pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.21392 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-24 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · astro-ph.IM· gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Sensitivity of Weak Lensing Surveys to Gravitational Waves from Inspiraling Supermassive Black Hole Binaries

Tal Adi , Kris Pardo , Olivier Dor\'e
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 19:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.IMgr-qc
keywords weak lensinggravitational wavessupermassive black hole binariessensitivity curvescosmic varianceshear distortionsnanohertz frequencyLSST
0
0 comments X

The pith

An idealized weak lensing survey could access gravitational waves from supermassive black hole binaries in the nanohertz-microhertz band.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a signal-to-noise framework that folds in survey cadence, angular resolution, and depth to test whether weak lensing can register gravitational waves from inspiraling supermassive black hole binaries. It models the effective galaxy population to set the noise power spectral density and produces characteristic strain sensitivity curves for both realistic and perfect surveys. Real surveys such as LSST fall short because of resolution and measurement noise, yet a cosmic-variance-limited survey could in principle reach the target frequency range. The work therefore supplies an upper bound on the gravitational-wave information that weak lensing measurements can ever extract.

Core claim

We develop a signal-to-noise framework that incorporates survey characteristics such as cadence, angular resolution, and depth. Modeling the effective galaxy population yields the noise power spectral density, from which we derive characteristic strain sensitivity curves. Current surveys are limited by angular resolution and measurement noise, while an idealized cosmic-variance-limited survey could in principle probe the nanohertz to microhertz band. These results represent an ultimate limit on the information accessible through weak lensing measurements.

What carries the argument

The signal-to-noise framework that folds survey cadence, angular resolution, depth, and the modeled noise power spectral density from the effective galaxy population into sensitivity curves for GW-induced shear distortions.

Load-bearing premise

The modeling of the effective galaxy population used to evaluate the noise power spectral density, together with the applicability of the prior GW-induced shear distortions formalism to the nanohertz-microhertz band for SMBHBs.

What would settle it

A calculation or measurement showing that the noise power spectral density exceeds the expected gravitational-wave signal across the entire nanohertz-microhertz band even for a cosmic-variance-limited survey would falsify the claimed sensitivity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.21392 by Kris Pardo, Olivier Dor\'e, Tal Adi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Redshift distribution of galaxies for different r-band [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The characteristic noise hn(f) is shown for two weak-lensing survey configurations: (i) an LSST-like sur￾vey (purple dashed line) and (ii) a cosmic-limit survey (gray dashed line). For comparison, we also plot the effective sen￾sitivity of NANOGrav 15yr [60], using hn = h0 p fT15yr with T15yr = 15 years. Straight solid lines show the characteristic strain hc(f) for circular inspiraling binaries with variou… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Contours of the characteristic noise hn at f = 10 nHz as a function of the survey r-band AB magnitude thresh￾old mt and angular resolution σθ, assuming full-sky cover￾age and cadence ∆t = 1 day. The top axis shows the corre￾sponding total number of observed galaxies Ngal in the survey. White dashed lines indicate the parameter values of Vera Ru￾bin’s LSST [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The relative difference in hn, with the baseline given by the σθ = 0.01 arcsec slice in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Effective half-light radius r as a function of abso￾lute magnitude M in the r-band for early-type galaxies from Ref. [56] (blue points). The blue dashed line corresponds to the best-fit model in Ref. [56], while the orange dashed line shows our linear fit model. which is Eq. (14) in the main text. The last step is to average over the full sky. Using the response functions in Eq. (8), and their rotation pro… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Absolute magnitude limits MN=1 (red) and Mt (blue) as a function of redshift (top panel), together with their corresponding angular sizes (bottom panel). The re￾sults shown assume a full-sky configuration with mt = 28. The vertical dashed lines mark the redshifts at which the two magnitude limits intersect. The shaded region indicates the integration domain in Eq. (32). Appendix E: Treatment of Galaxy Size… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We explore the sensitivity of weak lensing surveys to gravitational waves (GWs) emitted by inspiraling supermassive black hole binaries (SMBHBs) in the nanohertz to microhertz frequency band, bridging the gap between pulsar timing arrays and space-based interferometers. Building on the formalism for GW-induced shear distortions, we develop a signal-to-noise framework that incorporates survey characteristics such as cadence, angular resolution, and depth. We model the effective galaxy population to evaluate the noise power spectral density and derive characteristic strain sensitivity curves. Applying this framework to both LSST-like and idealized survey configurations, we show that current surveys are limited by angular resolution and measurement noise, while an idealized, cosmic-variance-limited survey could in principle probe this frequency range. We emphasize that such sensitivity requires observational capabilities far beyond those of existing or planned facilities, and our results should be interpreted as an ultimate limit on the information accessible through weak lensing measurements.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a signal-to-noise framework for weak lensing surveys to detect gravitational waves from inspiraling supermassive black hole binaries in the nanohertz-microhertz band. It builds on prior GW-induced shear distortion formalism, models the effective galaxy population to compute the noise power spectral density, and derives characteristic strain sensitivity curves for LSST-like and idealized cosmic-variance-limited survey configurations, concluding that only the latter could in principle access this frequency range as an ultimate limit on weak lensing information.

Significance. If the formalism and noise modeling hold, the paper supplies a concrete theoretical upper bound on weak lensing sensitivity in the frequency gap between pulsar timing arrays and space-based interferometers. The explicit sensitivity curves for realistic versus idealized surveys provide a useful benchmark for assessing future observational requirements, even if the idealized case remains aspirational.

major comments (2)
  1. [GW-induced shear distortions formalism] The direct application of the standard local transverse-traceless GW-induced shear expression (used to compute the signal) to the 10^{-9}–10^{-6} Hz band requires explicit validation. At these frequencies the GW wavelength spans light-years to ~0.002 AU, comparable to or exceeding the light-travel time across typical survey depths; the integrated, time-averaged distortion on galaxy images may not be captured by the local approximation.
  2. [Modeling of the effective galaxy population] The noise power spectral density is set by the adopted effective galaxy population model (number density, redshift distribution, ellipticity dispersion). In the cosmic-variance-limited case these parameters directly determine the shot-noise floor and thus the claimed sensitivity curves; without a sensitivity analysis or justification of the idealized values, the curves could be optimistic by an undetermined factor.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and conclusions] The abstract states that results 'should be interpreted as an ultimate limit,' but the main text should more explicitly flag the two key assumptions (shear formalism applicability and galaxy-population parameters) as the dominant sources of uncertainty.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have incorporated revisions to strengthen the presentation of the formalism and noise modeling.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [GW-induced shear distortions formalism] The direct application of the standard local transverse-traceless GW-induced shear expression (used to compute the signal) to the 10^{-9}–10^{-6} Hz band requires explicit validation. At these frequencies the GW wavelength spans light-years to ~0.002 AU, comparable to or exceeding the light-travel time across typical survey depths; the integrated, time-averaged distortion on galaxy images may not be captured by the local approximation.

    Authors: We agree that explicit validation of the local transverse-traceless approximation is warranted at these frequencies. The formalism we employ follows from the geodesic deviation equation in the TT gauge and is standard in the literature for GW-induced shear. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection (and supporting appendix) that derives the applicability conditions, compares the GW wavelength to survey depth and light-travel time across the integration period, and demonstrates that the time-averaged local shear expression remains a valid leading-order approximation for the effective distortion signal under the survey parameters considered. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Modeling of the effective galaxy population] The noise power spectral density is set by the adopted effective galaxy population model (number density, redshift distribution, ellipticity dispersion). In the cosmic-variance-limited case these parameters directly determine the shot-noise floor and thus the claimed sensitivity curves; without a sensitivity analysis or justification of the idealized values, the curves could be optimistic by an undetermined factor.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this point. The idealized cosmic-variance-limited parameters are chosen to represent theoretical upper bounds on information content rather than any specific survey. In the revision we will add a new subsection that justifies the adopted values by reference to cosmic-variance limits in the literature and will include an explicit sensitivity analysis in which the galaxy number density and ellipticity dispersion are varied by factors of two to three around the fiducial values, showing the resulting range in the sensitivity curves. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; framework applies prior shear formalism and independent galaxy-population modeling to derive sensitivity limits

full rationale

The derivation constructs a signal-to-noise ratio by taking the GW-induced shear distortion formalism as an external input, then computes the noise power spectral density from an explicit model of effective galaxy number density, redshift distribution, and ellipticity dispersion. Sensitivity curves are obtained by combining these quantities with survey parameters such as cadence and depth; neither the signal expression nor the noise floor is obtained by fitting to the target sensitivity itself or by renaming a self-derived quantity. The idealized cosmic-variance-limited case is presented as an upper-bound limit rather than a fitted prediction, and no load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation chain or self-definitional loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides insufficient detail to enumerate specific free parameters or invented entities; the work relies on an existing formalism for GW-induced shear and a modeled effective galaxy population whose details are not stated.

free parameters (1)
  • effective galaxy population parameters
    Used to evaluate the noise power spectral density; specific values or fitting procedure not given in abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption formalism for GW-induced shear distortions
    The framework builds directly on this prior formalism without re-deriving it.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5474 in / 1331 out tokens · 46339 ms · 2026-05-16T19:23:50.164125+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · 32 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “Obser- vation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,” Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]. 13

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    Gravitational Wave Experiments and Early Universe Cosmology

    Michele Maggiore, “Gravitational wave experiments and early universe cosmology,” Phys. Rept.331, 283–367 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/9909001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  3. [3]

    Advanced LIGO

    J. Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific), “Advanced LIGO,” Class. Quant. Grav.32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  4. [4]

    Advanced Virgo: a 2nd generation interferometric gravitational wave detector

    F. Acerneseet al.(VIRGO), “Advanced Virgo: a second- generation interferometric gravitational wave detector,” Class. Quant. Grav.32, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  5. [5]

    Akutsuet al.(KAGRA), Overview of KAGRA: Detec- tor design and construction history, PTEP2021, 05A101 10 (2021), arXiv:2005.05574 [physics.ins-det]

    T. Akutsuet al.(KAGRA), “Overview of KAGRA: De- tector design and construction history,” PTEP2021, 05A101 (2021), arXiv:2005.05574 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run

    A.G. Abac, I. Abouelfettouh, F. Acernese,et al.(LIGO Scientific), “GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational- Wave Transient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observ- ing Run,” (2025), arXiv:2508.18082 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    GWTC-4.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries

    A.G. Abac, I. Abouelfettouh, F. Acernese,et al.(LIGO Scientific), “GWTC-4.0: Population Properties of Merg- ing Compact Binaries,” (2025), arXiv:2508.18083 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    GW250114: testing Hawking's area law and the Kerr nature of black holes

    A.G. Abac, I. Abouelfettouh, F. Acernese,et al.(LIGO Scientific), “GW250114: Testing Hawking’s Area Law and the Kerr Nature of Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 111403 (2025), arXiv:2509.08054 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    GW241011 and GW241110: Ex- ploring Binary Formation and Fundamental Physics with Asymmetric, High-spin Black Hole Coalescences,

    A.G. Abac, I. Abouelfettouh, F. Acernese,et al. (LIGO Scientific), “GW241011 and GW241110: Ex- ploring Binary Formation and Fundamental Physics with Asymmetric, High-spin Black Hole Coalescences,” (2025), 10.3847/2041-8213/ae0d54, arXiv:2510.26931 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae0d54 2025

  10. [10]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    Pau Amaro-Seoane, Heather Audley, Stanislav Babak, et al.(LISA), “Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,” (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  11. [11]

    TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector

    Jun Luo, Li-Sheng Chen, Hui-Zong Duan,et al.(Tian- Qin), “TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector,” (2015), 10.1088/0264-9381/33/3/035010, arXiv:1512.02076 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0264-9381/33/3/035010 2015

  12. [12]

    Space gravitational-wave anten- nas DECIGO and B-DECIGO,

    Seiji Kawamuraet al., “Space gravitational-wave anten- nas DECIGO and B-DECIGO,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D28, 1845001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna: Unveiling the Millihertz Gravitational Wave Sky

    John Baker, Jillian Bellovary, Peter L. Bender,et al., “The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna: Unveil- ing the Millihertz Gravitational Wave Sky,” (2019), arXiv:1907.06482 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array III. Search for gravitational wave signals

    J. Antoniadis, P. Arumugam, S. Arumugam,et al. (EPTA), “The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III. Search for gravitational wave signals,” Astron. Astrophys.678, A50 (2023), arXiv:2306.16214 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-Wave Background

    Gabriella Agazie, Akash Anumarlapudi, Anne M. Archibald,et al.(NANOGrav), “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational- wave Background,” (2023), 10.3847/2041-8213/acdac6, arXiv:2306.16213 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acdac6 2023

  16. [16]

    Zic et al.,The Parkes Pulsar Timing Array third data release,Publ

    Andrew Zicet al., “The Parkes Pulsar Timing Array third data release,” Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral.40, e049 (2023), arXiv:2306.16230 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Constraints on Supermassive Black Hole Binaries from the Gravitational-wave Background,

    Gabriella Agazie, Akash Anumarlapudi, Anne M. Archibald,et al.(NANOGrav), “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Constraints on Supermassive Black Hole Binaries from the Gravitational-wave Background,” (2023), 10.3847/2041-8213/ace18b, arXiv:2306.16220 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ace18b 2023

  18. [18]

    The stochastic gravitational-wave background from massive black hole binary systems: implications for observations with Pulsar Timing Arrays

    Alberto Sesana, Alberto Vecchio, and Carlo Nicola Co- lacino, “The stochastic gravitational-wave background from massive black hole binary systems: implications for observations with Pulsar Timing Arrays,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.390, 192 (2008), arXiv:0804.4476 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  19. [19]

    Expected properties of the first gravitational wave signal detected with pulsar timing arrays

    Pablo A. Rosado, Alberto Sesana, and Jonathan Gair, “Expected properties of the first gravitational wave sig- nal detected with pulsar timing arrays,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.451, 2417–2433 (2015), arXiv:1503.04803 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  20. [20]

    Physics Beyond the Standard Model With Pulsar Timing Arrays

    Xavier Siemens, Jeffrey S. Hazboun, Paul T. Baker,et al., “Physics Beyond the Standard Model With Pulsar Tim- ing Arrays,” (2019), arXiv:1907.04960 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  21. [21]

    Stochastic gravitational wave background: Upper limits in the 10**-6-Hz 10**-3-Hz band,

    J. W. Armstrong, L. Iess, P. Tortora, and B. Bertotti, “Stochastic gravitational wave background: Upper limits in the 10**-6-Hz 10**-3-Hz band,” Astrophys. J.599, 806–813 (2003)

    work page 2003

  22. [22]

    Asteroids forµHz gravitational- wave detection,

    Michael A. Fedderke, Peter W. Graham, and Sur- jeet Rajendran, “Asteroids forµHz gravitational- wave detection,” Phys. Rev. D105, 103018 (2022), arXiv:2112.11431 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    Gravitational wave timing array,

    Mar´ ıa Jos´ e Bustamante-Rosell, Joel Meyers, Noah Pear- son, Cynthia Trendafilova, and Aaron Zimmerman, “Gravitational wave timing array,” Phys. Rev. D105, 044005 (2022), arXiv:2107.02788 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    Sesanaet al., Unveiling the gravitational universe atµ-Hz frequencies, Exper

    Alberto Sesanaet al., “Unveiling the gravitational uni- verse atµ-Hz frequencies,” Exper. Astron.51, 1333–1383 (2021), arXiv:1908.11391 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    Mas- sive black hole binaries in active galactic nuclei,

    M. C. Begelman, R. D. Blandford, and M. J. Rees, “Mas- sive black hole binaries in active galactic nuclei,” Nature 287, 307–309 (1980)

    work page 1980

  26. [26]

    A Practical Theorem on Gravitational Wave Backgrounds

    E. S. Phinney, “A Practical theorem on gravitational wave backgrounds,” (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0108028

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  27. [27]

    The Astrophysics of Nanohertz Gravitational Waves

    Sarah Burke-Spolaoret al., “The Astrophysics of Nanohertz Gravitational Waves,” Astron. Astrophys. Rev.27, 5 (2019), arXiv:1811.08826 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  28. [28]

    The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics

    Adeela Afzal, Gabriella Agazie, Akash Anumarlapudi, et al.(NANOGrav), “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 951, L11 (2023), arXiv:2306.16219 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Astrometric Effects of a Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background

    Laura G. Book and Eanna E. Flanagan, “Astrometric Effects of a Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background,” 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.024024, arXiv:1009.4192 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.83.024024

  30. [31]

    Constraining the stochastic gravitational wave background with photometric surveys,

    Yijun Wang, Kris Pardo, Tzu-Ching Chang, and Olivier Dor´ e, “Constraining the stochastic gravitational wave background with photometric surveys,” Phys. Rev. D 106, 084006 (2022), arXiv:2205.07962 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  31. [32]

    Gravitational Wave Detection with Relative Astrometry using Roman’s Galactic Bulge Time Domain Survey,

    Kris Pardo, Tzu-Ching Chang, Olivier Dor´ e, and Yi- jun Wang, “Gravitational Wave Detection with Relative Astrometry using Roman’s Galactic Bulge Time Domain Survey,” (2023), arXiv:2306.14968 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2023

  32. [33]

    Fast Bayesian method for coherent gravitational wave searches with relative astrometry,

    Benjamin Zhang, Kris Pardo, Yijun Wang, Luke Bouma, Tzu-Ching Chang, and Olivier Dor´ e, “Fast Bayesian method for coherent gravitational wave searches with relative astrometry,” Phys. Rev. D112, 042002 (2025), arXiv:2506.19206 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [34]

    Large-Scale Structure with Gravitational Waves II: Shear

    Fabian Schmidt and Donghui Jeong, “Large-Scale Structure with Gravitational Waves II: Shear,” (), 14 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.083513, arXiv:1205.1514 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.083513

  34. [35]

    Cosmic Rulers

    Fabian Schmidt and Donghui Jeong, “Cosmic Rulers,” (), 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.083527, arXiv:1204.3625 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.083527

  35. [36]

    Large-Scale Structure with Gravitational Waves I: Galaxy Clustering

    Donghui Jeong and Fabian Schmidt, “Large-Scale Struc- ture with Gravitational Waves I: Galaxy Clustering,” 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.083512, arXiv:1205.1512 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.083512

  36. [37]

    Large-Scale Structure and Gravitational Waves III: Tidal Effects

    Fabian Schmidt, Enrico Pajer, and Matias Zaldarriaga, “Large-Scale Structure and Gravitational Waves III: Tidal Effects,” (2013), 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.083507, arXiv:1312.5616 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.083507 2013

  37. [39]

    A joint Roman Space Telescope and Ru- bin Observatory synthetic wide-field imaging survey,

    M.A. Troxel, C. Lin, A. Park,et al.(LSST Dark En- ergy Science), “A joint Roman Space Telescope and Ru- bin Observatory synthetic wide-field imaging survey,” (2022), 10.1093/mnras/stad664, arXiv:2209.06829 [astro- ph.IM]

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad664 2022

  38. [40]

    Wide-Field InfrarRed Survey Telescope-Astrophysics Focused Telescope Assets WFIRST-AFTA 2015 Report

    D. Spergelet al., “Wide-Field InfrarRed Sur- vey Telescope-Astrophysics Focused Telescope Assets WFIRST-AFTA 2015 Report,” (2015), arXiv:1503.03757 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  39. [41]

    Euclid Definition Study Report

    R. Laureijset al.(EUCLID), “Euclid Definition Study Report,” (2011), arXiv:1110.3193 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  40. [42]

    Euclid. I. Overview of the Euclid mission,

    Y. Mellier, J.A. Acevedo Barroso, A. Ach´ ucarro,et al. (Euclid), “Euclid. I. Overview of the Euclid mission,” (2024), 10.1051/0004-6361/202450810, arXiv:2405.13491 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450810 2024

  41. [43]

    Simulation-based infer- ence benchmark for weak lensing cosmology,

    Justine Zeghal, Denise Lanzieri, Fran¸ cois Lanusse,et al. (LSST Dark Energy Science), “Simulation-based infer- ence benchmark for weak lensing cosmology,” Astron. Astrophys.699, A327 (2025), arXiv:2409.17975 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [44]

    Cheong, W

    Avijit Bera, Leonel Medina Varela, Vinu Sooriyaarachchi,et al.(LSST Dark Energy Sci- ence), “A direct detection method of galaxy intrinsic ellipticity-gravitational shear correlation in non-linear regimes using self-calibration,” (2025), 10.1088/1475- 7516/2025/09/038, arXiv:2503.24269 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475- 2025

  43. [45]

    Scott Dodelson and Fabian Schmidt,Modern Cosmology (Academic Press, 2020)

    work page 2020

  44. [46]

    John David Jackson,Classical Electrodynamics(Wiley, 1998)

    work page 1998

  45. [47]

    Astrometric Effects of Gravitational Wave Backgrounds with non-Einsteinian Polarizations

    Deyan P. Mihaylov, Christopher J. Moore, Jonathan R. Gair,et al., “Astrometric Effects of Gravitational Wave Backgrounds with non-Einsteinian Polarizations,” (2018), 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.124058, arXiv:1804.00660 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.124058 2018

  46. [48]

    Persistent Astrometric Deflections from Gravitational-Wave Memory,

    Dustin R. Madison, “Persistent Astrometric Deflections from Gravitational-Wave Memory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 041101 (2020), arXiv:2007.12206 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  47. [49]

    Gravitational-wave sensitivity curves

    C.J. Moore, R.H. Cole, and C.P.L. Berry, “Gravitational-wave sensitivity curves,” (2014), 10.1088/0264-9381/32/1/015014, arXiv:1408.0740 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/1/015014 2014

  48. [50]

    The Effective Number Density of Galaxies for Weak Lensing Measurements in the LSST Project

    C. Chang, M. Jarvis, B. Jain,et al., “The Effective Num- ber Density of Galaxies for Weak Lensing Measurements in the LSST Project,” (2013), 10.1093/mnras/stt1156, arXiv:1305.0793 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1156 2013

  49. [51]

    Report of the Dark Energy Task Force,

    Andreas Albrecht, Gary Bernstein, Robert Cahn,et al., “Report of the Dark Energy Task Force,” arXiv:astro- ph/0609591 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv

  50. [52]

    Distance measures in cosmology

    David W. Hogg, “Distance measures in cosmology,” arXiv:astro-ph/9905116 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [53]

    An analytic expression for the luminosity function for galaxies,

    P. Schechter, “An analytic expression for the luminosity function for galaxies,” Astrophys. J.203, 297–306 (1976)

    work page 1976

  52. [54]

    2011, , 414, 264, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18402.x

    J. Loveday, P. Norberg, I.K. Baldry,et al., “Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA): ugriz galaxy lumi- nosity functions,” 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20111.x, arXiv:1111.0166 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20111.x 2011

  53. [55]

    2018 CLUMP-3D: Three-dimensional Shape and Structure of 20 CLASH Galaxy Clusters from Combined Weak and Strong Lensing.The Astrophysical Journal860, 126

    ˇZeljko Ivezi´ c, Steven M. Kahn, J.Anthony Tyson,et al. (LSST), “LSST: from Science Drivers to Reference De- sign and Anticipated Data Products,” 10.3847/1538- 4357/ab042c, arXiv:0805.2366 [astro-ph]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-

  54. [56]

    The size distribution of galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

    Shiyin Shen, H. J. Mo, Simon D. M. White, Michael R. Blanton, Guinevere Kauffmann, Wolfgang Voges, J. Brinkmann, and Istvan Csabai, “The Size distribution of galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Sur- vey,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.343, 978 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0301527

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  55. [57]

    The galaxy luminosity - size relation and selection biases in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field

    Ewan Cameron and S. P. Driver, “The galaxy luminosity- size relation and selection biases in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.377, 523–534 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0701419

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  56. [58]

    The Sloan Lens ACS Survey. XI. Beyond Hubble resolution: size, luminosity and stellar mass of compact lensed galaxies at intermediate redshift

    Elisabeth R. Newton, Philip J. Marshall, Matthew W. Auger,et al., “The Sloan Lens ACS Survey. XI. Be- yond Hubble resolution: size, luminosity and stellar mass of compact lensed galaxies at intermediate redshift,” 10.1088/0004-637X/734/2/104, arXiv:1104.2608 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/734/2/104

  57. [59]

    The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - IV. Implications for massive black holes, dark matter, and the early Universe,

    J. Antoniadis, P. Arumugam, S. Arumugam,et al. (EPTA), “The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - IV. Implications for massive black holes, dark matter, and the early Universe,” (2023), 10.1051/0004-6361/202347433, arXiv:2306.16227 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347433 2023

  58. [60]

    The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Bayesian Limits on Gravitational Waves from Individual Supermassive Black Hole Binaries,

    Gabriella Agazie, Akash Anumarlapudi, Anne M. Archibald,et al.(NANOGrav), “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Bayesian Limits on Gravitational Waves from Individual Supermassive Black Hole Binaries,” (2023), 10.3847/2041-8213/ace18a, arXiv:2306.16222 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ace18a 2023

  59. [61]

    Colour corrections for high redshift objects due to intergalactic attenuation,

    Avery Meiksin, “Colour corrections for high redshift objects due to intergalactic attenuation,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.365, 807–812 (2006), arXiv:astro- ph/0512435

    work page arXiv 2006

  60. [62]

    Impact of stellar population synthesis choices on for- ward modelling-based redshift distribution estimates,

    Luca Tortorelli, Jamie McCullough, and Daniel Gruen, “Impact of stellar population synthesis choices on for- ward modelling-based redshift distribution estimates,” Astron. Astrophys.689, A144 (2024), arXiv:2405.06009 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [63]

    A unified spin- harmonic framework for correlating pulsar timing, astro- metric deflection, and shimmering gravitational wave ob- servations,

    Giorgio Mentasti and Carlo R. Contaldi, “A unified spin- harmonic framework for correlating pulsar timing, astro- metric deflection, and shimmering gravitational wave ob- servations,” (2025), arXiv:2507.16906 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  62. [64]

    Searching for Grav- itational Waves with Gaia and its Cross-Correlation with PTA: Absolute vs Relative Astrometry,

    Massimo Vaglio, Mikel Falxa, Giorgio Mentasti, Ari- anna I. Renzini, Adrien Kuntz, Enrico Barausse, Carlo Contaldi, and Alberto Sesana, “Searching for Grav- itational Waves with Gaia and its Cross-Correlation with PTA: Absolute vs Relative Astrometry,” (2025), arXiv:2507.18593 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [65]

    Cross-correlating Astrometric and Timing Residuals to Constrain Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Backgrounds,

    Elias Fink, Carlo Contaldi, and Giorgio Mentasti, “Cross-correlating Astrometric and Timing Residuals to Constrain Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Backgrounds,” 15 (2025), arXiv:2510.25646 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  64. [66]

    Michele Maggiore,Gravitational Waves. Vol. 1: Theory and Experiments(Oxford University Press, 2007)

    work page 2007

  65. [67]

    On the lambert w function,

    Robert Corless, Gaston Gonnet, D. Hare, David Jeffrey, and D. Knuth, “On the lambert w function,” Advances in Computational Mathematics5, 329–359 (1996)

    work page 1996