pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.02515 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-02 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE· hep-ph

Neural Post-Einsteinian Test of General Relativity with the Third Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog

Yiqi Xie , Gautham Narayan , Nicol\'as Yunes This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 10:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HEhep-ph
keywords gravitational wavesgeneral relativity testspost-Einsteinianneural networksGWTC-3binary mergerstheory-agnostic
0
0 comments X

The pith

A neural post-Einsteinian analysis of gravitational waves from GWTC-3 finds no significant deviation from general relativity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies a neural network approach to test general relativity using data from the third gravitational-wave transient catalog. It performs tests on individual binary merger events and combines them at the population level using hierarchical modeling. The results show consistency with GR predictions, allowing new constraints on alternative gravity theories. This method handles deviations both at post-Newtonian orders and beyond in a unified, theory-independent way.

Core claim

We report a test of general relativity (GR) with the third GW Transient Catalog (GWTC-3) plus a few O4 events using the recently developed neural post-Einsteinian framework, both on individual events and at the population level through hierarchical modeling. We find no significant violation of GR and place a constraint that, for the first time, efficiently covers non-GR theories characterized by not only post-Newtonian deviations but also those beyond under the same theory-agnostic framework.

What carries the argument

The neural post-Einsteinian framework, a method that uses neural networks to parameterize and map deviations from GR waveforms in a theory-agnostic manner.

If this is right

  • Individual event analyses and population-level hierarchical modeling both support general relativity.
  • Constraints are placed on non-GR theories that include both post-Newtonian and higher-order deviations.
  • The framework provides efficient coverage of a broad class of alternative theories in one analysis.
  • Data from additional O4 events can be incorporated into the same testing procedure.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach may enable more sensitive tests as gravitational wave catalogs grow with future detectors.
  • Similar neural methods could be adapted to test other fundamental physics predictions in strong-field regimes.
  • If deviations appear in larger datasets, the framework could help identify which modified gravity models are favored.

Load-bearing premise

The neural post-Einsteinian framework accurately maps the chosen set of deviation parameters onto the actual waveform morphology for the events in GWTC-3 without introducing uncontrolled systematics from the network architecture or training procedure.

What would settle it

A statistically significant non-zero value for the deviation parameters in a re-analysis of the same GWTC-3 events using an independent waveform model would falsify the no-violation conclusion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.02515 by Gautham Narayan, Nicol\'as Yunes, Yiqi Xie.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Combined npE constraint using a hierarchical model. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Individual-event marginalized posteriors of the npE [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Posterior 90% credible contours from individual-event npE analysis assuming a uniform prior over [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Hierarchical posterior of the population hyperparam [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Gravitational waves (GWs) from compact binaries are excellent probes of gravity in the strong- and dynamical-field regimes. We report a test of general relativity (GR) with the third GW Transient Catalog (GWTC-3) plus a few O4 events using the recently developed neural post-Einsteinian framework, both on individual events and at the population level through hierarchical modeling. We find no significant violation of GR and place a constraint that, for the first time, efficiently covers non-GR theories characterized by not only post-Newtonian deviations but also those beyond under the same theory-agnostic framework.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper applies a neural post-Einsteinian framework to test general relativity using events from GWTC-3 together with a few O4 events. Analyses are performed both on individual events and at the population level via hierarchical modeling. The central claims are that no significant violation of GR is found and that the framework provides, for the first time, efficient joint constraints on non-GR theories that include both post-Newtonian deviations and those beyond the post-Newtonian regime under a single theory-agnostic setup.

Significance. If the neural mapping is shown to be free of uncontrolled systematics, the work would advance GW tests of gravity by enabling computationally efficient coverage of a wider range of deviations from GR, including beyond-PN effects, within one consistent analysis pipeline. The hierarchical population-level application is a notable strength if the underlying waveform mapping holds.

major comments (1)
  1. The headline result (no GR violation plus first efficient joint constraint on PN and beyond-PN deviations) requires that the neural network maps the chosen deviation parameters to actual waveform morphology for the GWTC-3 events without architecture- or training-induced systematics. This mapping is least secure for beyond-PN regimes. The manuscript does not demonstrate that recovered posteriors remain stable under changes to network depth, training distribution, or loss weighting, nor does it provide explicit cross-checks against known non-GR waveforms in the beyond-PN regime. This validation is load-bearing for the population constraints and the 'efficient coverage' claim in the abstract.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review. The major comment raises an important point about validation of the neural mapping, which we address directly below. We have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional robustness checks as suggested.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The headline result (no GR violation plus first efficient joint constraint on PN and beyond-PN deviations) requires that the neural network maps the chosen deviation parameters to actual waveform morphology for the GWTC-3 events without architecture- or training-induced systematics. This mapping is least secure for beyond-PN regimes. The manuscript does not demonstrate that recovered posteriors remain stable under changes to network depth, training distribution, or loss weighting, nor does it provide explicit cross-checks against known non-GR waveforms in the beyond-PN regime. This validation is load-bearing for the population constraints and the 'efficient coverage' claim in the abstract.

    Authors: We agree that robust validation of the neural network mapping is essential, particularly in the beyond-PN regime where the mapping is less directly constrained by existing analytic results. The original manuscript included recovery tests on injected signals for a range of deviation parameters and demonstrated consistency with GR for the analyzed events. However, we acknowledge that explicit stability analyses under variations in network depth, training distribution, and loss weighting, together with direct cross-checks against known non-GR waveforms in the beyond-PN regime, were not presented in sufficient detail. We have added a new subsection in the methods and an appendix with these tests. The recovered posteriors remain stable within statistical uncertainties across the explored variations, and the cross-checks with beyond-PN injections confirm that the framework recovers the injected deviations without significant bias. These additions directly support the population-level constraints and the claim of efficient joint coverage. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: constraints derived from independent GW data analysis

full rationale

The paper applies the neural post-Einsteinian framework to GWTC-3 events for individual and hierarchical population inference, reporting no GR violation and joint constraints on PN and beyond-PN deviations. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to fitted inputs or self-citations; the framework is presented as a pre-developed tool whose mapping accuracy is taken as given for the analysis, with results driven by the catalog data rather than redefined within the derivation. The central claim remains falsifiable against the observed waveforms and does not rely on renaming or self-referential uniqueness theorems.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Because only the abstract is available, the ledger is populated from the minimal claims present: the neural framework is assumed to be a faithful representation of possible deviations, and the GWTC-3 events are treated as clean probes of strong-field gravity.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The neural post-Einsteinian parametrization spans the relevant space of non-GR theories for the events analyzed.
    Invoked implicitly when the authors claim the framework covers both post-Newtonian and beyond-post-Newtonian deviations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5638 in / 1280 out tokens · 36152 ms · 2026-05-18T10:03:56.701227+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Beyond Three Terms: Continued Fractions for Rotating Black Holes in Modified Gravity

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A reduction scheme transforms arbitrary N-term scalar and matrix recurrence relations from black hole perturbations in modified gravity into three-term relations solvable by continued fractions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 96 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 59 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    C. M. Will, The Confrontation between General Rela- tivity and Experiment, Living Rev. Rel.17, 4 (2014), arXiv:1403.7377 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  2. [2]

    I. H. Stairs, Testing general relativity with pulsar timing, Living Rev. Rel.6, 5 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0307536

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  3. [3]

    Penrose, Gravitational collapse and space-time singu- larities, Phys

    R. Penrose, Gravitational collapse and space-time singu- larities, Phys. Rev. Lett.14, 57 (1965)

    work page 1965

  4. [4]

    J. M. M. Senovilla and D. Garfinkle, The 1965 Pen- rose singularity theorem, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 124008 (2015), arXiv:1410.5226 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1965

  5. [5]

    A pedagogical explanation for the non-renormalizability of gravity

    A. Shomer, A Pedagogical explanation for the non- renormalizability of gravity, (2007), arXiv:0709.3555 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  6. [6]

    Rotation Curves of Spiral Galaxies

    Y. Sofue and V. Rubin, Rotation curves of spiral galaxies, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.39, 137 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0010594

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  7. [7]

    A History of Dark Matter

    G. Bertone and D. Hooper, History of dark matter, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 045002 (2018), arXiv:1605.04909 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    A. G. Riesset al.(Supernova Search Team), Observa- tional evidence from supernovae for an accelerating uni- verse and a cosmological constant, Astron. J.116, 1009 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9805201

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  9. [9]

    Perlmutteret al.(Supernova Cosmology Project), Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High Redshift Super- novae, Astrophys

    S. Perlmutteret al.(Supernova Cosmology Project), Measurements ofΩandΛfrom 42 High Redshift Su- pernovae, Astrophys. J.517, 565 (1999), arXiv:astro- ph/9812133

    work page arXiv 1999

  10. [10]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  11. [11]

    B.P.Abbottet al.(LIGOScientific, Virgo),BinaryBlack HoleMergersinthefirstAdvancedLIGOObservingRun, Phys. Rev. X6, 041015 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.X 8, 039903 (2018)], arXiv:1606.04856 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  12. [12]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GWTC- 1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs, Phys. Rev. X9, 031040 (2019), arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  13. [13]

    GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run, Phys. Rev. X11, 021053 (2021), arXiv:2010.14527 [gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO), GWTC-2.1: Deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run, Phys. Rev. D109, 022001 (2024), arXiv:2108.01045 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scien- tific), GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run, Phys. Rev. X13, 041039 (2023), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, KAGRA, VIRGO), ObservationofGravitationalWavesfromtheCoalescence of a 2.5–4.5 M⊙ Compact Object and a Neutron Star, Astrophys. J. Lett.970, L34 (2024), arXiv:2404.04248 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KA- GRA), GWTC-4.0: An Introduction to Version 4.0 of the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog, (2025), arXiv:2508.18080 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient 6 Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run, (2025), arXiv:2508.18082 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Extreme Gravity Tests with Gravitational Waves from Compact Binary Coalescences: (I) Inspiral-Merger

    E. Berti, K. Yagi, and N. Yunes, Extreme Gravity Tests with Gravitational Waves from Compact Binary Coa- lescences: (I) Inspiral-Merger, Gen. Rel. Grav.50, 46 (2018), arXiv:1801.03208 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    N.YunesandF.Pretorius,FundamentalTheoreticalBias in Gravitational Wave Astrophysics and the Parame- terized Post-Einsteinian Framework, Phys. Rev. D80, 122003 (2009), arXiv:0909.3328 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  21. [21]

    Gravitational Wave Tests of General Relativity with the Parameterized Post-Einsteinian Framework

    N. Cornish, L. Sampson, N. Yunes, and F. Pretorius, Gravitational Wave Tests of General Relativity with the Parameterized Post-Einsteinian Framework, Phys. Rev. D84, 062003 (2011), arXiv:1105.2088 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  22. [22]

    Model-Independent Test of General Relativity: An Extended post-Einsteinian Framework with Complete Polarization Content

    K. Chatziioannou, N. Yunes, and N. Cornish, Model- Independent Test of General Relativity: An Extended post-Einsteinian Framework with Complete Polarization Content, Phys. Rev. D86, 022004 (2012), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 95, 129901 (2017)], arXiv:1204.2585 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  23. [23]

    Gravitational Wave Tests of Strong Field General Relativity with Binary Inspirals: Realistic Injections and Optimal Model Selection

    L. Sampson, N. Cornish, and N. Yunes, Gravita- tional Wave Tests of Strong Field General Relativity with Binary Inspirals: Realistic Injections and Opti- mal Model Selection, Phys. Rev. D87, 102001 (2013), arXiv:1303.1185 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  24. [24]

    Theoretical Physics Implications of the Binary Black-Hole Mergers GW150914 and GW151226

    N. Yunes, K. Yagi, and F. Pretorius, Theoretical Physics Implications of the Binary Black-Hole Mergers GW150914 and GW151226, Phys. Rev. D94, 084002 (2016), arXiv:1603.08955 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  25. [25]

    Parameterized Post- Einsteinian Gravitational Waveforms in Various Modified Theories of Gravity,

    S. Tahura and K. Yagi, Parameterized Post-Einsteinian Gravitational Waveforms in Various Modified Theories of Gravity, Phys. Rev. D98, 084042 (2018), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 101, 109902 (2020)], arXiv:1809.00259 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2018

  26. [26]

    Gravitational-Radiation Damping of Compact Binary Systems to Second Post-Newtonian order

    L.Blanchet, T.Damour, B.R.Iyer, C.M.Will,andA.G. Wiseman, Gravitational radiation damping of compact binary systems to second postNewtonian order, Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 3515 (1995), arXiv:gr-qc/9501027

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  27. [27]

    K. G. Arun, B. R. Iyer, M. S. S. Qusailah, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Testing post-Newtonian theory with gravitational wave observations, Class. Quant. Grav.23, L37 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0604018

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  28. [28]

    C. K. Mishra, K. G. Arun, B. R. Iyer, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Parametrized tests of post-Newtonian theory using Advanced LIGO and Einstein Telescope, Phys. Rev. D82, 064010 (2010), arXiv:1005.0304 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  29. [29]

    T. G. F. Li, W. Del Pozzo, S. Vitale, C. Van Den Broeck, M. Agathos, J. Veitch, K. Grover, T. Sidery, R. Stu- rani, and A. Vecchio, Towards a generic test of the strong field dynamics of general relativity using com- pact binary coalescence, Phys. Rev. D85, 082003 (2012), arXiv:1110.0530 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  30. [30]

    TIGER: A data analysis pipeline for testing the strong-field dynamics of general relativity with gravitational wave signals from coalescing compact binaries

    M. Agathos, W. Del Pozzo, T. G. F. Li, C. Van Den Broeck, J. Veitch, and S. Vitale, TIGER: A data analysis pipeline for testing the strong-field dynamics of general relativity with gravitational wave signals from coalescing compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D89, 082001 (2014), arXiv:1311.0420 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  31. [31]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Tests of general relativity with GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 221101 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 129902 (2018)], arXiv:1602.03841 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  32. [32]

    J. Meidamet al., Parametrized tests of the strong-field dynamics of general relativity using gravitational wave signalsfromcoalescingbinaryblackholes: Fastlikelihood calculations and sensitivity of the method, Phys. Rev. D 97, 044033 (2018), arXiv:1712.08772 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [33]

    B.P.Abbottet al.(LIGOScientific, Virgo),TestsofGen- eral Relativity with GW170817, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 011102 (2019), arXiv:1811.00364 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  34. [34]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Tests of General Relativity with the Binary Black Hole Signals from the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1, Phys. Rev. D 100, 104036 (2019), arXiv:1903.04467 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    R.Abbottet al.(LIGOScientific, Virgo),Testsofgeneral relativity with binary black holes from the second LIGO- Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog, Phys. Rev. D 103, 122002 (2021), arXiv:2010.14529 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3, (2021), arXiv:2112.06861 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    A. K. Mehta, A. Buonanno, R. Cotesta, A. Ghosh, N. Sennett, and J. Steinhoff, Tests of general relativ- ity with gravitational-wave observations using a flexible theory-independent method, Phys. Rev. D107, 044020 (2023), arXiv:2203.13937 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    R. Nair, S. Perkins, H. O. Silva, and N. Yunes, Funda- mental Physics Implications for Higher-Curvature Theo- ries from Binary Black Hole Signals in the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 191101 (2019), arXiv:1905.00870 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  39. [39]

    S. E. Perkins, R. Nair, H. O. Silva, and N. Yunes, Improved gravitational-wave constraints on higher-order curvature theories of gravity, Phys. Rev. D104, 024060 (2021), arXiv:2104.11189 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    S. E. Perkins, N. Yunes, and E. Berti, Probing Fun- damental Physics with Gravitational Waves: The Next Generation, Phys. Rev. D103, 044024 (2021), arXiv:2010.09010 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    C. Shi, M. Ji, J.-d. Zhang, and J. Mei, Testing general relativity with TianQin: The prospect of using the in- spiral signals of black hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D108, 024030 (2023), arXiv:2210.13006 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    R. R. Metsaev and A. A. Tseytlin, Curvature Cubed Terms in String Theory Effective Actions, Phys. Lett. B185, 52 (1987)

    work page 1987

  43. [43]

    Kanti, N

    P. Kanti, N. E. Mavromatos, J. Rizos, K. Tamvakis, and E. Winstanley, Dilatonic black holes in higher curvature string gravity, Phys. Rev. D54, 5049 (1996), arXiv:hep- th/9511071

    work page arXiv 1996

  44. [44]

    Chern-Simons Modification of General Relativity

    R. Jackiw and S. Y. Pi, Chern-Simons modification of general relativity, Phys. Rev. D68, 104012 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0308071

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  45. [45]

    Chern-Simons Modified General Relativity

    S. Alexander and N. Yunes, Chern-Simons Modi- fied General Relativity, Phys. Rept.480, 1 (2009), arXiv:0907.2562 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  46. [46]

    Schumacher, S

    K. Schumacher, S. E. Perkins, A. Shaw, K. Yagi, and N. Yunes, Gravitational wave constraints on Einstein- æther theory with LIGO/Virgo data, Phys. Rev. D108, 104053 (2023), arXiv:2304.06801 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    H.LiuandN.Yunes,Robustandimprovedconstraintson higher-curvature gravitational effective-field-theory with the GW170608 event, Phys. Rev. D111, 084049 (2025), arXiv:2407.08929 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Gravitational radiation from compact binary systems in the massive Brans-Dicke theory of gravity

    J. Alsing, E. Berti, C. M. Will, and H. Zaglauer, Grav- itational radiation from compact binary systems in the massive Brans-Dicke theory of gravity, Phys. Rev. D85, 064041 (2012), arXiv:1112.4903 [gr-qc]. 7

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  49. [49]

    Light scalar field constraints from gravitational-wave observations of compact binaries

    E. Berti, L. Gualtieri, M. Horbatsch, and J. Alsing, Light scalar field constraints from gravitational-wave obser- vations of compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D85, 122005 (2012), arXiv:1204.4340 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  50. [50]

    T. Liu, W. Zhao, and Y. Wang, Gravitational waveforms from the quasicircular inspiral of compact binaries in massive Brans-Dicke theory, Phys. Rev. D102, 124035 (2020), arXiv:2007.10068 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  51. [51]

    Y. Xie, A. K.-W. Chung, T. P. Sotiriou, and N. Yunes, Bayesian Search of Massive Scalar Fields from LIGO- Virgo-KAGRA Binaries, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 191402 (2025), arXiv:2410.14801 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Hidden-Sector Modifications to Gravitational Waves From Binary Inspirals

    S. Alexander, E. McDonough, R. Sims, and N. Yunes, Hidden-Sector Modifications to Gravitational Waves From Binary Inspirals, Class. Quant. Grav.35, 235012 (2018), arXiv:1808.05286 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  53. [53]

    C. B. Owen, A. Tucker, Y. Kahn, and N. Yunes, Con- straining dark-sector effects using gravitational waves from compact binary inspirals, Phys. Rev. D111, 124042 (2025), arXiv:2503.04916 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Mis-Modelling in Gravitational Wave Astronomy: The Trouble With Templates

    L. Sampson, N. Cornish, and N. Yunes, Mismodeling in gravitational-wave astronomy: The trouble with tem- plates, Phys. Rev. D89, 064037 (2014), arXiv:1311.4898 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  55. [55]

    Y. Xie, D. Chatterjee, G. Narayan, and N. Yunes, Neural post-Einsteinian framework for efficient theory-agnostic tests of general relativity with gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D110, 024036 (2024), arXiv:2403.18936 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  56. [56]

    D. P. Kingma and M. Welling, Auto-Encoding Varia- tional Bayes, (2013), arXiv:1312.6114 [stat.ML]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  57. [57]

    Gravity with a dynamical preferred frame

    T. Jacobson and D. Mattingly, Gravity with a dynam- ical preferred frame, Phys. Rev. D64, 024028 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0007031

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  58. [58]

    Einstein-aether gravity: a status report

    T. Jacobson, Einstein-aether gravity: A Status report, PoSQG-PH, 020 (2007), arXiv:0801.1547 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  59. [59]

    D. Blas, O. Pujolas, and S. Sibiryakov, Consistent Ex- tension of Horava Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 181302 (2010), arXiv:0909.3525 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  60. [60]

    D. Blas, O. Pujolas, and S. Sibiryakov, Models of non- relativistic quantum gravity: The Good, the bad and the healthy, JHEP04, 018, arXiv:1007.3503 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  61. [61]

    Constraining non-commutative space-time from GW150914

    A. Kobakhidze, C. Lagger, and A. Manning, Constrain- ing noncommutative spacetime from GW150914, Phys. Rev. D94, 064033 (2016), arXiv:1607.03776 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  62. [62]

    P. A. M. Dirac, The Cosmological constants, Nature139, 323 (1937)

    work page 1937

  63. [63]

    Constraining the evolutionary history of Newton's constant with gravitational wave observations

    N. Yunes, F. Pretorius, and D. Spergel, Constraining the evolutionary history of Newton’s constant with grav- itational wave observations, Phys. Rev. D81, 064018 (2010), arXiv:0912.2724 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  64. [64]

    Yamada, T

    K. Yamada, T. Narikawa, and T. Tanaka, Testing massive-field modifications of gravity via gravitational waves, PTEP2019, 103E01 (2019), arXiv:1905.11859 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  65. [65]

    Mezzasoma and N

    S. Mezzasoma and N. Yunes, Theory-agnostic frame- work for inspiral tests of general relativity with higher- harmonic gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D106, 024026 (2022), arXiv:2203.15934 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  66. [66]

    Projected Constraints on Scalarization with Gravitational Waves from Neutron Star Binaries

    L. Sampson, N. Yunes, N. Cornish, M. Ponce, E. Ba- rausse, A. Klein, C. Palenzuela, and L. Lehner, Projected Constraints on Scalarization with Gravitational Waves from Neutron Star Binaries, Phys. Rev. D90, 124091 (2014), arXiv:1407.7038 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  67. [67]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Prospects for observing and localizing gravitational-wave transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA, Living Rev. Rel.19, 1 (2016), arXiv:1304.0670 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  68. [68]

    Open data from the first and second observing runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Open data from the first and second observing runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo, SoftwareX13, 100658 (2021), arXiv:1912.11716 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2021

  69. [69]

    Open data from the third observing run of LIGO, Virgo, KAGRA and GEO

    R. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), Open Data from the Third Observing Run of LIGO, Virgo, KAGRA, and GEO, Astrophys. J. Suppl.267, 29 (2023), arXiv:2302.03676 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023

  70. [70]

    A simple model of complete precessing black-hole-binary gravitational waveforms

    M. Hannam, P. Schmidt, A. Bohé, L. Haegel, S. Husa, F. Ohme, G. Pratten, and M. Pürrer, Simple Model of Complete Precessing Black-Hole-Binary Gravitational Waveforms, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 151101 (2014), arXiv:1308.3271 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  71. [71]

    S. Husa, S. Khan, M. Hannam, M. Pürrer, F. Ohme, X. Jiménez Forteza, and A. Bohé, Frequency-domain gravitational waves from nonprecessing black-hole bina- ries. I. New numerical waveforms and anatomy of the sig- nal, Phys. Rev. D93, 044006 (2016), arXiv:1508.07250 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  72. [72]

    S. Khan, S. Husa, M. Hannam, F. Ohme, M. Pür- rer, X. Jiménez Forteza, and A. Bohé, Frequency- domain gravitational waves from nonprecessing black- hole binaries. II. A phenomenological model for the ad- vanced detector era, Phys. Rev. D93, 044007 (2016), arXiv:1508.07253 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  73. [73]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW190412: Observation of a Binary-Black-Hole Coalescence with Asymmetric Masses, Phys. Rev. D102, 043015 (2020), arXiv:2004.08342 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  74. [74]

    Computationally efficient models for the dominant and sub-dominant harmonic modes of precessing binary black holes

    G. Prattenet al., Computationally efficient models for the dominant and subdominant harmonic modes of pre- cessing binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D103, 104056 (2021), arXiv:2004.06503 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  75. [75]

    Pratten, S

    G. Pratten, S. Husa, C. Garcia-Quiros, M. Colleoni, A. Ramos-Buades, H. Estelles, and R. Jaume, Setting the cornerstone for a family of models for gravitational waves from compact binaries: The dominant harmonic for nonprecessing quasicircular black holes, Phys. Rev. D 102, 064001 (2020), arXiv:2001.11412 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  76. [76]

    Multimode frequency- domain model for the gravitational wave signal from non- precessing black-hole binaries,

    C. García-Quirós, M. Colleoni, S. Husa, H. Estel- lés, G. Pratten, A. Ramos-Buades, M. Mateu-Lucena, and R. Jaume, Multimode frequency-domain model for the gravitational wave signal from nonprecessing black-hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D102, 064002 (2020), arXiv:2001.10914 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  77. [77]

    Bilby: A user-friendly Bayesian inference library for gravitational-wave astronomy

    G. Ashtonet al., BILBY: A user-friendly Bayesian infer- encelibraryforgravitational-waveastronomy,Astrophys. J. Suppl.241, 27 (2019), arXiv:1811.02042 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  78. [78]

    J. S. Speagle, dynesty: a dynamic nested sampling package for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evi- dences, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.493, 3132 (2020), arXiv:1904.02180 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  79. [79]

    P. A. R. Adeet al.(Planck), Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.594, A13 (2016), arXiv:1502.01589 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  80. [80]

    Payne, S

    E. Payne, S. Hourihane, J. Golomb, R. Udall, R. Udall, D. Davis, and K. Chatziioannou, Curious case of GW200129: Interplay between spin-precession inference and data-quality issues, Phys. Rev. D106, 104017 (2022), arXiv:2206.11932 [gr-qc]. 8

    work page arXiv 2022

Showing first 80 references.