Science with the Einstein Telescope: a comparison of different designs
Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 21:38 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
A single triangular Einstein Telescope with 10 km arms delivers science metrics comparable to a network of two L-shaped detectors in Europe.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The reference triangular design with 10 km arms and the alternative 2L configurations both support strong science cases, with quantitative differences in detection rates and science reach arising from arm length choices and the presence or absence of the low-frequency detector.
What carries the argument
The set of simple quantitative metrics that score science output for compact binary coalescences, multi-messenger events, and stochastic backgrounds across detector geometries and arm lengths.
If this is right
- Removing the low-frequency instrument reduces performance most sharply on multi-messenger and low-frequency stochastic-background science.
- Increasing arm length from 10 km improves reach for lower-frequency signals in both triangular and 2L layouts.
- Misaligned 2L networks recover much of the sky-localization advantage of the triangular geometry.
- Overall science output remains comparable across the examined geometries once arm length and low-frequency coverage are fixed.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The results could help prioritize arm length over geometry when budget constraints force a choice.
- Similar metric-based comparisons could be applied to site selection outside Europe or to Cosmic Explorer designs.
- Adding detailed waveform and population modeling would test whether the current ranking of configurations holds.
Load-bearing premise
That the chosen simple metrics for compact binary coalescences, multi-messenger astronomy and stochastic backgrounds accurately reflect the full scientific value of each detector configuration without needing more detailed population or waveform modeling.
What would settle it
A full population study of binary neutron star mergers that produces detection numbers or sky-localization accuracies differing by more than 20 percent between the triangular and best 2L configurations.
read the original abstract
The Einstein Telescope (ET), the European project for a third-generation gravitational-wave detector, has a reference configuration based on a triangular shape consisting of three nested detectors with 10 km arms, where in each arm there is a `xylophone' configuration made of an interferometer tuned toward high frequencies, and an interferometer tuned toward low frequencies and working at cryogenic temperature. Here, we examine the scientific perspectives under possible variations of this reference design. We perform a detailed evaluation of the science case for a single triangular geometry observatory, and we compare it with the results obtained for a network of two L-shaped detectors (either parallel or misaligned) located in Europe, considering different choices of arm-length for both the triangle and the 2L geometries. We also study how the science output changes in the absence of the low-frequency instrument, both for the triangle and the 2L configurations. We examine a broad class of simple `metrics' that quantify the science output, related to compact binary coalescences, multi-messenger astronomy and stochastic backgrounds, and we then examine the impact of different detector designs on a more specific set of scientific objectives.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper evaluates scientific output for the Einstein Telescope under variations of the reference triangular design (10 km arms with xylophone) versus European networks of two L-shaped detectors (parallel or misaligned), including cases with different arm lengths and without the low-frequency instrument. It quantifies performance via simple metrics for compact binary coalescences, multi-messenger astronomy, and stochastic backgrounds, then assesses effects on specific scientific objectives.
Significance. If the metrics prove faithful, the work supplies concrete design guidance for ET by ranking configurations across multiple science cases. The systematic inclusion of both triangular and 2L geometries with arm-length variations is a strength, as is the explicit comparison with and without the low-frequency xylophone. The analysis rests on external sensitivity curves and standard population models rather than internal derivations, which limits parameter freedom but also means results inherit any biases in those inputs.
major comments (2)
- [Metrics definition and results sections] The central ranking of triangular versus 2L configurations rests on the assumption that the chosen population-averaged metrics for CBC detection rates and multi-messenger events are faithful proxies. This is load-bearing for the design recommendations, yet the manuscript does not validate them against full Monte-Carlo population synthesis or realistic waveform injections that would capture selection effects and waveform-dependent SNR variations (see abstract and the metrics section). A systematic mismatch could invert the reported preferences.
- [Stochastic background metrics] § on stochastic backgrounds: the comparison of sensitivity to stochastic signals uses simplified integrated SNR metrics without addressing how non-stationary noise or overlapping signals in a network would alter the relative performance of triangular versus misaligned 2L geometries.
minor comments (2)
- [Detector configurations] Notation for arm-length variants and xylophone configurations is introduced without a consolidated table; a single summary table would improve readability.
- [Figures] Some figure captions lack explicit statement of the exact population model or SNR threshold used, making it harder to reproduce the plotted curves.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the thoughtful and constructive comments on our manuscript. We have addressed each major comment below, clarifying the scope and limitations of our metrics while making targeted revisions to strengthen the discussion of their assumptions and potential caveats.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Metrics definition and results sections] The central ranking of triangular versus 2L configurations rests on the assumption that the chosen population-averaged metrics for CBC detection rates and multi-messenger events are faithful proxies. This is load-bearing for the design recommendations, yet the manuscript does not validate them against full Monte-Carlo population synthesis or realistic waveform injections that would capture selection effects and waveform-dependent SNR variations (see abstract and the metrics section). A systematic mismatch could invert the reported preferences.
Authors: We acknowledge that the metrics employed are simplified, population-averaged proxies derived from standard sensitivity curves and population models in the literature, rather than full end-to-end Monte Carlo simulations with waveform injections. Such detailed validations are computationally demanding and lie beyond the scope of this comparative design study, which instead follows established practices for initial assessments of detector geometries (as seen in prior ET and third-generation detector papers). The relative rankings are intended to highlight geometric and arm-length effects at a first-order level. In the revised manuscript we have added an explicit discussion of these limitations in the metrics section, including a note that more detailed simulations could be pursued in follow-up work, while arguing that the reported preferences are unlikely to invert under reasonable variations in selection effects. revision: partial
-
Referee: [Stochastic background metrics] § on stochastic backgrounds: the comparison of sensitivity to stochastic signals uses simplified integrated SNR metrics without addressing how non-stationary noise or overlapping signals in a network would alter the relative performance of triangular versus misaligned 2L geometries.
Authors: The stochastic-background comparison relies on the standard integrated SNR metric, which is widely used for comparing network sensitivities to isotropic backgrounds. We recognize that non-stationary noise and overlapping signals could introduce additional differences, especially between the redundant triangular layout and misaligned 2L configurations. The manuscript focuses on the dominant geometric and sensitivity-curve distinctions; however, we have expanded the relevant section in the revision to discuss these secondary effects qualitatively and to note that they would likely reinforce rather than reverse the primary conclusions drawn from the simplified metric. revision: partial
Circularity Check
No circularity: comparisons use external sensitivity curves and standard models
full rationale
The paper performs quantitative comparisons of science output for triangular vs. 2L ET geometries across arm lengths and xylophone configurations. All metrics for CBCs, multi-messenger events, and stochastic backgrounds are computed from externally supplied sensitivity curves and standard astrophysical population models. No step defines a quantity in terms of itself, renames a fit as a prediction, or relies on a load-bearing self-citation whose result is unverified outside the paper. The derivation chain remains self-contained against independent benchmarks.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Standard models for compact binary coalescence rates and waveforms are sufficiently accurate for ranking detector designs.
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.DimensionForcingdimension_forced unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
We perform a detailed evaluation of the science case for a single triangular geometry observatory, and we compare it with the results obtained for a network of two L-shaped detectors (either parallel or misaligned) located in Europe, considering different choices of arm-length for both the triangle and the 2L geometries.
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Forward citations
Cited by 21 Pith papers
-
End-to-End Population Inference from Gravitational-Wave Strain using Transformers
Dingo-Pop uses a transformer to perform amortized, end-to-end population inference from GW strain data in seconds, bypassing per-event Monte Carlo sampling.
-
Tracing Primordial Gravitational Waves via non-Gaussian Signatures of Halo Bias
Tensor-induced non-Gaussianity from primordial gravitational waves generates a unique scale-dependent halo bias correction that can reach order-one amplitude for rare high-redshift halos at z=7.
-
How lonely are the Binary Compact Objects Detected by the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collaboration?
No three-body encounter signatures detected in GW170817, GW190814, and GW230627_015337, constraining intermediate-mass black holes above 100 solar masses within roughly 0.1 AU of these binaries.
-
Novel ringdown tests of general relativity with black hole greybody factors
GreyRing model based on greybody factors reproduces numerical relativity ringdown signals with mismatches of order 10^{-6} and enables a new post-merger consistency test of general relativity applied to GW250114.
-
Exact, non-singular black holes from a phantom DBI Field as primordial dark matter
Exact non-singular black holes from the phantom DBI field evaporate to gram-mass relics, opening a new mass window for primordial black holes as dark matter.
-
Primordial Black Hole from Tensor-induced Density Fluctuation: First-order Phase Transitions and Domain Walls
Tensor perturbations from first-order phase transitions and domain wall annihilation induce curvature fluctuations at second order that form primordial black holes, allowing asteroid-mass PBHs to comprise all dark mat...
-
Fast neural network surrogate for multimodal effective-one-body gravitational waveforms from generically precessing compact binaries
Neural network surrogate approximates precessing compact binary gravitational waveforms up to 1000x faster than the base EOB model with validated accuracy.
-
Post-Newtonian inspiral waveform model for eccentric precessing binaries with higher-order modes and matter effects
pyEFPEHM extends prior PN models to include higher-order quasi-circular phasing, generalized precession solutions, and eccentric corrections up to 1PN in selected multipoles for eccentric precessing binaries with matt...
-
A unified harmonic framework for dark siren cosmology
The GW-galaxy cross-correlation method, unified with spectral sirens in a harmonic framework, can measure H0 to 1% and Omega_m to 5% precision with 2 years of data from next-generation detectors like Einstein Telescop...
-
The relativistic restricted three-body problem: geometry and motion around tidally perturbed black holes
Increasing tidal deformation around a black hole drives bound geodesics through weak chaos, plunging, unbinding, and eventual depletion of all bound motion, with semi-analytic critical amplitudes for each transition.
-
Photon counting readout for detection and inference of gravitational waves from neutron star merger remnants
Photon counting readout detects weak postmerger gravitational wave signals at a rate of about 1 in 100 for SNR 0.2 and yields a twofold improvement in neutron star radius measurement after 20,000 events.
-
Excitation factors for horizonless compact objects: long-lived modes, echoes, and greybody factors
Excitation factors of long-lived quasinormal modes in horizonless compact objects scale with their small imaginary frequency, suppressing early contributions and producing a hierarchy where prompt ringdown uses ordina...
-
Pre-localization of Massive Black Hole Binaries in the Millihertz Band
A neural spline flow pipeline performs amortized inference on millihertz MBHB signals, delivering ~20 deg² pre-merger sky localizations in ~1 minute while matching PTMCMC sky modes and parameter uncertainties.
-
Hunting Dark Matter with the Einstein Telescope
Clustered primordial black holes may constitute all dark matter and produce a flat stochastic gravitational wave background detectable by the Einstein Telescope.
-
Gravitational-wave parameter estimation to the Moon and back: massive binaries and the case of GW231123
LGWA could observe more than one third of known binary black hole events, detect ~90 mergers per year, and measure chirp mass better than third-generation detectors for massive systems.
-
Freeze-out and spectral running of primordial gravitational waves in viscous cosmology
Shear viscosity adds damping to primordial gravitational waves, producing an extra red tilt for constant viscosity-to-Hubble ratio and a k-dependent blue tilt from freeze-out in the electron-photon-baryon plasma with ...
-
Primary gravitational waves at high frequencies I: Origin of suppression in the power spectrum
Adiabatic regularization combined with smoothed transitions suppresses the high-frequency oscillations in the power spectrum of primary gravitational waves about a zero mean.
-
Dynamical Tidal Response of Non-rotating Black Holes: Connecting the MST Formalism and Worldline EFT
Renormalized dynamical tidal response functions for non-rotating black holes in GR carry inevitable ambiguities from renormalization scheme and flow initial condition, yielding scheme-dependent dynamical tidal Love nu...
-
Not too close! Evaluating the impact of the baseline on the localization of binary black holes by next-generation gravitational-wave detectors
Baselines of 8-11 ms light travel time for two CE detectors provide a reasonable compromise for BBH sky localization, with third detectors eliminating multimodality for most or all events.
-
Accelerating parameter estimation for parameterized tests of general relativity with gravitational-wave observations
Relative binning accelerates TIGER parameterized GR tests by factors of 10-100 while recovering unbiased posteriors on simulated signals and real events like GW150914.
- The Science of the Einstein Telescope
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger
LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., “Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 no. 6, (2016) 061102, arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
-
[2]
GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral
B. P. Abbott et al., “GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 no. 16, (2017) 161101, arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
-
[3]
Gravitational Waves and Gamma-rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A
B. P. Abbott et al., “Gravitational Waves and Gamma-rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A,” Astrophys. J. 848 (2017) L13, arXiv:1710.05834 [astro-ph.HE]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
-
[4]
Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger
B. P. Abbott et al., “Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 848 no. 2, (2017) L12, arXiv:1710.05833 [astro-ph.HE]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
-
[5]
LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, R. Abbott et al., “GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run,” Phys. Rev. X 11 (2021) 021053, arXiv:2010.14527 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021
-
[6]
LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA Collaboration, R. Abbott et al., “GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run,” arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[7]
The population of merging compact binaries inferred using gravitational waves through GWTC-3
LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA Collaboration, R. Abbott et al., “The population of merging compact binaries inferred using gravitational waves through GWTC-3,” arXiv:2111.03634 [astro-ph.HE]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[8]
Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3
LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA Collaboration, R. Abbott et al., “Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3,” arXiv:2112.06861 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[9]
Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA), Astrophys
LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA Collaboration, R. Abbott et al., “Constraints on the cosmic expansion history from GWTC-3,” arXiv:2111.03604 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[10]
Pushing towards the ET sensitivity using 'conventional' technology
S. Hild, S. Chelkowski, and A. Freise, “Pushing towards the ET sensitivity using ’conventional’ technology,” arXiv:0810.0604 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[11]
The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,
M. Punturo et al., “The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,” Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 194002
work page 2010
-
[12]
Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories
S. Hild et al., “Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories,” Class. Quant. Grav. 28 (2011) 094013, arXiv:1012.0908 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
-
[13]
Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO
D. Reitze et al., “Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO,” Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51 no. 7, (2019) 035, arXiv:1907.04833 [astro-ph.IM]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
-
[14]
A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community
M. Evans et al., “A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community,” arXiv:2109.09882 [astro-ph.IM]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[15]
Science Case for the Einstein Telescope
M. Maggiore et al., “Science Case for the Einstein Telescope,” JCAP 2003 (2020) 050, arXiv:1912.02622 [astro-ph.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
-
[16]
Scientific Objectives of Einstein Telescope
B. Sathyaprakash et al., “Scientific Objectives of Einstein Telescope,” Class. Quant. Grav. 29 (2012) 124013, arXiv:1206.0331 [gr-qc] . [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 30, 079501 (2013)]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
-
[17]
F. Iacovelli, M. Mancarella, S. Foffa, and M. Maggiore, “Forecasting the detection capabilities of third-generation gravitational-wave detectors using GWFAST,” Astrophys. J. 941 no. 2, (2022) 208, arXiv:2207.02771 [gr-qc]
-
[18]
S. Ronchini, M. Branchesi, G. Oganesyan, B. Banerjee, U. Dupletsa, G. Ghirlanda, J. Harms, M. Mapelli, and F. Santoliquido, “Perspectives for multimessenger astronomy with the next generation of gravitational-wave detectors and high-energy satellites,” Astron. Astrophys. 665 (2022) A97, arXiv:2204.01746 [astro-ph.HE] . – 161 –
-
[19]
Listening to the Universe with Next Generation Ground-Based Gravitational-Wave Detectors,
S. Borhanian and B. S. Sathyaprakash, “Listening to the Universe with Next Generation Ground-Based Gravitational-Wave Detectors,” arXiv:2202.11048 [gr-qc]
-
[20]
Kalogeraet al., (2021), arXiv:2111.06990 [gr-qc]
V. Kalogera et al., “The Next Generation Global Gravitational Wave Observatory: The Science Book,” arXiv:2111.06990 [gr-qc]
-
[21]
The Sensitivity of Ligo to a Stochastic Background, and its Dependance on the Detector Orientations
E. E. Flanagan, “The Sensitivity of the laser interferometer gravitational wave observatory (LIGO) to a stochastic background, and its dependence on the detector orientations,” Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 2389–2407, arXiv:astro-ph/9305029
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993
-
[22]
N. Christensen, “Optimal detection strategies for measuring the stochastic gravitational radiation background with laser interferometric antennas,” Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 448–454
work page 1997
-
[23]
KAGRA, LIGO Scientific, Virgo, VIRGO Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., “Prospects for observing and localizing gravitational-wave transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA,” Living Reviews in Relativity 23 no. 1, (Sept., 2020) 3
work page 2020
-
[24]
Gravitational-wave physics and astronomy in the 2020s and 2030s,
M. Bailes et al., “Gravitational-wave physics and astronomy in the 2020s and 2030s,” Nature Rev. Phys. 3 no. 5, (2021) 344–366
work page 2021
-
[25]
pygwinc: Gravitational Wave Interferometer Noise Calculator
J. G. Rollins, E. Hall, C. Wipf, and L. McCuller, “pygwinc: Gravitational Wave Interferometer Noise Calculator.” Astrophysics source code library, record ascl:2007.020, July, 2020
work page 2007
-
[26]
P. Jaranowski, A. Krolak, and B. F. Schutz, “Data analysis of gravitational - wave signals from spinning neutron stars. 1. The Signal and its detection,” Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 063001, arXiv:gr-qc/9804014
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
-
[27]
Exploring the Sensitivity of Next Generation Gravitational Wave Detectors
LIGO Scientific Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., “Exploring the Sensitivity of Next Generation Gravitational Wave Detectors,” Class. Quant. Grav. 34 (2017) 044001, arXiv:1607.08697 [astro-ph.IM]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
-
[28]
First higher-multipole model of gravitational waves from spinning and coalescing black-hole binaries
L. London, S. Khan, E. Fauchon-Jones, C. Garc´ ıa, M. Hannam, S. Husa, X. Jim´ enez-Forteza, C. Kalaghatgi, F. Ohme, and F. Pannarale, “First higher-multipole model of gravitational waves from spinning and coalescing black-hole binaries,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 no. 16, (2018) 161102, arXiv:1708.00404 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[29]
Metrics for next-generation gravitational-wave detectors,
E. D. Hall and M. Evans, “Metrics for next-generation gravitational-wave detectors,” Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (2019) 225002, arXiv:1902.09485 [astro-ph.IM]
-
[30]
Borhanian,GWBENCH: a novel Fisher information package for gravitational-wave benchmarking,Class
S. Borhanian, “GWBENCH: a novel Fisher information package for gravitational-wave benchmarking,” Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (2021) 175014, arXiv:2010.15202 [gr-qc]
-
[31]
U. Dupletsa, J. Harms, B. Banerjee, M. Branchesi, B. Goncharov, A. Maselli, A. C. S. Oliveira, S. Ronchini, and J. Tissino, “gwfish: A simulation software to evaluate parameter-estimation capabilities of gravitational-wave detector networks,” Astron. Comput. 42 (2023) 100671, arXiv:2205.02499 [gr-qc]
-
[32]
F. Iacovelli, M. Mancarella, S. Foffa, and M. Maggiore, “ GWFAST: a Fisher information matrix Python code for third-generation gravitational-wave detectors,” Astrophys. J. Suppl. 263 (2022) 2, arXiv:2207.06910 [astro-ph.IM]
-
[33]
Binary Neutron Star Mergers and Third Generation Detectors: Localization and Early Warning
M. L. Chan, C. Messenger, I. S. Heng, and M. Hendry, “Binary Neutron Star Mergers and Third Generation Detectors: Localization and Early Warning,” Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 123014, arXiv:1803.09680 [astro-ph.HE]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[34]
Y. Li, I. S. Heng, M. L. Chan, C. Messenger, and X. Fan, “Exploring the sky localization and early warning capabilities of third generation gravitational wave detectors in three-detector network configurations,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 4, (2022) 043010, arXiv:2109.07389 [astro-ph.IM]. – 162 –
-
[35]
M. Pieroni, A. Ricciardone, and E. Barausse, “Detectability and parameter estimation of stellar origin black hole binaries with next generation gravitational wave detectors,” arXiv:2203.12586 [astro-ph.CO]
-
[36]
M. Vallisneri, “Use and abuse of the Fisher information matrix in the assessment of gravitational-wave parameter-estimation prospects,” Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 042001, arXiv:gr-qc/0703086
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
-
[37]
Inadequacies of the Fisher Information Matrix in gravitational-wave parameter estimation
C. L. Rodriguez, B. Farr, W. M. Farr, and I. Mandel, “Inadequacies of the Fisher Information Matrix in gravitational-wave parameter estimation,” Phys. Rev. D 88 no. 8, (2013) 084013, arXiv:1308.1397 [astro-ph.IM]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
-
[38]
G. Pratten et al., “Computationally efficient models for the dominant and subdominant harmonic modes of precessing binary black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 104056, arXiv:2004.06503 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021
-
[39]
S. Khan, S. Husa, M. Hannam, F. Ohme, M. P¨ urrer, X. Jim´ enez Forteza, and A. Boh´ e, “Frequency-domain gravitational waves from nonprecessing black-hole binaries. II. A phenomenological model for the advanced detector era,” Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 044007, arXiv:1508.07253 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
-
[40]
T. Dietrich, A. Samajdar, S. Khan, N. K. Johnson-McDaniel, R. Dudi, and W. Tichy, “Improving the NRTidal model for binary neutron star systems,” Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 044003, arXiv:1905.06011 [gr-qc]
-
[41]
Detecting gravitational waves from precessing binaries of spinning compact objects: Adiabatic limit
A. Buonanno, Y.-b. Chen, and M. Vallisneri, “Detecting gravitational waves from precessing binaries of spinning compact objects: Adiabatic limit,” Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 104025, arXiv:gr-qc/0211087. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 74, 029904 (2006)]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
-
[42]
L. Wade, J. D. E. Creighton, E. Ochsner, B. D. Lackey, B. F. Farr, T. B. Littenberg, and V. Raymond, “Systematic and statistical errors in a bayesian approach to the estimation of the neutron-star equation of state using advanced gravitational wave detectors,” Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 103012, arXiv:1402.5156 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
-
[43]
The cosmic merger rate of stellar black hole binaries from the Illustris simulation
M. Mapelli, N. Giacobbo, E. Ripamonti, and M. Spera, “The cosmic merger rate of stellar black hole binaries from the Illustris simulation,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 472 no. 2, (2017) 2422–2435, arXiv:1708.05722 [astro-ph.GA]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
-
[44]
N. Giacobbo, M. Mapelli, and M. Spera, “Merging black hole binaries: the effects of progenitor’s metallicity, mass-loss rate and Eddington factor,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 474 no. 3, (2018) 2959–2974, arXiv:1711.03556 [astro-ph.SR]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[45]
The Initial Mass Function and its Variation
P. Kroupa, “The initial mass function and its variation,” ASP Conf. Ser. 285 (2002) 86, arXiv:astro-ph/0102155
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
-
[46]
Binary interaction dominates the evolution of massive stars
H. Sana, S. E. de Mink, A. de Koter, N. Langer, C. J. Evans, M. Gieles, E. Gosset, R. G. Izzard, J. B. L. Bouquin, and F. R. N. Schneider, “Binary interaction dominates the evolution of massive stars,” Science 337 (2012) 444, arXiv:1207.6397 [astro-ph.SR]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
-
[47]
The impact of electron-capture supernovae on merging double neutron stars
N. Giacobbo and M. Mapelli, “The impact of electron-capture supernovae on merging double neutron stars,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 482 no. 2, (2019) 2234–2243, arXiv:1805.11100 [astro-ph.SR]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
-
[48]
Impact of the Rotation and Compactness of Progenitors on the Mass of Black Holes,
M. Mapelli, M. Spera, E. Montanari, M. Limongi, A. Chieffi, N. Giacobbo, A. Bressan, and Y. Bouffanais, “Impact of the Rotation and Compactness of Progenitors on the Mass of Black Holes,” Astrophys. J. 888 (2020) 76, arXiv:1909.01371 [astro-ph.HE]
-
[49]
Compact Remnant Mass Function: Dependence on the Explosion Mechanism and Metallicity
C. L. Fryer, K. Belczynski, G. Wiktorowicz, M. Dominik, V. Kalogera, and D. E. Holz, “Compact Remnant Mass Function: Dependence on the Explosion Mechanism and Metallicity,” Astrophys. J. 749 (2012) 91, arXiv:1110.1726 [astro-ph.SR] . – 163 –
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
-
[50]
Revising natal kick prescriptions in population synthesis simulations,
N. Giacobbo and M. Mapelli, “Revising natal kick prescriptions in population synthesis simulations,” arXiv:1909.06385 [astro-ph.HE]
-
[51]
Evolution of binary stars and the effect of tides on binary populations
J. R. Hurley, C. A. Tout, and O. R. Pols, “Evolution of binary stars and the effect of tides on binary populations,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 329 (2002) 897, arXiv:astro-ph/0201220
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
-
[52]
F. Santoliquido, M. Mapelli, N. Giacobbo, Y. Bouffanais, and M. C. Artale, “The cosmic merger rate density of compact objects: impact of star formation, metallicity, initial mass function and binary evolution,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 502 no. 4, (2021) 4877–4889, arXiv:2009.03911 [astro-ph.HE]
-
[54]
M. Mapelli, Y. Bouffanais, F. Santoliquido, M. A. Sedda, and M. C. Artale, “The cosmic evolution of binary black holes in young, globular, and nuclear star clusters: rates, masses, spins, and mixing fractions,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 511 no. 4, (2022) 5797–5816, arXiv:2109.06222 [astro-ph.HE]
-
[55]
Localization and broadband follow-up of the gravitational-wave transient GW150914
LIGO Scientific, Virgo, ASKAP, BOOTES, DES, Fermi GBM, Fermi-LAT, GRAWITA, INTEGRAL, iPTF, InterPlanetary Network, J-GEM, La Silla-QUEST Survey, Liverpool Telescope, LOFAR, MASTER, MAXI, MWA, Pan-STARRS, PESSTO, Pi of the Sky, SkyMapper, Swift, C2PU, TOROS, VISTA Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., “Localization and broadband follow-up of the gravitationa...
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
-
[57]
K. Nandra et al., “The Hot and Energetic Universe: A White Paper presenting the science theme motivating the Athena+ mission,” arXiv:1306.2307 [astro-ph.HE]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[58]
LSST: from Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products
Z. Ivezi´ c, S. M. Kahn, J. A. Tyson, B. Abel, E. Acosta, R. Allsman, D. Alonso, Y. AlSayyad, S. F. Anderson, J. Andrew, and et al., “LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products,” The Astrophysical Journal 873 (Mar., 2019) 111, arXiv:0805.2366
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
-
[59]
The James Webb Space Telescope
J. P. Gardner et al., “The James Webb Space Telescope,” Space Sci. Rev. 123 (2006) 485, arXiv:astro-ph/0606175
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
-
[60]
R. Gilmozzi and J. Spyromilio, “The 42m European ELT: status,” in Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes II, L. M. Stepp and R. Gilmozzi, eds., vol. 7012 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series , p. 701219. July, 2008
work page 2008
-
[61]
Fundamental physics with the Square Kilometre Array,
A. Weltman, P. Bull, S. Camera, K. Kelley, H. Padmanabhan, J. Pritchard, A. Raccanelli, S. Riemer-Sørensen, L. Shao, S. Andrianomena, E. Athanassoula, D. Bacon, R. Barkana, G. Bertone, C. Bœhm, C. Bonvin, A. Bosma, M. Br¨ uggen, C. Burigana, F. Calore, J. A. R. Cembranos, C. Clarkson, R. M. T. Connors, ´A. d. l. Cruz-Dombriz, P. K. S. Dunsby, J. Fonseca, ...
-
[62]
Science with the Ultraviolet Explorer (UVEX),
S. R. Kulkarni, F. A. Harrison, B. W. Grefenstette, H. P. Earnshaw, I. Andreoni, D. A. Berg, J. S. Bloom, S. B. Cenko, R. Chornock, J. L. Christiansen, M. W. Coughlin, A. Wuollet Criswell, B. Darvish, K. K. Das, K. De, L. Dessart, D. Dixon, B. Dorsman, K. El-Badry, – 164 – C. Evans, K. E. S. Ford, C. Fremling, B. T. Gansicke, S. Gezari, Y. Gotberg, G. M. ...
-
[63]
The THESEUS space mission: science goals, requirements and mission concept,
L. Amati, P. T. O’Brien, D. G¨ otz, E. Bozzo, A. Santangelo, N. Tanvir, F. Frontera, S. Mereghetti, J. P. Osborne, A. Blain, S. Basa, M. Branchesi, L. Burderi, M. Caballero-Garc´ ıa, A. J. Castro-Tirado, L. Christensen, R. Ciolfi, A. De Rosa, V. Doroshenko, A. Ferrara, G. Ghirlanda, L. Hanlon, P. Heddermann, I. Hutchinson, C. Labanti, E. Le Floch, H. Lerm...
-
[64]
The HERMES-Technologic and Scientific Pathfinder,
HERMES-SP, HERMES-TP Collaboration, F. Fiore et al., “The HERMES-Technologic and Scientific Pathfinder,” in SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation 2020 . 1, 2021. arXiv:2101.03078 [astro-ph.HE]
-
[65]
Gamma-ray astrophysics in the MeV range,
A. De Angelis, V. Tatischeff, A. Argan, S. Brandt, A. Bulgarelli, A. Bykov, E. Costantini, R. C. d. Silva, I. A. Grenier, L. Hanlon, D. Hartmann, M. Hernanz, G. Kanbach, I. Kuvvetli, P. Laurent, M. N. Mazziotta, J. McEnery, A. Morselli, K. Nakazawa, U. Oberlack, M. Pearce, J. Rico, M. Tavani, P. v. Ballmoos, R. Walter, X. Wu, S. Zane, A. Zdziarski, and A....
work page 2021
-
[66]
All-sky Medium Energy Gamma-ray Observatory: Exploring the Extreme Multimessenger Universe,
AMEGO Collaboration, R. Caputo et al., “All-sky Medium Energy Gamma-ray Observatory: Exploring the Extreme Multimessenger Universe,” arXiv:1907.07558 [astro-ph.IM]
-
[67]
Gamma-Ray Burst Prompt Emission
B. Zhang, “Gamma-Ray Burst Prompt Emission,” International Journal of Modern Physics D 23 no. 2, (Dec., 2014) 1430002, arXiv:1402.7022 [astro-ph.HE]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
-
[68]
Simulations of early kilonova emission from neutron star mergers,
S. Banerjee, M. Tanaka, K. Kawaguchi, D. Kato, and G. Gaigalas, “Simulations of early kilonova emission from neutron star mergers,” Astrophys. J. 901 no. 1, (2020) 29, arXiv:2008.05495 [astro-ph.HE]
-
[69]
Design of the ULTRASAT UV camera,
A. Asif, M. Barschke, B. Bastian-Querner, D. Berge, R. B¨ uhler, N. De Simone, G. Giavitto, J. M. Haces Crespo, N. Kaipachery, M. Kowalski, S. R. Kulkarni, D. K¨ usters, S. Philipp, H. Prokoph, J. Schliwinski, M. Vasilev, J. J. Watson, S. Worm, F. Zappon, S. Alfassi, S. Ben-Ami, A. Birman, K. Boggs, G. Bredthauer, A. Fenigstein, A. Gal-Yam, D. Ivanov, O. ...
-
[70]
B. Dorsman, G. Raaijmakers, S. B. Cenko, S. Nissanke, L. P. Singer, M. M. Kasliwal, A. L. Piro, E. C. Bellm, D. H. Hartmann, K. Hotokezaka, and K. Luko si¯ ut˙ e, “Prospects of Gravitational Wave Follow-up Through a Wide-field Ultra-violet Satellite: a Dorado Case Study,” arXiv e-prints (June, 2022) arXiv:2206.09696, arXiv:2206.09696 [astro-ph.HE]
-
[71]
Detecting VHE prompt emission from binary neutron-star mergers: ET and CTA synergies,
B. Banerjee, G. Oganesyan, M. Branchesi, U. Dupletsa, F. Aharonian, F. Brighenti, B. Goncharov, J. Harms, M. Mapelli, S. Ronchini, and F. Santoliquido, “Detecting VHE prompt emission from binary neutron-star mergers: ET and CTA synergies,” arXiv e-prints (Dec., 2022) arXiv:2212.14007, arXiv:2212.14007 [astro-ph.HE] . – 165 –
-
[72]
CTA Consortium Collaboration, B. S. Acharya et al., “Introducing the CTA concept,” Astropart. Phys. 43 (2013) 3–18
work page 2013
-
[73]
The Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor
C. Meegan et al., “The Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor,” Astrophys. J. 702 (2009) 791–804, arXiv:0908.0450 [astro-ph.IM]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
-
[74]
Y. Li, X. Wen, X. Sun, X. Liu, X. Liang, D. Guo, W. Peng, K. Gong, G. Li, H. Wang, S. Xiong, J. Liao, H. Lu, J. Wang, Z. An, D. Zhang, M. Gao, G. Chen, Y. Liu, S. Yang, R. Qiao, F. Zhang, X. Zhao, Y. Xu, Y. Zhu, and X. Li, “The GECAM and its payload,” Scientia Sinica Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica 50 no. 12, (Jan., 2020) 129508
work page 2020
-
[75]
B. Patricelli, M. G. Bernardini, M. Mapelli, P. D’Avanzo, F. Santoliquido, G. Cella, M. Razzano, and E. Cuoco, “Prospects for multimessenger detection of binary neutron star mergers in the fourth LIGO–Virgo–KAGRA observing run,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 513 no. 3, (2022) 4159–4168, arXiv:2204.12504 [astro-ph.HE] . [Erratum: Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 514,...
-
[76]
Multi-messenger Observations of Binary Neutron Star Mergers in the O4 Run,
A. Colombo, O. S. Salafia, F. Gabrielli, G. Ghirlanda, B. Giacomazzo, A. Perego, and M. Colpi, “Multi-messenger Observations of Binary Neutron Star Mergers in the O4 Run,” Astrophys. J. 937 no. 2, (2022) 79, arXiv:2204.07592 [astro-ph.HE]
-
[77]
Structured Jets and X-Ray Plateaus in Gamma-Ray Burst Phenomena,
G. Oganesyan, S. Ascenzi, M. Branchesi, O. S. Salafia, S. Dall’Osso, and G. Ghirlanda, “Structured Jets and X-Ray Plateaus in Gamma-Ray Burst Phenomena,” The Astrophysical Journal 893 no. 2, (Apr., 2020) 88, arXiv:1904.08786 [astro-ph.HE]
-
[78]
High-latitude emission from the structured jet of γ-ray bursts observed off-axis,
S. Ascenzi, G. Oganesyan, O. S. Salafia, M. Branchesi, G. Ghirlanda, and S. Dall’Osso, “High-latitude emission from the structured jet of γ-ray bursts observed off-axis,” Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A61, arXiv:2004.12215 [astro-ph.HE]
-
[79]
AT 2017gfo: An Anisotropic and Three-component Kilonova Counterpart of GW170817,
A. Perego, D. Radice, and S. Bernuzzi, “AT 2017gfo: An Anisotropic and Three-component Kilonova Counterpart of GW170817,” ”The Astrophysical Journal Letter” 850 no. 2, (Dec.,
-
[80]
L37, arXiv:1711.03982 [astro-ph.HE]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[81]
Target-of-opportunity Observations of Gravitational-wave Events with Vera C. Rubin Observatory,
I. Andreoni, R. Margutti, O. S. Salafia, B. Parazin, V. A. Villar, M. W. Coughlin, P. Yoachim, K. Mortensen, D. Brethauer, S. J. Smartt, M. M. Kasliwal, K. D. Alexander, S. Anand, E. Berger, M. G. Bernardini, F. B. Bianco, P. K. Blanchard, J. S. Bloom, E. Brocato, M. Bulla, R. Cartier, S. B. Cenko, R. Chornock, C. M. Copperwheat, A. Corsi, F. D’Ammando, P...
-
[82]
LSST Target-of-Opportunity Observations of Gravitational Wave Events: Essential and Efficient
P. S. Cowperthwaite, V. A. Villar, D. M. Scolnic, and E. Berger, “LSST Target-of-opportunity Observations of Gravitational-wave Events: Essential and Efficient,” The Astrophysical Journal 874 no. 1, (Mar., 2019) 88, arXiv:1811.03098 [astro-ph.HE]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.