pith. the verified trust layer for science. sign in

arxiv: 2509.03360 · v2 · submitted 2025-08-30 · ⚛️ physics.soc-ph · gr-qc

The Early Career Workshop of GR-Amaldi 2025

S Al-Shammari , C P L Berry , C E A Chapman-Bird , F T Chowdhury , K Cunningham , M Emma , R Gray , C Hoy
show 13 more authors
I S Heng M Korobko E Maggio A-K Malz H Middleton M Prathaban I M Romero-Shaw G Shaifullah S Singh J Steinlechner K Toland D Williams M J Williams
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 19:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.soc-ph gr-qc
keywords early career workshopgravitational physicscommunity buildingnetworkingGR-Amalditransferable skillsgravitational waves
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Early Career Workshop at GR-Amaldi 2025 delivered overviews of gravitational physics alongside skills training and networking to strengthen the next generation of researchers.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper reports on a three-day workshop organized alongside the GR-Amaldi meeting to connect early-career scientists working in gravitational physics and astronomy. The organizers describe sessions that covered the field's scientific possibilities, core theoretical foundations, and practical career skills while creating structured opportunities for participants to meet peers and mentors. The central aim was to give attendees a wider view of research directions and to encourage lasting connections across institutions and subfields. A sympathetic reader would care because the rapid growth of gravitational-wave science depends on sustaining a skilled and collaborative group of younger researchers.

Core claim

Through its combination of scientific overviews, theoretical introductions, transferable-skills training, and dedicated networking events, the workshop equipped participants with a broad understanding of gravitational physics and astronomy and helped form a more cohesive, collaborative community of early-career researchers.

What carries the argument

The Early Career Workshop program, whose mix of overview lectures, skills sessions, and peer-mentor interactions carries the claim that understanding and community both advanced.

If this is right

  • Early-career researchers gain exposure to a wider range of topics than their own narrow projects.
  • New collaborations form across different institutions and sub-disciplines.
  • Participants acquire practical skills that support career progression outside pure research.
  • The gravitational-physics community becomes more interconnected and less fragmented.
  • Similar events can be repeated at future meetings to maintain momentum.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Repeating the workshop format at regular intervals could help retain talent in the field during periods of rapid observational growth.
  • Measuring the number of joint papers or grant applications that trace back to workshop contacts would test the durability of the reported community effect.
  • Extending the model to include explicit sessions on diversity and inclusion practices might address under-representation without requiring separate events.

Load-bearing premise

The organizers' own account of activities and engagement levels is enough to show that the workshop actually delivered better understanding and stronger community ties.

What would settle it

A follow-up survey in which most participants report they acquired no new overview of the field and formed no new cross-institutional contacts would falsify the claim that the workshop achieved its stated goals.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.03360 by A-K Malz, C E A Chapman-Bird, C Hoy, C P L Berry, D Williams, E Maggio, F T Chowdhury, G Shaifullah, H Middleton, I M Romero-Shaw, I S Heng, J Steinlechner, K Cunningham, K Toland, M Emma, M J Williams, M Korobko, M Prathaban, R Gray, S Al-Shammari, S Singh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Answers to the survey question “How would you rate the workshop overall?”. There were [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Gravitational physics and astronomy have developed rapidly over the last decade, driven by new observations and theoretical breakthroughs. As new as the science and technology of this field are, its greatest asset may be the body of early-career researchers actively engaged in driving it forward. With the aim of bringing together this community of enthusiastic scientists from a broad array of disciplines, the organisers of the GR-Amaldi meeting joined with the Gravitational-Wave Early Career Scientists organisation to create a three-day event-the Early Career Workshop. The Workshop aimed to provide a broad overview of the field's diverse scientific possibilities and introduce key theoretical foundations underpinning its science. To complement developing technical skills, the Workshop also sought to provide participants with transferable skills to aid them in their future careers. The Workshop emphasized networking and community building, offering participants opportunities to engage with peers and mentors. It encouraged interdisciplinary exchanges and cross-institutional collaboration, fostering connections across different research efforts. Collectively, these initiatives aimed to equip participants with a comprehensive understanding of the field's research and to build a more cohesive, collaborative community of early-career researchers. We summarise key points and conclusion from the various activities carried out as part of the Workshop.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes the organization and activities of the three-day Early Career Workshop held in conjunction with the GR-Amaldi 2025 meeting, in collaboration with the Gravitational-Wave Early Career Scientists. It outlines aims to deliver broad overviews of gravitational physics and astronomy, transferable-skills training, networking opportunities, and interdisciplinary exchanges, with the stated goal of equipping participants with comprehensive understanding of the field and fostering a more cohesive, collaborative community of early-career researchers. The paper summarizes key points and conclusions drawn from the sessions and events.

Significance. If the descriptions are accurate, the report provides a useful archival record of community-building efforts in a rapidly evolving field. However, because the manuscript offers only organizer narratives without participant numbers, feedback data, or outcome metrics, its significance for substantiating claims of achieved understanding or community cohesion remains modest and primarily documentary rather than evaluative.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the initiatives 'equipped participants with a comprehensive understanding of the field's research and to build a more cohesive, collaborative community' is presented as a conclusion, yet the manuscript supplies no supporting evidence such as participant surveys, pre/post knowledge assessments, collaboration follow-ups, or quantitative engagement statistics.
  2. [Summary of activities] Summary of activities (throughout): organizer descriptions of sessions on gravitational physics, skills training, and networking are provided, but the text contains no data on attendance, session participation rates, or measured outcomes, leaving the central claim of successful community building unsupported.
minor comments (2)
  1. Add a dedicated section or paragraph stating the total number of participants and their institutional or disciplinary distribution, if such information was collected.
  2. Clarify the manuscript's purpose: whether it is intended solely as a descriptive record or as an assessment of workshop effectiveness.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on our manuscript. We clarify that this is a descriptive report on the workshop rather than an empirical study of its outcomes. Below we address each major comment and describe the revisions we will implement.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the initiatives 'equipped participants with a comprehensive understanding of the field's research and to build a more cohesive, collaborative community' is presented as a conclusion, yet the manuscript supplies no supporting evidence such as participant surveys, pre/post knowledge assessments, collaboration follow-ups, or quantitative engagement statistics.

    Authors: We agree with this observation. The abstract was written to reflect the workshop's goals, but it does not include evidence to support these as achieved results. In the revised manuscript, we will modify the abstract to describe the aims of the workshop and note that the paper summarizes the activities and key points from the sessions, without claiming verified impacts on participants' understanding or community cohesion. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Summary of activities] Summary of activities (throughout): organizer descriptions of sessions on gravitational physics, skills training, and networking are provided, but the text contains no data on attendance, session participation rates, or measured outcomes, leaving the central claim of successful community building unsupported.

    Authors: The manuscript focuses on providing an overview of the sessions and the topics covered, based on the organizers' perspective. We did not collect or include quantitative metrics because the report is not positioned as an evaluation of the workshop's success. We will revise the text to explicitly state the descriptive nature of the account and avoid language that implies measured success in community building. If basic attendance information is available, it will be added for context. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • The manuscript does not include participant surveys or outcome metrics, and we are unable to provide such data without conducting additional post-event assessments.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Descriptive workshop report contains no derivations, predictions or load-bearing self-citations

full rationale

The paper is a purely descriptive organizational report summarizing the aims, sessions, networking events and organizer conclusions of the Early Career Workshop. It contains no equations, no fitted parameters, no quantitative predictions, and no derivation chain that reduces to its own inputs. Claims about providing understanding and building community are stated as workshop aims and activity summaries rather than results derived from data or prior self-citations. No self-citation load-bearing steps, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes appear. The document is self-contained as a factual event report with no mathematical or predictive content that could exhibit circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

No mathematical content, free parameters, or new entities are present. The report rests on the domain assumption that the described activities met their intended goals from the organizers' viewpoint.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The workshop activities successfully equipped participants and built community as intended
    Invoked in the final summary sentence of the abstract without supporting metrics or external validation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5813 in / 1090 out tokens · 71631 ms · 2026-05-18T19:21:33.948199+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · 31 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger

    Abbott B P et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo) 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 061102 (Preprint 1602.03837)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    Tests of general relativity with GW150914

    Abbott B P et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo) 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 221101 [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 129902 (2018)] (Preprint 1602.03841)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3

    Abbott R et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA) 2021 arXiv e-prints (Preprint 2112.06861)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    GWTC-4.0: An Introduction to Version 4.0 of the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog

    Abac A G et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA) 2025 arXiv e-prints (Preprint 2508.18080)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

    Abbott R et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA) 2023 Phys. Rev. X 13 041039 ( Preprint 2111.03606)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run

    Abac A G et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA) 2025 arXiv e-prints (Preprint 2508.18082)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    LSST: from Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products

    Ivezi´ cˇZ et al. (LSST) 2019 Astrophys. J. 873 111 (Preprint 0805.2366)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    Zhang Y and Zhao Y 2015 Data Sci. J. 14 11

    work page 2015

  9. [9]

    Deep Learning for Multi-Messenger Astrophysics: A Gateway for Discovery in the Big Data Era

    Allen G et al. 2019 arXiv e-prints (Preprint 1902.00522)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. II. Array and Instrumentation

    Akiyama K et al. (Event Horizon Telescope) 2019 Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 L2 (Preprint 1906.11239)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    2022 Machine Learning and Cosmology Snowmass 2021 (Preprint 2203.08056)

    Dvorkin C et al. 2022 Machine Learning and Cosmology Snowmass 2021 (Preprint 2203.08056)

    work page arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    Cuoco E, Cavagli` a M, Heng I S, Keitel D and Messenger C 2025 Living Rev. Rel. 28 2 (Preprint 2412.15046)

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Advanced LIGO

    Aasi J et al. (LIGO Scientific) 2015 Class. Quant. Grav. 32 074001 (Preprint 1411.4547)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  14. [14]

    Advanced Virgo: a 2nd generation interferometric gravitational wave detector

    Acernese F et al. (Virgo) 2015 Class. Quant. Grav. 32 024001 (Preprint 1408.3978)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  15. [15]

    (KAGRA) 2019 Nature Astron

    Akutsu T et al. (KAGRA) 2019 Nature Astron. 3 35–40 (Preprint 1811.08079)

    work page arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    LISA Definition Study Report

    Colpi M et al. (LISA) 2024 arXiv preprint (Preprint 2402.07571)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    (LISA) 2023 Living Rev

    Amaro Seoane P et al. (LISA) 2023 Living Rev. Rel. 26 2 (Preprint 2203.06016)

    work page arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    (LISA) 2023 Living Rev

    Auclair P et al. (LISA) 2023 Living Rev. Rel. 26 5 (Preprint 2204.05434)

    work page arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    (LISA) 2022 Living Rev

    Arun K G et al. (LISA) 2022 Living Rev. Rel. 25 4 (Preprint 2205.01597)

    work page arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-Wave Background

    Agazie G et al. (NANOGrav) 2023 Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 L8 (Preprint 2306.16213)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array III. Search for gravitational wave signals

    Antoniadis J et al. (EPTA, InPTA) 2023 Astron. Astrophys. 678 A50 (Preprint 2306.16214)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Search for an isotropic gravitational-wave background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array

    Reardon D J et al. 2023 Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 L6 (Preprint 2306.16215)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Searching for the nano-Hertz stochastic gravitational wave background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I

    Xu H et al. 2023 Res. Astron. Astrophys. 23 075024 (Preprint 2306.16216)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    (International Pulsar Timing Array) 2024 Astrophys

    Agazie G et al. (International Pulsar Timing Array) 2024 Astrophys. J. 966 105 ( Preprint 2309.00693)

    work page arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole

    Akiyama K et al. (Event Horizon Telescope) 2019 Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 L1 (Preprint 1906.11238)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  26. [26]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way

    Akiyama K et al. (Event Horizon Telescope) 2022 Astrophys. J. Lett. 930 L12 (Preprint 2311.08680)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    (Euclid) 2025 arXiv e-prints (Preprint 2503.15302)

    Aussel H et al. (Euclid) 2025 arXiv e-prints (Preprint 2503.15302)

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant

    Abbott B P et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, 1M2H, Dark Energy Camera GW-E, DES, DLT40, Las Cumbres Observatory, VINROUGE, MASTER) 2017 Nature 551 85–88 (Preprint 1710.05835)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  29. [29]

    Margutti R and Chornock R 2021 Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 59 155–202 (Preprint 2012.04810)

    work page arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    Engel K, Lewis T, Muzio M S and Venters T M 2022 Advancing the Landscape of Multimessenger Science in the Next Decade Snowmass 2021 (Preprint 2203.10074)

    work page arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    Nicholl M and Andreoni I 2025 Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 383 20240126 (Preprint 2410.18274)

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Smith G H 2016 Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 128 124502

    work page 2016

  33. [33]

    Battiston F, Musciotto F, Wang D, Barab´ asi A L, Szell M and Sinatra R 2019 Nature Rev. Phys. 1 89–97 (Preprint 1901.02789)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  34. [34]

    Janssens K and Ueda M 2023 arXiv preprint (Preprint 2308.05107)

    work page arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    2024 arXiv e-prints (Preprint 2404.02074)

    Allen J et al. 2024 arXiv e-prints (Preprint 2404.02074)

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    2022 Hum

    Sanders K et al. 2022 Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 32 100793

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Agarwal G, Barrow J L, Carneiro M F, Conley E, da Silva Pereira M E, Hedges S, Homiller S, Lepetic I and Luo T 2022 Snowmass 2021 Community Survey Report Snowmass 2021 (Preprint 2203.07328)

    work page arXiv 2022

  38. [38]

    2024 PNAS Nexus 3 pgae143 (Preprint 2405.00104)

    Gokus A et al. 2024 PNAS Nexus 3 pgae143 (Preprint 2405.00104)

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [40]

    Mohin M, Kunzwa L and Patel S 2022 Int. J. Educ. Policy Res. Rev. 9 48–57

    work page 2022

  40. [41]

    Khan M A 2025 Int. J. Chang. Educ

    work page 2025

  41. [42]

    21 34–39

    Chlup D T and Collins T E 2010 Adult Learn. 21 34–39

    work page 2010

  42. [43]

    Ravn I and Elsborg S 2011 Int. J. Learn. Chang. 5 84–98

    work page 2011

  43. [44]

    Israel W 1967 Phys. Rev. 164 1776–1779

    work page 1967

  44. [45]

    Carter B 1971 Phys. Rev. Lett. 26 331–333

    work page 1971

  45. [46]

    Robinson D C 1975 Phys. Rev. Lett. 34 905–906

    work page 1975

  46. [47]

    Measuring Distance and Properties of the Milky Way's Central Supermassive Black Hole with Stellar Orbits

    Ghez A M et al. 2008 Astrophys. J. 689 1044–1062 (Preprint 0808.2870)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  47. [48]

    (GRAVITY) 2023 Astron

    Abuter R et al. (GRAVITY) 2023 Astron. Astrophys. 677 L10 (Preprint 2307.11821)

    work page arXiv 2023

  48. [49]

    Berti E, Cardoso V and Will C M 2006 Phys. Rev. D 73 064030 (Preprint gr-qc/0512160)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  49. [50]

    The Fast and the Frame-Dragging: Efficient waveforms for asymmetric-mass eccentric equatorial inspirals into rapidly-spinning black holes

    Chapman-Bird C E A et al. 2025 arXiv e-prints (Preprint 2506.09470)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  50. [51]

    Baumgarte T W and Shapiro S L 2021 Numerical Relativity: Starting from Scratch (Cambridge University Press)

    work page 2021

  51. [52]

    Aurrekoetxea J C, Clough K and Lim E A 2025 Living Rev. Rel. 28 5 (Preprint 2409.01939)

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [53]

    Bonne N J, Gupta J A, Krawczyk C M and Masters K L 2018 Astron. Geophys. 59 1.30–1.33 (Preprint 2111.15596)

    work page arXiv 2018

  53. [54]

    Middleton H et al. 2024 J. Sci. Comm. 23 N03 (Preprint 2407.18638)

    work page arXiv 2024

  54. [55]

    Stevance H 2021 Be concise, yet precise doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4547904

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.4547904 2021

  55. [56]

    Carlip S 2023 Rept. Prog. Phys. 86 066001 (Preprint 2209.14282)

    work page arXiv 2023

  56. [57]

    Chatziioannou K, Dent T, Fishbach M, Ohme F, P¨ urrer M, Raymond V and Veitch J 2024 arXiv e-prints (Preprint 2409.02037)

    work page arXiv 2024

  57. [58]

    GWTC-4.0: Methods for Identifying and Characterizing Gravitational-wave Transients

    Abac A G et al. (LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA) 2025 arXiv e-prints (Preprint 2508.18081)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  58. [59]

    Metzger B D 2020 Living Rev. Rel. 23 1 (Preprint 1910.01617)

    work page arXiv 2020

  59. [60]

    Vigliano A A and Longo F 2024 Universe 10 57

    work page 2024

  60. [61]

    Gezari S 2021 Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 59 21–58 (Preprint 2104.14580)

    work page arXiv 2021

  61. [62]

    Freedman W L 2021 Astrophys. J. 919 16 (Preprint 2106.15656)

    work page arXiv 2021

  62. [64]

    2024 Open J

    Chiu I N et al. 2024 Open J. Astrophys. 7 2305.17173 (Preprint 2406.11970)

    work page arXiv 2024

  63. [65]

    DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations

    Adame A G et al. (DESI) 2025 J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 021 (Preprint 2404.03002)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  64. [66]

    (Euclid) 2020 Astron

    Blanchard A et al. (Euclid) 2020 Astron. Astrophys. 642 A191 (Preprint 1910.09273)

    work page arXiv 2020

  65. [67]

    Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations

    Berti E et al. 2015 Class. Quant. Grav. 32 243001 (Preprint 1501.07274)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  66. [68]

    Freire P C C and Wex N 2024 Living Rev. Rel. 27 5 (Preprint 2407.16540)

    work page arXiv 2024

  67. [69]

    Yazadjiev S S and Doneva D D 2025 Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 34 2530004 (Preprint 2505.01038)

    work page arXiv 2025

  68. [70]

    Guptaet al., SciPost Phys

    Gupta A et al. 2024 SciPost Phys. Comm. Rep. 5 (Preprint 2405.02197)

    work page arXiv 2024

  69. [71]

    Kwok J Y L, Lo R K L, Weinstein A J and Li T G F 2022 Phys. Rev. D 105 024066 ( Preprint 2109.07642)

    work page arXiv 2022

  70. [72]

    Prospects for Observing and Localizing Gravitational-Wave Transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA

    Abbott B P et al. (KAGRA, LIGO Scientific, Virgo) 2020 Living Rev. Rel. 23 3 (Preprint 1304.0670)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  71. [73]

    2021 arXiv preprint (Preprint 2111.06990)

    Kalogera V et al. 2021 arXiv preprint (Preprint 2111.06990)

    work page arXiv 2021

  72. [74]

    The Science of the Einstein Telescope

    Abac A et al. (Einstein Telescope) 2025 arXiv e-prints (Preprint 2503.12263)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  73. [75]

    Seto N, Kawamura S and Nakamura T 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 221103 (Preprint astro-ph/0108011)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  74. [76]

    Space Based Gravitational Wave Astronomy Beyond LISA

    Baker J et al. 2019 Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51 243 (Preprint 1907.11305)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  75. [77]

    Luo Z, Wang Y, Wu Y, Hu W and Jin G 2021 PTEP 2021 05A108

    work page 2021

  76. [78]

    2025 Class

    Luo J et al. 2025 Class. Quant. Grav. 42 173001 (Preprint 2502.11328)

    work page arXiv 2025

  77. [79]

    The International Pulsar Timing Array: First Data Release

    Verbiest J P W et al. 2016 Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 458 1267–1288 (Preprint 1602.03640)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016