pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2010.14527 · v3 · submitted 2020-10-27 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

R. Abbott , T. D. Abbott , S. Abraham , F. Acernese , K. Ackley , A. Adams , C. Adams , R. X. Adhikari
show 1344 more authors
V. B. Adya C. Affeldt M. Agathos K. Agatsuma N. Aggarwal O. D. Aguiar L. Aiello A. Ain P. Ajith S. Akcay G. Allen A. Allocca P. A. Altin A. Amato S. Anand A. Ananyeva S. B. Anderson W. G. Anderson S. V. Angelova S. Ansoldi J. M. Antelis S. Antier S. Appert K. Arai M. C. Araya J. S. Areeda M. Ar\`ene N. Arnaud S. M. Aronson K. G. Arun Y. Asali S. Ascenzi G. Ashton S. M. Aston P. Astone F. Aubin P. Aufmuth K. AultONeal C. Austin V. Avendano S. Babak F. Badaracco M. K. M. Bader S. Bae A. M. Baer S. Bagnasco J. Baird M. Ball G. Ballardin S. W. Ballmer A. Bals A. Balsamo G. Baltus S. Banagiri D. Bankar R. S. Bankar J. C. Barayoga C. Barbieri B. C. Barish D. Barker P. Barneo S. Barnum F. Barone B. Barr L. Barsotti M. Barsuglia D. Barta J. Bartlett I. Bartos R. Bassiri A. Basti M. Bawaj J. C. Bayley M. Bazzan B. R. Becher B. B\'ecsy V. M. Bedakihale M. Bejger I. Belahcene D. Beniwal M. G. Benjamin T. F. Bennett J. D. Bentley F. Bergamin B. K. Berger G. Bergmann S. Bernuzzi C. P. L. Berry D. Bersanetti A. Bertolini J. Betzwieser R. Bhandare A. V. Bhandari D. Bhattacharjee J. Bidler I. A. Bilenko G. Billingsley R. Birney O. Birnholtz S. Biscans M. Bischi S. Biscoveanu A. Bisht M. Bitossi M.-A. Bizouard J. K. Blackburn J. Blackman C. D. Blair D. G. Blair R. M. Blair O. Blanch F. Bobba N. Bode M. Boer Y. Boetzel G. Bogaert M. Boldrini F. Bondu R. Bonnand E. Bonilla P. Booker B. A. Boom R. Bork V. Boschi S. Bose V. Bossilkov V. Boudart Y. Bouffanais A. Bozzi C. Bradaschia P. R. Brady A. Bramley M. Branchesi J. E. Brau M. Breschi T. Briant J. H. Briggs F. Brighenti A. Brillet M. Brinkmann P. Brockill A. F. Brooks J. Brooks D. D. Brown S. Brunett G. Bruno R. Bruntz A. Buikema T. Bulik H. J. Bulten A. Buonanno R. Buscicchio D. Buskulic R. L. Byer M. Cabero L. Cadonati M. Caesar G. Cagnoli C. Cahillane J. Calder\'on Bustillo J. D. Callaghan T. A. Callister E. Calloni J. B. Camp M. Canepa K. C. Cannon H. Cao J. Cao G. Carapella F. Carbognani M. F. Carney M. Carpinelli G. Carullo T. L. Carver J. Casanueva Diaz C. Casentini S. Caudill M. Cavagli\`a F. Cavalier R. Cavalieri G. Cella P. Cerd\'a-Dur\'an E. Cesarini W. Chaibi K. Chakravarti C.-L. Chan C. Chan K. Chandra P. Chanial S. Chao P. Charlton E. A. Chase E. Chassande-Mottin D. Chatterjee D. Chattopadhyay M. Chaturvedi K. Chatziioannou A. Chen H. Y. Chen X. Chen Y. Chen H.-P. Cheng C. K. Cheong H. Y. Chia F. Chiadini R. Chierici A. Chincarini A. Chiummo G. Cho H. S. Cho M. Cho S. Choate N. Christensen Q. Chu S. Chua K. W. Chung S. Chung G. Ciani P. Ciecielag M. Cie\'slar M. Cifaldi A. A. Ciobanu R. Ciolfi F. Cipriano A. Cirone F. Clara E. N. Clark J. A. Clark L. Clarke P. Clearwater S. Clesse F. Cleva E. Coccia P.-F. Cohadon D. E. Cohen M. Colleoni C. G. Collette C. Collins M. Colpi M. Constancio Jr. L. Conti S. J. Cooper P. Corban T. R. Corbitt I. Cordero-Carri\'on S. Corezzi K. R. Corley N. Cornish D. Corre A. Corsi S. Cortese C. A. Costa R. Cotesta M. W. Coughlin S. B. Coughlin J.-P. Coulon S. T. Countryman B. Cousins P. Couvares P. B. Covas D. M. Coward M. J. Cowart D. C. Coyne R. Coyne J. D. E. Creighton T. D. Creighton M. Croquette S. G. Crowder J.R. Cudell T. J. Cullen A. Cumming R. Cummings L. Cunningham E. Cuoco M. Curylo T. Dal Canton G. D\'alya A. Dana L. M. DaneshgaranBajastani B. D'Angelo B. Danila S. L. Danilishin S. D'Antonio K. Danzmann C. Darsow-Fromm A. Dasgupta L. E. H. Datrier V. Dattilo I. Dave M. Davier G. S. Davies D. Davis E. J. Daw R. Dean D. DeBra M. Deenadayalan J. Degallaix M. De Laurentis S. Del\'eglise V. Del Favero F. De Lillo N. De Lillo W. Del Pozzo L. M. DeMarchi F. De Matteis V. D'Emilio N. Demos T. Denker T. Dent A. Depasse R. De Pietri R. De Rosa C. De Rossi R. DeSalvo O. de Varona S. Dhurandhar M. C. D\'iaz M. Diaz-Ortiz Jr. N. A. Didio T. Dietrich L. Di Fiore C. DiFronzo C. Di Giorgio F. Di Giovanni M. Di Giovanni T. Di Girolamo A. Di Lieto B. Ding S. Di Pace I. Di Palma F. Di Renzo A. K. Divakarla A. Dmitriev Z. Doctor L. D'Onofrio F. Donovan K. L. Dooley S. Doravari I. Dorrington T. P. Downes M. Drago J. C. Driggers Z. Du J.-G. Ducoin P. Dupej O. Durante D. D'Urso P.-A. Duverne S. E. Dwyer P. J. Easter G. Eddolls B. Edelman T. B. Edo O. Edy A. Effler J. Eichholz S. S. Eikenberry M. Eisenmann R. A. Eisenstein A. Ejlli L. Errico R. C. Essick H. Estell\'es D. Estevez Z. B. Etienne T. Etzel M. Evans T. M. Evans B. E. Ewing V. Fafone H. Fair S. Fairhurst X. Fan A. M. Farah S. Farinon B. Farr W. M. Farr E. J. Fauchon-Jones M. Favata M. Fays M. Fazio J. Feicht M. M. Fejer F. Feng E. Fenyvesi D. L. Ferguson A. Fernandez-Galiana I. Ferrante T. A. Ferreira F. Fidecaro P. Figura I. Fiori D. Fiorucci M. Fishbach R. P. Fisher J. M. Fishner R. Fittipaldi M. Fitz-Axen V. Fiumara R. Flaminio E. Floden E. Flynn H. Fong J. A. Font P. W. F. Forsyth J.-D. Fournier S. Frasca F. Frasconi Z. Frei A. Freise R. Frey V. Frey P. Fritschel V. V. Frolov G. G. Fronz\'e P. Fulda M. Fyffe H. A. Gabbard B. U. Gadre S. M. Gaebel J. R. Gair J. Gais S. Galaudage R. Gamba D. Ganapathy A. Ganguly S. G. Gaonkar B. Garaventa C. Garc\'ia-Quir\'os F. Garufi B. Gateley S. Gaudio V. Gayathri G. Gemme A. Gennai D. George J. George R. N. George L. Gergely S. Ghonge Abhirup Ghosh Archisman Ghosh S. Ghosh B. Giacomazzo L. Giacoppo J. A. Giaime K. D. Giardina D. R. Gibson C. Gier K. Gill P. Giri J. Glanzer A. E. Gleckl P. Godwin E. Goetz R. Goetz N. Gohlke B. Goncharov G. Gonz\'alez A. Gopakumar S. E. Gossan M. Gosselin R. Gouaty B. Grace A. Grado M. Granata V. Granata A. Grant S. Gras P. Grassia C. Gray R. Gray G. Greco A. C. Green R. Green E. M. Gretarsson H. L. Griggs G. Grignani A. Grimaldi E. Grimes S. J. Grimm H. Grote S. Grunewald P. Gruning J. G. Guerrero G. M. Guidi A. R. Guimaraes G. Guix\'e H. K. Gulati Y. Guo Anchal Gupta Anuradha Gupta P. Gupta E. K. Gustafson R. Gustafson F. Guzman L. Haegel O. Halim E. D. Hall E. Z. Hamilton G. Hammond M. Haney M. M. Hanke J. Hanks C. Hanna M. D. Hannam O. A. Hannuksela O. Hannuksela H. Hansen T. J. Hansen J. Hanson T. Harder T. Hardwick K. Haris J. Harms G. M. Harry I. W. Harry D. Hartwig R. K. Hasskew C.-J. Haster K. Haughian F. J. Hayes J. Healy A. Heidmann M. C. Heintze J. Heinze J. Heinzel H. Heitmann F. Hellman P. Hello A. F. Helmling-Cornell G. Hemming M. Hendry I. S. Heng E. Hennes J. Hennig M. H. Hennig F. Hernandez Vivanco M. Heurs S. Hild P. Hill A. S. Hines S. Hochheim E. Hofgard D. Hofman J. N. Hohmann A. M. Holgado N. A. Holland I. J. Hollows Z. J. Holmes K. Holt D. E. Holz P. Hopkins C. Horst J. Hough E. J. Howell C. G. Hoy D. Hoyland Y. Huang M. T. H\"ubner A. D. Huddart E. A. Huerta B. Hughey V. Hui S. Husa S. H. Huttner B. M. Hutzler R. Huxford T. Huynh-Dinh B. Idzkowski A. Iess S. Imperato H. Inchauspe C. Ingram G. Intini M. Isi B. R. Iyer V. JaberianHamedan T. Jacqmin S. J. Jadhav S. P. Jadhav A. L. James K. Jani K. Janssens N. N. Janthalur P. Jaranowski D. Jariwala R. Jaume A. C. Jenkins M. Jeunon J. Jiang G. R. Johns N. K. Johnson-McDaniel A. W. Jones D. I. Jones J. D. Jones P. Jones R. Jones R. J. G. Jonker L. Ju J. Junker C. V. Kalaghatgi V. Kalogera B. Kamai S. Kandhasamy G. Kang J. B. Kanner S. J. Kapadia D. P. Kapasi C. Karathanasis S. Karki R. Kashyap M. Kasprzack W. Kastaun S. Katsanevas E. Katsavounidis W. Katzman K. Kawabe F. K\'ef\'elian D. Keitel J. S. Key S. Khadka F. Y. Khalili I. Khan S. Khan E. A. Khazanov N. Khetan M. Khursheed N. Kijbunchoo C. Kim G. J. Kim J. C. Kim K. Kim W. S. Kim Y.-M. Kim C. Kimball P. J. King M. Kinley-Hanlon R. Kirchhoff J. S. Kissel L. Kleybolte S. Klimenko T. D. Knowles E. Knyazev P. Koch S. M. Koehlenbeck G. Koekoek S. Koley M. Kolstein K. Komori V. Kondrashov A. Kontos N. Koper M. Korobko W. Z. Korth M. Kovalam D. B. Kozak C. Kr\"amer V. Kringel N. V. Krishnendu A. Kr\'olak G. Kuehn A. Kumar P. Kumar Rahul Kumar Rakesh Kumar K. Kuns S. Kwang B. D. Lackey D. Laghi E. Lalande T. L. Lam A. Lamberts M. Landry B. B. Lane R. N. Lang J. Lange B. Lantz R. K. Lanza I. La Rosa A. Lartaux-Vollard P. D. Lasky M. Laxen A. Lazzarini C. Lazzaro P. Leaci S. Leavey Y. K. Lecoeuche H. M. Lee H. W. Lee J. Lee K. Lee J. Lehmann E. Leon N. Leroy N. Letendre Y. Levin A. Li J. Li K. J. L. Li T. G. F. Li X. Li F. Linde S. D. Linker J. N. Linley T. B. Littenberg J. Liu X. Liu M. Llorens-Monteagudo R. K. L. Lo A. Lockwood L. T. London A. Longo M. Lorenzini V. Loriette M. Lormand G. Losurdo J. D. Lough C. O. Lousto G. Lovelace H. L\"uck D. Lumaca A. P. Lundgren Y. Ma R. Macas M. MacInnis D. M. Macleod I. A. O. MacMillan A. Macquet I. Maga\~na Hernandez F. Maga\~na-Sandoval C. Magazz\`u R. M. Magee E. Majorana I. Maksimovic S. Maliakal A. Malik N. Man V. Mandic V. Mangano G. L. Mansell M. Manske M. Mantovani M. Mapelli F. Marchesoni F. Marion S. M\'arka Z. M\'arka C. Markakis A. S. Markosyan A. Markowitz E. Maros A. Marquina S. Marsat F. Martelli I. W. Martin R. M. Martin M. Martinez V. Martinez D. V. Martynov H. Masalehdan K. Mason E. Massera A. Masserot T. J. Massinger M. Masso-Reid S. Mastrogiovanni A. Matas M. Mateu-Lucena F. Matichard M. Matiushechkina N. Mavalvala E. Maynard J. J. McCann R. McCarthy D. E. McClelland S. McCormick L. McCuller S. C. McGuire C. McIsaac J. McIver D. J. McManus T. McRae S. T. McWilliams D. Meacher G. D. Meadors M. Mehmet A. K. Mehta A. Melatos D. A. Melchor G. Mendell A. Menendez-Vazquez R. A. Mercer L. Mereni K. Merfeld E. L. Merilh J. D. Merritt M. Merzougui S. Meshkov C. Messenger C. Messick R. Metzdorff P. M. Meyers F. Meylahn A. Mhaske A. Miani H. Miao I. Michaloliakos C. Michel H. Middleton L. Milano A. L. Miller M. Millhouse J. C. Mills E. Milotti M. C. Milovich-Goff O. Minazzoli Y. Minenkov Ll. M. Mir A. Mishkin C. Mishra T. Mistry S. Mitra V. P. Mitrofanov G. Mitselmakher R. Mittleman G. Mo K. Mogushi S. R. P. Mohapatra S. R. Mohite I. Molina M. Molina-Ruiz M. Mondin M. Montani C. J. Moore D. Moraru F. Morawski G. Moreno S. Morisaki B. Mours C. M. Mow-Lowry S. Mozzon F. Muciaccia Arunava Mukherjee D. Mukherjee Soma Mukherjee Subroto Mukherjee N. Mukund A. Mullavey J. Munch E. A. Mu\~niz P. G. Murray S. L. Nadji A. Nagar I. Nardecchia L. Naticchioni R. K. Nayak B. F. Neil J. Neilson G. Nelemans T. J. N. Nelson M. Nery A. Neunzert A. H. Nitz K. Y. Ng S. Ng C. Nguyen P. Nguyen T. Nguyen S. A. Nichols S. Nissanke F. Nocera M. Noh C. North D. Nothard L. K. Nuttall J. Oberling B. D. O'Brien J. O'Dell G. Oganesyan G. H. Ogin J. J. Oh S. H. Oh F. Ohme H. Ohta M. A. Okada C. Olivetto P. Oppermann R. J. Oram B. O'Reilly R. G. Ormiston L. F. Ortega R. O'Shaughnessy S. Ossokine C. Osthelder D. J. Ottaway H. Overmier B. J. Owen A. E. Pace G. Pagano M. A. Page G. Pagliaroli A. Pai S. A. Pai J. R. Palamos O. Palashov C. Palomba H. Pan P. K. Panda T. H. Pang C. Pankow F. Pannarale B. C. Pant F. Paoletti A. Paoli A. Paolone W. Parker D. Pascucci A. Pasqualetti R. Passaquieti D. Passuello M. Patel B. Patricelli E. Payne T. C. Pechsiri M. Pedraza M. Pegoraro A. Pele S. Penn A. Perego C. J. Perez C. P\'erigois A. Perreca S. Perri\`es J. Petermann D. Petterson H. P. Pfeiffer K. A. Pham K. S. Phukon O. J. Piccinni M. Pichot M. Piendibene F. Piergiovanni L. Pierini V. Pierro G. Pillant F. Pilo L. Pinard I. M. Pinto K. Piotrzkowski M. Pirello M. Pitkin E. Placidi W. Plastino C. Pluchar R. Poggiani E. Polini D. Y. T. Pong S. Ponrathnam P. Popolizio E. K. Porter A. Poverman J. Powell M. Pracchia A. K. Prajapati K. Prasai R. Prasanna G. Pratten T. Prestegard M. Principe G. A. Prodi L. Prokhorov P. Prosposito L. Prudenzi A. Puecher M. Punturo F. Puosi P. Puppo M. P\"urrer H. Qi V. Quetschke P. J. Quinonez R. Quitzow-James F. J. Raab G. Raaijmakers H. Radkins N. Radulesco P. Raffai H. Rafferty S. X. Rail S. Raja C. Rajan B. Rajbhandari M. Rakhmanov K. E. Ramirez T. D. Ramirez A. Ramos-Buades J. Rana K. Rao P. Rapagnani U. D. Rapol B. Ratto V. Raymond M. Razzano J. Read T. Regimbau L. Rei S. Reid D. H. Reitze P. Rettegno F. Ricci C. J. Richardson J. W. Richardson L. Richardson P. M. Ricker G. Riemenschneider K. Riles M. Rizzo N. A. Robertson F. Robinet A. Rocchi J. A. Rocha S. Rodriguez R. D. Rodriguez-Soto L. Rolland J. G. Rollins V. J. Roma M. Romanelli R. Romano C. L. Romel A. Romero I. M. Romero-Shaw J. H. Romie S. Ronchini C. A. Rose D. Rose K. Rose M. J. B. Rosell D. Rosi\'nska S. G. Rosofsky M. P. Ross S. Rowan S. J. Rowlinson Santosh Roy Soumen Roy P. Ruggi K. Ryan S. Sachdev T. Sadecki J. Sadiq M. Sakellariadou O. S. Salafia L. Salconi M. Saleem A. Samajdar E. J. Sanchez J. H. Sanchez L. E. Sanchez N. Sanchis-Gual J. R. Sanders L. Sandles K. A. Santiago E. Santos T. R. Saravanan N. Sarin B. Sassolas B. S. Sathyaprakash O. Sauter R. L. Savage V. Savant D. Sawant S. Sayah D. Schaetzl P. Schale M. Scheel J. Scheuer A. Schindler-Tyka P. Schmidt R. Schnabel R. M. S. Schofield A. Sch\"onbeck E. Schreiber B. W. Schulte B. F. Schutz O. Schwarm E. Schwartz J. Scott S. M. Scott M. Seglar-Arroyo E. Seidel D. Sellers A. S. Sengupta N. Sennett D. Sentenac V. Sequino A. Sergeev Y. Setyawati T. Shaffer M. S. Shahriar S. Sharifi A. Sharma P. Sharma P. Shawhan H. Shen M. Shikauchi R. Shink D. H. Shoemaker D. M. Shoemaker K. Shukla S. ShyamSundar M. Sieniawska D. Sigg L. P. Singer D. Singh N. Singh A. Singha A. Singhal A. M. Sintes V. Sipala V. Skliris B. J. J. Slagmolen T. J. Slaven-Blair J. Smetana J. R. Smith R. J. E. Smith S. N. Somala E. J. Son K. Soni S. Soni B. Sorazu V. Sordini F. Sorrentino N. Sorrentino R. Soulard T. Souradeep E. Sowell A. P. Spencer M. Spera A. K. Srivastava V. Srivastava K. Staats C. Stachie D. A. Steer J. Steinhoff M. Steinke J. Steinlechner S. Steinlechner D. Steinmeyer S. P. Stevenson G. Stolle-McAllister D. J. Stops M. Stover K. A. Strain G. Stratta A. Strunk R. Sturani A. L. Stuver J. S\"udbeck S. Sudhagar V. Sudhir H. G. Suh T. Z. Summerscales H. Sun L. Sun S. Sunil A. Sur J. Suresh P. J. Sutton B. L. Swinkels M. J. Szczepa\'nczyk M. Tacca S. C. Tait C. Talbot A. J. Tanasijczuk D. B. Tanner D. Tao A. Tapia E. N. Tapia San Martin J. D. Tasson R. Taylor R. Tenorio L. Terkowski M. P. Thirugnanasambandam L. M. Thomas M. Thomas P. Thomas J. E. Thompson S. R. Thondapu K. A. Thorne E. Thrane Shubhanshu Tiwari Srishti Tiwari V. Tiwari K. Toland A. E. Tolley M. Tonelli Z. Tornasi A. Torres-Forn\'e C. I. Torrie I. Tosta e Melo D. T\"oyr\"a A. T. Tran A. Trapananti F. Travasso G. Traylor M. C. Tringali A. Tripathee A. Trovato R. J. Trudeau D. S. Tsai K. W. Tsang M. Tse R. Tso L. Tsukada D. Tsuna T. Tsutsui M. Turconi A. S. Ubhi R. P. Udall K. Ueno D. Ugolini C. S. Unnikrishnan A. L. Urban S. A. Usman A. C. Utina H. Vahlbruch G. Vajente A. Vajpeyi G. Valdes M. Valentini V. Valsan N. van Bakel M. van Beuzekom J. F. J. van den Brand C. Van Den Broeck D. C. Vander-Hyde L. van der Schaaf J. V. van Heijningen M. Vardaro A. F. Vargas V. Varma S. Vass M. Vas\'uth A. Vecchio G. Vedovato J. Veitch P. J. Veitch K. Venkateswara J. Venneberg G. Venugopalan D. Verkindt Y. Verma D. Veske F. Vetrano A. Vicer\'e A. D. Viets A. Vijaykumar V. Villa-Ortega J.-Y. Vinet S. Vitale T. Vo H. Vocca C. Vorvick S. P. Vyatchanin A. R. Wade L. E. Wade M. Wade R. C. Walet M. Walker G. S. Wallace L. Wallace S. Walsh J. Z. Wang S. Wang W. H. Wang Y. F. Wang R. L. Ward J. Warner M. Was N. Y. Washington J. Watchi B. Weaver L. Wei M. Weinert A. J. Weinstein R. Weiss F. Wellmann L. Wen P. We{\ss}els J. W. Westhouse K. Wette J. T. Whelan D. D. White L. V. White B. F. Whiting C. Whittle D. M. Wilken D. Williams M. J. Williams A. R. Williamson J. L. Willis B. Willke D. J. Wilson M. H. Wimmer W. Winkler C. C. Wipf G. Woan J. Woehler J. K. Wofford I. C. F. Wong J. Wrangel J. L. Wright D. S. Wu D. M. Wysocki L. Xiao H. Yamamoto L. Yang Y. Yang Z. Yang M. J. Yap D. W. Yeeles A. Yoon Hang Yu Haocun Yu S. H. R. Yuen A. Zadro\.zny M. Zanolin T. Zelenova J.-P. Zendri M. Zevin J. Zhang L. Zhang R. Zhang T. Zhang C. Zhao G. Zhao Y. Zheng M. Zhou Z. Zhou X. J. Zhu A. B. Zimmerman Y. Zlochower M. E. Zucker J. Zweizig
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 13:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HE
keywords gravitational wave candidatescompact binary coalescencesfalse-alarm rateobserving runbinary black holesmass ratiosinspiral spinscatalog
0
0 comments X

The pith

By applying a false-alarm-rate threshold of two per year across four search pipelines, 39 candidate gravitational wave events from compact binary coalescences are identified, with expected contamination below 10 percent.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a catalog of gravitational wave signals detected during the first half of the third observing run. It selects 39 candidates by requiring that each of four independent search methods expects no more than two false positives per year. This selection is expected to include fewer than 10 percent noise artifacts. A reader should care because the events include new examples of massive black hole mergers and the first significantly asymmetric mass binaries, providing fresh data on how compact objects form and merge. The increased number of detections is consistent with improved instrument sensitivity.

Core claim

We report 39 candidate gravitational wave events from compact binary coalescences observed in the first half of the third observing run. Twenty-six were previously announced through notices and circulars and thirteen are reported here for the first time. The catalog includes binary black hole mergers with total masses from about 14 to 150 solar masses, as well as events with ambiguous component types. This is the first catalog to include systems with significantly asymmetric mass ratios. Eleven of the events have positive effective inspiral spins at 90 percent credibility, with no negative spins observed.

What carries the argument

The set of four search pipelines that each impose a false-alarm-rate threshold of two per year to identify candidate events while bounding the expected contamination fraction below 10 percent.

If this is right

  • The range of total masses for unambiguously identified binary black hole mergers now extends up to approximately 150 solar masses.
  • Binary systems with significantly asymmetric mass ratios are observed for the first time.
  • Eleven events show positive effective inspiral spins under the default prior, with none showing negative spins.
  • The rate of detections is consistent with the rate inferred from the previous catalog when the improved sensitivity is taken into account.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This expanded sample of events can be used to place tighter constraints on the distribution of black hole masses and spins.
  • The events with ambiguous component masses may represent neutron star-black hole binaries, which could be confirmed by future observations or multi-messenger signals.
  • Continued operation of the detectors is likely to reveal even more massive or asymmetric systems, further testing models of stellar evolution and binary formation.

Load-bearing premise

The background noise models used by the four search pipelines accurately represent the non-Gaussian and non-stationary properties of the detector noise.

What would settle it

A reanalysis of the data using different background estimation methods that finds substantially more than four of the 39 candidates to be consistent with noise fluctuations would indicate that the contamination fraction exceeds 10 percent.

read the original abstract

We report on gravitational wave discoveries from compact binary coalescences detected by Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo in the first half of the third observing run (O3a) between 1 April 2019 15:00 UTC and 1 October 2019 15:00. By imposing a false-alarm-rate threshold of two per year in each of the four search pipelines that constitute our search, we present 39 candidate gravitational wave events. At this threshold, we expect a contamination fraction of less than 10%. Of these, 26 candidate events were reported previously in near real-time through GCN Notices and Circulars; 13 are reported here for the first time. The catalog contains events whose sources are black hole binary mergers up to a redshift of ~0.8, as well as events whose components could not be unambiguously identified as black holes or neutron stars. For the latter group, we are unable to determine the nature based on estimates of the component masses and spins from gravitational wave data alone. The range of candidate events which are unambiguously identified as binary black holes (both objects $\geq 3~M_\odot$) is increased compared to GWTC-1, with total masses from $\sim 14~M_\odot$ for GW190924_021846 to $\sim 150~M_\odot$ for GW190521. For the first time, this catalog includes binary systems with significantly asymmetric mass ratios, which had not been observed in data taken before April 2019. We also find that 11 of the 39 events detected since April 2019 have positive effective inspiral spins under our default prior (at 90% credibility), while none exhibit negative effective inspiral spin. Given the increased sensitivity of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo, the detection of 39 candidate events in ~26 weeks of data (~1.5 per week) is consistent with GWTC-1.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports the GWTC-2 catalog of 39 candidate gravitational wave events from compact binary coalescences detected by LIGO and Virgo during O3a (April–October 2019). Using a false-alarm-rate threshold of two per year across four independent search pipelines, the authors bound expected contamination below 10%, present 13 new events, characterize binary black hole mergers up to redshift ~0.8 and systems with ambiguous component masses, and note the first detections of significantly asymmetric mass ratios plus a preference for positive effective inspiral spins.

Significance. If the background models and FAR estimates hold, this catalog substantially increases the sample of observed compact binary coalescences, enabling improved population inferences, tests of formation channels, and constraints on spin distributions. The multi-pipeline consistency, public data releases, and explicit contamination bound are strengths that support reproducibility and downstream analyses.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that 11 events have positive effective inspiral spin at 90% credibility would benefit from an explicit cross-reference to the table or section listing the individual posterior summaries and the default prior choice.
  2. [Search methodology] The description of the four search pipelines and their background estimation methods should include a brief statement on how the time-shift procedure accounts for non-stationary noise correlations between detectors.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive review of our manuscript and their recommendation to accept. We are pleased that the referee recognizes the value of the GWTC-2 catalog for population studies, formation channel tests, and spin constraints, as well as the strengths of our multi-pipeline approach, contamination bound, and public data releases.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

This is an observational catalog paper reporting counts and parameter estimates of gravitational-wave events from LIGO/Virgo data. The central result (39 candidates above a FAR threshold of 2/yr with <10% expected contamination) follows directly from applying four independent search pipelines to the strain data, using time-shift background estimation and standard waveform templates. No derivation step reduces by the paper's own equations to a fitted parameter or self-citation; background models are constructed externally to the signal hypotheses, and prior GWTC-1 citations supply only contextual comparison rather than load-bearing justification for the new detections.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The catalog rests on standard assumptions of general relativity for waveform templates and on empirical noise models calibrated from detector data rather than new theoretical postulates.

free parameters (1)
  • false_alarm_rate_threshold
    Set at two events per year per pipeline to achieve <10% contamination; this is a deliberate choice rather than a fitted value.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption General relativity provides accurate waveform models for compact binary coalescences across the observed mass and spin range
    Invoked for matched filtering and parameter estimation in all four pipelines.
  • domain assumption Detector noise can be characterized sufficiently well by the background estimation procedures to yield reliable false-alarm rates
    Central to the FAR threshold and contamination estimate.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 13407 in / 1406 out tokens · 48255 ms · 2026-05-13T13:16:12.483465+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 27 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. GW240925 and GW250207: Astrophysical Calibration of Gravitational-wave Detectors

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    The first informative astrophysical calibration of gravitational-wave detectors is reported using GW240925 and GW250207.

  2. Constraints on the Primordial Black Hole Abundance using Pulsar Parameter Drifts

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    The first search for scalar-induced gravitational waves via pulsar parameter drifts yields f_PBH < 10^{-10} (95% CL) for PBH masses 0.3 to 4e4 solar masses, strongly disfavoring a primordial black hole origin for LVK ...

  3. Testing the Kerr hypothesis beyond the quadrupole with GW241011

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    GW241011 data shows consistency with Kerr black holes for both quadrupole and octupole moments and delivers the first observational bounds on spin-induced octupole deviations.

  4. Including higher-order modes in a quadrupolar eccentric numerical relativity surrogate using universal eccentric modulation functions

    gr-qc 2026-04 conditional novelty 7.0

    The gwNRHME framework constructs a multi-modal non-spinning eccentric gravitational waveform surrogate by modulating quasi-circular models with universal eccentric functions, achieving median mismatches of ~9e-5 again...

  5. Gravitational wave signal and noise response of an optically levitated sensor in a Fabry-P\'erot cavity

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A general relativistic derivation of gravitational wave response in an optically levitated cavity sensor reveals position-dependent strain sensitivity and suppressed input-mirror noise coupling.

  6. Analytical Fluxes from Generic Schwarzschild Geodesics

    gr-qc 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    A Chebyshev-basis expansion reduces gravitational-wave fluxes from arbitrary-eccentricity bound Schwarzschild geodesics to sums of previously derived Keplerian Fourier coefficients, achieving 10^{-5} relative accuracy...

  7. Efficient and Stable Computation of Gravitational-Wave Fluxes from Generic Kerr Orbits via a Unified HeunC Framework

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A unified confluent HeunC framework computes gravitational-wave fluxes from generic Kerr orbits with 10^{-11} relative errors and speedups of 3-60x over existing packages for low- and high-order modes.

  8. Efficient and Stable Computation of Gravitational-Wave Fluxes from Generic Kerr Orbits via a Unified HeunC Framework

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A unified confluent HeunC framework with hybrid connection-coefficient computation and adaptive bi-power quadrature yields relative errors of order 10^{-11} and 2-10x speedups over existing packages for total radiativ...

  9. Implications of the LISA stochastic signal from eccentric stellar mass black hole binaries in vacuum

    gr-qc 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    High initial eccentricities in stellar-mass black hole binaries produce a stochastic gravitational wave background distinguishable by LISA from quasi-circular models, enabling upper bounds on eccentricity and separati...

  10. Gravitational Waves from a Black Hole Falling Radially into a Thin-Shell Traversable Wormhole

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Analytic gravitational waveforms from radial test-particle infall into a thin-shell traversable wormhole exhibit a characteristic pulse-gap structure from repeated throat crossings and lie within reach of ground-based...

  11. Normalizing flows for density estimation in multi-detector gravitational-wave searches

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Normalizing flows replace binned histograms for estimating multi-detector signal parameters in PyCBC, slashing storage by three orders of magnitude with under 0.05% sensitivity loss and up to 6.55% gains in specific cases.

  12. Post-Newtonian inspiral waveform model for eccentric precessing binaries with higher-order modes and matter effects

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    pyEFPEHM extends prior PN models to include higher-order quasi-circular phasing, generalized precession solutions, and eccentric corrections up to 1PN in selected multipoles for eccentric precessing binaries with matt...

  13. Second-Generation Mass Peak in the Gravitational-Wave Population as a Probe of Globular Clusters

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Dynamical formation in globular clusters produces a robust second black-hole mass peak at ~70 solar masses from second-generation mergers when the first-generation spectrum is truncated by pair-instability supernovae.

  14. Posterior Predictive Checks for Gravitational-wave Populations: Limitations and Improvements

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Maximum-likelihood-based posterior predictive checks detect model misspecification better than event-level versions for uncertain spin tilts, but current detector sensitivity limits their power; the Gaussian Component...

  15. Computationally efficient models for the dominant and sub-dominant harmonic modes of precessing binary black holes

    gr-qc 2020-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    IMRPhenomXPHM is a new computationally efficient phenomenological model for precessing binary black hole gravitational-wave signals that incorporates higher-order modes via twisting-up maps from non-precessing waveforms.

  16. Assessing the imprint of eccentricity in GW signatures using two independent waveform models

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 conditional novelty 5.0

    Dual-model analysis of 162 GW sources disfavors eccentricity for most events but finds potential evidence in GW200129, GW231001, and GW231123.

  17. The Impact of Spin Priors on Parameterized Tests of General Relativity

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Spin prior choices propagate into tests of GR via the 1.5PN deviation parameter δφ̂3 in a non-trivial, event-dependent way, with stronger effects for short-inspiral events and partial degeneracy with χ_eff when the de...

  18. Ringdown Analysis of GW250114 with Orthonormal Modes

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Orthonormal QNM analysis of GW250114 raises the significance of the first overtone of the ℓ=m=2 mode from 82.5% to 99.9% and detects no significant deviation from Kerr predictions.

  19. Purely Quadratic Non-Gaussianity from Tachyonic Instability: Primordial Black Holes and Scalar-Induced Gravitational Waves

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Purely quadratic non-Gaussianity from tachyonic instability allows narrow curvature spectra to exponentially suppress primordial black hole overproduction via correlation coefficient ρ approaching -1 while retaining s...

  20. Bayesian Analysis of Gravitational Wave Microlensing Effects from Galactic Double White Dwarfs

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Bayesian analysis of simulated Taiji observations shows microlensing from lenses above 10^5 solar masses can be distinguished from unlensed DWD signals when separation is below 3 Einstein radii, while lower masses or ...

  21. Inference of recoil kicks from binary black hole mergers up to GWTC--4 and their astrophysical implications

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Recoil kicks are inferred for GWTC-4 binary black hole events with values up to nearly 1000 km/s for some, yielding retention probabilities of 1-5% in globular clusters and 70-100% in elliptical galaxies.

  22. Tests of General Relativity with Binary Black Holes from the second LIGO-Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog

    gr-qc 2020-10 accept novelty 5.0

    No evidence for deviations from general relativity is found in LIGO-Virgo binary black hole events, with improved constraints on waveform parameters, graviton mass, and ringdown properties.

  23. Gravitational-wave astronomy requires population-informed parameter estimation

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Population-informed hierarchical parameter estimation is required for unbiased astrophysical interpretation of gravitational-wave events rather than using standard individual posteriors with reference priors.

  24. Not too close! Evaluating the impact of the baseline on the localization of binary black holes by next-generation gravitational-wave detectors

    gr-qc 2026-04 conditional novelty 4.0

    Baselines of 8-11 ms light travel time for two CE detectors provide a reasonable compromise for BBH sky localization, with third detectors eliminating multimodality for most or all events.

  25. GW190711_030756 and GW200114_020818: astrophysical interpretation of two asymmetric binary black hole mergers in the IAS catalog

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Two asymmetric BBH mergers are characterized with mass ratios 0.35 and ≤0.20; one shows high spins, negative χ_eff, and strong precession, suggesting an emerging population of massive rapidly spinning systems.

  26. Cosmology Intertwined: A Review of the Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Associated with the Cosmological Tensions and Anomalies

    astro-ph.CO 2022-03 accept novelty 2.0

    The paper reviews cosmological tensions including the H0 and S8 discrepancies and explores new physics models that could explain them.

  27. The Science of the Einstein Telescope

    gr-qc 2025-03

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

298 extracted references · 298 canonical work pages · cited by 26 Pith papers · 8 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

  2. [2]

    Advanced LIGO

    J. Aasi et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Ad- vanced LIGO, Class. Quantum Grav.32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

  3. [3]

    Advanced Virgo: a 2nd generation interferometric gravitational wave detector

    F. Acernese et al. (Virgo Collaboration), Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravita- tional wave detector, Class. Quantum Grav. 32, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc]

  4. [4]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), GW151226: Observation of Grav- itational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 241103 (2016), arXiv:1606.04855 [gr-qc]

  5. [5]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collabora- tion, Virgo Collaboration), GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 221101 (2017), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 129901 (2018)], arXiv:1706.01812 [gr-qc]

  6. [6]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), GW170608: Observation of a 19- solar-mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence, Astrophys. J. 851, L35 (2017), arXiv:1711.05578 [astro-ph.HE]

  7. [7]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), GW170814: A Three-Detector Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Coalescence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 141101 (2017), arXiv:1709.09660 [gr-qc]

  8. [8]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Ob- served by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Sec- ond Observing Runs, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031040 (2019), arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE]

  9. [9]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collabora- tion, Virgo Collaboration), Tests of general relativ- ity with GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 221101 (2016), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 129902 (2018)], arXiv:1602.03841 [gr-qc]

  10. [10]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), Tests of General Relativity with the Binary Black Hole Signals from the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1, Phys. Rev. D 100, 104036 (2019), arXiv:1903.04467 [gr-qc]

  11. [11]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), Binary Black Hole Population Properties Inferred from the First and Second Observ- ing Runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo, As- trophys. J. 882, L24 (2019), arXiv:1811.12940 [astro- ph.HE]

  12. [12]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), GW170817: Observation of Grav- itational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

  13. [13]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, Fermi-GBM, INTEGRAL), Gravi- tational Waves and Gamma-rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A, Astrophys. J. 848, L13 (2017), arXiv:1710.05834 [astro-ph.HE]

  14. [14]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collabora- tion, Virgo Collaboration, Fermi GBM, INTEGRAL, IceCube, AstroSat Cadmium Zinc Telluride Imager Team, IPN, Insight-Hxmt, ANTARES, Swift, AGILE Team, 1M2H Team, Dark Energy Camera GW-EM, DES, DLT40, GRAWITA, Fermi-LAT, ATCA, ASKAP, Las Cumbres Observatory Group, OzGrav, DWF (Deeper Wider Faster Program), AST3,...

  15. [15]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), GW170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 161101 (2018), arXiv:1805.11581 [gr-qc]

  16. [16]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), Model comparison from LIGO- Virgo data on GW170817’s binary components and consequences for the merger remnant, Class. Quantum Grav. 37, 045006 (2020), arXiv:1908.01012 [gr-qc]

  17. [17]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, 1M2H, Dark Energy Camera GW- E, DES, DLT40, Las Cumbres Observatory, VIN- ROUGE, MASTER), A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant, Nature 551, 85 (2017), arXiv:1710.05835 [astro-ph.CO]

  18. [18]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), A gravitational-wave measure- ment of the Hubble constant following the second observing run of Advanced LIGO and Virgo (2019), arXiv:1908.06060 [astro-ph.CO]

  19. [19]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), Tests of General Relativity with GW170817, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 011102 (2019), arXiv:1811.00364 [gr-qc]

  20. [20]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaboration), Open data from the first and second observing runs of Ad- vanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo (2019), arXiv:1912.11716 [gr-qc]

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), Open data from the first and second ob- serving runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo (2019), arXiv:1912.11716 [gr-qc]

  21. [21]

    A. Trovato (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Col- laboration), GWOSC: Gravitational Wave Open Science Center, Proceedings, The New Era of Multi-Messenger Astrophysics (ASTERICS 2019): Groningen, Nether- lands, March 25-29, 2019 , PoS Asterics2019, 082 (2020)

  22. [22]

    Zackay, L

    B. Zackay, L. Dai, T. Venumadhav, J. Roulet, and M. Zaldarriaga, Detecting Gravitational Waves With Disparate Detector Responses: Two New Binary Black Hole Mergers (2019), arXiv:1910.09528 [astro-ph.HE]. 45

  23. [23]

    Venumadhav, B

    T. Venumadhav, B. Zackay, J. Roulet, L. Dai, and M. Zaldarriaga, New binary black hole mergers in the second observing run of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo, Phys. Rev. D 101, 083030 (2020), arXiv:1904.07214 [astro-ph.HE]

  24. [24]

    Venumadhav, B

    T. Venumadhav, B. Zackay, J. Roulet, L. Dai, and M. Zaldarriaga, New search pipeline for compact bi- nary mergers: Results for binary black holes in the first observing run of Advanced LIGO, Phys. Rev. D 100, 023011 (2019), arXiv:1902.10341 [astro-ph.IM]

  25. [25]

    Zackay, T

    B. Zackay, T. Venumadhav, L. Dai, J. Roulet, and M. Zaldarriaga, Highly spinning and aligned binary black hole merger in the Advanced LIGO first observing run, Phys. Rev. D100, 023007 (2019), arXiv:1902.10331 [astro-ph.HE]

  26. [26]

    A. H. Nitz, C. Capano, A. B. Nielsen, S. Reyes, R. White, D. A. Brown, and B. Krishnan, 1-OGC: The first open gravitational-wave catalog of binary mergers from analysis of public Advanced LIGO data, Astro- phys. J. 872, 195 (2019), arXiv:1811.01921 [gr-qc]

  27. [27]

    A. H. Nitz, T. Dent, G. S. Davies, S. Kumar, C. D. Capano, I. Harry, S. Mozzon, L. Nuttall, A. Lundgren, and M. T´ apai, 2-OGC: Open Gravitational-wave Cata- log of binary mergers from analysis of public Advanced LIGO and Virgo data, Astrophys. J. 891, 123 (2019), arXiv:1910.05331 [astro-ph.HE]

  28. [28]

    Magee et al

    R. Magee et al. , Sub-threshold Binary Neutron Star Search in Advanced LIGO’s First Observing Run, As- trophys. J. 878, L17 (2019), arXiv:1901.09884 [gr-qc]

  29. [29]

    Allen, W

    B. Allen, W. G. Anderson, P. R. Brady, D. A. Brown, and J. D. E. Creighton, FINDCHIRP: An Algorithm for detection of gravitational waves from inspiraling com- pact binaries, Phys. Rev. D85, 122006 (2012), arXiv:gr- qc/0509116 [gr-qc]

  30. [30]

    H.-Y. Chen, D. E. Holz, J. Miller, M. Evans, S. Vitale, and J. Creighton, Distance measures in gravitational-wave astrophysics and cosmology (2017), arXiv:1709.08079 [astro-ph.CO]

  31. [31]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration, GCN 25871, 25829, 25753, 25503, 25497, 25324, 25187, 25164, 25115, 25012, 24998, 24950, 24922, 24717, 24632, 24621, 24598, 24570, 24522, 24503, 24377, 24237, 24168, 24141, 24098, 24069 (2019)

  32. [32]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collabora- tion, Virgo Collaboration), GW190425: Observa- tion of a Compact Binary Coalescence with Total Mass ∼ 3.4M⊙, Astrophys. J. Lett. 892, L3 (2020), arXiv:2001.01761 [astro-ph.HE]

  33. [33]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 Solar Mass Black Hole with a 2.6 Solar Mass Compact Object, Astrophys. J. 896, L44 (2020), arXiv:2006.12611 [astro- ph.HE]

  34. [34]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaboration), Phys

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), GW190521: A Binary Black Hole Merger with a Total Mass of 150 M⊙, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 101102 (2020), arXiv:2009.01075 [gr-qc]

  35. [35]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaboration), Astrophys

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), Properties and astrophysical impli- cations of the 150 M⊙ binary black hole merger GW190521, Astrophys. J. Lett. 900, L13 (2020), arXiv:2009.01190 [astro-ph.HE]

  36. [36]

    Collaborations, Tests of General Rel- ativity with Binary Black Holes from the second LIGO–Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog, LIGO DCC P2000091, 1 (2020)

    LIGO and V. Collaborations, Tests of General Rel- ativity with Binary Black Holes from the second LIGO–Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog, LIGO DCC P2000091, 1 (2020)

  37. [37]

    Collaborations, Population properties of compact objects from the second LIGO–Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog, LIGO DCC P2000077, 1 (2020)

    LIGO and V. Collaborations, Population properties of compact objects from the second LIGO–Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog, LIGO DCC P2000077, 1 (2020)

  38. [39]

    Vajente, E

    G. Vajente, E. K. Gustafson, and D. H. Reitze, Chapter three - precision interferometry for gravitational wave detection: Current status and future trends (Academic Press, 2019) pp. 75 – 148

  39. [40]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), Binary Black Hole Mergers in the first Advanced LIGO Observing Run, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041015 (2016), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. X 8, 039903 (2018)], arXiv:1606.04856 [gr-qc]

  40. [41]

    Buikema et al

    A. Buikema et al. (aLIGO), Sensitivity and Perfor- mance of the Advanced LIGO Detectors in the Third Observing Run, Phys. Rev. D 102, 062003 (2020), arXiv:2008.01301 [astro-ph.IM]

  41. [42]

    J. C. Driggers et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Improving astrophysical parameter estimation via of- fline noise subtraction for Advanced LIGO, Phys. Rev. D 99, 042001 (2019), arXiv:1806.00532 [astro-ph.IM]

  42. [43]

    Billingsley, H

    G. Billingsley, H. Yamamoto, and L. Zhang, Charac- terization of Advanced LIGO Core Optics, Proceedings American Society for Precision Engineering (ASPE) 2017 Spring Topical Meeting Volume 66 , 78 (2017)

  43. [44]

    Dolesi, M

    R. Dolesi, M. Hueller, D. Nicolodi, D. Tombolato, S. Vi- tale, P. J. Wass, W. J. Weber, M. Evans, P. Fritschel, R. Weiss, J. H. Gundlach, C. A. Hagedorn, S. Schlam- minger, G. Ciani, and A. Cavalleri, Brownian force noise from molecular collisions and the sensitivity of ad- vanced gravitational wave observatories, Phys. Rev. D 84, 063007 (2011)

  44. [45]

    Brooks, Point absorbers in Advanced LIGO

    A. Brooks, Point absorbers in Advanced LIGO

  45. [46]

    Evans, S

    M. Evans, S. Gras, P. Fritschel, J. Miller, L. Bar- sotti, D. Martynov, A. Brooks, D. Coyne, R. Ab- bott, R. X. Adhikari, K. Arai, R. Bork, B. Kells, J. Rollins, N. Smith-Lefebvre, G. Vajente, H. Ya- mamoto, C. Adams, S. Aston, J. Betzweiser, V. Frolov, A. Mullavey, A. Pele, J. Romie, M. Thomas, K. Thorne, S. Dwyer, K. Izumi, K. Kawabe, D. Sigg, R. Derosa...

  46. [47]

    Biscans, S

    S. Biscans, S. Gras, C. D. Blair, J. Driggers, M. Evans, P. Fritschel, T. Hardwick, and G. Mansell, Suppressing parametric instabilities in LIGO using low-noise acous- tic mode dampers, Phys. Rev. D 100, 122003 (2019), arXiv:1909.07805 [physics.app-ph]

  47. [48]

    Schnabel, N

    R. Schnabel, N. Mavalvala, D. E. Mcclelland, and P. K. Lam, Quantum metrology for gravitational wave astron- omy, Nature Commun. 1, 121 (2010)

  48. [49]

    Barsotti, J

    L. Barsotti, J. Harms, and R. Schnabel, Squeezed vac- uum states of light for gravitational wave detectors, Rept. Prog. Phys. 82, 016905 (2019)

  49. [50]

    Tse et al., Quantum-Enhanced Advanced LIGO De- tectors in the Era of Gravitational-Wave Astronomy, 46 Phys

    M. Tse et al., Quantum-Enhanced Advanced LIGO De- tectors in the Era of Gravitational-Wave Astronomy, 46 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 231107 (2019)

  50. [51]

    Abadie et al

    J. Abadie et al. (LIGO Scientific), A Gravitational wave observatory operating beyond the quantum shot-noise limit: Squeezed light in application, Nature Phys. 7, 962 (2011), arXiv:1109.2295 [quant-ph]

  51. [52]

    Grote, K

    H. Grote, K. Danzmann, K. L. Dooley, R. Schnabel, J. Slutsky, and H. Vahlbruch, First Long-Term Appli- cation of Squeezed States of Light in a Gravitational- Wave Observatory, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 181101 (2013), arXiv:1302.2188 [physics.ins-det]

  52. [53]

    D. J. Ottaway, P. Fritschel, and S. J. Waldman, Impact of upconverted scattered light on advanced interfero- metric gravitational wave detectors, Opt. Express 20, 8329 (2012)

  53. [54]

    Aisa et al

    D. Aisa et al. , The Advanced Virgo monolithic fused silica suspension, Proceedings, 13th Pisa Meeting on Advanced Detectors : Frontier Detectors for Frontier Physics (FDFP 2015): La Biodola, Isola d’Elba, Italy, 2015, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A824 (2016)

  54. [55]

    L. Naticchioni (Virgo Collaboration), The payloads of Advanced Virgo: current status and upgrades, Proceed- ings, 12th Edoardo Amaldi Conference on Gravitational Waves (Amaldi 12): Pasadena, CA, USA, 2017 , J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 957, 012002 (2018)

  55. [56]

    Blom et al

    M. Blom et al. , Vertical and Horizontal Seismic Isola- tion Performance of the Advanced Virgo External In- jection Bench Seismic Attenuation System, Proceedings, 13th International Conference on Topics in Astroparti- cle and Underground Physics (TAUP 2013): Asilomar, CA, USA, 2013 , Phys. Procedia 61 (2015)

  56. [57]

    Blom, Seismic Attenuation for Advanced Virgo: Vibration Isolation for the External Injection Bench, Ph.D

    M. Blom, Seismic Attenuation for Advanced Virgo: Vibration Isolation for the External Injection Bench, Ph.D. Thesis, Nikhef (2015)

  57. [59]

    Rocchi et al

    A. Rocchi et al. , Thermal effects and their compen- sation in Advanced Virgo, Proceedings, 9th Edoardo Amaldi Conference on Gravitational Waves (Amaldi 9): Cardiff, United Kingdom, 2011, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.363, 012016 (2012)

  58. [60]

    I. Nardecchia et al., Integrated dynamical thermal com- pensation techniques for Advanced Virgo, in Proceed- ings, 2nd GRavitational-waves Science and technology Simposium (GRASS 2019): Padova, Italy, 2019 (2020)

  59. [61]

    Acernese et al

    F. Acernese et al. (Virgo Collaboration), Increasing the Astrophysical Reach of the Advanced Virgo Detector via the Application of Squeezed Vacuum States of Light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 231108 (2019)

  60. [62]

    Vahlbruch, M

    H. Vahlbruch, M. Mehmet, K. Danzmann, and R. Schn- abel, Detection of 15 dB Squeezed States of Light and their Application for the Absolute Calibration of Pho- toelectric Quantum Efficiency, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 110801 (2016)

  61. [63]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), A guide to LIGO–Virgo detector noise and extraction of transient gravitational-wave signals, Class. Quantum Grav. 37, 055002 (2020), arXiv:1908.11170 [gr-qc]

  62. [64]

    R. P. Fisher et al., DQSEGDB: A time-interval database for storing gravitational wave observatory metadata (2020), arXiv:2008.11316 [astro-ph.IM]

  63. [65]

    Christensen, P

    N. Christensen, P. Shawhan, and G. Gonzalez (LIGO Scientific), Vetoes for inspiral triggers in LIGO data, Class. Quantum Grav. 21, S1747 (2004), arXiv:gr- qc/0403114

  64. [66]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), Characterization of transient noise in Advanced LIGO relevant to gravitational wave signal GW150914, Class. Quantum Grav. 33, 134001 (2016), arXiv:1602.03844 [gr-qc]

  65. [67]

    Reconstructing the calibrated strain signal in the Advanced LIGO detectors

    A. Viets et al., Reconstructing the calibrated strain sig- nal in the Advanced LIGO detectors, Class. Quant. Grav. 35, 095015 (2018), arXiv:1710.09973 [astro- ph.IM]

  66. [68]

    Calibration of Ad- vanced Virgo and Reconstruction of the Gravitational Wave Signal h(t) during the Observing Run O2,

    F. Acernese et al. (Virgo), Calibration of Advanced Virgo and Reconstruction of the Gravitational Wave Signalh(t) during the Observing Run O2, Class. Quan- tum Grav. 35, 205004 (2018), arXiv:1807.03275 [gr-qc]

  67. [69]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Cal- ibration of the Advanced LIGO detectors for the discov- ery of the binary black-hole merger GW150914, Phys. Rev. D 95, 062003 (2017), arXiv:1602.03845 [gr-qc]

  68. [70]

    Tuyenbayev et al

    D. Tuyenbayev et al. , Improving LIGO calibration ac- curacy by tracking and compensating for slow tempo- ral variations, Class. Quant. Grav. 34, 015002 (2017), arXiv:1608.05134 [astro-ph.IM]

  69. [71]

    The Advanced LIGO Photon Calibrators

    S. Karki et al. , The Advanced LIGO Photon Cal- ibrators, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87, 114503 (2016), arXiv:1608.05055 [astro-ph.IM]

  70. [72]

    Bhattacharjee, Y

    D. Bhattacharjee, Y. Lecoeuche, S. Karki, J. Bet- zwieser, V. Bossilkov, S. Kandhasamy, E. Payne, and R. Savage, Fiducial displacements with improved accu- racy for the global network of gravitational wave detec- tors, Class. Quantum Grav. 10.1088/1361-6382/aba9ed (2020), arXiv:2006.00130 [astro-ph.IM]

  71. [73]

    Estevez, P

    D. Estevez, P. Lagabbe, A. Masserot, L. Rolland, M. Seglar-Arroyo, and D. Verkindt, The Advanced Virgo Photon Calibrators (2020), arXiv:2009.08103 [astro-ph.IM]

  72. [74]

    Sunet al., Classical Quantum Gravity37, 225008 (2020), 29 arXiv:2005.02531 [astro-ph.IM]

    L. Sun et al. , Characterization of systematic error in Advanced LIGO calibration, Class. Quant. Grav. 37, 225008 (2020), arXiv:2005.02531 [astro-ph.IM]

  73. [75]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), GW150914: First results from the search for binary black hole coalescence with Advanced LIGO, Phys. Rev. D 93, 122003 (2016), arXiv:1602.03839 [gr-qc]

  74. [76]

    Vitale, W

    S. Vitale, W. Del Pozzo, T. G. F. Li, C. Van Den Broeck, I. Mandel, B. Aylott, and J. Veitch, Effect of calibra- tion errors on Bayesian parameter estimation for grav- itational wave signals from inspiral binary systems in the Advanced Detectors era, Phys. Rev. D 85, 064034 (2012), arXiv:1111.3044 [gr-qc]

  75. [77]

    Estevez, B

    D. Estevez, B. Mours, L. Rolland, and D.Verkindt, On- line h(t) reconstruction for Virgo O3 data: start of O3 , Tech. Rep. VIR-0652B-19 (Virgo, 2019)

  76. [78]

    Improving the Sensitivity of Advanced LIGO Using Noise Subtraction

    D. Davis, T. J. Massinger, A. P. Lundgren, J. C. Driggers, A. L. Urban, and L. K. Nuttall, Improving the Sensitivity of Advanced LIGO Using Noise Sub- traction, Class. Quantum Grav. 36, 055011 (2019), arXiv:1809.05348 [astro-ph.IM]

  77. [79]

    Viets and M

    A. Viets and M. Wade, CSubtracting Narrow-band Noise from LIGO Strain Data in the Third Observing Run , Tech. Rep. T2100058 (LIGO DCC, 2021)

  78. [80]

    Vajente, Y

    G. Vajente, Y. Huang, M. Isi, J. C. Driggers, J. S. Kissel, M. J. Szczepanczyk, and S. Vitale, Machine-learning nonstationary noise out of gravitational-wave detectors, 47 Phys. Rev. D 101, 042003 (2020), arXiv:1911.09083 [gr- qc]

  79. [81]

    Rolland, M

    L. Rolland, M. Seglar-Arroyo, and D. Verkindt, Repro- cessing of h(t) for the last two weeks of O3a , Tech. Rep. VIR-1201A-19 (Virgo, 2019)

  80. [82]

    Davis et al

    D. Davis et al. , LIGO Detector Characterization in the Second and Third Observing Runs (2021), arXiv:2101.11673 [astro-ph.IM]

Showing first 80 references.