Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 minor 1 cited by

Gravitational decoherence for macroscopic spatial superpositions accumulates logarithmically with distance but remains subdominant to collisional decoherence.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-28 08:43 UTC pith:L2Z2AMDN

load-bearing objection The paper derives an analytic logarithmic form for Newtonian gravitational decoherence on macroscopic wave packets that stays subdominant to collisions.

arxiv 2606.04099 v1 pith:L2Z2AMDN submitted 2026-06-02 gr-qc hep-phhep-thquant-ph

Gravitationally Induced Quantum Decoherence of Macroscopic Objects

Hiroki Takeda , Shogo Tomizuka , Takahiro Tanaka This is my paper
classification gr-qc hep-phhep-thquant-ph
keywords gravitational decoherencequantum superpositionlinearized gravityinfluence functionalmacroscopic objectsNewtonian gravitydecoherence functioncollisional decoherence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper formulates gravitationally induced quantum decoherence for a massive object in spatial superposition by starting from linearized gravity coupled to a massive particle and an environmental scalar field. It derives a closed-time-path influence functional that expresses the decoherence exponent as a bilinear functional of the difference in system stress-energy tensors and an effective noise kernel obtained by dressing the environmental stress-energy tensor correlator with graviton propagators. In the nonrelativistic quasi-static regime the framework is applied to Newtonian long-range gravitational interactions with a dilute nonrelativistic gas modeled by finite wave packets. Controlled approximations then produce analytic expressions for the cumulative decoherence function, revealing that the dominant contribution accumulates logarithmically over a broad range of distances while staying weaker than conventional collisional decoherence under realistic conditions.

Core claim

Starting from linearized gravity coupled to a massive system particle and an environmental scalar field, the decoherence exponent can be written as a bilinear functional of the difference of the system stress-energy tensors and an effective noise kernel obtained by dressing the environmental stress-energy tensor correlator with graviton propagators. For a dilute nonrelativistic gas coarse-grained in time and space, controlled approximations yield analytic expressions for the cumulative decoherence function whose dominant contribution is accumulated logarithmically over a broad range of distances.

What carries the argument

The closed-time-path influence functional in the nonrelativistic quasi-static regime, which produces an effective noise kernel by dressing the environmental stress-energy tensor correlator with graviton propagators.

Load-bearing premise

The environment is modeled as a scalar field coupled through linearized gravity, and the nonrelativistic quasi-static regime is assumed to allow the decoherence exponent to be written as a bilinear functional of the system stress-energy tensors.

What would settle it

A laboratory measurement of excess decoherence rate in a controlled macroscopic superposition as a function of separation distance that either matches or deviates from the predicted logarithmic accumulation after subtracting known collisional contributions.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Analytic expressions for the cumulative decoherence function follow from controlled approximations applied to the Newtonian interaction.
  • The dominant contribution to the decoherence accumulates logarithmically over a broad range of distances.
  • The resulting gravitational decoherence remains subdominant to conventional collisional decoherence under realistic conditions.
  • The framework applies directly to a dilute nonrelativistic gas modeled by finite wave packets and coarse-grained in time and space.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same influence-functional construction could be reused to compare gravitational decoherence against other long-range environmental couplings such as electromagnetic fluctuations.
  • Experiments that suppress collisional decoherence to extremely low levels might become sensitive to the logarithmic gravitational term at larger object separations.
  • The bilinear form on stress-energy tensors suggests a route to generalize the calculation beyond Newtonian gravity to weak-field curved backgrounds.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives a closed-time-path influence functional for gravitationally induced decoherence of a massive object in spatial superposition, starting from linearized gravity coupled to a system particle and an environmental scalar field. In the nonrelativistic quasi-static regime the decoherence exponent is expressed as a bilinear functional of stress-energy tensor differences dressed by an effective noise kernel obtained from graviton propagators acting on the environmental correlator. The framework is applied to a dilute nonrelativistic gas of finite wave packets after coarse-graining; controlled approximations then produce analytic expressions for the cumulative decoherence function, whose dominant term accumulates logarithmically over a broad range of distances yet remains subdominant to conventional collisional decoherence under realistic conditions.

Significance. If the controlled approximations and subdominance result hold, the work supplies analytic expressions and a clear distance dependence (logarithmic) for gravitational decoherence, which is useful for assessing the viability of macroscopic superposition experiments. The construction rests on standard tools (linearized gravity, CTP formalism) without introducing free parameters or ad-hoc cutoffs, and the explicit comparison to collisional decoherence under realistic conditions provides a concrete, falsifiable benchmark. These features constitute a genuine contribution to the quantitative understanding of gravitational decoherence.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Derivation of the influence functional] The abstract states that the approximations are 'controlled' and yield analytic expressions, but the main text should explicitly state the expansion parameter, the order retained, and the estimated remainder term (e.g., in the section deriving the influence functional).
  2. [Application to dilute gas] The modeling of the environmental scalar field and the precise manner in which its stress-energy correlator is dressed by the graviton propagator should be written with an explicit equation for the noise kernel to allow direct reproduction of the logarithmic term.
  3. [Comparison to collisional decoherence] The comparison to collisional decoherence would be strengthened by listing the numerical values of the parameters (density, temperature, scattering cross-section) used to establish subdominance.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and positive assessment of our manuscript. The summary accurately captures the derivation and main results, and we appreciate the recognition of the work's contribution to quantitative understanding of gravitational decoherence. As no specific major comments were raised, we will proceed with minor revisions to address any editorial or presentational suggestions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained from external standards

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain begins from linearized gravity coupled to a scalar field and the closed-time-path influence functional, both standard external frameworks not defined within the paper. The decoherence exponent is expressed as a bilinear functional of stress-energy tensors dressed by graviton propagators, then applied to a dilute gas via controlled approximations yielding analytic expressions. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-citation, or prior ansatz from the same authors; the logarithmic accumulation and subdominance comparison follow directly from the stated nonrelativistic quasi-static regime without internal redefinition or renaming of inputs as outputs. The framework remains independent of the target result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is necessarily incomplete; the listed items are the minimal structural assumptions extractable from the provided text.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Linearized gravity is sufficient to couple the system to the environment
    Invoked at the start of the formulation to derive the influence functional.
  • domain assumption Nonrelativistic and quasi-static regime applies
    Used to reduce the decoherence exponent to a bilinear functional of stress-energy tensors.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5696 in / 1543 out tokens · 32587 ms · 2026-06-28T08:43:15.976812+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We formulate the gravitationally induced quantum decoherence of a massive object prepared in a spatial superposition. Starting from linearized gravity coupled to a massive system particle and an environmental scalar field, we derive a closed-time-path influence functional governing the reduced system dynamics. In the nonrelativistic and quasi-static regime, the decoherence exponent can be written as a bilinear functional of the difference of the system stress-energy tensors and an effective noise kernel obtained by dressing the environmental stress-energy tensor correlator with graviton propagators. We then apply this framework to the Newtonian long-range gravitational interaction and evaluate the resulting decoherence function for a dilute nonrelativistic gas modeled by finite wave packets and coarse-grained in time and space. By performing controlled approximations, we obtain analytic expressions for the cumulative decoherence function and show that the dominant contribution is accumulated logarithmically over a broad range of distances, while remaining subdominant to conventional collisional decoherence under realistic conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.04099 by Hiroki Takeda, Shogo Tomizuka, Takahiro Tanaka.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Diagrammatic representation of the Wick contraction contributing to the windowed density-density correlator entering [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Contour plot of log [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Contour plots of log [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Graviton-induced which-path decoherence in matter-wave interferometry

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Radiative graviton decoherence in matter-wave interferometers is shown to be far below detection, even with strongly squeezed inflationary graviton states.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 15 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A. D. Cronin, J. Schmiedmayer, and D. E. Pritchard, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 1051 (2009), arXiv:0712.3703 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  2. [2]

    Cavity Optomechanics

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 1391 (2014), arXiv:1303.0733 [cond-mat.mes- hall]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  3. [3]

    Testing the limits of quantum mechanical superpositions

    M. Arndt and K. Hornberger, Nature Phys.10, 271 (2014), arXiv:1410.0270 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  4. [4]

    Millen, T

    J. Millen, T. S. Monteiro, R. Pettit, and A. N. Vamivakas, Rept. Prog. Phys.83, 026401 (2020), arXiv:1907.08198 [physics.optics]

    work page arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 035002 (2017), arXiv:1611.02427 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    Carneyet al., Quantum Sci

    D. Carneyet al., Quantum Sci. Technol.6, 024002 (2021), arXiv:2008.06074 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    S. Bose, A. Mazumdar, G. W. Morley, H. Ulbricht, M. Toroˇ s, M. Paternostro, A. Geraci, P. Barker, M. S. Kim, and G. Milburn, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 240401 (2017), arXiv:1707.06050 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    Gravitationally-induced entanglement between two massive particles is sufficient evidence of quantum effects in gravity

    C. Marletto and V. Vedral, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 240402 (2017), arXiv:1707.06036 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  9. [9]

    H. D. Zeh, Found. Phys.1, 69 (1970)

    1970

  10. [10]

    W. H. Zurek, Phys. Rev. D24, 1516 (1981)

    1981

  11. [11]

    W. H. Zurek, Phys. Rev. D26, 1862 (1982)

    1982

  12. [12]

    Giulini, C

    D. Giulini, C. Kiefer, E. Joos, J. Kupsch, I. O. Stamatescu, and H. D. Zeh,Decoherence and the appearance of a classical world in quantum theory(1996)

    1996

  13. [13]

    W. H. Zurek, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 715 (2003), arXiv:quant-ph/0105127

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  14. [14]

    Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics

    M. Schlosshauer, Rev. Mod. Phys.76, 1267 (2004), arXiv:quant-ph/0312059

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  15. [15]

    Schlosshauer,Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition(Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007)

    M. Schlosshauer,Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition(Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007)

    2007

  16. [16]

    Quantum Decoherence

    M. Schlosshauer, Phys. Rept.831, 1 (2019), arXiv:1911.06282 [quant-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    Joos and H

    E. Joos and H. D. Zeh, Z. Phys. B59, 223 (1985)

    1985

  18. [18]

    M. R. Gallis and G. N. Fleming, Phys. Rev. A42, 38 (1990)

    1990

  19. [19]

    Collisional decoherence reexamined

    K. Hornberger and J. E. Sipe, Phys. Rev. A68, 012105 (2003), arXiv:quant-ph/0303094

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  20. [20]

    R. P. Feynman and F. L. Vernon, Jr., Annals Phys.24, 118 (1963)

    1963

  21. [21]

    J. S. Schwinger, J. Math. Phys.2, 407 (1961)

    1961

  22. [22]

    L. V. Keldysh, Sov. Phys. JETP20, 1018 (1965)

    1965

  23. [23]

    E. A. Calzetta and B. L. Hu,Nonequilibrium Quantum Field Theory(Oxford University Press, 2009)

    2009

  24. [24]

    A Master Equation for Gravitational Decoherence: Probing the Textures of Spacetime

    C. Anastopoulos and B. L. Hu, Class. Quant. Grav.30, 165007 (2013), arXiv:1305.5231 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  25. [25]

    M. P. Blencowe, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 021302 (2013), arXiv:1211.4751 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  26. [26]

    Gerlich, S

    S. Gerlich, S. Eibenberger, M. Tomandl, S. Nimmrichter, K. Hornberger, P. J. Fagan, J. T¨ uxen, M. Mayor, and M. Arndt, Nature Commun.2, 263 (2011)

    2011

  27. [27]

    Kovachy, P

    T. Kovachy, P. Asenbaum, C. Overstreet, C. A. Donnelly, S. M. Dickerson, A. Sugarbaker, J. M. Hogan, and M. A. Kasevich, Nature528, 530 (2015)

    2015

  28. [28]

    Near-field interferometry of a free-falling nanoparticle from a point-like source

    J. Bateman, S. Nimmrichter, K. Hornberger, and H. Ulbricht, Nature Commun.5, 4788 (2014), arXiv:1312.0500 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  29. [29]

    Large Quantum Superpositions and Interference of Massive Nanometer-Sized Objects

    O. Romero-Isart, A. C. Pflanzer, F. Blaser, R. Kaltenbaek, N. Kiesel, M. Aspelmeyer, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 020405 (2011), arXiv:1103.4081 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  30. [30]

    Eichenfield, J

    M. Eichenfield, J. Chan, R. M. Camacho, K. J. Vahala, and O. Painter, Nature462, 78 (2009)

    2009

  31. [31]

    Towards quantum superpositions of a mirror

    W. Marshall, C. Simon, R. Penrose, and D. Bouwmeester, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 130401 (2003), arXiv:quant-ph/0210001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  32. [32]

    J. D. Teufel, T. Donner, D. Li, J. W. Harlow, M. S. Allman, K. Cicak, A. J. Sirois, J. D. Whittaker, K. W. Lehnert, and R. W. Simmonds, Nature475, 359 (2011), arXiv:1103.2144 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011