pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yet

Canonical reference. 88% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

64 Pith papers citing it
Background 88% of classified citations
abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as a groundbreaking technology with their unparalleled text generation capabilities across various applications. Nevertheless, concerns persist regarding the accuracy and appropriateness of their generated content. A contemporary methodology, self-correction, has been proposed as a remedy to these issues. Building upon this premise, this paper critically examines the role and efficacy of self-correction within LLMs, shedding light on its true potential and limitations. Central to our investigation is the notion of intrinsic self-correction, whereby an LLM attempts to correct its initial responses based solely on its inherent capabilities, without the crutch of external feedback. In the context of reasoning, our research indicates that LLMs struggle to self-correct their responses without external feedback, and at times, their performance even degrades after self-correction. Drawing from these insights, we offer suggestions for future research and practical applications in this field.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 7 baseline 1

citation-polarity summary

representative citing papers

AIP: A Graph Representation for Learning and Governing Agent Skills

cs.AI · 2026-06-03 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

AIP models skills as graphs of discrete steps connected by typed I/O edges under a validated schema, raising agent mean reward from 0.60 to 0.71 and pass rate from 53% to 67% on 27 SkillsBench tasks while enabling node-level fixes.

ETCHR: Editing To Clarify and Harness Reasoning

cs.CV · 2026-05-22 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

A decoupled question-conditioned image editor trained via supervised imitation then VLM-reward enhancement improves MLLM visual reasoning Pass@1 by 4.6-5.5 points across models and tasks.

CATPO: Critique-Augmented Tree Policy Optimization

cs.CL · 2026-06-06 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

CATPO introduces an informativeness score F(T) and critique-guided healing for failed trees to improve efficiency and performance in tree-based RLVR, reaching 37.5% macro accuracy on math benchmarks.

The Self-Correction Illusion: LLMs Correct Others but Not Themselves

cs.AI · 2026-06-04 · conditional · novelty 6.0

Relabeling an identical erroneous claim from the model's own thought role to an external chat role increases explicit correction rates by 23-93 percentage points across 13 model-domain cells, indicating a chat-template artifact rather than a cognitive deficit.

Provably Secure Agent Guardrail

cs.AI · 2026-05-28 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Introduces ePCA framework using neural-symbolic isolation to force agents to formalize intentions as logical constraints, claiming zero attack success and false positive rates in tested scenarios.

citing papers explorer

Showing 14 of 64 citing papers.