Recognition: 2 theorem links
· Lean TheoremPennyLane: Automatic differentiation of hybrid quantum-classical computations
Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:09 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
PennyLane enables automatic differentiation for hybrid quantum-classical programs by making gradients of variational quantum circuits compatible with classical backpropagation.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
PennyLane is a Python 3 software framework for differentiable programming of quantum computers. The library provides a unified architecture for near-term quantum computing devices, supporting both qubit and continuous-variable paradigms. PennyLane's core feature is the ability to compute gradients of variational quantum circuits in a way that is compatible with classical techniques such as backpropagation. PennyLane thus extends the automatic differentiation algorithms common in optimization and machine learning to include quantum and hybrid computations. A plugin system makes the framework compatible with any gate-based quantum simulator or hardware.
What carries the argument
Gradient computation for variational quantum circuits that remains compatible with classical backpropagation, supported by a plugin system for connecting to quantum simulators and hardware.
Load-bearing premise
The plugin system provides seamless, accurate, and efficient interfacing with arbitrary gate-based quantum simulators or hardware without introducing significant numerical or performance issues.
What would settle it
Compute the gradient of a simple parameterized quantum circuit both analytically and through PennyLane on the same simulator, then check whether the two results match within numerical tolerance.
read the original abstract
PennyLane is a Python 3 software framework for differentiable programming of quantum computers. The library provides a unified architecture for near-term quantum computing devices, supporting both qubit and continuous-variable paradigms. PennyLane's core feature is the ability to compute gradients of variational quantum circuits in a way that is compatible with classical techniques such as backpropagation. PennyLane thus extends the automatic differentiation algorithms common in optimization and machine learning to include quantum and hybrid computations. A plugin system makes the framework compatible with any gate-based quantum simulator or hardware. We provide plugins for hardware providers including the Xanadu Cloud, Amazon Braket, and IBM Quantum, allowing PennyLane optimizations to be run on publicly accessible quantum devices. On the classical front, PennyLane interfaces with accelerated machine learning libraries such as TensorFlow, PyTorch, JAX, and Autograd. PennyLane can be used for the optimization of variational quantum eigensolvers, quantum approximate optimization, quantum machine learning models, and many other applications.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript introduces PennyLane, a Python 3 software framework for differentiable programming of quantum computers. It provides a unified architecture supporting both qubit and continuous-variable quantum devices via a plugin system, with the core capability being automatic differentiation of variational quantum circuits that integrates with classical backpropagation and machine-learning libraries such as TensorFlow, PyTorch, JAX, and Autograd. The framework is positioned for applications including VQE, QAOA, and quantum machine learning, with plugins enabling execution on hardware from Xanadu, Amazon Braket, and IBM Quantum.
Significance. If the described architecture and gradient interfaces function as claimed, PennyLane would be a notable contribution by extending classical automatic-differentiation techniques to hybrid quantum-classical settings, thereby lowering the barrier to gradient-based optimization of near-term quantum algorithms. The open-source plugin design and explicit compatibility with multiple hardware providers and ML frameworks are concrete strengths that could accelerate reproducible research in variational quantum methods.
major comments (2)
- [§3] §3 (core architecture) and the gradient section: the central claim that quantum gradients are computed in a manner fully compatible with classical backpropagation relies on the parameter-shift rule and the plugin interface, yet the manuscript provides no explicit derivation or pseudocode showing how the quantum gradient tensor is inserted into the classical computational graph; without this, it is difficult to verify that the hybrid differentiation is free of hidden assumptions about device noise or shot statistics.
- [§4] §4 (plugin system) and associated tables/figures: the assertion of seamless interfacing with arbitrary simulators and hardware is load-bearing for the unified-architecture claim, but the text supplies no quantitative benchmarks (runtime, gradient accuracy, or memory overhead) across the listed providers; this omission leaves open whether numerical or performance artifacts are introduced when switching devices.
minor comments (2)
- [Figure 1] Figure 1 and the accompanying caption: the schematic of the hybrid computation graph would benefit from explicit labeling of the quantum-to-classical gradient hand-off point to improve readability for readers unfamiliar with the parameter-shift implementation.
- [Abstract] The abstract states that PennyLane 'extends the automatic differentiation algorithms' but does not cite the specific classical AD libraries' gradient interfaces (e.g., TensorFlow's GradientTape) that are being extended; adding one or two references would clarify the novelty.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their positive evaluation and recommendation of minor revision. The comments identify opportunities to strengthen the presentation of the hybrid differentiation mechanism and the plugin architecture. We address each point below and will incorporate clarifications and additional material in the revised manuscript.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [§3] §3 (core architecture) and the gradient section: the central claim that quantum gradients are computed in a manner fully compatible with classical backpropagation relies on the parameter-shift rule and the plugin interface, yet the manuscript provides no explicit derivation or pseudocode showing how the quantum gradient tensor is inserted into the classical computational graph; without this, it is difficult to verify that the hybrid differentiation is free of hidden assumptions about device noise or shot statistics.
Authors: We appreciate this request for greater explicitness. Section 3 presents the parameter-shift rule, which yields exact gradients for gates of the form exp(-iθG) where G has eigenvalues ±1 and requires no finite-difference approximation or assumptions about device noise. The resulting gradient tensor is returned by the QNode and is directly consumable by classical autodiff frameworks because PennyLane registers it as a differentiable operation. To address the referee’s concern, we will add a short pseudocode listing and a schematic diagram in the revised §3 that shows the sequence: (1) forward pass on the quantum device, (2) parameter-shift evaluations, (3) assembly of the gradient tensor, and (4) insertion into the classical computational graph. Regarding shot statistics, the number of shots is an explicit device parameter; the gradient estimator inherits the same shot noise as the expectation-value estimator, which is already documented in the device interface. No hidden assumptions about noise models are made. revision: yes
-
Referee: [§4] §4 (plugin system) and associated tables/figures: the assertion of seamless interfacing with arbitrary simulators and hardware is load-bearing for the unified-architecture claim, but the text supplies no quantitative benchmarks (runtime, gradient accuracy, or memory overhead) across the listed providers; this omission leaves open whether numerical or performance artifacts are introduced when switching devices.
Authors: We agree that quantitative evidence would reinforce the claim of seamless interfacing. The manuscript emphasizes the architectural design and provides usage examples, but does not contain systematic cross-device benchmarks. In the revision we will add a concise benchmark subsection (or table) that reports wall-clock time, gradient accuracy relative to analytic values, and peak memory usage for a representative variational circuit executed on the default.qubit simulator, the Strawberry Fields simulator, and the IBM Qiskit simulator. These results will demonstrate that the core PennyLane layer introduces negligible overhead and that numerical fidelity is preserved across backends, as the plugin layer only translates the circuit and returns expectation values. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity: software framework with no load-bearing derivations
full rationale
The paper presents PennyLane as a Python framework for differentiable quantum programming, with its central claim being the extension of automatic differentiation (via parameter-shift rules and backpropagation interfaces) to hybrid quantum-classical circuits through a plugin architecture. No equations, fitted parameters, or uniqueness theorems are invoked as derivations; the contribution is architectural and implementational. Claims about gradient computation and device compatibility are statements of provided functionality rather than predictions that reduce to inputs by construction. Self-citations (if any) are not load-bearing for any result, as the paper is self-contained in describing its own interfaces without relying on prior author work to force outcomes. This is a normal non-finding for a software library paper.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Parameterized quantum circuits admit well-defined gradients with respect to their parameters that can be computed via automatic differentiation techniques.
Forward citations
Cited by 60 Pith papers
-
Qvine: Vine Structured Quantum Circuits for Loading High Dimensional Distributions
Qvine uses vine copula-inspired quantum circuit structures to achieve linear or quadratic depth scaling for loading high-dimensional distributions with high approximation quality.
-
QLAM: A Quantum Long-Attention Memory Approach to Long-Sequence Token Modeling
QLAM extends state-space models with quantum superposition in the hidden state for linear-time long-sequence modeling and reports consistent gains over RNN and transformer baselines on sequential image tasks.
-
Optimal FALQON for Quantum Approximate Optimization via Layer-wise Parameter Tuning
Optimal FALQON optimizes per-layer δ_k and M_k via classical methods, yielding statistically significant gains in success probability and efficiency over standard FALQON on 94 non-isomorphic 3-regular graphs with 12 vertices.
-
Gated QKAN-FWP: Scalable Quantum-inspired Sequence Learning
Gated QKAN-FWP combines fast weight programming with quantum-inspired Kolmogorov-Arnold networks via single-qubit DARUAN activations and gated updates to deliver a 12.5k-parameter model that outperforms larger classic...
-
Architecture Shape Governs QNN Trainability: Jacobian Null Space Growth and Parameter Efficiency
At fixed encoding budget, serial QNN architectures suffer unbounded structural gradient starvation via rank(J) ≤ 2L+1 while parallel ones keep full Jacobian rank and better parameter efficiency when adding feature-map layers.
-
Randomized and Diverse Input State Generation for Quantum Program Testing
The hardware-compatible Brick-Circuit generator produces quantum test states with higher expressibility and entanglement than existing generators at shallower circuit depths.
-
Quantum Interval Bound Propagation for Certified Training of Quantum Neural Networks
QIBP adapts interval bound propagation to quantum neural networks for certified adversarial robustness via interval and affine arithmetic implementations.
-
Beyond Single Trajectories: Optimal Control and Jordan-Lie Algebra in Hybrid Quantum Walks for Combinatorial Optimization
Hybrid quantum walks with optimal dynamical coin operators outperform QAOA on Max-Cut and MIS by accessing a strictly larger Jordan-Lie algebra that enables faster convergence and higher accuracy.
-
Graph-Conditioned Meta-Optimizer for QAOA Parameter Generation on Multiple Problem Classes
A graph-conditioned meta-optimizer learns QAOA parameter trajectories from one problem class and transfers them to others, yielding better initializations than standard methods in an empirical study of 64 settings.
-
Architecture-aware Unitary Synthesis
A new method for unitary synthesis on quantum hardware cuts CNOT gates by up to 36% and compiles up to 553 times faster than standard tools on square and heavy-hex lattices.
-
Q-SINDy: Quantum-Kernel Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamics with Provable Coefficient Debiasing
Q-SINDy adds quantum kernels to SINDy and proves that orthogonalization eliminates coefficient cannibalization bias exactly, recovering equations as accurately as classical SINDy on six tested systems.
-
Lund Plane to Bloch (LP2B) Encoding for Object and Polarization Tagging with Quantum Jet Substructure
LP2B encoding converts Lund plane jet representations into Bloch sphere qubit states, enabling a QTTN that matches classical LundNet performance on polarization tagging and W/top tagging with three orders of magnitude...
-
Variational Quantum Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Hydrological PDE-Constrained Learning with Inherent Uncertainty Quantification
Hybrid quantum PINN for hydrology reports 3x faster convergence and 44% fewer parameters than classical PINN on Sri Lankan flood data while using physics constraints for uncertainty quantification.
-
A hardware efficient quantum residual neural network without post-selection
A quantum residual neural network implements skip connections via fixed linear mixing of identity and variational circuits, achieving 99% binary and 80% multi-class image classification accuracy with 10x fewer gates t...
-
Broken Quantum: A Systematic Formal Verification Study of Security Vulnerabilities Across the Open-Source Quantum Computing Simulator Ecosystem
A formal audit of 45 quantum simulators identifies 547 vulnerabilities across memory corruption, resource exhaustion, code injection, and a new QASM injection class, with all patterns verified by Z3 SAT proofs.
-
Hybrid Fourier Neural Operator for Surrogate Modeling of Laser Processing with a Quantum-Circuit Mixer
HQ-LP-FNO replaces part of the spectral channel mixing in a 3D FNO with a mode-shared VQC, reducing parameters by 15.6% and phase-fraction MAE by 26% on laser-processing surrogates while remaining stable under calibra...
-
A QPINN Framework with Quantum Trainable Embeddings for the Lid-Driven Cavity Problem
QPINN framework with QNN-based trainable embeddings solves the lid-driven cavity problem with stable training, competitive accuracy, and fewer parameters than classical PINNs.
-
Don't Get Your Kroneckers in a Twist: Gaussian Processes on High-Dimensional Incomplete Grids
CUTS-GPR performs numerically exact Gaussian process regression with near-linear scaling in training points N and low-order polynomial scaling in dimensions D by exploiting additive kernels on incomplete grids.
-
The power of entanglement in distributed quantum machine learning
Entanglement improves classification accuracy in distributed quantum ML tasks across datasets, but excessive amounts degrade performance by reducing effective parameter dimension.
-
Quantum Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning via Variational Quantum Circuits
Hybrid agent with variational quantum circuits for feature extraction in hierarchical RL outperforms classical baselines with 66% parameter savings, but quantum value estimation degrades results.
-
Quantum Tilted Loss in Variational Optimization: Theory and Applications
QTL unifies expectation-value minimization with CVaR and Gibbs heuristics under one tunable operator, amplifying gradients in structured cases while preserving global minima and shifting the bottleneck to measurement ...
-
Geometric Quantum Physics Informed Neural Network
GQPINNs add symmetry awareness to quantum PINNs via equivariant circuits, yielding lower mean absolute error and fewer parameters than standard QPINNs on linear and nonlinear PDE benchmarks.
-
Towards Real-time Control of a CartPole System on a Quantum Computer
A single-qubit quantum reinforcement learning agent solves CartPole faster than classical networks and quantifies shot-count versus control-frequency requirements for real-time closed-loop control on NISQ hardware, in...
-
Universality of Quantum Gates in Particle and Symmetry Constrained Subspaces
Hardware-efficient gates are universal for state preparation in particle-number and symmetry-constrained subspaces because commutators generate Pauli Z projectors that span the full so(w) and su(w) algebras.
-
Defending Quantum Classifiers against Adversarial Perturbations through Quantum Autoencoders
A quantum autoencoder purifies adversarial perturbations for quantum classifiers and supplies a confidence score for unrecoverable inputs, claiming up to 68% accuracy gains over prior defenses without adversarial training.
-
Controlled Steering-Based State Preparation for Adversarial-Robust Quantum Machine Learning
A passive steering method for quantum state preparation improves adversarial accuracy in QML models by up to 40% across tested cases.
-
QuanForge: A Mutation Testing Framework for Quantum Neural Networks
QuanForge introduces statistical mutation killing and nine post-training mutation operators for QNNs to distinguish test suites and localize vulnerable circuit regions.
-
Assessing System Capabilities and Bottlenecks of an Early Fault-Tolerant Bicycle Architecture
Syn@fac optimization reduces estimated circuit failure probability by a factor of 9 on average across non-Clifford benchmarks for bivariate bicycle code modular FTQC architectures, with additional gains from transvect...
-
Block-encodings as programming abstractions: The Eclipse Qrisp BlockEncoding Interface
The Eclipse Qrisp BlockEncoding interface provides high-level programming abstractions for block-encodings, enabling easier implementation of quantum algorithms such as QSVT, matrix inversion, and Hamiltonian simulation.
-
Hierarchical Progressive Pauli Noise Modeling with Residual Compensation for Multi-Qubit Quantum Circuits
HPO framework reduces multi-qubit Pauli noise characterization complexity from O(4^N) to O(N·4^w) with 96.3% parameter compression on 5 qubits and raises 10-qubit HHL fidelity from 0.7431 to 0.9381.
-
Double Descent in Quantum Kernel Ridge Regression
Quantum kernel ridge regression shows double descent in test risk, with the interpolation peak suppressible by regularization, via random matrix theory asymptotics in the high-dimensional limit.
-
Observable-Guided Generator Selection for Improving Trainability in Quantum Machine Learning with a $ \mathfrak{g} $-Purity Interpretation under Restricted Settings
Observable-guided selection of anti-commuting Pauli generators improves training speed in 5-qubit QML circuits and admits a g-purity interpretation under restricted algebraic assumptions.
-
QLLVM: A Scalable Quantum-Classical Co-Compilation Framework based on LLVM
QLLVM delivers an LLVM-based end-to-end co-compiler that unifies classical HPC and quantum programs into one executable, with a three-stage quantum path via MLIR and QIR that reduces circuit depth and gate counts on M...
-
Learning to Concatenate Quantum Codes
A machine-learning approach adaptively chooses quantum code sequences for concatenation to achieve target logical error rates with far fewer qubits than standard methods for structured noise.
-
Parameter-efficient Quantum Multi-task Learning
QMTL uses shared VQC encoding plus task-specific quantum ansatz heads to achieve linear parameter scaling with the number of tasks while matching or exceeding classical multi-task baselines on three benchmarks.
-
Quantum-Enhanced Single-Parameter Phase Estimation with Adaptive NOON States
Optimizing eight circuit parameters via gradient descent on classical Fisher information yields up to 1598% CFI gains and 133x more useful events per pulse for N=5 NOON states, pushing performance closer to the Heisen...
-
Adaptive H-EFT-VA: A Provably Safe Trajectory Through the Trainability-Expressibility Landscape of Variational Quantum Algorithms
Adaptive H-EFT-VA maintains gradient variance Omega(1/poly(N)) during safe Hilbert space expansion, doubling fidelity over static H-EFT-VA on benchmarks up to 14 qubits.
-
Quantum Patches: Enhancing Robustness of Quantum Machine Learning Models
Random quantum circuits used as adversarial training data reduce successful attack rates on QML models for CIFAR-10 from 89.8% to 68.45% and for CINIC-10 from 94.23% to 78.68%.
-
Shot-Based Quantum Encoding: A Data-Loading Paradigm for Quantum Neural Networks
SBQE encodes data via learnable shot distributions over initial states to form mixed quantum representations, achieving 89.1% accuracy on Semeion and 80.95% on Fashion MNIST without encoding gates.
-
Molecular Excited States using Quantum Subspace Methods: Accuracy, Resource Reduction, and Error-Mitigated Hardware Implementation of q-sc-EOM
Optimized q-sc-EOM on quantum hardware yields accurate excited-state energies for challenging molecular bond-breaking cases after reducing measurement scaling to O(N^5) and applying readout and symmetry error mitigation.
-
Eliminating Vendor Lock-In in Quantum Machine Learning via Framework-Agnostic Neural Networks
A new QNN architecture with unified graph, HAL, and ONNX pipeline enables cross-framework and cross-hardware QML with training time within 8% of native implementations and identical accuracy on Iris, Wine, and MNIST-4 tasks.
-
Wavelet Variance Equipartition as a Threshold for World-Model Quality and Quantum Kernel TN-Simulability
Wavelet scaling α = 1/2 separates classically simulable area-law from volume-law phases for quantum kernels in world-model latents, with empirical VideoMAE latents and a Θ(d^{-2}) variance bound implying simulation ha...
-
Classic and Quantum Task-Based Intelligent Runtime for QIRs Running on Multiple QPUs
A hybrid runtime system merges classical task scheduling with quantum execution to enable concurrent QIR program dispatch to multiple QPUs and simulators, demonstrated through circuit cutting on 4- and 20-qubit examples.
-
The Quantum Hamiltonian Analysis Toolkit: Lowering the Barrier to Quantum Computing with Hamiltonians
QHAT is a user-friendly software toolkit for Hamiltonian generation, analysis, and fault-tolerant quantum simulation driven by error tolerances rather than algorithmic parameters.
-
Measuring Accuracy and Energy-to-Solution of Quantum Fine-Tuning of Foundational AI Models
Trapped-ion quantum fine-tuning of AI models shows linear energy scaling and 24% better classification error than classical logistic regression or SVM baselines, with a projected energy break-even at 34 qubits.
-
On the importance of hyperparameters in initializing parameterized quantum circuits
An evolutionary algorithm optimizes initialization hyperparameters for quantum circuits, leading to faster convergence without worsening barren plateaus.
-
Quantum-HPC Software Stacks and the openQSE Reference Architecture: A Survey
A survey of nine QHPC stacks identifies common patterns and proposes the openQSE reference architecture to unify interfaces for interoperability in quantum-HPC environments.
-
Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Maximizing Quantum Fisher Information in Time-Dependent Many-Body Systems
PINNs combined with Magnus expansion learn scheduling functions and adiabatic gauge potentials that yield higher normalized QFI than Euler-Lagrange baselines in nearest-neighbor, dipolar, and trapped-ion spin models u...
-
Warm-Start Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm for QAM MIMO Data Detection
WSLR-QAOA combines a low-rank semidefinite warm-start with linear-ramp QAOA to achieve symbol error rates close to maximum-likelihood detection for high-order QAM MIMO while running faster than standard QAOA and showi...
-
Continuous-time quantum-walk centrality for protein residue interaction networks
Continuous-time quantum walks on protein residue networks yield a centrality measure that agrees with eigenvector centrality, incorporates quantum interference, recovers functional residues, and runs on IBM quantum hardware.
-
How Embeddings Shape Graph Neural Networks: Classical vs Quantum-Oriented Node Representations
Quantum-oriented embeddings deliver consistent gains on structure-driven graph datasets while classical baselines perform adequately on attribute-limited social graphs, under identical training pipelines across five T...
-
Classical and Quantum Machine Learning for Population-Level Prediction of Heat-Related Physiological Events
Classical machine learning models outperform variational quantum models on population-level prediction of heat-related physiological events, while quantum models still exhibit non-trivial learning on the harmonized datasets.
-
Learning Cut Distributions with Quantum Optimization
QAOA ansatz with finite layers can capture any bitstring distribution and solves the Fair Cut Cover problem with provable and empirical advantages over classical approximations on certain graphs.
-
Quantum computing for effective nuclear lattice model
A VQE quantum-computing method for nuclear lattice models shows ground-state energies for 2H, 3H, and 4He approaching experimental values with increasing lattice size.
-
QShield: Securing Neural Networks Against Adversarial Attacks using Quantum Circuits
Hybrid quantum-classical models using structured entanglement keep high accuracy on MNIST, OrganAMNIST and CIFAR-10 while lowering adversarial attack success rates and raising the computational cost of generating attacks.
-
Quantum Measurement Statistics as Bayesian Uncertainty Estimators for Physics-Constrained Learning
Repeated Born-rule measurements on physics-constrained variational quantum circuits produce calibrated Bayesian-style prediction intervals without explicit Bayesian neural network training.
-
Quantum Error Mitigation Strategies for Variational PDE-Constrained Circuits on Noisy Hardware
Physics-constrained variational quantum circuits maintain 25-47% higher fidelity than unconstrained ones at moderate noise, while zero-noise extrapolation cuts absolute error by 82-96% at low noise levels.
-
Mitigating Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Circuits through PDE-Constrained Loss Functions
PDE-constrained loss functions in variational quantum circuits deliver polynomial gradient variance scaling and constraint-induced landscape narrowing to mitigate barren plateaus.
-
HQF-Net: A Hybrid Quantum-Classical Multi-Scale Fusion Network for Remote Sensing Image Segmentation
HQF-Net reports mIoU gains on three remote-sensing benchmarks by adding quantum circuits to skip connections and a mixture-of-experts bottleneck inside a classical U-Net fused with a DINOv3 backbone.
-
GPU-Accelerated Quantum Simulation: Empirical Backend Selection, Gate Fusion, and Adaptive Precision
A new GPU quantum simulator framework achieves 64x-146x speedups for 20-28 qubit circuits via backend selection, gate fusion, and adaptive precision while integrating with Qiskit and others.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Prepare an initial state (here assumed to be the ground or vacuum state|0〉)
-
[2]
Each gate is either a fixed operation, or it can depend on some of the inputs x or the variables θ
Apply a sequence of unitary gates U (or more gen- erally , quantum operations or channels) to|0〉. Each gate is either a fixed operation, or it can depend on some of the inputs x or the variables θ. This prepares the final stateU(x, θ )|0〉
-
[3]
Measure m mutually commuting scalar observablesˆBi in the final state. Step 2 describes the way inputs x are encoded into the variational circuit, namely by associating them with gate parameters that are not used as trainable variables5. Step 3 describes the way quantum information is transformed back to the classical output of a quantum node as the expect...
-
[4]
If the device provides its own gradient method, this is the default choice. For example, this allows for simulators that support the classical efficient ’adjoint’ method of differentiation [46]
-
[5]
If the device is computing expectation values exactly (shots=None) and supports backpropagation, this is the next choice
-
[6]
Most quantum nodes permit analytic derivatives on hardware via parameter-shift rules [47, 48]. If exe- cuting on hardware devices, or with simulators where shots!=None, a parameter-shift gradient transform is the next best choice
-
[7]
Finally , if the circuit does not permit analytic hard- ware gradients, numerical methods such as the method of finite differences is applied. Analytic derivatives Recent advances in the quantum machine learning liter- ature [8, 10, 11, 49 ] have suggested ways to estimate an- alytic derivatives by computing linear combinations of dif- ferent quantum circu...
-
[8]
Classical transforms : These transforms extract information from quantum functions without execting the underlying device. Examples in- clude qml.draw() (for drawing quantum cir- cuits), qml.specs() (resource information), and qml.matrix() (extract the matrix representation of the circuit unitary)
-
[9]
Quantum transforms: These transforms extract in- formation from quantum nodes by generating one or more quantum circuits, and post-processing the re- sults with classical processing. Thus, in contrast to the ‘classical’ transform, the quantum transform requires additional quantum device evaluations in order to compute the requested quantity . Aside from t...
-
[10]
A variational eigenvalue solver on a pho- tonic quantum processor,
Alberto Peruzzo, Jarrod McClean, Peter Shadbolt, Man-Hong Yung, Xiao-Qi Zhou, Peter J Love, Alán Aspuru-Guzik, and Jeremy L O’Brien, “A variational eigenvalue solver on a pho- tonic quantum processor,” Nature Communications 5, 4213 (2014)
work page 2014
-
[11]
A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm
Edward Farhi, Jeffrey Goldstone, and Sam Gutmann, “A quantum approximate optimization algorithm,” arXiv preprint (2014), arxiv:1411.4028
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
-
[12]
Variational quantum factoring,
Eric R Anschuetz, Jonathan P Olson, Alán Aspuru-Guzik, and Yudong Cao, “Variational quantum factoring,” arXiv preprint (2018), arxiv:1808.08927
- [13]
-
[14]
Quantum autoencoders for efficient compression of quantum data,
Jonathan Romero, Jonathan P Olson, and Alan Aspuru- Guzik, “Quantum autoencoders for efficient compression of quantum data,” Quantum Science and Technology2, 045001 (2017)
work page 2017
-
[15]
Qvector: an al- gorithm for device-tailored quantum error correction
Peter D Johnson, Jonathan Romero, Jonathan Olson, Yudong Cao, and Alán Aspuru-Guzik, “QVECTOR: an algorithm for device-tailored quantum error correction,” arXiv preprint (2017), arxiv:1711.02249
-
[16]
A quantum algorithm to train neural net- works using low-depth circuits,
Guillaume Verdon, Michael Broughton, and Jacob Bi- amonte, “A quantum algorithm to train neural net- works using low-depth circuits,” arXiv preprint (2017), arxiv:1712.05304
-
[17]
Classification with Quantum Neural Networks on Near Term Processors
Edward Farhi and Hartmut Neven, “Classification with quantum neural networks on near term processors,” arXiv preprint (2018), arxiv:1802.06002
work page Pith review arXiv 2018
-
[18]
Maria Schuld and Nathan Killoran, “Quantum machine learning in feature Hilbert spaces,” arXiv preprint (2018), arxiv:1803.07128
-
[19]
Kosuke Mitarai, Makoto Negoro, Masahiro Kitagawa, and Keisuke Fujii, “Quantum circuit learning,” Phys. Rev. A 98, 032309 (2018), arxiv:1803.00745
-
[20]
Circuit-centric quantum classifiers,
Maria Schuld, Alex Bocharov, Krysta Svore, and Nathan Wiebe, “Circuit-centric quantum classifiers,” arXiv preprint (2018), arxiv:1804.00633
-
[21]
Hierarchical quantum classifiers,
Edward Grant, Marcello Benedetti, Shuxiang Cao, Andrew Hallam, Joshua Lockhart, Vid Stojevic, Andrew G Green, and Simone Severini, “Hierarchical quantum classifiers,” arXiv preprint (2018), arxiv:1804.03680
-
[22]
Differentiable learning of quantum circuit born machines,
Jin-Guo Liu and Lei Wang, “Differentiable learning of quantum circuit Born machine,” arXiv preprint (2018), arxiv:1804.04168
-
[23]
Quantum generative adversarial networks,
Pierre-Luc Dallaire-Demers and Nathan Killoran, “Quantum generative adversarial networks,” Physical Review A 98, 012324 (2018)
work page 2018
-
[24]
Supervised learning with quantum- enhanced feature spaces,
Vojtech Havlicek, Antonio D Córcoles, Kristan Temme, Aram W Harrow, Jerry M Chow, and Jay M Gambetta, “Su- pervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spaces,” arXiv preprint (2018), arxiv:1804.11326
-
[25]
Universal discrimi- native quantum neural networks,
Hongxiang Chen, Leonard Wossnig, Simone Severini, Hart- mut Neven, and Masoud Mohseni, “Universal discrimi- native quantum neural networks,” arXiv preprint (2018), arxiv:1805.08654
-
[26]
Continuous-variable quantum neural networks,
Nathan Killoran, Thomas R Bromley , Juan Miguel Arra- zola, Maria Schuld, Nicolás Quesada, and Seth Lloyd, “Continuous-variable quantum neural networks,” arXiv preprint (2018), arxiv:1806.06871
-
[27]
Quantum optical neural networks,
Gregory R Steinbrecher, Jonathan P Olson, Dirk Englund, and Jacques Carolan, “Quantum optical neural networks,” arXiv preprint (2018), arxiv:1808.10047
-
[28]
LIQUi|>: A software de- 17 sign architecture and domain-specific language for quantum computing,
Dave Wecker and Krysta M. Svore, “LIQUi|>: A software de- 17 sign architecture and domain-specific language for quantum computing,” arXiv preprint (2014), arxiv:1402.4467
-
[29]
qHiPSTER: The quantum high performance software testing environment,
Mikhail Smelyanskiy , Nicolas PD Sawaya, and Alán Aspuru-Guzik, “qHiPSTER: the quantum high performance software testing environment,” arXiv preprint (2016), arxiv:1601.07195
-
[30]
IBM Corporation, “Qiskit,” (2016)
work page 2016
-
[31]
Pro- jectQ: an open source software framework for quantum com- puting,
Damian S Steiger, Thomas Häner, and Matthias Troyer, “Pro- jectQ: an open source software framework for quantum com- puting,” Quantum 2, 49 (2018)
work page 2018
- [32]
- [33]
-
[34]
Straw- berry Fields: A software platform for photonic quantum com- puting,
Nathan Killoran, Josh Izaac, Nicolás Quesada, Ville Bergholm, Matthew Amy , and Christian Weedbrook, “Straw- berry Fields: A software platform for photonic quantum com- puting,” arXiv preprint (2018), arxiv:1804.03159
-
[35]
Google Inc., “Cirq,” (2018)
work page 2018
-
[36]
Quantum circuits with many photons on a programmable nanophotonic chip,
J.M. Arrazola, V . Bergholm, K. Brádler, T .R. Bromley , M.J. Collins, I. Dhand, A. Fumagalli, T . Gerrits, A. Goussev, L.G. Helt, J. Hundal, T . Isacsson, R.B. Israel, J. Izaac, S. Jahangiri, R. Janik, N. Killoran, S.P . Kumar, J. Lavoie, A.E. Lita, D.H. Mahler, M. Menotti, B. Morrison, S.W . Nam, L. Neuhaus, H.Y. Qi, N. Quesada, A. Repingon, K.K. Sabapa...
work page 2021
- [37]
- [38]
-
[39]
Quantum machine learning toolbox,
Xanadu Inc., “Quantum machine learning toolbox,” (2018)
work page 2018
-
[40]
A framework for algorithm deploy- ment on cloud-based quantum computers,
Sukin Sim, Yudong Cao, Jonathan Romero, Peter D Johnson, and Alan Aspuru-Guzik, “A framework for algorithm deploy- ment on cloud-based quantum computers,” arXiv preprint (2018), arxiv:1810.10576
-
[41]
Michael Broughton, Guillaume Verdon, Trevor McCourt, An- tonio J Martinez, Jae Hyeon Yoo, Sergei V Isakov, Philip Massey , Ramin Halavati, Murphy Yuezhen Niu, Alexan- der Zlokapa, et al. , “Tensorflow quantum: A software framework for quantum machine learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.02989 (2020)
-
[42]
Yao. jl: Extensible, efficient framework for quantum algorithm de- sign,
Xiu-Zhe Luo, Jin-Guo Liu, Pan Zhang, and Lei Wang, “Yao. jl: Extensible, efficient framework for quantum algorithm de- sign,” Quantum 4, 341 (2020)
work page 2020
-
[43]
Autograd: Effortless gradients in numpy ,
Dougal Maclaurin, David Duvenaud, and Ryan P Adams, “Autograd: Effortless gradients in numpy ,” inICML 2015 Au- toML Workshop (2015)
work page 2015
-
[44]
Tensor- Flow: a system for large-scale machine learning
Martín Abadi, Paul Barham, Jianmin Chen, Zhifeng Chen, Andy Davis, Jeffrey Dean, Matthieu Devin, Sanjay Ghe- mawat, Geoffrey Irving, Michael Isard, Manjunath Kudlur, Josh Levenberg, Rajat Monga, Sherry Moore, Derek G. Mur- ray , Benoit Steiner, Paul Tucker, Vijay Vasudevan, Pete War- den, Martin Wicke, Yuan Yu, and Xiaoqiang Zheng, “Tensor- Flow: a system...
work page 2016
-
[45]
Automatic dif- ferentiation in PyTorch,
Adam Paszke, Sam Gross, Soumith Chintala, Gregory Chanan, Edward Yang, Zachary DeVito, Zeming Lin, Alban Desmaison, Luca Antiga, and Adam Lerer, “Automatic dif- ferentiation in PyTorch,” (2017)
work page 2017
-
[46]
JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs,
James Bradbury , Roy Frostig, Peter Hawkins, Matthew James Johnson, Chris Leary , Dougal Maclaurin, George Necula, Adam Paszke, Jake VanderPlas, Skye Wanderman-Milne, and Qiao Zhang, “JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs,” (2018)
work page 2018
-
[47]
Quantum generative adversarial learning,
Seth Lloyd and Christian Weedbrook, “Quantum generative adversarial learning,” Physical Review Letters 121, 040502 (2018)
work page 2018
-
[48]
Quantum computing with differentiable quantum transforms,
Olivia Di Matteo, Josh Izaac, Tom Bromley , Anthony Hayes, Christina Lee, Maria Schuld, Antal Száva, Chase Roberts, and Nathan Killoran, “Quantum computing with differentiable quantum transforms,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.13414 (2022)
-
[49]
thesis, Harvard University , Graduate School of Arts & Sciences (2016)
Dougal Maclaurin, Modeling, inference and optimization with composable differentiable procedures , Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University , Graduate School of Arts & Sciences (2016)
work page 2016
-
[50]
Automatic differen- tiation in machine learning: a survey
Atılım Güne¸ s Baydin, Barak A Pearlmutter, Alexey Andreye- vich Radul, and Jeffrey Mark Siskind, “Automatic differen- tiation in machine learning: a survey .” Journal of Machine Learning Research 18, 1–153 (2018)
work page 2018
-
[51]
The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms,
Jarrod R McClean, Jonathan Romero, Ryan Babbush, and Alán Aspuru-Guzik, “The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms,” New Journal of Physics 18, 023023 (2016)
work page 2016
-
[52]
The expressive power of parameterized quantum cir- cuits,
Yuxuan Du, Min-Hsiu Hsieh, Tongliang Liu, and Dacheng Tao, “The expressive power of parameterized quantum cir- cuits,” arXiv preprint (2018), arxiv:1810.11922
-
[53]
Towards quantum machine learning with tensor networks,
William Huggins, Piyush Patel, K Birgitta Whaley , and E Miles Stoudenmire, “Towards quantum machine learning with tensor networks,” arXiv preprint (2018), arxiv:1803.11537
- [54]
-
[55]
Tyson Jones and Julien Gacon, “Efficient calculation of gra- dients in classical simulations of variational quantum algo- rithms,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.02823 (2020)
-
[56]
Evaluating analytic gradients on quan- tum hardware,
Maria Schuld, Ville Bergholm, Christian Gogolin, Josh Izaac, and Nathan Killoran, “Evaluating analytic gradients on quan- tum hardware,” Physical Review A 99, 032331 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[57]
General parameter-shift rules for quantum gradients,
David Wierichs, Josh Izaac, Cody Wang, and Cedric Yen-Yu Lin, “General parameter-shift rules for quantum gradients,” Quantum 6, 677 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[58]
Prac- tical optimization for hybrid quantum-classical algorithms,
Gian Giacomo Guerreschi and Mikhail Smelyanskiy , “Prac- tical optimization for hybrid quantum-classical algorithms,” arXiv preprint (2017), arxiv:1701.01450
-
[59]
Measuring analytic gradients of general quantum evolution with the stochastic parameter shift rule,
Leonardo Banchi and Gavin E Crooks, “Measuring analytic gradients of general quantum evolution with the stochastic parameter shift rule,” Quantum 5, 386 (2021)
work page 2021
-
[60]
Qiskit backend speci- fications for OpenQASM and OpenPulse experiments,
David C McKay , Thomas Alexander, Luciano Bello, Michael J Biercuk, Lev Bishop, Jiayin Chen, Jerry M Chow, Antonio D Córcoles, Daniel Egger, Stefan Filipp, et al., “Qiskit backend specifications for openqasm and openpulse experiments,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.03452 (2018)
- [61]
-
[62]
James Stokes, Josh Izaac, Nathan Killoran, and Giuseppe Carleo, “Quantum natural gradient,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.02108 (2019)
-
[63]
Structure optimization for parameterized quan- tum circuits,
Mateusz Ostaszewski, Edward Grant, and Marcello Benedetti, “Structure optimization for parameterized quan- tum circuits,” Quantum 5, 391 (2021)
work page 2021
-
[64]
Andrew Arrasmith, Lukasz Cincio, Rolando D Somma, and Patrick J Coles, “Operator sampling for shot-frugal optimization in variational algorithms,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.06252 (2020)
-
[65]
Optimizing quan- tum circuits with riemannian gradient-flow,
Roeland Wiersema and Nathan Killoran, “Optimizing quan- tum circuits with riemannian gradient-flow,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.06976 (2022)
-
[66]
Differentiable quantum computational chemistry with pennylane,
Juan Miguel Arrazola, Soran Jahangiri, Alain Delgado, Jack Ceroni, Josh Izaac, Antal Száva, Utkarsh Azad, Robert A. 18 Lang, Zeyue Niu, Olivia Di Matteo, Romain Moyard, Jay Soni, Maria Schuld, Rodrigo A. Vargas-Hernández, Teresa Tamayo-Mendoza, Cedric Yen-Yu Lin, Alán Aspuru- Guzik, and Nathan Killoran, “Differentiable quantum computational chemistry with...
-
[67]
Openfermion: The electronic structure package for quantum computers,
Jarrod R McClean, Kevin J Sung, Ian D Kivlichan, Yudong Cao, Chengyu Dai, E Schuyler Fried, Craig Gidney , Bren- dan Gimby , Pranav Gokhale, Thomas Häner, et al., “Open- fermion: the electronic structure package for quantum com- puters,” arXiv:1710.07629 (2017)
-
[68]
Pyscf: the python-based simulations of chemistry framework,
Qiming Sun, Timothy C Berkelbach, Nick S Blunt, George H Booth, Sheng Guo, Zhendong Li, Junzi Liu, James D Mc- Clain, Elvira R Sayfutyarova, Sandeep Sharma,et al., “Pyscf: the python-based simulations of chemistry framework,” Wi- ley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Sci- ence 8, e1340 (2018)
work page 2018
-
[69]
Psi4: an open-source ab initio elec- tronic structure program,
Justin M Turney , Andrew C Simmonett, Robert M Parrish, Ed- ward G Hohenstein, Francesco A Evangelista, Justin T Fer- mann, Benjamin J Mintz, Lori A Burns, Jeremiah J Wilke, Micah L Abrams, et al., “Psi4: an open-source ab initio elec- tronic structure program,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science 2, 556–565 (2012)
work page 2012
-
[70]
Robert M Parrish, Lori A Burns, Daniel GA Smith, Andrew C Simmonett, A Eugene DePrince III, Edward G Hohenstein, Ugur Bozkaya, Alexander Yu Sokolov, Roberto Di Remigio, Ryan M Richard, et al. , “Psi4 1.1: An open-source elec- tronic structure program emphasizing automation, advanced libraries, and interoperability ,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computa...
work page 2017
-
[71]
Nvidia/cuquantum: cuquantum v22.03.0,
NVIDIA cuQuantum team, “Nvidia/cuquantum: cuquantum v22.03.0,” (2022)
work page 2022
-
[72]
PennyLane Strawberry Fields plugin,
Xanadu Inc., “PennyLane Strawberry Fields plugin,” (2018)
work page 2018
-
[73]
Robert S Smith, Michael J Curtis, and William J Zeng, “A practical quantum instruction set architecture,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.03355 (2016)
- [74]
- [75]
- [76]
- [77]
-
[78]
QunaSys, “Qulacs,” (2019)
work page 2019
- [79]
- [80]
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.