pith. sign in

super hub Mixed citations

Humanity's Last Exam

Mixed citation behavior. Most common role is background (42%).

125 Pith papers citing it
8 external citations · Pith
Background 42% of classified citations
abstract

Benchmarks are important tools for tracking the rapid advancements in large language model (LLM) capabilities. However, benchmarks are not keeping pace in difficulty: LLMs now achieve over 90\% accuracy on popular benchmarks like MMLU, limiting informed measurement of state-of-the-art LLM capabilities. In response, we introduce Humanity's Last Exam (HLE), a multi-modal benchmark at the frontier of human knowledge, designed to be the final closed-ended academic benchmark of its kind with broad subject coverage. HLE consists of 2,500 questions across dozens of subjects, including mathematics, humanities, and the natural sciences. HLE is developed globally by subject-matter experts and consists of multiple-choice and short-answer questions suitable for automated grading. Each question has a known solution that is unambiguous and easily verifiable, but cannot be quickly answered via internet retrieval. State-of-the-art LLMs demonstrate low accuracy and calibration on HLE, highlighting a significant gap between current LLM capabilities and the expert human frontier on closed-ended academic questions. To inform research and policymaking upon a clear understanding of model capabilities, we publicly release HLE at https://lastexam.ai.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 13 dataset 12 method 5 other 1

citation-polarity summary

claims ledger

  • abstract Benchmarks are important tools for tracking the rapid advancements in large language model (LLM) capabilities. However, benchmarks are not keeping pace in difficulty: LLMs now achieve over 90\% accuracy on popular benchmarks like MMLU, limiting informed measurement of state-of-the-art LLM capabilities. In response, we introduce Humanity's Last Exam (HLE), a multi-modal benchmark at the frontier of human knowledge, designed to be the final closed-ended academic benchmark of its kind with broad subject coverage. HLE consists of 2,500 questions across dozens of subjects, including mathematics, hu

authors

co-cited works

clear filters

representative citing papers

Can AI Agents Synthesize Scientific Conclusions?

cs.AI · 2026-06-09 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

A new benchmark and clean-room harness show frontier AI agents reach only 0.337 factual F1 when synthesizing conclusions from scientific evidence.

citing papers explorer

Showing 50 of 105 citing papers after filters.