On Quantum Simulation Of Cosmic Inflation

Junyu Liu; Yue-Zhou Li

REVIEW

On Quantum Simulation Of Cosmic Inflation

Junyu Liu, Yue-Zhou Li

Quantum Physics · Submitted 23 Sep 2020 · 153 references

Pith's verdict: First JLP-type algorithm for inflationary QFT with real content, but the central encoding step (Eq. 4.9) is not a basis choice and breaks the polynomial-time claim as stated; repairable by dropping the HKLL encoding and working in the Schrödinger picture.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on August 27, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 4 major objections · 4 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv ID2009.10921 (version 5)

Pith IDLQ6PSNER, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationJunyu Liu, Yue-Zhou Li. "On Quantum Simulation Of Cosmic Inflation." arXiv:2009.10921 (2020). https://pith.science/paper/LQ6PSNER

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

Two things you should know about this paper. First, it genuinely is the first attempt I know of to extend Jordan-Lee-Preskill from flat-space scattering to 3+1 inflationary QFT, with real content: lattice regularization of curvature perturbations, the in-in formalism review, a three-way Trotter splitting, and complexity estimates. Second, the central encoding step is wrong, and the polynomial-time claim as stated doesn't go through.

The problem is Section 4.3, Eq. (4.9). The authors write the interacting Heisenberg field ζ(τ,x) as a linear combination of ζ(τ0,y) and π(τ0,y) using kernels built from the free Wightman function. That is not a basis choice, as footnote 12 claims. In the interacting theory the Heisenberg equation is nonlinear (π^3 and π(∂ζ)^2 terms), so the exact operator is not a linear functional of the initial Cauchy data. What Eq. (4.9) defines is the free-evolved operator, and the circuit then simulates a different unitary, roughly U_free†(H0+HI)U_free, not the true Heisenberg evolution. Even at the free level, the Wightman function does not satisfy the retarded initial-value conditions needed for Green's identity; you need the retarded/commutator function. So the encoding step as written is doubly wrong.

The good news: this is likely repairable, and the repair might make the paper simpler. For computing ⟨Ω_in|O_H(τ)|Ω_in⟩, you don't need to express later-time Heisenberg operators in the initial-time field basis at all. You can work in the Schrödinger picture, evolve |Ω_in⟩ forward with H_S(τ), and measure O_S. That is the standard JLP approach and avoids the HKLL detour entirely. If the authors made that change, the Trotter/state-preparation discussion would carry over largely intact.

Other soft spots: the Trotter error estimates are explicitly rough—they admit as much in Section 4.8—and the ground state projection success probability/cost is not analyzed. Those are proportionate concerns, not fatal. The citation pattern looks fine; self-citations are peripheral.

Who is this for: people thinking about quantum simulation of QFT in curved spacetime, and cosmologists curious whether quantum computers could test the in-in formalism. As a paper, it is a valuable blueprint with a load-bearing flaw. I would send it to a serious referee, but the referee should be told that the encoding section needs to be rewritten or the claims downgraded.

Referee report

Major objections (4)

[Section 4.3, Eq. (4.9), footnote 12] The encoding step assumes that the interacting Heisenberg operator ζ(τ,x) can be written as a linear combination of ζ(τ0,y) and π_ζ(τ0,y) with kernels computed from the free theory. In the interacting theory, however, the Heisenberg equation is nonlinear because the Hamiltonian in Eq. (2.47) contains π_ζ^3 and π_ζ(∂ζ)^2 terms, so the exact operator is not a linear functional of the initial data. The assertion in footnote 12 that this is 'simply only a basis choice' is incorrect: a change of basis leaves the operators invariant, whereas Eq. (4.9) replaces the interacting field by a free-evolved field. The circuit therefore implements a different unitary, and generically does not reproduce the target correlator ⟨Ω_in(τ0)|O_H(τ)|Ω_in(τ0)⟩. This error is load-bearing for the main polynomial-time claim.
[Section 4.3, Eqs. (4.13) to (4.16)] The Green's identity in Eq. (4.14) requires a Green's function satisfying Eq. (4.13) with a delta-function source, together with appropriate boundary conditions. The Wightman two-point function in Eq. (4.16) solves the homogeneous equation, not the sourced equation. To reconstruct the field from initial Cauchy data one needs the retarded propagator, which satisfies the correct initial-condition limits. Using the Wightman function is therefore a technical error even in the free theory, and the kernels K_ζ and K_π in Eq. (4.15) are not the correct ones. This further undermines the encoding step.
[Section 4.7, Eq. (4.39)] The ground state projection by postselecting N_{k=0}=0 is not quantitatively analyzed. The paper does not bound the success probability of this postselection nor the number of repetitions needed. If the probability of observing zero for N_{k=0} is exponentially small in the system size or the adiabatic time, the claimed polynomial overhead fails. The statement that 'we only need to resolve the tunneling around the free theory regime' lacks a quantitative justification.
[Section 4.8, Eqs. (4.45) to (4.49)] The Trotter error estimate and the resulting gate count rely on the Hamiltonian norm bounds in Eq. (4.45) and the 'late-time dominance' assumption, which are not derived. In particular, the scaling ‖H3‖ ≲ O((V/ε_JLP)^{3/2}) and the commutator estimate in Eq. (4.46) are asserted without proof. Since the polynomial complexity claim rests on these estimates, the analysis as presented is incomplete. The authors acknowledge the roughness of this estimate in the text, but the concluding claim of a 'complete analysis' in Section 5 is therefore overstated.

Minor objections (4)

[Section 4.2] There is a typo in the heading: 'Jordan-Lee-Presklll' should be 'Jordan-Lee-Preskill'.
[Section 5.2] The discussion of the quantum Church-Turing thesis interprets Eq. (4.49) as exponential growth in the e-folding number N; the presence of e^{-N} in the denominator does support this, but the precise sense in which the resource cost scales with N should be stated explicitly.
[Throughout] The notation H is used for both the Hubble parameter and the Hamiltonian, as acknowledged in footnote 1. This is a potential source of confusion and could be disambiguated, for example by using H_H and H_{Hubble}.
[Reference [89]] The reference to a 'working in progress' paper is not a standard citation and should be updated or removed.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

A generalized Jordan-Lee-Preskill algorithm can simulate 3+1 dimensional inflationary quantum field theory on a quantum computer in polynomial time.

The reading

The paper argues that a generalized Jordan-Lee-Preskill algorithm can simulate 3+1 dimensional inflationary quantum field theory on a universal quantum computer in polynomial time in the lattice size. It lays out an end-to-end recipe: encode the curvature perturbation in a lattice field basis, prepare the interacting vacuum, Trotter-evolve the time-dependent Heisenberg Hamiltonian, and measure cosmological correlation functions of the form $\langle \Omega_{\rm in}(\tau_0) | O_H(\tau) | \Omega_{\rm in}(\tau_0) \rangle$. A successful simulation would let quantum devices compute cosmic non-Gaussianities and check the assumptions of the in-in formalism without doing perturbation theory by hand.

What carries the argument

The generalized Jordan-Lee-Preskill algorithm is the central object: an end-to-end protocol with encoding, state preparation, time evolution, and measurement. Its load-bearing piece is the HKLL-type encoding formula, which expresses the Heisenberg field at time $\tau$ as a linear combination of the initial-time field and momentum using kernels built from the free Wightman two-point function on the past light cone. Around that sit the multivariate Gaussian state-preparation algorithm for the free vacuum, the adiabatic interacting-vacuum preparation with zero-momentum ground-state projection, and a three-party time-dependent Trotter product formula whose error is bounded by commutators of the field, momentum, and mixing terms of the Hamiltonian.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that cosmic inflation is efficiently simulable: the paper constructs a complete generalization of the Jordan-Lee-Preskill algorithm for a massless scalar curvature perturbation $\zeta$ in a nearly de Sitter FRW background. The algorithm encodes the time-dependent Hamiltonian using a free-theory Green's identity on the past light cone, a reduced version of the HKLL bulk-reconstruction formula, so that field operators at later times are linear combinations of the initial field and momentum. It prepares the free Bunch-Davies vacuum with a Gaussian-state algorithm, adiabatically turns on interactions with a ground-state projection to remove zero-momentum degeneracy, implements the evolution with a three-party Trotter product formula, and measures late-time correlation functions. The authors estimate that the gate count is polynomial in the lattice volume and inverse error, while growing exponentially with the e-folding number $N$, and argue this supports a covariant version of the quantum-extended Church-Turing Thesis.

Load-bearing premise

The whole scheme rests on the encoding step assuming that the interacting Heisenberg field at later times is exactly a linear combination of the initial field and momentum computed from the free theory; if interactions make the true evolution nonlinear, the simulation implements a different theory.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the algorithm works as claimed, quantum computers could compute curvature-perturbation bispectra, including loop contributions, without relying on the perturbative in-in expansion.
It would provide a numerical check on the interacting-vacuum assumption underlying inflationary perturbation theory, bounding the error in the $i\epsilon$-prescription used to justify the in-in formalism.
The explicit polynomial-in-system-size gate count would give evidence for the quantum-extended Church-Turing Thesis in a curved-spacetime setting, while the resource growth with e-folding number would set a practical limit on how long an inflation simulation can run.
The same machinery could be adapted to other cosmic phases, such as reheating, bouncing cosmologies, and AdS scattering, as the paper discusses.
The algorithm supplies a benchmark problem for near-term and future quantum devices: the known perturbative answers for power spectra and bispectra can be used to check the hardware.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The linearity of the encoding is the point most worth stress-testing: the paper calls it a basis choice, but in an interacting theory the Heisenberg field solves a nonlinear equation, so the free-theory kernel may be only approximate. A small exact-diagonalization calculation on a few lattice sites could settle this before any large quantum device is built.
If the Trotter gate count really grows exponentially with e-folding number $N$, the same formula could be read as a resource-theoretic version of constraints on long inflation; future work might sharpen it into a quantitative relation between simulation cost and the Trans-Planckian Censorship or Distance conjectures.
The past-light-cone encoding is not specific to inflation: replacing the light cone with the causal wedge of AdS would produce a simulation algorithm for holographic correlators, linking quantum simulation cost to sub-AdS locality questions.

Original abstract

In this paper, we generalize Jordan-Lee-Preskill, an algorithm for simulating flat-space quantum field theories, to 3+1 dimensional inflationary spacetime. The generalized algorithm contains the encoding treatment, the initial state preparation, the inflation process, and the quantum measurement of cosmological observables at late time. The algorithm is helpful for obtaining predictions of cosmic non-Gaussianities, serving as useful benchmark problems for quantum devices, and checking assumptions made about interacting vacuum in the inflationary perturbation theory. Components of our work also include a detailed discussion about the lattice regularization of the cosmic perturbation theory, a detailed discussion about the in-in formalism, a discussion about encoding using the HKLL-type formula that might apply for both dS and AdS spacetimes, a discussion about bounding curvature perturbations, a description of the three-party Trotter simulation algorithm for time-dependent Hamiltonians, a ground state projection algorithm for simulating gapless theories, a discussion about the quantum-extended Church-Turing Thesis, and a discussion about simulating cosmic reheating in quantum devices.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,811 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.08 · states limitation 0.11 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.40 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v5. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

In this paper, we generalize Jordan-Lee-Preskill, an algorithm for simulating flat-space quantum field theories, to 3+1 dimensional inflationary spacetime. The generalized algorithm contains the encoding treatment, the initial state preparation, the inflation process, and the quantum measurement of cosmological observables at late time. The algorithm is helpful for obtaining predictions of cosmic non-Gaussianities, serving as useful benchmark problems for quantum devices, and checking assumptions made about interacting vacuum in the inflationary perturbation theory. Components of our work also include a detailed discussion about the lattice regularization of the cosmic perturbation theory, a detailed discussion about the in-in formalism, a discussion about encoding using the HKLL-type formula that might apply for both dS and AdS spacetimes, a discussion about bounding curvature perturbations, a description of the three-party Trotter simulation algorithm for time-dependent Hamiltonians, a ground state projection algorithm for simulating gapless theories, a discussion about the quantum-extended Church-Turing Thesis, and a discussion about simulating cosmic reheating in quantum devices.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	In this paper, we generalize Jordan-Lee-Preskill, an algorithm for simulating flat-space quantum field theories, to 3+1 dimensional inflationary spacetime.	contribution 1.00	0.92	0.30	asserted 1.00
s1	The generalized algorithm contains the encoding treatment, the initial state preparation, the inflation process, and the quantum measurement of cosmological observables at late time.	method 0.79	0.85	0.13	asserted 1.00
s2	The algorithm is helpful for obtaining predictions of cosmic non-Gaussianities, serving as useful benchmark problems for quantum devices, and checking assumptions made about interacting vacuum in the inflationary perturbation theory.	interpretation 0.71	0.30	0.29	asserted 0.86
s3	Components of our work also include a detailed discussion about the lattice regularization of the cosmic perturbation theory, a detailed discussion about the in-in formalism, a discussion about encoding using the HKLL-type formula that might apply for both dS and AdS spacetimes, a discussion about bounding curvature perturbations, a description of the three-party Trotter simulation algorithm for time-dependent Hamiltonians, a ground state projection algorithm for simulating gapless theories, a discussion about the quantum-extended Church-Turing Thesis, and a discussion about simulating cosmic reheating in quantum devices.	contribution 0.94	0.84	0.06	asserted 0.68

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.64.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v5

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

References

Works cited (153)

[1]

A. H. Guth, “The Inﬂationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,” Adv. Ser. Astrophys. Cosmol. 3 (1987) 139–148

View on Pith 1987
[2]

A. D. Linde, “A New Inﬂationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,” Adv. Ser. Astrophys. Cosmol. 3 (1987) 149–153

View on Pith 1987
[3]

A. Albrecht and P. J. Steinhardt, “Cosmology for Grand Uniﬁed Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking,” Adv. Ser. Astrophys. Cosmol. 3 (1987) 158–161. – 62 –

View on Pith 1987
[4]

A. A. Starobinsky, “A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,” Adv. Ser. Astrophys. Cosmol. 3 (1987) 130–133

View on Pith 1987
[5]

K. Sato, “First Order Phase Transition of a Vacuum and Expansion of the Universe,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 195 (1981) 467–479

View on Pith 1981
[6]

L. Fang, “Entropy Generation in the Early Universe by Dissipative Processes Near the Higgs’ Phase Transitions,” Phys. Lett. B 95 (1980) 154–156

View on Pith 1980
[7]

V. F. Mukhanov and G. V. Chibisov, “Quantum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe,” JETP Lett. 33 (1981) 532–535

View on Pith 1981
[8]

A. A. Starobinsky, “Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inﬂationary Universe Scenario and Generation of Perturbations,” Phys. Lett. B 117 (1982) 175–178

View on Pith 1982
[9]

A. H. Guth and S. Pi, “Fluctuations in the New Inﬂationary Universe,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (1982) 1110–1113

View on Pith 1982
[10]

J. M. Bardeen, P. J. Steinhardt, and M. S. Turner, “Spontaneous Creation of Almost Scale - Free Density Perturbations in an Inﬂationary Universe,” Phys. Rev. D 28 (1983) 679

View on Pith 1983
[11]

V. F. Mukhanov, H. Feldman, and R. H. Brandenberger, “Theory of cosmological perturbations. Part 1. Classical perturbations. Part 2. Quantum theory of perturbations. Part 3. Extensions,” Phys. Rept. 215 (1992) 203–333

View on Pith 1992
[12]

J. M. Maldacena, “Non-Gaussian features of primordial ﬂuctuations in single ﬁeld inﬂationary models,” JHEP 05 (2003) 013, arXiv:astro-ph/0210603

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003
[13]

A. D. Linde, Particle physics and inﬂationary cosmology , vol. 5. 1990. arXiv:hep-th/0503203

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1990
[14]

X. Chen, M.-x. Huang, S. Kachru, and G. Shiu, “Observational signatures and non-Gaussianities of general single ﬁeld inﬂation,” JCAP 01 (2007) 002, arXiv:hep-th/0605045

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2007
[15]

C. Cheung, P. Creminelli, A. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, and L. Senatore, “The Eﬀective Field Theory of Inﬂation,” JHEP 03 (2008) 014, arXiv:0709.0293 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2008
[16]

S. Weinberg, “Eﬀective Field Theory for Inﬂation,” Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 123541, arXiv:0804.4291 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2008
[17]

K. A. Malik and D. Wands, “Cosmological perturbations,” Phys. Rept. 475 (2009) 1–51, arXiv:0809.4944 [astro-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2009
[18]

X. Chen and Y. Wang, “Quasi-Single Field Inﬂation and Non-Gaussianities,” JCAP 04 (2010) 027, arXiv:0911.3380 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2010
[19]

D. Baumann, “Inﬂation,” in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary – 63 – Particle Physics: Physics of the Large and the Small , pp. 523–686. 2011. arXiv:0907.5424 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2011
[20]

X. Chen, “Primordial Non-Gaussianities from Inﬂation Models,” Adv. Astron. 2010 (2010) 638979, arXiv:1002.1416 [astro-ph.CO]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2010
[21]

Y. Wang, “Inﬂation, Cosmic Perturbations and Non-Gaussianities,” Commun. Theor. Phys. 62 (2014) 109–166, arXiv:1303.1523 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2014
[22]

D. Baumann and L. McAllister, Inﬂation and String Theory . Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 5, 2015. arXiv:1404.2601 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2015
[23]

L. Abbott, E. Farhi, and M. B. Wise, “Particle Production in the New Inﬂationary Cosmology,” Phys. Lett. B 117 (1982) 29

View on Pith 1982
[24]

A. Dolgov and A. D. Linde, “Baryon Asymmetry in Inﬂationary Universe,” Phys. Lett. B 116 (1982) 329

View on Pith 1982
[25]

A. Albrecht, P. J. Steinhardt, M. S. Turner, and F. Wilczek, “Reheating an Inﬂationary Universe,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 1437

View on Pith 1982
[26]

J. H. Traschen and R. H. Brandenberger, “Particle Production During Out-of-equilibrium Phase Transitions,” Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 2491–2504

View on Pith 1990
[27]

L. Kofman, A. D. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, “Reheating after inﬂation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 (1994) 3195–3198, arXiv:hep-th/9405187

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1994
[28]

Y. Shtanov, J. H. Traschen, and R. H. Brandenberger, “Universe reheating after inﬂation,” Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 5438–5455, arXiv:hep-ph/9407247

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1995
[29]

A. Sakharov, “Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe,” Sov. Phys. Usp. 34 no. 5, (1991) 392–393

View on Pith 1991
[30]

V. Kuzmin, V. Rubakov, and M. Shaposhnikov, “On the Anomalous Electroweak Baryon Number Nonconservation in the Early Universe,” Phys. Lett. B 155 (1985) 36

View on Pith 1985
[31]

M. Shaposhnikov, “Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe in Standard Electroweak Theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 287 (1987) 757–775

View on Pith 1987
[32]

A. G. Cohen, D. Kaplan, and A. Nelson, “Progress in electroweak baryogenesis,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 43 (1993) 27–70, arXiv:hep-ph/9302210

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1993
[33]

Supernova Search T eam Collaboration, A. G. Riess et al., “Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant,” Astron. J. 116 (1998) 1009–1038, arXiv:astro-ph/9805201

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998
[34]

S. M. Carroll, “The Cosmological constant,” Living Rev. Rel. 4 (2001) 1, arXiv:astro-ph/0004075. – 64 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[35]

P. Peebles and B. Ratra, “The Cosmological Constant and Dark Energy,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 (2003) 559–606, arXiv:astro-ph/0207347

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003
[36]

E. Witten, “Quantum gravity in de Sitter space,” in Strings 2001: International Conference. 6, 2001. arXiv:hep-th/0106109

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[37]

A. Strominger, “The dS / CFT correspondence,” JHEP 10 (2001) 034, arXiv:hep-th/0106113

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[38]

A. Maloney, E. Silverstein, and A. Strominger, “De Sitter space in noncritical string theory,” in Workshop on Conference on the Future of Theoretical Physics and Cosmology in Honor of Steven Hawking’s 60th Birthday , pp. 570–591. 5, 2002. arXiv:hep-th/0205316

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002
[39]

M. Alishahiha, A. Karch, E. Silverstein, and D. Tong, “The dS/dS correspondence,” AIP Conf. Proc. 743 no. 1, (2004) 393–409, arXiv:hep-th/0407125

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004
[40]

N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Maldacena, “Cosmological Collider Physics,” arXiv:1503.08043 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[41]

X. Dong, E. Silverstein, and G. Torroba, “De Sitter Holography and Entanglement Entropy,” JHEP 07 (2018) 050, arXiv:1804.08623 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018
[42]

A. Lewkowycz, J. Liu, E. Silverstein, and G. Torroba, “ TT and EE, with implications for (A)dS subregion encodings,” JHEP 04 (2020) 152, arXiv:1909.13808 [hep-th]

View on Pith arXiv 2020
[43]

Y. Chen, V. Gorbenko, and J. Maldacena, “Bra-ket wormholes in gravitationally prepared states,” arXiv:2007.16091 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2007
[44]

T. Hartman, Y. Jiang, and E. Shaghoulian, “Islands in cosmology,” arXiv:2008.01022 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2008
[45]

S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde, and S. P. Trivedi, “De Sitter vacua in string theory,” Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 046005, arXiv:hep-th/0301240

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003
[46]

J. Preskill, “Quantum computing in the nisq era and beyond,” Quantum 2 (2018) 79

View on Pith 2018
[47]

F. Arute, K. Arya, R. Babbush, D. Bacon, J. C. Bardin, R. Barends, R. Biswas, S. Boixo, F. G. Brandao, D. A. Buell, et al., “Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor,” Nature 574 no. 7779, (2019) 505–510

View on Pith 2019
[48]

S. P. Jordan, K. S. Lee, and J. Preskill, “Quantum Algorithms for Quantum Field Theories,” Science 336 (2012) 1130–1133, arXiv:1111.3633 [quant-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012
[49]

S. P. Jordan, K. S. Lee, and J. Preskill, “Quantum Computation of Scattering in Scalar Quantum Field Theories,” Quant. Inf. Comput. 14 (2014) 1014–1080, arXiv:1112.4833 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2014
[50]

S. P. Jordan, K. S. Lee, and J. Preskill, “Quantum algorithms for fermionic quantum ﬁeld theories,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1404.7115 (2014) . – 65 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2014
[51]

S. P. Jordan, H. Krovi, K. S. Lee, and J. Preskill, “Bqp-completeness of scattering in scalar quantum ﬁeld theory,” Quantum 2 (2018) 44

View on Pith 2018
[52]

J. Preskill, “Simulating quantum ﬁeld theory with a quantum computer,” PoS LA TTICE2018(2018) 024, arXiv:1811.10085 [hep-lat]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018
[53]

S. Weinberg, “Quantum contributions to cosmological correlations,” Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 043514, arXiv:hep-th/0506236

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[54]

L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga, “On Loops in Inﬂation,” JHEP 12 (2010) 008, arXiv:0912.2734 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2010
[55]

L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga, “On Loops in Inﬂation II: IR Eﬀects in Single Clock Inﬂation,” JHEP 01 (2013) 109, arXiv:1203.6354 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013
[56]

G. L. Pimentel, L. Senatore, and M. Zaldarriaga, “On Loops in Inﬂation III: Time Independence of zeta in Single Clock Inﬂation,” JHEP 07 (2012) 166, arXiv:1203.6651 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012
[57]

M. Gary, S. B. Giddings, and J. Penedones, “Local bulk S-matrix elements and CFT singularities,” Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 085005, arXiv:0903.4437 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2009
[58]

I. Heemskerk, J. Penedones, J. Polchinski, and J. Sully, “Holography from Conformal Field Theory,” JHEP 10 (2009) 079, arXiv:0907.0151 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2009
[59]

S. B. Giddings and R. A. Porto, “The Gravitational S-matrix,” Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 025002, arXiv:0908.0004 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2010
[60]

A. Fitzpatrick, E. Katz, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duﬃn, “Eﬀective Conformal Theory and the Flat-Space Limit of AdS,” JHEP 07 (2011) 023, arXiv:1007.2412 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2011
[61]

S. El-Showk and K. Papadodimas, “Emergent Spacetime and Holographic CFTs,” JHEP 10 (2012) 106, arXiv:1101.4163 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012
[62]

A. Fitzpatrick and J. Kaplan, “Analyticity and the Holographic S-Matrix,” JHEP 10 (2012) 127, arXiv:1111.6972 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012
[63]

A. Fitzpatrick and J. Kaplan, “Unitarity and the Holographic S-Matrix,” JHEP 10 (2012) 032, arXiv:1112.4845 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012
[64]

J. Maldacena, D. Simmons-Duﬃn, and A. Zhiboedov, “Looking for a bulk point,” JHEP 01 (2017) 013, arXiv:1509.03612 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017
[65]

A. Hamilton, D. N. Kabat, G. Lifschytz, and D. A. Lowe, “Local bulk operators in AdS/CFT: A Boundary view of horizons and locality,” Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 086003, arXiv:hep-th/0506118

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2006
[66]

D. Harlow, “TASI Lectures on the Emergence of Bulk Physics in AdS/CFT,” PoS T ASI2017(2018) 002, arXiv:1802.01040 [hep-th] . – 66 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018
[67]

T. Bunch and P. Davies, “Quantum Field Theory in de Sitter Space: Renormalization by Point Splitting,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A A360 (1978) 117–134

View on Pith 1978
[68]

T. Jacobson, S. Liberati, and D. Mattingly, “Lorentz violation at high energy: Concepts, phenomena and astrophysical constraints,” Annals Phys. 321 (2006) 150–196, arXiv:astro-ph/0505267

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2006
[69]

G. Gibbons and S. Hawking, “Cosmological Event Horizons, Thermodynamics, and Particle Creation,” Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2738–2751

View on Pith 1977
[70]

A. H. Guth and S.-Y. Pi, “The Quantum Mechanics of the Scalar Field in the New Inﬂationary Universe,” Phys. Rev. D 32 (1985) 1899–1920

View on Pith 1985
[71]

A. Albrecht, P. Ferreira, M. Joyce, and T. Prokopec, “Inﬂation and squeezed quantum states,” Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 4807–4820, arXiv:astro-ph/9303001

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1994
[72]

J. Lesgourgues, D. Polarski, and A. A. Starobinsky, “Quantum to classical transition of cosmological perturbations for nonvacuum initial states,” Nucl. Phys. B 497 (1997) 479–510, arXiv:gr-qc/9611019

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997
[73]

C. Kiefer, D. Polarski, and A. A. Starobinsky, “Quantum to classical transition for ﬂuctuations in the early universe,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 7 (1998) 455–462, arXiv:gr-qc/9802003

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998
[74]

J. Liu, C.-M. Sou, and Y. Wang, “Cosmic Decoherence: Massive Fields,” JHEP 10 (2016) 072, arXiv:1608.07909 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016
[75]

S. McArdle, S. Endo, A. Aspuru-Guzik, S. C. Benjamin, and X. Yuan, “Quantum computational chemistry,” Reviews of Modern Physics 92 no. 1, (2020) 015003

View on Pith 2020
[76]

J. Liu and Y. Xin, “Quantum simulation of quantum ﬁeld theories as quantum chemistry,” arXiv:2004.13234 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004
[77]

R. Easther, B. R. Greene, W. H. Kinney, and G. Shiu, “Inﬂation as a probe of short distance physics,” Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 103502, arXiv:hep-th/0104102

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[78]

H. Jiang, Y. Wang, and S. Zhou, “On the initial condition of inﬂationary ﬂuctuations,” JCAP 04 (2016) 041, arXiv:1601.01179 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016
[79]

A. G. Lewis and G. Vidal, “Classical Simulations of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime I: Fermionic Hawking-Hartle Vacua from a Staggered Lattice Scheme,” arXiv:1911.12978 [gr-qc]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1911
[80]

C. Burgess, L. Leblond, R. Holman, and S. Shandera, “Super-Hubble de Sitter Fluctuations and the Dynamical RG,” JCAP 03 (2010) 033, arXiv:0912.1608 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2010
[81]

R. C. Brower, C. V. Cogburn, A. L. Fitzpatrick, D. Howarth, and C.-I. Tan, “Lattice Setup for Quantum Field Theory in AdS 2,” arXiv:1912.07606 [hep-th] . – 67 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1912
[82]

D. Harlow, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford, and L. Susskind, “Tree-like structure of eternal inﬂation: A solvable model,” Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 063516, arXiv:1110.0496 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012
[83]

S. S. Gubser, J. Knaute, S. Parikh, A. Samberg, and P. Witaszczyk, “ p-adic AdS/CFT,” Commun. Math. Phys. 352 no. 3, (2017) 1019–1059, arXiv:1605.01061 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017
[84]

M. Heydeman, M. Marcolli, I. Saberi, and B. Stoica, “Tensor networks, p-adic ﬁelds, and algebraic curves: arithmetic and the AdS 3/CFT2 correspondence,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 22 (2018) 93–176, arXiv:1605.07639 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018
[85]

N. Bao, C. Cao, S. M. Carroll, and L. McAllister, “Quantum Circuit Cosmology: The Expansion of the Universe Since the First Qubit,” arXiv:1702.06959 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[86]

T. J. Osborne and D. E. Stiegemann, “Dynamics for holographic codes,” JHEP 04 (2020) 154, arXiv:1706.08823 [quant-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020
[87]

J. Martin and R. H. Brandenberger, “The TransPlanckian problem of inﬂationary cosmology,” Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 123501, arXiv:hep-th/0005209

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[88]

M. Gell-Mann and F. Low, “Bound states in quantum ﬁeld theory,” Phys. Rev. 84 (1951) 350–354

View on Pith 1951
[89]

A. Lucia, D. Poulin, J. Preskill, and T. Wang, “working in progress,”

View on Pith
[90]

D. A. Easson and T. Manton, “Stable Cosmic Time Crystals,” Phys. Rev. D 99 no. 4, (2019) 043507, arXiv:1802.03693 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019
[91]

A. Kitaev and W. A. Webb, “Wavefunction preparation and resampling using a quantum computer,” arXiv preprint arXiv:0801.0342 (2008)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2008
[92]

J. R. Bunch and J. E. Hopcroft, “Triangular factorization and inversion by fast matrix multiplication,” Mathematics of Computation 28 no. 125, (1974) 231–236

View on Pith 1974
[93]

D. Coppersmith and S. Winograd, “Matrix multiplication via arithmetic progressions,” in Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pp. 1–6. 1987

View on Pith 1987
[94]

A. M. Childs, Y. Su, M. C. Tran, N. Wiebe, and S. Zhu, “A theory of trotter error,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.08854 (2019)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019
[95]

A. Almheiri, X. Dong, and D. Harlow, “Bulk Locality and Quantum Error Correction in AdS/CFT,” JHEP 04 (2015) 163, arXiv:1411.7041 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2015
[96]

X. Dong, D. Harlow, and A. C. Wall, “Reconstruction of Bulk Operators within the Entanglement Wedge in Gauge-Gravity Duality,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 no. 2, (2016) 021601, arXiv:1601.05416 [hep-th] . – 68 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016
[97]

F. Pastawski, B. Yoshida, D. Harlow, and J. Preskill, “Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: Toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence,” JHEP 06 (2015) 149, arXiv:1503.06237 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2015
[98]

A. May, G. Penington, and J. Sorce, “Holographic scattering requires a connected entanglement wedge,” JHEP 20 (2020) 132, arXiv:1912.05649 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020
[99]

R. D. Somma, “Quantum simulations of one dimensional quantum systems,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.06319 (2015)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2015
[100]

A. Macridin, P. Spentzouris, J. Amundson, and R. Harnik, “Digital quantum computation of fermion-boson interacting systems,” Physical Review A 98 no. 4, (2018) 042312

View on Pith 2018
[101]

G. H. Low and I. L. Chuang, “Optimal hamiltonian simulation by quantum signal processing,” Physical review letters 118 no. 1, (2017) 010501

View on Pith 2017
[102]

K. Wan and I. Kim, “Fast digital methods for adiabatic state preparation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.04164 (2020)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020
[103]

H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, “On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland,” Nucl. Phys. B 766 (2007) 21–33, arXiv:hep-th/0605264

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2007
[104]

A. Bedroya and C. Vafa, “Trans-Planckian Censorship and the Swampland,” JHEP 09 (2020) 123, arXiv:1909.11063 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020
[105]

P. Agrawal, G. Obied, P. J. Steinhardt, and C. Vafa, “On the Cosmological Implications of the String Swampland,” Phys. Lett. B 784 (2018) 271–276, arXiv:1806.09718 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018
[106]

M. Hogarth, Predictability, computability, and spacetime. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 1996

View on Pith 1996
[107]

R. Geroch and J. B. Hartle, “Computability and physical theories,” Foundations of Physics 16 no. 6, (1986) 533–550

View on Pith 1986
[108]

A. Bouland, B. Feﬀerman, and U. Vazirani, “Computational pseudorandomness, the wormhole growth paradox, and constraints on the AdS/CFT duality,” arXiv:1910.14646 [quant-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1910
[109]

A. Gheorghiu and M. J. Hoban, “Estimating the entropy of shallow circuit outputs is hard,” arXiv:2002.12814 [quant-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002
[110]

L. Susskind, “Horizons Protect Church-Turing,” arXiv:2003.01807 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003
[111]

I. Kim, E. Tang, and J. Preskill, “The ghost in the radiation: Robust encodings of the black hole interior,” JHEP 20 (2020) 031, arXiv:2003.05451 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020
[112]

B. Yoshida, “Remarks on Black Hole Complexity Puzzle,” arXiv:2005.12491 [hep-th]. – 69 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[113]

E. Campbell, “Random compiler for fast hamiltonian simulation,” Physical review letters 123 no. 7, (2019) 070503

View on Pith 2019
[114]

L. M. Sieberer, T. Olsacher, A. Elben, M. Heyl, P. Hauke, F. Haake, and P. Zoller, “Digital quantum simulation, trotter errors, and quantum chaos of the kicked top,” npj Quantum Information 5 no. 1, (2019) 1–11

View on Pith 2019
[115]

C.-F. Chen, R. Kueng, J. A. Tropp, et al., “Quantum simulation via randomized product formulas: Low gate complexity with accuracy guarantees,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.11751 (2020)

View on Pith arXiv 2020
[116]

V. Hetherington and A. Milsted, “private communications,”

View on Pith
[117]

I. Danshita, M. Hanada, and M. Tezuka, “Creating and probing the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model with ultracold gases: Towards experimental studies of quantum gravity,” PTEP 2017 no. 8, (2017) 083I01, arXiv:1606.02454 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017
[118]

K. Landsman, C. Figgatt, T. Schuster, N. Linke, B. Yoshida, N. Yao, and C. Monroe, “Veriﬁed Quantum Information Scrambling,” Nature 567 no. 7746, (2019) 61–65, arXiv:1806.02807 [quant-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019
[119]

A. R. Brown, H. Gharibyan, S. Leichenauer, H. W. Lin, S. Nezami, G. Salton, L. Susskind, B. Swingle, and M. Walter, “Quantum Gravity in the Lab: Teleportation by Size and Traversable Wormholes,” arXiv:1911.06314 [quant-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1911
[120]

B. Kobrin, Z. Yang, G. D. Kahanamoku-Meyer, C. T. Olund, J. E. Moore, D. Stanford, and N. Y. Yao, “Many-Body Chaos in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Model,” arXiv:2002.05725 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002
[121]

L. Garcia-Alvarez, I. Egusquiza, L. Lamata, A. del Campo, J. Sonner, and E. Solano, “Digital Quantum Simulation of Minimal AdS/CFT,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 no. 4, (2017) 040501, arXiv:1607.08560 [quant-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017
[122]

R. Babbush, D. W. Berry, and H. Neven, “Quantum Simulation of the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Model by Asymmetric Qubitization,” Phys. Rev. A 99 no. 4, (2019) 040301, arXiv:1806.02793 [quant-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019
[123]

S. Xu, L. Susskind, Y. Su, and B. Swingle, “A Sparse Model of Quantum Holography,” arXiv:2008.02303 [cond-mat.str-el]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2008
[124]

P. O. Fedichev and U. R. Fischer, “’Cosmological’ quasiparticle production in harmonically trapped superﬂuid gases,” Phys. Rev. A 69 (2004) 033602, arXiv:cond-mat/0303063

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004
[125]

U. R. Fischer and R. Schutzhold, “Quantum simulation of cosmic inﬂation in two-component Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. A 70 (2004) 063615, arXiv:cond-mat/0406470. – 70 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004
[126]

S. Antonini and B. Swingle, “Cosmology at the end of the world,” Nature Phys. 16 no. 8, (2020) 881–886, arXiv:1907.06667 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020
[127]

X. Yuan, J. Sun, J. Liu, Q. Zhao, and Y. Zhou, “Quantum simulation with hybrid tensor networks,” arXiv:2007.00958 [quant-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2007
[128]

A. Ach´ ucarro and G. A. Palma, “The string swampland constraints require multi-ﬁeld inﬂation,” JCAP 02 (2019) 041, arXiv:1807.04390 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019
[129]

A. J. Tolley and M. Wyman, “The Gelaton Scenario: Equilateral non-Gaussianity from multi-ﬁeld dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 043502, arXiv:0910.1853 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2010
[130]

A. Achucarro, J.-O. Gong, S. Hardeman, G. A. Palma, and S. P. Patil, “Mass hierarchies and non-decoupling in multi-scalar ﬁeld dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 043502, arXiv:1005.3848 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2011
[131]

A. Achucarro, J.-O. Gong, S. Hardeman, G. A. Palma, and S. P. Patil, “Features of heavy physics in the CMB power spectrum,” JCAP 01 (2011) 030, arXiv:1010.3693 [hep-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2011
[132]

D. Wands, “Duality invariance of cosmological perturbation spectra,” Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 023507, arXiv:gr-qc/9809062

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[133]

F. Finelli and R. Brandenberger, “On the generation of a scale invariant spectrum of adiabatic ﬂuctuations in cosmological models with a contracting phase,” Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 103522, arXiv:hep-th/0112249

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002
[134]

J. Khoury, B. A. Ovrut, P. J. Steinhardt, and N. Turok, “The Ekpyrotic universe: Colliding branes and the origin of the hot big bang,” Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 123522, arXiv:hep-th/0103239

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[135]

J. Liu, J. Preskill, and B. Sahinoglu, “Simulating kink scattering in a quantum computer,” to appear . https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wOrPmO7lfutZlLEj-12JiMUAVg4nOdQr/view

View on Pith
[136]

A. Milsted, J. Liu, J. Preskill, and G. Vidal, “Simulating kink scattering in tensor networks,” to appear . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Om--8LsqFw

View on Pith
[137]

J. G. Russo and P. K. Townsend, “Late-time Cosmic Acceleration from Compactiﬁcation,” Class. Quant. Grav. 36 no. 9, (2019) 095008, arXiv:1811.03660 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019
[138]

J. G. Russo and P. K. Townsend, “Time-dependent compactiﬁcation to de Sitter space: a no-go theorem,” JHEP 06 (2019) 097, arXiv:1904.11967 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019
[139]

G. Obied, H. Ooguri, L. Spodyneiko, and C. Vafa, “De Sitter Space and the Swampland,” arXiv:1806.08362 [hep-th] . – 71 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[140]

E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space and holography,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253–291, arXiv:hep-th/9802150

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998
[141]

H. Ooguri, E. Palti, G. Shiu, and C. Vafa, “Distance and de Sitter Conjectures on the Swampland,” Phys. Lett. B 788 (2019) 180–184, arXiv:1810.05506 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019
[142]

S. Kachru and S. P. Trivedi, “A comment on eﬀective ﬁeld theories of ﬂux vacua,” Fortsch. Phys. 67 no. 1-2, (2019) 1800086, arXiv:1808.08971 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019
[143]

S. Aaronson, “NP-complete problems and physical reality,” arXiv:quant-ph/0502072

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[144]

J. D. Bekenstein, “A Universal Upper Bound on the Entropy to Energy Ratio for Bounded Systems,” Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 287

View on Pith 1981
[145]

P. Welch, “The extent of computation in Malament-Hogarth spacetimes,” arXiv:gr-qc/0609035

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[146]

P. Hayden and J. Preskill, “Black holes as mirrors: Quantum information in random subsystems,” JHEP 09 (2007) 120, arXiv:0708.4025 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2007
[147]

N. Y. Halpern, “Toward physical realizations of thermodynamic resource theories,” in Information and Interaction , pp. 135–166. Springer, 2017

View on Pith 2017
[148]

G. N. Felder and I. Tkachev, “LATTICEEASY: A Program for lattice simulations of scalar ﬁelds in an expanding universe,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 178 (2008) 929–932, arXiv:hep-ph/0011159

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2008
[149]

S. B. Bravyi and A. Y. Kitaev, “Fermionic quantum computation,” Annals of Physics 298 no. 1, (2002) 210–226

View on Pith 2002
[150]

Y.-A. Chen, A. Kapustin, and D. Radiˇ cevi´ c, “Exact bosonization in two spatial dimensions and a new class of lattice gauge theories,” Annals Phys. 393 (2018) 234–253, arXiv:1711.00515 [cond-mat.str-el]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018
[151]

Y.-A. Chen and A. Kapustin, “Bosonization in three spatial dimensions and a 2-form gauge theory,” Phys. Rev. B 100 no. 24, (2019) 245127, arXiv:1807.07081 [cond-mat.str-el]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019
[152]

Y.-A. Chen, “Exact bosonization in arbitrary dimensions,” arXiv:1911.00017 [cond-mat.str-el]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1911
[153]

A. Chatrchyan, K. T. Geier, M. K. Oberthaler, J. Berges, and P. Hauke, “Analog reheating of the early universe in the laboratory,” arXiv:2008.02290 [cond-mat.quant-gas]. – 72 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2008

How the literature uses it

10 arXiv papers cite this in 10 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 5 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 5 papers

In principle, quantum computers (both analog and digital) can simulate dynamics of quantum field theories at long timescales with polynomial costs [ref] , a topic which has recently attracted great interest [ref] .

Collisions of false-vacuum bubble walls in a quantum spin chain · Introduction · 0.85
Quantum simulation of quantum dynamics has been proposed long time ago [ref] and is developing rapidly in recent years [ref] .

Quantum Simulation of Light-Front QCD for Jet Quenching in Nuclear Environments · Introduction · 0.99
Since that work, digital quantum simulation in the context of quantum field theory has been attracting a lot of interest [ref] .

Quench dynamics of the Schwinger model via variational quantum algorithms · Introduction · 0.98

What it cites · 77 sentences without a confident label

Builds on 4 papers

In this paper, we initialize the study on extending the Jordan-Lee-Preskill algorithm for particle scattering [ref] towards inflationary spacetime.

Quantum Algorithms for Quantum Field Theories · Introduction · 1.00
In this paper, we initialize the study on extending the Jordan-Lee-Preskill algorithm for particle scattering [ref] towards inflationary spacetime.

Quantum Computation of Scattering in Scalar Quantum Field Theories · Introduction · 1.00
We discuss this transformation as a reduced case of the HKLL formula [ref] , which is usually appearing in AdS and involving both space and time. * We still need the Kitaev-Webb algorithm to prepare the free theory vacuum, but we don't need to excite the wavepacket, since our cosmological-motivated correlation functions are evaluated for the vacuum states. * In the adiabatic state preparation process, we start from the free theory at conformal time $τ_0$, and then we use adiabatic state preparation to construct the interacting vacuum at $τ_0$.

TASI Lectures on the Emergence of the Bulk in AdS/CFT · Our generalization of Jordan-Lee-Preskill · 0.81

Uses the method or tool of 4 papers

We could directly use the Kitaev-Webb algorithm [ref] to prepare the vacuum state.

Wavefunction preparation and resampling using a quantum computer · Initial state preparation by Kitaev and Webb · 1.00
The idea of [ref] is to bound the field value by $ϕ_max$ with discretize step size as $δϕ$ at each site, i.e., [equation] such that the original Hilbert space is truncated to be finite-dimensional, allowing to encode the scalar quantum field theory with finite qubits into quantum computers.

Quantum Algorithms for Quantum Field Theories · The original Jordan-Lee-Preskill algorithm · 0.91
The idea of [ref] is to bound the field value by $ϕ_max$ with discretize step size as $δϕ$ at each site, i.e., [equation] such that the original Hilbert space is truncated to be finite-dimensional, allowing to encode the scalar quantum field theory with finite qubits into quantum computers.

Quantum Computation of Scattering in Scalar Quantum Field Theories · The original Jordan-Lee-Preskill algorithm · 0.91

Cites as support 2 papers

This intuition is explicitly proved by the original paper of Jordan-Lee-Presklll [ref] .

Quantum Algorithms for Quantum Field Theories · Encoding bounds from the EFT scale · 1.00
This intuition is explicitly proved by the original paper of Jordan-Lee-Presklll [ref] .

Quantum Computation of Scattering in Scalar Quantum Field Theories · Encoding bounds from the EFT scale · 1.00

Cites as background 76 papers

The Jordan-Lee-Preskill algorithm [ref] could be regarded as a generic paradigm for simulating quantum field theories in the quantum computer.

Quantum Algorithms for Quantum Field Theories · The original Jordan-Lee-Preskill algorithm · 0.90
The Jordan-Lee-Preskill algorithm [ref] could be regarded as a generic paradigm for simulating quantum field theories in the quantum computer.

Quantum Computation of Scattering in Scalar Quantum Field Theories · The original Jordan-Lee-Preskill algorithm · 0.90
We will mostly use the notation from [ref] and [ref] .

A Theory of Trotter Error · Trotter simulation · 0.81

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [1]

A. H. Guth, “The Inﬂationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,” Adv. Ser. Astrophys. Cosmol. 3 (1987) 139–148

View on Pith 1987

[2] [2]

A. D. Linde, “A New Inﬂationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,” Adv. Ser. Astrophys. Cosmol. 3 (1987) 149–153

View on Pith 1987

[3] [3]

A. Albrecht and P. J. Steinhardt, “Cosmology for Grand Uniﬁed Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking,” Adv. Ser. Astrophys. Cosmol. 3 (1987) 158–161. – 62 –

View on Pith 1987

[4] [4]

A. A. Starobinsky, “A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,” Adv. Ser. Astrophys. Cosmol. 3 (1987) 130–133

View on Pith 1987

[5] [5]

K. Sato, “First Order Phase Transition of a Vacuum and Expansion of the Universe,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 195 (1981) 467–479

View on Pith 1981

[6] [6]

L. Fang, “Entropy Generation in the Early Universe by Dissipative Processes Near the Higgs’ Phase Transitions,” Phys. Lett. B 95 (1980) 154–156

View on Pith 1980

[7] [7]

V. F. Mukhanov and G. V. Chibisov, “Quantum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe,” JETP Lett. 33 (1981) 532–535

View on Pith 1981

[8] [8]

A. A. Starobinsky, “Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inﬂationary Universe Scenario and Generation of Perturbations,” Phys. Lett. B 117 (1982) 175–178

View on Pith 1982

[9] [9]

A. H. Guth and S. Pi, “Fluctuations in the New Inﬂationary Universe,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (1982) 1110–1113

View on Pith 1982

[10] [10]

J. M. Bardeen, P. J. Steinhardt, and M. S. Turner, “Spontaneous Creation of Almost Scale - Free Density Perturbations in an Inﬂationary Universe,” Phys. Rev. D 28 (1983) 679

View on Pith 1983

[11] [11]

V. F. Mukhanov, H. Feldman, and R. H. Brandenberger, “Theory of cosmological perturbations. Part 1. Classical perturbations. Part 2. Quantum theory of perturbations. Part 3. Extensions,” Phys. Rept. 215 (1992) 203–333

View on Pith 1992

[12] [12]

J. M. Maldacena, “Non-Gaussian features of primordial ﬂuctuations in single ﬁeld inﬂationary models,” JHEP 05 (2003) 013, arXiv:astro-ph/0210603

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003

[13] [13]

A. D. Linde, Particle physics and inﬂationary cosmology , vol. 5. 1990. arXiv:hep-th/0503203

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1990

[14] [14]

X. Chen, M.-x. Huang, S. Kachru, and G. Shiu, “Observational signatures and non-Gaussianities of general single ﬁeld inﬂation,” JCAP 01 (2007) 002, arXiv:hep-th/0605045

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2007

[15] [15]

C. Cheung, P. Creminelli, A. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, and L. Senatore, “The Eﬀective Field Theory of Inﬂation,” JHEP 03 (2008) 014, arXiv:0709.0293 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2008

[16] [16]

S. Weinberg, “Eﬀective Field Theory for Inﬂation,” Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 123541, arXiv:0804.4291 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2008

[17] [17]

K. A. Malik and D. Wands, “Cosmological perturbations,” Phys. Rept. 475 (2009) 1–51, arXiv:0809.4944 [astro-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2009

[18] [18]

X. Chen and Y. Wang, “Quasi-Single Field Inﬂation and Non-Gaussianities,” JCAP 04 (2010) 027, arXiv:0911.3380 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2010

[19] [19]

D. Baumann, “Inﬂation,” in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary – 63 – Particle Physics: Physics of the Large and the Small , pp. 523–686. 2011. arXiv:0907.5424 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2011

[20] [20]

X. Chen, “Primordial Non-Gaussianities from Inﬂation Models,” Adv. Astron. 2010 (2010) 638979, arXiv:1002.1416 [astro-ph.CO]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2010

[21] [21]

Y. Wang, “Inﬂation, Cosmic Perturbations and Non-Gaussianities,” Commun. Theor. Phys. 62 (2014) 109–166, arXiv:1303.1523 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2014

[22] [22]

D. Baumann and L. McAllister, Inﬂation and String Theory . Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 5, 2015. arXiv:1404.2601 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2015

[23] [23]

L. Abbott, E. Farhi, and M. B. Wise, “Particle Production in the New Inﬂationary Cosmology,” Phys. Lett. B 117 (1982) 29

View on Pith 1982

[24] [24]

A. Dolgov and A. D. Linde, “Baryon Asymmetry in Inﬂationary Universe,” Phys. Lett. B 116 (1982) 329

View on Pith 1982

[25] [25]

A. Albrecht, P. J. Steinhardt, M. S. Turner, and F. Wilczek, “Reheating an Inﬂationary Universe,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 1437

View on Pith 1982

[26] [26]

J. H. Traschen and R. H. Brandenberger, “Particle Production During Out-of-equilibrium Phase Transitions,” Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 2491–2504

View on Pith 1990

[27] [27]

L. Kofman, A. D. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, “Reheating after inﬂation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 (1994) 3195–3198, arXiv:hep-th/9405187

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1994

[28] [28]

Y. Shtanov, J. H. Traschen, and R. H. Brandenberger, “Universe reheating after inﬂation,” Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 5438–5455, arXiv:hep-ph/9407247

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1995

[29] [29]

A. Sakharov, “Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe,” Sov. Phys. Usp. 34 no. 5, (1991) 392–393

View on Pith 1991

[30] [30]

V. Kuzmin, V. Rubakov, and M. Shaposhnikov, “On the Anomalous Electroweak Baryon Number Nonconservation in the Early Universe,” Phys. Lett. B 155 (1985) 36

View on Pith 1985

[31] [31]

M. Shaposhnikov, “Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe in Standard Electroweak Theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 287 (1987) 757–775

View on Pith 1987

[32] [32]

A. G. Cohen, D. Kaplan, and A. Nelson, “Progress in electroweak baryogenesis,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 43 (1993) 27–70, arXiv:hep-ph/9302210

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1993

[33] [33]

Supernova Search T eam Collaboration, A. G. Riess et al., “Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant,” Astron. J. 116 (1998) 1009–1038, arXiv:astro-ph/9805201

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998

[34] [34]

S. M. Carroll, “The Cosmological constant,” Living Rev. Rel. 4 (2001) 1, arXiv:astro-ph/0004075. – 64 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[35] [35]

P. Peebles and B. Ratra, “The Cosmological Constant and Dark Energy,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 (2003) 559–606, arXiv:astro-ph/0207347

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003

[36] [36]

E. Witten, “Quantum gravity in de Sitter space,” in Strings 2001: International Conference. 6, 2001. arXiv:hep-th/0106109

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[37] [37]

A. Strominger, “The dS / CFT correspondence,” JHEP 10 (2001) 034, arXiv:hep-th/0106113

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[38] [38]

A. Maloney, E. Silverstein, and A. Strominger, “De Sitter space in noncritical string theory,” in Workshop on Conference on the Future of Theoretical Physics and Cosmology in Honor of Steven Hawking’s 60th Birthday , pp. 570–591. 5, 2002. arXiv:hep-th/0205316

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002

[39] [39]

M. Alishahiha, A. Karch, E. Silverstein, and D. Tong, “The dS/dS correspondence,” AIP Conf. Proc. 743 no. 1, (2004) 393–409, arXiv:hep-th/0407125

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

[40] [40]

N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Maldacena, “Cosmological Collider Physics,” arXiv:1503.08043 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[41] [41]

X. Dong, E. Silverstein, and G. Torroba, “De Sitter Holography and Entanglement Entropy,” JHEP 07 (2018) 050, arXiv:1804.08623 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018

[42] [42]

A. Lewkowycz, J. Liu, E. Silverstein, and G. Torroba, “ TT and EE, with implications for (A)dS subregion encodings,” JHEP 04 (2020) 152, arXiv:1909.13808 [hep-th]

View on Pith arXiv 2020

[43] [43]

Y. Chen, V. Gorbenko, and J. Maldacena, “Bra-ket wormholes in gravitationally prepared states,” arXiv:2007.16091 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2007

[44] [44]

T. Hartman, Y. Jiang, and E. Shaghoulian, “Islands in cosmology,” arXiv:2008.01022 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2008

[45] [45]

S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde, and S. P. Trivedi, “De Sitter vacua in string theory,” Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 046005, arXiv:hep-th/0301240

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003

[46] [46]

J. Preskill, “Quantum computing in the nisq era and beyond,” Quantum 2 (2018) 79

View on Pith 2018

[47] [47]

F. Arute, K. Arya, R. Babbush, D. Bacon, J. C. Bardin, R. Barends, R. Biswas, S. Boixo, F. G. Brandao, D. A. Buell, et al., “Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor,” Nature 574 no. 7779, (2019) 505–510

View on Pith 2019

[48] [48]

S. P. Jordan, K. S. Lee, and J. Preskill, “Quantum Algorithms for Quantum Field Theories,” Science 336 (2012) 1130–1133, arXiv:1111.3633 [quant-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012

[49] [49]

S. P. Jordan, K. S. Lee, and J. Preskill, “Quantum Computation of Scattering in Scalar Quantum Field Theories,” Quant. Inf. Comput. 14 (2014) 1014–1080, arXiv:1112.4833 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2014

[50] [50]

S. P. Jordan, K. S. Lee, and J. Preskill, “Quantum algorithms for fermionic quantum ﬁeld theories,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1404.7115 (2014) . – 65 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2014

[51] [51]

S. P. Jordan, H. Krovi, K. S. Lee, and J. Preskill, “Bqp-completeness of scattering in scalar quantum ﬁeld theory,” Quantum 2 (2018) 44

View on Pith 2018

[52] [52]

J. Preskill, “Simulating quantum ﬁeld theory with a quantum computer,” PoS LA TTICE2018(2018) 024, arXiv:1811.10085 [hep-lat]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018

[53] [53]

S. Weinberg, “Quantum contributions to cosmological correlations,” Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 043514, arXiv:hep-th/0506236

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[54] [54]

L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga, “On Loops in Inﬂation,” JHEP 12 (2010) 008, arXiv:0912.2734 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2010

[55] [55]

L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga, “On Loops in Inﬂation II: IR Eﬀects in Single Clock Inﬂation,” JHEP 01 (2013) 109, arXiv:1203.6354 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013

[56] [56]

G. L. Pimentel, L. Senatore, and M. Zaldarriaga, “On Loops in Inﬂation III: Time Independence of zeta in Single Clock Inﬂation,” JHEP 07 (2012) 166, arXiv:1203.6651 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012

[57] [57]

M. Gary, S. B. Giddings, and J. Penedones, “Local bulk S-matrix elements and CFT singularities,” Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 085005, arXiv:0903.4437 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2009

[58] [58]

I. Heemskerk, J. Penedones, J. Polchinski, and J. Sully, “Holography from Conformal Field Theory,” JHEP 10 (2009) 079, arXiv:0907.0151 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2009

[59] [59]

S. B. Giddings and R. A. Porto, “The Gravitational S-matrix,” Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 025002, arXiv:0908.0004 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2010

[60] [60]

A. Fitzpatrick, E. Katz, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duﬃn, “Eﬀective Conformal Theory and the Flat-Space Limit of AdS,” JHEP 07 (2011) 023, arXiv:1007.2412 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2011

[61] [61]

S. El-Showk and K. Papadodimas, “Emergent Spacetime and Holographic CFTs,” JHEP 10 (2012) 106, arXiv:1101.4163 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012

[62] [62]

A. Fitzpatrick and J. Kaplan, “Analyticity and the Holographic S-Matrix,” JHEP 10 (2012) 127, arXiv:1111.6972 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012

[63] [63]

A. Fitzpatrick and J. Kaplan, “Unitarity and the Holographic S-Matrix,” JHEP 10 (2012) 032, arXiv:1112.4845 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012

[64] [64]

J. Maldacena, D. Simmons-Duﬃn, and A. Zhiboedov, “Looking for a bulk point,” JHEP 01 (2017) 013, arXiv:1509.03612 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017

[65] [65]

A. Hamilton, D. N. Kabat, G. Lifschytz, and D. A. Lowe, “Local bulk operators in AdS/CFT: A Boundary view of horizons and locality,” Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 086003, arXiv:hep-th/0506118

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2006

[66] [66]

D. Harlow, “TASI Lectures on the Emergence of Bulk Physics in AdS/CFT,” PoS T ASI2017(2018) 002, arXiv:1802.01040 [hep-th] . – 66 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018

[67] [67]

T. Bunch and P. Davies, “Quantum Field Theory in de Sitter Space: Renormalization by Point Splitting,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A A360 (1978) 117–134

View on Pith 1978

[68] [68]

T. Jacobson, S. Liberati, and D. Mattingly, “Lorentz violation at high energy: Concepts, phenomena and astrophysical constraints,” Annals Phys. 321 (2006) 150–196, arXiv:astro-ph/0505267

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2006

[69] [69]

G. Gibbons and S. Hawking, “Cosmological Event Horizons, Thermodynamics, and Particle Creation,” Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2738–2751

View on Pith 1977

[70] [70]

A. H. Guth and S.-Y. Pi, “The Quantum Mechanics of the Scalar Field in the New Inﬂationary Universe,” Phys. Rev. D 32 (1985) 1899–1920

View on Pith 1985

[71] [71]

A. Albrecht, P. Ferreira, M. Joyce, and T. Prokopec, “Inﬂation and squeezed quantum states,” Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 4807–4820, arXiv:astro-ph/9303001

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1994

[72] [72]

J. Lesgourgues, D. Polarski, and A. A. Starobinsky, “Quantum to classical transition of cosmological perturbations for nonvacuum initial states,” Nucl. Phys. B 497 (1997) 479–510, arXiv:gr-qc/9611019

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997

[73] [73]

C. Kiefer, D. Polarski, and A. A. Starobinsky, “Quantum to classical transition for ﬂuctuations in the early universe,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 7 (1998) 455–462, arXiv:gr-qc/9802003

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998

[74] [74]

J. Liu, C.-M. Sou, and Y. Wang, “Cosmic Decoherence: Massive Fields,” JHEP 10 (2016) 072, arXiv:1608.07909 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016

[75] [75]

S. McArdle, S. Endo, A. Aspuru-Guzik, S. C. Benjamin, and X. Yuan, “Quantum computational chemistry,” Reviews of Modern Physics 92 no. 1, (2020) 015003

View on Pith 2020

[76] [76]

J. Liu and Y. Xin, “Quantum simulation of quantum ﬁeld theories as quantum chemistry,” arXiv:2004.13234 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

[77] [77]

R. Easther, B. R. Greene, W. H. Kinney, and G. Shiu, “Inﬂation as a probe of short distance physics,” Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 103502, arXiv:hep-th/0104102

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[78] [78]

H. Jiang, Y. Wang, and S. Zhou, “On the initial condition of inﬂationary ﬂuctuations,” JCAP 04 (2016) 041, arXiv:1601.01179 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016

[79] [79]

A. G. Lewis and G. Vidal, “Classical Simulations of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime I: Fermionic Hawking-Hartle Vacua from a Staggered Lattice Scheme,” arXiv:1911.12978 [gr-qc]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1911

[80] [80]

C. Burgess, L. Leblond, R. Holman, and S. Shandera, “Super-Hubble de Sitter Fluctuations and the Dynamical RG,” JCAP 03 (2010) 033, arXiv:0912.1608 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2010

[81] [81]

R. C. Brower, C. V. Cogburn, A. L. Fitzpatrick, D. Howarth, and C.-I. Tan, “Lattice Setup for Quantum Field Theory in AdS 2,” arXiv:1912.07606 [hep-th] . – 67 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1912

[82] [82]

D. Harlow, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford, and L. Susskind, “Tree-like structure of eternal inﬂation: A solvable model,” Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 063516, arXiv:1110.0496 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012

[83] [83]

S. S. Gubser, J. Knaute, S. Parikh, A. Samberg, and P. Witaszczyk, “ p-adic AdS/CFT,” Commun. Math. Phys. 352 no. 3, (2017) 1019–1059, arXiv:1605.01061 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017

[84] [84]

M. Heydeman, M. Marcolli, I. Saberi, and B. Stoica, “Tensor networks, p-adic ﬁelds, and algebraic curves: arithmetic and the AdS 3/CFT2 correspondence,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 22 (2018) 93–176, arXiv:1605.07639 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018

[85] [85]

N. Bao, C. Cao, S. M. Carroll, and L. McAllister, “Quantum Circuit Cosmology: The Expansion of the Universe Since the First Qubit,” arXiv:1702.06959 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[86] [86]

T. J. Osborne and D. E. Stiegemann, “Dynamics for holographic codes,” JHEP 04 (2020) 154, arXiv:1706.08823 [quant-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020

[87] [87]

J. Martin and R. H. Brandenberger, “The TransPlanckian problem of inﬂationary cosmology,” Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 123501, arXiv:hep-th/0005209

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[88] [88]

M. Gell-Mann and F. Low, “Bound states in quantum ﬁeld theory,” Phys. Rev. 84 (1951) 350–354

View on Pith 1951

[89] [89]

A. Lucia, D. Poulin, J. Preskill, and T. Wang, “working in progress,”

View on Pith

[90] [90]

D. A. Easson and T. Manton, “Stable Cosmic Time Crystals,” Phys. Rev. D 99 no. 4, (2019) 043507, arXiv:1802.03693 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019

[91] [91]

A. Kitaev and W. A. Webb, “Wavefunction preparation and resampling using a quantum computer,” arXiv preprint arXiv:0801.0342 (2008)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2008

[92] [92]

J. R. Bunch and J. E. Hopcroft, “Triangular factorization and inversion by fast matrix multiplication,” Mathematics of Computation 28 no. 125, (1974) 231–236

View on Pith 1974

[93] [93]

D. Coppersmith and S. Winograd, “Matrix multiplication via arithmetic progressions,” in Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pp. 1–6. 1987

View on Pith 1987

[94] [94]

A. M. Childs, Y. Su, M. C. Tran, N. Wiebe, and S. Zhu, “A theory of trotter error,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.08854 (2019)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019

[95] [95]

A. Almheiri, X. Dong, and D. Harlow, “Bulk Locality and Quantum Error Correction in AdS/CFT,” JHEP 04 (2015) 163, arXiv:1411.7041 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2015

[96] [96]

X. Dong, D. Harlow, and A. C. Wall, “Reconstruction of Bulk Operators within the Entanglement Wedge in Gauge-Gravity Duality,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 no. 2, (2016) 021601, arXiv:1601.05416 [hep-th] . – 68 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016

[97] [97]

F. Pastawski, B. Yoshida, D. Harlow, and J. Preskill, “Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: Toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence,” JHEP 06 (2015) 149, arXiv:1503.06237 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2015

[98] [98]

A. May, G. Penington, and J. Sorce, “Holographic scattering requires a connected entanglement wedge,” JHEP 20 (2020) 132, arXiv:1912.05649 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020

[99] [99]

R. D. Somma, “Quantum simulations of one dimensional quantum systems,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.06319 (2015)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2015

[100] [100]

A. Macridin, P. Spentzouris, J. Amundson, and R. Harnik, “Digital quantum computation of fermion-boson interacting systems,” Physical Review A 98 no. 4, (2018) 042312

View on Pith 2018

[101] [101]

G. H. Low and I. L. Chuang, “Optimal hamiltonian simulation by quantum signal processing,” Physical review letters 118 no. 1, (2017) 010501

View on Pith 2017

[102] [102]

K. Wan and I. Kim, “Fast digital methods for adiabatic state preparation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.04164 (2020)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020

[103] [103]

H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, “On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland,” Nucl. Phys. B 766 (2007) 21–33, arXiv:hep-th/0605264

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2007

[104] [104]

A. Bedroya and C. Vafa, “Trans-Planckian Censorship and the Swampland,” JHEP 09 (2020) 123, arXiv:1909.11063 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020

[105] [105]

P. Agrawal, G. Obied, P. J. Steinhardt, and C. Vafa, “On the Cosmological Implications of the String Swampland,” Phys. Lett. B 784 (2018) 271–276, arXiv:1806.09718 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018

[106] [106]

M. Hogarth, Predictability, computability, and spacetime. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 1996

View on Pith 1996

[107] [107]

R. Geroch and J. B. Hartle, “Computability and physical theories,” Foundations of Physics 16 no. 6, (1986) 533–550

View on Pith 1986

[108] [108]

A. Bouland, B. Feﬀerman, and U. Vazirani, “Computational pseudorandomness, the wormhole growth paradox, and constraints on the AdS/CFT duality,” arXiv:1910.14646 [quant-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1910

[109] [109]

A. Gheorghiu and M. J. Hoban, “Estimating the entropy of shallow circuit outputs is hard,” arXiv:2002.12814 [quant-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002

[110] [110]

L. Susskind, “Horizons Protect Church-Turing,” arXiv:2003.01807 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003

[111] [111]

I. Kim, E. Tang, and J. Preskill, “The ghost in the radiation: Robust encodings of the black hole interior,” JHEP 20 (2020) 031, arXiv:2003.05451 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020

[112] [112]

B. Yoshida, “Remarks on Black Hole Complexity Puzzle,” arXiv:2005.12491 [hep-th]. – 69 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[113] [113]

E. Campbell, “Random compiler for fast hamiltonian simulation,” Physical review letters 123 no. 7, (2019) 070503

View on Pith 2019

[114] [114]

L. M. Sieberer, T. Olsacher, A. Elben, M. Heyl, P. Hauke, F. Haake, and P. Zoller, “Digital quantum simulation, trotter errors, and quantum chaos of the kicked top,” npj Quantum Information 5 no. 1, (2019) 1–11

View on Pith 2019

[115] [115]

C.-F. Chen, R. Kueng, J. A. Tropp, et al., “Quantum simulation via randomized product formulas: Low gate complexity with accuracy guarantees,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.11751 (2020)

View on Pith arXiv 2020

[116] [116]

V. Hetherington and A. Milsted, “private communications,”

View on Pith

[117] [117]

I. Danshita, M. Hanada, and M. Tezuka, “Creating and probing the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model with ultracold gases: Towards experimental studies of quantum gravity,” PTEP 2017 no. 8, (2017) 083I01, arXiv:1606.02454 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017

[118] [118]

K. Landsman, C. Figgatt, T. Schuster, N. Linke, B. Yoshida, N. Yao, and C. Monroe, “Veriﬁed Quantum Information Scrambling,” Nature 567 no. 7746, (2019) 61–65, arXiv:1806.02807 [quant-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019

[119] [119]

A. R. Brown, H. Gharibyan, S. Leichenauer, H. W. Lin, S. Nezami, G. Salton, L. Susskind, B. Swingle, and M. Walter, “Quantum Gravity in the Lab: Teleportation by Size and Traversable Wormholes,” arXiv:1911.06314 [quant-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1911

[120] [120]

B. Kobrin, Z. Yang, G. D. Kahanamoku-Meyer, C. T. Olund, J. E. Moore, D. Stanford, and N. Y. Yao, “Many-Body Chaos in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Model,” arXiv:2002.05725 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002

[121] [121]

L. Garcia-Alvarez, I. Egusquiza, L. Lamata, A. del Campo, J. Sonner, and E. Solano, “Digital Quantum Simulation of Minimal AdS/CFT,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 no. 4, (2017) 040501, arXiv:1607.08560 [quant-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017

[122] [122]

R. Babbush, D. W. Berry, and H. Neven, “Quantum Simulation of the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Model by Asymmetric Qubitization,” Phys. Rev. A 99 no. 4, (2019) 040301, arXiv:1806.02793 [quant-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019

[123] [123]

S. Xu, L. Susskind, Y. Su, and B. Swingle, “A Sparse Model of Quantum Holography,” arXiv:2008.02303 [cond-mat.str-el]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2008

[124] [124]

P. O. Fedichev and U. R. Fischer, “’Cosmological’ quasiparticle production in harmonically trapped superﬂuid gases,” Phys. Rev. A 69 (2004) 033602, arXiv:cond-mat/0303063

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

[125] [125]

U. R. Fischer and R. Schutzhold, “Quantum simulation of cosmic inﬂation in two-component Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. A 70 (2004) 063615, arXiv:cond-mat/0406470. – 70 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

[126] [126]

S. Antonini and B. Swingle, “Cosmology at the end of the world,” Nature Phys. 16 no. 8, (2020) 881–886, arXiv:1907.06667 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020

[127] [127]

X. Yuan, J. Sun, J. Liu, Q. Zhao, and Y. Zhou, “Quantum simulation with hybrid tensor networks,” arXiv:2007.00958 [quant-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2007

[128] [128]

A. Ach´ ucarro and G. A. Palma, “The string swampland constraints require multi-ﬁeld inﬂation,” JCAP 02 (2019) 041, arXiv:1807.04390 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019

[129] [129]

A. J. Tolley and M. Wyman, “The Gelaton Scenario: Equilateral non-Gaussianity from multi-ﬁeld dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 043502, arXiv:0910.1853 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2010

[130] [130]

A. Achucarro, J.-O. Gong, S. Hardeman, G. A. Palma, and S. P. Patil, “Mass hierarchies and non-decoupling in multi-scalar ﬁeld dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 043502, arXiv:1005.3848 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2011

[131] [131]

A. Achucarro, J.-O. Gong, S. Hardeman, G. A. Palma, and S. P. Patil, “Features of heavy physics in the CMB power spectrum,” JCAP 01 (2011) 030, arXiv:1010.3693 [hep-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2011

[132] [132]

D. Wands, “Duality invariance of cosmological perturbation spectra,” Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 023507, arXiv:gr-qc/9809062

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[133] [133]

F. Finelli and R. Brandenberger, “On the generation of a scale invariant spectrum of adiabatic ﬂuctuations in cosmological models with a contracting phase,” Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 103522, arXiv:hep-th/0112249

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002

[134] [134]

J. Khoury, B. A. Ovrut, P. J. Steinhardt, and N. Turok, “The Ekpyrotic universe: Colliding branes and the origin of the hot big bang,” Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 123522, arXiv:hep-th/0103239

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[135] [135]

J. Liu, J. Preskill, and B. Sahinoglu, “Simulating kink scattering in a quantum computer,” to appear . https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wOrPmO7lfutZlLEj-12JiMUAVg4nOdQr/view

View on Pith

[136] [136]

A. Milsted, J. Liu, J. Preskill, and G. Vidal, “Simulating kink scattering in tensor networks,” to appear . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Om--8LsqFw

View on Pith

[137] [137]

J. G. Russo and P. K. Townsend, “Late-time Cosmic Acceleration from Compactiﬁcation,” Class. Quant. Grav. 36 no. 9, (2019) 095008, arXiv:1811.03660 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019

[138] [138]

J. G. Russo and P. K. Townsend, “Time-dependent compactiﬁcation to de Sitter space: a no-go theorem,” JHEP 06 (2019) 097, arXiv:1904.11967 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019

[139] [139]

G. Obied, H. Ooguri, L. Spodyneiko, and C. Vafa, “De Sitter Space and the Swampland,” arXiv:1806.08362 [hep-th] . – 71 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[140] [140]

E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space and holography,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253–291, arXiv:hep-th/9802150

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998

[141] [141]

H. Ooguri, E. Palti, G. Shiu, and C. Vafa, “Distance and de Sitter Conjectures on the Swampland,” Phys. Lett. B 788 (2019) 180–184, arXiv:1810.05506 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019

[142] [142]

S. Kachru and S. P. Trivedi, “A comment on eﬀective ﬁeld theories of ﬂux vacua,” Fortsch. Phys. 67 no. 1-2, (2019) 1800086, arXiv:1808.08971 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019

[143] [143]

S. Aaronson, “NP-complete problems and physical reality,” arXiv:quant-ph/0502072

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[144] [144]

J. D. Bekenstein, “A Universal Upper Bound on the Entropy to Energy Ratio for Bounded Systems,” Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 287

View on Pith 1981

[145] [145]

P. Welch, “The extent of computation in Malament-Hogarth spacetimes,” arXiv:gr-qc/0609035

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[146] [146]

P. Hayden and J. Preskill, “Black holes as mirrors: Quantum information in random subsystems,” JHEP 09 (2007) 120, arXiv:0708.4025 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2007

[147] [147]

N. Y. Halpern, “Toward physical realizations of thermodynamic resource theories,” in Information and Interaction , pp. 135–166. Springer, 2017

View on Pith 2017

[148] [148]

G. N. Felder and I. Tkachev, “LATTICEEASY: A Program for lattice simulations of scalar ﬁelds in an expanding universe,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 178 (2008) 929–932, arXiv:hep-ph/0011159

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2008

[149] [149]

S. B. Bravyi and A. Y. Kitaev, “Fermionic quantum computation,” Annals of Physics 298 no. 1, (2002) 210–226

View on Pith 2002

[150] [150]

Y.-A. Chen, A. Kapustin, and D. Radiˇ cevi´ c, “Exact bosonization in two spatial dimensions and a new class of lattice gauge theories,” Annals Phys. 393 (2018) 234–253, arXiv:1711.00515 [cond-mat.str-el]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018

[151] [151]

Y.-A. Chen and A. Kapustin, “Bosonization in three spatial dimensions and a 2-form gauge theory,” Phys. Rev. B 100 no. 24, (2019) 245127, arXiv:1807.07081 [cond-mat.str-el]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019

[152] [152]

Y.-A. Chen, “Exact bosonization in arbitrary dimensions,” arXiv:1911.00017 [cond-mat.str-el]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1911

[153] [153]

A. Chatrchyan, K. T. Geier, M. K. Oberthaler, J. Berges, and P. Hauke, “Analog reheating of the early universe in the laboratory,” arXiv:2008.02290 [cond-mat.quant-gas]. – 72 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2008