pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.02338 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-02 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Leading effective field theory corrections to the Kerr metric at all spins

Pedro G. S. Fernandes This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 03:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords effective field theoryhigher-derivative correctionsKerr metricblack hole spinnumerical relativitymodified gravity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Higher-derivative corrections modify the Kerr metric most strongly for rapidly rotating black holes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper parametrizes the leading corrections to General Relativity as higher-derivative interactions in a low-energy effective field theory that stays agnostic about any specific ultraviolet completion. Numerical methods are used to obtain the leading-order changes to the Kerr metric for every sub-extremal spin value, followed by an analysis of how these changes affect physical quantities around the black hole. The calculations show that the size of the corrections increases with spin, so that the fastest-rotating black holes experience the largest departures from the standard Kerr solution. A dataset of the corrected solutions and the code that produced them are released publicly.

Core claim

The leading corrections to General Relativity can be parametrized by higher-derivative interactions in a low-energy effective field theory, in a way that is general and agnostic to the precise UV completion of gravity. Using numerical methods, we compute the leading-order corrections to the Kerr metric across the entire range of sub-extremal values of spin and analyse their impact on physical quantities. We find that rapidly rotating black holes are most affected by the higher-derivative corrections, making them especially sensitive probes of new physics.

What carries the argument

Numerical integration of the perturbed field equations sourced by the leading higher-derivative operators evaluated on the Kerr background.

If this is right

  • Deviations from the Kerr geometry grow monotonically with the dimensionless spin parameter.
  • Observable quantities such as the horizon area, ergosphere boundary, and light-ring locations receive spin-dependent shifts.
  • The corrected metrics can be used as backgrounds for ray-tracing or wave-propagation calculations that test modified gravity.
  • Public release of the solution set allows direct insertion into existing black-hole imaging or ringdown codes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • High-spin black holes in X-ray binaries or LIGO/Virgo events would therefore furnish tighter constraints on the EFT coefficients than low-spin systems.
  • The same numerical pipeline could be applied to compute first-order shifts in the black-hole shadow diameter or in the leading quasinormal-mode frequencies.
  • If no deviations are seen in future high-spin observations, the result would translate into a lower bound on the scale suppressing the higher-derivative operators.

Load-bearing premise

The leading corrections to General Relativity are accurately captured by a finite set of higher-derivative operators in the low-energy EFT and the numerical method converges reliably for all sub-extremal spins.

What would settle it

A precision measurement of the shadow size or a quasinormal-mode frequency for a near-extremal black hole that lies closer to the pure Kerr value than the size of the computed EFT correction would falsify the claim that these corrections are largest at high spin.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.02338 by Pedro G. S. Fernandes.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Absolute difference between the numerical and ana [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Corrections to the perimetral location (top) and or [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The leading corrections to General Relativity can be parametrized by higher-derivative interactions in a low-energy effective field theory, in a way that is general and agnostic to the precise UV completion of gravity. Using numerical methods, we compute the leading-order corrections to the Kerr metric across the entire range of sub-extremal values of spin and analyse their impact on physical quantities. We find that rapidly rotating black holes are most affected by the higher-derivative corrections, making them especially sensitive probes of new physics. A dataset of solutions and the code used to produce them are publicly available.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper computes the leading higher-derivative corrections to the Kerr metric within a low-energy effective field theory of gravity using numerical methods, for the full range of sub-extremal spins. It reports that the size of these corrections increases with spin, with rapidly rotating black holes being most affected, and releases the dataset and code publicly.

Significance. If the numerical results hold, the work supplies a concrete, spin-dependent parametrization of EFT corrections to rotating black holes and identifies high-spin regimes as especially sensitive to new physics. The public release of solutions and code strengthens reproducibility.

major comments (1)
  1. [Numerical implementation (abstract and §3)] The abstract states that numerical methods were used but supplies no information on discretization, convergence tests, or error control. This is load-bearing for the central claim, because the reported growth of corrections with spin (and the conclusion that rapidly rotating black holes are most affected) cannot be assessed without explicit verification that the linearized EFT equations remain convergent and stable as a/M approaches 1.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] Clarify the precise set of higher-derivative operators retained in the EFT and state whether any are set to zero by symmetry or by choice.
  2. [Results section] The claim that high-spin black holes are 'especially sensitive probes' would benefit from a quantitative comparison of correction magnitudes at low versus high spin, e.g., in a table or figure caption.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of the work and for the constructive comment on the numerical implementation. We agree that additional details are warranted to support the central claims regarding the spin dependence of the EFT corrections. We have revised the manuscript to address this point directly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical implementation (abstract and §3)] The abstract states that numerical methods were used but supplies no information on discretization, convergence tests, or error control. This is load-bearing for the central claim, because the reported growth of corrections with spin (and the conclusion that rapidly rotating black holes are most affected) cannot be assessed without explicit verification that the linearized EFT equations remain convergent and stable as a/M approaches 1.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract and section 3 would benefit from more explicit information on the numerical methods. While the original manuscript outlines the overall approach in section 3, it does not include sufficient specifics on discretization, convergence tests, or quantitative error control. This information is important for readers to verify the reliability of the results, particularly as a/M approaches 1. In the revised manuscript we have expanded section 3 with a new subsection that describes the discretization scheme, reports convergence tests obtained by varying grid resolution and monitoring residuals, and provides error estimates that remain controlled up to the highest spins considered. We have also added a short discussion confirming stability of the linearized system near extremality. These changes directly support the reported growth of corrections with spin. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in numerical EFT computation

full rationale

The paper performs a direct numerical solution of the linearized higher-derivative EFT equations around the Kerr background for sub-extremal spins. No parameters are fitted to a data subset and then relabeled as predictions of related quantities, no self-citations to uniqueness theorems or ansatze are invoked as load-bearing premises, and the central result (size of corrections increasing with spin) follows from the numerical output rather than being definitionally equivalent to the input setup. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; full text unavailable, so ledger entries are inferred from the single paragraph provided.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Leading corrections to General Relativity can be parametrized by higher-derivative interactions in a low-energy effective field theory that is agnostic to the UV completion.
    Stated directly in the abstract as the starting point for the calculation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5381 in / 1028 out tokens · 27986 ms · 2026-05-17T03:15:08.878858+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quadratic gravity corrections to scalar QNMs of rapidly rotating black holes

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Leading-order deviations from general relativity in scalar quasinormal modes of rotating black holes are computed numerically up to dimensionless spins of 0.99 in quadratic-curvature scalar-tensor theories.

  2. Ringing of rapidly rotating black holes in effective field theory

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Leading-order cubic-curvature corrections to scalar quasinormal modes of black holes with spins up to 0.99M are computed numerically for modes up to l=5 with relative errors below 10^{-4}.

  3. Kerr Black Hole Ringdown in Effective Field Theory

    gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Effective field theory yields model-independent corrections to Kerr black hole quasinormal modes that oscillate logarithmically near extremality, indicating discrete scale invariance.

  4. Scalarizations of magnetized Reissner-Nordstr\"om black holes induced by parity-violating and parity-preserving interactions

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Magnetic fields lower the scalarization threshold for electromagnetic and gravitational Chern-Simons couplings but produce opposite trends on the two Gauss-Bonnet branches, with nonlinear terms converting exponential ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

123 extracted references · 123 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers · 33 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    R. P. Kerr, Phys. Rev. Lett.11, 237 (1963)

    work page 1963

  2. [2]

    Carter, Phys

    B. Carter, Phys. Rev. Lett.26, 331 (1971)

    work page 1971

  3. [3]

    D. C. Robinson, Phys. Rev. Lett.34, 905 (1975)

    work page 1975

  4. [4]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 221101 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 129902 (2018)], arXiv:1602.03841 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. D100, 104036 (2019), arXiv:1903.04467 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    Tests of General Relativity with Binary Black Holes from the second LIGO-Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. D 103, 122002 (2021), arXiv:2010.14529 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), (2021), arXiv:2112.06861 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  9. [9]

    GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), Phys. Rev. X13, 041039 (2023), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), (2025), arXiv:2508.18082 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    P. Amaro-Seoaneet al., arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1702.00786 (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro- ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  12. [12]

    Barausse et al., Prospects for Fundamental Physics with LISA, Gen

    E. Barausseet al., Gen. Rel. Grav.52, 81 (2020), arXiv:2001.09793 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector

    J. Luoet al.(TianQin), Class. Quant. Grav.33, 035010 (2016), arXiv:1512.02076 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  14. [14]

    Hu and Y.-L

    W.-R. Hu and Y.-L. Wu, National Science Review 4, 685 (2017), https://academic.oup.com/nsr/article- pdf/4/5/685/31566708/nwx116.pdf

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Punturoet al., Class

    M. Punturoet al., Class. Quant. Grav.27, 194002 (2010)

    work page 2010

  16. [16]

    (2025), arXiv:2509.08099 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Astro- phys. J. Lett.875, L1 (2019), arXiv:1906.11238 [astro- ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  18. [18]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Astro- phys. J. Lett.930, L12 (2022), arXiv:2311.08680 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    Akiyama et al

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Astro- phys. J. Lett.930, L17 (2022), arXiv:2311.09484 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Ayzenberg et al., Fundamental Physics Opportunities with the Next-Generation Event Horizon Telescope, arXiv preprint (2023), arXiv:2312.02130 [astro-ph.HE]

    D. Ayzenberget al., Living Rev. Rel.28, 4 (2025), [Er- ratum: Living Rev.Rel. 28, 7 (2025)], arXiv:2312.02130 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    M. D. Johnsonet al., Galaxies11, 61 (2023), arXiv:2304.11188 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    J. F. Donoghue, inAdvanced School on Effective Theo- ries(1995) arXiv:gr-qc/9512024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  23. [23]

    C. P. Burgess, Living Rev. Rel.7, 5 (2004), arXiv:gr- qc/0311082

    work page arXiv 2004

  24. [24]

    P. A. Cano and A. Ruip´ erez, JHEP05, 189 (2019), [Er- ratum: JHEP 03, 187 (2020)], arXiv:1901.01315 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  25. [25]

    de Rham, J

    C. de Rham, J. Francfort, and J. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 102, 024079 (2020), arXiv:2005.13923 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    An effective formalism for testing extensions to General Relativity with gravitational waves

    S. Endlich, V. Gorbenko, J. Huang, and L. Senatore, JHEP09, 122 (2017), arXiv:1704.01590 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  27. [27]

    Melville, Eur

    S. Melville, Eur. Phys. J. Plus139, 725 (2024), arXiv:2401.05524 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    K. K.-H. Lam, A. K.-W. Chung, and N. Yunes, (2025), arXiv:2509.07061 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    K. K.-H. Lam, A. K.-W. Chung, and N. Yunes, (2025), arXiv:2510.05208 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    G. T. Horowitz, M. Kolanowski, G. N. Remmen, and J. E. Santos, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 091402 (2023), arXiv:2303.07358 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    G. T. Horowitz, M. Kolanowski, G. N. Remmen, and J. E. Santos, JHEP05, 122 (2024), arXiv:2403.00051 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    de Rham, A.J

    C. de Rham, A. J. Tolley, and J. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 131102 (2022), arXiv:2112.05054 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    de Rham, S

    C. de Rham, S. Jaitly, and A. J. Tolley, Phys. Rev. D 108, 046011 (2023), arXiv:2212.04975 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    Z. Bern, D. Kosmopoulos, and A. Zhiboedov, J. Phys. A54, 344002 (2021), arXiv:2103.12728 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    H. S. Reall and J. E. Santos, JHEP04, 021 (2019), arXiv:1901.11535 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  36. [36]

    Ruhdorfer, J

    M. Ruhdorfer, J. Serra, and A. Weiler, JHEP05, 083 (2020), arXiv:1908.08050 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    Bernard, S

    L. Bernard, S. Giri, L. Lehner, and R. Sturani, (2025), arXiv:2507.17143 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Cardoso, M

    V. Cardoso, M. Kimura, A. Maselli, and L. Sena- tore, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 251105 (2018), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 131, 109903 (2023)], arXiv:1808.08962 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2018

  39. [39]

    de Rham and A

    C. de Rham and A. J. Tolley, Phys. Rev. D101, 063518 (2020), arXiv:1909.00881 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  40. [40]

    Allahyari, L

    A. Allahyari, L. Ma, S. Mukohyama, and Y. Pang, 6 JCAP11, 011 (2025), arXiv:2506.22548 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Figueras, A

    P. Figueras, A. Held, and ´A. D. Kov´ acs, (2024), arXiv:2407.08775 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    Davies and H

    I. Davies and H. S. Reall, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 171402 (2024), arXiv:2312.07659 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Y. Xie, J. Zhang, H. O. Silva, C. de Rham, H. Witek, and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 241104 (2021), arXiv:2103.03925 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  44. [44]

    H. O. Silva, A. Ghosh, and A. Buonanno, Phys. Rev. D107, 044030 (2023), arXiv:2205.05132 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    D. Li, P. Wagle, Y. Chen, and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021029 (2023), arXiv:2206.10652 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    Serra, J

    F. Serra, J. Serra, E. Trincherini, and L. G. Trombetta, JHEP08, 157 (2022), arXiv:2205.08551 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  47. [47]

    L. Ma, Y. Pang, and H. Lu, JHEP06, 087 (2023), [Erra- tum: JHEP 08, 118 (2024)], arXiv:2304.08527 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    H. O. Silva, G. Tambalo, K. Glampedakis, K. Yagi, and J. Steinhoff, Phys. Rev. D110, 024042 (2024), arXiv:2404.11110 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Kehagias and A

    A. Kehagias and A. Riotto, (2024), arXiv:2411.12428 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    L. Ma, Y. Pang, and H. Lu, JHEP02, 079 (2025), arXiv:2411.13639 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Cao, M.-F

    L.-M. Cao, M.-F. Ji, L.-B. Wu, and Y.-S. Zhou, (2025), arXiv:2508.13894 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Modelling self-consistently beyond General Relativ- ity,

    R. Cayuso, P. Figueras, T. Fran¸ ca, and L. Lehner, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 111403 (2023), arXiv:2303.07246 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  53. [53]

    Corman, L

    M. Corman, L. Lehner, W. E. East, and G. Dideron, Phys. Rev. D110, 084048 (2024), arXiv:2405.15581 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    Figueras, ´A

    P. Figueras, ´A. D. Kov´ acs, and S. Yao, JHEP25, 150 (2020), arXiv:2505.00082 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  55. [55]

    Hollands, A.D

    S. Hollands, ´A. D. Kov´ acs, and H. S. Reall, JHEP08, 258 (2022), arXiv:2205.15341 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  56. [56]

    F. S. Miguel, Phys. Rev. D109, 104016 (2024), arXiv:2308.03832 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  57. [57]

    P. A. Cano, K. Fransen, and T. Hertog, Phys. Rev. D 102, 044047 (2020), arXiv:2005.03671 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  58. [58]

    P. A. Cano, K. Fransen, T. Hertog, and S. Maenaut, Phys. Rev. D105, 024064 (2022), arXiv:2110.11378 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  59. [59]

    P. A. Cano, B. Ganchev, D. R. Mayerson, and A. Ruip´ erez, JHEP12, 120 (2022), arXiv:2208.01044 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  60. [60]

    A. K.-W. Chung, P. Wagle, and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. D107, 124032 (2023), arXiv:2302.11624 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  61. [61]

    P. A. Cano, K. Fransen, T. Hertog, and S. Maenaut, Phys. Rev. D108, 024040 (2023), arXiv:2304.02663 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  62. [62]

    P. A. Cano, K. Fransen, T. Hertog, and S. Maenaut, Phys. Rev. D108, 124032 (2023), arXiv:2307.07431 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  63. [63]

    A. K.-W. Chung, P. Wagle, and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. D109, 044072 (2024), arXiv:2312.08435 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    P. A. Cano and M. David, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 191401 (2025), arXiv:2407.12080 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    A. K.-W. Chung and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 181401 (2024), arXiv:2405.12280 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  66. [66]

    A. K.-W. Chung and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. D110, 064019 (2024), arXiv:2406.11986 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  67. [67]

    P. A. Cano and M. David, Phys. Rev. D110, 064067 (2024), arXiv:2407.02017 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    P. A. Cano, L. Capuano, N. Franchini, S. Maenaut, and S. H. V¨ olkel, Phys. Rev. D110, 104007 (2024), arXiv:2407.15947 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    P. A. Cano, L. Capuano, N. Franchini, S. Maenaut, and S. H. V¨ olkel, Phys. Rev. D110, 124057 (2024), arXiv:2409.04517 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  70. [70]

    Maenaut, G

    S. Maenaut, G. Carullo, P. A. Cano, A. Liu, V. Cardoso, T. Hertog, and T. G. F. Li, (2024), arXiv:2411.17893 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    P. A. Cano, JHEP07, 152 (2025), arXiv:2502.20185 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    A. K.-W. Chung, K. K.-H. Lam, and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. D111, 124052 (2025), arXiv:2503.11759 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  73. [73]

    A. K.-W. Chung and N. Yunes, (2025), arXiv:2506.14695 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    P. A. Cano, M. David, and G. van der Velde, (2025), arXiv:2509.08664 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    P. A. Cano, M. David, and G. van der Velde, (2025), arXiv:2510.17962 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  76. [76]

    Franchini, (2025), arXiv:2511.02010 [gr-qc]

    N. Franchini, (2025), arXiv:2511.02010 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  77. [77]

    J. L. Bl´ azquez-Salcedo, F. S. Khoo, B. Kleihaus, and J. Kunz, Phys. Rev. D111, L021505 (2025), arXiv:2407.20760 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  78. [78]

    Del Porro, F

    F. Del Porro, F. Ferrarin, and A. Platania, (2025), arXiv:2509.07058 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    H. Gies, B. Knorr, S. Lippoldt, and F. Saueressig, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 211302 (2016), arXiv:1601.01800 [hep- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  80. [80]

    Baldazzi, K

    A. Baldazzi, K. Falls, Y. Kluth, and B. Knorr, (2023), arXiv:2312.03831 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.