pith. sign in

arxiv: 2411.11846 · v2 · pith:HNUIKTZ5new · submitted 2024-11-18 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc· hep-ph· math.AG

Emergence of Calabi-Yau manifolds in high-precision black hole scattering

Mathias Driesse , Gustav Uhre Jakobsen , Albrecht Klemm , Gustav Mogull , Christoph Nega , Jan Plefka , Benjamin Sauer , Johann Usovitsch This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 18:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qchep-phmath.AG
keywords black hole scatteringpost-Minkowskian expansionCalabi-Yau manifoldsradiation reactionself-forceworldline quantum field theorygravitational wavesfour-loop integrals
0
0 comments X

The pith

Calabi-Yau three-fold periods emerge in the radiation sector of black hole scattering at 5PM-1SF order and contribute to radiated energy and recoil.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper performs a four-loop computation in the worldline quantum field theory formalism to obtain the radiation-reacted impulse, scattering angle, radiated energy, and recoil for classical black hole scattering at fifth post-Minkowskian and sub-leading self-force orders. Unlike the conservative sector, the radiation observables now contain periods of Calabi-Yau three-folds. A sympathetic reader cares because these advanced geometric structures appear in a purely classical general-relativistic process and may simplify or illuminate future high-precision calculations needed for gravitational-wave astronomy. The work also supplies the technical details of canonicalizing the differential equations, boundary integrations, and integration-by-parts reductions required for the result.

Core claim

In the radiation sector at 5PM-1SF, periods of Calabi-Yau three-folds appear and contribute to the radiated energy and recoil observables, as obtained from the worldline quantum field theory computation at four loops.

What carries the argument

The canonicalization of differential equations for the four-loop integrals in the worldline QFT radiation-reaction calculation.

If this is right

  • The radiated energy and recoil receive explicit contributions from Calabi-Yau three-fold periods.
  • Detailed integration-by-parts and differential-equation techniques are shown to be viable for radiation-reaction problems at four loops.
  • Direct comparisons between the analytic result and numerical relativity become possible at this precision.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The appearance of these periods may indicate that algebraic geometry supplies useful closed-form building blocks for higher-order gravitational observables.
  • Similar geometric structures could appear in radiation calculations at even higher post-Minkowskian orders.
  • Incorporating these periods into waveform models might improve accuracy for extreme-mass-ratio inspirals or scattering events.

Load-bearing premise

The worldline quantum field theory formalism together with the chosen regularization and boundary conditions fully captures the classical radiation reaction at four-loop order.

What would settle it

A numerical relativity simulation of black-hole scattering at the velocity and impact parameter corresponding to the 5PM-1SF regime that yields a different radiated energy or recoil after the conservative contribution is subtracted.

read the original abstract

Using the worldline quantum field theory formalism, we compute the radiation-reacted impulse, scattering angle, radiated energy and recoil of a classical black hole (or neutron star) scattering event at fifth post-Minkowskian and sub-leading self-force orders (5PM-1SF). This state-of-the-art four-loop computation employs advanced integration-by-parts and differential equation technology, and is considerably more challenging than the conservative 5PM-1SF counterpart. As compared with the conservative 5PM-1SF, in the radiation sector Calabi-Yau three-fold periods appear and contribute to the radiated energy and recoil observables. We give an extensive exposition of the canonicalization of the differential equations and provide details on boundary integrations, Feynman rules, and integration-by-parts strategies. Comparisons to numerical relativity are also performed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes the radiation-reacted impulse, scattering angle, radiated energy, and recoil for classical black hole (or neutron star) scattering at fifth post-Minkowskian and sub-leading self-force order (5PM-1SF) using the worldline quantum field theory formalism. This four-loop calculation applies integration-by-parts reduction to master integrals, canonicalizes the associated differential equations, and evaluates them with specified boundary conditions; it reports that Calabi-Yau three-fold periods appear in the radiation sector and contribute to the radiated energy and recoil observables. The paper supplies detailed expositions of the canonicalization procedure, boundary integrations, Feynman rules, and IBP strategies, together with comparisons to numerical relativity.

Significance. If the results hold, the work is significant because it extends high-precision post-Minkowskian computations into the radiation sector at four loops and demonstrates the emergence of Calabi-Yau three-fold periods as genuine contributions to classical observables. This advances the analytic understanding of radiative corrections in general relativity and may open connections between perturbative gravity and algebraic geometry. The explicit documentation of the differential-equation technology and boundary choices provides a useful technical resource for the community.

major comments (1)
  1. [§5] §5 (Boundary integrations for radiation-sector master integrals): the mapping from the chosen boundary conditions at the singular points of the canonical differential equations to the retarded classical on-shell radiation reaction is not fully explicit. While the integration procedure is described, an additional verification—such as a direct reduction to a known lower-order result or an explicit check that the selected solution branch reproduces the correct radiation-reaction sign and causality—would be required to confirm that the reported Calabi-Yau contributions are physical rather than artifacts of auxiliary boundary choices.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§4] The notation for the master-integral basis in the radiation sector could be cross-referenced more clearly to the IBP reduction tables to aid reproducibility.
  2. [§6] Figure captions for the numerical-relativity comparisons should state the precise post-Minkowskian order and self-force truncation used in each curve.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comment on the boundary integrations. We address the point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional explicit verification as suggested.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§5] §5 (Boundary integrations for radiation-sector master integrals): the mapping from the chosen boundary conditions at the singular points of the canonical differential equations to the retarded classical on-shell radiation reaction is not fully explicit. While the integration procedure is described, an additional verification—such as a direct reduction to a known lower-order result or an explicit check that the selected solution branch reproduces the correct radiation-reaction sign and causality—would be required to confirm that the reported Calabi-Yau contributions are physical rather than artifacts of auxiliary boundary choices.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee drawing attention to the need for greater explicitness in connecting the boundary conditions to the physical retarded radiation-reaction solution. In the current manuscript the boundary conditions at the singular points are chosen to enforce the retarded propagator structure and on-shell conditions appropriate to classical radiation reaction, with the integration contours selected to respect causality. To address the request for additional verification, we will revise §5 to include (i) an explicit reduction of the 5PM-1SF radiation-sector integrals to the known 4PM-1SF radiation-reacted results (where the same boundary prescription reproduces the established expressions) and (ii) a direct check that the leading Calabi-Yau period contribution carries the correct sign and satisfies the expected causality properties for the radiated energy and recoil. These additions will be accompanied by a short appendix tabulating the relevant boundary values and the resulting physical observables. We agree that this clarification will remove any ambiguity and confirm the physical nature of the reported contributions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Direct IBP reduction and DE integration yields Calabi-Yau periods without circular reduction to inputs

full rationale

The derivation proceeds by applying worldline QFT Feynman rules at four loops, performing IBP reduction to a basis of master integrals, canonicalizing the resulting differential equations, and integrating them subject to boundary conditions chosen to match the classical retarded radiation reaction. The Calabi-Yau three-fold periods appear as solutions to these differential equations; they are not fitted parameters, not defined in terms of the target observables, and not justified solely by self-citation. The mapping from master-integral boundaries to physical observables is stated explicitly and is independent of the final numerical values. No step reduces the reported contributions to a tautology or to a prior fit by the same authors.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on the standard assumptions of perturbative quantum field theory on a worldline, the validity of the post-Minkowskian expansion, and the correctness of the chosen integration-by-parts reduction and differential-equation boundary conditions. No free parameters fitted to data or new postulated entities are indicated in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Worldline quantum field theory correctly reproduces classical general relativity at the orders considered
    Invoked throughout the computation of impulse and radiation observables
  • standard math Integration-by-parts identities and differential equations reduce the four-loop integrals to a basis whose periods can be evaluated
    Central to obtaining the Calabi-Yau periods

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5697 in / 1339 out tokens · 26554 ms · 2026-05-21T18:25:59.851895+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 21 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Nonlocal-in-time tail effects in gravitational scattering to fifth Post-Minkowskian and tenth self-force orders

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Nonlocal-in-time conservative tail contributions to gravitational scattering are derived at 5PM and 10SF orders, expressed via polylogarithms up to weight three and agreeing with prior results through 6PN.

  2. The spectrum of Feynman-integral geometries at two loops

    hep-th 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Two-loop Feynman integrals involve Riemann spheres, elliptic curves, hyperelliptic curves of genus 2 and 3, K3 surfaces, and a rationalizable Del Pezzo surface of degree 2.

  3. Integrand Analysis, Leading Singularities and Canonical Bases beyond Polylogarithms

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Feynman integrals selected for unit leading singularities in complex geometries satisfy epsilon-factorized differential equations with new transcendental functions corresponding to periods and differential forms in th...

  4. The gravitational Compton amplitude at third post-Minkowskian order

    hep-th 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Gravitational Compton amplitude computed to third post-Minkowskian order via worldline EFT with infrared and forward divergences regulated to connect to black hole perturbation theory.

  5. Resumming Scattering Amplitudes for Waveforms

    hep-th 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A new projector-based formalism determines effective potentials from perturbative amplitudes and resums them to compute non-perturbative gravitational waveforms for generic two-body trajectories.

  6. A construction of single-valued elliptic polylogarithms

    hep-th 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A construction of single-valued elliptic polylogarithms on the punctured elliptic curve is given that reduces to Brown's genus-zero condition upon torus degeneration.

  7. Analytic structure of the high-energy gravitational amplitude: multi-H diagrams and classical 5PM logarithms

    hep-th 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Computes the leading double logarithm at 5PM in the high-energy gravitational amplitude via multi-H diagrams and dispersion relations, extracting the single-log imaginary part of the eikonal phase.

  8. Hidden simplicity in the scattering for neutron stars and black holes

    hep-th 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Authors define Kerr generating functions for all-loop scattering on Kerr black holes and apply them to compute leading non-linear tidal effects of neutron stars up to four loops in gravity.

  9. The Classical Gravitational Impulse at High Energies

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The gravitational impulse for ultrarelativistic massive scalars is resummed to all orders in G_N at fixed G_N s/mb, recovering post-Minkowski results and predicting the leading high-energy behavior to eleventh post-Mi...

  10. A Runway to Dissipation of Angular Momentum via Worldline Quantum Field Theory

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The authors introduce static correlators in worldline QFT to compute angular momentum dissipation in black hole scattering, reproducing the known O(G^3) flux and extending the approach to electromagnetism at O(α^3).

  11. Black Hole Response Theory and its Exact Shockwave Limit

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Black hole response theory in WQFT exactly reproduces the Aichelburg-Sexl shockwave metric, geodesics, and the transfer matrix for gravitational-wave scattering off it via post-Minkowskian resummation.

  12. All-order structure of static gravitational interactions and the seventh post-Newtonian potential

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A closed formula computes static post-Newtonian corrections at arbitrary odd orders in gravity, yielding the explicit seventh post-Newtonian potential that matches an independent diagrammatic method.

  13. Black Hole Dynamics at Fifth Post-Newtonian Order

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Derives 5PN scattering observables and a conservative Hamiltonian contribution for black holes that determines EOB parameters d5loc and a6loc.

  14. Picard-Fuchs Equations of Twisted Differential forms associated to Feynman Integrals

    math.AG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    An extension of the Griffiths-Dwork algorithm produces twisted Picard-Fuchs operators for hypergeometric, elliptic, and Calabi-Yau motives from families of Feynman integrals.

  15. Fano and Reflexive Polytopes from Feynman Integrals

    hep-th 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Quasi-finite Feynman integrals produce sparse Fano and reflexive polytopes that encode degenerate Calabi-Yau varieties and link to del Pezzo surfaces, K3 surfaces, and Calabi-Yau threefolds.

  16. Heterotic Footprints in Classical Gravity: PM dynamics from On-Shell soft amplitudes at one loop

    hep-th 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Derives conservative potential and scattering angle for charged black holes in EMD theory via one-loop soft amplitudes, showing IR finiteness after Lippmann-Schwinger treatment and smooth reduction to GR.

  17. Unexpected Symmetries of Kerr Black Hole Scattering

    hep-th 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The work establishes conservation of several quantities in Kerr black hole scattering and presents evidence that a spinning probe satisfies asymptotic integrability to quartic spin order at all post-Minkowskian orders.

  18. Towards Motivic Coactions at Genus One from Zeta Generators

    hep-th 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Proposes motivic coaction formulae for genus-one iterated integrals over holomorphic Eisenstein series using zeta generators, verifies expected coaction properties, and deduces f-alphabet decompositions of multiple mo...

  19. A complex-linear reformulation of Hamilton-Jacobi theory and emergent quantum structure

    quant-ph 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Embedding classical Hamilton-Jacobi amplitude and phase into a complex field yields a linear equation from which quantum mechanics emerges structurally when the real part of a scaling parameter is nonzero.

  20. Gravitational radiation from hyperbolic orbits: comparison between self-force, post-Minkowskian, post-Newtonian, and numerical relativity results

    gr-qc 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Self-force calculations of radiated gravitational wave energy from hyperbolic orbits around Schwarzschild black holes agree with post-Minkowskian results for large impact parameters and velocities up to 0.7c, with fur...

  21. The Science of the Einstein Telescope

    gr-qc 2025-03

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

117 extracted references · 117 canonical work pages · cited by 21 Pith papers · 33 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Naively, one can understand this splitting as a decomposition of the maximal cuts of the CY3 sector into their leading singularities and pure parts

    We split the Wronskian matrix into a semi-simple and unipotent part W = W ss·W u. Naively, one can understand this splitting as a decomposition of the maximal cuts of the CY3 sector into their leading singularities and pure parts. The unipotent part is named after the unipotent differential equation it fulfills: (d − Au(x))W u(x) = 0 , (14) where Au(x) is...

    work page

  2. [2]

    We rotate our integrals with the inverse of W ss, which strips them of their leading singularities. (The analagous operation for K3 is normalizing I1 with the K3 period ϖK3, leaving only the pure part.) To parametrize all degrees of freedom in W ss of a CY3, one needs the holomorphic solution ϖ0, an additional function α1 = ϖ2 0 x(ϖ0ϖ′ 1 − ϖ′ 0ϖ1) , (15) ...

    work page

  3. [4]

    tail-of-tail

    The type of propagator above the loop. This is typically a worldline ω or a graviton bubble g, but it can also be more sophisticated, such as a “tail-of-tail” bubble

    work page

  4. [5]

    This could be Feynman (nothing), retarded (+), advanced ( −), or a −i times a cut propagator ( ×)

    The direction of the propagator, which we specify as a subscript to a propagator. This could be Feynman (nothing), retarded (+), advanced ( −), or a −i times a cut propagator ( ×)

    work page

  5. [6]

    for free

    The number of “jumps”, as a subscript to M. For brevity, this is omitted when there are no jumps. FIG. 3. The M, M1, and M2 families, with zero, one, and two jumps, respectively. In this notation, the cut identity −iδ−(x) = 1 x + i0+ − 1 x − i0+ (S.48) can be re-expressed as M[. . . , ω×, . . .] = M[. . . , ω+, . . .] − M[. . . , ω−, . . .] . (S.49) In th...

    work page

  6. [7]

    ¨Uber Gravitationswellen

    Einstein, A. ¨Uber Gravitationswellen. Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys. ) 1918, 154– 167 (1918)

    work page 1918

  7. [8]

    Kovacs, S. J. & Thorne, K. S. The Generation of Grav- itational Waves. 4. Bremsstrahlung. Astrophys. J. 224, 62–85 (1978)

    work page 1978

  8. [9]

    Abbott, R. et al. GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coales- cences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run. Phys. Rev. X 13, 041039 (2023). 2111.03606

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  9. [10]

    & Haster, C.-J

    P¨ urrer, M. & Haster, C.-J. Gravitational waveform ac- curacy requirements for future ground-based detectors. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023151 (2020). 1912.10055

    work page arXiv 2020

  10. [11]

    Evolution of Binary Black Hole Spacetimes

    Pretorius, F. Evolution of binary black hole spacetimes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 121101 (2005). gr-qc/0507014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  11. [12]

    Damour, T. et al. Strong-Field Scattering of Two Black Holes: Numerics Versus Analytics. Phys. Rev. D 89, 081503 (2014). 1402.7307

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  12. [13]

    Boyle, M. et al. The SXS Collaboration catalog of bi- nary black hole simulations. Class. Quant. Grav. 36, 195006 (2019). 1904.04831

    work page arXiv 2019

  13. [14]

    Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves

    Blanchet, L. Gravitational Radiation from Post- Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries. Living Rev. Rel. 17, 2 (2014). 1310.1528

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  14. [15]

    Porto, R. A. The effective field theorist’s approach to gravitational dynamics. Phys. Rept. 633, 1–104 (2016). 1601.04914

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  15. [16]

    Effective Field Theories of Post-Newtonian Gravity: A comprehensive review

    Levi, M. Effective Field Theories of Post-Newtonian Gravity: A comprehensive review. Rept. Prog. Phys. 83, 075901 (2020). 1807.01699

    work page arXiv 2020

  16. [17]

    & Steinhoff, J

    Mogull, G., Plefka, J. & Steinhoff, J. Classical black hole scattering from a worldline quantum field theory. JHEP 02, 048 (2021). 2010.02865

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [18]

    A., Monteiro, R

    Kosower, D. A., Monteiro, R. & O’Connell, D. The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes Chapter 14: Classical gravity from scattering amplitudes. J. Phys. A 55, 443015 (2022). 2203.13025

    work page arXiv 2022

  18. [19]

    Bjerrum-Bohr, N. E. J., Damgaard, P. H., Plante, L. & Vanhove, P. The SAGEX review on scattering ampli- tudes Chapter 13: Post-Minkowskian expansion from scattering amplitudes. J. Phys. A 55, 443014 (2022). 2203.13024

    work page arXiv 2022

  19. [20]

    Buonanno, A. et al. Snowmass White Paper: Gravita- tional Waves and Scattering Amplitudes. In Snowmass 2021 (2022). 2204.05194

    work page arXiv 2021

  20. [21]

    & Veneziano, G

    Di Vecchia, P., Heissenberg, C., Russo, R. & Veneziano, G. The gravitational eikonal: from particle, string and brane collisions to black-hole encounters (2023). 2306.16488

    work page arXiv 2023

  21. [22]

    Abbott, B. P. et al. Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016). 1602.03837

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  22. [23]

    Amaro-Seoane, P. et al. Laser Interferometer Space An- tenna (2017). 1702.00786

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  23. [24]

    Punturo, M. et al. The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory. Class. Quant. Grav. 27, 194002 (2010)

    work page 2010

  24. [25]

    Ballmer, S. W. et al. Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier White Paper: Future Gravitational-Wave Detector Fa- cilities. In Snowmass 2021 (2022). 2203.08228

    work page arXiv 2021

  25. [26]

    The motion of point particles in curved spacetime

    Poisson, E., Pound, A. & Vega, I. The Motion of point particles in curved spacetime. Living Rev. Rel. 14, 7 (2011). 1102.0529

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  26. [27]

    Self-force and radiation reaction in general relativity

    Barack, L. & Pound, A. Self-force and radiation reac- tion in general relativity. Rept. Prog. Phys. 82, 016904 (2019). 1805.10385

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  27. [28]

    Gralla, S. E. & Lobo, K. Self-force effects in post- Minkowskian scattering. Class. Quant. Grav. 39, 095001 (2022). 2110.08681

    work page arXiv 2022

  28. [29]

    & Porto, R

    K¨ alin, G. & Porto, R. A. From Boundary Data to Bound States. JHEP 01, 072 (2020). 1910.03008

    work page arXiv 2020

  29. [30]

    & Pompili, L

    Buonanno, A., Mogull, G., Patil, R. & Pompili, L. Post- Minkowskian Theory Meets the Spinning Effective-One- Body Approach for Bound-Orbit Waveforms (2024). 26 2405.19181

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [31]

    & Porto, R

    K¨ alin, G. & Porto, R. A. Post-Minkowskian Effective Field Theory for Conservative Binary Dynamics. JHEP 11, 106 (2020). 2006.01184

    work page arXiv 2020

  31. [32]

    High-Speed Scattering of Charged and Uncharged Particles in General Relativity

    Westpfahl, K. High-Speed Scattering of Charged and Uncharged Particles in General Relativity. Fortsch. Phys. 33, 417–493 (1985)

    work page 1985

  32. [33]

    High-energy gravitational scattering and the general relativistic two-body problem

    Damour, T. High-energy gravitational scattering and the general relativistic two-body problem. Phys. Rev. D 97, 044038 (2018). 1710.10599

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [34]

    Goldberger, W. D. & Rothstein, I. Z. An Effective field theory of gravity for extended objects. Phys. Rev. D 73, 104029 (2006). hep-th/0409156

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  34. [35]

    Bern, Z. et al. Scattering Amplitudes and the Conser- vative Hamiltonian for Binary Systems at Third Post- Minkowskian Order. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 201603 (2019). 1901.04424

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  35. [36]

    Classical and quantum scattering in post- Minkowskian gravity

    Damour, T. Classical and quantum scattering in post- Minkowskian gravity. Phys. Rev. D 102, 024060 (2020). 1912.02139

    work page arXiv 2020

  36. [37]

    & Porto, R

    K¨ alin, G., Liu, Z. & Porto, R. A. Conservative Dynam- ics of Binary Systems to Third Post-Minkowskian Order from the Effective Field Theory Approach. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 261103 (2020). 2007.04977

    work page arXiv 2020

  37. [38]

    & Veneziano, G

    Di Vecchia, P., Heissenberg, C., Russo, R. & Veneziano, G. The eikonal approach to gravitational scattering and radiation at O(G3). JHEP 07, 169 (2021). 2104.03256

    work page arXiv 2021

  38. [39]

    Bern, Z. et al. Scattering Amplitudes, the Tail Effect, and Conservative Binary Dynamics at O(G4). Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 161103 (2022). 2112.10750

    work page arXiv 2022

  39. [40]

    & Porto, R

    Dlapa, C., K¨ alin, G., Liu, Z. & Porto, R. A. Con- servative Dynamics of Binary Systems at Fourth Post- Minkowskian Order in the Large-Eccentricity Expan- sion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 161104 (2022). 2112.11296

    work page arXiv 2022

  40. [41]

    & Porto, R

    Dlapa, C., K¨ alin, G., Liu, Z., Neef, J. & Porto, R. A. Radiation Reaction and Gravitational Waves at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 101401 (2023). 2210.05541

    work page arXiv 2023

  41. [42]

    H., Hansen, E

    Damgaard, P. H., Hansen, E. R., Plant´ e, L. & Van- hove, P. Classical observables from the exponential rep- resentation of the gravitational S-matrix. JHEP 09, 183 (2023). 2307.04746

    work page arXiv 2023

  42. [43]

    U., Mogull, G., Plefka, J

    Jakobsen, G. U., Mogull, G., Plefka, J. & Sauer, B. Dissipative Scattering of Spinning Black Holes at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 241402 (2023). 2308.11514

    work page arXiv 2023

  43. [44]

    Higgs boson gluon-fusion production in N3LO QCD

    Anastasiou, C., Duhr, C., Dulat, F., Herzog, F. & Mistl- berger, B. Higgs Boson Gluon-Fusion Production in QCD at Three Loops. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 212001 (2015). 1503.06056

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  44. [45]

    P., Kerner, M

    Jones, S. P., Kerner, M. & Luisoni, G. Next-to- Leading-Order QCD Corrections to Higgs Boson Plus Jet Production with Full Top-Quark Mass Depen- dence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 162001 (2018). [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 128, 059901 (2022)], 1802.00349

    work page arXiv 2018

  45. [46]

    Chen, X. et al. Fully Differential Higgs Boson Produc- tion to Third Order in QCD. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 072002 (2021). 2102.07607

    work page arXiv 2021

  46. [47]

    Lee, R. N. et al. Quark and Gluon Form Factors in Four-Loop QCD. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 212002 (2022). 2202.04660

    work page arXiv 2022

  47. [48]

    Periods and Feynman integrals

    Bogner, C. & Weinzierl, S. Periods and Feynman inte- grals. J. Math. Phys. 50, 042302 (2009). 0711.4863

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  48. [49]

    The physics and the mixed Hodge structure of Feynman integrals

    Vanhove, P. The physics and the mixed Hodge structure of Feynman integrals. Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 88, 161– 194 (2014). 1401.6438

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  49. [50]

    A (Bounded) Bestiary of Feynman Integral Calabi-Yau Geometries

    Bourjaily, J. L., McLeod, A. J., von Hippel, M. & Wilhelm, M. Bounded Collection of Feynman Integral Calabi-Yau Geometries. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 031601 (2019). 1810.07689

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  50. [51]

    & Nega, C

    B¨ onisch, K., Duhr, C., Fischbach, F., Klemm, A. & Nega, C. Feynman integrals in dimensional regulariza- tion and extensions of Calabi-Yau motives. JHEP 09, 156 (2022). 2108.05310

    work page arXiv 2022

  51. [52]

    Bourjaily, J. L. et al. Functions Beyond Multiple Poly- logarithms for Precision Collider Physics. In Snowmass 2021 (2022). 2203.07088

    work page arXiv 2021

  52. [53]

    & Sa- fari, R

    B¨ onisch, K., Fischbach, F., Klemm, A., Nega, C. & Sa- fari, R. Analytic structure of all loop banana integrals. JHEP 05, 066 (2021). 2008.10574

    work page arXiv 2021

  53. [54]

    & Porkert, F

    Duhr, C., Klemm, A., Loebbert, F., Nega, C. & Porkert, F. Yangian-Invariant Fishnet Integrals in Two Dimen- sions as Volumes of Calabi-Yau Varieties. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 041602 (2023). 2209.05291

    work page arXiv 2023

  54. [55]

    Yau, S. T. On the Ricci curvature of a compact K¨ ahler manifold and the complex Monge-Amp´ ere equation. I. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 31, 339–411 (1978)

    work page 1978

  55. [56]

    Lectures on K3 surfaces , vol

    Huybrechts, D. Lectures on K3 surfaces , vol. 158 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2016). URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316594193

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781316594193 2016

  56. [57]

    T., Strominger, A

    Candelas, P., Horowitz, G. T., Strominger, A. & Wit- ten, E. Vacuum configurations for superstrings. Nucl. Phys. B 258, 46–74 (1985)

    work page 1985

  57. [58]

    & Plefka, J

    Klemm, A., Nega, C., Sauer, B. & Plefka, J. Calabi-Yau periods for black hole scattering in classical general rel- ativity. Phys. Rev. D 109, 124046 (2024). 2401.07899

    work page arXiv 2024

  58. [59]

    Driesse, M. et al. Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and First Self-Force Order. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 241402 (2024). 2403.07781

    work page arXiv 2024

  59. [60]

    Gehrmann, T. et al. Graded transcendental functions: an application to four-point amplitudes with one off- shell leg. JHEP 12, 215 (2025). 2410.19088

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [61]

    & Weinzierl, S

    Duhr, C., Gasparotto, F., Nega, C., Tancredi, L. & Weinzierl, S. On the electron self-energy to three loops in QED. JHEP 11, 020 (2024). 2408.05154

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [62]

    & Schnetz, O

    Brown, F. & Schnetz, O. A K3 in ϕ4. Duke Math. J. 161, 1817–1862 (2012). URL https://doi.org/10. 1215/00127094-1644201

    work page 2012

  62. [63]

    U., Mogull, G., Plefka, J

    Jakobsen, G. U., Mogull, G., Plefka, J. & Sauer, B. All things retarded: radiation-reaction in worldline quan- tum field theory. JHEP 10, 128 (2022). 2207.00569

    work page arXiv 2022

  63. [64]

    Boulware, D. G. & Brown, L. S. Tree Graphs and Clas- sical Fields. Phys. Rev. 172, 1628–1631 (1968)

    work page 1968

  64. [65]

    & Zagier, D

    B¨ onisch, K., Klemm, A., Scheidegger, E. & Zagier, D. D-brane masses at special fibres of hypergeomet- ric families of Calabi-Yau threefolds, modular forms, and periods. Comm. Math. Phys. 405, Paper No. 134, 71 (2024). URL https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00220-024-05006-6

    work page 2024

  65. [66]

    M., Schmidt, P

    Rettegno, P., Pratten, G., Thomas, L. M., Schmidt, P. & Damour, T. Strong-field scattering of two spin- ning black holes: Numerical relativity versus post- Minkowskian gravity.Phys. Rev. D 108, 124016 (2023). 2307.06999

    work page arXiv 2023

  66. [67]

    & Rettegno, P

    Damour, T. & Rettegno, P. Strong-field scattering of two black holes: Numerical relativity meets post- Minkowskian gravity.Phys. Rev. D 107, 064051 (2023). 27 2211.01399

    work page arXiv 2023

  67. [68]

    Buonanno, A., Jakobsen, G. U. & Mogull, G. Post- Minkowskian Theory Meets the Spinning Effective- One-Body Approach for Two-Body Scattering (2024). 2402.12342

    work page arXiv 2024

  68. [69]

    U., Mogull, G., Plefka, J

    Jakobsen, G. U., Mogull, G., Plefka, J. & Steinhoff, J. SUSY in the sky with gravitons. JHEP 01, 027 (2022). 2109.04465

    work page arXiv 2022

  69. [70]

    Driesse, M. et al. High-precision black hole scattering with Calabi-Yau manifolds (2024). URL https://doi. org/10.5281/zenodo.14604438. Zenodo

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.14604438 2024

  70. [71]

    U., Mogull, G., Plefka, J., Sauer, B

    Jakobsen, G. U., Mogull, G., Plefka, J., Sauer, B. & Xu, Y. Conservative Scattering of Spinning Black Holes at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 151401 (2023). 2306.01714

    work page arXiv 2023

  71. [72]

    Tkachov, F. V. A theorem on analytical calculability of 4-loop renormalization group functions. Phys. Lett. B 100, 65–68 (1981)

    work page 1981

  72. [73]

    Chetyrkin, K. G. & Tkachov, F. V. Integration by parts: The algorithm to calculate β-functions in 4 loops. Nucl. Phys. B 192, 159–204 (1981)

    work page 1981

  73. [74]

    High-precision calculation of multi-loop Feynman integrals by difference equations

    Laporta, S. High-precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15, 5087–5159 (2000). hep-ph/0102033

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  74. [75]

    Kira - A Feynman Integral Reduction Program

    Maierh¨ ofer, P., Usovitsch, J. & Uwer, P. Kira—A Feyn- man integral reduction program. Comput. Phys. Com- mun. 230, 99–112 (2018). 1705.05610

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  75. [76]

    Integral Reduction with Kira 2.0 and Finite Field Methods

    Klappert, J., Lange, F., Maierh¨ ofer, P. & Usovitsch, J. Integral reduction with Kira 2.0 and finite field meth- ods. Comput. Phys. Commun. 266, 108024 (2021). 2008.06494

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  76. [77]

    & Lange, F

    Klappert, J. & Lange, F. Reconstructing rational func- tions with FireFly. Comput. Phys. Commun. 247, 106951 (2020). 1904.00009

    work page arXiv 2020

  77. [78]

    Klappert, J., Klein, S. Y. & Lange, F. Interpolation of dense and sparse rational functions and other improve- ments in FireFly. Comput. Phys. Commun. 264, 107968 (2021). 2004.01463

    work page arXiv 2021

  78. [79]

    Kotikov, A. V. Differential equations method: New technique for massive Feynman diagrams calculation. Phys. Lett. B 254, 158–164 (1991)

    work page 1991

  79. [80]

    Differential Equations for Two-Loop Four-Point Functions

    Gehrmann, T. & Remiddi, E. Differential equations for two loop four point functions. Nucl. Phys. B 580, 485– 518 (2000). hep-ph/9912329

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  80. [81]

    Henn, J. M. Multiloop integrals in dimensional regu- larization made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 251601 (2013). 1304.1806

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

Showing first 80 references.