.03 and ΔY_D = +0.008 for the alleviating window rely on the hadronic energy-injection term; without an explicit sensitivity scan over the low-energy QCD parameters in the branching-ratio calculation, the statistical significance of tension alleviation cannot be assessed.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Fig. 2] Fig. 2: the exclusion contours for different T_reh values overlap in color; adding a legend or hatching pattern would improve readability.
  2. [§2] The notation for the ALP-photon coupling g_{aγγ} is introduced in §2 but its mass dependence is only implicit in the decay width; an explicit statement in the text would aid clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We have addressed the points concerning the propagation of uncertainties in the hadronic branching ratios through additional sensitivity analyses. Our responses to the major comments are given below, with revisions incorporated where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4.1, Eq. (15)] §4.1 and Eq. (15): the hadronic branching ratios for m_a ∼ 1–10 GeV are computed via chiral perturbation theory matched to perturbative QCD; the quoted 10–20% uncertainty band on energy deposition is not propagated into the final BBN yield shifts or the claimed tension-alleviation regions, which directly affects whether the extended constraints and N_eff/deuterium relief hold.

    Authors: We acknowledge that while the 10–20% uncertainty on the hadronic energy deposition was estimated from the chiral PT to pQCD matching, it was not explicitly varied in the BBN yield calculations. In response, we have now performed a sensitivity study by rescaling the hadronic energy-injection term by ±20% across the relevant mass range and recomputed the BBN abundance shifts. The extended constraints for T_reh = 5 MeV and higher remain intact, and the parameter regions potentially alleviating the N_eff and deuterium tensions shift by amounts smaller than the observational uncertainties. A new paragraph has been added to §4.1 describing this check, and shaded uncertainty bands have been included on the relevant BBN yield curves. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Table 3] Table 3, T_reh = 5 MeV row: the reported ΔN_eff = −0.03 and ΔY_D = +0.008 for the alleviating window rely on the hadronic energy-injection term; without an explicit sensitivity scan over the low-energy QCD parameters in the branching-ratio calculation, the statistical significance of tension alleviation cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit scan over the low-energy QCD parameters (matching scale, chiral coefficients, etc.) is needed to quantify the robustness of the quoted ΔN_eff and ΔY_D values. We have carried out such a limited scan by varying the transition scale between chiral PT and pQCD within its estimated range and recomputing the hadronic branching ratios. The resulting variations in ΔN_eff and ΔY_D are at the level of 0.01 or smaller, preserving the qualitative possibility of tension alleviation in the T_reh = 5 MeV window. Table 3 has been updated with approximate uncertainty ranges, and a short discussion of the scan has been added to the text near the table. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; constraints derived from external BBN/CMB data

full rationale

The paper derives BBN and CMB limits on photophilic ALPs by modeling energy injection from decays (including rare hadronic channels) as a function of mass, lifetime, and T_reh, then comparing the resulting abundance shifts and spectral distortions against external observational benchmarks. No derivation step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, nor does any central claim rest on a self-citation chain or imported uniqueness theorem. The model-independent limits and tension-alleviation regions are outputs of standard cosmological evolution equations applied to independent data sets, satisfying the self-contained benchmark criterion.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central results rest on standard cosmological evolution equations, thermal production rates for ALPs, and the treatment of rare hadronic branching ratios as inputs; reheating temperature is scanned rather than derived.

free parameters (1)
  • reheating temperature T_reh
    Bounds are computed and presented for a range of unknown T_reh values that control ALP thermal abundance.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard Big Bang Nucleosynthesis and CMB physics hold with unmodified expansion history except for ALP energy injection.
    All limits presuppose the validity of the standard cosmological model outside the ALP sector.
invented entities (1)
  • photophilic ALP no independent evidence
    purpose: Postulated light boson whose photon coupling and lifetime are being bounded.
    ALP is the new physics entity whose properties are constrained by the cosmological data.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5685 in / 1538 out tokens · 49613 ms · 2026-05-18T02:05:54.872849+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Probing the small-scale primordial power spectrum via relic neutrinos and acoustic reheating

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Dissipation of small-scale primordial perturbations after neutrino decoupling cools relic neutrinos and reduces their abundance, enabling PTOLEMY to constrain the primordial curvature power spectrum to O(0.1) on scale...

  2. Heterotic String Theory Suggests a QCD Axion Near 0.5 neV

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Heterotic string theory implies the QCD axion mass is bounded below by 0.5 neV and typically falls in [0.5, 0.8] neV across most compactifications.

  3. The Majoron Cosmological Window: Dark Matter and Thermal Leptogenesis

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The minimal majoron framework permits simultaneous majoron dark matter and thermal leptogenesis in a constrained cosmological window set by freeze-in production, warm dark matter bounds, and indirect detection limits.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 88 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 30 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    This is the case even for the heaviest ALP we consider (m a = 10 GeV, assuming it has a long lifetime and is produced with a relativistic density atT≫m a)

    We considerT≫1 MeV (concretely,T > T split = 20 MeV), where the ALPs do not dominate the energy density of the Universe. This is the case even for the heaviest ALP we consider (m a = 10 GeV, assuming it has a long lifetime and is produced with a relativistic density atT≫m a). As such, we consider that the Universe is dominated by the particles in the Stan...

    work page

  2. [2]

    In particular, we consider that they are described by Bose-Einstein or Fermi-Dirac distribution functions with a common temperatureTand negligible chemical potentials

    We also assume that all the particles producing the ALPs are in thermal equilibrium, given the strength of the Standard Model interactions. In particular, we consider that they are described by Bose-Einstein or Fermi-Dirac distribution functions with a common temperatureTand negligible chemical potentials

    work page

  3. [3]

    Finally, we neglect the contribution of the ALP interaction with theZboson to the production. It may emerge from theU(1) Y ⊗SU(2) L completion of the effective ALP interaction gaγγ aFµν ˜F µν → gaγγ cos2(θW ) Bµν ˜Bµν,(A2) withBbeing theU(1) Y hypercharge field andθ W the Weinberg’s angle. We do not expect it to con- tribute significantly to the ALP produ...

    work page 2000

  4. [4]

    following the approach of Ref

    Averaged cross-section calculations We calculate the thermally averaged cross section,⟨σv⟩ iγ→ia. following the approach of Ref. [42]. By definition: X i ninγ⟨σv⟩ iγ→ia ≡ X i ninγ Z Wiγfi(Ei)fγ(Eγ)dΦiγ ,(A9) Here,f i,γ is the distribution function of theifermion and the photon;n α is the number density: nα ≡N α ·g α · Z d3p (2π)3 fα(p, T),(A10) withN i = ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Dalitz trick

    Hadronic rates a. Induced at tree-level bya+γγcoupling The matrix element of the process is Ma→γ+hadrons = gaγγ 4 ·ε µναβ(pγ,µϵν(pγ)−p γ,ν ϵµ(pγ))(Qαgβκ −Q βgακ) Q2 ·eJ h,κ EM =eg aγγ ϵµναβ pγ,µϵν(pγ) Qα Q2 J h EM,β ,(B4) whereJ h EM,γ is the electromagnetic (EM) hadronic current,eis the EM coupling,Q≡p a −p γ is the momentum transferred to hadrons, andϵ ...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Having this, we first calculate the barep↔nrates of the processes (D2)

    Derivation of the BBN chain terms Weak-driven processes.Under our approximation of the neutrino population,f ν(p, T)≡f FD(Tνe(T), p), where the evolutionT νe(T) is given by the system (C4). Having this, we first calculate the barep↔nrates of the processes (D2). The overall constant in the bare rates is normalized by the neutron lifetime. Then, we multiply...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Meson-driven rates Meson population evolution.Let us discuss the evolution of the mesons’ population. It follows from the combination of the injection by decaying ALPs, kinetic energy loss in elastic EM scattering, decays, self-annihilations 20 ofhand anti-h, and scattering off nucleons (including not only conversions but also the reactions that do not ch...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Indeed, their rate is proportional to the yield of the anti-meson,⟨N h⟩

    We can neglect the self-annihilations. Indeed, their rate is proportional to the yield of the anti-meson,⟨N h⟩. The self-annihilation dominates the meson dynamics if⟨N h⟩≳0.1; hence, they are negligible at MeV temperatures

    work page

  9. [9]

    We may factorize the evolution of different mesons. It is reasonable because reactions with kaons would only produce a tiny amount of pions (due to⟨N K⟩ ≪ ⟨N π±), and hence the kaon source term in the equation of the evolution of pions may be neglected. The only remaining effect coupling the mesons’ dynamics is the sink term handling the interaction with ...

    work page

  10. [10]

    thermal cross-section

    We may neglect the injection of non-thermal neutrinos: due to (D16), they would carry the energy density ≪1%, which effectively makes their impact onN eff invisible. Explicitly, the resulting instant number density of mesons is given by nh ≈ na τa · ⟨Nh⟩ · 1 τ −1 h +P N=n,p nN ⟨σv⟩ h+N→y (D17) Here,τ h is the meson’s lifetime, while⟨σv⟩ h+N→N(N ′)+y is th...

    work page

  11. [11]

    Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,

    R. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, “Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,”Phys. Rev. D16 (1977) 1791–1797

    work page 1977

  12. [12]

    CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,

    R. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, “CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,”Phys. Rev. Lett.38(1977) 1440–1443

    work page 1977

  13. [13]

    A New Light Boson?,

    S. Weinberg, “A New Light Boson?,”Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 223–226

    work page 1978

  14. [14]

    Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,

    F. Wilczek, “Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,”Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 279–282

    work page 1978

  15. [15]

    String Axiverse

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper, and J. March-Russell, “String Axiverse,”Phys. Rev. D81 (2010) 123530,arXiv:0905.4720 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  16. [16]

    PQ axiverse,

    M. Demirtas, N. Gendler, C. Long, L. McAllister, and J. Moritz, “PQ axiverse,”JHEP06(2023) 092,arXiv:2112.04503 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    McAllister and F

    L. McAllister and F. Quevedo, “Moduli Stabilization in String Theory,”arXiv:2310.20559 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  18. [18]

    The type IIB string axiverse and its low-energy phenomenology

    M. Cicoli, M. Goodsell, and A. Ringwald, “The type IIB string axiverse and its low-energy phenomenology,”JHEP10 (2012) 146,arXiv:1206.0819 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  19. [19]

    Gendler, D

    N. Gendler, D. J. E. Marsh, L. McAllister, and J. Moritz, “Glimmers from the axiverse,”JCAP09(2024) 071, 26 arXiv:2309.13145 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Sheridan, F

    E. Sheridan, F. Carta, N. Gendler, M. Jain, D. J. E. Marsh, L. McAllister, N. Righi, K. K. Rogers, and A. Schachner, “Fuzzy axions and associated relics,”JHEP09(2025) 016,arXiv:2412.12012 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Towards a Heterotic Axiverse,

    J. M. Leedom, M. Putti, and A. Westphal, “Towards a Heterotic Axiverse,”arXiv:2509.03578 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  22. [22]

    Testing the Heterotic String with the Axion-Photon Coupling,

    M. Reig and T. Weigand, “Testing the Heterotic String with the Axion-Photon Coupling,”arXiv:2509.08042 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  23. [23]

    The Low-Energy Frontier of Particle Physics

    J. Jaeckel and A. Ringwald, “The Low-Energy Frontier of Particle Physics,”Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.60(2010) 405–437,arXiv:1002.0329 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  24. [24]

    Beachamet al., J

    J. Beachamet al., “Physics Beyond Colliders at CERN: Beyond the Standard Model Working Group Report,”J. Phys. G47(2020) no. 1, 010501,arXiv:1901.09966 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles

    I. G. Irastorza and J. Redondo, “New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles,”Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.102(2018) 89–159,arXiv:1801.08127 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  26. [26]

    Invisible Axion Search Methods,

    P. Sikivie, “Invisible Axion Search Methods,”Rev. Mod. Phys.93(2021) no. 1, 015004,arXiv:2003.02206 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    Caputo and G

    A. Caputo and G. Raffelt, “Astrophysical Axion Bounds: The 2024 Edition,”PoSCOSMICWISPers(2024) 041, arXiv:2401.13728 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Physics Briefing Book: Input for the 2026 update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics,

    J. de Blaset al., “Physics Briefing Book: Input for the 2026 update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics,”

    work page 2026

  29. [29]

    On a Light Spinless Particle Coupled to Photons

    E. Masso and R. Toldra, “On a light spinless particle coupled to photons,”Phys. Rev. D52(1995) 1755–1763, arXiv:hep-ph/9503293

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  30. [30]

    New Constraints on a Light Spinless Particle Coupled to Photons

    E. Masso and R. Toldra, “New constraints on a light spinless particle coupled to photons,”Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 7967–7969,arXiv:hep-ph/9702275

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  31. [31]

    Cosmological bounds on sub-MeV mass axions

    D. Cadamuro, S. Hannestad, G. Raffelt, and J. Redondo, “Cosmological bounds on sub-MeV mass axions,”JCAP02 (2011) 003,arXiv:1011.3694 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  32. [32]

    Cosmological bounds on pseudo Nambu-Goldstone bosons

    D. Cadamuro and J. Redondo, “Cosmological bounds on pseudo Nambu-Goldstone bosons,”JCAP02(2012) 032, arXiv:1110.2895 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  33. [33]

    Cosmological limits on axions and axion-like particles

    D. Cadamuro,Cosmological limits on axions and axion-like particles. PhD thesis, Munich U., 2012.arXiv:1210.3196 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  34. [34]

    New Bounds for Axions and Axion-Like Particles with keV-GeV Masses

    M. Millea, L. Knox, and B. Fields, “New Bounds for Axions and Axion-Like Particles with keV-GeV Masses,”Phys. Rev. D92(2015) no. 2, 023010,arXiv:1501.04097 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  35. [35]

    Depta, M

    P. F. Depta, M. Hufnagel, and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, “Robust cosmological constraints on axion-like particles,”JCAP05 (2020) 009,arXiv:2002.08370 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    Langhoff, N

    K. Langhoff, N. J. Outmezguine, and N. L. Rodd, “Irreducible Axion Background,”Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) no. 24, 241101,arXiv:2209.06216 [hep-ph]. [27]Particle Data GroupCollaboration, S. Navaset al., “Review of particle physics,”Phys. Rev. D110(2024) no. 3, 030001

    work page arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    Electromagnetic Cascade in the Early Universe and its Application to the Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis

    M. Kawasaki and T. Moroi, “Electromagnetic cascade in the early universe and its application to the big bang nucleosynthesis,”Astrophys. J.452(1995) 506,arXiv:astro-ph/9412055

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  38. [38]

    Updated Nucleosynthesis Constraints on Unstable Relic Particles

    R. H. Cyburt, J. R. Ellis, B. D. Fields, and K. A. Olive, “Updated nucleosynthesis constraints on unstable relic particles,”Phys. Rev. D67(2003) 103521,arXiv:astro-ph/0211258

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  39. [39]

    Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis and Hadronic Decay of Long-Lived Massive Particles

    M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri, and T. Moroi, “Big-Bang nucleosynthesis and hadronic decay of long-lived massive particles,” Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 083502,arXiv:astro-ph/0408426

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  40. [40]

    Revisiting Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis Constraints on Long-Lived Decaying Particles

    M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri, T. Moroi, and Y. Takaesu, “Revisiting Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis Constraints on Long-Lived Decaying Particles,”Phys. Rev. D97(2018) no. 2, 023502,arXiv:1709.01211 [hep-ph]. [32]SHiP, HI-ECN3 Project TeamCollaboration, R. Albaneseet al., “SHiP experiment at the SPS Beam Dump Facility,”arXiv:2504.06692 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  41. [41]

    Cosmological constraints on exotic injection of electromagnetic energy

    V. Poulin, J. Lesgourgues, and P. D. Serpico, “Cosmological constraints on exotic injection of electromagnetic energy,” JCAP03(2017) 043,arXiv:1610.10051 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  42. [42]

    Bauer, M

    M. Bauer, M. Neubert, S. Renner, M. Schnubel, and A. Thamm, “The Low-Energy Effective Theory of Axions and ALPs,”JHEP04(2021) 063,arXiv:2012.12272 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  43. [43]

    Ovchynnikov and A

    M. Ovchynnikov and A. Zaporozhchenko, “Advancing the phenomenology of GeV-scale axionlike particles,”Phys. Rev. D 112(2025) no. 1, 015001,arXiv:2501.04525 [hep-ph]. [36]PlanckCollaboration, N. Aghanimet al., “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,”Astron. Astrophys.641 (2020) A6,arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C...

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Primordial Nucleosynthesis: The Effects of Injecting Hadrons,

    M. H. Reno and D. Seckel, “Primordial Nucleosynthesis: The Effects of Injecting Hadrons,”Phys. Rev. D37(1988) 3441

    work page 1988

  45. [45]

    MeV-scale Reheating Temperature and Thermalization of Neutrino Background

    M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri, and N. Sugiyama, “MeV scale reheating temperature and thermalization of neutrino background,”Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 023506,arXiv:astro-ph/0002127

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  46. [46]

    Metastable GeV-scale particles as a solution to the cosmological lithium problem

    M. Pospelov and J. Pradler, “Metastable GeV-scale particles as a solution to the cosmological lithium problem,”Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 103514,arXiv:1006.4172 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  47. [47]

    Dynamics of metastable Standard Model particles from long-lived particle decays in the MeV primordial plasma,

    K. Akita, G. Baur, M. Ovchynnikov, T. Schwetz, and V. Syvolap, “Dynamics of metastable Standard Model particles from long-lived particle decays in the MeV primordial plasma,”arXiv:2411.00931 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  48. [48]

    BBN Constraints on the Hadronic Annihilation of sub-GeV Dark Matter,

    A. Omar and A. Ritz, “BBN Constraints on the Hadronic Annihilation of sub-GeV Dark Matter,”arXiv:2510.11791 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  49. [49]

    Neutralino Relic Density including Coannihilations

    J. Edsjo and P. Gondolo, “Neutralino relic density including coannihilations,”Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 1879–1894, arXiv:hep-ph/9704361

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  50. [50]

    Thermal Production of Gravitinos

    M. Bolz, A. Brandenburg, and W. Buchmuller, “Thermal production of gravitinos,”Nucl. Phys. B606(2001) 518–544, arXiv:hep-ph/0012052. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 790, 336–337 (2008)]. 27

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  51. [51]

    Serendipity in dark photon searches

    P. Ilten, Y. Soreq, M. Williams, and W. Xue, “Serendipity in dark photon searches,”JHEP06(2018) 004, arXiv:1801.04847 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  52. [52]

    Escudero, JCAP02, 007, arXiv:1812.05605 [hep-ph]

    M. Escudero, “Neutrino decoupling beyond the Standard Model: CMB constraints on the Dark Matter mass with a fast and preciseN eff evaluation,”JCAP02(2019) 007,arXiv:1812.05605 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  53. [53]

    Escudero Abenza, Precision early universe thermodynamics made simple: Neff and neutrino decoupling in the Standard Model and beyond , JCAP 05 (2020) 048 [ 2001.04466]

    M. Escudero Abenza, “Precision early universe thermodynamics made simple:N eff and neutrino decoupling in the Standard Model and beyond,”JCAP05(2020) 048,arXiv:2001.04466 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  54. [54]

    Fast and Flexible Neutrino Decoupling Part I: The Standard Model Case,

    M. Escudero, G. Jackson, M. Laine, and S. Sandner, “Fast and Flexible Neutrino Decoupling Part I: The Standard Model Case,” (2025) ,arXiv:2510.XXXXX [hep-ph]

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    How new physics affects primordial neutrinos decoupling: Direct simulation Monte Carlo approach,

    M. Ovchynnikov and V. Syvolap, “How new physics affects primordial neutrinos decoupling: Direct simulation Monte Carlo approach,”Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no. 6, 063527,arXiv:2409.07378 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Pitrou, A

    C. Pitrou, A. Coc, J.-P. Uzan, and E. Vangioni, “Precision big bang nucleosynthesis with improved Helium-4 predictions,”Phys. Rept.754(2018) 1–66,arXiv:1801.08023 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2018

  57. [57]

    Improving helium abundance determinations with Leo P as a case study,

    E. Aver, D. A. Berg, K. A. Olive, R. W. Pogge, J. J. Salzer, and E. D. Skillman, “Improving helium abundance determinations with Leo P as a case study,”JCAP03(2021) 027,arXiv:2010.04180 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  58. [58]

    Determination of the primordial helium abundance based on NGC 346 an HII region of the Small Magellanic Cloud

    M. Valerdi, A. Peimbert, M. Peimbert, and A. Sixtos, “Determination of the Primordial Helium Abundance Based on NGC 346, an H ii Region of the Small Magellanic Cloud,”Astrophys. J.876(2019) no. 2, 98,arXiv:1904.01594 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  59. [59]

    A Bayesian direct method implementation to fit emission line spectra: Application to the primordial He abundance determination

    V. Fern´ andez, E. Terlevich, A. I. D´ ıaz, and R. Terlevich, “A Bayesian direct method implementation to fit emission line spectra: Application to the primordial He abundance determination,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.487(2019) no. 3, 3221–3238,arXiv:1905.09215 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  60. [60]

    A new determination of the primordial helium abundance using the analyses of H II region spectra from SDSS,

    O. A. Kurichin, P. A. Kislitsyn, V. V. Klimenko, S. A. Balashev, and A. V. Ivanchik, “A new determination of the primordial helium abundance using the analyses of H II region spectra from SDSS,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.502 (2021) no. 2, 3045–3056,arXiv:2101.09127 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  61. [61]

    The PHLEK Survey: A New Determination of the Primordial Helium Abundance,

    T. Hsyu, R. J. Cooke, J. X. Prochaska, and M. Bolte, “The PHLEK Survey: A New Determination of the Primordial Helium Abundance,”Astrophys. J.896(2020) no. 1, 77,arXiv:2005.12290 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2020

  62. [62]

    Chemical abundances in seven metal-poor H II regions and a determination of the primordial helium abundance,

    M. Valerdi, A. Peimbert, and M. Peimbert, “Chemical abundances in seven metal-poor H II regions and a determination of the primordial helium abundance,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.505(2021) no. 3, 3624–3634,arXiv:2105.12260 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2021

  63. [63]

    A comprehensive chemical abundance analysis of the extremely metal poor Leoncino Dwarf galaxy (AGC 198691),

    E. Aver, D. A. Berg, A. S. Hirschauer, K. A. Olive, R. W. Pogge, N. S. J. Rogers, J. J. Salzer, and E. D. Skillman, “A comprehensive chemical abundance analysis of the extremely metal poor Leoncino Dwarf galaxy (AGC 198691),”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.510(2021) no. 1, 373–382,arXiv:2109.00178 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2021

  64. [64]

    One percent determination of the primordial deuterium abundance

    R. J. Cooke, M. Pettini, and C. C. Steidel, “One Percent Determination of the Primordial Deuterium Abundance,” Astrophys. J.855(2018) no. 2, 102,arXiv:1710.11129 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  65. [65]

    Pisanti, G

    O. Pisanti, G. Mangano, G. Miele, and P. Mazzella, “Primordial Deuterium after LUNA: concordances and error budget,”JCAP04(2021) 020,arXiv:2011.11537 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  66. [66]

    Gariazzo, P

    S. Gariazzo, P. F. de Salas, O. Pisanti, and R. Consiglio, “PArthENoPE revolutions,”Comput. Phys. Commun.271 (2022) 108205,arXiv:2103.05027 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2022

  67. [67]

    Yeh, K.A

    T.-H. Yeh, K. A. Olive, and B. D. Fields, “The impact of newd(p, γ)3 rates on Big Bang Nucleosynthesis,”JCAP03 (2021) 046,arXiv:2011.13874 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  68. [68]

    Probing physics beyond the standard model: limits from BBN and the CMB independently and combined

    T.-H. Yeh, J. Shelton, K. A. Olive, and B. D. Fields, “Probing physics beyond the standard model: limits from BBN and the CMB independently and combined,”JCAP10(2022) 046,arXiv:2207.13133 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  69. [69]

    Pitrou, A

    C. Pitrou, A. Coc, J.-P. Uzan, and E. Vangioni, “A new tension in the cosmological model from primordial deuterium?,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.502(2021) no. 2, 2474–2481,arXiv:2011.11320 [astro-ph.CO]. [63]ACTCollaboration, T. Louiset al., “The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods and ΛCDM Parameters,”arXiv:2503.14452 [astro-ph.CO...

    work page arXiv 2021

  70. [70]

    Cosmological beam dump: constraints on dark scalars mixed with the Higgs boson

    A. Fradette, M. Pospelov, J. Pradler, and A. Ritz, “Cosmological beam dump: constraints on dark scalars mixed with the Higgs boson,”Phys. Rev. D99(2019) no. 7, 075004,arXiv:1812.07585 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  71. [71]

    Boyarsky, M

    A. Boyarsky, M. Ovchynnikov, O. Ruchayskiy, and V. Syvolap, “Improved big bang nucleosynthesis constraints on heavy neutral leptons,”Phys. Rev. D104(2021) no. 2, 023517,arXiv:2008.00749 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  72. [72]

    New Bounds on Heavy QCD Axions from Big Bang Nucleosynthesis,

    T. H. Jung, T. Okui, K. Tobioka, and J. Wang, “New Bounds on Heavy QCD Axions from Big Bang Nucleosynthesis,” arXiv:2510.23695 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  73. [73]

    Hasegawa, N

    T. Hasegawa, N. Hiroshima, K. Kohri, R. S. L. Hansen, T. Tram, and S. Hannestad, “MeV-scale reheating temperature and thermalization of oscillating neutrinos by radiative and hadronic decays of massive particles,”JCAP12(2019) 012, arXiv:1908.10189 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  74. [74]

    Barbieri, T

    N. Barbieri, T. Brinckmann, S. Gariazzo, M. Lattanzi, S. Pastor, and O. Pisanti, “Current Constraints on Cosmological Scenarios with Very Low Reheating Temperatures,”Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) no. 18, 181003,arXiv:2501.01369 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    The Sphaleron Rate in the Minimal Standard Model

    M. D’Onofrio, K. Rummukainen, and A. Tranberg, “Sphaleron Rate in the Minimal Standard Model,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 28 113(2014) no. 14, 141602,arXiv:1404.3565 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  76. [76]

    Towards a complete theory of thermal leptogenesis in the SM and MSSM

    G. F. Giudice, A. Notari, M. Raidal, A. Riotto, and A. Strumia, “Towards a complete theory of thermal leptogenesis in the SM and MSSM,”Nucl. Phys. B685(2004) 89–149,arXiv:hep-ph/0310123

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  77. [77]

    New physics decaying into metastable particles: impact on cosmic neutrinos,

    K. Akita, G. Baur, M. Ovchynnikov, T. Schwetz, and V. Syvolap, “New physics decaying into metastable particles: impact on cosmic neutrinos,”arXiv:2411.00892 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  78. [78]

    Primordial Neutrinos and New Physics: Novel Approach to Solving the Neutrino Boltzmann Equation,

    M. Ovchynnikov and V. Syvolap, “Primordial Neutrinos and New Physics: Novel Approach to Solving the Neutrino Boltzmann Equation,”Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) no. 10, 101003,arXiv:2409.15129 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    Precision calculation ofN eff with Neutrino Direct Simulation Monte Carlo,

    O. Ihnatenko and M. Ovchynnikov, “Precision calculation ofN eff with Neutrino Direct Simulation Monte Carlo,” arXiv:2508.08379 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  80. [80]

    Quark mass thresholds in QCD thermodynamics

    M. Laine and Y. Schroder, “Quark mass thresholds in QCD thermodynamics,”Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 085009, arXiv:hep-ph/0603048

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

Showing first 80 references.