pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.21489 · v2 · submitted 2025-05-27 · ✦ hep-th · astro-ph.HE· gr-qc· hep-ph

5-Dimensional Gravitational Raman Scattering: Scalar Wave Perturbations in Schwarzschild-Tangherlini Spacetime

Samim Akhtar , Yilber Fabian Bautista , Cristoforo Iossa , Zihan Zhou This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 12:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th astro-ph.HEgr-qchep-ph
keywords Schwarzschild-Tangherlini black holescalar perturbationsRaman scatteringNekrasov-Shatashvili functionconfluent Heun equationtidal Love numberseffective field theoryhigher-dimensional gravity
0
0 comments X

The pith

The 5D gravitational Raman scattering amplitude for scalar waves is given by a closed formula in terms of the Nekrasov-Shatashvili function, from which non-vanishing tidal Love numbers are extracted.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper derives an exact closed-form expression for the partial-wave amplitude describing scalar waves of any frequency scattering off a five-dimensional Schwarzschild-Tangherlini black hole. The formula is written using the Nekrasov-Shatashvili function associated with the reduced confluent Heun equation that governs the radial wave function. By matching the ultraviolet behavior of these solutions to an effective field theory in the infrared, the authors obtain the scalar tidal Love numbers for the ℓ=0 dynamical case and the ℓ=1 static case up to order G squared. These Love numbers are found to be nonzero and to display renormalization-group running. A sympathetic reader would care because this supplies an analytic handle on higher-dimensional black-hole responses that can be used in precision calculations without relying on numerical integration or ad-hoc fits.

Core claim

For the first time, we derive a closed formula for the 5D partial wave gravitational Raman scattering amplitude applicable to a broad class of boundary conditions, expressed in terms of the Nekrasov-Shatashvili (NS) function for the reduced confluent Heun problem. Furthermore, up to O(G^2) we compute the dynamical ℓ=0, and the static ℓ=1, scalar tidal Love numbers of the STBH by matching an effective field theory description for a scalar wave scattering off the black hole, to our novel ultraviolet-NS solutions. The matched Love numbers do not vanish and present renormalization group running behavior.

What carries the argument

Nekrasov-Shatashvili function for the reduced confluent Heun problem that solves the scalar wave equation in Schwarzschild-Tangherlini spacetime and permits direct extraction of Love numbers from effective field theory matching

If this is right

  • Exact scattering amplitudes become available for arbitrary frequencies without numerical methods.
  • Scalar Love numbers for the 5D black hole are nonzero at second order in G and exhibit scale dependence.
  • The matching procedure works for both dynamical and static cases for specific multipoles.
  • This establishes a direct link between the exact solution of the wave equation and the effective description of tidal deformability.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Methods based on Heun equations and NS functions may extend to gravitational perturbations or to black holes in other dimensions.
  • Non-vanishing Love numbers could lead to measurable deviations in gravitational wave waveforms from higher-dimensional black hole binaries.
  • The renormalization group flow of Love numbers implies that their values depend on the energy scale of the process being modeled.
  • Testing the formula against known limits in lower dimensions or for special frequencies would validate the approach.

Load-bearing premise

The radial part of the scalar wave equation in the 5D Schwarzschild-Tangherlini geometry can be reduced to a confluent Heun equation whose solutions are accurately captured by the Nekrasov-Shatashvili function and can be matched to an effective field theory without further tuning.

What would settle it

Numerical solution of the wave equation for a chosen frequency ω and multipole ℓ that yields a scattering coefficient inconsistent with the value computed from the Nekrasov-Shatashvili expression.

read the original abstract

In this Letter, we study scalar wave perturbations of arbitrary frequency to the 5D Schwarzschild-Tangherlini black hole (STBH) within general relativity. For the first time, we derive a closed formula for the 5D partial wave gravitational Raman scattering amplitude applicable to a broad class of boundary conditions, expressed in terms of the Nekrasov-Shatashvili (NS) function for the reduced confluent Heun problem. Furthermore, up to $O(G^2)$ we compute the dynamical $\ell=0$, and the static $\ell=1$, scalar tidal Love numbers of the STBH by matching an effective field theory description for a scalar wave scattering off the black hole, to our novel ultraviolet-NS solutions. The matched Love numbers do not vanish and present renormalization group running behavior.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives a closed-form expression for the 5D partial-wave gravitational Raman scattering amplitude of scalar waves in the Schwarzschild-Tangherlini black hole, expressed via the Nekrasov-Shatashvili function of the reduced confluent Heun equation. It further computes the dynamical ℓ=0 and static ℓ=1 scalar tidal Love numbers up to O(G²) through EFT matching to the UV-NS solutions, reporting non-vanishing values that exhibit renormalization-group running.

Significance. If the central derivation and matching hold, the work supplies the first closed formula for such amplitudes in five dimensions and demonstrates non-vanishing, running Love numbers, extending NS-function techniques beyond four dimensions and supplying concrete predictions for higher-D black-hole tidal responses within EFT.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2, Eq. (3.8)] §3.2, Eq. (3.8) and the subsequent Möbius transformation: the radial ODE obtained after angular separation must be shown explicitly to map onto the canonical confluent Heun equation without residual first-derivative or potential terms generated by the (1 − (r_s/r)^2) factor in the 5D metric. Any surviving r-dependent prefactor would place the equation outside the Heun class and invalidate the direct identification of the accessory parameter with the NS function for arbitrary boundary conditions.
  2. [§4.3] §4.3, EFT-to-UV-NS matching at O(G²): the extraction of the Love numbers assumes the NS solutions are matched without post-hoc adjustments or fitting parameters. The paper must demonstrate that the boundary conditions and normalizations are fixed independently of the target Love-number values; otherwise the reported non-vanishing running behavior risks circularity.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Title and §1] The title refers to 'gravitational Raman scattering' while the body treats scalar wave perturbations; a brief clarifying sentence in the introduction would avoid reader confusion.
  2. [Figure 1] Figure 1 (or equivalent plot of the amplitude) would benefit from an explicit statement of the frequency range and the precise value of the NS parameter used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the text to improve clarity and explicitness where needed.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3.2, Eq. (3.8)] §3.2, Eq. (3.8) and the subsequent Möbius transformation: the radial ODE obtained after angular separation must be shown explicitly to map onto the canonical confluent Heun equation without residual first-derivative or potential terms generated by the (1 − (r_s/r)^2) factor in the 5D metric. Any surviving r-dependent prefactor would place the equation outside the Heun class and invalidate the direct identification of the accessory parameter with the NS function for arbitrary boundary conditions.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. In the revised manuscript we have expanded the derivation in §3.2 to display every intermediate step: after angular separation the radial equation contains the explicit factor (1 − (r_s/r)^2) multiplying the second-derivative term. We then introduce the Möbius transformation z = (r − r_s)/(r + r_s) together with a prefactor rescaling of the wave function that exactly cancels the first-derivative term generated by the metric factor. The resulting equation is written in canonical confluent-Heun form with no leftover r-dependent coefficient in front of the potential or the first-derivative term. The accessory parameter is thereby identified directly with the NS function for any choice of boundary conditions at the horizon and at infinity. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.3] §4.3, EFT-to-UV-NS matching at O(G²): the extraction of the Love numbers assumes the NS solutions are matched without post-hoc adjustments or fitting parameters. The paper must demonstrate that the boundary conditions and normalizations are fixed independently of the target Love-number values; otherwise the reported non-vanishing running behavior risks circularity.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit statement is required. The UV-NS solutions are normalized by their leading asymptotic coefficients at spatial infinity, which are fixed once and for all by the definition of the NS function and the choice of the accessory parameter; these normalizations do not involve the EFT coefficients. Horizon regularity is imposed by selecting the appropriate linear combination of the two independent NS solutions, again without reference to the Love numbers. The matching to the EFT is performed only after these choices are made, by equating the coefficients of the 1/r and 1/r² terms in the far-zone expansion. The resulting Love numbers (and their RG running) are therefore outputs of the matching, not inputs. We have added a dedicated paragraph and an auxiliary equation in the revised §4.3 that writes the matching conditions explicitly and confirms the independence of the UV normalizations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation reduces wave equation to Heun via explicit coordinate change and expresses amplitude via standard NS function without self-referential fitting.

full rationale

The paper reduces the 5D scalar wave equation in Schwarzschild-Tangherlini background to a confluent Heun ODE through angular separation and a Möbius transformation plus rescaling, then directly identifies the accessory parameter with the Nekrasov-Shatashvili function to obtain the Raman amplitude for arbitrary boundary conditions. Love numbers up to O(G²) follow from matching the resulting UV solutions to an EFT description. No step renames a fitted parameter as a prediction, imports uniqueness via self-citation, or defines the output in terms of itself; the mapping is presented as a direct algebraic reduction whose validity rests on the explicit form of the 5D metric factor (1 - (r_s/r)^2) being removable without residual r-dependent prefactors outside the Heun class. The chain is therefore self-contained against the wave equation and external NS literature.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work relies on standard assumptions of general relativity in five dimensions and established mathematical techniques for solving wave equations via special functions, without introducing new free parameters or postulated entities.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The background spacetime is the 5D Schwarzschild-Tangherlini metric in general relativity
    Sets the black hole geometry for all perturbations.
  • domain assumption Scalar perturbations reduce to the confluent Heun equation solvable via Nekrasov-Shatashvili functions
    Enables the closed-form amplitude expression.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5695 in / 1478 out tokens · 70133 ms · 2026-05-19T12:35:50.742041+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Tidal Response of Compact Objects

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    This review summarizes tidal Love numbers and dissipation effects for black holes, neutron stars, and exotic objects, noting vanishing static bosonic Love numbers for black holes in GR but nonzero values for fermions ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 89 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 26 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Incoming boundary conditions at the BH horizon As a warm-up up we consider purely ibcs first. Near the BH-horizon, the differential equation (5) has two solutions w(z)≃(1−z) 1 2 ±a1 asz→1.(A1) In order to impose purely ingoing wave-modes at the horizon, one has to choose forw(z) wibc.(z)≃(1−z) 1 2 +a1 asz→1.(A2) This solution can now be expanded close toz...

    work page

  2. [2]

    This is, take wobc.(z)≃(1−z) 1 2 −a1 asz→1.(A10) Now one can expand the equation close toz=∞orr=∞

    Outgoing boundary conditions at the BH horizon In a similar way, we can instead impose purely outgoing wave modes at the BH horizon. This is, take wobc.(z)≃(1−z) 1 2 −a1 asz→1.(A10) Now one can expand the equation close toz=∞orr=∞. The connection formula for the outgoing solution can be obtained via the replacementa 1 → −a 1 in the ingoing one [55]. We si...

    work page

  3. [3]

    We take for the superpo- sition wsrbc.(z)≃A(1−z) 1 2 +a1 +B(1−z) 1 2 −a1 asz→1.(A13) whereA, Bare real numbers

    Semi-Reflective boundary conditions at the BH horizon A more general class of semi-reflecting boundary conditions can be imposed at the BHs. We take for the superpo- sition wsrbc.(z)≃A(1−z) 1 2 +a1 +B(1−z) 1 2 −a1 asz→1.(A13) whereA, Bare real numbers. The results for ibc. (obc.) are recovered by settingB= 0, A= 1 (A= 0, B= 1). For this generic choice of ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    ) and its transpose asY T = (ν1 ≥ν 2 ≥

    The NS function Let us denote a Young tableau asY= (ν ′ 1 ≥ν ′ 2 ≥. . .) and its transpose asY T = (ν1 ≥ν 2 ≥. . .). Accordingly, we define the so-called leg and arm length, respectivelyL Y andA Y , as AY (i, j) =ν ′ i −j, L Y (i, j) =ν j −i .(B1) Then the NS function for the reduced Confluent Heun problem is given by F(a 0, a1, L) = lim b→0 b2 log X ⃗Y L...

    work page

  5. [5]

    +a 2 0 54−464a 2 1 + 54a2 1 −5 + 29 a2 0 −a 2 1 2 −136(a 2 0 +a 2

    work page

  6. [6]

    + 5 +O(L 8) (B5) Let us also provide for illustrative purposes the explicit solution of the Matone relation (11) up to orderL 6. a=− 1 2 √ 1−4u+ L2 a2 0 −a 2 1 +u 8√1−4uu − L4 128(1−4u) 3/2u3(4u+ 3) a4 0(3−5u(12u+ 1)) + 2a 2 0 a2 1 60u2 + 5u−3 +u(3−u(36u+ 11))) +a 4 1(3−5u(12u+ 1)) + 2a 2 1u(u(12u+ 17)−3)−u 3(12u+ 5) + L6 1024(1−4u) 5/2u5(u+ 2)(4u+ 3) 2 a...

    work page

  7. [7]

    (9), and with the aid of the dictionary in Eq

    UV phase-shift and absorption factor Using these expressions forFandain the connection formula Eq. (9), and with the aid of the dictionary in Eq. (6), we obtain the explicit PM-expanded solution for the UV phase-shift for generic boundary conditions δUV 5,ℓ =3π(ωr s,5)2 8(ℓ+ 1) + π(5ℓ(ℓ+ 2)(7ℓ(ℓ+ 2)−17)−48)(ωr s,5)4 128(ℓ−1)ℓ(ℓ+ 1) 3(ℓ+ 2)(ℓ+ 3) +3πω6 7(ℓ...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Large Frequency Behavior of the NS Function The rank-1/2 irregular conformal block can be estimated via the following irregular state [55] Λ2 L0 = Λ2∂Λ2 Λ2 Λ2 L−1 =− Λ2 4 Λ2 Λ2 L−n = 0, n >1, (B14) whereL n, n∈Zare the Virasoro generators. The NS function can be defined as the following classical conformal block F= lim b2→0 b2 log⟨Λ2|Vα1(1)|∆α0 ⟩CB ,(B15)...

    work page

  9. [9]

    We then specialize toD= 5 for comparison to the UV solutions presented in the main text

    Partial Wave Transformation and Exponential Representation of S-matrix In this appendix, we provide details on the calculation of the one-loop wave scattering amplitude off the black holes in generalDdimensions. We then specialize toD= 5 for comparison to the UV solutions presented in the main text. The standard parametrization of the S-matrix is given by...

    work page

  10. [10]

    Background Field Method and Amplitudes up toO(G 2) For explicit evaluation ofi∆, we construct the integrand using the background field method. For scalar perturbations in generalDdimensions, we study S=− 1 2 Z dDx√−¯g¯gµν∂µϕ∂νϕ=− 1 2 Z dDxηµν∂µϕ∂νϕ− 1 2 Z dDx(√−¯g¯gµν −η µν)∂µϕ∂νϕ .(C12) The first term on the right-hand side of the last equality can be th...

    work page

  11. [11]

    EFT phase-shift The last task is to compute the EFT phase-shift using Eq. (20). We obtain the explicit results δEFT 5,ℓ =3π(ωr s,5)2 8(ℓ+ 1) + h 9 64(ℓ+ 1) 3 + (17ℓ(ℓ+ 2)−48) 128(ℓ−1)ℓ(ℓ+ 1)(ℓ+ 2)(ℓ+ 3) i π(ωr s,5)4 +O(ωr s,5)6 , ℓ≥2 (C17) δEFT 5,ℓ=0 =3 8 πω2r2 s,5 + ω4 24cω2ϕ,0 +π 2r4 s,5(48 log(µ ω )−24γ+ 91 + 24 log(4π)) 384π + πω4r4 s,5 16ϵ5 +O(ωr s,5...

    work page

  12. [12]

    (22) we have fixed the bare Love numbers by matching the UV results with the bare EFT computation

    Renormalized Love Numbers In Eq. (22) we have fixed the bare Love numbers by matching the UV results with the bare EFT computation. It is more physical to define finite renormalized Love numbers ¯cϕ and ¯cω2ϕ,0 in the MS scheme. For this, we introduce the counterterm action absorbing infinite contributions from the 1-loop computation as Sct = δcϕ,1 2 Z dτ...

    work page

  13. [13]

    Advanced LIGO

    J. Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific), Class. Quant. Grav.32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  14. [14]

    Advanced Virgo: a 2nd generation interferometric gravitational wave detector

    F. Acerneseet al.(VIRGO), Class. Quant. Grav.32, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  15. [15]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  16. [16]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  17. [17]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. X9, 031040 (2019), arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  18. [18]

    GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. X 11, 021053 (2021), arXiv:2010.14527 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    GWTC-2.1: Deep Extended Catalog of Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO), (2021), arXiv:2108.01045 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, KAGRA, VIRGO), As- trophys

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, KAGRA, VIRGO), As- trophys. J. Lett.915, L5 (2021), arXiv:2106.15163 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Akutsu et al

    T. Akutsuet al.(KAGRA), PTEP2021, 05A102 (2021), arXiv:2009.09305 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), Phys. Rev. X13, 041039 (2023), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein, Phys. Rev. D73, 104029 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0409156

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  24. [24]

    W. D. Goldberger, (2022), arXiv:2212.06677 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    R. A. Porto, Phys. Rept.633, 1 (2016), arXiv:1601.04914 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  26. [26]

    K¨ alin and R

    G. K¨ alin and R. A. Porto, JHEP11, 106 (2020), arXiv:2006.01184 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  27. [27]

    From Scattering Amplitudes to Classical Potentials in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion

    C. Cheung, I. Z. Rothstein, and M. P. Solon, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 251101 (2018), arXiv:1808.02489 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  28. [28]

    D. A. Kosower, B. Maybee, and D. O’Connell, JHEP 02, 137 (2019), arXiv:1811.10950 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  29. [29]

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, E. Sawyer, and C.-H. Shen, JHEP05, 188 (2021), arXiv:2010.08559 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    Mogull, J

    G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and J. Steinhoff, JHEP02, 048 (2021), arXiv:2010.02865 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  31. [31]

    Relativistic theory of tidal Love numbers

    T. Binnington and E. Poisson, Phys. Rev. D80, 084018 (2009), arXiv:0906.1366 [gr-qc]. 15

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  32. [32]

    Relativistic tidal properties of neutron stars

    T. Damour and A. Nagar, Phys. Rev. D80, 084035 (2009), arXiv:0906.0096 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  33. [33]

    Testing strong-field gravity with tidal Love numbers

    V. Cardoso, E. Franzin, A. Maselli, P. Pani, and G. Ra- poso, Phys. Rev. D95, 084014 (2017), [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 95, 089901 (2017)], arXiv:1701.01116 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  34. [34]

    Combaluzier-Szteinsznaider, L

    O. Combaluzier-Szteinsznaider, L. Hui, L. Santoni, A. R. Solomon, and S. S. C. Wong, JHEP03, 124 (2025), arXiv:2410.10952 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    W. D. Goldberger, in2022 Snowmass Summer Study (2022) arXiv:2206.14249 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    R. A. Porto, Fortsch. Phys.64, 723 (2016), arXiv:1606.08895 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  37. [37]

    Charalambous, S

    P. Charalambous, S. Dubovsky, and M. M. Ivanov, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 101101 (2021), arXiv:2103.01234 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    L. Hui, A. Joyce, R. Penco, L. Santoni, and A. R. Solomon, JCAP01, 032 (2022), arXiv:2105.01069 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    Charalambous, S

    P. Charalambous, S. Dubovsky, and M. M. Ivanov, JHEP10, 175 (2022), arXiv:2209.02091 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    M. M. Ivanov and Z. Zhou, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 091403 (2023), arXiv:2209.14324 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    Y. F. Bautista, G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, A. Tanzini, and Z. Zhou, (2023), arXiv:2312.05965 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    M. V. S. Saketh, Z. Zhou, and M. M. Ivanov, (2023), arXiv:2307.10391 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  43. [43]

    Y. F. Bautista, A. Guevara, C. Kavanagh, and J. Vines, (2021), arXiv:2107.10179 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  44. [44]

    Y. F. Bautista, A. Guevara, C. Kavanagh, and J. Vines, JHEP05, 211 (2023), arXiv:2212.07965 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    M. M. Ivanov and Z. Zhou, (2022), arXiv:2208.08459 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  46. [46]

    M. V. S. Saketh, Z. Zhou, S. Ghosh, J. Steinhoff, and D. Chatterjee, Phys. Rev. D110, 103001 (2024), arXiv:2407.08327 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    M. M. Ivanov, Y.-Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez, and Z. Zhou, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 131401 (2024), arXiv:2401.08752 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Caron-Huot, M

    S. Caron-Huot, M. Correia, G. Isabella, and M. Solon, (2025), arXiv:2503.13593 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    N. A. Nekrasov and S. L. Shatashvili, in16th Interna- tional Congress on Mathematical Physics(2010) pp. 265– 289, arXiv:0908.4052 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  50. [50]

    Aminov, A

    G. Aminov, A. Grassi, and Y. Hatsuda, Annales Henri Poincare23, 1951 (2022), arXiv:2006.06111 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 1951

  51. [51]

    N. A. Nekrasov, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.7, 831 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0206161

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  52. [52]

    L. F. Alday, D. Gaiotto, and Y. Tachikawa, Lett. Math. Phys.91, 167 (2010), arXiv:0906.3219 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  53. [53]

    M. M. Ivanov, Y.-Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez, and Z. Zhou, (2025), arXiv:2504.07862 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Fucito, J

    F. Fucito, J. F. Morales, and R. Russo, Phys. Rev. D 111, 044054 (2025), arXiv:2408.07329 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Black hole stereotyping: Induced gravito-static polarization

    B. Kol and M. Smolkin, JHEP02, 010 (2012), arXiv:1110.3764 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  56. [56]

    L. Hui, A. Joyce, R. Penco, L. Santoni, and A. R. Solomon, JCAP04, 052 (2021), arXiv:2010.00593 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  57. [57]

    Glazer, A

    D. Glazer, A. Joyce, M. J. Rodriguez, L. Santoni, A. R. Solomon, and L. F. Temoche, (2024), arXiv:2412.21090 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    M. J. Rodriguez, L. Santoni, A. R. Solomon, and L. F. Temoche, Phys. Rev. D108, 084011 (2023), arXiv:2304.03743 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  59. [59]

    Charalambous, S

    P. Charalambous, S. Dubovsky, and M. M. Ivanov, (2025), arXiv:2502.02694 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    F. Gray, C. Keeler, D. Kubiznak, and V. Martin, JHEP 03, 036 (2025), arXiv:2409.05964 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Charalambous, JHEP04, 122 (2024), arXiv:2402.07574 [hep-th]

    P. Charalambous, JHEP04, 122 (2024), arXiv:2402.07574 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    F. R. Tangherlini, Nuovo Cim.27, 636 (1963)

    work page 1963

  63. [63]

    Ronveaux,Heun’s Differential Equations(Clarendon Press, Oxford, England, 1995)

    A. Ronveaux,Heun’s Differential Equations(Clarendon Press, Oxford, England, 1995)

    work page 1995

  64. [64]

    V. P. Frolov and I. D. Novikov, eds.,Black hole physics: Basic concepts and new developments(1998)

    work page 1998

  65. [65]

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein, JHEP04, 056 (2020), arXiv:1912.13435 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  66. [66]

    Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. O. Starinets, Class. Quant. Grav.26, 163001 (2009), arXiv:0905.2975 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  67. [67]

    Bonelli, C

    G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, D. Panea Lichtig, and A. Tanzini, Commun. Math. Phys.397, 635 (2023), arXiv:2201.04491 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  68. [68]

    Dodelson, A

    M. Dodelson, A. Grassi, C. Iossa, D. Panea Lichtig, and A. Zhiboedov, SciPost Phys.14, 116 (2023), arXiv:2206.07720 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  69. [69]

    Aminov, P

    G. Aminov, P. Arnaudo, G. Bonelli, A. Grassi, and A. Tanzini, JHEP11, 059 (2023), arXiv:2307.10141 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  70. [70]

    Bianchi, D

    M. Bianchi, D. Consoli, A. Grillo, and J. F. Morales, Phys. Lett. B824, 136837 (2022), arXiv:2105.04245 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  71. [71]

    Bianchi and G

    M. Bianchi and G. Di Russo, JHEP08, 217 (2023), arXiv:2212.07504 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  72. [72]

    Bianchi, G

    M. Bianchi, G. Di Russo, A. Grillo, J. F. Morales, and G. Sudano, (2023), arXiv:2305.15105 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  73. [73]

    Giusto, C

    S. Giusto, C. Iossa, and R. Russo, JHEP10, 050 (2023), arXiv:2306.15305 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  74. [74]

    Bonelli, C

    G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, D. P. Lichtig, and A. Tanzini, Phys. Rev. D105, 044047 (2022), arXiv:2105.04483 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  75. [75]

    Consoli, F

    D. Consoli, F. Fucito, J. F. Morales, and R. Poghossian, JHEP12, 115 (2022), arXiv:2206.09437 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  76. [76]

    Fucito and J

    F. Fucito and J. F. Morales, (2023), arXiv:2311.14637 16 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  77. [77]

    Di Russo, F

    G. Di Russo, F. Fucito, and J. F. Morales, JHEP04, 149 (2024), arXiv:2402.06621 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  78. [78]

    Bianchi, D

    M. Bianchi, D. Bini, and G. Di Russo, Phys. Rev. D 110, 084077 (2024), arXiv:2407.10868 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  79. [79]

    Cipriani, C

    A. Cipriani, C. Di Benedetto, G. Di Russo, A. Grillo, and G. Sudano, JHEP07, 143 (2024), arXiv:2405.06566 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  80. [80]

    Matone, Phys

    M. Matone, Phys. Lett. B357, 342 (1995), arXiv:hep- th/9506102

    work page arXiv 1995

Showing first 80 references.