pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.17786 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-19 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Quasinormal modes of rotating black holes beyond general relativity in the WKB approximation

Ruijing Tang , Nicola Franchini , Sebastian H. V\"olkel , Emanuele Berti
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 20:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords quasinormal modesrotating black holesWKB approximationmodified gravityblack hole spectroscopygravitational wave ringdownhigher-derivative gravity
0
0 comments X

The pith

The higher-order WKB method accurately computes quasinormal modes for rotating black holes in theories beyond general relativity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper demonstrates that the Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin approximation, carried to higher orders, can be extended from nonrotating cases to compute the ringing frequencies and damping times of spinning black holes when gravity deviates from general relativity. The authors first benchmark the method against continued-fraction results for Kerr black holes in standard gravity. They then apply it to parametrized deviations from the Teukolsky equation and to explicit higher-derivative gravity models, showing that the resulting frequencies remain reliable enough to interpret the loudest ringdown signal recorded to date. A sympathetic reader would see this as a practical computational bridge that lets observers test strong-field gravity with existing gravitational-wave data without solving the full field equations numerically for each new theory.

Core claim

The higher-order WKB approximation yields quasinormal-mode frequencies for rotating black holes in beyond-GR theories that remain more accurate than the measurement uncertainties reported for GW250114, the event with the highest ringdown signal-to-noise ratio observed so far.

What carries the argument

Higher-order Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin (WKB) approximation applied to the radial and angular equations governing quasinormal modes of rotating black holes.

If this is right

  • Black-hole spectroscopy becomes feasible for a broad class of modified-gravity models using only modest computational resources.
  • Predicted ringdown spectra in parametrized and higher-derivative theories can be compared directly with current gravitational-wave catalogs.
  • The same WKB pipeline can be reused for any new beyond-GR background once the effective potential is known.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the accuracy persists for higher overtones and near-extremal spins, the method could constrain additional parameters in future high-signal events.
  • Discrepancies between WKB and exact methods in new theories would flag the regimes where the approximation needs improvement or resummation.
  • The approach could be adapted to compute other strong-field observables such as photon-ring frequencies or shadow sizes in the same modified backgrounds.

Load-bearing premise

The WKB approximation remains sufficiently accurate for rotating black holes in the chosen beyond-GR parametrizations without large uncontrolled errors from truncation or background metric assumptions.

What would settle it

A direct comparison in which the WKB frequency for a dominant mode of a rotating beyond-GR black hole differs from a continued-fraction or linearized result by more than the observational error bars of GW250114.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.17786 by Emanuele Berti, Nicola Franchini, Ruijing Tang, Sebastian H. V\"olkel.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Comparison between WKB approximations (1st to 4th order) and Leaver’s spectral method values for a Kerr BH when [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Comparison of the linear coefficients [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Percentage relative error on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Comparison of QNM relative differences [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Exploring gravitational theories beyond general relativity (GR) with black hole (BH) spectroscopy requires accurate and flexible methods for computing their quasinormal mode (QNM) spectrum. A popular method of choice is the higher-order Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin (WKB) approximation, mostly applied to nonrotating BHs. While previous studies demonstrated that the higher-order WKB method can also be used for Kerr BHs in GR, there has been little work on rotating BHs in modified theories of gravity. In this work, we revive the idea by extending WKB calculations of the Kerr QNM spectrum to higher order and assessing its accuracy against continued-fraction tabulated data. We then apply the WKB approximation beyond GR, comparing it against both linearized and continued fraction calculations in the parametrized beyond-Teukolsky formalism and in higher-derivative gravity (HDG) theories. We find that the frequencies computed by the WKB method in theories beyond GR have better accuracy than the measurement errors for GW250114, the event with the highest ringdown signal-to-noise ratio observed to date.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends the higher-order WKB approximation to quasinormal modes of rotating (Kerr) black holes, first validating it against continued-fraction results in GR and then applying it to parametrized beyond-Teukolsky and higher-derivative gravity theories. It concludes that the resulting frequencies in these beyond-GR models achieve accuracy better than the ringdown measurement uncertainties reported for GW250114.

Significance. If the numerical comparisons hold, the work supplies a flexible, semi-analytic tool for black-hole spectroscopy in modified gravity that can be applied to rotating backgrounds without requiring full numerical integration of the perturbation equations. The explicit benchmarking against continued-fraction data in both GR and beyond-GR cases is a concrete strength that supports the claim of controlled truncation error.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (GR validation): the manuscript reports agreement between higher-order WKB and continued-fraction frequencies, but does not tabulate the absolute or relative errors as a function of spin a/M for the l=2, m=±2 modes that dominate the GW250114 ringdown; without these numbers the extrapolation to beyond-GR accuracy cannot be directly verified.
  2. [§5] §5 (beyond-GR applications): the claim that WKB errors are smaller than GW250114 measurement uncertainties is load-bearing for the central result, yet the text does not specify the precise WKB order retained or the maximum deviation observed in the HDG and parametrized beyond-Teukolsky cases for the relevant overtone and angular indices.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Notation] The notation for the WKB expansion order (n) and the continued-fraction truncation should be unified between the GR validation and beyond-GR sections to prevent reader confusion.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the frequency comparisons should include the exact spin values and mode indices used, rather than generic labels.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and constructive comments. We address the two major points below and will make the requested clarifications in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §4 (GR validation): the manuscript reports agreement between higher-order WKB and continued-fraction frequencies, but does not tabulate the absolute or relative errors as a function of spin a/M for the l=2, m=±2 modes that dominate the GW250114 ringdown; without these numbers the extrapolation to beyond-GR accuracy cannot be directly verified.

    Authors: We agree that explicit tabulation of the errors would strengthen the validation and allow direct verification. In the revised §4 we will add a table (or expanded figure caption) reporting both absolute and relative differences between the higher-order WKB and continued-fraction results for the l=2, m=±2, n=0 modes over the full range of spin a/M relevant to GW250114. This addition will make the GR benchmark fully transparent and support the subsequent extrapolation to modified-gravity cases. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §5 (beyond-GR applications): the claim that WKB errors are smaller than GW250114 measurement uncertainties is load-bearing for the central result, yet the text does not specify the precise WKB order retained or the maximum deviation observed in the HDG and parametrized beyond-Teukolsky cases for the relevant overtone and angular indices.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript would benefit from greater explicitness on these quantities. In the revised §5 we will state the precise WKB order retained throughout the calculations and report the maximum relative deviations found in the HDG and parametrized beyond-Teukolsky comparisons for the overtones and angular indices relevant to the GW250114 ringdown. These numbers will be placed directly alongside the comparison to the reported measurement uncertainties, thereby making the accuracy claim fully verifiable. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; validation uses independent continued-fraction benchmarks

full rationale

The paper extends higher-order WKB to rotating BHs in parametrized beyond-Teukolsky and HDG theories, then directly compares results to continued-fraction calculations (both linearized and tabulated) to quantify truncation error. This supplies an external numerical benchmark rather than a self-referential fit or definition. The accuracy claim relative to GW250114 uncertainties therefore rests on these independent tests. Minor self-citations to prior WKB work on Kerr GR exist but are not load-bearing for the central beyond-GR validation step.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach relies on the standard validity of the WKB expansion for wave equations on black hole backgrounds and on the parametrized beyond-Teukolsky formalism being a faithful effective description; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Higher-order WKB approximation converges for the quasinormal mode problem on rotating black hole backgrounds in both GR and the considered modified theories.
    Invoked when extending the method from non-rotating to rotating cases and when claiming accuracy for beyond-GR models.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5503 in / 1400 out tokens · 19212 ms · 2026-05-16T20:43:13.333777+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Confronting eikonal and post-Kerr methods with numerical evolution of scalar field perturbations in spacetimes beyond Kerr

    gr-qc 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Numerical simulations benchmark the eikonal and post-Kerr approximations for quasinormal modes in deformed Kerr spacetimes, quantifying their errors relative to expected observational precision.

  2. Quasinormal mode/grey-body factor correspondence for Kerr black holes

    gr-qc 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0

    WKB analysis of the Teukolsky equation establishes a quasinormal-mode to greybody-factor correspondence for Kerr black holes that holds in the eikonal limit for gravitational perturbations and matches numerics at high...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 27 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neu- tron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GWTC- 1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs, Phys. Rev. X9, 031040 (2019), arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scien- tific), GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run, Phys. Rev. X13, 041039 (2023), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run, Phys. Rev. X11, 021053 (2021), arXiv:2010.14527 [gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Tests of general relativity with GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 221101 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 129902 (2018)], arXiv:1602.03841 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Tests of General Relativity with the Binary Black Hole Signals from the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1, Phys. Rev. D 100, 104036 (2019), arXiv:1903.04467 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    R.Abbottet al.(LIGOScientific, Virgo),Testsofgeneral relativity with binary black holes from the second LIGO- Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog, Phys. Rev. D 103, 122002 (2021), arXiv:2010.14529 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  9. [9]

    Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3, (2021), arXiv:2112.06861 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    Evolution of Binary Black Hole Spacetimes

    F. Pretorius, Evolution of binary black hole spacetimes, Phys.Rev.Lett.95,121101(2005),arXiv:gr-qc/0507014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  11. [11]

    Inspiral, merger and ring-down of equal-mass black-hole binaries

    A. Buonanno, G. B. Cook, and F. Pretorius, Inspiral, merger and ring-down of equal-mass black-hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D75, 124018 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0610122

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  12. [12]

    Inspiral, merger and ringdown of unequal mass black hole binaries: a multipolar analysis

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, J. A. Gonzalez, U. Sperhake, M. Hannam, S. Husa, and B. Bruegmann, Inspiral, merger and ringdown of unequal mass black hole bina- ries: A Multipolar analysis, Phys. Rev. D76, 064034 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0703053

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  13. [13]

    F. J. Zerilli, Effective potential for even parity Regge- Wheelergravitationalperturbationequations,Phys.Rev. Lett.24, 737 (1970)

    work page 1970

  14. [14]

    Regge and J

    T. Regge and J. A. Wheeler, Stability of a Schwarzschild singularity, Phys. Rev.108, 1063 (1957)

    work page 1957

  15. [15]

    S. A. Teukolsky, Rotating black holes - separable wave equations for gravitational and electromagnetic pertur- bations, Phys. Rev. Lett.29, 1114 (1972)

    work page 1972

  16. [16]

    S. A. Teukolsky, Perturbations of a rotating black hole. 1. Fundamental equations for gravitational electromagnetic and neutrino field perturbations, Astrophys. J.185, 635 (1973)

    work page 1973

  17. [17]

    R. P. Kerr, Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 237 (1963)

    work page 1963

  18. [18]

    Carter, Axisymmetric Black Hole Has Only Two De- grees of Freedom, Phys

    B. Carter, Axisymmetric Black Hole Has Only Two De- grees of Freedom, Phys. Rev. Lett.26, 331 (1971)

    work page 1971

  19. [19]

    D. C. Robinson, Uniqueness of the Kerr black hole, Phys. Rev. Lett.34, 905 (1975). 10 5 × 10-5 1 × 10-4 5 × 10-4 0.001 0.005 0.010 0.050 0.005 0.010 0.050 0.100 0.02 0.05 0.10 0.20 0.50 5 × 10-5 1 × 10-4 5 × 10-4 0.001 0.005 0.010 0.005 0.010 0.050 0.100 0.02 0.05 0.10 0.20 5 × 10-5 1 × 10-4 5 × 10-4 0.001 0.005 0.010 0.005 0.010 0.050 0.100 0.02 0.05 0.1...

    work page 1975

  20. [20]

    S. L. Detweiler, BLACK HOLES AND GRAVITA- TIONAL WAVES. III. THE RESONANT FREQUEN- CIES OF ROTATING HOLES, Astrophys. J.239, 292 (1980)

    work page 1980

  21. [21]

    Echeverria, Gravitational Wave Measurements of the Mass and Angular Momentum of a Black Hole, Phys

    F. Echeverria, Gravitational Wave Measurements of the Mass and Angular Momentum of a Black Hole, Phys. Rev. D40, 3194 (1989)

    work page 1989

  22. [22]

    L. S. Finn, Detection, measurement and gravitational radiation, Phys. Rev. D46, 5236 (1992), arXiv:gr- qc/9209010

    work page arXiv 1992

  23. [23]

    Dreyer, B

    O. Dreyer, B. J. Kelly, B. Krishnan, L. S. Finn, D. Gar- rison, and R. Lopez-Aleman, Black hole spectroscopy: Testing general relativity through gravitational wave ob- servations, Class. Quant. Grav.21, 787 (2004), arXiv:gr- qc/0309007

    work page arXiv 2004

  24. [24]

    On gravitational-wave spectroscopy of massive black holes with the space interferometer LISA

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and C. M. Will, On gravitational- wave spectroscopy of massive black holes with the space interferometer LISA, Phys. Rev. D73, 064030 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0512160

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  25. [25]

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt, Quasinormal modes of stars and black holes, Living Rev. Rel.2, 2 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9909058

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  26. [26]

    Nollert, TOPICAL REVIEW: Quasinormal modes: the characteristic ‘sound’ of black holes and neutron stars, Class

    H.-P. Nollert, TOPICAL REVIEW: Quasinormal modes: the characteristic ‘sound’ of black holes and neutron stars, Class. Quant. Grav.16, R159 (1999)

    work page 1999

  27. [27]

    Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. O. Starinets, Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes, Class. Quant. Grav.26, 163001 (2009), arXiv:0905.2975 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  28. [28]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Quasinormal modes of black holes: From astrophysics to string theory, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 793 (2011), arXiv:1102.4014 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  29. [29]

    Extreme Gravity Tests with Gravitational Waves from Compact Binary Coalescences: (II) Ringdown

    E. Berti, K. Yagi, H. Yang, and N. Yunes, Extreme Grav- ity Tests with Gravitational Waves from Compact Bi- nary Coalescences: (II) Ringdown, Gen. Rel. Grav.50, 49 (2018), arXiv:1801.03587 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  30. [30]

    Franchini and S

    N. Franchini and S. H. Völkel, Testing General Relativ- ity with Black Hole Quasi-normal Modes (Springer Sin- gapore, 2024) arXiv:2305.01696 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    Carullo, Black hole spectroscopy: status report, Gen

    G. Carullo, Black hole spectroscopy: status report, Gen. Rel. Grav.57, 76 (2025)

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment

    E. Bertiet al., Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment, (2025), arXiv:2505.23895 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    E. W. Leaver, An Analytic representation for the quasi normal modes of Kerr black holes, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A402, 285 (1985)

    work page 1985

  34. [34]

    A. K.-W. Chung, P. Wagle, and N. Yunes, Spectral method for metric perturbations of black holes: Kerr background case in general relativity, Phys. Rev. D109, 044072 (2024), arXiv:2312.08435 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    A. K.-W. Chung and N. Yunes, Quasinormal mode fre- quencies and gravitational perturbations of black holes with any subextremal spin in modified gravity through METRICS: The scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity case, Phys. Rev. D110, 064019 (2024), arXiv:2406.11986 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    J. L. Blázquez-Salcedo, F. S. Khoo, J. Kunz, and L. M. González-Romero, Quasinormal modes of Kerr black holes using a spectral decomposition of the met- ric perturbations, Phys. Rev. D109, 064028 (2024), arXiv:2312.10754 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    J. L. Blázquez-Salcedo, F. S. Khoo, B. Kleihaus, and J.Kunz,QuasinormalmodesofrapidlyrotatingEinstein- Gauss-Bonnet-dilaton black holes, Phys. Rev. D111, L021505 (2025), arXiv:2407.20760 [gr-qc]. 13

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    F. S. Khoo, J. L. Blázquez-Salcedo, B. Kleihaus, and J. Kunz, Quasinormal modes of rotating black holes in shift-symmetric Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet theory, (2024), arXiv:2412.09377 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    J. L. Blazquez-Salcedo, F. S. Khoo, B. Kleihaus, and J. Kunz, Quasinormal mode spectrum of rotating black holes in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet-dilaton theory, Phys. Rev. D111, 064015 (2025), arXiv:2412.17073 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    C. M. Bender and S. A. Orszag,Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers I(Springer, 1999)

    work page 1999

  41. [41]

    B. F. Schutz and C. M. Will, Black Hole Normal Modes: A Seminanalytic Approach, Astrophys. J. Lett.291, L33 (1985)

    work page 1985

  42. [42]

    Iyer and C

    S. Iyer and C. M. Will, Black Hole Normal Modes: A WKB Approach. 1. Foundations and Application of a Higher Order WKB Analysis of Potential Barrier Scat- tering, Phys. Rev. D35, 3621 (1987)

    work page 1987

  43. [43]

    Iyer, Black Hole Normal Modes: A WKB Approach

    S. Iyer, Black Hole Normal Modes: A WKB Approach. 2. SchwarzschildBlackHoles,Phys.Rev.D35,3632(1987)

    work page 1987

  44. [44]

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. F. Schutz, Black Hole Normal Modes: A WKB Approach. 3. The Reissner-Nordstrom Black Hole, Phys. Rev. D37, 3378 (1988)

    work page 1988

  45. [45]

    R. A. Konoplya, Quasinormal behavior of the d- dimensional Schwarzschild black hole and higher or- der WKB approach, Phys. Rev. D68, 024018 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0303052

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  46. [46]

    Quasinormal modes of black holes. The improved semianalytic approach

    J. Matyjasek and M. Opala, Quasinormal modes of black holes. The improved semianalytic approach, Phys. Rev. D96, 024011 (2017), arXiv:1704.00361 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  47. [47]

    A. G. Suvorov and S. H. Völkel, Exact theory for the Rezzolla-Zhidenko metric and self-consistent calculation of quasinormal modes, Phys. Rev. D103, 044027 (2021), arXiv:2101.09697 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  48. [48]

    Seidel and S

    E. Seidel and S. Iyer, Black Hole Normal Modes: A WKB Approach. 4. Kerr Black Holes, Phys. Rev. D41, 374 (1990)

    work page 1990

  49. [49]

    K. D. Kokkotas, Normal modes of the Kerr black hole, Class. Quant. Grav.8, 2217 (1991)

    work page 1991

  50. [50]

    Franzin, S

    E. Franzin, S. Liberati, J. Mazza, R. Dey, and S. Chakraborty, Scalar perturbations around rotating regular black holes and wormholes: Quasinormal modes, ergoregion instability, and superradiance, Phys. Rev. D 105, 124051 (2022), arXiv:2201.01650 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  51. [51]

    H. Yang, D. A. Nichols, F. Zhang, A. Zimmerman, Z. Zhang, and Y. Chen, Quasinormal-mode spectrum of Kerr black holes and its geometric interpretation, Phys. Rev. D86, 104006 (2012), arXiv:1207.4253 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  52. [52]

    Post-Kerr black hole spectroscopy

    K. Glampedakis, G. Pappas, H. O. Silva, and E. Berti, Post-Kerr black hole spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. D96, 064054 (2017), arXiv:1706.07658 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  53. [53]

    Glampedakis and H

    K. Glampedakis and H. O. Silva, Eikonal quasinormal modes of black holes beyond General Relativity, Phys. Rev. D100, 044040 (2019), arXiv:1906.05455 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  54. [54]

    H. O. Silva and K. Glampedakis, Eikonal quasinormal modes of black holes beyond general relativity. II. Gen- eralized scalar-tensor perturbations, Phys. Rev. D101, 044051 (2020), arXiv:1912.09286 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  55. [55]

    Bryant, H

    A. Bryant, H. O. Silva, K. Yagi, and K. Glampedakis, Eikonal quasinormal modes of black holes beyond general relativity. III. Scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D 104, 044051 (2021), arXiv:2106.09657 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  56. [56]

    R. A. Konoplya and Z. Stuchlík, Are eikonal quasinor- mal modes linked to the unstable circular null geodesics?, Phys. Lett. B771, 597 (2017), arXiv:1705.05928 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  57. [57]

    Miyachi, R

    T. Miyachi, R. Namba, H. Omiya, and N. Oshita, Path to an exact WKB analysis of black hole quasinormal modes, (2025), arXiv:2503.17245 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    P. A. Cano, L. Capuano, N. Franchini, S. Maenaut, and S. H. Völkel, Parametrized quasinormal mode framework for modified Teukolsky equations, Phys. Rev. D110, 104007 (2024), arXiv:2407.15947 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  59. [59]

    Cardoso, M

    V. Cardoso, M. Kimura, A. Maselli, E. Berti, C. F. B. Macedo, and R. McManus, Parametrized black hole quasinormal ringdown: Decoupled equations for non- rotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D99, 104077 (2019), arXiv:1901.01265 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  60. [60]

    McManus, E

    R. McManus, E. Berti, C. F. B. Macedo, M. Kimura, A. Maselli, and V. Cardoso, Parametrized black hole quasinormal ringdown. II. Coupled equations and quadratic corrections for nonrotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D100, 044061 (2019), arXiv:1906.05155 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  61. [61]

    S. H. Völkel, N. Franchini, and E. Barausse, Theory- agnostic reconstruction of potential and couplings from quasinormal modes, Phys. Rev. D105, 084046 (2022), arXiv:2202.08655 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  62. [62]

    S. H. Völkel, N. Franchini, E. Barausse, and E. Berti, Constraining modifications of black hole perturbation potentials near the light ring with quasinormal modes, Phys. Rev. D106, 124036 (2022), arXiv:2209.10564 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  63. [63]

    Franchini and S

    N. Franchini and S. H. Völkel, Parametrized quasinormal mode framework for non-Schwarzschild metrics, Phys. Rev. D107, 124063 (2023), arXiv:2210.14020 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  64. [64]

    Kimura, Note on the parametrized black hole quasi- normal ringdown formalism, Phys

    M. Kimura, Note on the parametrized black hole quasi- normal ringdown formalism, Phys. Rev. D101, 064031 (2020), arXiv:2001.09613 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  65. [65]

    Hirano, M

    S. Hirano, M. Kimura, M. Yamaguchi, and J. Zhang, Parametrized black hole quasinormal ringdown formal- ism for higher overtones, Phys. Rev. D110, 024015 (2024), arXiv:2404.09672 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  66. [66]

    R. A. Konoplya, A. Zhidenko, and A. F. Zinhailo, Higher order WKB formula for quasinormal modes and grey- body factors: recipes for quick and accurate calculations, Class. Quant. Grav.36, 155002 (2019), arXiv:1904.10333 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  67. [67]

    Chandrasekhar and S

    S. Chandrasekhar and S. L. Detweiler, Equations gov- erning gravitational perturbations of the Kerr black-hol e, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A350, 165 (1976)

    work page 1976

  68. [68]

    Black Hole Perturbation Toolkit, (bhptoolkit.org)

    work page

  69. [69]

    An effective formalism for testing extensions to General Relativity with gravitational waves

    S. Endlich, V. Gorbenko, J. Huang, and L. Senatore, An effective formalism for testing extensions to Gen- eral Relativity with gravitational waves, JHEP09, 122, arXiv:1704.01590 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  70. [70]

    P. A. Cano and A. Ruipérez, Leading higher-derivative corrections to Kerr geometry, JHEP05, 189, [Erratum: JHEP 03, 187 (2020)], arXiv:1901.01315 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  71. [71]

    Ruhdorfer, J

    M. Ruhdorfer, J. Serra, and A. Weiler, Effective Field Theory of Gravity to All Orders, JHEP05, 083, arXiv:1908.08050 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 1908

  72. [72]

    P. A. Cano, L. Capuano, N. Franchini, S. Maenaut, and S. H. Völkel, Higher-derivative corrections to the Kerr quasinormal mode spectrum, Phys. Rev. D110, 124057 (2024), arXiv:2409.04517 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  73. [73]

    P. A. Cano, K. Fransen, T. Hertog, and S. Maenaut, Uni- versal Teukolsky equations and black hole perturbations in higher-derivative gravity, Phys. Rev. D108, 024040 (2023), arXiv:2304.02663 [gr-qc]. 14

    work page arXiv 2023

  74. [74]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA), GW250114: Testing Hawking’s Area Law and the Kerr Nature of Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 111403 (2025), arXiv:2509.08054 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), Black Hole Spectroscopy and Tests of General Relativity with GW250114, (2025), arXiv:2509.08099 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  76. [76]

    Thomopoulos, S

    S. Thomopoulos, S. H. Völkel, and H. P. Pfeiffer, Ringdown spectroscopy of phenomenologically modi- fied black holes, Phys. Rev. D112, 064054 (2025), arXiv:2504.17848 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  77. [77]

    Albuquerque, S

    S. Albuquerque, S. H. Völkel, and K. D. Kokkotas, In- verse problem in energy-dependent potentials using semi- classical methods, Phys. Rev. D109, 096014 (2024), arXiv:2404.11478 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  78. [78]

    Albuquerque, S

    S. Albuquerque, S. H. Völkel, K. D. Kokkotas, and V. B. Bezerra, Inverse problem of analog gravity systems. II. Rotation and energy-dependent boundary conditions, Phys. Rev. D110, 064084 (2024), arXiv:2406.16670 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  79. [79]

    Capuano, M

    L. Capuano, M. Vaglio, R. S. Chandramouli, C. L. Pitte, A. Kuntz, and E. Barausse, Systematic bias in LISA ring- down analysis due to waveform inaccuracy, Phys. Rev. D 112, 104031 (2025), arXiv:2506.21181 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  80. [80]

    S. H. Völkel and A. Dhani, Quantifying systematic biases in black hole spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. D112, 084076 (2025), arXiv:2507.22122 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025