Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 minor 113 cited by

Constraints on Primordial Black Holes

T0 review · 0 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-15 · grok-4.3

Pith's one-line read Updated limits restrict primordial black holes to a small fraction of the universe's mass across 10^{-5} to 10^{50} g.

desk verdict A solid update to the standard PBH constraint compilation that organizes limits across 55 orders of magnitude but adds no new derivations. read the letter →

arxiv 2002.12778 v2 pith:NW5LR773 submitted 2020-02-27 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-phhep-th

classification astro-ph.COgr-qchep-phhep-th
keywords primordialblackholesdarkmatterconstraintsHawkingradiationgravitationallensingbigbangnucleosynthesiswavescosmicmicrowavebackground
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper compiles and refreshes the upper bounds on the fraction of the universe that could have collapsed into primordial black holes over a vast mass range. For black holes below about 10^{15} g, which evaporate via Hawking radiation, the constraints come from their effects on big bang nucleosynthesis, the cosmic microwave background, and gamma-ray backgrounds. For heavier black holes, the limits arise from gravitational lensing, dynamical friction on stars and galaxies, accretion signatures, and gravitational wave production. The work also addresses indirect limits from the amplitude of primordial density fluctuations and shows how the bounds relax when black holes follow an extended mass distribution rather than a single mass. A reader would care because these limits determine whether primordial black holes can explain any part of the dark matter or serve as seeds for cosmic structures.

What carries the argument

Mass-dependent upper limits on the initial PBH collapse fraction beta(m) and the present-day dark matter fraction f_PBH(m), assembled from evaporation products for low masses and gravitational observables for high masses.

What would settle it

A measured gamma-ray or microlensing event rate exceeding the predicted upper bound in any mass bin where the paper quotes a limit below the observed abundance would directly contradict the constraint for that mass.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

We update the constraints on the fraction of the Universe that may have gone into primordial black holes over the mass range 10^{-5}--10^{50} g. Those smaller than ~10^{15} g would have evaporated by now due to Hawking radiation, so their abundance at formation is constrained by the effects of evaporated particles on big bang nucleosynthesis, the cosmic microwave background, the Galactic and extragalactic gamma-ray and cosmic ray backgrounds and the possible generation of stable Planck mass relics. PBHs larger than ~10^{15} g are subject to a variety of constraints associated with gravitational lensing, dynamical effects, influence on large-scale structure, accretion and gravitational waves.

Load-bearing premise

Many of the constraints depend on uncertain details in models of evaporated particle interactions or the precise interpretation of observed radiation backgrounds.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Black holes below 10^{15} g are excluded as the dominant form of dark matter because their evaporation would overproduce background radiation.
  • In the range above 10^{15} g, gravitational lensing and dynamical constraints keep the PBH dark matter fraction below roughly 10 percent in most windows.
  • Even a sub-dominant PBH population can still seed supermassive black holes or contribute to LIGO/Virgo merger rates.
  • An extended mass function broadens the allowed parameter space and permits PBHs to address multiple cosmological roles simultaneously.
  • Second-order gravitational waves and mu-distortions from high-sigma peaks further cap the amplitude of primordial fluctuations that could form PBHs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Improved gravitational wave detectors could directly test the remaining narrow mass windows still compatible with a significant PBH dark matter fraction.
  • Inflationary models that generate large primordial fluctuations must be checked against these PBH bounds to remain viable.
  • Future CMB polarization measurements may tighten the indirect limits from acoustic reheating and thereby shrink the allowed PBH abundance at intermediate masses.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript updates constraints on the fraction of the Universe in primordial black holes (PBHs) for masses between 10^{-5} and 10^{50} g. It covers evaporation-induced limits for low-mass PBHs from BBN, CMB, gamma-rays and cosmic rays, and relic production, as well as gravitational, lensing, dynamical, accretion and gravitational wave constraints for higher masses. Indirect limits from primordial fluctuations and modifications for extended mass functions are also discussed, with emphasis on observational and theoretical uncertainties.

Significance. This compilation is a valuable reference for the field. By aggregating constraints from diverse observations and flagging uncertainties, it provides a clear overview of the allowed PBH parameter space. The discussion of extended mass functions is particularly useful given the relevance to dark matter, LIGO events and structure formation. The work does not introduce new derivations but faithfully summarizes the literature.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the evaporation threshold is stated as ~10^{15} g; adding a parenthetical note on the corresponding lifetime (e.g., 'corresponding to the age of the Universe') would improve immediate readability for non-specialist readers.
  2. [Introduction] The paper would benefit from a short table in the introduction that lists the principal constraint categories and the mass ranges they apply to, to help readers navigate the subsequent sections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, their recognition of its value as a reference compilation, and their recommendation to accept. We appreciate the comments on the utility of the extended mass function discussion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: compilation of independent external constraints

full rationale

The paper aggregates and updates existing constraints on PBH abundance from a wide range of independent observational and theoretical sources (BBN, CMB, gamma-ray backgrounds, lensing, accretion, gravitational waves, etc.) across the stated mass range. It explicitly flags uncertainties in those inputs rather than deriving new results from its own equations or fits. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain; the work functions as a reference summary whose central claims rest on the cited external literature.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

As a review, the claims rest on the validity of cited observational and theoretical results from the literature; no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced in this work itself.

assumptions (1)
  • standard math Standard cosmological model assumptions underlying BBN, CMB physics, and gravitational lensing calculations
    Invoked throughout when translating observational limits into PBH abundance bounds.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Constraints on Primordial Black Holes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NW5LR773

@misc{pith2026200212778,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Constraints on Primordial Black Holes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NW5LR773}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2002.12778}
}
abstract

We update the constraints on the fraction of the Universe that may have gone into primordial black holes (PBHs) over the mass range $10^{-5}\text{--}10^{50}$ g. Those smaller than $\sim 10^{15}$ g would have evaporated by now due to Hawking radiation, so their abundance at formation is constrained by the effects of evaporated particles on big bang nucleosynthesis, the cosmic microwave background (CMB), the Galactic and extragalactic $\gamma$-ray and cosmic ray backgrounds and the possible generation of stable Planck mass relics. PBHs larger than $\sim 10^{15}$ g are subject to a variety of constraints associated with gravitational lensing, dynamical effects, influence on large-scale structure, accretion and gravitational waves. We discuss the constraints on both the initial collapse fraction and the current fraction of the CDM in PBHs at each mass scale but stress that many of the constraints are associated with observational or theoretical uncertainties. We also consider indirect constraints associated with the amplitude of the primordial density fluctuations, such as second-order tensor perturbations and $\mu$-distortions arising from the effect of acoustic reheating on the CMB, if PBHs are created from the high-$\sigma$ peaks of nearly Gaussian fluctuations. Finally we discuss how the constraints are modified if the PBHs have an extended mass function, this being relevant if PBHs provide some combination of the dark matter, the LIGO/Virgo coalescences and the seeds for cosmic structure. Even if PBHs make a small contribution to the dark matter, they could play an important cosmological role and provide a unique probe of the early Universe.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Showing 60 of 113 Pith papers that cite this

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. See all 113 Pith citations

  1. Cherenkov emission by a fast-moving uncharged Schwarzschild black hole

    hep-th 2025-02 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    An uncharged Schwarzschild black hole moving superluminally through a dielectric in a magnetic field is predicted to emit classical Cherenkov radiation via gravity-distorted field lines.

  2. The statistics of curvature-profile dispersion in primordial black hole formation

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Shape dispersion around the average peak profile is a genuine statistical ingredient: rare deformed curvature profiles can dominate primordial black hole formation when the power spectrum is broad or non-Gaussianity i...

  3. Primordial Black Holes from Vector-Induced Curvature Perturbations Sourced by Primordial Magnetic Fields

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Vector modes from primordial magnetic fields remain constant in a kination epoch and source second-order curvature perturbations scaling as P_R(k) ∝ k^{-5}, sufficient for PBH dark matter abundance in a Ratra-type mag...

  4. Are Primordial Black Holes a Natural Dark Matter Candidate?

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    PBH dark matter spans all naturalness tiers, with some mechanisms as natural as WIMPs or freeze-in particles, determined by abundance map structure rather than candidate type.

  5. Hidden-sector accretion and warped black-string seeds for high-redshift supermassive black holes

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    A warped 5D geometry with hidden-sector accretion produces growing Schwarzschild/Vaidya black-hole seeds on our brane via a common horizon intersection.

  6. Accretion of Primordial Black Holes in Stellar Interiors

    astro-ph.HE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Self-consistent spherical accretion simulations show cooling-enhanced growth of PBHs with radiative efficiency ~10^{-2} in the bremsstrahlung regime, yielding a critical seed mass of ~10^{-16} M_sun to consume a solar...

  7. Carr criterion and mass gaps in non-singular primordial black hole formation

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Non-singular gravity with regulator ℓ induces a PBH mass gap ~c²ℓ/G and a stronger Carr criterion δ_H > 2GM_gap/R_H - 1 when R_H ~ ℓ.

  8. Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Reheating: The Scalar-Induced Component

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Accounting for the minimal mass spread of primordial black holes from gravitational collapse suppresses the Poltergeist GW background to the level of generic scalar-induced signals and reopens ultra-light PBH parameter space.

  9. Reviving primordial black hole formation in slow first-order phase transitions

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Slow reheating after a supercooled first-order phase transition allows an early matter-dominated era in which small curvature perturbations grow sufficiently to form primordial black holes.

  10. Shadows of Giants: Constraints on Stupendously Large Black Holes from Negative Sources against the Cosmic Microwave Background

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Stupendously large black holes cast shadows on the CMB that rule out masses above 10^17 solar masses within the last scattering surface and limit their density parameter to below 10^-5 for masses 10^15 to 10^18 solar masses.

  11. Primordial black holes as cosmic accelerators of light dark matter: Novel direct detection constraints

    hep-ph 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Primordial black hole evaporation generates light fermionic dark matter capable of producing electron recoils in XENONnT, LZ, and PandaX-4T, enabling new constraints on DM-electron interactions after including Earth a...

  12. Beyond FINDCHIRP: Breaking the memory wall and optimal FFTs for Gravitational-Wave Matched-Filter Searches with Ratio-Filter Dechirping

    astro-ph.IM 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Ratio-Filter Dechirping converts gravitational-wave matched filtering from a memory-bound FFT into a cache-efficient FIR convolution, delivering a measured 8x speedup in the core loop.

  13. Cosmological long-wavelength solutions in non-adiabatic multi-fluid systems

    gr-qc 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Nonlinear long-wavelength solutions are constructed for cosmological perturbations in non-adiabatic multi-fluid systems, admitting adiabatic and entropy modes at leading order via ADM and gradient expansion.

  14. Strongly Interacting Dark Matter admixed Neutron Stars

    hep-ph 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Strongly interacting dark matter described by a first-principles G2 gauge-theory equation of state can be mixed into neutron stars while remaining compatible with current observational constraints.

  15. Probability of gravitational-wave lensing by intermediate-mass black holes and globular clusters

    astro-ph.CO 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The rate of compound gravitational-wave lensing by intermediate-mass black holes in globular clusters is at most about 10^-3 of galaxy-scale lensed events, disfavoring GW231123 as such an event.

  16. Boosting the optical depth to Thomson scattering with primordial black hole evaporation at high redshift

    astro-ph.CO 2026-08 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A monochromatic primordial black hole population can raise the CMB optical depth by at most Delta tau ~ 0.008 under current CMB data, leaving BAO-CMB tensions essentially unchanged.

  17. Spectator Axions in String Inflation and Primordial Black Holes

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In Fibre Inflation, spectator axions with f≲0.1 M_Pl leave the PBH power spectrum unchanged, while for f≳0.1 M_Pl and exponentially small non-perturbative prefactors they can raise P_R from 1.9e-4 to 3.5e-3 and enable...

  18. Assessing the Impact of Instrumental Requirements on the Scientific Performance of the Einstein Telescope

    astro-ph.IM 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Degrading the Einstein Telescope's sensitivity in specific frequency bands hurts different science goals in predictable ways, but the mission remains scientifically strong even in the worst modelled cases.

  19. Primordial black holes forming during kination: the trapped, the overdense, and the void

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In one non-attractor inflation model, initially similar field fluctuations produce three distinct black-hole formation channels—trapped, overdense, void—with collapse thresholds determined by the full density profile,...

  20. High-Energy Neutrinos from Black Hole Evaporation in Neutron Stars

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Repeated collapse of asymmetric dark matter inside neutron stars into evaporating microscopic black holes can produce a Galactic-Center-concentrated high-energy neutrino flux at the 10^-12 GeV cm^-2 s^-1 level, subdom...

  21. Primordial Black Hole mass growth from neutrinos during the radiation era

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PBHs of ~1e3–1e7 solar masses can significantly grow by absorbing neutrinos before matter-radiation equality.

  22. Primordial black hole in Lorentz-violating theories: Insights from Bumblebee gravity

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Bumblebee gravity enhances primordial black hole abundance through three mechanisms, but the model harbors a ghost instability and a tachyonic instability that make it cosmologically unviable.

  23. Effect of post-recombination accretion on primordial binary black hole mergers within virialized dark matter halos

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    BHL-type post-recombination accretion can raise late three-body PBH merger rates enough for TianQin detections at f~10^{-6} and for LVK limits to bound delayed virialization.

  24. PBHs and GWs from Scaling Monopoles

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Scaling monopoles generate PBHs via stochastic overdensities and GWs with correlated spectra, potentially with magnetically charged PBHs as a signature if the scaling ends via gauge boson mass.

  25. One Feature, Three Clocks: Phase-Locked Gravitational Waves, Primordial Black Holes, and Non-Gaussianity from Periodic Warm Inflation

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Periodic warm inflation imprints one log-periodic feature on the curvature spectrum that saturates asteroid-mass PBHs, generates dual-band GW backgrounds, and offsets the bispectrum phase by a quarter cycle fixed by s...

  26. Memoirs of the curvaton: non-perturbative non-Gaussianity and supermassive primordial black holes

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Curvaton self-interactions in non-quadratic potentials produce a local non-Gaussian map that enables supermassive primordial black hole formation at peak amplitudes of order 10^{-5} while remaining consistent with μ-d...

  27. String Axiverse Enhancement of Superradiant Dark Matter Production

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    O(100-10^5) string axions enhance PBH superradiance efficiency via increased spin, expanding viable mass-spin regions for micro-boson star dark matter while too many axions cause overly rapid evaporation.

  28. Projecting the ultimate pulsar timing sensitivity to dark matter substructure in a stochastic gravitational wave background

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Monte Carlo and ML surrogate framework projects PTA sensitivity to compact DM substructures and shows SGWB weakens it, with only Shapiro searches retaining sensitivity in optimistic cases.

  29. Primordial Black Hole from Tensor-induced Density Fluctuation: First-order Phase Transitions and Domain Walls

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Tensor perturbations from FOPT and domain-wall sources are claimed to induce second-order scalar perturbations large enough to form primordial black holes, potentially all of the dark matter.

  30. Primordial black holes and the velocity acoustic oscillations features in 21 cm signals from the cosmic Dark Ages

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Primordial black holes generate up to 30% amplitude VAO wiggles in 21 cm signals from the Dark Ages at redshifts 20-40 even at dark matter fractions as low as 10^-13.

  31. STOchastic LAttice Simulation of hybrid inflation

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In hybrid inflation, stochastic noise breaks topological defects into sub-Hubble-scale structures, and only the n=1 case leaves a global imprint on the curvature perturbation.

  32. Numerical simulations of primordial black hole formation via delayed first-order phase transitions

    gr-qc 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Spherically symmetric numerical relativity shows false-vacuum domains from delayed first-order phase transitions form type B (baby-universe) or type A (direct-collapse) primordial black holes, separated by a robust t_...

  33. Revisiting PBH accretion, evaporation and their cosmological consequences

    astro-ph.HE 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Relativistic accretion onto Kerr primordial black holes gives roughly 4.5x mass growth and fast spin-down, strengthening BBN bounds, lowering the survival mass to ~2.7e14 g, and erasing the high-frequency stochastic g...

  34. In-depth analysis of the clustering of dark matter particles around primordial black holes. Part II. Analytical prescriptions for spikes

    astro-ph.HE 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 'soft' analytical approximation reproduces PBH minispike densities and annihilation rates to ~±15%, and shows that a discovered sub-solar PBH population would strongly constrain s-wave WIMP dark matter.

  35. Constraining memory-burdened primordial black holes with graviton-photon conversion and binary mergers

    hep-ph 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Derives gamma-ray upper limits on memory-burdened PBH dark matter abundance using graviton-photon conversion during recombination and merger-induced semiclassical evaporation, excluding mass windows 7.5e5-4.4e7 g and ...

  36. Atomic Quantum Sensors for High-Frequency Gravitational Wave Searches

    hep-ph 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A cavity-plus-atomic-sensor design could reach strain sensitivities down to ~1e-37 Hz^-1/2 in aggressive optical configurations, opening the unexplored high-frequency gravitational-wave band.

  37. GW231123: A Possible Primordial Black Hole Origin

    astro-ph.CO 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GW231123's masses and high spins are consistent with primordial black holes that accreted mass and angular momentum in the early universe within the standard PBH framework.

  38. Primordial black hole induced gravitational waves in $f(R)$ gravity

    astro-ph.CO 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    In R^(1+ε) gravity, exponential growth of scalar perturbations during a PBH-driven early matter era enhances the induced gravitational wave signal, with Ω_GW ∝ f on large scales.

  39. Gravitational wave signatures of primordial black hole accretion during early matter domination

    hep-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PBHs that form in a radiation era and accrete during an early matter era could produce a two-peak GW background detectable by LISA or BBO for asteroid-mass PBHs as all of dark matter.

  40. Primordial black holes from Q-balls produced in a first-order phase transition

    hep-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Bosons trapped in false-vacuum remnants of a dark first-order phase transition can form Q-balls that collapse into primordial black holes, producing correlated gravitational-wave and gamma-ray signals.

  41. Isotropy, anisotropies and non-Gaussianity in the scalar-induced gravitational-wave background: diagrammatic approach for primordial non-Gaussianity up to arbitrary order

    astro-ph.CO 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Extends diagrammatic approach for scalar-induced gravitational waves to arbitrary-order local PNG, deriving semi-analytic spectra for energy density, anisotropies, bispectrum and trispectrum up to quartic terms.

  42. Page Time of Primordial Black Holes in the Standard Model and Beyond

    astro-ph.CO 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For Standard Model emission, a Schwarzschild primordial black hole of about 6.23 x 10^14 grams would reach its Page time at the current age of the Universe.

  43. $\tt GrayHawk$: A public code for calculating the Gray Body Factors of massless fields around spherically symmetric Black Holes

    gr-qc 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new public Mathematica tool, GrayHawk, computes gray-body factors for massless spin 0, 1/2, 1, and 2 fields around seven spherically symmetric, asymptotically flat black hole metrics.

  44. Complementary Probes of Warped Extra Dimension: Colliders, Gravitational Waves and Primordial Black Holes from Phase Transitions

    hep-ph 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In Randall-Sundrum warped extra dimension models, the supercooled radion phase transition can form primordial black holes that account for all of dark matter for IR scales 10 TeV to 10^4 TeV, with correlated gravitati...

  45. Primordial Black Hole Formation via Inverted Bubble Collapse

    astro-ph.CO 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Isolated bubbles from an incomplete phase transition, inverted into false-vacuum regions by a later bulk transition, collapse into nearly monochromatic primordial black holes up to about 10^-5 solar masses.

  46. The Irrelevance of Primordial Black Hole Clustering in the LVK mass range

    astro-ph.CO 2025-02 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Initial spatial clustering of primordial black holes is irrelevant for binary mergers in the LVK mass range because FIRAS spectral-distortion constraints limit the clustering scale to below the merger-relevant separat...

  47. Axion misalignment with memory-burdened PBH

    hep-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Axion dark matter parameter space shifts dramatically when kinetic misalignment and memory-burdened primordial black hole evaporation are combined.

  48. Soliton foam formation in the early Universe

    hep-th 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Post-inflationary quantum fluctuations of two scalar fields can form a three-dimensional soliton foam of closed domain walls, string-bounded walls, and scalar radiation, without a thermal phase transition.

  49. Scalar-induced gravitational waves from a box-shaped curvature power spectrum

    gr-qc 2026-07 accept novelty 5.5 of 10

    Analytic SIGW spectra for a log-box curvature power spectrum: narrow-box geometric overlap factor turning IR slope k^{3}ln^{2}k into k^{2}ln^{2}k, plus broad-box product of universal edge functions.

  50. Enlightening dark moments of neutrino with superradiance

    hep-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Quenched superradiance of dark photon clouds around spinning primordial black holes could turn neutrino electromagnetic moment bounds into observable neutrino fluxes and limits on PBH abundance.

  51. Constraints on Primordial Black Hole Dressed by Dark Matter Halo from Microlensing Effect of Fast Radio Bursts

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new conversion formula turns monochromatic bare-PBH microlensing bounds into extended-mass dressed-PBH bounds, and a 10^5-FRB forecast places f_PBH near 10^-4.

  52. Constraining primordial non-Gaussianity and parity-violation through Scalar-Induced Gravitational Waves with next-generation ground-based interferometers

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ET+CE forecast: injected SIGW parameters (A_p, f_peak, f_NL, tau_NL, parity-odd tau_tilde_NL) are recovered within 1-2 sigma despite an astrophysical foreground, but the chiral V-mode is sub-threshold (SNR 0.5-1.9).

  53. PBH formation and Gravitational Waves as Multi-messenger Signals of First-order Phase Transitions

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    False-vacuum collapse during first-order phase transitions can form PBHs and emit GWs across a broad parameter range, and MeV-scale classically conformal U(1)_{B-L} symmetry breaking has the largest region where both ...

  54. Cancellation of one-loop time dependence in superhorizon curvature perturbations from all scales

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    One-loop time dependence in superhorizon curvature perturbations cancels when all-scale contributions and boundary terms are included consistently via the δN formalism.

  55. A Solar-System Window for Hidden Stellar Companions

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper builds an illustrative mass-distance window for hidden-brane companions and finds overlap with the minimum mass of a QCD-scaled hidden star at the upper end of the allowed range.

  56. Graviton Floor

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Photon-to-graviton conversion in blazar jets dominates a new graviton background that sets a floor for high-frequency GW detectors, analogous to the neutrino floor.

  57. Exciting the Vacuum: Non-Thermal Particle Bursts and Multi-Messenger Signals from Binary Black Holes

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    In the weak-field inspiral regime, binary black holes produce particles via a non-thermal power-law spectrum with dE/dt ∝ M^{10/3} ω^{16/3}.

  58. Universal Suppression of Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Evaporation Dynamics

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Black hole populations with finite-width mass distributions exhibit universal late-time evaporation-driven evolution that produces characteristic power-law suppression of induced gravitational waves, directly linking ...

  59. Primordial Black Holes from Slow Phase Transitions with Delayed Reheating: A Peak-Theory Approach

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    PBH production from slow phase transitions with delayed reheating is modeled via peak theory and Monte Carlo simulations, showing extreme sensitivity to reheating efficiency and potential to explain all dark matter.

  60. A New Origin of the Big Bang from Dark-Sector-Induced Vacuum Decay and Its Gravitational-Wave Signal

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    A model in which inflaton energy goes exclusively to a dark sector, delaying SM thermalization until a false-vacuum decay produces a GW background with present-day Omega_GW up to 3e-8.

See all 113 Pith citations

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 300 canonical work pages · cited by 113 Pith papers (see all)

  1. [1]

    This applies generically if the PBHs form from density fluctuations with a δ-function power spectrum

    A critical collapse mass function of the form ψ(M)∝ M2.85 exp(−(M/Mf)2.85) , (107) where the exponent 2.85 assumes radiation-domination [33, 44, 148, 551]. This applies generically if the PBHs form from density fluctuations with a δ-function power spectrum. In this case, the mass spectrum extends down to arbitrarily low masses but there is an exponential u...

  2. [2]

    stupendously large black holes

    Special consideration is required in the w = 0 (matter-dominated) case [552], because both cut-offs in (106) can then be relevant. For example, this may arise due to some form of phase transition in which the mass is channeled into non-relativistic particles [76, 77] or due to slow reheating after inflation [80]. Since Eq. (106) predicts γ = 0 in this case,...

  3. [3]

    Y. B. Zel’dovich and I. D. Novikov, Sov. Astron. 10, 602 (1967)

  4. [4]

    S. W. Hawking, Nature 248, 30 (1974)

  5. [5]

    P. A. R. Ade et al. (Planck), Astron. Astrophys. 594, A13 (2016), arXiv:1502.01589 [astro-ph.CO]

  6. [6]

    G. F. Chapline, Nature 253, 251 (1975)

  7. [7]

    R. H. Cyburt, B. D. Fields, and K. A. Olive, Phys. Lett. B 567, 227 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0302431

  8. [8]

    D. N. Page and S. W. Hawking, Astrophys. J. 206, 1 (1976)

Show all 300 references
  1. [9]

    Lehoucq, M

    R. Lehoucq, M. Cass´ e, J.-M. Casandjian, and I. Grenier, Astron. Astrophys. 502, 37 (2009), arXiv:0906.1648 [astro- ph.HE]

  2. [10]

    Barrau, Astropart

    A. Barrau, Astropart. Phys. 12, 269 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9907347

  3. [11]

    P. N. Okele and M. J. Rees, Astron. Astrophys. 81, 263 (1980)

  4. [12]

    K. M. Belotsky and A. A. Kirillov, JCAP 01, 041 (2015), arXiv:1409.8601 [astro-ph.CO]

  5. [13]

    D. B. Cline, D. A. Sanders, and W. Hong, Astrophys. J. 486, 169 (1997)

  6. [14]

    M. R. S. Hawkins, Nature 366, 242 (1993)

  7. [15]

    C. G. Lacey and J. P. Ostriker, Astrophys. J. 299, 633 (1985)

  8. [16]

    Yokoyama, Astron

    J. Yokoyama, Astron. Astrophys. 318, 673 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9509027. 58

  9. [17]

    Bean and J

    R. Bean and J. Magueijo, Phys. Rev. D 66, 063505 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0204486

  10. [18]

    Afshordi, P

    N. Afshordi, P. McDonald, and D. N. Spergel, Astrophys. J. Lett. 594, L71 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0302035

  11. [19]

    Ricotti, J

    M. Ricotti, J. P. Ostriker, and K. J. Mack, Astrophys. J. 680, 829 (2008), arXiv:0709.0524 [astro-ph]

  12. [20]

    S. Bird, I. Cholis, J. B. Mu˜ noz, Y. Ali-Ha¨ ımoud, M. Kamionkowski, E. D. Kovetz, A. Raccanelli, and A. G. Riess, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 201301 (2016), arXiv:1603.00464 [astro-ph.CO]

  13. [21]

    Barrau, D

    A. Barrau, D. Blais, G. Boudoul, and D. Polarski, Annalen Phys. 13, 115 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0303330

  14. [22]

    B. Carr, F. K¨ uhnel, and M. Sandstad, Phys. Rev. D 94, 083504 (2016), arXiv:1607.06077 [astro-ph.CO]

  15. [23]

    B. Carr, S. Clesse, J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, and F. K¨ uhnel, Phys. Dark Univ.31, 100755 (2021), arXiv:1906.08217 [astro-ph.CO]

  16. [24]

    Carr and F

    B. Carr and F. K¨ uhnel, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Sci.70, 355 (2020), arXiv:2006.02838 [astro-ph.CO]

  17. [25]

    Hawking, Mon

    S. Hawking, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 152, 75 (1971)

  18. [26]

    B. J. Carr and S. W. Hawking, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 168, 399 (1974)

  19. [27]

    B. J. Carr, Astrophys. J. 201, 1 (1975)

  20. [28]

    D. K. Nadezhin, I. D. Novikov, and A. G. Polnarev, Sov. Astron. 22, 129 (1978)

  21. [29]

    G. V. Bicknell and R. N. Henriksen, Astrophys. J. 232, 670 (1979)

  22. [30]

    Shibata and M

    M. Shibata and M. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. D 60, 084002 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9905064

  23. [31]

    A. M. Green, A. R. Liddle, K. A. Malik, and M. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. D 70, 041502(R) (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0403181

  24. [32]

    Harada, C.-M

    T. Harada, C.-M. Yoo, and K. Kohri, Phys. Rev. D 88, 084051 (2013), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. D 89, 029903 (2014)], arXiv:1309.4201 [astro-ph.CO]

  25. [33]

    Harada, C.-M

    T. Harada, C.-M. Yoo, T. Nakama, and Y. Koga, Phys. Rev. D 91, 084057 (2015), arXiv:1503.03934 [gr-qc]

  26. [34]

    J. C. Niemeyer and K. Jedamzik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5481 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9709072

  27. [35]

    J. C. Niemeyer and K. Jedamzik, Phys. Rev. D 59, 124013 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9901292

  28. [36]

    Musco, J

    I. Musco, J. C. Miller, and L. Rezzolla, Class. Quant. Grav. 22, 1405 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0412063

  29. [37]

    Musco, J

    I. Musco, J. C. Miller, and A. G. Polnarev, Class. Quant. Grav. 26, 235001 (2009), arXiv:0811.1452 [gr-qc]

  30. [38]

    A. G. Polnarev and I. Musco, Class. Quant. Grav. 24, 1405 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0605122

  31. [39]

    Nakama, T

    T. Nakama, T. Harada, A. G. Polnarev, and J. Yokoyama, JCAP 01, 037 (2014), arXiv:1310.3007 [gr-qc]

  32. [40]

    Musco, Phys

    I. Musco, Phys. Rev. D 100, 123524 (2019), arXiv:1809.02127 [gr-qc]

  33. [41]

    Escriv` a, C

    A. Escriv` a, C. Germani, and R. K. Sheth, Phys. Rev. D 101, 044022 (2020), arXiv:1907.13311 [gr-qc]

  34. [42]

    Germani and I

    C. Germani and I. Musco, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 141302 (2019), arXiv:1805.04087 [astro-ph.CO]

  35. [43]

    Musco, V

    I. Musco, V. De Luca, G. Franciolini, and A. Riotto, Phys. Rev. D 103, 063538 (2021), arXiv:2011.03014 [astro-ph.CO]

  36. [44]

    Saito, J

    R. Saito, J. Yokoyama, and R. Nagata, JCAP 06, 024 (2008), arXiv:0804.3470 [astro-ph]

  37. [45]

    Kehagias, I

    A. Kehagias, I. Musco, and A. Riotto, JCAP 12, 029 (2019), arXiv:1906.07135 [astro-ph.CO]

  38. [46]

    Yokoyama, Phys

    J. Yokoyama, Phys. Rev. D 58, 107502 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9804041

  39. [47]

    A. M. Green and A. R. Liddle, Phys. Rev. D 60, 063509 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9901268

  40. [48]

    G. D. Kribs, A. K. Leibovich, and I. Z. Rothstein, Phys. Rev. D 60, 103510 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9904021

  41. [49]

    Harada, C.-M

    T. Harada, C.-M. Yoo, K. Kohri, Y. Koga, and T. Monobe, Astrophys. J. 908, 140 (2021), arXiv:2011.00710 [astro- ph.CO]

  42. [50]

    Jedamzik, Phys

    K. Jedamzik, Phys. Rev. D 55, R5871 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9605152

  43. [51]

    Widerin and C

    P. Widerin and C. Schmid, arXiv:astro-ph/9808142

  44. [52]

    Jedamzik and J

    K. Jedamzik and J. C. Niemeyer, Phys. Rev. D 59, 124014 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9901293

  45. [53]

    C. T. Byrnes, M. Hindmarsh, S. Young, and M. R. S. Hawkins, JCAP 08, 041 (2018), arXiv:1801.06138 [astro-ph.CO]

  46. [54]

    B. J. Carr and J. E. Lidsey, Phys. Rev. D 48, 543 (1993)

  47. [55]

    Ivanov, P

    P. Ivanov, P. Naselsky, and I. Novikov, Phys. Rev. D 50, 7173 (1994)

  48. [56]

    Yokoyama, Phys

    J. Yokoyama, Phys. Rev. D 58, 083510 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9802357

  49. [57]

    Garc´ ıa-Bellido and E

    J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido and E. Ruiz Morales, Phys. Dark Univ.18, 47 (2017), arXiv:1702.03901 [astro-ph.CO]

  50. [58]

    Ballesteros and M

    G. Ballesteros and M. Taoso, Phys. Rev. D 97, 023501 (2018), arXiv:1709.05565 [hep-ph]

  51. [59]

    M. P. Hertzberg and M. Yamada, Phys. Rev. D 97, 083509 (2018), arXiv:1712.09750 [astro-ph.CO]

  52. [60]

    W. H. Kinney, Phys. Rev. D 72, 023515 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0503017

  53. [61]

    Germani and T

    C. Germani and T. Prokopec, Phys. Dark Univ. 18, 6 (2017), arXiv:1706.04226 [astro-ph.CO]

  54. [62]

    Pattison, V

    C. Pattison, V. Vennin, H. Assadullahi, and D. Wands, JCAP 10, 046 (2017), arXiv:1707.00537 [hep-th]

  55. [63]

    J. M. Ezquiaga and J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, JCAP08, 018 (2018), arXiv:1805.06731 [astro-ph.CO]

  56. [64]

    Biagetti, G

    M. Biagetti, G. Franciolini, A. Kehagias, and A. Riotto, JCAP 07, 032 (2018), arXiv:1804.07124 [astro-ph.CO]

  57. [65]

    E. D. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 56, 2019 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9703232 [hep-ph]

  58. [66]

    Kohri, D

    K. Kohri, D. H. Lyth, and A. Melchiorri, JCAP 04, 038 (2008), arXiv:0711.5006 [hep-ph]

  59. [67]

    Alabidi and K

    L. Alabidi and K. Kohri, Phys. Rev. D 80, 063511 (2009), arXiv:0906.1398 [astro-ph.CO]

  60. [68]

    A. M. Green and K. A. Malik, Phys. Rev. D 64, 021301(R) (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0008113

  61. [69]

    B. A. Bassett and S. Tsujikawa, Phys. Rev. D 63, 123503 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0008328

  62. [70]

    Martin, T

    J. Martin, T. Papanikolaou, and V. Vennin, JCAP 01, 024 (2020), arXiv:1907.04236 [astro-ph.CO]

  63. [71]

    Randall, M

    L. Randall, M. Soljacic, and A. H. Guth, Nucl. Phys. B472, 377 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9512439

  64. [72]

    Garc´ ıa-Bellido, A

    J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, A. D. Linde, and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D 54, 6040 (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9605094

  65. [73]

    Kawasaki, N

    M. Kawasaki, N. Sugiyama, and T. Yanagida, Phys. Rev. D 57, 6050 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9710259

  66. [74]

    Clesse and J

    S. Clesse and J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, Phys. Rev. D92, 023524 (2015), arXiv:1501.07565 [astro-ph.CO]

  67. [75]

    D. H. Lyth and D. Wands, Phys. Lett. B 524, 5 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0110002 [hep-ph]

  68. [76]

    Kawasaki, N

    M. Kawasaki, N. Kitajima, and T. T. Yanagida, Phys. Rev. D 87, 063519 (2013), arXiv:1207.2550 [hep-ph]

  69. [77]

    Kohri, C.-M

    K. Kohri, C.-M. Lin, and T. Matsuda, Phys. Rev. D 87, 103527 (2013), arXiv:1211.2371 [hep-ph]. 59

  70. [78]

    M. Y. Khlopov and A. G. Polnarev, Phys. Lett. B 97, 383 (1980)

  71. [79]

    A. G. Polnarev and M. Y. Khlopov, Sov. Astron. 25, 406 (1981)

  72. [80]

    A. G. Polnarev and M. Y. Khlopov, Sov. Astron. 26, 391 (1982)

  73. [81]

    M. Y. Khlopov, B. A. Malomed, and Y. B. Zeldovich, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 215, 575 (1985)

  74. [82]

    B. J. Carr, J. H. Gilbert, and J. E. Lidsey, Phys. Rev. D 50, 4853 (1994), arXiv:astro-ph/9405027

  75. [83]

    B. Carr, K. Dimopoulos, C. Owen, and T. Tenkanen, Phys. Rev. D 97, 123535 (2018), arXiv:1804.08639 [astro-ph.CO]

  76. [84]

    Martin, T

    J. Martin, T. Papanikolaou, L. Pinol, and V. Vennin, JCAP 05, 003 (2020), arXiv:2002.01820 [astro-ph.CO]

  77. [85]

    Allahverdi et al., Open J

    R. Allahverdi et al., Open J. Astrophys. 4 (2020), 10.21105/astro.2006.16182, arXiv:2006.16182 [astro-ph.CO]

  78. [86]

    Kokubu, K

    T. Kokubu, K. Kyutoku, K. Kohri, and T. Harada, Phys. Rev. D 98, 123024 (2018), arXiv:1810.03490 [astro-ph.CO]

  79. [87]

    Harada, C.-M

    T. Harada, C.-M. Yoo, K. Kohri, K.-i. Nakao, and S. Jhingan, Astrophys. J. 833, 61 (2016), arXiv:1609.01588 [astro- ph.CO]

  80. [88]

    Harada, C.-M

    T. Harada, C.-M. Yoo, K. Kohri, and K.-I. Nakao, Phys. Rev. D 96, 083517 (2017), arXiv:1707.03595 [gr-qc]

  81. [89]

    Ade et al

    P. Ade et al. (Planck), Astron. Astrophys. 571, A25 (2014), arXiv:1303.5085 [astro-ph.CO]

  82. [90]

    J. J. Blanco-Pillado, K. D. Olum, and X. Siemens, Phys. Lett. B 778, 392 (2018), arXiv:1709.02434 [astro-ph.CO]

  83. [91]

    S. W. Hawking, Phys. Lett. B 231, 237 (1989)

  84. [92]

    Polnarev and R

    A. Polnarev and R. Zembowicz, Phys. Rev. D 43, 1106 (1991)

  85. [93]

    R. N. Hansen, M. Christensen, and A. L. Larsen, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A15, 4433 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/9902048

  86. [94]

    C. J. Hogan, Phys. Lett. B 143, 87 (1984)

  87. [95]

    Nagasawa, Gen

    M. Nagasawa, Gen. Rel. Grav. 37, 1635 (2005)

  88. [96]

    Formation of black holes from cosmic strings,

    H. Honma and H. Minakata, “Formation of black holes from cosmic strings,” (1991)

  89. [97]

    James-Turner, D

    C. James-Turner, D. P. Weil, A. M. Green, and E. J. Copeland, Phys. Rev. D 101, 123526 (2020), arXiv:1911.12658 [astro-ph.CO]

  90. [98]

    R. R. Caldwell and B. Allen, Phys. Rev. D 45, 3447 (1992)

  91. [99]

    J. H. MacGibbon, R. H. Brandenberger, and U. F. Wichoski, Phys. Rev. D 57, 2158 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9707146

  92. [100]

    A. C. Jenkins and M. Sakellariadou, arXiv:2006.16249 [astro-ph.CO]

  93. [101]

    Helfer, J

    T. Helfer, J. C. Aurrekoetxea, and E. A. Lim, Phys. Rev. D 99, 104028 (2019), arXiv:1808.06678 [gr-qc]

  94. [102]

    Matsuda, JHEP 04, 017 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0509062

    T. Matsuda, JHEP 04, 017 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0509062

  95. [103]

    M. Lake, S. Thomas, and J. Ward, JHEP 12, 033 (2009), arXiv:0906.3695 [hep-ph]

  96. [104]

    Crawford and D

    M. Crawford and D. N. Schramm, Nature 298, 538 (1982)

  97. [105]

    S. W. Hawking, I. G. Moss, and J. M. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 26, 2681 (1982)

  98. [106]

    La and P

    D. La and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Lett. B 220, 375 (1989)

  99. [107]

    I. G. Moss, Phys. Rev. D 50, 676 (1994)

  100. [108]

    R. V. Konoplich, S. G. Rubin, A. S. Sakharov, and M. Y. Khlopov, Astronomy Letters 24, 413 (1998)

  101. [109]

    R. V. Konoplich, S. G. Rubin, A. S. Sakharov, and M. Y. Khlopov, Phys. Atom. Nucl. 62, 1593 (1999)

  102. [110]

    Sato, Mon

    K. Sato, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 195, 467 (1981)

  103. [111]

    A. H. Guth, Phys. Rev. D 23, 347 (1981)

  104. [112]

    Kodama, M

    H. Kodama, M. Sasaki, and K. Sato, Prog. Theor. Phys. 68, 1979 (1982)

  105. [113]

    Kusenko, M

    A. Kusenko, M. Sasaki, S. Sugiyama, M. Takada, V. Takhistov, and E. Vitagliano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 18 (2020), arXiv:2001.09160 [astro-ph.CO]

  106. [114]

    Cotner and A

    E. Cotner and A. Kusenko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 031103 (2017), arXiv:1612.02529 [astro-ph.CO]

  107. [115]

    Cotner and A

    E. Cotner and A. Kusenko, Phys. Rev. D 96, 103002 (2017), arXiv:1706.09003 [astro-ph.CO]

  108. [116]

    Cotner, A

    E. Cotner, A. Kusenko, and V. Takhistov, Phys. Rev. D 98, 083513 (2018), arXiv:1801.03321 [astro-ph.CO]

  109. [117]

    Cotner, A

    E. Cotner, A. Kusenko, M. Sasaki, and V. Takhistov, JCAP 10, 077 (2019), arXiv:1907.10613 [astro-ph.CO]

  110. [118]

    S. G. Rubin, M. Y. Khlopov, and A. S. Sakharov, Grav. Cosmol. Suppl. 6, 51 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/0005271

  111. [119]

    S. G. Rubin, A. S. Sakharov, and M. Y. Khlopov, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 91, 921 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0106187

  112. [120]

    Dokuchaev, Y

    V. Dokuchaev, Y. Eroshenko, and S. Rubin, Grav. Cosmol. 11, 99 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0412418

  113. [121]

    M. Y. Khlopov, R. V. Konoplich, S. G. Rubin, and A. S. Sakharov, Grav. Cosmol. 6, 153 (2000)

  114. [122]

    Ge, Phys

    S. Ge, Phys. Dark Univ. 27, 100440 (2020), arXiv:1905.12182 [hep-ph]

  115. [123]

    Garriga, A

    J. Garriga, A. Vilenkin, and J. Zhang, JCAP 02, 064 (2016), arXiv:1512.01819 [hep-th]

  116. [124]

    H. Deng, J. Garriga, and A. Vilenkin, JCAP 04, 050 (2017), arXiv:1612.03753 [gr-qc]

  117. [125]

    Deng and A

    H. Deng and A. Vilenkin, JCAP 12, 044 (2017), arXiv:1710.02865 [gr-qc]

  118. [126]

    Liu, Z.-K

    J. Liu, Z.-K. Guo, and R.-G. Cai, Phys. Rev. D 101, 023513 (2020), arXiv:1908.02662 [astro-ph.CO]

  119. [127]

    M. Kopp, S. Hofmann, and J. Weller, Phys. Rev. D 83, 124025 (2011), arXiv:1012.4369 [astro-ph.CO]

  120. [128]

    Harada and B

    T. Harada and B. J. Carr, Phys. Rev. D 71, 104009 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0412134

  121. [129]

    Akrami et al

    Y. Akrami et al. (Planck), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A10 (2020), arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]

  122. [130]

    Sendouda, S

    Y. Sendouda, S. Nagataki, and K. Sato, JCAP 06, 003 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0603509

  123. [131]

    Johnson, JCAP 09, 046 (2020), arXiv:2005.07467 [astro-ph.CO]

    G. Johnson, JCAP 09, 046 (2020), arXiv:2005.07467 [astro-ph.CO]

  124. [132]

    J. D. Barrow, Phys. Rev. D 46, R3227 (1992)

  125. [133]

    J. D. Barrow and B. J. Carr, Phys. Rev. D 54, 3920 (1996)

  126. [134]

    Harada, C

    T. Harada, C. Goymer, and B. J. Carr, Phys. Rev. D 66, 104023 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0112563

  127. [135]

    I. D. Novikov, A. G. Polnarev, A. A. Starobinsky, and Y. B. Zeldovich, Astron. Astrophys. 80, 104 (1979)

  128. [136]

    A. S. Josan, A. M. Green, and K. A. Malik, Phys. Rev. D 79, 103520 (2009), arXiv:0903.3184 [astro-ph.CO]

  129. [137]

    B. Carr, K. Kohri, Y. Sendouda, and J. Yokoyama, Phys. Rev. D 81, 104019 (2010), arXiv:0912.5297 [astro-ph.CO]

  130. [138]

    S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975), [Erratum-ibid. 46, 206 (1976)]. 60

  131. [139]

    B. J. Carr, Astrophys. J. 206, 8 (1976)

  132. [140]

    B. V. Lehmann, C. Johnson, S. Profumo, and T. Schwemberger, JCAP 10, 046 (2019), arXiv:1906.06348 [hep-ph]

  133. [141]

    D. N. Page, Phys. Rev. D 13, 198 (1976)

  134. [142]

    J. H. MacGibbon, Phys. Rev. D 44, 376 (1991)

  135. [143]

    J. H. MacGibbon and B. R. Webber, Phys. Rev. D 41, 3052 (1990)

  136. [144]

    J. H. MacGibbon, B. J. Carr, and D. N. Page, Phys. Rev. D 78, 064043 (2008), arXiv:0709.2380 [astro-ph]

  137. [145]

    Raidal, S

    M. Raidal, S. Solodukhin, V. Vaskonen, and H. Veerm¨ ae, Phys. Rev. D 97, 123520 (2018), arXiv:1802.07728 [astro- ph.CO]

  138. [146]

    Lemoine, Phys

    M. Lemoine, Phys. Lett. B 481, 333 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/0001238

  139. [147]

    S. K. Acharya and R. Khatri, JCAP 06, 018 (2020), arXiv:2002.00898 [astro-ph.CO]

  140. [148]

    Chluba, A

    J. Chluba, A. Ravenni, and S. K. Acharya, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 498, 959 (2020), arXiv:2005.11325 [astro-ph.CO]

  141. [149]

    Dasgupta, R

    B. Dasgupta, R. Laha, and A. Ray, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 101101 (2020), arXiv:1912.01014 [hep-ph]

  142. [150]

    B. J. Carr, K. Kohri, Y. Sendouda, and J. Yokoyama, Phys. Rev. D 94, 044029 (2016), arXiv:1604.05349 [astro-ph.CO]

  143. [151]

    Boudaud and M

    M. Boudaud and M. Cirelli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 041104 (2019), arXiv:1807.03075 [astro-ph.HE]

  144. [152]

    R. Laha, J. B. Mu˜ noz, and T. R. Slatyer, Phys. Rev. D 101, 123514 (2020), arXiv:2004.00627 [astro-ph.CO]

  145. [153]

    Coogan, L

    A. Coogan, L. Morrison, and S. Profumo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 171101 (2021), arXiv:2010.04797 [astro-ph.CO]

  146. [154]

    DeRocco and P

    W. DeRocco and P. W. Graham, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 251102 (2019), arXiv:1906.07740 [astro-ph.CO]

  147. [155]

    Laha, Phys

    R. Laha, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 251101 (2019), arXiv:1906.09994 [astro-ph.HE]

  148. [156]

    M. H. Chan and C. M. Lee, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 497, 1212 (2020), arXiv:2007.05677 [astro-ph.HE]

  149. [157]

    Kim, 10.1093/mnras/stab1222, arXiv:2007.07739 [hep-ph]

    H. Kim, 10.1093/mnras/stab1222, arXiv:2007.07739 [hep-ph]

  150. [158]

    B. V. Vainer and P. D. Naselskii, Astron. Zh. 55, 231 (1978), [Sov. Astron. 22, 138 (1978)]

  151. [159]

    Miyama and K

    S. Miyama and K. Sato, Prog. Theor. Phys. 59, 1012 (1978)

  152. [160]

    Y. B. Zel’dovich, A. A. Starobinskii, M. I. Khlopov, and V. M. Chechetkin, Pisma Astron. Zh. 3, 208 (1977), [Sov. Astron. Lett. 3, 110 (1977)]

  153. [161]

    Lindley, Mon

    D. Lindley, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 193, 593 (1980)

  154. [162]

    J. R. Ellis, G. Gelmini, J. L. Lopez, D. V. Nanopoulos, and S. Sarkar, Nucl. Phys. B 373, 399 (1992)

  155. [163]

    Kohri and J

    K. Kohri and J. Yokoyama, Phys. Rev. D 61, 023501 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9908160

  156. [164]

    Kawasaki, K

    M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri, T. Moroi, and Y. Takaesu, Phys. Rev. D 97, 023502 (2018), arXiv:1709.01211 [hep-ph]

  157. [165]

    Kawasaki, K

    M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri, T. Moroi, K. Murai, and H. Murayama, JCAP 12, 048 (2020), arXiv:2006.14803 [hep-ph]

  158. [166]

    Kawasaki, K

    M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri, and T. Moroi, Phys. Rev. D 71, 083502 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0408426

  159. [167]

    Kawasaki, K

    M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri, and T. Moroi, Phys. Lett. B 625, 7 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0402490

  160. [168]

    Keith, D

    C. Keith, D. Hooper, N. Blinov, and S. D. McDermott, Phys. Rev. D 102, 103512 (2020), arXiv:2006.03608 [astro-ph.CO]

  161. [169]

    Coc, in Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Nuclei in the Cosmos (NIC2016) , JPS Conf

    A. Coc, in Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Nuclei in the Cosmos (NIC2016) , JPS Conf. Proc., Vol. 14 (2017) p. 010102, Niigata, Japan, June 19-24, 2016

  162. [170]

    A. J. Korn, F. Grundahl, O. Richard, P. Barklem, L. Mashonkina, R. Collet, N. Piskunov, and B. Gustafsson, Nature 442, 657 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0608201

  163. [171]

    X. Fu, A. Bressan, P. Molaro, and P. Marigo, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 452, 3256 (2015), arXiv:1506.05993 [astro- ph.SR]

  164. [172]

    A. Coc, M. Pospelov, J.-P. Uzan, and E. Vangioni, Phys. Rev. D 90, 085018 (2014), arXiv:1405.1718 [hep-ph]

  165. [173]

    Goudelis, M

    A. Goudelis, M. Pospelov, and J. Pradler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 211303 (2016), arXiv:1510.08858 [hep-ph]

  166. [174]

    Sarkar and A

    S. Sarkar and A. M. Cooper-Sarkar, Phys. Lett. B 148, 347 (1984)

  167. [175]

    Hu and J

    W. Hu and J. Silk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2661 (1993)

  168. [176]

    Tashiro and N

    H. Tashiro and N. Sugiyama, Phys. Rev. D 78, 023004 (2008), arXiv:0801.3172 [astro-ph]

  169. [177]

    Lucca, N

    M. Lucca, N. Sch¨ oneberg, D. C. Hooper, J. Lesgourgues, and J. Chluba, JCAP 02, 026 (2020), arXiv:1910.04619 [astro- ph.CO]

  170. [178]

    S. K. Acharya and R. Khatri, JCAP 02, 010 (2020), arXiv:1912.10995 [astro-ph.CO]

  171. [179]

    R. A. Sunyaev and J. Chluba, Astron. Nachr. 330, 657 (2009), arXiv:0908.0435 [astro-ph.CO]

  172. [180]

    Chluba, Mon

    J. Chluba, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 402, 1195 (2010), arXiv:0910.3663 [astro-ph.CO]

  173. [181]

    T. R. Slatyer, N. Padmanabhan, and D. P. Finkbeiner, Phys. Rev. D 80, 043526 (2009), arXiv:0906.1197 [astro-ph.CO]

  174. [182]

    J. A. Adams, S. Sarkar, and D. Sciama, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 301, 210 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9805108

  175. [183]

    Zhang, X

    L. Zhang, X. Chen, M. Kamionkowski, Z.-g. Si, and Z. Zheng, Phys. Rev. D 76, 061301(R) (2007), arXiv:0704.2444 [astro-ph]

  176. [184]

    J. H. MacGibbon and B. J. Carr, Astrophys. J. 371, 447 (1991)

  177. [185]

    Chen and M

    X.-L. Chen and M. Kamionkowski, Phys. Rev. D 70, 043502 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0310473

  178. [186]

    X.-H. Fan, C. L. Carilli, and B. G. Keating, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 44, 415 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0602375

  179. [187]

    Poulin, J

    V. Poulin, J. Lesgourgues, and P. D. Serpico, JCAP 03, 043 (2017), arXiv:1610.10051 [astro-ph.CO]

  180. [188]

    St¨ ocker, M

    P. St¨ ocker, M. Kr¨ amer, J. Lesgourgues, and V. Poulin, JCAP03, 018 (2018), arXiv:1801.01871 [astro-ph.CO]

  181. [189]

    Poulter, Y

    H. Poulter, Y. Ali-Ha¨ ımoud, J. Hamann, M. White, and A. G. Williams, arXiv:1907.06485 [astro-ph.CO]

  182. [190]

    B. J. Carr and J. H. MacGibbon, Phys. Rept. 307, 141 (1998)

  183. [191]

    Ackermann et al

    M. Ackermann et al. (Fermi-LAT), Astrophys. J. 799, 86 (2015), arXiv:1410.3696 [astro-ph.HE]

  184. [192]

    Barrau, G

    A. Barrau, G. Boudoul, and L. Derome, in Proceedings of the 28th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2003) (2003) pp. 1697–1699, Tsukuba, Japan, July 31-August 7, 2003, arXiv:astro-ph/0304528

  185. [193]

    Ballesteros, J

    G. Ballesteros, J. Coronado-Bl´ azquez, and D. Gaggero, Phys. Lett. B808, 135624 (2020), arXiv:1906.10113 [astro-ph.CO]

  186. [194]

    Arbey, J

    A. Arbey, J. Auffinger, and J. Silk, Phys. Rev. D 101, 023010 (2020), arXiv:1906.04750 [astro-ph.CO]. 61

  187. [195]

    Fukuda and K

    H. Fukuda and K. Nakayama, JHEP 01, 128 (2020), arXiv:1910.06308 [hep-ph]

  188. [196]

    P. B. Ferraz, T. W. Kephart, and J. G. Rosa, arXiv:2004.11303 [gr-qc]

  189. [197]

    E. L. Wright, Astrophys. J. 459, 487 (1996), astro-ph/9509074

  190. [198]

    Sreekumar et al

    P. Sreekumar et al. (EGRET), Astrophys. J. 494, 523 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9709257

  191. [199]

    Malek et al

    M. Malek et al. (Super-Kamiokande), Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 061101 (2003), arXiv:hep-ex/0209028

  192. [200]

    E. V. Bugaev and K. V. Konishchev, Phys. Rev. D 66, 084004 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0206082

  193. [201]

    Bugaev and P

    E. Bugaev and P. Klimai, Phys. Rev. D 79, 103511 (2009), arXiv:0812.4247 [astro-ph]

  194. [202]

    Lunardini and Y

    C. Lunardini and Y. F. Perez-Gonzalez, JCAP 08, 014 (2020), arXiv:1910.07864 [hep-ph]

  195. [203]

    A. M. Green, Phys. Rev. D 60, 063516 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9903484

  196. [204]

    M. Y. Khlopov, A. Barrau, and J. Grain, Class. Quant. Grav. 23, 1875 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0406621

  197. [205]

    Kohri, T

    K. Kohri, T. Moroi, and A. Yotsuyanagi, Phys. Rev. D 73, 123511 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0507245

  198. [206]

    Kawasaki, K

    M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri, T. Moroi, and A. Yotsuyanagi, Phys. Rev. D 78, 065011 (2008), arXiv:0804.3745 [hep-ph]

  199. [207]

    Fujita, M

    T. Fujita, M. Kawasaki, K. Harigaya, and R. Matsuda, Phys. Rev. D 89, 103501 (2014), arXiv:1401.1909 [astro-ph.CO]

  200. [208]

    Lennon, J

    O. Lennon, J. March-Russell, R. Petrossian-Byrne, and H. Tillim, JCAP 04, 009 (2018), arXiv:1712.07664 [hep-ph]

  201. [209]

    Morrison, S

    L. Morrison, S. Profumo, and Y. Yu, JCAP 05, 005 (2019), arXiv:1812.10606 [astro-ph.CO]

  202. [210]

    Auffinger, I

    J. Auffinger, I. Masina, and G. Orlando, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 261 (2021), arXiv:2012.09867 [hep-ph]

  203. [211]

    Hooper and G

    D. Hooper and G. Krnjaic, Phys. Rev. D 103, 043504 (2021), arXiv:2010.01134 [hep-ph]

  204. [212]

    Aghanim et al

    N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A5 (2020), arXiv:1907.12875 [astro-ph.CO]

  205. [213]

    K. M. Belotsky, A. A. Kirillov, N. O. Nazarova, and S. G. Rubin, Int. J. Mod. Phys. 26, 1750102 (2017), arXiv:1702.06338 [astro-ph.CO]

  206. [214]

    J. Cang, Y. Gao, and Y. Ma, arXiv:2011.12244 [astro-ph.CO]

  207. [215]

    K. J. Mack and D. H. Wesley, arXiv:0805.1531 [astro-ph]

  208. [216]

    Clark, B

    S. Clark, B. Dutta, Y. Gao, Y.-Z. Ma, and L. E. Strigari, Phys. Rev. D 98, 043006 (2018), arXiv:1803.09390 [astro-ph.HE]

  209. [217]

    Dutta, A

    B. Dutta, A. Kar, and L. E. Strigari, JCAP 03, 011 (2021), arXiv:2010.05977 [astro-ph.HE]

  210. [218]

    R. Laha, P. Lu, and V. Takhistov, arXiv:2009.11837 [astro-ph.CO]

  211. [219]

    M. S. Turner, Nature 297, 379 (1982)

  212. [220]

    Kiraly, J

    P. Kiraly, J. Szabelski, J. Wdowczyk, and A. W. Wolfendale, Nature 293, 120 (1981)

  213. [221]

    Yoshimura et al

    K. Yoshimura et al. (BESS), Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3792 (1995)

  214. [222]

    K. Maki, T. Mitsui, and S. Orito, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3474 (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9601025

  215. [223]

    Barrau, D

    A. Barrau, D. Blais, G. Boudoul, and D. Polarski, Phys. Lett. B 551, 218 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0210149

  216. [224]

    Orito et al

    S. Orito et al. (BESS), Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1078 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9906426

  217. [225]

    Boezio et al

    M. Boezio et al. (WiZard/CAPRICE), Astrophys. J. 561, 787 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0103513

  218. [226]

    Jacholkowska (AMS), Nucl

    A. Jacholkowska (AMS), Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 165, 324 (2007)

  219. [227]

    Barrau et al., Astron

    A. Barrau et al., Astron. Astrophys. 398, 403 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0207395

  220. [228]

    Abe et al

    K. Abe et al. (BESS), Phys. Lett. B 670, 103 (2008), arXiv:0805.1754 [astro-ph]

  221. [229]

    Bambi, A

    C. Bambi, A. D. Dolgov, and A. A. Petrov, Phys. Lett. B 670, 174 (2008), [Erratum: Phys. Lett. B 681, 504 (2009)], arXiv:0801.2786 [astro-ph]

  222. [230]

    D. V. Semikoz, Astrophys. J. 436, 254 (1994)

  223. [231]

    N. A. Porter and T. C. Weekes, Nature 277, 199 (1979)

  224. [232]

    Carter, G

    B. Carter, G. W. Gibbons, D. N. C. Lin, and M. J. Perry, Astron. Astrophys. 52, 427 (1976)

  225. [233]

    C. E. Fichtel et al., Astrophys. J. 434, 557 (1994)

  226. [234]

    Halzen, E

    F. Halzen, E. Zas, J. H. MacGibbon, and T. C. Weekes, Nature 353, 807 (1991)

  227. [235]

    D. B. Cline and W. Hong, Astrophys. J. 401, L57 (1992)

  228. [236]

    D. B. Cline and W. Hong, Astropart. Phys. 5, 175 (1996)

  229. [237]

    D. B. Cline, C. Matthey, and S. Otwinowski, Astropart. Phys. 18, 531 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0110276

  230. [238]

    D. B. Cline, B. Czerny, C. Matthey, A. Janiuk, and S. Otwinowski, Astrophys. J. 633, L73 (2005), arXiv:astro- ph/0510309

  231. [239]

    D. B. Cline, C. Matthey, S. Otwinowski, B. Czerny, and A. Janiuk, Nuovo Cim. B 121, 1443 (2006), arXiv:astro- ph/0608158

  232. [240]

    D. B. Cline and S. Otwinowski, arXiv:0908.1352 [astro-ph.CO]

  233. [241]

    T. N. Ukwatta et al., in Proceedings of the 6th Huntsville Symposium on Gamma-Ray Bursts , AIP Conf. Proc., Vol. 1133 (2009) pp. 440–442, arXiv:0901.0542 [astro-ph.HE]

  234. [242]

    SN 1987A, Quark Phase Transition in Compact Objects and Multimessenger Astronomy

    V. Petkov, E. Bugaev, and P. Klimai, in Proceedings of the International Conference “SN 1987A, Quark Phase Transition in Compact Objects and Multimessenger Astronomy” (2018) pp. 158–164, arXiv:1912.01317 [astro-ph.HE]

  235. [243]

    Oliensis and C

    J. Oliensis and C. T. Hill, Phys. Lett. B 143, 92 (1984)

  236. [244]

    A. F. Heckler, Phys. Rev. D 55, 480 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9601029

  237. [245]

    A. F. Heckler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3430 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9702027

  238. [246]

    J. M. Cline, M. Mostoslavsky, and G. Servant, Phys. Rev. D 59, 063009 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9810439

  239. [247]

    J. I. Kapusta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1670 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0008222

  240. [248]

    R. G. Daghigh and J. I. Kapusta, Phys. Rev. D 65, 064028 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0109090

  241. [249]

    R. G. Daghigh and J. I. Kapusta, Phys. Rev. D 67, 044006 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0211579

  242. [250]

    R. G. Daghigh and J. I. Kapusta, Phys. Rev. D 73, 124024 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0604439

  243. [251]

    A. A. Belyanin, V. V. Kocharovsky, and V. V. Kocharovsky, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 283, 626 (1996)

  244. [252]

    Bugaev, P

    E. Bugaev, P. Klimai, and V. Petkov, in Proceedings of the 30th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2007) , 62 Vol. 3 (2007) pp. 1123–1126, Merida, Yucatan, Mexico, July 3-11, 2007, arXiv:0706.3778 [astro-ph]

  245. [253]

    D. E. Alexandreas et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2524 (1993)

  246. [254]

    Amenomori et al

    M. Amenomori et al. (Tibet ASγ), Astron. Astrophys. 311, 919 (1996)

  247. [255]

    Linton et al., JCAP 01, 013 (2006)

    E. Linton et al., JCAP 01, 013 (2006)

  248. [256]

    V. B. Petkov et al., Astron. Lett. 34, 509 (2008), [Pisma Astron. Zh. 34, 563 (2008)], arXiv:0808.3093 [astro-ph]

  249. [257]

    V. B. Petkov, E. V. Bugaev, P. A. Klimai, and D. V. Smirnov, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. Lett. 87, 1 (2008), arXiv:0803.2313 [astro-ph]

  250. [258]

    E. V. Bugaev et al., arXiv:0906.3182 [astro-ph.CO]

  251. [259]

    Albert et al

    A. Albert et al. (HAWC), JCAP 04, 026 (2020), arXiv:1911.04356 [astro-ph.HE]

  252. [260]

    Hiscock, Phys

    W. Hiscock, Phys. Rev. D 35, 1161 (1987)

  253. [261]

    Gregory, I

    R. Gregory, I. G. Moss, and B. Withers, JHEP 03, 081 (2014), arXiv:1401.0017 [hep-th]

  254. [262]

    Burda, R

    P. Burda, R. Gregory, and I. Moss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 071303 (2015), arXiv:1501.04937 [hep-th]

  255. [263]

    Burda, R

    P. Burda, R. Gregory, and I. Moss, JHEP 08, 114 (2015), arXiv:1503.07331 [hep-th]

  256. [264]

    Burda, R

    P. Burda, R. Gregory, and I. Moss, JHEP 06, 025 (2016), arXiv:1601.02152 [hep-th]

  257. [265]

    Mukaida and M

    K. Mukaida and M. Yamada, Phys. Rev. D 96, 103514 (2017), arXiv:1706.04523 [hep-th]

  258. [266]

    Kohri and H

    K. Kohri and H. Matsui, Phys. Rev. D 98, 123509 (2018), arXiv:1708.02138 [hep-ph]

  259. [267]

    Hayashi, K

    T. Hayashi, K. Kamada, N. Oshita, and J. Yokoyama, JHEP 08, 088 (2020), arXiv:2005.12808 [hep-th]

  260. [268]

    D.-C. Dai, R. Gregory, and D. Stojkovic, Phys. Rev. D 101, 125012 (2020), arXiv:1909.00773 [hep-ph]

  261. [269]

    J. H. MacGibbon, Nature 329, 308 (1987)

  262. [270]

    J. D. Barrow, E. J. Copeland, and A. R. Liddle, Phys. Rev. D 46, 645 (1992)

  263. [271]

    A. M. Green and A. R. Liddle, Phys. Rev. D 56, 6166 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9704251

  264. [272]

    Alexeyev, A

    S. Alexeyev, A. Barrau, G. Boudoul, O. Khovanskaya, and M. Sazhin, Class. Quant. Grav. 19, 4431 (2002), arXiv:gr- qc/0201069

  265. [273]

    Chen and R

    P. Chen and R. J. Adler, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 124, 103 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0205106

  266. [274]

    Chen, New Astron

    P. Chen, New Astron. Rev. 49, 233 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0406514

  267. [275]

    Nozari and S

    K. Nozari and S. H. Mehdipour, Mod. Phys. Lett. A20, 2937 (2005), arXiv:0809.3144 [gr-qc]

  268. [276]

    Cai and S.-J

    R.-G. Cai and S.-J. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 101, 043508 (2020), arXiv:1910.07981 [astro-ph.CO]

  269. [277]

    Alexander and P

    S. Alexander and P. M´ esz´ aros, arXiv:hep-th/0703070

  270. [278]

    Bai and N

    Y. Bai and N. Orlofsky, Phys. Rev. D 101, 055006 (2020), arXiv:1906.04858 [hep-ph]

  271. [279]

    de Freitas Pacheco and J

    J. de Freitas Pacheco and J. Silk, Phys. Rev. D 101, 083022 (2020), arXiv:2003.12072 [astro-ph.CO]

  272. [280]

    Aghanim et al

    N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020), arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

  273. [281]

    K. J. Mack, J. P. Ostriker, and M. Ricotti, Astrophys. J. 665, 1277 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0608642

  274. [282]

    Capela, M

    F. Capela, M. Pshirkov, and P. Tinyakov, Phys. Rev. D 87, 123524 (2013), arXiv:1301.4984 [astro-ph.CO]

  275. [283]

    Clesse and J

    S. Clesse and J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, Phys. Dark Univ.15, 142 (2017), arXiv:1603.05234 [astro-ph.CO]

  276. [284]

    Sasaki, T

    M. Sasaki, T. Suyama, T. Tanaka, and S. Yokoyama, Class. Quant. Grav. 35, 063001 (2018), arXiv:1801.05235 [astro- ph.CO]

  277. [285]

    A. W. Strong, I. V. Moskalenko, and O. Reimer, Astrophys. J. 613, 956 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0405441

  278. [286]

    Niikura, M

    H. Niikura, M. Takada, S. Yokoyama, T. Sumi, and S. Masaki, Phys. Rev. D 99, 083503 (2019), arXiv:1901.07120 [astro-ph.CO]

  279. [287]

    H. K. Vedantham et al., Astrophys. J. 845, 89 (2017), arXiv:1702.06582 [astro-ph.HE]

  280. [288]

    Smyth, S

    N. Smyth, S. Profumo, S. English, T. Jeltema, K. McKinnon, and P. Guhathakurta, Phys. Rev. D 101, 063005 (2020), arXiv:1910.01285 [astro-ph.CO]

  281. [289]

    Griest, A

    K. Griest, A. M. Cieplak, and M. J. Lehner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 181302 (2013)

  282. [290]

    Griest, A

    K. Griest, A. M. Cieplak, and M. J. Lehner, Astrophys. J. 786, 158 (2014), arXiv:1307.5798 [astro-ph.CO]

  283. [291]

    Tisserand et al

    P. Tisserand et al. (EROS-2), Astron. Astrophys. 469, 387 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0607207

  284. [292]

    Alcock et al

    C. Alcock et al. (MACHO), Astrophys. J. Lett. 550, L169 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0011506

  285. [293]

    Oguri, J

    M. Oguri, J. M. Diego, N. Kaiser, P. L. Kelly, and T. Broadhurst, Phys. Rev. D 97, 023518 (2018), arXiv:1710.00148 [astro-ph.CO]

  286. [294]

    Zumalac´ arregui and U

    M. Zumalac´ arregui and U. Seljak, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 141101 (2018), arXiv:1712.02240 [astro-ph.CO]

  287. [295]

    P. N. Wilkinson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 584 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0101328

  288. [296]

    Barnacka, J

    A. Barnacka, J. F. Glicenstein, and R. Moderski, Phys. Rev. D 86, 043001 (2012), arXiv:1204.2056 [astro-ph.CO]

  289. [297]

    Niikura et al., Nature Astron

    H. Niikura et al., Nature Astron. 3, 524 (2019), arXiv:1701.02151 [astro-ph.CO]

  290. [298]

    G. F. Marani, R. J. Nemiroff, J. P. Norris, K. Hurley, and J. T. Bonnell, Astrophys. J. Lett. 512, L13 (1999), arXiv:astro- ph/9810391

  291. [299]

    R. J. Nemiroff, G. F. Marani, J. P. Norris, and J. T. Bonnell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 580 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0101488

  292. [300]

    A. Katz, J. Kopp, S. Sibiryakov, and W. Xue, JCAP 12, 005 (2018), arXiv:1807.11495 [astro-ph.CO]

Pith tools

Reviewed May 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.