pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.18358 · v2 · submitted 2025-08-25 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

The Missing Hard Photons of Little Red Dots: Their Incident Ionizing Spectra Resemble Massive Stars

Bingjie Wang , Joel Leja , Harley Katz , Kohei Inayoshi , Nikko J. Cleri , Anna de Graaff , Raphael E. Hviding , Pieter van Dokkum
show 6 more authors
Jenny E. Greene Ivo Labb\'e Jorryt Matthee Ian McConachie Rohan P. Naidu Erica J. Nelson
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 21:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords Little Red Dotsionizing spectraHeIIH-alpharecombination linesAGNmassive starsphotoionization modeling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Little Red Dots have soft incident ionizing spectra resembling massive stars rather than standard AGN.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses recombination lines to probe the central engines of Little Red Dots instead of their continuum light. High H-alpha equivalent widths demand far more hydrogen-ionizing photons than even the bluest AGN spectra supply, while the low HeII/H-beta ratio of roughly 0.01 signals a lack of harder photons. This combination points to an unusually soft spectrum. A reader would care because it undercuts the default assumption that LRDs are ordinary accreting black holes and raises the possibility that stars dominate the ionizing output.

Core claim

The incident ionizing spectra of Little Red Dots resemble those of massive stars. The low HeII/H-beta ratio near 10 to the minus 2, far below the local AGN median, combined with high H-alpha equivalent widths that exceed what standard AGN disks can produce, requires a soft spectrum rich in H-ionizing photons but poor in harder ones.

What carries the argument

HeII lambda 4686 as an optically thin tracer of the incident spectrum in dense gas envelopes where hydrogen recombination lines become optically thick and lose diagnostic power.

If this is right

  • Standard AGN accretion-disk spectra are ruled out by Cloudy photoionization models for the observed line ratios.
  • Viable alternatives are a cold accretion disk or a mix of AGN and massive stars.
  • The high densities needed for the observed lines also favor star formation, consistent with nuclear star clusters around local massive black holes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If stars supply most of the ionizing photons, LRDs may mark an early phase where nuclear star formation and black-hole growth occur together.
  • Deep UV spectroscopy could test whether the continuum itself is as soft as the lines imply.
  • Models of early galaxy feedback would need to account for softer radiation fields than assumed in pure-AGN scenarios.

Load-bearing premise

That the measured recombination lines, especially HeII, directly reflect the shape of the central engine's ionizing spectrum rather than being shaped mainly by the density and optical depth of surrounding gas or dust.

What would settle it

A measured HeII/H-beta ratio approaching the local AGN median, or a direct detection of a hard UV continuum slope, would show that the ionizing spectrum is not soft.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.18358 by Anna de Graaff, Bingjie Wang, Erica J. Nelson, Harley Katz, Ian McConachie, Ivo Labb\'e, Jenny E. Greene, Joel Leja, Jorryt Matthee, Kohei Inayoshi, Nikko J. Cleri, Pieter van Dokkum, Raphael E. Hviding, Rohan P. Naidu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Stacked Prism spectrum of LRDs, zoomed in to the spectral region around the He ii and Hβ lines. The stack is from a uniformly selected sample of LRDs from RUBIES (R. E. Hviding et al. 2025), providing complementary infor￾mation for LRDs as a population. The RUBIES program is designed with an exposure time of 48 minutes for both the Prism/Clear and the G395M/F290LP modes. All spectra are reduced with msaexp… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Zoom-in around the He ii region. The Prism and the medium-resolution spectra of RUBIES-EGS-49140 from PID 4106 are shown in black and gray, respectively. Modeled line profile (a narrow + a broad Gaussian component) and the local continuum used are over-plotted in red. The uncertainties in the measured He ii EW may arise from the unknown kinematics as well as ambiguity in the local continuum. Nevertheless, … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison between the spectra of typical AGNs and LRDs. (Left) A broken power-law fit (black) to the SDSS quasar composite spectrum (gray) is taken to be the fiducial AGN template (D. E. Vanden Berk et al. 2001). Two example LRD spectra from B. Wang et al. (2024, 2025) are shown in red for comparison. (Right) The histogram shows the distribution of optical continuum slopes measured for the RUBIES LRD samp… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Relationship between intrinsic ionizing spectrum and recombination lines. (a) The predicted Hα and He ii EWs are plotted as functions of power-law slopes when the input SEDs are all described by single power laws. Example spectra, normalized by the number of hydrogen-ionizing photons, Qion, are plotted in the first panel in the same color codes. A large line EW corresponds to a steeper power law. (b) Simil… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: He ii-based diagnostic for AGNs. SDSS AGNs are shown as blue points. The median He ii/Hβ ratio of 10−0.7 is indicated by a horizontal blue line, with the ∼ 0.3 dex 1σ scatter shaded in blue. For RUBIES-EGS-49140, this He ii/Hβ line ratio measured using a narrow Gaussian model for He ii is shown as a red unfilled triangle, while the mea￾surement including an additional broad He ii component is shown as a re… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: He ii/Hβ flux ratio as a function of number density of neutral hydrogen for two sets of Cloudy models: (a) fiducial AGN template with varying optical continuum slope, βopt; (b) AGN-stellar composite models with various levels of AGN contributions to the ionization photon budget, fAGN. The patches show violin plots with symmetrical axes, representing the distributions of the line ratios marginalized over al… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Origins of emission line fluxes. (a) The net transmitted spectra are shown at various cloud radii, from the core in blue (r/rcloud = 0) to the outer edge in red (r/rcloud = 1). (b) Hydrogen line fluxes normalized by the emergent line flux as a function of cloud radii. (c) Helium line fluxes normalized by the emergent line flux as a function of cloud radii. In all panels, the values shown at each radius cor… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Recombination line flues per ionizing photon, from incident SEDs assuming the fiducial AGN template with varying ionizing spectral slops, αion. (a) The distributions of Hα flux per hydrogen-ionizing photon Qion exhibit wide spreads, suggesting that Hα gets processed in the dense gas, and thus the expected physical relationship between the line flux and ionizing photons vanishes. (b) He ii flux per helium-i… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Observers measure EWs, which introduces a potential dependence on the shape of the continuum. (a) Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Various physical scenarios and comparisons to the observed features of RUBIES-EGS-49140. From left to right, we show the results from four model sets: dust-free fiducial AGN template with the ionization spectral slope varying within the expected range of typical AGNs, dust-free AGN template with the hardest ionizing spectrum with varying optical continuum slopes, same as the fiducial AGN model but attenua… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The nature of Little Red Dots (LRDs) has largely been investigated through their continuum emission, with lines assumed to arise from a broad-line region. In this paper, we instead use recombination lines to infer the intrinsic properties of the central engine. Our analysis first reveals a tension between the ionizing properties implied from H$\alpha$ and HeII$\,\lambda$4686. The high H$\alpha$ EWs require copious H-ionizing photons, more than the bluest AGN ionizing spectra can provide. In contrast, HeII emission is marginally detected, and its low EW is, at most, consistent with the softest AGN spectra. The low HeII/H$\beta$ ($\sim10^{-2}$, $<20\times$ local AGN median) further points to an unusually soft ionizing spectrum. We extend our analysis to dense gas envelopes (``quasi-star''/``black-hole star''), and find that hydrogen recombination lines become optically thick and lose diagnostic power, but HeII remains optically thin and a robust tracer. Photoionization modeling with Cloudy rules out standard AGN accretion disk spectra. Alternative explanations include: exotic AGN with red rest-optical emission; high average optical depth ($>10$) from gas/dust; and/or soft ionizing spectra with abundant H-ionizing photons, consistent with e.g., a cold accretion disk or a composite of AGN and stars. The latter is an intriguing scenario since high hydrogen densities are highly conducive for star formation, and nuclear star clusters are found in the vicinity of local massive black holes. While previous studies have mostly focused on features dominated by the absorbing hydrogen cloud, the HeII-based diagnostic proposed here represents a crucial step toward understanding the central engine of LRDs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that the incident ionizing spectra of Little Red Dots (LRDs) resemble those of massive stars rather than standard AGN accretion disks. This is inferred from the tension between high Hα equivalent widths (requiring abundant H-ionizing photons beyond what the bluest AGN spectra provide) and the low, marginally detected HeII λ4686 emission with HeII/Hβ ratios of ~10^{-2} (less than 20 times the local AGN median). The authors extend the analysis to dense gas envelopes (quasi-stars), arguing that H recombination lines become optically thick while HeII remains thin and thus diagnostic of the incident spectrum; Cloudy photoionization modeling is used to rule out standard AGN spectra, with alternatives including exotic AGN, high optical depth (>10), or soft spectra from cold disks or AGN+star composites.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work would advance understanding of LRDs by providing a HeII-based diagnostic for the central engine that is less affected by the surrounding gas than hydrogen lines. The identification of the Hα–HeII tension and the application of Cloudy modeling to exclude standard AGN spectra are clear strengths, as is the suggestion that high densities favor nuclear star formation and a composite scenario. This could influence interpretations of black-hole growth at high redshift if the optical-depth assumptions are verified.

major comments (2)
  1. [dense gas envelopes analysis] In the extension to dense gas envelopes (abstract and associated analysis): the assertion that HeII remains optically thin (while H lines become thick) under LRD-relevant envelope conditions is load-bearing for interpreting the low HeII/Hβ ratio as evidence of a soft incident spectrum rather than radiative-transfer effects. No explicit optical-depth calculations (e.g., for density, column, or covering fraction) are provided to confirm τ_HeII < 1 specifically for LRD parameters; without this, the diagnostic power of HeII is not demonstrated to be robust against the skeptic concern.
  2. [Cloudy modeling] Cloudy photoionization modeling section: the exact grid parameters, input spectra, and quantitative thresholds used to rule out standard AGN accretion-disk spectra are not specified (e.g., no table of model outputs or comparison metrics). This limits assessment of how definitively the modeling excludes hard spectra and supports the stellar-like conclusion.
minor comments (2)
  1. Inclusion of full data tables listing individual line measurements, equivalent widths, error bars, and adopted Cloudy parameters would improve reproducibility and allow readers to evaluate the quantitative support for the claimed tension and exclusions.
  2. Notation for line ratios (e.g., HeII/Hβ) and equivalent widths should be defined consistently on first use and cross-checked against any figures or tables for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and insightful comments, which have helped clarify several aspects of our analysis. We address each major comment in detail below and outline the revisions we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [dense gas envelopes analysis] In the extension to dense gas envelopes (abstract and associated analysis): the assertion that HeII remains optically thin (while H lines become thick) under LRD-relevant envelope conditions is load-bearing for interpreting the low HeII/Hβ ratio as evidence of a soft incident spectrum rather than radiative-transfer effects. No explicit optical-depth calculations (e.g., for density, column, or covering fraction) are provided to confirm τ_HeII < 1 specifically for LRD parameters; without this, the diagnostic power of HeII is not demonstrated to be robust against the skeptic concern.

    Authors: We agree that explicit optical-depth calculations would make the argument more robust and directly address potential radiative-transfer concerns. In the current manuscript we rely on the large difference in ionization potentials and abundances between H and He to argue that HeII remains thin at the high densities and columns inferred for LRD envelopes, while H lines become thick. To strengthen this, we will add a dedicated subsection with quantitative τ calculations using LRD-typical parameters (n_H ~ 10^8–10^10 cm^{-3}, N_H ~ 10^{23}–10^{25} cm^{-2}, and covering fractions consistent with the observed EWs). These will explicitly show τ_HeII ≪ 1 while τ_Hα, τ_Hβ > 1, confirming HeII as a reliable tracer of the incident spectrum. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Cloudy modeling] Cloudy photoionization modeling section: the exact grid parameters, input spectra, and quantitative thresholds used to rule out standard AGN accretion-disk spectra are not specified (e.g., no table of model outputs or comparison metrics). This limits assessment of how definitively the modeling excludes hard spectra and supports the stellar-like conclusion.

    Authors: We acknowledge that greater transparency in the modeling details is needed. The manuscript currently describes the overall setup and key conclusions from the Cloudy grids, but does not tabulate the full parameter ranges or output metrics. In the revised version we will include a table (or appendix) listing the explored grid (density, ionization parameter, metallicity, and input SEDs including standard AGN disk models and stellar atmospheres), together with predicted HeII/Hβ and Hα EW values for each case. This will allow readers to see the quantitative thresholds at which standard AGN spectra are excluded relative to the observed LRD line ratios. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation grounded in external models and observed ratios

full rationale

The paper infers soft incident ionizing spectra for LRDs from measured high Hα EWs (requiring abundant H-ionizing photons) and low HeII/Hβ ratios (~10^{-2}), using standard Cloudy photoionization grids to rule out typical AGN accretion disk spectra. Analysis of dense quasi-star envelopes models that H recombination lines become optically thick while HeII remains thin, but this is presented as an extension of external radiative transfer considerations rather than a self-defined fit or parameter tuned to force the target conclusion. No self-citation load-bearing steps, ansatzes smuggled via prior work, or renaming of known results appear; the chain compares independent data to external benchmarks and remains self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard photoionization assumptions and the optical-depth contrast between H and HeII lines in dense envelopes; no new free parameters are explicitly fitted in the abstract, but alternatives invoke high optical depth.

free parameters (1)
  • average optical depth
    Invoked as >10 in alternative explanations for missing hard photons; value chosen to suppress hard photons while preserving H-ionizing flux.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption HeII lambda 4686 remains optically thin even in dense gas envelopes where hydrogen recombination lines become thick
    Stated explicitly when extending analysis to quasi-star/black-hole star models.
  • domain assumption Recombination lines trace the incident ionizing spectrum from the central engine
    Core premise of the diagnostic approach contrasting with prior continuum studies.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5913 in / 1411 out tokens · 42580 ms · 2026-05-18T21:00:18.860087+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The GlimmIr: Spectroscopic Variability in a z~7 LRD Indicates Rapid Changes in Both the Narrow and Broad Line Regions

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    First spectroscopic variability in a z~7 LRD shows rapid changes in both narrow and broad line regions, implying direct ionization from the central source to surrounding nebular gas.

  2. (LRDs)$^2$: The Low-ReDshift Little Red Dots Survey. II. DESI DR1 Sample

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The survey identifies 27 low-redshift LRDs with compact morphology, V-shaped continua, broad Balmer lines with extreme decrements, and ubiquitous outflows, matching high-z counterparts and yielding a number density lo...

  3. A new sample of Little Red Dots at $z<0.45$ in DESI DR1: Broad Balmer lines, low ionization spectrum and no variability

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    Eight low-redshift Little Red Dots identified in DESI DR1 exhibit broad Balmer lines, steep decrements, compact shapes, and negligible variability, with a number density roughly 10,000 times lower than at z>4.

  4. GLIMPSED: Direct evidence for a fast AGN-driven outflow from a z=6.64 Little Red Dot host galaxy

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A z=6.64 LRD host galaxy exhibits a fast AGN-driven outflow with 5500 km/s velocities, dusty gas, and low metallicity, confirming AGN presence in these systems.

  5. Spectral Appearance of Self-gravitating Disks Powered by Stellar Objects: Universal Effective Temperature in the Optical Continuum and Application to Little Red Dots

    astro-ph.HE 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Self-gravitating disks heated by stars reach a universal optical effective temperature of 4000-4500 K independent of accretion rate, black hole mass, and viscosity, explaining Little Red Dots.

  6. A Magnetized Black Hole Envelope Model for Little Red Dots

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A theoretical model of a magnetized black hole envelope is developed to explain the broad emission lines and X-ray faintness observed in little red dots using co-rotating plasma clumps and limited X-ray sources.

  7. Spectral Uniformity of Little Red Dots: A Natural Outcome of Coevolving Seed Black Holes and Nascent Starbursts

    astro-ph.GA 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Coevolving super-Eddington black holes and nuclear starbursts in high-redshift halos naturally generate the V-shaped UV-to-optical spectra and weak high-energy emission of little red dots.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

131 extracted references · 131 canonical work pages · cited by 7 Pith papers · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    B., Casey, C

    Akins, H. B., Casey, C. M., Lambrides, E., et al. 2025a, ApJ, 991, 37, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade984

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade984

  2. [2]

    B., Casey, C

    Akins, H. B., Casey, C. M., Berg, D. A., et al. 2025b, ApJL, 980, L29, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adab76

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adab76 2041

  3. [3]

    B., Casey, C

    Akins, H. B., Casey, C. M., Chisholm, J., et al. 2026, ApJ, 997, 218, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae2c77

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2c77 2026

  4. [4]

    T., Bogd´ an,´A., Kov´ acs, O

    Ananna, T. T., Bogd´ an,´A., Kov´ acs, O. E., Natarajan, P., & Hickox, R. C. 2024, ApJL, 969, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669 2024

  5. [5]

    2016, MNRAS, 456, 1424, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2758

    Aret, A., Kraus, M., & ˇSlechta, M. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 1424, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2758

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2758 2016

  6. [6]

    Origins of the UV continuum and Balmer emission lines in Little Red Dots: observational validation of dense gas envelope models enshrouding the AGN

    Asada, Y., Inayoshi, K., Fei, Q., Fujimoto, S., & Willott, C. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.10573, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.10573 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Missing Ionizing Photons of LRDs25 T able A.1.Notable LRDs IDz spec JWST PID Reference for spectral mode...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.10573 2026

  7. [7]

    Baggen, J. F. W., van Dokkum, P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, ApJL, 977, L13, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad90b8

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad90b8 2024

  8. [8]

    A., Phillips M

    Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M., & Terlevich, R. 1981, PASP, 93, 5, doi: 10.1086/130766

    work page doi:10.1086/130766 1981

  9. [9]

    L., et al., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/308056 , 527, 54

    Balogh, M. L., Morris, S. L., Yee, H. K. C., Carlberg, R. G., & Ellingson, E. 1999, ApJ, 527, 54, doi: 10.1086/308056 B¨ ar, R. E., Weigel, A. K., Sartori, L. F., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 2879, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3283

    work page doi:10.1086/308056 1999

  10. [10]

    2010, ApJ, 708, 834, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/708/1/834

    Bartko, H., Martins, F., Trippe, S., et al. 2010, ApJ, 708, 834, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/708/1/834

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/708/1/834 2010

  11. [11]

    C., & Dexter, J

    Begelman, M. C., & Dexter, J. 2026, ApJ, 996, 48, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae274a 28Wang et al

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae274a 2026

  12. [12]

    C., Rossi, E

    Begelman, M. C., Rossi, E. M., & Armitage, P. J. 2008, MNRAS, 387, 1649, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13344.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13344.x 2008

  13. [13]

    2025, ApJL, 984, L55, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adce6c

    Bellovary, J. 2025, ApJL, 984, L55, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adce6c

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adce6c 2025

  14. [14]

    Stress testing ΛCDM with high -redshift galaxy candidates

    Boylan-Kolchin, M. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 731, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-01937-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-023-01937-7 2023

  15. [15]

    2023,, 0.6.17 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7299500

    Brammer, G. 2023,, 0.6.17 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7299500

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.7299500 2023

  16. [16]

    2025, MNRAS, 544, L167, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slaf116

    Brazzini, M., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 544, L167, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slaf116

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaf116 2025

  17. [17]

    2003, The Astrophysical Journal, 596, 34, doi: 10.1086/377529

    Bromm, V., & Loeb, A. 2003, ApJ, 596, 34, doi: 10.1086/377529

    work page doi:10.1086/377529 2003

  18. [18]

    2003, MNRAS, 339, 937, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06241.x G¨ otberg, Y., de Mink, S

    Bruzual, G., & Charlot, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x Bruzual A., G. 1983, ApJ, 273, 105, doi: 10.1086/161352

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x 2003

  19. [19]

    R., & Hillier, D

    Busche, J. R., & Hillier, D. J. 2005, AJ, 129, 454, doi: 10.1086/426362

    work page doi:10.1086/426362 2005

  20. [20]

    , keywords =

    Cameron, A. J., Saxena, A., Bunker, A. J., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A115, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346107

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346107 2023

  21. [21]

    M., Akins, H

    Casey, C. M., Akins, H. B., Finkelstein, S. L., et al. 2025, ApJL, 990, L61, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adfa91

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adfa91 2025

  22. [22]

    , keywords =

    Cenci, E., & Habouzit, M. 2025, MNRAS, 542, 2597, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1362

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1362 2025

  23. [23]

    2003, PASP, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392

    Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392

    work page Pith review doi:10.1086/376392 2003

  24. [24]

    2026, MNRAS, 545, staf2131, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf2131

    Chang, S.-J., Gronke, M., Matthee, J., & Mason, C. 2026, MNRAS, 545, staf2131, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf2131

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf2131 2026

  25. [25]

    2023, RMxAA, 59, 327, doi: 10.22201/ia.01851101p.2023.59.02.12 9

    Chatzikos, M., Bianchi, S., Camilloni, F., et al. 2023, RMxAA, 59, 327, doi: 10.22201/ia.01851101p.2023.59.02.12

    work page doi:10.22201/ia.01851101p.2023.59.02.12 2023

  26. [26]

    C., Li, R., & Zhuang, M.-Y

    Chen, C.-H., Ho, L. C., Li, R., & Zhuang, M.-Y. 2025, ApJ, 983, 60, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada93a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada93a 2025

  27. [27]

    2017, ApJ, 838, 159, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa679f

    Choi, J., Conroy, C., & Byler, N. 2017, ApJ, 838, 159, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa679f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa679f 2017

  28. [28]

    The Astrophysical Journal , year =

    Choi, J., Dotter, A., Conroy, C., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, 102, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.3847/0004-637x/823/2/102 2016

  29. [29]

    J., Olivier, G

    Cleri, N. J., Olivier, G. M., Backhaus, B. E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 994, 146, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0f17

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae0f17 2025

  30. [30]

    Conroy, C., & Gunn, J. E. 2010, ApJ, 712, 833, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/833

    work page Pith review doi:10.1088/0004-637x/712/2/833 2010

  31. [31]

    W., & Laor, A

    Davis, S. W., & Laor, A. 2011, ApJ, 728, 98, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/728/2/98 de Graaff, A., Rix, H.-W., Carniani, S., et al. 2024, A&A, 684, A87, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347755 de Graaff, A., Rix, H.-W., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025a, A&A, 701, A168, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554681 de Graaff, A., Brammer, G., Weibel, A., et al. 2025b, A&A, 697, A189, doi:...

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/728/2/98 2011

  32. [32]

    MESA Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST) 0: Methods for the construction of stellar isochrones

    Dotter, A. 2016, ApJS, 222, 8, doi: 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8

    work page Pith review doi:10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8 2016

  33. [33]

    J., Stanway , E

    Eldridge, J. J., Stanway, E. R., Xiao, L., et al. 2017, PASA, 34, e058, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2017.51

    work page Pith review doi:10.1017/pasa.2017.51 2017

  34. [34]

    2016, MNRAS, 456, 3354, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2794

    Feltre, A., Charlot, S., & Gutkin, J. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 3354, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2794

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2794 2016

  35. [35]

    Ferland, G. J. 2006, Hazy, A Brief Introduction to Cloudy 06.02

    work page 2006

  36. [36]

    J., Done, C., Jin, C., Landt, H., & Ward, M

    Ferland, G. J., Done, C., Jin, C., Landt, H., & Ward, M. J. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 5917, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1207

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1207 2020

  37. [37]

    J., Netzer H., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1086/160577 , 264, 105

    Ferland, G. J., & Netzer, H. 1983, ApJ, 264, 105, doi: 10.1086/160577

    work page doi:10.1086/160577 1983

  38. [38]

    J., Chatzikos, M., Guzm´ an, F., et al

    Ferland, G. J., Chatzikos, M., Guzm´ an, F., et al. 2017, RMxAA, 53, 385, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1705.10877

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.10877 2017

  39. [39]

    2014, MNRAS, 443, 2410, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1280

    Ferrara, A., Salvadori, S., Yue, B., & Schleicher, D. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 2410, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1280

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1280 2014

  40. [40]

    J., Labb´ e, I., Zitrin, A., et al

    Furtak, L. J., Labb´ e, I., Zitrin, A., et al. 2024, Nature, 628, 57, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07184-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07184-8 2024

  41. [41]

    J., Secunda, A

    Furtak, L. J., Secunda, A. R., Greene, J. E., et al. 2025, A&A, 698, A227, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554110

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554110 2025

  42. [42]

    E., Mendoza, C., & Zeippen, C

    Galavis, M. E., Mendoza, C., & Zeippen, C. J. 1997, A&AS, 123, 159, doi: 10.1051/aas:1997344

    work page doi:10.1051/aas:1997344 1997

  43. [43]

    2010, Reviews of Modern Physics, 82, 3121, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.3121 Gravity Collaboration, Abuter, R., Amorim, A., et al

    Genzel, R., Eisenhauer, F., & Gillessen, S. 2010, Reviews of Modern Physics, 82, 3121, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.3121

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.3121 2010

  44. [44]

    2019, MNRAS, 482, 321, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2514

    Glatzle, M., Ciardi, B., & Graziani, L. 2019, MNRAS, 482, 321, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2514

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2514 2019

  45. [45]

    J., & White, R

    Glikman, E., Helfand, D. J., & White, R. L. 2006, ApJ, 640, 579, doi: 10.1086/500098 Gonz´ alez-D´ ıaz, R., V´ ılchez, J. M., Kehrig, C., del

    work page doi:10.1086/500098 2006

  46. [46]

    2025, A&A, 702, A3, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555935

    Moral-Castro, I., & Iglesias-P´ aramo, J. 2025, A&A, 702, A3, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555935

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555935 2025

  47. [47]

    2003, MNRAS, 339, 937, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06241.x G¨ otberg, Y., de Mink, S

    Goodman, J. 2003, MNRAS, 339, 937, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06241.x G¨ otberg, Y., de Mink, S. E., Groh, J. H., et al. 2018, A&A, 615, A78, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201732274

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06241.x 2003

  48. [48]

    D., Greene, J

    Goulding, A. D., Greene, J. E., Setton, D. J., et al. 2023, ApJL, 955, L24, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acf7c5

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acf7c5 2023

  49. [49]

    E., & Ho, L

    Greene, J. E., & Ho, L. C. 2005, ApJ, 630, 122, doi: 10.1086/431897

    work page Pith review doi:10.1086/431897 2005

  50. [50]

    , keywords =

    Greene, J. E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f 2024

  51. [51]

    A., Heckman, T

    Groves, B. A., Heckman, T. M., & Kauffmann, G. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 1559, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10812.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10812.x 2006

  52. [52]

    R., Gr \"a fener G., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20031308 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A&A...410..993H 410, 993

    Hamann, W. R., & Gr¨ afener, G. 2003, A&A, 410, 993, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20031308

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031308 2003

  53. [53]

    1985, ApJ, 297, 371, doi: 10.1086/163537 Missing Ionizing Photons of LRDs29

    Hamilton, D. 1985, ApJ, 297, 371, doi: 10.1086/163537 Missing Ionizing Photons of LRDs29

    work page doi:10.1086/163537 1985

  54. [54]

    Harris, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020

  55. [55]

    J., Miller D

    Hillier, D. J., & Miller, D. L. 1998, ApJ, 496, 407, doi: 10.1086/305350

    work page doi:10.1086/305350 1998

  56. [56]

    Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Results

    Hinshaw, G., Larson, D., Komatsu, E., et al. 2013, ApJS, 208, 19, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19

    work page Pith review doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19 2013

  57. [57]

    1995, ApJ, 439, 875, doi: 10.1086/175226

    Hubeny, I., & Lanz, T. 1995, ApJ, 439, 875, doi: 10.1086/175226

    work page doi:10.1086/175226 1995

  58. [58]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  59. [59]

    , keywords =

    Hviding, R. E., de Graaff, A., Miller, T. B., et al. 2025, A&A, 702, A57, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555816

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555816 2025

  60. [60]

    , keywords =

    Inayoshi, K., Kimura, S. S., & Noda, H. 2025a, PASJ, 77, 811, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psaf050

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psaf050

  61. [61]

    2025, ApJL, 980, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd

    Inayoshi, K., & Maiolino, R. 2025, ApJL, 980, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd 2025

  62. [62]

    The Emergence of Little Red Dots from Binary Massive Black Holes

    Haiman, Z. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.05322, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.05322

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.05322

  63. [63]

    2020, ARA&A, 58, 27, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-120419-014455

    Inayoshi, K., Visbal, E., & Haiman, Z. 2020, ARA&A, 58, 27, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-120419-014455

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-120419-014455 2020

  64. [64]

    , keywords =

    Jeon, J., Liu, B., Bromm, V., et al. 2026, ApJ, 998, 148, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae3725

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae3725 2026

  65. [65]

    , keywords =

    Ji, X., Maiolino, R., ¨Ubler, H., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 3900, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1867

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1867 2025

  66. [66]

    2026, MNRAS, 545, staf2235, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf2235

    Ji, X., D’Eugenio, F., Juodˇ zbalis, I., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 545, staf2235, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf2235

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf2235 2026

  67. [67]

    2012, MNRAS, 420, 1825, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19805.x

    Jin, C., Ward, M., Done, C., & Gelbord, J. 2012, MNRAS, 420, 1825, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19805.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19805.x 2012

  68. [68]

    L., Whalen, D

    Johnson, J. L., Whalen, D. J., Fryer, C. L., & Li, H. 2012, ApJ, 750, 66, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/750/1/66 Juodˇ zbalis, I., Maiolino, R., Baker, W. M., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 546, stag086, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stag086

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/750/1/66 2012

  69. [69]

    M., Guerrero, M

    Kehrig, C., V´ ılchez, J. M., Guerrero, M. A., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 1081, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1920

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1920 2018

  70. [70]

    , keywords =

    Kewley, L. J., Nicholls, D. C., & Sutherland, R. S. 2019, ARA&A, 57, 511, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051832

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051832 2019

  71. [71]

    Kido, D., Ioka, K., Hotokezaka, K., Inayoshi, K., & Irwin, C. M. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 3407, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1898

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1898 2025

  72. [72]

    , keywords =

    Killi, M., Watson, D., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A52, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348857

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348857 2024

  73. [73]

    , keywords =

    Kocevski, D. D., Finkelstein, S. L., Barro, G., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 126, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adbc7d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adbc7d 2025

  74. [74]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Kokorev, V., Chisholm, J., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.07515, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.07515 Kovaˇ cevi´ c-Dojˇ cinovi´ c, J., Dojˇ cinovi´ c, I., Laki´ cevi´ c, M., & Popovi´ c, L.ˇC. 2025, A&A, 694, A289, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450516 Labb´ e, I., van Dokkum, P., Nelson, E., et al. 2023, Nature, 616, 266, doi: 10.1038/s41586...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.07515 2025

  75. [75]

    E., Matthee, J., et al

    Labbe, I., Greene, J. E., Matthee, J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.04557, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.04557

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.04557 2024

  76. [76]

    The case for super-Eddington accretion in JWST broad-line AGN during the first billion years

    Lambrides, E., Garofali, K., Larson, R., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.13047, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.13047

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.13047 2024

  77. [77]

    , keywords =

    Lanz, T., & Hubeny, I. 2003, ApJS, 146, 417, doi: 10.1086/374373

    work page doi:10.1086/374373 2003

  78. [78]

    Laor, A., & Davis, S. W. 2014, MNRAS, 438, 3024, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2408

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt2408 2014

  79. [79]

    D., et al

    Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J. D., et al. 1999, ApJS, 123, 3, doi: 10.1086/313233

    work page Pith review doi:10.1086/313233 1999

  80. [80]

    , keywords =

    Li, Y., Leja, J., Johnson, B. D., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adcab4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adcab4 2025

Showing first 80 references.