arxiv: 2604.08449 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-09 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

Coupled Dark Energy and Dark Matter for DESI: An Effective Guide to the Phantom Divide

Stefan Antusch , Stephen F. King , Xin Wang

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO hep-ph

keywords coupled dark energydark matter interactionsphantom divideDESIquintessenceeffective equation of statedynamical dark energy

0 comments

The pith

A field-dependent coupling between quintessence and dark matter allows the effective equation of state to cross the phantom divide without the scalar field itself becoming phantom.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper explores how interacting dark energy models can explain recent DESI observations suggesting dynamical dark energy that appears to cross into phantom territory. The key idea is that when a quintessence scalar field couples to cold dark matter with a mass that depends on the field value, the inferred effective dark energy equation of state w_eff differs from the actual scalar field equation of state w_φ. This difference permits an apparent w_eff < -1 even though the true w_φ stays above -1. For the model to work with both CMB and DESI data, the scalar must start frozen deep in the radiation-dominated era so the coupling stays weak early on but strengthens later. The authors outline the general conditions for this and give a specific example that matches the DESI-preferred evolution.

Core claim

In interacting dark energy scenarios with a field-dependent mass m(φ) for cold dark matter, the effective equation of state w_eff(z) inferred from observations assuming no interaction can cross below -1, while the intrinsic w_φ(z) does not, provided the scalar field freezes early enough in the radiation era to keep the coupling suppressed before recombination.

What carries the argument

The field-dependent mass coupling m(φ) between the quintessence scalar and cold dark matter, which induces energy transfer that decouples the observed w_eff from the true w_φ.

If this is right

Models satisfying the early freezing condition can reproduce w_eff(z) evolving from approximately -1.2 at z=1 to -0.9 at z=0.4.
The effective coupling remains weak enough before recombination to satisfy CMB constraints.
Such models provide a way to fit DESI DR2 data without introducing phantom scalar fields.
General conditions are identified that allow the suppression early and strengthening late to occur simultaneously.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Future high-precision measurements of the expansion history could distinguish this effective crossing from true phantom behavior by looking for signatures in structure growth.
This mechanism suggests that microphysical models of the scalar field must incorporate a specific form of mass dependence on φ to achieve the required evolution.
Extensions to include baryonic interactions or other sectors might be needed to fully test consistency with all cosmological probes.

Load-bearing premise

A suitable field-dependent mass function m(φ) exists that keeps the coupling suppressed before recombination but allows it to grow strong enough at low redshift to produce the DESI-preferred w_eff(z) while fitting all other data.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that the dark matter density or clustering evolves exactly as in non-interacting models at late times, or tighter early-universe constraints that forbid the required frozen phase.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.08449 by Stefan Antusch, Stephen F. King, Xin Wang.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2: The evolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3: The evolution of energy fractions of radiation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5: The evolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Motivated by the recent Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) DR2 preference for dynamical dark energy, we study interacting dark energy models in which a canonical quintessence field couples to cold dark matter through a field-dependent mass $m(\phi)$. In such scenarios, the effective equation of state inferred under the assumption of non-interacting dark sectors, $w_{\rm eff}(z)$, can differ from the intrinsic scalar-field equation of state $w_\phi(z)$, making an apparent phantom crossing $w_{\rm eff}<-1$ possible without introducing a phantom scalar. We show that a viable realization of this mechanism requires the scalar field to originate from a frozen phase deep in the radiation era, in order for the effective coupling to remain sufficiently suppressed before recombination to evade cosmic microwave background constraints, and for the late-time evolution to become strong enough to reproduce the apparent behavior of $w_{\rm eff}(z)$ preferred by DESI. We identify the general conditions that allow these requirements to be satisfied simultaneously, and present an illustrative phenomenological realization in which $w_{\rm eff}(z)$ evolves from $w_{\rm eff}\approx -1.2$ at $z \approx 1.0$ to $w_{\rm eff}\approx -0.9$ at $z\approx 0.4$. These conditions and requirements serve as a guide for designing future models of this kind which can safely navigate the phantom divide at $w=-1$ in an effective way without phantom fields.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper spells out workable conditions for a field-dependent coupling to make effective w cross below -1 for DESI without phantom scalars, but the example is built to fit rather than derived from fundamentals.

read the letter

The central result here is that a canonical quintessence field coupled to dark matter through m(φ) can produce an inferred w_eff(z) that dips below -1 at moderate redshifts while the actual scalar equation of state stays above -1. The authors show this requires the field to begin frozen deep in the radiation era so the coupling stays weak through recombination, then strengthens at late times. They extract the general conditions on initial values and on the shape of m(φ) that let both requirements hold at once, and they give one explicit phenomenological function that tracks w_eff from roughly -1.2 at z=1 down to -0.9 at z=0.4, matching the DESI DR2 preference they cite.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies coupled quintessence-dark matter models with a field-dependent mass m(φ) for the cold dark matter. It shows that the effective equation of state w_eff(z) inferred from observations under the assumption of non-interacting sectors can cross the phantom divide (w_eff < -1) even though the intrinsic scalar equation of state w_φ does not. The authors derive general conditions requiring the scalar to begin in a frozen phase deep in the radiation era, which keeps the effective coupling suppressed through recombination (to satisfy CMB bounds) while permitting sufficient late-time growth to reproduce DESI-preferred w_eff(z) behavior. An illustrative phenomenological realization is constructed that produces w_eff evolving from ≈−1.2 at z≈1.0 to ≈−0.9 at z≈0.4.

Significance. If the identified conditions on initial conditions and m(φ) can be realized without additional inconsistencies, the work supplies a concrete mechanism for interpreting apparent phantom crossing in DESI data using only canonical quintessence, thereby avoiding the theoretical difficulties of phantom fields. The explicit general conditions and the by-design illustrative example constitute useful guidance for constructing viable interacting dark-energy models that remain consistent with early-universe constraints.

major comments (2)

[§3] §3 (General conditions): The requirement that the scalar originates from a frozen phase deep in the radiation era is central to suppressing the coupling before recombination, but the manuscript does not explicitly verify that the resulting perturbation equations remain stable against early dark-energy contributions or isocurvature modes that could affect CMB constraints.
[§4] §4 (Illustrative realization): The chosen m(φ) and initial conditions are constructed to satisfy the target w_eff(z) trajectory by design; without a sensitivity study or demonstration that nearby parameter choices still evade CMB bounds while matching the quoted w_eff values, the claim that these conditions are broadly viable remains provisional.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract and §4] The abstract and §4 quote specific w_eff values at z≈1.0 and z≈0.4; these should be accompanied by a direct overlay or quantitative comparison against the actual DESI DR2 posterior on w_eff(z) to clarify how well the example reproduces the data preference.
[Throughout] Notation for the effective coupling strength and the field-dependent mass should be defined once in a dedicated subsection and used consistently; occasional redefinitions in the text reduce readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading, positive summary, and recommendation for minor revision. The comments on perturbation stability and the robustness of the illustrative example are well taken. We address each point below and have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3] §3 (General conditions): The requirement that the scalar originates from a frozen phase deep in the radiation era is central to suppressing the coupling before recombination, but the manuscript does not explicitly verify that the resulting perturbation equations remain stable against early dark-energy contributions or isocurvature modes that could affect CMB constraints.

Authors: We agree that an explicit discussion of perturbation stability strengthens the presentation. The general conditions derived in §3 ensure the scalar remains frozen with Ω_φ ≪ 1 throughout the radiation era and recombination, rendering any early dark-energy contribution negligible and the effective coupling suppressed to levels consistent with standard cosmology. In the revised manuscript we have added a paragraph to §3 that explicitly maps the perturbation equations onto the uncoupled case at early times, showing that isocurvature modes are not sourced at a level that would violate CMB constraints. A full numerical Boltzmann-code scan of all modes lies beyond the scope of the present work but is noted as a natural extension. revision: partial
Referee: [§4] §4 (Illustrative realization): The chosen m(φ) and initial conditions are constructed to satisfy the target w_eff(z) trajectory by design; without a sensitivity study or demonstration that nearby parameter choices still evade CMB bounds while matching the quoted w_eff values, the claim that these conditions are broadly viable remains provisional.

Authors: The example in §4 is deliberately constructed to realize the general conditions of §3. To address the concern about provisionality, the revised manuscript now includes a short sensitivity study in §4. We vary the slope parameters of m(φ) and the initial field value within ±10 % of the fiducial choice and verify that (i) the early-time coupling remains sufficiently suppressed to satisfy CMB bounds and (ii) the late-time w_eff(z) trajectory stays within the quoted range. The results confirm that the mechanism is robust for nearby parameter choices, thereby supporting the broader viability of the identified conditions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper derives general conditions on scalar initial conditions (frozen deep in radiation era) and the functional form of the field-dependent mass m(φ) that simultaneously suppress the effective coupling before recombination while permitting sufficient late-time growth. It then constructs an explicit illustrative phenomenological realization that satisfies these conditions by design and exhibits the target w_eff(z) trajectory. This constitutes a transparent demonstration of viability rather than a first-principles derivation or statistical prediction; the shown evolution is not claimed to be independently predicted but is engineered to match the stated requirements. No load-bearing self-citations, hidden fits presented as predictions, or self-definitional loops are present. The central result functions as a guide for future model construction and remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; cannot enumerate free parameters, axioms or invented entities with precision. The model relies on an unspecified field-dependent mass function m(φ) whose form is chosen to satisfy early- and late-time requirements.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5578 in / 1212 out tokens · 31182 ms · 2026-05-10T17:08:57.890109+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

No evidence for phantom crossing: local goodness-of-fit improvements do not persist under global Bayesian model comparison
astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

Local goodness-of-fit gains for w0wa and phantom crossing vanish under global Bayesian evidence, showing no statistically robust evidence for dynamical dark energy across datasets.
Breaking Free from the Swampland of Impossible Universes through the DESI Portal
astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

DESI data indicating evolving dark energy may allow string theory to describe observed universes without violating swampland constraints on constant dark energy.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 10 internal anchors

[1]

The cosmological constant and cold dark matter,

G. Efstathiou, W. J. Sutherland, and S. J. Maddox, “The cosmological constant and cold dark matter,” Na- ture348, 705–707 (1990)

1990
[2]

Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe

Joshua Frieman, Michael Turner, and Dragan Huterer, “Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe,” Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.46, 385–432 (2008), arXiv:0803.0982 [astro-ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 2008
[3]

Observational Probes of Cosmic Acceleration

David H. Weinberg, Michael J. Mortonson, Daniel J. Eisenstein, Christopher Hirata, Adam G. Riess, and Ed- uardo Rozo, “Observational Probes of Cosmic Accelera- 12 tion,” Phys. Rept.530, 87–255 (2013), arXiv:1201.2434 [astro-ph.CO]

work page Pith review arXiv 2013
[4]

Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant

Adam G. Riesset al.(Supernova Search Team), “Ob- servational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant,” Astron. J.116, 1009–1038 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9805201

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1998
[5]

Perlmutter and others (Supernova Cosmology Project), Astrophys

S. Perlmutteret al.(Supernova Cosmology Project), “Measurements ofΩandΛfrom 42 High Redshift Super- novae,” Astrophys. J.517, 565–586 (1999), arXiv:astro- ph/9812133

work page arXiv 1999
[6]

Parameter constraints for flat cosmologies from CMB and 2dFGRS power spectra

Will J. Percivalet al.(2dFGRS Team), “Parameter con- straints for flat cosmologies from CMB and 2dFGRS power spectra,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.337, 1068 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0206256

work page Pith review arXiv 2002
[7]

Cole , W

Shaun Coleet al.(2dFGRS), “The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: Power-spectrum analysis of the final dataset and cosmological implications,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 362, 505–534 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0501174

work page arXiv 2005
[8]

Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,” Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[9]

The completed SDSS-IV ex- tended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmo- logical implications from multitracer BAO analysis with galaxies and voids,

Cheng Zhaoet al.(eBOSS), “The completed SDSS-IV ex- tended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmo- logical implications from multitracer BAO analysis with galaxies and voids,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.511, 5492–5524 (2022), arXiv:2110.03824 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2022
[10]

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing

T. M. C. Abbottet al.(DES), “Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy cluster- ing and weak lensing,” Phys. Rev. D98, 043526 (2018), arXiv:1708.01530 [astro-ph.CO]

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[11]

Alam and others (eBOSS), Phys

Shadab Alamet al.(eBOSS), “Completed SDSS-IV ex- tended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cos- mological implications from two decades of spectroscopic surveys at the Apache Point Observatory,” Phys. Rev. D 103, 083533 (2021), arXiv:2007.08991 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2021
[12]

, keywords =

Catherine Heymanset al., “KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Multi-probe weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering constraints,” Astron. Astrophys.646, A140 (2021), arXiv:2007.15632 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2021
[13]

The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints

Dillon Broutet al., “The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cos- mological Constraints,” Astrophys. J.938, 110 (2022), arXiv:2202.04077 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022
[14]

The Dark Energy Sur- vey: Cosmology Results with ∼1500 New High-redshift Type Ia Supernovae Using the Full 5 yr Data Set,

T. M. C. Abbottet al.(DES), “The Dark Energy Sur- vey: Cosmology Results with∼1500 New High-redshift Type Ia Supernovae Using the Full 5 yr Data Set,” Astro- phys. J. Lett.973, L14 (2024), arXiv:2401.02929 [astro- ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2024
[15]

Cosmology Intertwined: A Review of the Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Associated with the Cosmological Tensions and Anomalies

Elcio Abdallaet al., “Cosmology intertwined: A re- view of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anoma- lies,” JHEAp34, 49–211 (2022), arXiv:2203.06142 [astro- ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022
[16]

Perivolaropoulos and F

Leandros Perivolaropoulos and Foteini Skara, “Chal- lenges forΛCDM: An update,” New Astron. Rev.95, 101659 (2022), arXiv:2105.05208 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2022
[17]

DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations

A. G. Adameet al.(DESI), “DESI 2024 VI: cosmologi- cal constraints from the measurements of baryon acous- tic oscillations,” JCAP02, 021 (2025), arXiv:2404.03002 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024
[18]

Extended Dark Energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements

K. Lodhaet al.(DESI), “Extended dark energy analy- sis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements,” Phys. Rev. D 112, 083511 (2025), arXiv:2503.14743 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[19]

DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints

M. Abdul Karimet al.(DESI), “DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmo- logical constraints,” Phys. Rev. D112, 083515 (2025), arXiv:2503.14738 [astro-ph.CO]

work page Pith review arXiv 2025
[20]

Andrade, E

U. Andradeet al.(DESI), “Validation of the DESI DR2 measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations from galax- ies and quasars,” Phys. Rev. D112, 083512 (2025), arXiv:2503.14742 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[21]

Elbers et al

W. Elberset al., “Constraints on neutrino physics from DESI DR2 BAO and DR1 full shape,” Phys. Rev. D112, 083513 (2025), arXiv:2503.14744 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[22]

Is local H 0 at odds with dark energy EFT?

Bum-Hoon Lee, Wonwoo Lee, Eoin Ó. Colgáin, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, and Somyadip Thakur, “Is local H 0 at odds with dark energy EFT?” JCAP04, 004 (2022), arXiv:2202.03906 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2022
[23]

How much has DESI dark en- ergy evolved since DR1?

Eoin Ó. Colgáin, Saeed Pourojaghi, M. M. Sheikh- Jabbari, and Lu Yin, “How much has DESI dark energy evolved since DR1?” Phys. Dark Univ.52, 102268 (2026), arXiv:2504.04417 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2026
[24]

TheCosmonmodelforanasymptot- ically vanishing time dependent cosmological ’constant’,

ChristofWetterich,“TheCosmonmodelforanasymptot- ically vanishing time dependent cosmological ’constant’,” Astron. Astrophys.301, 321–328 (1995), arXiv:hep- th/9408025

work page arXiv 1995
[25]

Cosmological Con- sequences of a Rolling Homogeneous Scalar Field,

Bharat Ratra and P. J. E. Peebles, “Cosmological Con- sequences of a Rolling Homogeneous Scalar Field,” Phys. Rev. D37, 3406 (1988)

1988
[26]

The Case for a Positive Cosmological Lambda-term

Varun Sahni and Alexei A. Starobinsky, “The Case for a positive cosmological Lambda term,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D9, 373–444 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9904398

work page Pith review arXiv 2000
[27]

The Cosmological Constant and Dark Energy

P. J. E. Peebles and Bharat Ratra, “The Cosmological Constant and Dark Energy,” Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 559– 606 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0207347

work page Pith review arXiv 2003
[28]

Interacting Phantom Energy

Zong-Kuan Guo and Yuan-Zhong Zhang, “Interacting phantom energy,” Phys. Rev. D71, 023501 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0411524

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2005
[29]

Coupled Quintessence

Luca Amendola, “Coupled quintessence,” Phys. Rev. D 62, 043511 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9908023

work page Pith review arXiv 2000
[30]

Interacting dark matter and dark energy,

Glennys R. Farrar and P. James E. Peebles, “Interacting dark matter and dark energy,” Astrophys. J.604, 1–11 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0307316

work page arXiv 2004
[31]

Chameleon cos- mology,

Justin Khoury and Amanda Weltman, “Chameleon cos- mology,” Phys. Rev. D69, 044026 (2004), arXiv:astro- ph/0309411

work page arXiv 2004
[32]

Super-acceleration as Signature of Dark Sector Interaction

Subinoy Das, Pier Stefano Corasaniti, and Justin Khoury, “Super-acceleration as signature of dark sec- tor interaction,” Phys. Rev. D73, 083509 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0510628

work page Pith review arXiv 2006
[33]

Phe- nomenology of Hybrid Scenarios of Neutrino Dark En- ergy,

Stefan Antusch, Subinoy Das, and Koushik Dutta, “Phe- nomenology of Hybrid Scenarios of Neutrino Dark En- ergy,” JCAP10, 016 (2008), arXiv:0807.4930 [astro-ph]

work page arXiv 2008
[34]

Cai, Z.-K

Rong-Gen Cai, Zong-Kuan Guo, Li Li, Shao-Jiang Wang, and Wang-Wei Yu, “Chameleon dark energy can resolve the Hubble tension,” Phys. Rev. D103, 121302 (2021), arXiv:2102.02020 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2021
[35]

Dynamics of dark energy

Edmund J. Copeland, M. Sami, and Shinji Tsujikawa, “Dynamics of dark energy,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D15, 1753–1936 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0603057

work page Pith review arXiv 1936
[36]

Probing the Coupling between Dark Components of the Universe,

Zong-Kuan Guo, Nobuyoshi Ohta, and Shinji Tsujikawa, “Probing the Coupling between Dark Components of the Universe,” Phys. Rev. D76, 023508 (2007), arXiv:astro- ph/0702015

work page arXiv 2007
[37]

On the Dark Sec- tor Interactions,

Rong-Gen Cai and Qiping Su, “On the Dark Sec- tor Interactions,” Phys. Rev. D81, 103514 (2010), arXiv:0912.1943 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2010
[38]

Beyond $\Lambda$CDM: Problems, solutions, and the road ahead

Philip Bullet al., “BeyondΛCDM: Problems, solutions, 13 and the road ahead,” Phys. Dark Univ.12, 56–99 (2016), arXiv:1512.05356 [astro-ph.CO]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[39]

Quintessence, Cosmic Coincidence, and the Cosmological Constant

Ivaylo Zlatev, Li-Min Wang, and Paul J. Steinhardt, “Quintessence, cosmic coincidence, and the cosmolog- ical constant,” Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 896–899 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9807002

work page Pith review arXiv 1999
[40]

The Limits of Quintessence

R. R. Caldwell and Eric V. Linder, “The Limits of quintessence,” Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 141301 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0505494

work page Pith review arXiv 2005
[41]

A Phantom Menace? Cosmological consequences of a dark energy component with super-negative equation of state

R.R.Caldwell,“APhantommenace?” Phys.Lett.B545, 23–29 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/9908168

work page Pith review arXiv 2002
[42]

The phantom menaced: constraints on low-energy effective ghosts

James M. Cline, Sangyong Jeon, and Guy D. Moore, “The Phantom menaced: Constraints on low-energy effective ghosts,” Phys. Rev. D70, 043543 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0311312

work page Pith review arXiv 2004
[43]

Dark energy constraints from the cosmic age and super- nova,

Bo Feng, Xiu-Lian Wang, and Xin-Min Zhang, “Dark energy constraints from the cosmic age and super- nova,” Phys. Lett. B607, 35–41 (2005), arXiv:astro- ph/0404224

work page arXiv 2005
[44]

The viability of phantom dark en- ergy: A review,

Kevin J. Ludwick, “The viability of phantom dark en- ergy: A review,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A32, 1730025 (2017), arXiv:1708.06981 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2017
[45]

The Quintom theory of dark energy after DESI DR2

Yifu Cai, Xin Ren, Taotao Qiu, Mingzhe Li, and Xinmin Zhang, “The Quintom theory of dark energy after DESI DR2,” (2025), 10.1093/nsr/nwag115, arXiv:2505.24732 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/nsr/nwag115 2025
[46]

Giar` e, M

William Giarè, Mahdi Najafi, Supriya Pan, Eleonora Di Valentino, and Javad T. Firouzjaee, “Robust prefer- ence for Dynamical Dark Energy in DESI BAO and SN measurements,” JCAP10, 035 (2024), arXiv:2407.16689 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2024
[47]

Li, P.-J

Tian-Nuo Li, Peng-Ju Wu, Guo-Hong Du, Shang-Jie Jin, Hai-Li Li, Jing-Fei Zhang, and Xin Zhang, “Con- straints on Interacting Dark Energy Models from the DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillation and DES Supernovae Data,” Astrophys. J.976, 1 (2024), arXiv:2407.14934 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2024
[48]

Sign switch- ing in dark sector coupling interactions as a candidate for resolving cosmological tensions,

Miguel A. Sabogal, Emanuelly Silva, Rafael C. Nunes, Suresh Kumar, and Eleonora Di Valentino, “Sign switch- ing in dark sector coupling interactions as a candidate for resolving cosmological tensions,” Phys. Rev. D111, 043531 (2025), arXiv:2501.10323 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[49]

Assessing Cosmological Evidence for Nonminimal Coupling,

William J. Wolf, Carlos García-García, Theodore An- ton, and Pedro G. Ferreira, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 081001 (2025), arXiv:2504.07679 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[50]

Li, G.-H

Tian-Nuo Li, Guo-Hong Du, Yun-He Li, Peng-Ju Wu, Shang-Jie Jin, Jing-Fei Zhang, and Xin Zhang, “Probing the sign-changeable interaction between dark energy and dark matter with DESI baryon acoustic oscillations and DES supernovae data,” Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 69, 210413 (2026), arXiv:2501.07361 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2026
[51]

Physical vs phan- tom dark energy after DESI: thawing quintessence in a curved background,

Bikash R. Dinda and Roy Maartens, “Physical vs phan- tom dark energy after DESI: thawing quintessence in a curved background,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.542, L31–L35 (2025), arXiv:2504.15190 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[52]

Thawing quintessence and transient cosmic acceleration in light of DESI,

Rayff de Souza, Gabriel Rodrigues, and Jailson Alcaniz, “Thawing quintessence and transient cosmic acceleration in light of DESI,” Phys. Rev. D112, 083533 (2025), arXiv:2504.16337 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[53]

Akrami, G

Yashar Akrami, George Alestas, and Savvas Nesseris, “Has DESI detected exponential quintessence?” (2025), arXiv:2504.04226 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[54]

Bayat and M

Zahra Bayat and Mark P. Hertzberg, “Examining quintessence models with DESI data,” JCAP08, 065 (2025), arXiv:2505.18937 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[55]

Quintessential dark energy crossing the phantom divide,

Ruiqi Chen, James M. Cline, Varun Muralidharan, and Benjamin Salewicz, “Quintessential dark energy crossing the phantom divide,” JCAP03, 044 (2026), arXiv:2508.19101 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2026
[56]

Cosmic sign-reversal: non-parametric reconstruction of interacting dark en- ergy with DESI DR2,

Yun-He Li and Xin Zhang, “Cosmic sign-reversal: non- parametricreconstructionofinteractingdarkenergywith DESI DR2,” JCAP12, 018 (2025), arXiv:2506.18477 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[57]

Özülker, E

Emre Özülker, Eleonora Di Valentino, and William Gi- arè, “Dark Energy Crosses the Line: Quantifying and Testing the Evidence for Phantom Crossing,” (2025), arXiv:2506.19053 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[58]

Silva and R

Emanuelly Silva and Rafael C. Nunes, “Testing signa- tures of phantom crossing through full-shape galaxy clus- tering analysis,” JCAP11, 078 (2025), arXiv:2507.13989 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[59]

Apparent phantom crossing in Gauss–Bonnet gravity,

Shin’ichi Nojiri, Sergei D. Odintsov, and V. K. Oikonomou, “Apparent phantom crossing in Gauss–Bonnet gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C86, 353 (2026), arXiv:2512.06279 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[60]

Quintom Dark Energy: Future Attractor and Phantom Cross- ing in Light of DESI DR2 Observation,

Phusuda Thanankullaphong, Prasanta Sahoo, Prajwal Hassan Puttasiddappa, and Nandan Roy, “Quintom Dark Energy: Future Attractor and Phantom Cross- ing in Light of DESI DR2 Observation,” (2026), arXiv:2601.02284 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2026
[61]

Quintessence and phantoms in light of DESI 2025,

Ioannis D. Gialamas, Gert Hütsi, Martti Raidal, Juan Urrutia, Martin Vasar, and Hardi Veermäe, “Quintessence and phantoms in light of DESI 2025,” Phys. Rev. D112, 063551 (2025), arXiv:2506.21542 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[62]

Chakraborty, P.K

Amlan Chakraborty, Prolay K. Chanda, Subinoy Das, and Koushik Dutta, “DESI results: Hint towards coupled dark matter and dark energy,” (2025), arXiv:2503.10806 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[63]

Bedroya, G

Alek Bedroya, Georges Obied, Cumrun Vafa, and David H. Wu, “Evolving Dark Sector and the Dark Dimension Scenario,” (2025), arXiv:2507.03090 [astro- ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[64]

Resolving the Planck-DESI tension by nonminimally coupled quintessence

Jia-Qi Wang, Rong-Gen Cai, Zong-Kuan Guo, and Shao-Jiang Wang, “Resolving the Planck-DESI ten- sion by non-minimally coupled quintessence,” (2025), arXiv:2508.01759 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[65]

Exploring Coupled Quintessence in light of CMB and DESI DR2 measurements,

Atul Ashutosh Samanta, Abhijith Ajith, and Sukanta Panda, “Exploring Coupled Quintessence in light of CMB and DESI DR2 measurements,” (2025), arXiv:2509.09624 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[66]

Nojiri, S.D

Shin’ichi Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and V. K. Oikonomou, “Phantom crossing and oscillating dark energy with F(R) gravity,” Phys. Rev. D112, 104035 (2025), arXiv:2506.21010 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[67]

Non-Minimally Coupled Quintessence in Light of DESI,

Samuel Sánchez López, Alexandros Karam, and Dhi- rajKumarHazra,“Non-MinimallyCoupledQuintessence in Light of DESI,” (2025), arXiv:2510.14941 [astro- ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[68]

Mimicking Phantom Dark Energy with Evolving Dark Matter Mass,

Lorenzo La Penna, Alessio Notari, and Michele Redi, “Mimicking Phantom Dark Energy with Evolving Dark Matter Mass,” (2026), arXiv:2601.05235 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2026
[69]

Strong Evidence for Dark Sector Interactions,

Tian-Nuo Li, William Giarè, Guo-Hong Du, Yun-He Li, Eleonora Di Valentino, Jing-Fei Zhang, and Xin Zhang, “Strong Evidence for Dark Sector Interactions,” (2026), arXiv:2601.07361 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2026
[70]

R2-corrected TachyonScalarFieldInflation, theACTData, andPhan- 14 tom Transition,

S. D. Odintsov and V. K. Oikonomou, “R2-corrected TachyonScalarFieldInflation, theACTData, andPhan- 14 tom Transition,” Nucl. Phys. B1025, 117384 (2026), arXiv:2601.21364 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[71]

Is Phantom Divide Crossing in General Relativity Com- pletely Impossible? Shortcomings and Possible Solu- tions,

Shin’ichi Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and V. K. Oikonomou, “Is Phantom Divide Crossing in General Relativity Com- pletely Impossible? Shortcomings and Possible Solu- tions,” (2026), arXiv:2601.21356 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[72]

ShouvikRoyChoudhuryandTeppeiOkumura,“Updated Cosmological Constraints in Extended Parameter Space with Planck PR4, DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, and Supernovae: Dynamical Dark Energy, Neutrino Masses, Lensing Anomaly, and the Hubble Tension,” Astrophys. J. Lett.976, L11 (2024), arXiv:2409.13022 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2024
[73]

Shouvik Roy Choudhury, “Cosmology in Extended Pa- rameter Space with DESI Data Release 2 Baryon Acous- tic Oscillations: A 2σ+ Detection of Nonzero Neutrino Masses with an Update on Dynamical Dark Energy and Lensing Anomaly,” Astrophys. J. Lett.986, L31 (2025), arXiv:2504.15340 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[74]

The Bayesian view of DESI DR2: Evidence and tension in a combined analysis with CMB and supernovae across cosmological models,

Dily Duan Yi Ong, David Yallup, and Will Handley, “The Bayesian view of DESI DR2: Evidence and tension in a combined analysis with CMB and supernovae across cosmological models,” (2026), arXiv:2603.05472 [astro- ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2026
[75]

Wang and D

Deng Wang and David Mota, “Did DESI DR2 truly re- veal dynamical dark energy?” Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1356 (2025), arXiv:2504.15222 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[76]

Roy Choudhury, T

Shouvik Roy Choudhury, Teppei Okumura, and Keiichi Umetsu, “Cosmological Constraints on Nonphantom Dy- namical Dark Energy with DESI Data Release 2 Baryon Acoustic Oscillations: A 3σ+ Lensing Anomaly,” Astro- phys. J. Lett.994, L26 (2025), arXiv:2509.26144 [astro- ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[77]

Cheng, S

Hanyu Cheng, Supriya Pan, and Eleonora Di Valentino, “Beyond Two Parameters: Revisiting Dark Energy with the Latest Cosmic Probes,” Astrophys. J.999, 190 (2026), arXiv:2512.09866 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2026
[78]

On the Analysis Dependence of DESI Dynamical Dark Energy,

Eoin Ó. Colgáin, Saeed Pourojaghi, and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, “On the Analysis Dependence of DESI Dynamical Dark Energy,” Galaxies13, 133 (2025), arXiv:2505.19029 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[79]

Constraints on interacting dark energy models from Planck 2015 and redshift-space distortion data,

André A. Costa, Xiao-Dong Xu, Bin Wang, and E. Ab- dalla, “Constraints on interacting dark energy models from Planck 2015 and redshift-space distortion data,” JCAP01, 028 (2017), arXiv:1605.04138 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2015
[80]

Planck 2015 results. XIV. Dark energy and modified gravity

P. A. R. Adeet al.(Planck), “Planck 2015 results. XIV. Dark energy and modified gravity,” Astron. Astrophys. 594, A14 (2016), arXiv:1502.01590 [astro-ph.CO]

work page Pith review arXiv 2015

Showing first 80 references.