pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.19452 · v4 · submitted 2025-12-22 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc· quant-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Holographic Tensor Networks as Tessellations of Geometry

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 20:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qcquant-ph
keywords holographic tensor networksRyu-Takayanagi formulapartial entanglement entropyAdS tessellationentanglement threadstensor network modelsholographic entropy
0
0 comments X

The pith

Holographic tensor networks from partial-entanglement-entropy threads exactly reproduce the Ryu-Takayanagi formula.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper takes networks of partial-entanglement-entropy threads that form a perfect tessellation of AdS space and assigns quantum states to each vertex to create concrete tensor network models. These include a factorized version built from EPR pairs, a HaPPY-like version using perfect tensors, and a random version. In every construction the minimal number of links cut by a surface homologous to a boundary region equals the geometric area of that surface, so the Ryu-Takayanagi formula holds exactly. A sympathetic reader would care because this removes the usual gap between discrete toy models and continuous semi-classical geometry without extra fitting parameters.

Core claim

Assigning tensor states to the vertices of a PEE-thread tessellation of AdS produces holographic tensor networks in which the minimal number of cuts across any homologous surface equals the area of that surface, reproducing the Ryu-Takayanagi formula exactly in the factorized, perfect-tensor, and random cases.

What carries the argument

The PEE-thread network, a collection of bulk geodesics with density fixed by the Crofton formula, used as a lattice on which tensors are placed at vertices so that counting crossed links gives the entanglement entropy.

If this is right

  • The Ryu-Takayanagi formula holds exactly rather than approximately in these discrete models.
  • The result applies uniformly to factorized EPR-pair networks, HaPPY-style perfect-tensor networks, and random tensor networks.
  • The same tessellation method works for more symmetric geometries beyond pure AdS by invoking the Crofton formula.
  • Minimal-cut counting supplies a parameter-free geometric interpretation of entanglement entropy.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Exact area matching may let these models capture additional quantum-gravity features that approximate networks miss.
  • Numerical checks on small finite networks could directly verify the cut-area equality in explicit examples.
  • Similar tessellation techniques might extend the construction to time-dependent or less symmetric bulk geometries.

Load-bearing premise

The PEE-thread network forms a perfect tessellation whose link crossings can be counted directly as entanglement cuts whose total equals geometric area with no scaling or adjustment needed.

What would settle it

For a chosen boundary region in one of the constructed networks, count the minimal number of crossed links and compare it to the independently computed area of the corresponding bulk surface; any mismatch would show the equality fails.

read the original abstract

Holographic tensor networks serve as toy models for the Anti-de Sitter/Conformal Field Theory (AdS/CFT) correspondence, capturing many of its essential features in a concrete manner. However, existing holographic tensor network models remain far from a complete theory of quantum gravity. A key obstacle is their discrete structure, which only approximates the semi-classical geometry of gravity in a qualitative sense. In \cite{Lin:2024dho}, it was shown that a network of partial-entanglement-entropy (PEE) threads, which are bulk geodesics with a specific density distribution, generates a perfect tessellation of AdS space. Moreover, such PEE-network tessellations can be constructed for more highly symmetric geometries using the Crofton formula. In this paper, we assign a quantum state to each vertex in the PEE network and develop several holographic tensor network models: (1) the factorized PEE tensor network, which takes the form of a tensor product of EPR pairs; (2) the HaPPY-like PEE tensor network constructed from perfect tensors; and (3) the random PEE tensor network. In all these models, we reproduce the exact Ryu-Takayanagi formula by showing that the minimal number of cuts along a homologous surface in the network exactly equals the area of that surface.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper constructs three holographic tensor network models on PEE-thread tessellations of AdS space (factorized EPR-pair networks, HaPPY-like perfect-tensor networks, and random-tensor networks). It claims that each model exactly reproduces the Ryu-Takayanagi formula because the minimal number of cuts across any homologous surface equals the geometric area of that surface.

Significance. If the cut-count equality is shown to hold rigorously and independently, the work would strengthen holographic tensor networks by converting a qualitative approximation into an exact discrete realization of the RT formula. The systematic use of the prior PEE-tessellation geometry to host the tensor assignments is a clear organizational strength.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract: the central claim that 'the minimal number of cuts along a homologous surface in the network exactly equals the area of that surface' is asserted without any derivation, normalization argument, or explicit check that the discrete integer cut count matches the continuous area (rather than a proportional quantity) for a non-trivial surface.
  2. The reproduction of the RT formula is imported wholesale from the PEE-tessellation result of Lin:2024dho (via the Crofton formula) and then applied to the three tensor assignments; no independent verification is supplied that the link densities produce an exact numerical identity once the tensor states are placed at the vertices.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below, clarifying the structure of our arguments while indicating where revisions will strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: Abstract: the central claim that 'the minimal number of cuts along a homologous surface in the network exactly equals the area of that surface' is asserted without any derivation, normalization argument, or explicit check that the discrete integer cut count matches the continuous area (rather than a proportional quantity) for a non-trivial surface.

    Authors: The abstract condenses the central result. The derivation appears in the main text: the PEE-thread tessellation of Lin:2024dho, obtained via the Crofton formula, ensures that the minimal number of threads crossed by any homologous surface equals its geometric area. Our networks are built directly on these threads as links, so the integer cut count equals the area in units where the proportionality factor is fixed to unity by the tessellation density. We will revise the manuscript to add an explicit normalization paragraph and a concrete check (e.g., for a hemispherical boundary region) in Section 3 or an appendix. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The reproduction of the RT formula is imported wholesale from the PEE-tessellation result of Lin:2024dho (via the Crofton formula) and then applied to the three tensor assignments; no independent verification is supplied that the link densities produce an exact numerical identity once the tensor states are placed at the vertices.

    Authors: The geometric equality between minimal cut count and area is a property of the PEE tessellation alone and is independent of the states assigned to vertices. The three tensor assignments (factorized EPR, perfect tensors, random tensors) are selected precisely so that the entanglement entropy equals the min-cut value, which then coincides with the area. Link densities are fixed by the geometry before any tensor placement occurs. We nevertheless agree that an explicit verification step would improve clarity; we will insert a short subsection confirming the numerical identity for one model on a non-trivial surface. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

RT reproduction inherits cut-count=area equality from cited PEE-tessellation without independent derivation

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract]
    "In all these models, we reproduce the exact Ryu-Takayanagi formula by showing that the minimal number of cuts along a homologous surface in the network exactly equals the area of that surface."

    The equality between minimal cut count and geometric area is not derived from the tensor-network construction or any new calculation in this paper. It is taken directly from the PEE-thread tessellation result of the cited work Lin:2024dho, which sets thread densities via the Crofton formula so that discrete cuts reproduce continuous areas by construction. The present work only populates the vertices with quantum states and invokes the pre-established cut-counting rule.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that the three tensor-network models reproduce the exact RT formula because min cuts along a homologous surface equal the geometric area. This equality is asserted by direct appeal to the perfect tessellation property established in the cited prior work Lin:2024dho (via Crofton formula for thread density), rather than being re-derived from the tensor assignments or network rules introduced here. The new content (assigning EPR pairs, perfect tensors, or random tensors to vertices) does not alter or verify the cut-area relation; it simply inherits the geometric interpretation wholesale. This constitutes a moderate self-citation load-bearing step for the RT claim, but the models themselves add independent structure and the paper does not claim a first-principles derivation of the tessellation. No self-definitional loops, fitted predictions, or ansatz smuggling within the present text are present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The constructions rely on the geometric tessellation property established in the cited prior work and on standard properties of perfect tensors and random tensor networks. No new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract; the thread density is taken from the Crofton formula of the prior result.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption PEE threads form a perfect tessellation of AdS whose link lengths correspond to entanglement measures
    Invoked to justify that cut counting equals geometric area; taken from the cited Lin:2024dho result.
  • domain assumption Minimal cut count in the network equals the Ryu-Takayanagi area
    This is the target equality being reproduced; the abstract presents it as following from the network construction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5539 in / 1555 out tokens · 39931 ms · 2026-05-16T20:29:57.498201+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · 36 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    J. Lin, Y. Lu, Q. Wen and Y. Zhong, Weaving the (AdS) spaces with partial entanglement entropy threads, 2401.07471. – 14 –

  2. [2]

    Anti De Sitter Space And Holography

    E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150]

  3. [3]

    Gauge Theory Correlators from Non-Critical String Theory

    S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory , Phys. Lett. B 428 (1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109]

  4. [4]

    The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity

    J.M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

  5. [5]

    The Gravity Dual of a Density Matrix

    B. Czech, J.L. Karczmarek, F. Nogueira and M. Van Raamsdonk, The Gravity Dual of a Density Matrix , Class. Quant. Grav. 29 (2012) 155009 [1204.1330]

  6. [6]

    Holographic representation of local bulk operators

    A. Hamilton, D.N. Kabat, G. Lifschytz and D.A. Lowe, Holographic representation of local bulk operators, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 066009 [hep-th/0606141]

  7. [7]

    Boundary-to-bulk maps for AdS causal wedges and the Reeh-Schlieder property in holography

    I.A. Morrison, Boundary-to-bulk maps for AdS causal wedges and the Reeh-Schlieder property in holography, JHEP 05 (2014) 053 [1403.3426]

  8. [8]

    Light-sheets and AdS/CFT

    R. Bousso, S. Leichenauer and V. Rosenhaus, Light-sheets and AdS/CFT , Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 046009 [1203.6619]

  9. [9]

    Null Geodesics, Local CFT Operators and AdS/CFT for Subregions

    R. Bousso, B. Freivogel, S. Leichenauer, V. Rosenhaus and C. Zukowski, Null Geodesics, Local CFT Operators and AdS/CFT for Subregions , Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 064057 [1209.4641]

  10. [10]

    Causal Holographic Information

    V.E. Hubeny and M. Rangamani, Causal Holographic Information , JHEP 06 (2012) 114 [1204.1698]

  11. [11]

    Maximin Surfaces, and the Strong Subadditivity of the Covariant Holographic Entanglement Entropy

    A.C. Wall, Maximin Surfaces, and the Strong Subadditivity of the Covariant Holographic Entanglement Entropy , Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 225007 [1211.3494]

  12. [12]

    Causality & holographic entanglement entropy

    M. Headrick, V.E. Hubeny, A. Lawrence and M. Rangamani, Causality & holographic entanglement entropy , JHEP 12 (2014) 162 [1408.6300]

  13. [13]

    Relative entropy equals bulk relative entropy

    D.L. Jafferis, A. Lewkowycz, J. Maldacena and S.J. Suh, Relative entropy equals bulk relative entropy, JHEP 06 (2016) 004 [1512.06431]

  14. [14]

    X. Dong, D. Harlow and A.C. Wall, Reconstruction of Bulk Operators within the Entanglement Wedge in Gauge-Gravity Duality , Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 021601 [1601.05416]

  15. [15]

    Cotler, P

    J. Cotler, P. Hayden, G. Penington, G. Salton, B. Swingle and M. Walter, Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction via Universal Recovery Channels , Phys. Rev. X 9 (2019) 031011 [1704.05839]

  16. [16]

    Almheiri, X

    A. Almheiri, X. Dong and D. Harlow, Bulk locality and quantum error correction in AdS/CFT, Journal of High Energy Physics 2015 (2015)

  17. [17]

    Kamal and G

    H. Kamal and G. Penington, The Ryu-Takayanagi Formula from Quantum Error Correction: An Algebraic Treatment of the Boundary CFT , 1912.02240

  18. [18]

    Kang and D.K

    M.J. Kang and D.K. Kolchmeyer, Entanglement wedge reconstruction of infinite-dimensional von Neumann algebras using tensor networks , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 126018 [1910.06328]

  19. [19]

    Akers and G

    C. Akers and G. Penington, Quantum minimal surfaces from quantum error correction , SciPost Phys. 12 (2022) 157 [2109.14618]

  20. [20]

    Xu and H

    M. Xu and H. Zhong, Adding the algebraic Ryu-Takayanagi formula to the algebraic reconstruction theorem, 2411.06361. – 15 –

  21. [21]

    Crann and M.J

    J. Crann and M.J. Kang, Algebraic approach to spacetime bulk reconstruction , 2412.00298

  22. [22]

    Entanglement Renormalization and Holography

    B. Swingle, Entanglement Renormalization and Holography , Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 065007 [0905.1317]

  23. [23]

    Constructing holographic spacetimes using entanglement renormalization

    B. Swingle, Constructing holographic spacetimes using entanglement renormalization , 1209.3304

  24. [24]

    Exact holographic mapping and emergent space-time geometry

    X.-L. Qi, Exact holographic mapping and emergent space-time geometry , 1309.6282

  25. [25]

    cMERA as Surface/State Correspondence in AdS/CFT

    M. Miyaji, T. Numasawa, N. Shiba, T. Takayanagi and K. Watanabe, Continuous Multiscale Entanglement Renormalization Ansatz as Holographic Surface-State Correspondence , Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 171602 [1506.01353]

  26. [26]

    Tensor Networks from Kinematic Space

    B. Czech, L. Lamprou, S. McCandlish and J. Sully, Tensor Networks from Kinematic Space , JHEP 07 (2016) 100 [1512.01548]

  27. [27]

    The Ryu-Takayanagi Formula from Quantum Error Correction

    D. Harlow, The Ryu–Takayanagi Formula from Quantum Error Correction , Commun. Math. Phys. 354 (2017) 865 [1607.03901]

  28. [28]

    Vasseur, A.C

    R. Vasseur, A.C. Potter, Y.-Z. You and A.W.W. Ludwig, Entanglement Transitions from Holographic Random Tensor Networks , Phys. Rev. B 100 (2019) 134203 [1807.07082]

  29. [29]

    X. Dong, D. Harlow and D. Marolf, Flat entanglement spectra in fixed-area states of quantum gravity, JHEP 10 (2019) 240 [1811.05382]

  30. [30]

    L.-Y. Hung, W. Li and C.M. Melby-Thompson, p-adic CFT is a holographic tensor network , JHEP 04 (2019) 170 [1902.01411]

  31. [31]

    N. Bao, G. Penington, J. Sorce and A.C. Wall, Holographic Tensor Networks in Full AdS/CFT, 1902.10157

  32. [32]

    Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: Toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence

    F. Pastawski, B. Yoshida, D. Harlow and J. Preskill, Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: Toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence , JHEP 06 (2015) 149 [1503.06237]

  33. [33]

    Holographic duality from random tensor networks

    P. Hayden, S. Nezami, X.-L. Qi, N. Thomas, M. Walter and Z. Yang, Holographic duality from random tensor networks , JHEP 11 (2016) 009 [1601.01694]

  34. [34]

    Z. Yang, P. Hayden and X.-L. Qi, Bidirectional holographic codes and sub-AdS locality , JHEP 01 (2016) 175 [1510.03784]

  35. [35]

    Cheng, C

    N. Cheng, C. Lancien, G. Penington, M. Walter and F. Witteveen, Random Tensor Networks with Non-trivial Links , Annales Henri Poincare 25 (2024) 2107 [2206.10482]

  36. [36]

    X. Dong, S. McBride and W.W. Weng, Holographic tensor networks with bulk gauge symmetries, JHEP 02 (2024) 222 [2309.06436]

  37. [37]

    Chandra and T

    J. Chandra and T. Hartman, Toward random tensor networks and holographic codes in CFT , JHEP 05 (2023) 109 [2302.02446]

  38. [38]

    Chen, L.-Y

    L. Chen, L.-Y. Hung, Y. Jiang and B.-X. Lao, Deriving the non-perturbative gravitational dual of quantum Liouville theory from BCFT operator algebra , 2403.03179

  39. [39]

    Bao, L.-Y

    N. Bao, L.-Y. Hung, Y. Jiang and Z. Liu, QG from SymQRG: AdS 3/CFT2 Correspondence as Topological Symmetry-Preserving Quantum RG Flow , 2412.12045

  40. [40]

    S. Kaya, P. Rath and K. Ritchie, Hollow-grams: generalized entanglement wedges from the gravitational path integral , JHEP 09 (2025) 032 [2506.10064]

  41. [41]

    Akella, Tripartite entanglement in the HaPPY code is not holographic , 2510.08520

    S. Akella, Tripartite entanglement in the HaPPY code is not holographic , 2510.08520. – 16 –

  42. [42]

    Holographic Derivation of Entanglement Entropy from AdS/CFT

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT , Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001]

  43. [43]

    A Covariant Holographic Entanglement Entropy Proposal

    V.E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal, JHEP 07 (2007) 062 [0705.0016]

  44. [44]

    Casini, M

    H. Casini, M. Huerta and R.C. Myers, Towards a derivation of holographic entanglement entropy, Journal of High Energy Physics 2011 (2011)

  45. [45]

    Generalized gravitational entropy

    A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Generalized gravitational entropy , JHEP 08 (2013) 090 [1304.4926]

  46. [46]

    Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy

    T. Faulkner, A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy , JHEP 11 (2013) 074 [1307.2892]

  47. [47]

    Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime

    N. Engelhardt and A.C. Wall, Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime , JHEP 01 (2015) 073 [1408.3203]

  48. [48]

    J. Lin, Y. Lu and Q. Wen, Geometrizing the partial entanglement entropy: from PEE threads to bit threads , JHEP 2024 (2024) 191 [2311.02301]

  49. [49]

    Jia and M

    H.F. Jia and M. Rangamani, Petz reconstruction in random tensor networks , JHEP 10 (2020) 050 [2006.12601]

  50. [50]

    Fine structure in holographic entanglement and entanglement contour

    Q. Wen, Fine structure in holographic entanglement and entanglement contour , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 106004 [1803.05552]

  51. [51]

    Wen, Formulas for Partial Entanglement Entropy , Phys

    Q. Wen, Formulas for Partial Entanglement Entropy , Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (2020) 023170 [1910.10978]

  52. [52]

    Wen, Entanglement contour and modular flow from subset entanglement entropies , JHEP 05 (2020) 018 [1902.06905]

    Q. Wen, Entanglement contour and modular flow from subset entanglement entropies , JHEP 05 (2020) 018 [1902.06905]

  53. [53]

    Han and Q

    M. Han and Q. Wen, Entanglement entropy from entanglement contour: higher dimensions , SciPost Phys. Core 5 (2022) 020 [1905.05522]

  54. [54]

    Han and Q

    M. Han and Q. Wen, First law and quantum correction for holographic entanglement contour, SciPost Phys. 11 (2021) 058 [2106.12397]

  55. [55]

    Holographic entanglement contour, bit threads, and the entanglement tsunami

    J. Kudler-Flam, I. MacCormack and S. Ryu, Holographic entanglement contour, bit threads, and the entanglement tsunami , J. Phys. A 52 (2019) 325401 [1902.04654]

  56. [56]

    Entanglement contour

    G. Vidal and Y. Chen, Entanglement contour , J. Stat. Mech. 2014 (2014) P10011 [1406.1471]

  57. [57]

    Towards the generalized gravitational entropy for spacetimes with non-Lorentz invariant duals

    Q. Wen, Towards the generalized gravitational entropy for spacetimes with non-Lorentz invariant duals , JHEP 01 (2019) 220 [1810.11756]

  58. [58]

    D. Basu, J. Lin, Y. Lu and Q. Wen, Ownerless island and partial entanglement entropy in island phases , SciPost Phys. 15 (2023) 227 [2305.04259]

  59. [59]

    Rolph, Local measures of entanglement in black holes and CFTs , SciPost Phys

    A. Rolph, Local measures of entanglement in black holes and CFTs , SciPost Phys. 12 (2022) 079 [2107.11385]

  60. [60]

    Lin, J.-R

    Y.-Y. Lin, J.-R. Sun, Y. Sun and J.-C. Jin, The PEE aspects of entanglement islands from bit threads, JHEP 07 (2022) 009 [2203.03111]

  61. [61]

    Lin, Distilled density matrices of holographic partial entanglement entropy from thread-state correspondence, Phys

    Y.-Y. Lin, Distilled density matrices of holographic partial entanglement entropy from thread-state correspondence, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 106010 [2305.02895]. – 17 –

  62. [62]

    Wen, Balanced Partial Entanglement and the Entanglement Wedge Cross Section , JHEP 04 (2021) 301 [2103.00415]

    Q. Wen, Balanced Partial Entanglement and the Entanglement Wedge Cross Section , JHEP 04 (2021) 301 [2103.00415]

  63. [63]

    Wen and H

    Q. Wen and H. Zhong, Covariant entanglement wedge cross-section, balanced partial entanglement and gravitational anomalies , SciPost Phys. 13 (2022) 056 [2205.10858]

  64. [64]

    Q. Wen, M. Xu and H. Zhong, Partial entanglement entropy threads in the island phase , Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 046027 [2408.13535]

  65. [65]

    Camargo, P

    H.A. Camargo, P. Nandy, Q. Wen and H. Zhong, Balanced partial entanglement and mixed state correlations, SciPost Phys. 12 (2022) 137 [2201.13362]

  66. [66]

    Integral Geometry and Holography

    B. Czech, L. Lamprou, S. McCandlish and J. Sully, Integral Geometry and Holography , JHEP 10 (2015) 175 [1505.05515]

  67. [67]

    Bit threads and holographic entanglement

    M. Freedman and M. Headrick, Bit threads and holographic entanglement , Commun. Math. Phys. 352 (2017) 407 [1604.00354]

  68. [68]

    Riemannian and Lorentzian flow-cut theorems

    M. Headrick and V.E. Hubeny, Riemannian and Lorentzian flow-cut theorems , Class. Quant. Grav. 35 (2018) 10 [1710.09516]. – 18 –