Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 85 references

Monodromy defects in Chern-Simons theory are labeled by twisted affine algebras and dual to orientifolds that turn oriented topological strings into unoriented ones.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-10 23:43 UTC pith:BJVY7V5C

load-bearing objection Clean algebraic construction of C-monodromy defects plus a parameter-free match that finally gives the orphan Ωσ+ orientifold a Chern-Simons dual. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.06669 v1 pith:BJVY7V5C submitted 2026-07-07 hep-th cond-mat.str-elmath-phmath.MP

Monodromy defects in Chern-Simons theory and Holography

Federico Ambrosino , Jaume Gomis , Suriyah Rajalingam Kannagi This is my paper
classification hep-th cond-mat.str-elmath-phmath.MP MSC 81T4557R5617B6781T30 PACS 11.15.Yc11.25.Tq02.20.Sv
keywords monodromy defectsChern-Simons theorytwisted affine Lie algebrastopological stringsorientifoldsGopakumar-Vafa dualityZ2-crossed braided categoriesholography
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Chern-Simons theories with charge conjugation admit a new class of codimension-two observables: monodromy defects around which fields return to themselves only up to charge conjugation. Ordinary Wilson loops are labeled by integrable representations of untwisted affine Lie algebras; these monodromy defects are labeled by integrable representations of the corresponding twisted affine algebras. Together the two families form a Z2-crossed braided tensor category whose modular and fusion data give exact correlation functions of mixed Wilson-line and monodromy-defect networks. In the large-N dual, inserting the lightest monodromy defect replaces the resolved-conifold background of Gopakumar-Vafa duality by a specific orientifold of that geometry, converting oriented strings into unoriented strings; every excited monodromy defect is then realized as a representation-determined collection of branes in the same orientifold. The construction therefore supplies a physical realization of every algebra in Kac's classification of affine Lie algebras and identifies the previously missing gauge-theory dual of the Ωσ+ orientifold of the resolved conifold.

Core claim

In Chern-Simons theories with charge conjugation, line defects consist of Wilson lines labeled by untwisted affine integrable representations and monodromy defects labeled by twisted affine integrable representations; their correlators are controlled by the modular S-matrices of both algebras. Holographically, the lightest monodromy defect in SU(N)k is dual to a pure Ωσ+ orientifold of the resolved conifold (SO or Sp projection fixed by the parities of N and k), while non-vacuum monodromy defects are dual to that orientifold plus a collection of branes or antibranes whose content is fixed by the twisted representation that labels the defect.

What carries the argument

The modular S-matrices S^(1,1) of the untwisted affine algebra and S^(C,1) of the C-twisted affine algebra, which supply quantum dimensions of Wilson lines and monodromy defects and whose small-q expansions match the free energies of oriented topological strings and of the Ωσ+ orientifolds of the resolved conifold.

Load-bearing premise

The representations that minimize the twisted modular matrix element are dual to pure orientifold backgrounds with no extra branes, identified uniquely by matching free-energy expansions including constant-map and crosscap terms.

What would settle it

An exact evaluation of the unnormalized vacuum monodromy-defect expectation value in SU(N)k for small N and k that fails to reproduce the closed topological-string partition function of the claimed Ωσ+ orientifold, including its constant-map and even-winding crosscap contributions.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Every affine Lie algebra in Kac's classification now appears as the label set of a concrete line defect in Chern-Simons theory.
  • The previously orphan Ωσ+ orientifold of the resolved conifold acquires a dual interpretation as a vacuum monodromy defect of SU(N)k Chern-Simons theory.
  • Exact correlators of arbitrary networks of Wilson lines and monodromy defects are computable from the fusion rules of the Z2-crossed braided tensor category.
  • Excited monodromy defects give a complete dictionary between twisted integrable representations and brane configurations in orientifolded topological string theory.
  • The same modular data determine new, charge-conjugation-refined invariants of knots and links decorated by both types of defects.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Monodromy defects for the quantum symmetries of Chern-Simons theories should admit analogous duals, possibly involving more exotic string backgrounds or fluxed orientifolds.
  • A pure closed-string bubbling Calabi-Yau description of the full family of monodromy defects should exist once the back-reaction of the dual branes and orientifold plane is included.
  • The Z2-crossed category structure suggests that gauging charge conjugation produces a new modular tensor category whose anyons are bound states of Wilson lines and monodromy defects.
  • The same dictionary should extend to monodromy defects of Spin(2N)k, completing the holographic map for all classical groups that admit outer automorphisms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs codimension-two C-monodromy defects in Chern–Simons theories with charge conjugation symmetry. These defects are labeled by integrable representations of the corresponding twisted affine Lie algebras g^(2)_k, while ordinary Wilson lines remain labeled by untwisted g_k. Together they form a Z_2-crossed braided tensor category whose modular and fusion data (S^(1,1), S^(C,1) and Verlinde-type formulae) determine exact correlators. For SU(N)_k the authors compute the exact unknot expectation values via the twisted modular matrices, expand them at small q, and match the vacuum defects to specific Ωσ_+ orientifolds of the resolved conifold (with SO/Sp crosscap signs and flux shifts fixed by the parities of N and k). Excited defects are then realized as collections of branes/antibranes (with images) in those orientifold backgrounds, with content fixed by the Young-tableau data of the twisted representation. A topological-vertex rule for the Ωσ_+ projection is also supplied.

Significance. If correct, the work supplies a physical realization of every algebra in Kac’s classification of affine Lie algebras inside Chern–Simons theory, and completes the Gopakumar–Vafa dictionary by giving a dual for the previously missing Ωσ_+ orientifold of the resolved conifold. The matching is parameter-free, covers all parity cases of N and k, and is independently corroborated by constant-map diagnostics (RP^2 and Σ_{0,3} terms) and by the new topological-vertex rules. The algebraic construction of the Z_2-crossed category and the explicit holographic dictionary for both vacuum and excited monodromy defects are substantial additions to the literature on symmetry-enriched TQFTs and topological strings.

major comments (2)
  1. The identification of vacuum monodromy defects with pure Ωσ_+ orientifolds rests on the claim that the a* that minimize S^(C,1)_a0 (Table 9, Appendix B) are dual to backgrounds with no extra branes. While the free-energy match (eqs. 4.26, 4.38, 4.44, 4.50 versus 4.65 and D.36) is impressive and covers all parity cases, a short uniqueness argument would strengthen the dictionary: are there other closed-string backgrounds (or other flux assignments) that could reproduce the same even-winding crosscap series and constant-map terms? A one-paragraph discussion of this point in §4.2 would make the central holographic claim more robust.
  2. Section 4.3 and Tables 11–12 give a complete brane/image dictionary for excited defects, including the delicate Möbius–annulus cancellations that distinguish SO from Sp projections. The cancellations are checked case-by-case; a compact general formula (or a short proof that the relative signs always cancel or add exactly as required by the Chan–Paton choice) would make the dictionary more transparent and less dependent on exhaustive case analysis.
minor comments (4)
  1. Notation for the two S-matrices is occasionally overloaded (S^(1,1) versus S^(C,1)); a short glossary or consistent subscripting would help the reader.
  2. Table 1 and Table 10 duplicate essentially the same information; one could be moved to an appendix or merged.
  3. A few typos appear in the appendices (e.g., “momodromy”, “parition”, “Mobiüs”). A careful proof-reading pass is recommended.
  4. The topological-vertex rules of §4.4 are new and useful; a brief comparison with the existing real-vertex literature (Krefl–Walcher et al.) would help place them in context.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: CS amplitudes from independent twisted modular data match known (or newly derived) unoriented string free energies by construction-free expansion.

full rationale

The paper constructs monodromy defects from the representation theory of twisted affine Lie algebras (Kac) and computes their unknot amplitudes from the modular S-matrices S^(C,1)_aµ (eqs. 4.5–4.9, 2.42). The small-q expansions of the vacuum cases (Sec. 4.1) reproduce the independently known free energies of Ωσ± orientifolds of the resolved conifold (eq. 4.65, including even-winding crosscaps, SO/Sp signs, flux shifts ±gs, and constant-map terms with RP2 and Σ0,3 contributions in App. D.4). Excited defects then match brane/image configurations whose content is fixed by the Young-tableau data of the twisted representation (Tables 11–12). The topological-vertex rules of Sec. 4.4 supply an independent closed-form check. No parameters are fitted to the target amplitudes; the matching is parameter-free across all parities of N and k. Self-citations are to standard external results (Gopakumar–Vafa, Kac, topological vertex, Sinha–Vafa) that have independent derivations. The only soft spot is the natural dictionary identification of a* minimizers with pure orientifolds, which is a non-tautological matching rather than a definitional reduction. Score 1 reflects a clean, self-contained derivation chain with no circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 2 invented entities

The paper rests on standard representation theory of affine Lie algebras (Kac), the modular tensor category of Chern-Simons theory, and the Gopakumar-Vafa duality for the resolved conifold; no free parameters are fitted. The monodromy defects and the Ωσ+ dictionary are constructed rather than postulated ad hoc.

axioms (4)
  • standard math Integrable representations of untwisted and twisted affine Lie algebras g_k and g^(2)_k, together with their modular S-matrices and fusion rules, are given by Kac's theory.
    Used throughout Sections 2 and 4 to label defects and compute correlators; standard textbook material.
  • domain assumption Chern-Simons theory with outer automorphism C admits a Z2-crossed braided extension whose twisted sector is realized by the monodromy defects constructed here.
    Assumed from the general theory of symmetry-enriched topological order (Barkeshli et al.); verified explicitly via the Hilbert spaces H_(1,C) etc.
  • domain assumption The large-N dual of SU(N)_k Chern-Simons on S^3 is the A-model on the resolved conifold (Gopakumar-Vafa), and orientifolds thereof are dual to Spin/Sp theories (Sinha-Vafa).
    Taken as established; the paper extends the dictionary rather than re-deriving it.
  • domain assumption The small-q expansion of analytically continued Chern-Simons amplitudes correctly captures the worldsheet instanton series of the dual topological string (including constant maps).
    Justified by matching known cases and by the DT/GW correspondence; used for all holographic identifications.
invented entities (2)
  • C-monodromy defects M_a independent evidence
    purpose: New codimension-two observables implementing charge-conjugation twists, labeled by integrable representations of the twisted affine algebra.
    Constructed geometrically (Seifert surface + twist) and algebraically (twisted characters); their existence is verified by the Hilbert-space analysis on decorated tori.
  • Ωσ+ orientifold dual of vacuum monodromy defects independent evidence
    purpose: Provides the closed-string background whose free energy matches the vacuum monodromy expectation value.
    Identified by matching free energies, crosscap signs, and fixed-locus geometry; previously lacked a gauge-theory dual.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 72651 in / 2941 out tokens · 43894 ms · 2026-07-10T23:43:48.085372+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Wilson loop operators in Chern-Simons theory have revealed profound links between quantum field theory, the fractional quantum Hall effect, topology, conformal field theory, and string theory. In Chern-Simons theories with charge conjugation symmetry, we construct a new class of observables: codimension-two monodromy defects around which fields return to themselves up to charge conjugation. Whereas Wilson loops are labeled by integrable representations of an untwisted affine Lie algebra, monodromy defects are labeled by those of the corresponding twisted affine algebra. The modular and fusion data of these two algebras determine the exact correlation functions of Wilson lines and monodromy defects, which together furnish a $\mathbb{Z}_2$-crossed braided tensor category. The spectrum of line defects in Chern-Simons theory thus gives a physical realization of every algebra in Kac's classification of affine Lie algebras: untwisted for Wilson loops, twisted for monodromy defects. We also determine the exact 't Hooft expansion of monodromy defects in $SU(N)_k$ Chern-Simons theory and identify their holographic duals in topological string theory. The insertion of the lightest monodromy defect has a striking effect: it replaces the resolved conifold background of the Gopakumar-Vafa duality by a specific orientifold of the resolved conifold, transmuting the dual theory of oriented strings into one of unoriented strings. Each excited monodromy defect is then realized as a collection of branes in the orientifold background, with the brane content determined by the representation of the twisted affine algebra that labels the defect.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.06669 by Federico Ambrosino, Jaume Gomis, Suriyah Rajalingam Kannagi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A g-monodromy defect Ma imposing g-twisted boundary conditions. z is a complex coordinate in the plane transverse to the codimension-two defect. The wavy line is a branch cut implementing the action of g. We show that Gk Chern–Simons theory with charge conjugation symmetry admits two distinct classes of line defects, Wilson lines and monodromy defects, labeled by: • WR : R is an integrable representation o… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Summary of the two orientifold projections on the deformed and resolved coni [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Monodromy defect supported on a knot that is the boundary of a topological [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The a- and b-cycles of T 2 . • Hilbert space H(1,1) . Recall the Hilbert space H(1,1) of Chern–Simons theory with gauge group G at level k on T 2 . Canonical quantization identifies this Hilbert space with the space of conformal blocks of the corresponding gk affine Lie algebra16 on T 2 [1, 9]. A basis of H(1,1) is labeled by the integrable highest weight representations of the affine algebra gk. These are… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Topological defect implementing the action of charge conjugation on a Wilson line. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: A stack of N Lagrangian branes wrapping S 3 is replaced, after geometric transition by an exceptional P 1 with K¨ahler parameter t = Ngs 3.1 String dual of partition function We begin our search for the bulk description of monodromy defects by recalling the essential ingredients underlying the string dual of the partition function of SU(N)k Chern–Simons theory on S 3 [12] and of its Wilson line observables… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Geometric transition for the Ωσ SO/Sp + orientifold. On the deformed conifold side, the orientifold plane O∓ intersects the stack of N Lagrangian branes along S 1 ⊂ S 3 . After the transition, the branes are replaced by flux, and the resolved conifold contains an orientifold plane O∓ at the fixed locus of σ+, shown as the dashed red line. holomorphic maps ϕ from oriented double covers obeying the equivaria… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Ωσ SO + ⊕ B orientifold of resolved conifold: there is a brane stuck at the midpoint of the internal edge, on top of the O-plane (red dashed line). 4.2.1 Constant maps We stress that the holographic dictionary the Chern–Simons observables and the topolog￾ical A-model, is an equality between the unormalized modular S-matrix elements and the topological string partition function. In particular, as we explain… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Open string partition function for a brane in the internal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p052_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Antibranes ending on the external edge at position [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p053_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Branes and their image in the double cover of the Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p054_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Branes ending on the internal edge at position [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p057_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Leading and subleading disk saddles for the fundamental Wilson line of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p067_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The basic brane, antibrane, and annulus contributions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p068_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Large N geometric transition from Spin (O− plane) and Sp (O+ plane) Chern– Simons theory to the orientifolded resolved geometry and with appropriate normalization factors ignored we have, 63 S00 .= Y 1≤i<j≤N [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p070_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: The M¨obius saddle for the fundamental Wilson line of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p074_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: The dual brane/antibrane configurations for the antisymmetric, symmetric trace [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p076_17.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 85 canonical work pages · 60 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial,

    E. Witten, “Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial,”Commun. Math. Phys.121 (1989) 351–399

    work page 1989

  2. [2]

    Invariants of 3-manifolds via link polynomials and quantum groups,

    N. Reshetikhin and V. G. Turaev, “Invariants of 3-manifolds via link polynomials and quantum groups,”Invent. Math.103(1991) 547–597

    work page 1991

  3. [3]

    Effective Field Theory Model for the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect,

    S. C. Zhang, T. H. Hansson, and S. Kivelson, “Effective Field Theory Model for the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect,”Phys. Rev. Lett.62(1989) 82–85

    work page 1989

  4. [4]

    Topological orders and Edge excitations in FQH states

    X.-G. Wen, “Topological orders and edge excitations in fractional quantum Hall states,” Adv. Phys.44(1995) 405–473,arXiv:cond-mat/9506066

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  5. [5]

    Direct observation of a fractional charge,

    R. de Picciotto, M. Reznikov, M. Heiblum, V. Umansky, G. Bunin, and D. Mahalu, “Direct observation of a fractional charge,”Nature389(1997) 162–164

    work page 1997

  6. [6]

    Fractional statistics in anyon collisions,

    H. Bartolomei, M. Kumar, R. Bisognin, A. Marguerite, J.-M. Berroir, E. Bocquillon, B. Pla¸ cais, A. Cavanna, Q. Dong, U. Gennser, Y. Jin, and G. F` eve, “Fractional statistics in anyon collisions,”Science368(2020) 173–177

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    A polynomial invariant for knots via von Neumann algebras,

    V. F. R. Jones, “A polynomial invariant for knots via von Neumann algebras,”Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.12(1985) 103–111

    work page 1985

  8. [8]

    V. G. Turaev,Quantum Invariants of Knots and 3-Manifolds, vol. 18 ofde Gruyter Studies in Mathematics. de Gruyter, Berlin, 1994

    work page 1994

  9. [9]

    Remarks on the Canonical Quantization of the Chern-Simons-Witten Theory,

    S. Elitzur, G. W. Moore, A. Schwimmer, and N. Seiberg, “Remarks on the Canonical Quantization of the Chern-Simons-Witten Theory,”Nucl. Phys. B326(1989) 108–134

    work page 1989

  10. [10]

    Classical and Quantum Conformal Field Theory,

    G. W. Moore and N. Seiberg, “Classical and Quantum Conformal Field Theory,”Commun. Math. Phys.123(1989) 177–254

    work page 1989

  11. [11]

    A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions,

    G. ’t Hooft, “A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions,”Nucl. Phys. B72(1974) 461–473

    work page 1974

  12. [12]

    On the Gauge Theory/Geometry Correspondence

    R. Gopakumar and C. Vafa, “On the gauge theory / geometry correspondence,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.3(1999) 1415–1443,arXiv:hep-th/9811131

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  13. [13]

    Knot Invariants and Topological Strings

    H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, “Knot invariants and topological strings,”Nucl. Phys. B577(2000) 419–438,arXiv:hep-th/9912123

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  14. [14]

    The AdS/$\mathsf{C}$-$\mathsf{P}$-${\mathsf T}$ Correspondence

    J. Gomis, “The AdS/C-P-Tcorrespondence,”arXiv:2507.12467 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    Homotopy field theory in dimension 3 and crossed group-categories

    V. Turaev, “Homotopy field theory in dimension 3 and crossed group-categories,” arXiv:math/0005291 [math.GT]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    On $G$--equivariant modular categories

    A. J. Kirillov, “OnG-equivariant modular categories,”arXiv:math/0401119 [math.QA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    Conformal Orbifold Theories and Braided Crossed G-Categories

    M. M¨ uger, “Conformal orbifold theories and braided crossedG-categories,”Communications in Mathematical Physics260no. 3, (2005) 727–762,arXiv:math/0403322 [math.QA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  18. [18]

    Symmetry Fractionalization, Defects, and Gauging of Topological Phases

    M. Barkeshli, P. Bonderson, M. Cheng, and Z. Wang, “Symmetry fractionalization, defects, and gauging of topological phases,”Physical Review B100no. 11, (2019) 115147, arXiv:1410.4540 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  19. [19]

    V. G. Kac,Infinite-Dimensional Lie Algebras. Cambridge University Press, 3 ed., 1990. 100

    work page 1990

  20. [20]

    Wilson Loops, Geometric Transitions and Bubbling Calabi-Yau's

    J. Gomis and T. Okuda, “Wilson loops, geometric transitions and bubbling Calabi-Yau’s,” JHEP02(2007) 083,arXiv:hep-th/0612190

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  21. [21]

    Chern-Simons Gauge Theory As A String Theory

    E. Witten, “Chern-Simons gauge theory as a string theory,”Prog. Math.133(1995) 637–678,arXiv:hep-th/9207094

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  22. [22]

    Borel and Stokes Nonperturbative Phenomena in Topological String Theory and c=1 Matrix Models

    S. Pasquetti and R. Schiappa, “Borel and Stokes Nonperturbative Phenomena in Topological String Theory and c=1 Matrix Models,”Annales Henri Poincare11(2010) 351–431, arXiv:0907.4082 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  23. [23]

    Non-perturbative effects and the refined topological string

    Y. Hatsuda, M. Marino, S. Moriyama, and K. Okuyama, “Non-perturbative effects and the refined topological string,”JHEP09(2014) 168,arXiv:1306.1734 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  24. [24]

    Resurgence of Refined Topological Strings and Dual Partition Functions

    S. Alexandrov, M. Mari˜ no, and B. Pioline, “Resurgence of Refined Topological Strings and Dual Partition Functions,”SIGMA20(2024) 073,arXiv:2311.17638 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Mathematical structures of non-perturbative topological string theory: from GW to DT invariants

    M. Alim, A. Saha, J. Teschner, and I. Tulli, “Mathematical Structures of Non-perturbative Topological String Theory: From GW to DT Invariants,”Commun. Math. Phys.399no. 2, (2023) 1039–1101,arXiv:2109.06878 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Orientifolds, Mirror Symmetry and Superpotentials

    B. S. Acharya, M. Aganagic, K. Hori, and C. Vafa, “Orientifolds, mirror symmetry and superpotentials,”arXiv:hep-th/0202208

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    Non-perturbative orientifold transitions at the conifold

    K. Hori, K. Hosomichi, D. C. Page, R. Rabadan, and J. Walcher, “Non-perturbative orientifold transitions at the conifold,”JHEP10(2005) 026,arXiv:hep-th/0506234

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  28. [29]

    SO and Sp Chern-Simons at Large N

    S. Sinha and C. Vafa, “SO and Sp Chern-Simons at Large N,”arXiv:hep-th/0012136

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [30]

    Baryons And Branes In Anti de Sitter Space

    E. Witten, “Baryons and branes in anti-de Sitter space,”JHEP07(1998) 006, arXiv:hep-th/9805112

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  30. [31]

    Lectures on RCFT,

    G. W. Moore and N. Seiberg, “Lectures on RCFT,” inSuperstrings ’89, pp. 1–129. World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, 1990. Proceedings of the Trieste Spring School, Trieste, 1989

    work page 1990

  31. [32]

    D-branes and the planar limit of Chern-Simons theory. Link invariants,

    D. Gaiotto, S. R. Kannagi, and S. Sanjurjo, “D-branes and the planar limit of Chern-Simons theory. Link invariants,”JHEP03(2026) 194,arXiv:2506.03246 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  32. [33]

    D-branes as a Bubbling Calabi-Yau

    J. Gomis and T. Okuda, “D-branes as a Bubbling Calabi-Yau,”JHEP07(2007) 005, arXiv:0704.3080 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  33. [34]

    Generalized Global Symmetries

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, “Generalized Global Symmetries,” JHEP02(2015) 172,arXiv:1412.5148 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  34. [35]

    Determination of an operator algebra for the two-dimensional ising model,

    L. P. Kadanoff and H. Ceva, “Determination of an operator algebra for the two-dimensional ising model,”Physical Review B3no. 11, (1971) 3918–3939

    work page 1971

  35. [36]

    Scaling of disorder operator at $(2+1)d$ U(1) quantum criticality

    Y.-C. Wang, M. Cheng, and Z. Y. Meng, “Scaling of the disorder operator at (2 + 1)d U(1) quantum criticality,”Physical Review B104no. 8, (2021) L081109,arXiv:2101.10358 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  36. [37]

    Strings on Orbifolds,

    L. J. Dixon, J. A. Harvey, C. Vafa, and E. Witten, “Strings on Orbifolds,”Nucl. Phys. B 261(1985) 678–686. 101

    work page 1985

  37. [38]

    The Conformal Field Theory of Orbifolds,

    L. J. Dixon, D. Friedan, E. J. Martinec, and S. H. Shenker, “The Conformal Field Theory of Orbifolds,”Nucl. Phys. B282(1987) 13–73

    work page 1987

  38. [39]

    Line defects in the 3d Ising model

    M. Bill´ o, M. Caselle, D. Gaiotto, F. Gliozzi, M. Meineri, and R. Pellegrini, “Line defects in the 3d Ising model,”JHEP07(2013) 055,arXiv:1304.4110 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  39. [40]

    Line and surface defects for the free scalar field

    E. Lauria, P. Liendo, B. C. Van Rees, and X. Zhao, “Line and surface defects for the free scalar field,”JHEP01(2021) 060,arXiv:2005.02413 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  40. [41]

    Monodromy Defects from Hyperbolic Space

    S. Giombi, E. Helfenberger, Z. Ji, and H. Khanchandani, “Monodromy defects from hyperbolic space,”JHEP02(2022) 041,arXiv:2102.11815 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  41. [42]

    Monodromy Defects in Free Field Theories

    L. Bianchi, A. Chalabi, V. Proch´ azka, B. Robinson, and J. Sisti, “Monodromy defects in free field theories,”JHEP08(2021) 013,arXiv:2104.01220 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  42. [43]

    Exploring Defects with Degrees of Freedom in Free Scalar CFTs

    V. Bashmakov and J. Sisti, “Exploring defects with degrees of freedom in free scalar CFTs,” JHEP03(2025) 147,arXiv:2410.01716 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  43. [44]

    Topological Disorder Parameter

    B.-B. Chen, H.-H. Tu, Z. Y. Meng, and M. Cheng, “Topological disorder parameter: A many-body invariant to characterize gapped quantum phases,”Phys. Rev. B106no. 9, (2022) 094415,arXiv:2203.08847 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  44. [45]

    Fusion categories and homotopy theory

    P. Etingof, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik, “Fusion categories and homotopy theory,”Quantum Topology1no. 3, (2010) 209–273,arXiv:0909.3140 [math.QA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  45. [46]

    Auto-equivalences of the modular tensor categories of type A, B, C and G,

    C. Edie-Michell, “Auto-equivalences of the modular tensor categories of type A, B, C and G,”Adv. Math.402(2022) 108364

    work page 2022

  46. [47]

    Symmetries of Abelian Chern-Simons Theories and Arithmetic

    D. Delmastro and J. Gomis, “Symmetries of Abelian Chern-Simons Theories and Arithmetic,”JHEP03(2021) 006,arXiv:1904.12884 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  47. [48]

    From Dynkin diagram symmetries to fixed point structures

    J. Fuchs, B. Schellekens, and C. Schweigert, “From dynkin diagram symmetries to fixed point structures,”Communications in Mathematical Physics180(1996) 39–98, arXiv:hep-th/9506135

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  48. [49]

    On Gauging Symmetry of Modular Categories

    S. X. Cui, C. Galindo, J. Y. Plavnik, and Z. Wang, “On gauging symmetry of modular categories,”Communications in Mathematical Physics348no. 3, (2016) 1043–1064, arXiv:1510.03475 [math.QA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  49. [50]

    Fusion rules and modular transformations in 2d conformal field theory,

    E. P. Verlinde, “Fusion rules and modular transformations in 2d conformal field theory,” Nucl. Phys. B300(1988) 360–376

    work page 1988

  50. [51]

    Symmetry breaking boundary conditions and WZW orbifolds

    L. Birke, J. Fuchs, and C. Schweigert, “Symmetry breaking boundary conditions and WZW orbifolds,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.3(1999) 671–726,arXiv:hep-th/9905038. Conjectured the twisted Verlinde formula forZ 2 WZW orbifolds

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  51. [52]

    Crossed modular categories and the Verlinde formula for twisted conformal blocks

    T. Deshpande and S. Mukhopadhyay, “Crossed modular categories and the Verlinde formula for twisted conformal blocks,”arXiv:1909.10799 [math.QA]. Categorical proof via Γ-crossed modular fusion categories; Thms. 1.2–1.3

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1909

  52. [53]

    Twisted Verlinde formula for vertex operator algebras

    C. Dong and X. Lin, “Twisted Verlinde formula for vertex operator algebras,” arXiv:2310.15563 [math.QA]. VOA proof for prime-order automorphisms; twisted Kac–Walton formula; Thm. 5.1

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [54]

    Topological Sigma Models,

    E. Witten, “Topological Sigma Models,”Commun. Math. Phys.118(1988) 411. 102

    work page 1988

  54. [55]

    Mirror Manifolds And Topological Field Theory

    E. Witten, “Mirror Manifolds And Topological Field Theory,”arXiv:hep-th/9112056

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [56]

    The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252,arXiv:hep-th/9711200

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  56. [57]

    Knots, links and branes at large N

    J. M. F. Labastida, M. Mari˜ no, and C. Vafa, “Knots, links and branes at large N,”JHEP11 (2000) 007,arXiv:hep-th/0010102

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  57. [58]

    Mirror Symmetry, D-Branes and Counting Holomorphic Discs

    M. Aganagic and C. Vafa, “Mirror symmetry, D-branes and counting holomorphic discs,” arXiv:hep-th/0012041 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [59]

    Disk Instantons, Mirror Symmetry and the Duality Web

    M. Aganagic, A. Klemm, and C. Vafa, “Disk instantons, mirror symmetry and the duality web,”Z. Naturforsch. A57(2002) 1–28,arXiv:hep-th/0105045 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  59. [60]

    Framed knots at large N

    M. Mari˜ no and C. Vafa, “Framed knots at large N,”Contemp. Math.310(2002) 185–204, arXiv:hep-th/0108064

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  60. [61]

    Geometric Transitions and Open String Instantons

    D.-E. Diaconescu, B. Florea, and A. Grassi, “Geometric transitions and open string instantons,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.6(2003) 619–642,arXiv:hep-th/0205234

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  61. [62]

    Large N duality, lagrangian cycles, and algebraic knots

    D.-E. Diaconescu, V. Shende, and C. Vafa, “Large N duality, Lagrangian cycles, and algebraic knots,”Commun. Math. Phys.319(2013) 813–863,arXiv:1111.6533 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  62. [63]

    Marino,Chern-Simons theory, matrix models, and topological strings

    M. Marino,Chern-Simons theory, matrix models, and topological strings. Oxford University Press, 2005

    work page 2005

  63. [64]

    Chern-Simons Theory, Holography and Topological Strings,

    C. Vafa, “Chern-Simons Theory, Holography and Topological Strings,” 5, 2025

    work page 2025

  64. [65]

    M-Theory and Topological Strings--I

    R. Gopakumar and C. Vafa, “M-Theory and Topological Strings–I,”arXiv:hep-th/9809187

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  65. [66]

    M-Theory and Topological Strings--II

    R. Gopakumar and C. Vafa, “M-Theory and Topological Strings–II,” arXiv:hep-th/9812127

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [67]

    Quantum Foam and Topological Strings

    A. Iqbal, N. Nekrasov, A. Okounkov, and C. Vafa, “Quantum foam and topological strings,” JHEP04(2008) 011,arXiv:hep-th/0312022

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  67. [68]

    Gromov-Witten theory and Donaldson-Thomas theory, I

    D. Maulik, N. Nekrasov, A. Okounkov, and R. Pandharipande, “Gromov–Witten theory and Donaldson–Thomas theory, I,”Compos. Math.142no. 05, (2006) 1263–1285, arXiv:math/0312059

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  68. [69]

    S-duality and Topological Strings

    N. Nekrasov, H. Ooguri, and C. Vafa, “S duality and topological strings,”JHEP10(2004) 009,arXiv:hep-th/0403167

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  69. [70]

    Wilson Loops of Anti-symmetric Representation and D5-branes

    S. Yamaguchi, “Wilson loops of anti-symmetric representation and D5-branes,”JHEP05 (2006) 037,arXiv:hep-th/0603208

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  70. [71]

    Wilson Loops as D3-Branes

    J. Gomis and F. Passerini, “Wilson Loops as D3-Branes,”JHEP01(2007) 097, arXiv:hep-th/0612022

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  71. [72]

    All-genus calculation of Wilson loops using D-branes

    N. Drukker and B. Fiol, “All-genus calculation of Wilson loops using D-branes,”JHEP02 (2005) 010,arXiv:hep-th/0501109

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  72. [73]

    The Topological Vertex

    M. Aganagic, A. Klemm, M. Marino, and C. Vafa, “The Topological vertex,”Commun. Math. Phys.254(2005) 425–478,arXiv:hep-th/0305132

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  73. [74]

    Boundary states for wzw models,

    M. R. Gaberdiel and T. Gannon, “Boundary states for wzw models,”Nuclear Physics B639 no. 3, (Sept., 2002) 471–501.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00559-X. 103

    work page doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(02)00559-x 2002

  74. [77]

    Evidence for Tadpole Cancellation in the Topological String

    J. Walcher, “Evidence for tadpole cancellation in the topological string,”Communications in Number Theory and Physics3no. 1, (2009) 111–172,arXiv:0712.2775 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  75. [78]

    Real Mirror Symmetry for One-parameter Hypersurfaces

    D. Krefl and J. Walcher, “Real mirror symmetry for one-parameter hypersurfaces,”Journal of High Energy Physics09(2008) 031,arXiv:0805.0792 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  76. [79]

    The Real Topological String on a local Calabi-Yau

    D. Krefl and J. Walcher, “The real topological string on a local Calabi-Yau,” arXiv:0902.0616 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  77. [81]

    Orientifolds and the Refined Topological String

    M. Aganagic and K. Schaeffer, “Orientifolds and the refined topological string,”Journal of High Energy Physics09(2012) 084,arXiv:1202.4456 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  78. [82]

    Notes on stable maps and quantum cohomology

    W. Fulton and R. Pandharipande, “Notes on stable maps and quantum cohomology,” 1997. https://arxiv.org/abs/alg-geom/9608011

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  79. [83]

    Counting Higher Genus Curves with Crosscaps in Calabi-Yau Orientifolds

    V. Bouchard, B. Florea, and M. Mari˜ no, “Counting higher genus curves with crosscaps in Calabi-Yau orientifolds,”arXiv:hep-th/0405083 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  80. [84]

    Topological Open String Amplitudes On Orientifolds

    V. Bouchard, B. Florea, and M. Marino, “Topological open string amplitudes on orientifolds,”JHEP02(2005) 002,arXiv:hep-th/0411227

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

Showing first 80 references.