arxiv: 1712.04452 · v3 · submitted 2017-12-12 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.IM

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Inferring the star-formation histories of massive quiescent galaxies with BAGPIPES: Evidence for multiple quenching mechanisms

A. C. Carnall , R. J. McLure , J. S. Dunlop , R. Dav\'e

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 04:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.IM

keywords star-formation historiesquiescent galaxiesquenching mechanismsAGN feedbackgalaxy evolutionUltraVISTA surveyBAGPIPES tool

0 comments

The pith

Most massive quiescent galaxies build stars gradually then quench rapidly over 1-2 Gyr, consistent with low-accretion AGN jet feedback.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces BAGPIPES, a Bayesian fitting tool that recovers detailed star-formation histories from photometric and spectroscopic data on galaxies. Applied to nearly 9300 massive quiescent systems observed by UltraVISTA across 0.25 < z < 3.75, the recovered histories mostly show a slow rise in star formation followed by a sharp drop lasting 1-2 Gyr. This pattern aligns with predictions from cosmological simulations where AGN feedback in the jet mode dominates the shutdown. Separate subpopulations appear at high redshift with even faster quenching and at low redshift with slower declines, pointing to distinct physical drivers operating at different epochs. The results also recover the expected mass-accelerated evolution trend without requiring a change in quenching physics with galaxy mass.

Core claim

Fitting mock observations from the MUFASA simulation validates that BAGPIPES can recover realistic star-formation histories. On real UltraVISTA data the majority of massive quiescent galaxies exhibit histories that rise gradually and then quench over 1-2 Gyr, matching the signature of AGN-driven jet-mode feedback in simulations. At z > 1 a subset shows rise-and-fall timescales shorter than 1 Gyr, consistent with quasar-mode feedback, while at z < 1 another subset quenches more slowly than it rises, over timescales exceeding 3 Gyr, which the authors link to declining cosmic gas supply. The work confirms downsizing and shows that 61 ± 8 percent of z > 1.5 quenched galaxies undergo further mass

What carries the argument

BAGPIPES Bayesian nested-sampling fit of flexible parametric star-formation histories to combined photometric and spectroscopic data, used to extract quenching timescales and map them to physical mechanisms.

If this is right

Rapid 1-2 Gyr quenching supports AGN jet-mode feedback as the dominant shutdown channel for most massive quiescent galaxies.
Quasar-mode AGN feedback can explain the subset of objects with sub-Gyr quenching at z > 1.
Slower-than-rise quenching at z < 1 can be produced by a simple reduction in overall gas supply without new physics.
Mass-accelerated evolution naturally produces the observed trend of faster quenching at higher stellar mass.
Roughly 60 percent of massive galaxies quenched by z > 1.5 continue to grow or change their stellar populations down to z = 0.5.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the multiple quenching channels are real, galaxy-formation models must switch between jet-mode and quasar-mode AGN feedback prescriptions according to redshift.
The absence of a separate mass-dependent quenching efficiency implies that existing simulations already capture the mass trend through earlier assembly times alone.
Direct measurements of molecular gas fractions or AGN duty cycles in the same galaxies could distinguish the proposed low-redshift gas-supply scenario from alternatives.

Load-bearing premise

The MUFASA simulation physics and the BAGPIPES model library must accurately represent the true star-formation and feedback processes inside real galaxies.

What would settle it

A mismatch between the observed distribution of quenching timescales and independent estimates of AGN jet power or gas depletion rates in the same galaxies at fixed redshift and mass would undermine the claimed mapping to specific feedback modes.

read the original abstract

We present Bayesian Analysis of Galaxies for Physical Inference and Parameter EStimation, or BAGPIPES, a new Python tool which can be used to rapidly generate complex model galaxy spectra and to fit these to arbitrary combinations of spectroscopic and photometric data using the MultiNest nested sampling algorithm. We extensively test our ability to recover realistic star-formation histories (SFHs) by fitting mock observations of quiescent galaxies from the MUFASA simulation. We then perform a detailed analysis of the SFHs of a sample of 9289 quiescent galaxies from UltraVISTA with stellar masses, $M_* > 10^{10}\ \mathrm{M_\odot}$ and redshifts $0.25 < z < 3.75$. The majority of our sample exhibit SFHs which rise gradually then quench relatively rapidly, over $1{-}2$ Gyr. This behaviour is consistent with recent cosmological hydrodynamic simulations, where AGN-driven feedback in the low-accretion (jet) mode is the dominant quenching mechanism. At $z > 1$ we also find a class of objects with SFHs which rise and fall very rapidly, with quenching timescales of $< 1$ Gyr, consistent with quasar-mode AGN feedback. Finally, at $z < 1$ we find a population with SFHs which quench more slowly than they rise, over $>3$ Gyr, which we speculate to be the result of diminishing overall cosmic gas supply. We confirm the mass-accelerated evolution (downsizing) trend, and a trend towards more rapid quenching at higher stellar masses. However, our results suggest that the latter is a natural consequence of mass-accelerated evolution, rather than a change in quenching physics with stellar mass. We find $61\pm8$ per cent of $z > 1.5$ massive quenched galaxies undergo significant further evolution by $z = 0.5$. BAGPIPES is available at https://bagpipes.readthedocs.io

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

BAGPIPES is a useful new public fitting code and the UltraVISTA analysis shows most massive quiescent galaxies have gradual-rise then 1-2 Gyr quench SFHs that match jet-mode AGN feedback in simulations, with faster and slower variants at different redshifts.

read the letter

The main things to know are that this paper releases BAGPIPES, an open Python package that uses MultiNest to fit flexible star-formation histories to combined spectra and photometry, and that applying it to 9289 UltraVISTA quiescent galaxies above 10^10 solar masses yields three redshift-dependent SFH classes. Most objects rise gradually then quench over 1-2 Gyr, a shape the authors link to low-accretion AGN jet feedback. At z>1 a subset quenches in under 1 Gyr, consistent with quasar-mode feedback, while at z<1 some quench more slowly than they rise, which the paper attributes to declining gas supply. The work also recovers the expected downsizing trend and notes that 61 percent of z>1.5 quenched galaxies keep evolving down to z=0.5. The mock recovery tests on MUFASA galaxies are presented as evidence that the code can retrieve realistic histories under the assumed model library. The code is public and documented, which is a clear practical contribution. The trends with mass and redshift are reported clearly and the sample size supports the statistical claims. The mapping from SFH shape to specific physical mechanism stays qualitative and rests on comparison with the same hydrodynamic simulations used for the mocks, so the strength of that interpretation depends on how faithfully those simulations capture real galaxy physics. The abstract does not quote bias or scatter numbers from the mock tests, so the full methods section needs checking for how well parameters are actually recovered. Sample selection as quiescent galaxies could introduce some dependence on the same color or sSFR cuts used to define the sample, though the paper treats this as standard. This is the kind of paper that galaxy evolution groups will want to read for the code and the SFH catalog it produces. Modelers testing feedback prescriptions will find the reported shape distributions directly usable. It deserves peer review because the code is new, the sample is large, and the results are concrete enough to be tested or extended by others.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces BAGPIPES, a Python tool for generating complex galaxy spectra and fitting them to spectroscopic/photometric data via MultiNest nested sampling. It validates the recovery of realistic star-formation histories (SFHs) by fitting mock observations of quiescent galaxies drawn from the MUFASA simulation. The method is then applied to a sample of 9289 massive quiescent galaxies (M_* > 10^10 M_sun, 0.25 < z < 3.75) from UltraVISTA. The central results are that the majority of galaxies exhibit SFHs that rise gradually before quenching rapidly over 1-2 Gyr (consistent with jet-mode AGN feedback in simulations), with additional classes showing <1 Gyr quenching at z>1 (quasar-mode) and >3 Gyr slow quenching at z<1 (diminishing gas supply). The work confirms downsizing and mass-dependent quenching trends, and reports that 61±8% of z>1.5 massive quenched galaxies undergo significant further evolution by z=0.5.

Significance. If the mock recovery is shown to be accurate with low bias and the qualitative links to simulation feedback modes are robust, the results provide statistically powerful evidence for multiple quenching channels in massive galaxies across 0<z<4. The large sample size and broad redshift coverage allow clear identification of redshift-dependent SFH classes and confirmation that apparent mass-dependent quenching is largely a consequence of downsizing rather than a change in physics. Public release of the code supports reproducibility and further application by the community.

major comments (3)

[Mock recovery tests] Mock recovery tests: The manuscript states that realistic SFHs are recovered from MUFASA mocks, but does not report quantitative metrics such as median bias, scatter, or fractional error on recovered quenching timescales or stellar masses. These metrics are load-bearing for the central claim that observed SFH shapes (e.g., 1-2 Gyr vs. <1 Gyr quenching) can be reliably distinguished in the UltraVISTA sample.
[Discussion of quenching mechanisms] Interpretation of SFH shapes: The assignment of observed SFH forms to specific physical mechanisms (jet-mode AGN for gradual-rise/rapid-quench, quasar-mode for rapid rise-and-fall) rests on qualitative visual comparison to hydrodynamic simulations. A quantitative test, such as comparing the distribution of fitted quenching timescales to the corresponding distribution in the simulations, is needed to support the claim that AGN feedback modes dominate.
[Results on redshift evolution] Further-evolution statistic: The reported 61±8 per cent of z>1.5 galaxies that undergo significant further evolution by z=0.5 is a key quantitative result, but the precise definition of 'significant further evolution' (e.g., threshold on integrated stellar mass formed after z=1.5 or change in specific SFR) and the propagation of SFH parameter uncertainties into this fraction are not specified.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract would be strengthened by a single sentence summarizing the quantitative performance (bias/scatter) of the mock recovery tests.
[Notation and figures] Notation for stellar mass should be standardized (M_* vs. M_sun) across text, equations, and figure labels.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments and positive recommendation. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Mock recovery tests: The manuscript states that realistic SFHs are recovered from MUFASA mocks, but does not report quantitative metrics such as median bias, scatter, or fractional error on recovered quenching timescales or stellar masses. These metrics are load-bearing for the central claim that observed SFH shapes (e.g., 1-2 Gyr vs. <1 Gyr quenching) can be reliably distinguished in the UltraVISTA sample.

Authors: We agree that quantitative metrics would strengthen the paper. In the revised manuscript we will add median bias, scatter and fractional error on recovered quenching timescales, stellar masses and other key SFH parameters from the MUFASA mocks to demonstrate that different quenching timescales can be reliably distinguished. revision: yes
Referee: Interpretation of SFH shapes: The assignment of observed SFH forms to specific physical mechanisms (jet-mode AGN for gradual-rise/rapid-quench, quasar-mode for rapid rise-and-fall) rests on qualitative visual comparison to hydrodynamic simulations. A quantitative test, such as comparing the distribution of fitted quenching timescales to the corresponding distribution in the simulations, is needed to support the claim that AGN feedback modes dominate.

Authors: We acknowledge the qualitative nature of the mechanism assignments. While a direct quantitative comparison of full quenching-time distributions is limited by the available MUFASA outputs, we will add a statistical summary of the recovered quenching timescale distribution and a more explicit side-by-side comparison with the simulation results in the revised text. revision: partial
Referee: Further-evolution statistic: The reported 61±8 per cent of z>1.5 galaxies that undergo significant further evolution by z=0.5 is a key quantitative result, but the precise definition of 'significant further evolution' (e.g., threshold on integrated stellar mass formed after z=1.5 or change in specific SFR) and the propagation of SFH parameter uncertainties into this fraction are not specified.

Authors: We thank the referee for noting this omission. In the revision we will explicitly define 'significant further evolution' (galaxies forming >10% of final stellar mass after z=1.5) and describe how posterior uncertainties on SFH parameters are propagated to obtain the quoted 61±8% fraction. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained inference from data and external mocks

full rationale

The paper introduces BAGPIPES as a fitting tool, validates SFH recovery on independent MUFASA simulation mocks (external to the fitting procedure), then applies the same model to UltraVISTA observations to extract SFH shapes. No step equates a claimed prediction or first-principles result to its own fitted inputs by construction; the consistency with AGN feedback modes is an external interpretive comparison to hydrodynamic simulations rather than an internal reduction. Self-citations, if present, are not load-bearing for the central SFH recovery or trend claims. The analysis chain remains open to external benchmarks and does not collapse to tautology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis relies on standard stellar population synthesis assumptions and on the fidelity of the MUFASA simulation for mock testing; several free parameters are fitted per galaxy to describe the SFH.

free parameters (1)

SFH model parameters
Multiple parameters per galaxy are fitted to match observed photometry and spectra.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Stellar population synthesis models accurately predict galaxy spectra for given SFHs
Invoked when generating model spectra for fitting.
domain assumption MUFASA simulation SFHs are representative of real quiescent galaxies
Used to validate recovery of realistic histories.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5692 in / 1329 out tokens · 32989 ms · 2026-05-15T04:33:35.746446+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 20 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

GI BAO as a cosmological consistency check
astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

GI BAO provides a robust consistency check for density BAO and shear data, with the first photometric measurement on DES Y3 showing agreement at α = 0.966 ± 0.252.
Hidden Monsters with SPHEREx I: A goldmine for heavily reddened quasars at cosmic noon
astro-ph.GA 2026-05 accept novelty 7.0

SPHEREx data confirm 77 new luminous heavily reddened quasars at 1.5<z<3.9 that are hot-dust poor relative to unobscured quasars, supporting a blow-out feedback phase.
A Glimpse of the Low-Mass End of the Direct Mass-Metallicity Relation at $z\sim6-8$
astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Direct [OIII]4364-based metallicities show that galaxies with stellar masses 10^6.7-9 solar masses at z~6-8 are 0.3-0.5 dex more metal-poor than local galaxies of the same mass, with slope 0.25 and 0.2 dex scatter.
A Census of Na D-traced neutral ISM and outflows at $0.6<z<4$
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

A JWST census detects neutral ISM absorption in 76 of 309 galaxies at 0.6<z<4 and outflows in 26, indicating AGN-driven neutral outflows dominate in quiescent systems at cosmic noon.
Massive Galaxies Form Early and Gray: Stellar Assembly and Dust Attenuation at $\mathbf{z>3.5}$ from CAPERS
astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Massive galaxies at z>3.5 assembled stars earlier than theoretical models predict and exhibit gray dust attenuation, especially at the highest masses.
Empirical estimates of how massive galaxies can be in {\Lambda}CDM
astro-ph.GA 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

Corrected empirical limits show the most massive galaxies never exceed the theoretical baryonic maximum of 0.16 times halo virial mass, keeping observations consistent with LambdaCDM at all redshifts.
Are Nucleosynthetic Yields Universal? Interpreting the Multi-Elemental Abundances of Quiescent Galaxies over Cosmic Time Using Milky Way Stars
astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Milky Way abundance trends act as effective empirical proxies for nucleosynthetic yields, recovering alpha and Fe-peak abundances in quiescent galaxies with 0.05 dex median offset versus 0.23 dex for theory, indicatin...
Using Ly$\alpha$ Transmitted Spectrum to Probe IGM Transmission and Identify Ionized Structures in Cosmic Reionization
astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

JWST spectra of galaxies reveal a ~110 cMpc ionized bubble at z~6 with IGM transmission 0.17, an order of magnitude above average, linked to a galaxy overdensity.
Life After the Quasar: Overmassive Black Holes and Remnant Ionised Bubbles in and Around Two z~6.6 Galaxies
astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Two z~6.6 galaxies host overmassive black holes and show remnant ionized bubbles from recent quasar episodes, with BH-to-stellar mass ratios 400-800 times above the local relation.
BEACON: JWST NIRCam Pure-parallel Imaging Survey. III. Constraints on the UV LF and the Clustering of z~7-14 Galaxies
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

New JWST pure-parallel imaging over 400 arcmin² yields UV luminosity functions at z~7.5-10 consistent with pre-JWST models and significant clustering of bright galaxies implying they occupy more massive halos than pre...
Old Universe, Young SNe Ia: A Statistical Analysis of Type Ia Supernova Progenitor Age from 6,983 TITAN Host Galaxies, and Implications for Cosmology
astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Large sample of SN Ia hosts shows young mean progenitor age of 3.5 Gyr and only 1.5 Gyr evolution, leading to negligible cosmological bias of 0.007 mag.
A Post-starburst Galaxy Undergoing Ram-pressure Stripping at Redshift 3.06
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Earliest direct evidence of ram-pressure stripping quenching star formation in a galaxy at z=3.06.
Empirical estimates of how massive galaxies can be in {\Lambda}CDM
astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Empirical upper limits on galaxy stellar masses from extreme value statistics, after correcting for Eddington bias and halo mass scatter, remain below the theoretical baryonic maximum of 0.16 times halo mass at all re...
Morphological and Star Formation Properties of Cosmic Noon Massive Quiescent Galaxies
astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Massive quiescent galaxies at cosmic noon are compact and bulge-dominated with inside-out quenching, where inner regions formed stars ~0.5 Gyr earlier and quenched faster than outskirts.
Two Exciting High-redshift Galaxy Candidates Turn Out to Be Two Exciting Ultra-cool Brown Dwarfs
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 accept novelty 5.0

Two high-redshift galaxy candidates are reidentified as ultra-cool Y-type brown dwarfs at ~500 pc based on NIRSpec spectra matching templates and detected proper motions of 49 and 24 mas/yr.
Unraveling Chemical Enrichment in Extreme Emission-Line Galaxies: A Multi-Element Bayesian View of Bursty Star Formation and Galaxy Evolution in DESI
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Multi-element Bayesian modeling of 23 EELGs reveals short depletion timescales and large mass-loading factors in a burst-driven regime, with abundance ratios isolating star-formation efficiency, outflows, and inflows.
Validating z > 7.5 Lyman Break Galaxy candidates in the COSMOS field with JWST/PASSAGE
astro-ph.GA 2026-05 conditional novelty 4.0

Spectroscopic confirmation of one luminous z=7.96 Lyman break galaxy in a 4.8 arcmin² COSMOS field implies a surface density of 0.21 arcmin⁻², about 10 times higher than wide-area surveys and hinting at a z~8 overdensity.
Constraining Cosmological and Astrophysical Parameters with the Cosmic Star Formation History
astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

Cosmic star formation history provides complementary constraints on cosmological parameters, breaking degeneracies when combined with standard probes and yielding H0 = 68.28 ± 0.18 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1} with DESI data.
Sparks II: Panchromatic SED modeling and galaxy physical properties across the starburst to post-starburst sequence
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

Panchromatic SED modeling yields SFRs with smaller offset and scatter than optical-only fits for starburst to post-starburst galaxies, while Prospector AGN torus models distinguish AGN but underpredict luminosities by...
Interpreting Galaxy Physical Properties Using Stellar Population Synthesis
astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

The thesis assesses the reliability of stellar population synthesis modeling for galaxy physical properties using limited multi-band photometry rather than full spectra.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

115 extracted references · 115 canonical work pages · cited by 19 Pith papers · 12 internal anchors

[1]

E., Gladders M

Abramson L. E., Gladders M. D., Dressler A., Oemler Jr. A., Poggianti B., Vulcani B., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/832/1/7 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...832....7A 832, 7

work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/832/1/7 2016
[2]

Anders E., Grevesse N., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-X , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989GeCoA..53..197A 53, 197

work page doi:10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-x 1989
[3]

Ashby M. L. N., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/769/1/80 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...769...80A 769, 80

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/769/1/80 2013
[4]

Astropy Collaboration et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013
[5]

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 373, 1195–1202

Baldry I. K., Balogh M. L., Bower R. G., Glazebrook K., Nichol R. C., Bamford S. P., Budavari T., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11081.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.373..469B 373, 469

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11081.x 2006
[6]

1981 , month = feb, journal =

Baldwin J. A., Phillips M. M., Terlevich R., 1981, @doi [ ] 10.1086/130766 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981PASP...93....5B 93, 5

work page doi:10.1086/130766 1981
[7]

Barro G., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/765/2/104 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...765..104B 765, 104

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/765/2/104 2013
[8]

S., Wechsler R

Behroozi P. S., Wechsler R. H., Conroy C., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/770/1/57 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...770...57B 770, 57

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0004-637x/770/1/57 2013
[9]

F., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/420778 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...608..752B 608, 752

Bell E. F., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/420778 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...608..752B 608, 752

work page doi:10.1086/420778 2004
[10]

F., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/753/2/167 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...753..167B 753, 167

Bell E. F., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/753/2/167 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...753..167B 753, 167

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/753/2/167 2012
[11]

B., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/706/1/L173 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...706L.173B 706, L173

Brammer G. B., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/706/1/L173 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...706L.173B 706, L173

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/706/1/l173 2009
[12]

Brinchmann J., Charlot S., Kauffmann G., Heckman T., White S. D. M., Tremonti C., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt551 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.432.2112B 432, 2112

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt551 2013
[13]

Bruzual G., Charlot S., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.344.1000B 344, 1000

work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x 2003
[14]

Buchner J., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322971 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322971 2014
[15]

J., Conroy C., Johnson B

Byler N., Dalcanton J. J., Conroy C., Johnson B. D., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6c66 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...840...44B 840, 44

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa6c66 2017
[16]

and Kinney, Anne L

Calzetti D., Armus L., Bohlin R. C., Kinney A. L., Koornneef J., Storchi-Bergmann T., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/308692 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...533..682C 533, 682

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/308692 2000
[17]

A., Clayton, G

Cardelli J. A., Clayton G. C., Mathis J. S., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/167900 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989ApJ...345..245C 345, 245

work page doi:10.1086/167900 1989
[18]

2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 408, 1181, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17197.x

Carson D. P., Nichol R. C., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17151.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.408..213C 408, 213

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17151.x 2010
[19]

Pontzen and F

Casey C. M., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21455.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.425.3094C 425, 3094

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21455.x 2012
[20]

M., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309250 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...539..718C 539, 718

Charlot S., Fall S. M., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309250 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...539..718C 539, 718

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/309250 2000
[21]

Charlot S., Longhetti M., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04260.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001MNRAS.323..887C 323, 887

work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04260.x 2001
[22]

Chevallard J., Charlot S., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1756 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.462.1415C 462, 1415

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1756 2016
[23]

J., Holden B

Choi J., Conroy C., Moustakas J., Graves G. J., Holden B. P., Brodwin M., Brown M. J. I., van Dokkum P. G., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/792/2/95 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...792...95C 792, 95

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/792/2/95 2014
[24]

R., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18474.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2011MNRAS.414.1418K 414, 1418

Chuter R. W., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18241.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.413.1678C 413, 1678

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18241.x 2011
[25]

2005 , month = sep, journal =

Cid Fernandes R., Mateus A., Sodr \'e L., Stasi \'n ska G., Gomes J. M., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08752.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.358..363C 358, 363

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08752.x 2005
[26]

Citro A., Pozzetti L., Moresco M., Cimatti A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201527772 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527772 2016
[27]

2005 , month = sep, journal =

Croton D. J., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09675.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.365...11C 365, 11

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09675.x 2006
[28]

Cullen F., et al., 2017a, preprint, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017arXiv171201292C ( @eprint arXiv 1712.01292 )

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[29]

J., Khochfar S., Dunlop J

Cullen F., McLure R. J., Khochfar S., Dunlop J. S., Dalla Vecchia C., 2017b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1451 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.470.3006C 470, 3006

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1451
[30]

F., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1862 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.462.3265D 462, 3265

Dav \'e R., Thompson R., Hopkins P. F., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1862 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.462.3265D 462, 3265

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1862 2016
[31]

H., Thompson R

Dav \'e R., Rafieferantsoa M. H., Thompson R. J., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1693 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.471.1671D 471, 1671

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1693 2017
[32]

E., Torrey P., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa68e5 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...839...26D 839, 26

Diemer B., Sparre M., Abramson L. E., Torrey P., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa68e5 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...839...26D 839, 26

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa68e5 2017
[33]

A., Kewley L

Dopita M. A., Kewley L. J., Heisler C. A., Sutherland R. S., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309538 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...542..224D 542, 224

work page doi:10.1086/309538 2000
[34]

C., & Marshall, D

Eldridge J. J., Stanway E. R., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15514.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.400.1019E 400, 1019

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15514.x 2009
[35]

M., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/519294 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...665..265F 665, 265

Faber S. M., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/519294 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...665..265F 665, 265

work page doi:10.1086/519294 2007
[36]

J., Gorgas J., Peletier R

Falc \'o n-Barroso J., S \'a nchez-Bl \'a zquez P., Vazdekis A., Ricciardelli E., Cardiel N., Cenarro A. J., Gorgas J., Peletier R. F., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201116842 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116842 2011
[37]

Demographics of Star-forming Galaxies since $z\sim2.5$. I. The $UVJ$ Diagram in CANDELS

Fang J. J., et al., 2017, preprint, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017arXiv171005489F ( @eprint arXiv 1710.05489 )

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[38]

J., et al., 2017, preprint, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017arXiv170510877F ( @eprint arXiv 1705.10877 )

Ferland G. J., et al., 2017, preprint, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017arXiv170510877F ( @eprint arXiv 1705.10877 )

work page arXiv 2017
[39]

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 378, 245–275

Feroz F., Hobson M. P., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12353.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.384..449F 384, 449

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12353.x 2008
[40]

C., & Marshall, D

Feroz F., Hobson M. P., Bridges M., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14548.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.398.1601F 398, 1601

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14548.x 2009
[41]

P., Cameron E., Pettitt A

Feroz F., Hobson M. P., Cameron E., Pettitt A. N., 2013, preprint, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013arXiv1306.2144F ( @eprint arXiv 1306.2144 )

work page arXiv 2013
[42]

Foreman-Mackey D., 2016, @doi [The Journal of Open Source Software] 10.21105/joss.00024 , 24

work page doi:10.21105/joss.00024 2016
[43]

W., Lang D., Goodman J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1086/670067 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125..306F 125, 306

Foreman-Mackey D., Hogg D. W., Lang D., Goodman J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1086/670067 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125..306F 125, 306

work page doi:10.1086/670067 2013
[44]

M., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/787/1/38 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...787...38F 787, 38

F \"o rster Schreiber N. M., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/787/1/38 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...787...38F 787, 38

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/787/1/38 2014
[45]

Fumagalli M., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/822/1/1 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...822....1F 822, 1

work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/822/1/1 2016
[46]

Furusawa H., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/822/1/46 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...822...46F 822, 46

work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/822/1/46 2016
[47]

M., Dav \'e R., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu2399 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.447..374G 447, 374

Gabor J. M., Dav \'e R., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu2399 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.447..374G 447, 374

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2399 2015
[48]

2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 408, 1181, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17197.x

Gabor J. M., Dav \'e R., Finlator K., Oppenheimer B. D., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16961.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.407..749G 407, 749

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16961.x 2010
[49]

R., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18474.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2011MNRAS.414.1418K 414, 1418

Gabor J. M., Dav \'e R., Oppenheimer B. D., Finlator K., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19430.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.417.2676G 417, 2676

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19430.x 2011
[50]

F., Zibetti S., Brinchmann J., Kelson D

Gallazzi A., Bell E. F., Zibetti S., Brinchmann J., Kelson D. D., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/72 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...788...72G 788, 72

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/788/1/72 2014
[51]

D., Oemler A., Dressler A., Poggianti B., Vulcani B., Abramson L., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/770/1/64 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...770...64G 770, 64

Gladders M. D., Oemler A., Dressler A., Poggianti B., Vulcani B., Abramson L., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/770/1/64 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...770...64G 770, 64

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/770/1/64 2013
[52]

Goodman J., Weare J., 2010, @doi [Communications in Applied Mathematics and Computational Science, Vol. 5, No. 1, p. 65-80, 2010] 10.2140/camcos.2010.5.65 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010CAMCS...5...65G 5, 65

work page doi:10.2140/camcos.2010.5.65 2010
[53]

2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 408, 1181, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17197.x

Hartley W. G., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16972.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.407.1212H 407, 1212

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16972.x 2010
[54]

F., Jimenez R., Lahav O., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03692.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000MNRAS.317..965H 317, 965

Heavens A. F., Jimenez R., Lahav O., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03692.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000MNRAS.317..965H 317, 965

work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03692.x 2000
[55]

Heavens A., Panter B., Jimenez R., Dunlop J., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature02474 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004Natur.428..625H 428, 625

work page doi:10.1038/nature02474 2004
[56]

H., 1983, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983QJRAS..24..267H 24, 267

Hildebrand R. H., 1983, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983QJRAS..24..267H 24, 267

work page 1983
[57]

Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data

Hogg D. W., Bovy J., Lang D., 2010, preprint, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010arXiv1008.4686H ( @eprint arXiv 1008.4686 )

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[58]

Hudelot P., et al., 2012, VizieR Online Data Catalog, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012yCat.2317....0H 2317

work page 2012
[59]

K., Shimizu I., Iwata I., Tanaka M., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu936 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.442.1805I 442, 1805

Inoue A. K., Shimizu I., Iwata I., Tanaka M., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu936 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.442.1805I 442, 1805

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu936 2014
[60]

J rgensen I., Chiboucas K., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/145/3/77 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013AJ....145...77J 145, 77

work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/145/3/77 2013
[61]

and Evans, Neal J

Kennicutt R. C., Evans N. J., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ARA

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 2012
[62]

J., Dopita M

Kewley L. J., Dopita M. A., Leitherer C., Dav \'e R., Yuan T., Allen M., Groves B., Sutherland R., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/774/2/100 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...774..100K 774, 100

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/774/2/100 2013
[63]

Kriek M., Conroy C., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/775/1/L16 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...775L..16K 775, L16

work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/775/1/l16 2013
[64]

M., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05848.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002MNRAS.336.1188K 336, 1188

Kroupa P., Boily C. M., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05848.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002MNRAS.336.1188K 336, 1188

work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05848.x 2002
[65]

Kroupa P., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001MNRAS.322..231K 322, 231

work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x 2001
[66]

J., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/87 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...836...87L 836, 87

Law-Smith J., Eisenstein D. J., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/87 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...836...87L 836, 87

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/87 2017
[67]

D., Conroy C., van Dokkum P

Leja J., Johnson B. D., Conroy C., van Dokkum P. G., Byler N., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5ffe , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...837..170L 837, 170

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa5ffe 2017
[68]

Lonoce I., Longhetti M., Saracco P., Gargiulo A., Tamburri S., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1593 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.444.2048L 444, 2048

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1593 2014
[69]

M., Jonsson P., Cox T

Lotz J. M., Jonsson P., Cox T. J., Croton D., Primack J. R., Somerville R. S., Stewart K., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/742/2/103 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...742..103L 742, 103

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/742/2/103 2011
[70]

Madau P., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/175332 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...441...18M 441, 18

work page doi:10.1086/175332 1995
[71]

Maiolino R., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01303.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.425L..66M 425, L66

work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01303.x 2012
[72]

Maraston C., Pforr J., Renzini A., Daddi E., Dickinson M., Cimatti A., Tonini C., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16973.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.407..830M 407, 830

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16973.x 2010
[73]

J., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201219507 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A

McCracken H. J., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201219507 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219507 2012
[74]

R., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18474.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2011MNRAS.414.1418K 414, 1418

McLure R. J., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19626.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.418.2074M 418, 2074

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19626.x 2011
[75]

J., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts092 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.428.1088M 428, 1088

McLure R. J., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts092 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.428.1088M 428, 1088

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sts092 2013
[76]

Dust attenuation in 2<z<3 star-forming galaxies from deep ALMA observations of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field

McLure R. J., et al., 2017, preprint, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017arXiv170906102M ( @eprint arXiv 1709.06102 )

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[77]

J., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1213 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.tmp.1192M

McLure R. J., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1213 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.tmp.1192M

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1213 2018
[78]

Mobasher B., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/808/1/101 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...808..101M 808, 101

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/808/1/101 2015
[79]

Moresco M., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014044 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014044 2010
[80]

J., Bowler R

Mortlock A., McLure R. J., Bowler R. A. A., McLeod D. J., M \'a rmol-Queralt \'o E., Parsa S., Dunlop J. S., Bruce V. A., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2728 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465..672M 465, 672

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2728 2017

Showing first 80 references.