Pith. Sign in

REVIEW

The SRG/eROSITA All-Sky Survey: Early dark energy and Hubble constant from the cluster mass function

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics · Submitted 7 Sep 2026 · Published version · 300 references

Pith's verdict: First EDE constraints from cluster counts, but the 3.2-sigma detection is fragile — the halo mass function for EDE cosmologies is validated on only one simulation, and uncalibrated systematics could dissolve the signal.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on September 9, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

  1. T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
  2. T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
  3. T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
  4. T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
  5. T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 2 major objections · 6 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →
Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2609.07834 (version 1)
Pith IDIFULR3ON, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationA. Liu, A. Merloni, E. Artis, E. Bulbul, F. Balzer, F. Kleinebreil, H. Miyatake, I. Chiu, J. Comparat, J. S. Sanders, J. Strunk, K. Nandra, M. E. Ramos-Ceja, M. Kluge, N. Clerc, N. Malavasi, N. Okabe, R. Seppi, S. Grandis, S. Miyazaki, S. Zelmer, T. Mistele, T. Schrabback, V. Ghirardini, X. Zhang, Z. Ding. "The SRG/eROSITA All-Sky Survey: Early dark energy and Hubble constant from the cluster mass function." arXiv:2609.07834 (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IFULR3ON
Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper
Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Referee report
The paper

The paper claims

Galaxy cluster counts from eROSITA yield a 3.2σ hint of early dark energy and a Hubble constant consistent with late universe measurements.

The reading

The paper uses the largest X-ray selected cluster sample from eROSITA first all-sky survey (eRASS1) to contrain early dark energy (EDE), a proposed extension of ΛCDM that adds a scalar field boosting the expansion rate just before recombination. Cluster number counts are sensetive to the suppression of structure growth caste by EDE, providing a complementay probe to the cosmic microwave background. When combined with Planck, ACT, CMB lensing, and DESI BAO data, the analysis finds a 3.2σ prefrence for non-zer f_EDE = 0.$10^{{+0.04}}$_{-0.03} and an infered H₀ = 71.4 ± 1.4 km $s^{{-1}}$ $Mpc^{{-1}}$, directly compatible with late universe calibrations. This is the first time galagy cluster abundances have been sued to test EDE, opnning a new observtional window on the Hubble tension.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the halo mass function for EDE cosmologies, constructed by computing the linear matter power spectrum with the EarlyQuintessence module in CAMB and adopting the Tinker et al. (2008) multiplicity function f(σ) calibrated in ΛCDM, under the assumtion that EDE affects clustering only through the linear power spectrum. The EDE model is parameterized by f_EDE (peak energy fraction), log10 z_c (critical redshift), and θ_i (initial field displacement). The cluster abundnce likelihood is compined with external CMB, lensing and BAO posteriors via kemel density estimtion.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper estabishes that the cluster mass function, measured from 4196 eRASS1 clusters at z<0.45 with weak lemsing mass calibrtion, can constrain EDE paramters. While eRASS1 alone gives only an upper limit f_EDE<0.3, a full Bayesian joint analysis with external CMB, lensing and BAO datasets yields f_EDE = 0.$10^{{+0.04}}$_{-0.03}, log10(z_c)=3.53±0.09, and H₀=71.4±1.4 km $s^{{-1}}$ $Mpc^{{-1}}$. This result is obtained without any distnce-lawer calibration, making it an independent test that favors an EDE soltion to the Hubble tension.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes that the Tinker et al. (2008) halo mass function calibration from ΛCDM simulations accurately describes cluster abundances in EDE cosmologies; this was validated against only one N-body simulation (Klypin et al. 2021) with fixed EDE paramters, and the paper notes no broader validation exists.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the dection holds, the Hubble tenson between early and late universe measurements is reslved by an early dark energy component making up ~10 % of the energy density around recombinaton.
  • The consisency between cluster counts and CMB+BAO data suges that large-scale structure and CMB jointy favor enhnced small-scale power, with implications for galxy formation at high redshift.
  • Cluster abundance analyses become a new, independent probe of EDE, complementay to CMB primary anisotrpy and galxy clustering (e.g., BOSS full-shape).
  • Future survys like eRASS2 will improve statistial precision by a factor of several, enabling a deisive test of the EDE hypothesis.
Original abstract

The evolution of the mass function of massive galaxy clusters is a well-established probe of cosmology. Using the eROSITA X-ray instrument on board the Spectrum Roentgen Gamma (SRG) mission, the western Galactic hemisphere of eROSITA's first All-Sky Survey (eRASS1) delivers a uniformly selected and securely confirmed sample of 5259 galaxy clusters spanning $0.1 < z < 0.8$. When combined with overlapping weak lensing data from DES Year 3, KiDS, and HSC for mass calibration, this dataset enables precise tests of the standard $\Lambda$CDM framework and beyond. In this work, we use the $0.1 < z < 0.45$ subsample of the eRASS1 cluster catalog to place constraints on an axion-like Early Dark Energy (EDE) scenario. Such models have been proposed as a possible mechanism to alleviate the tension between early- and late-Universe measurements of the Hubble constant. In this framework, a scalar field temporarily enhances the cosmic expansion rate around the epoch of recombination before rapidly diluting at later times, leaving distinct imprints on structure growth. We leverage these signatures to present the first constraints on EDE derived from galaxy cluster number counts. Using eRASS1 number counts alone, we obtain an upper limit on the maximum EDE fraction of $f_{\rm EDE} < 0.3$, consistent with primary CMB analyses. Combining our cluster analysis with primary CMB measurements, baryon acoustic oscillations, and CMB lensing, while notably excluding distance-ladder calibration data, yields results consistent with a nonzero EDE contribution and $H_0$ values compatible with late-Universe measurements. The most significant detection, at $\sim 3.2\sigma$, arises from the joint analysis of the eRASS1 sample with the full set of external datasets, yielding $f_{\rm EDE} = 0.10^{+0.04}_{-0.03}$ and $H_0 = 71.4 \pm 1.4$ km/s/Mpc. [ABRIDGED]

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 8,030 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.91 · states limitation 0.71 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.15 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.93 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The evolution of the mass function of massive galaxy clusters is a well-established probe of cosmology. Using the eROSITA X-ray instrument on board the Spectrum Roentgen Gamma (SRG) mission, the western Galactic hemisphere of eROSITA's first All-Sky Survey (eRASS1) delivers a uniformly selected and securely confirmed sample of 5259 galaxy clusters spanning $0.1 < z < 0.8$. When combined with overlapping weak lensing data from DES Year 3, KiDS, and HSC for mass calibration, this dataset enables precise tests of the standard $\Lambda$CDM framework and beyond. In this work, we use the $0.1 < z < 0.45$ subsample of the eRASS1 cluster catalog to place constraints on an axion-like Early Dark Energy (EDE) scenario. Such models have been proposed as a possible mechanism to alleviate the tension between early- and late-Universe measurements of the Hubble constant. In this framework, a scalar field temporarily enhances the cosmic expansion rate around the epoch of recombination before rapidly diluting at later times, leaving distinct imprints on structure growth. We leverage these signatures to present the first constraints on EDE derived from galaxy cluster number counts. Using eRASS1 number counts alone, we obtain an upper limit on the maximum EDE fraction of $f_{\rm EDE} < 0.3$, consistent with primary CMB analyses. Combining our cluster analysis with primary CMB measurements, baryon acoustic oscillations, and CMB lensing, while notably excluding distance-ladder calibration data, yields results consistent with a nonzero EDE contribution and $H_0$ values compatible with late-Universe measurements. The most significant detection, at $\sim 3.2\sigma$, arises from the joint analysis of the eRASS1 sample with the full set of external datasets, yielding $f_{\rm EDE} = 0.10^{+0.04}_{-0.03}$ and $H_0 = 71.4 \pm 1.4$ km/s/Mpc. [ABRIDGED]

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The evolution of the mass function of massive galaxy clusters is a well-established probe of cosmology. background 1.00 0.03 0.01 asserted 1.00
s1 Using the eROSITA X-ray instrument on board the Spectrum Roentgen Gamma (SRG) mission, the western Galactic hemisphere of eROSITA's first All-Sky Survey (eRASS1) delivers a uniformly selected and securely confirmed sample of 5259 galaxy clusters spanning $0.1 < z < 0.8$. method 0.92 0.89 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 When combined with overlapping weak lensing data from DES Year 3, KiDS, and HSC for mass calibration, this dataset enables precise tests of the standard $\Lambda$CDM framework and beyond. method 0.88 0.53 0.03 asserted 0.94
s3 In this work, we use the $0.1 < z < 0.45$ subsample of the eRASS1 cluster catalog to place constraints on an axion-like Early Dark Energy (EDE) scenario. contribution 0.67 0.96 0.05 asserted 0.99
s4 Such models have been proposed as a possible mechanism to alleviate the tension between early- and late-Universe measurements of the Hubble constant. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 hedged possibility 0.92
s5 In this framework, a scalar field temporarily enhances the cosmic expansion rate around the epoch of recombination before rapidly diluting at later times, leaving distinct imprints on structure growth. background 0.99 0.05 0.03 asserted 0.99
s6 We leverage these signatures to present the first constraints on EDE derived from galaxy cluster number counts. contribution 0.99 0.95 0.13 asserted 1.00
s7 Using eRASS1 number counts alone, we obtain an upper limit on the maximum EDE fraction of $f_{\rm EDE} < 0.3$, consistent with primary CMB analyses. result 1.00 0.97 0.13 asserted 0.99
s8 Combining our cluster analysis with primary CMB measurements, baryon acoustic oscillations, and CMB lensing, while notably excluding distance-ladder calibration data, yields results consistent with a nonzero EDE contribution and $H_0$ values compatible with late-Universe measurements. result 0.94 0.93 0.27 hedged possibility 0.81
s9 The most significant detection, at $\sim 3.2\sigma$, arises from the joint analysis of the eRASS1 sample with the full set of external datasets, yielding $f_{\rm EDE} = 0.10^{+0.04}_{-0.03}$ and $H_0 = 71.4 \pm 1.4$ km/s/Mpc. [ABRIDGED] result 1.00 0.96 0.80 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 0.99 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.73.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

Figures
Figure 1. Relative difference in the linear matter power spectrum between EDE cosmologies and ΛCDM (based on the Planck best-fit parameters). The fiducial EDE cosmology, plotted in black, is evaluated at the best￾fit parameters reported in Smith et al. (2020). Additional fractions of early dark energy are also plotted, showing enhanced small-scale power suppression with increasing fEDE. the S 8 discrepancy, see e.g. Abdalla et al. 2022; Perivolaropou￾los & Skara 2022; Di Valentino et al. 2025, for detailed reviews), joint CMB and LSS analyses have frequently argued that LSS data disfavor EDE…
Figure 2. Halo mass function (M500c) at different redshifts. Solid lines rep￾resent the HMF for an EDE cosmology derived through Equation 28 using the Tinker et al. (2008) multiplicity function, for the best-fit pa￾rameters reported in Smith et al. (2020). Points with error bars show the binned EDE halo abundances computed from the Klypin et al. (2021) N￾Body Simulations for the same cosmology, with their associated Pois￾son uncertainty. Dashed lines represent the ΛCDM HMF model using the Tinker et al. (2008) multiplicity function, evaluated at the Planck best-fit parameters. The bottom panel…
Figure 4. Marginalized posteriors for the param￾eters Ωm, σ8, S 8 and fEDE constrained in a flat ΛCDM model with an EDE extension for the eRASS1 z < 0.45 analysis, in orange filled contours. For comparison, we show the posteri￾ors reported in ACT-EDE, including ACT-DR6 with a prior on τreio (in cyan-filled contours), and the ACT data combined with Planck20 (in gray solid lines). We also show the constraints from the eRASS1 ΛCDM analysis published in G24, in filled purple contours
Figure 5. Marginalized posteriors for the param￾eters Ωm, σ8, S 8 and fEDE constrained in a flat ΛCDM model with an EDE extension for the eRASS1 analysis combined with CMB data. In orange, we show the eRASS1-only analysis. The figure includes the EDE results published in ACT-EDE, for Planck20 and ACT-DR6, in dark gray filled contours. We show in cyan lines the results for eRASS1 combined with ACT DR6 data, and in solid red lines the results for the joint eRASS1, Planck, and ACT analysis. Combined Planck, ACT, and eROSITA cluster number counts produce a 2.8σ detection of the EDE fraction of…
Figure 6. Marginalized posteriors for the pa￾rameters Ωm, σ8, S 8 and fEDE constrained for the eRASS1 EDE multiprobe joint analysis. In orange, we show the eRASS1-only con￾straints. The results of the eRASS1 joint anal￾ysis with Planck20, and ACT-DR6 are shown in solid blue lines. The reported results of the Planck20, ACT DR6 CMB anisotropy and lensing, and BAO from DESI (Adame et al. 2025) analysis are shown in light gray con￾tours (ACT-EDE), and the results of this com￾bination with eRASS1 are shown in solid red lines. When combined with CMB, BAO, and LSS data, eROSITA cluster number counts…
Figure 8. Representative whisker plot of the constraints obtained on fEDE, showing the differences in the constraints obtained using Bayesian anal￾ysis with and without a SH0ES prior, and profile likelihood analyses. In green, we show the Bayesian constraints from single CMB probes for ACT DR6 (ACT-EDE), Planck (McDonough et al. 2024), and SPT-3G (Khalife et al. 2026), as well as the Planck profile likelihood constraints (Herold & Ferreira 2023). In red, we show CMB multiprobe constraints, for ACT and Planck (ACT-EDE), as well as the combination of SPT, ACT, and Planck (Khalife et al. 2026).…

Showing 6 of the paper's 8 figures. See all figures in the PDF ↗ Figures reproduced from arXiv:2609.07834 by the authors.

References

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.