Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 61 cited by

Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Giant Planets, Oscillations, Rotation, and Massive Stars

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-05-10 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read MESA now models the full evolution of massive stars to core collapse via a new radiation-dominated envelope treatment.

desk verdict MESA update adds a practical envelope treatment for evolving massive stars to core collapse, plus incremental gains for planets, pulsations, and rotation. read the letter →

arxiv 1301.0319 v2 pith:MQK46YRB submitted 2013-01-02 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.IM

Bill Paxton , Matteo Cantiello , Phil Arras , Lars Bildsten , Edward F. Brown , Aaron Dotter , Christopher Mankovich , M. H. Montgomery
show 3 more authors
Dennis Stello F. X. Timmes Richard Townsend
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.IM
keywords stellarevolutionMESAmassivestarssupernovaprogenitorsasteroseismologyrotatinggiantplanetsLedouxcriterion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper updates the open-source MESA stellar evolution code with several new capabilities. It lowers the mass limit for giant planet models, fully couples an adiabatic pulsation code for asteroseismology, adds diffusion of angular momentum and chemicals for rotating stars, and improves the numerical solver for multi-core performance. The central advance is a new handling of radiation-dominated envelopes that lets massive-star models run continuously from the main sequence through core collapse without interruption. This change directly supports creation of updated grids for supernova, long gamma-ray burst, and pair-instability supernova progenitors. Updates to opacities, equations of state, nuclear rates, and boundary conditions are included along with a software development kit for reproducible builds.

What carries the argument

The new treatment of radiation-dominated envelopes, which recasts the coupled stellar structure and composition equations to prevent numerical breakdown in high-radiation zones and thereby permits continuous evolution to core collapse.

What would settle it

Comparison of the new massive-star tracks against observed supernova progenitor masses or core-collapse timing inferred from light curves; if the models still halt or produce unphysical envelope masses, the treatment fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors introduce a new treatment of radiation-dominated envelopes that allows the uninterrupted evolution of massive stars to core collapse. Combined with a numerical recasting of the Ledoux criterion for multi-species mixing, this change enables generation of new sets of supernovae, long gamma-ray burst, and pair-instability progenitor models while also extending the code to lower-mass giant planets and rotating stars.

Load-bearing premise

The numerical recasting of the Ledoux criterion and the envelope treatment accurately capture the underlying physics of mixing and structure without introducing significant artifacts when solving the full set of stellar equations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • New grids of supernova and pair-instability supernova progenitor models can now be produced without manual intervention at the envelope stage.
  • Long gamma-ray burst progenitor calculations become feasible for the first time within the same code framework.
  • Rotating-star models with consistent angular-momentum and chemical diffusion can be compared directly to earlier non-diffusive calculations.
  • Asteroseismic frequencies for 3-8 solar-mass stars can be computed self-consistently from the same evolutionary sequences.
  • Performance scaling on multi-core machines improves, allowing larger parameter surveys of planet and star models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The uninterrupted massive-star tracks could be used to map how envelope stripping affects the final black-hole mass distribution.
  • Coupling the new pulsation module to the rotating models would allow tests of how differential rotation alters mode frequencies observable by Kepler.
  • Extending the low-mass planet module to include the new envelope treatment might permit consistent modeling of highly irradiated hot Jupiters.
  • The performance gains suggest the code could now run statistical ensembles of massive-star models to quantify uncertainties in core-collapse outcomes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper presents substantial updates to the open-source MESA stellar evolution code and its MESA Star module. Key advances include extending giant-planet modeling to 0.1 Jupiter masses, full coupling to the ADIPLS pulsation code, a numerical recasting of the Ledoux criterion for multi-species mixing, diffusion of angular momentum and abundances for rotating stars with comparisons to prior literature, a new treatment of radiation-dominated envelopes that permits uninterrupted evolution of massive stars to core collapse (enabling new supernova, GRB, and pair-instability progenitor sets), solver modifications for improved multi-core scaling, and updates to EOS, opacities, nuclear rates, boundary conditions, plus the MESA SDK for reproducible builds.

Significance. If the new envelope treatment and Ledoux recasting function as described without introducing artifacts, the work is significant because it directly enables previously inaccessible progenitor models for core-collapse events and rotating massive stars. The open-source release, thorough comparisons for rotating models, and provision of the SDK for a unified build environment are explicit strengths that promote reproducibility and community use. These contributions advance the field by lowering barriers to complex stellar modeling.

major comments (2)
  1. [New treatment of radiation-dominated envelopes] The section describing the new treatment of radiation-dominated envelopes: the central claim that this modification permits uninterrupted evolution to core collapse (and thus new progenitor sets) is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative validation such as convergence tests, stability metrics through the radiation-dominated phase, or direct comparisons of final core properties against codes that previously failed. This leaves open whether the coupled structure-composition solver remains accurate.
  2. [Recasting of the Ledoux criterion] The section on the numerical recasting of the Ledoux criterion: while motivated by the presence of many nuclei, the explicit modified form of the criterion (presumably given as an equation) is not shown to reduce exactly to the standard Ledoux limit or to preserve the correct semi-convective/thermohaline behavior; without this demonstration the impact on mixing calculations for the exhibited 3-8 Msun tracks cannot be fully assessed.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract lists many updates but does not indicate what specific output (e.g., HR-diagram tracks or abundance profiles) is shown for the 3-8 Msun models; a single clarifying sentence would improve readability.
  2. [Rotating-star models] The rotating-star comparisons are described as 'thorough,' yet no table or figure quantifies differences in key observables (surface velocities, core rotation, or surface abundances) relative to the cited earlier work; adding such a summary would strengthen the claim.
  3. [Solver modifications] The solver scaling improvements are stated without accompanying performance data (e.g., wall-clock time vs. core count); a brief table or plot would make the multi-core benefit concrete.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive overall assessment and for the constructive major comments, which help strengthen the presentation of the new capabilities. We address each point below and will incorporate revisions in the next version of the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [New treatment of radiation-dominated envelopes] The section describing the new treatment of radiation-dominated envelopes: the central claim that this modification permits uninterrupted evolution to core collapse (and thus new progenitor sets) is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative validation such as convergence tests, stability metrics through the radiation-dominated phase, or direct comparisons of final core properties against codes that previously failed. This leaves open whether the coupled structure-composition solver remains accurate.

    Authors: We agree that additional quantitative validation would strengthen the manuscript for this central new feature. In the revised version we will add a dedicated subsection presenting convergence tests with respect to spatial and temporal resolution during the radiation-dominated phase, including stability metrics for the coupled structure-composition solver. We will also include direct comparisons of final core properties (central density, temperature, and composition at the onset of collapse) against earlier MESA models that terminated prematurely under the previous envelope treatment. These additions will confirm that the solver remains accurate and does not introduce artifacts. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Recasting of the Ledoux criterion] The section on the numerical recasting of the Ledoux criterion: while motivated by the presence of many nuclei, the explicit modified form of the criterion (presumably given as an equation) is not shown to reduce exactly to the standard Ledoux limit or to preserve the correct semi-convective/thermohaline behavior; without this demonstration the impact on mixing calculations for the exhibited 3-8 Msun tracks cannot be fully assessed.

    Authors: We acknowledge that an explicit demonstration of the limiting behavior is needed. The revised manuscript will include a new subsection (or short appendix) showing analytically that the numerical form reduces exactly to the classical Ledoux criterion when only a single composition variable is present or when composition gradients are negligible. We will also add test calculations confirming that the semi-convective and thermohaline mixing rates are unchanged in their standard regimes, with direct side-by-side comparisons of the resulting mixing profiles in the 3-8 solar-mass tracks. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper is a software methods description of numerical updates to the MESA stellar evolution code, including new implementations for radiation-dominated envelopes, angular momentum diffusion, and solver modifications. Central claims concern the practical effects of these code changes (e.g., uninterrupted evolution to core collapse) and are supported by direct comparisons to earlier independent literature rather than by any internal derivation chain. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are presented as load-bearing predictions that reduce to the paper's own inputs by construction; the work is self-contained against external benchmarks and prior results.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the correctness of numerical implementations of standard stellar structure equations and physical models drawn from prior literature, with no new free parameters, ad hoc axioms, or invented entities introduced in the described updates.

assumptions (1)
  • standard math Standard equations of stellar structure, energy transport, and nuclear burning
    The code solves these with updated numerical methods and boundary conditions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Giant Planets, Oscillations, Rotation, and Massive Stars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MQK46YRB

@misc{pith202613010319,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Giant Planets, Oscillations, Rotation, and Massive Stars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MQK46YRB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1301.0319}
}
read the original abstract

We substantially update the capabilities of the open source software package Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA), and its one-dimensional stellar evolution module, MESA Star. Improvements in MESA Star's ability to model the evolution of giant planets now extends its applicability down to masses as low as one-tenth that of Jupiter. The dramatic improvement in asteroseismology enabled by the space-based Kepler and CoRoT missions motivates our full coupling of the ADIPLS adiabatic pulsation code with MESA Star. This also motivates a numerical recasting of the Ledoux criterion that is more easily implemented when many nuclei are present at non-negligible abundances. This impacts the way in which MESA Star calculates semi-convective and thermohaline mixing. We exhibit the evolution of 3-8 Msun stars through the end of core He burning, the onset of He thermal pulses, and arrival on the white dwarf cooling sequence. We implement diffusion of angular momentum and chemical abundances that enable calculations of rotating-star models, which we compare thoroughly with earlier work. We introduce a new treatment of radiation-dominated envelopes that allows the uninterrupted evolution of massive stars to core collapse. This enables the generation of new sets of supernovae, long gamma-ray burst, and pair-instability progenitor models. We substantially modify the way in which MESA Star solves the fully coupled stellar structure and composition equations, and we show how this has improved MESA's performance scaling on multi-core processors. Updates to the modules for equation of state, opacity, nuclear reaction rates, and atmospheric boundary conditions are also provided. We describe the MESA Software Development Kit (SDK) that packages all the required components needed to form a unified and maintained build environment for MESA. [Abridged]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Showing 60 of 61 Pith papers that cite this

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 3,185 citations worldwide. See all 61 Pith citations

  1. Results from the first spectropolarimetric survey of $\gamma$ Dor pulsators

    astro-ph.SR 2026-08 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    The first spectropolarimetric survey of 47 gamma Dor pulsators finds no strong surface magnetic fields, setting upper limits of roughly 50 to 100 G and suggesting strong global fields and gamma Dor pulsation are mutua...

  2. Hyperaccreting Magnetised Neutron Stars inside Rotating Massive Envelopes: Low-Power Jets and Precursor Flares

    astro-ph.HE 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    In 2D GRMHD simulations, magnetised neutron stars hyperaccreting inside massive envelopes can halt accretion above B_surf ~2.3e13 G and launch ~1e46 erg/s precursor jets that still cannot unbind the envelope.

  3. White Dwarf Kicks via Episodic Mass Ejection from Red Giant Stars

    astro-ph.SR 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Episodic, asymmetric mass loss from red giants yields a random-walk accumulation of small kicks that explains white dwarf kick velocities and the disruption of wide binaries.

  4. A Galactic intermediate-mass stripped star with a Wolf-Rayet-like wind

    astro-ph.SR 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    WR 2-1 is the first unambiguous intermediate-mass stripped star in the Milky Way: a 3-6 solar mass, 60 kK helium-rich companion in a 5.94-day binary with a rapidly rotating O-star.

  5. A survey of ultra-compact high-state AM CVn binaries with ZTF and Gaia: New discoveries and observational constraints on Galactic space density

    astro-ph.SR 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Three new high-state AM CVn binaries are discovered, giving a local space density of about 1 to 3 per 10^8 cubic parsecs and LISA detection estimates near 36% of the Galactic population.

  6. V407 Vul: a triple star system with an AM CVn detectable by gravitational wave observatories

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    V407 Vul is a hierarchical triple: a 569-s AM CVn white-dwarf binary bound to a G-type tertiary at ~120 AU, the first 'verification triple' for LISA.

  7. Mitigating Charge Migration in JWST NIRISS Reveals That KELT-7 b is a Metal-enriched Ultra-hot Jupiter Orbiting a Young Metal-rich Star

    astro-ph.EP 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Correcting NIRISS charge migration reveals KELT-7 b as a metal-enriched (~92x solar) ultra-hot Jupiter with H2O, CO2 and TiO but no H- or clouds, orbiting a young metal-rich star.

  8. Discovery of an Inflated Hot Neptune and Its Formation from Jovian Mass Loss

    astro-ph.EP 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    TOI-2195 A b is an inflated hot Neptune that likely originated as a Jovian planet losing ~90% mass through Roche lobe overflow during EKL-driven high-eccentricity migration triggered by a wide binary companion.

  9. Unveiling the nature of barium stars. I. Asteroseismic masses and the evolutionary link between Ba dwarfs and giants

    astro-ph.SR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Asteroseismic masses average 1.29 Msun for Ba dwarfs versus 1.96 Msun for Ba giants, supporting main-sequence accretion evolution from dwarfs to giants, though models fail to match the observed [hs/ls] ratio.

  10. Extending asteroseismic magnetometry across the diverse landscape of magnetic structures

    astro-ph.SR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Gravity-wave polarization theory is extended to non-axisymmetric stellar magnetic fields, revealing avoided crossings and a new mixing threshold distinct from the magnetic-suppression threshold.

  11. Precision constraints on stellar physics from main sequence detached eclipsing binaries

    astro-ph.SR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Bayesian framework with active-learning surrogate for MESA models constrains ages and α_MLT from 38 main-sequence DEBs, recovering some α_MLT values below the solar calibration.

  12. Accretion of Primordial Black Holes in Stellar Interiors

    astro-ph.HE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Self-consistent spherical accretion simulations show cooling-enhanced growth of PBHs with radiative efficiency ~10^{-2} in the bremsstrahlung regime, yielding a critical seed mass of ~10^{-16} M_sun to consume a solar...

  13. TESS Observations of Stochastic Low-frequency Variability in Extreme Helium Stars

    astro-ph.SR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    TESS data show stochastic low-frequency variability dominates in most extreme helium stars, with characteristic timescales of 0.5-10 days correlating to stellar parameters and matching subsurface convection predictions.

  14. The Black Hole Mass Gap as a New Probe of Millicharged Particles

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Millicharged particles weaken pulsational pair-instability in massive stars, shifting the lower edge of the black hole mass gap upward and turning gravitational wave observations into a probe for particles with masses...

  15. Stable mass transfer in massive binaries leading to merging black holes

    astro-ph.SR 2025-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Stable mass transfer in massive binaries, modeled with the accreting star's altered structure, produces merging black holes matching LIGO/Virgo masses and spins.

  16. Resonant axion and dark photon production in magnetic white dwarfs

    hep-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Magnetic fields broaden the resonant conversion of photons to axions and dark photons inside magnetic white dwarfs, enabling emission where none occurred before.

  17. Obtaining Precision Constraints on Modified Gravity with Helioseismology

    astro-ph.CO 2019-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Helioseismic frequencies of 19 selected solar modes could constrain the DHOST fifth-force coupling Y to about 10^-3, far tighter than previous stellar bounds.

  18. Asteroseismic forward modelling of 36 $\beta$ Cep pulsators and inferences on their internal differential rotation

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    Forward modelling of 36 β Cep stars with second-order rotation effects shows internal rotation declining with age and common radial differential rotation, often non-monotonic, in 17 stars.

  19. On the feasibility of inverting the rotation of the solar core with mixed f/g modes

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    Six mixed f/g modes in a solar model yield OLA kernels that can measure core rotation at two radii with precision sufficient to discriminate Fuller versus Eggenberger transport scenarios.

  20. Astronomical Cardiology II: A Search For Heartbeat Stars Using APOGEE and TESS

    astro-ph.SR 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new search of APOGEE binaries with TESS light curves finds 50 heartbeat stars, including 36 new systems, and confirms that the detected fraction rises sharply with stellar temperature.

  21. A Helium-shell Burning Blue Horizontal Branch Star Produced from Common Envelope Evolution

    astro-ph.SR 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Feige 64 is a 0.35 solar mass helium-shell-burning BHB star in a 0.826-day orbit with a 1.26 solar mass white dwarf, best explained as a common-envelope remnant.

  22. Pulsation periods reveal tension between theoretical and empirical radii for classical Cepheids in eclipsing binary systems

    astro-ph.SR 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Using pulsation period instead of radius as a constraint for Cepheid evolutionary models systematically lowers the predicted radius, exposing a tension that is partially explained by a nonlinear radius increase in ful...

  23. Isochrone fitting of Galactic globular clusters - IX. Tip of the red-giant branch for 27 clusters and constraints on new particle physics

    hep-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    No anomalous energy loss is seen in the red-giant tips of 27 globular clusters, yielding g_ae < 3.8e-14 at 95% confidence, the strongest bound for axion-electron coupling below about 1 keV.

  24. The symphony of pulsations and binarity among massive stars using HERMES spectroscopy and TESS photometry

    astro-ph.SR 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An ensemble analysis of 873 O/B stars shows photometric variability in >93%, pulsations in ~82%, and evidence of binarity in at least 14%, including 30 newly discovered eclipsing binaries.

  25. The IACOB project XIX. Revisiting massive-star evolution with empirical TAMS constraints: updated models, overshoot calibration, and the population of blue supergiants

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Massive-star models require mass-dependent core overshoot (α_ov ≈ 0.18–0.45) to match the empirical TAMS, but still fail to explain the velocity dependence of the TAMS and the observed blue supergiant population.

  26. High-mass binary black hole mergers from detailed binary evolution models

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fully-conservative BH accretion is disfavored for high-mass BBH mergers; Eddington/GRRMHD accretion with kicks can match part of the LVK high-mass population but still needs another channel.

  27. Formation of rotating supergiants via stellar mergers in dense clusters: Implications for black hole natal spins

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Stellar mergers with mass ratio q≳0.3 in young clusters can produce blue-supergiant progenitors that leave black holes with dimensionless spins a≃0.5–0.8, reducing post-merger retention and hierarchical-merger rates.

  28. SN 2020bij and a Possible Slow-Rise High-Velocity Subclass of Type IIP Supernovae

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    SN 2020bij and four other Type IIP SNe with slow-rising light curves and high velocities are modeled with weak to no CSM interaction, suggesting a new subclass linked to confined CSM.

  29. Dark matter energy exchange in stars orbiting supermassive black holes

    hep-ph 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Orbit-averaged elastic DM scattering in S4714 reaches stellar luminosity at σ_χp ∼ 10^{-36} cm² (MeV–GeV) and σ_χe ∼ 5×10^{-38} cm² (sub-MeV) for a spiked profile.

  30. The forgotten bright star: Theta Eridani as a millenary stellar transient observed by Hipparchus, Ptolemy and al-Sufi

    astro-ph.SR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Theta Eridani's historical brightness is explained as a millenary common-envelope transient powered by orbital energy extraction in a previously more eccentric binary.

  31. A grid of fast-rotating, chemically-homogeneous, supernova and/or long-GRB progenitors

    astro-ph.HE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Presents a grid of 113 fast-rotating, chemically-homogeneous massive star models at Z=0.001 reaching core collapse with high angular momentum for use as supernova and GRB progenitors.

  32. Escape of Water- and Metal-enriched Atmospheres from compact Hot mini-Neptunes with CHAIN

    astro-ph.EP 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Water- and metal-rich atmospheres on compact hot mini-Neptunes lose mass more slowly than H/He cases at high enrichment levels due to enhanced cooling and higher mean molecular weight.

  33. Temperature-resolved sensitivities of $^{56}{\rm Ni}$ production to helium-burning reactions in pair-instability supernovae

    astro-ph.SR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Temperature-resolved Monte Carlo analysis of PISNe finds peak sensitivity of 56Ni production to triple-alpha and 12C(alpha,gamma)16O rates at T~2.5e8 K with opposite signs, tied to pre-carbon C/O ratio.

  34. Neutron star-companion interaction in core collapse supernovae. Population synthesis based on detailed binary evolution models

    astro-ph.SR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Population synthesis from binary evolution models predicts periodic neutron star-companion interactions in more than half of surviving hydrogen-poor core-collapse supernovae, with periods peaking at 20-50 days and las...

  35. Axion lines from nuclear de-excitations in galactic stellar populations

    hep-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    No 14.4 keV axion line from 57Fe de-excitations is seen by NuSTAR toward M87, M82, M31, or the Galactic Center, yielding |g_ann x g_aγγ| < 1.1e-22 GeV^-1 for m_a < 1e-10 eV.

  36. Nowhere left to hide: revealing realistic gravitational-wave populations in high dimensions and high resolution with PixelPop

    astro-ph.HE 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Modeling all significant correlations with the nonparametric model PixelPop recovers the true black-hole merger rate in a simulated 400-event gravitational-wave catalog, while simpler models introduce bias.

  37. Asteroseismological constraints on--and hints of--dark matter interactions

    hep-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Dark matter heat transport can erase convective cores in solar-mass stars, yielding asteroseismic constraints on dark matter-nucleon scattering and a 4 sigma hint of dark matter-electron scattering in KIC 8228742 that...

  38. Characterization of the variability of the blue supergiant HD 14134

    astro-ph.SR 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    HD 14134 is a post-main-sequence blue supergiant with a 19.2-day g-mode pulsation and wind variability that may dominate its TESS brightness changes, questioning its alpha Cyg variable classification.

  39. Effects of Rotation on 3D Core-Collapse Supernova Models for Low-Mass Progenitors

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    For a low-mass CCSN progenitor, rotation alone weakly and non-monotonically affects explosion energy and observables; only the fastest spin yields T/|W| spiral modes and spin-kick alignment, with core spin amplified by ~4000.

  40. OCCAM X. Neutron Capture Abundances with Keck/HIRES & Magellan/MIKE

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    New high-resolution spectra yield abundances for 7 neutron-capture elements in open cluster stars, revealing flat Milky Way gradients for second-peak s- and r-process species and shallower slopes for first-peak s-process.

  41. The location of the upper edge of the pair-instability supernovae black hole mass gap

    astro-ph.HE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    The upper edge of the PISN black hole mass gap shifts by up to 30 solar masses due to nuclear reaction rate uncertainties, primarily the 12C(α,γ)16O rate, while remaining robust to resolution variations unlike the lower edge.

  42. Kepler Image-Subtracted Light Curves and Variable Star Catalog of NGC 6819

    astro-ph.SR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Kepler image-subtracted photometry yields 81,498 light curves and a catalog of 87 periodic variable candidates in NGC 6819, including 26 newly discovered ones.

  43. Observing a 542-day transiting giant with large TTVs: The 2025 transit of HIP 41378 f and new constraints on the outer system

    astro-ph.EP 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    New 2025 transit timing of HIP 41378 f shows a 7-hour early arrival consistent with TTVs; N-body modeling with TRADES refines ephemerides for planets d, e, and f.

  44. The fate of Earth during the Sun's giant phases: New constraints from ab initio tidal modelling and AGB mass loss

    astro-ph.EP 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Updated ab initio tidal models predict Earth survives the Sun's giant phases, but outcomes depend strongly on AGB mass-loss rates, with L2 Pup observations as proxy indicating survival while low rates lead to engulfment.

  45. The effect of near-core mixing on rejuvenation and the asteroseismic properties of massive accretors

    astro-ph.SR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    1D models show convective boundary mixing dominates the asteroseismic imprint of accretion in massive stars, robust to semiconvection changes but drastically altered without it, with thermal relaxation as key.

  46. Oscillations of red giant stars with magnetic damping in the core. II. Mixed mode visibilities on the red-giant branch

    astro-ph.SR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Synthetic spectra show that observational biases cause dipole mode visibilities to be overestimated by up to 20 percent on the red-giant branch, while partial energy preservation under magnetic damping can produce bot...

  47. Detection horizon for the neutrino burst from the stellar helium flash

    astro-ph.SR 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    The helium flash produces a neutrino burst with a 1.7 MeV line detectable up to almost 3 pc in future facilities, but asteroseismology remains the practical probe for now.

  48. High Power Accretion in Massive Binary Systems and the Impact of Metallicity

    astro-ph.SR 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Higher-metallicity massive stars show larger accretion-driven luminosity increases despite being more extended, and flip to a cool inflated state at lower accretion rates than low-metallicity stars.

  49. Probing Heavy Axion-like Particles from Massive Stars with X-rays and Gamma Rays

    hep-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Decay photons from heavy ALPs produced in Wolf-Rayet stars can be probed by INTEGRAL SPI down to gaγ ~ 4e-11 GeV^-1 for ma ~ 10-100 keV, modestly extending existing limits.

  50. Simulation of thermal conduction by asymmetric dark matter in realistic stars and planets

    hep-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Monte Carlo simulations show the corrected Spergel and Press formalism reproduces dark matter heat transport in realistic Sun, brown dwarf, and Earth models, but with per-scenario fitted parameters.

  51. NuSTAR bounds on radiatively decaying particles from M82

    hep-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    NuSTAR's non-detection of an X-ray halo from decaying axions around M82 excludes a previously allowed window of axion-photon coupling for 30-500 keV axion masses.

  52. Dynamical formation of long-period exoplanets systems in evolving binary stars

    astro-ph.EP 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    MESA+REBOUND simulations show that stellar mass loss in a wide binary destabilizes S-type multi-planet systems and pushes surviving giants to long-period orbits.

  53. Comparative Study of Two Luminous Red Novae I. Progenitor Modeling and Dust Formation

    astro-ph.SR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Binary evolution modeling constrains donor masses of 14-23 solar masses for two luminous red novae and shows dust masses are 1-5 orders of magnitude below total ejected envelope masses.

  54. On the stellar parameter dependence of the combined Fe I and Fe II chromospheric emission-line in the wings of the Ca II K line

    astro-ph.SR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Observational analysis of 21 giant stars shows Fe I+Fe II blend emission proportional to Ca II K with matching Teff power-law exponent and a slope break in the flux ratio at log g ≈ 2.5.

  55. Shaping the horizontal branch: The role of envelope mass in the evolution of stripped core-helium-burning stars

    astro-ph.SR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    MESA models show residual hydrogen envelope mass sets effective temperature on the horizontal branch, with maximum values of 0.05-0.30 solar masses to avoid later thermally pulsing AGB evolution, plus explanations for...

  56. Millicharged Particle Constraints from Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    New upper bounds on millicharged particles (masses 10-100 keV, charges down to 5e-13) from the AGB-to-HB star ratio in globular clusters, improving prior limits by up to two orders of magnitude.

  57. On the origin of variability in $\alpha$ Cygni variable $\epsilon$ Ori (HD 37128) using TESS observations and modelling

    astro-ph.SR 2026-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Linear stability analysis and non-linear hydrodynamical simulations link the stochastic low-frequency variability of ε Ori to strange-mode instabilities that excite finite-amplitude pulsations.

  58. Diagnosing the Properties and Evolutionary Fates of Black Hole and Wolf-Rayet X-ray Binaries as Potential Gravitational Wave Sources for the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Network

    astro-ph.HE 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    MESA binary evolution simulations with revised Bondi-Hoyle accretion efficiency and observational constraints yield lower BH mass upper limits for IC 10 X-1 and NGC 300 X-1 and predict Hubble-time BBH mergers for all ...

  59. Study of photometric and spectral variability of the roAp star HD~210684

    astro-ph.SR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    Observational analysis of HD210684 yields rotational period 5.02188 d, magnetic obliquity 77°, and main-sequence age ~1.45 Gyr from photometry, LSD magnetic measurements, and MESA/GYRE modeling.

  60. Can current models predict the local black hole merger rate?

    astro-ph.HE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    Theoretical predictions for local BBH merger rates exceed observations by a factor >10 under conservative SFRD and metallicity assumptions, indicating need for revisions in stellar evolution.

See all 61 Pith citations

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

197 extracted references · 197 canonical work pages · cited by 61 Pith papers (see all)

  1. [1]

    2011, A&A, 526, A63

    Alibert, Y ., Mordasini, C., & Benz, W. 2011, A&A, 526, A63

    work page 2011

  2. [2]

    H., Alexander, D

    Allard, F., Hauschildt, P. H., Alexander, D. R., Tamanai, A., & Schweitzer, A. 2001, ApJ, 556, 357

    work page 2001

  3. [3]

    G., Serenelli, A

    Althaus, L. G., Serenelli, A. M., C´orsico, A. H., & Montgomery, M. H. 2003, A&A, 404, 593

    work page 2003

  4. [4]

    1999, Nuclear Physics A, 656, 3

    Angulo, C., et al. 1999, Nuclear Physics A, 656, 3

    work page 1999

  5. [5]

    1980, ApJ, 242, 1208

    Arcoragi, J.-P., & Fontaine, G. 1980, ApJ, 242, 1208

    work page 1980

  6. [6]

    Arnett, D., Meakin, C., & Young, P. A. 2010, ApJ, 710, 1619 B¨ohm-Vitense, E. 1958, Zeitschrift f¨ur Astrophysik, 46, 108

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    2009, in IAU Symposium, V ol

    Baglin, A., Auvergne, M., Barge, P., Deleuil, M., Michel, E., & CoRoT Exoplanet Science Team. 2009, in IAU Symposium, V ol. 253, IAU Symposium, 71–81

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    N., Basu, S., & Pinsonneault, M

    Bahcall, J. N., Basu, S., & Pinsonneault, M. H. 1998, Physics Letters B, 433, 1

    work page 1998

Show all 197 references
  1. [9]

    A., Latter, H., & Weiss, N

    Balbus, S. A., Latter, H., & Weiss, N. 2012, MNRAS, 420, 2457

    2012

  2. [10]

    A., Welsh, W

    Bass, G., Orosz, J. A., Welsh, W. F., Windmiller, G., Ames Gregg, T., Fetherolf, T., Wade, R. A., & Quinn, S. N. 2012, ArXiv e-prints

    2012

  3. [11]

    G., et al

    Beck, P. G., et al. 2012, Nature, 481, 55

    2012

  4. [12]

    A., & Allard, N

    Bergeron, P., Wesemael, F., Lamontagne, R., Fontaine, G., Saffer, R. A., & Allard, N. F. 1995, ApJ, 449, 258

    1995

  5. [13]

    Bildsten, L., Paxton, B., Moore, K., & Macias, P. J. 2012, ApJ, 744, L6

    2012

  6. [14]

    S., & Dorodnitsyn, A

    Bisnovatyi-Kogan, G. S., & Dorodnitsyn, A. V . 1999, A&A, 344, 647

    1999

  7. [15]

    1995, A&A, 297, 727 B¨ohm, K

    Bloecker, T. 1995, A&A, 297, 727 B¨ohm, K. H., & Cassinelli, J. 1971, A&A, 12, 21

    1995

  8. [16]

    2007, A&A, 462, 1031

    Bonanno, A., K¨uker, M., & Patern`o, L. 2007, A&A, 462, 1031

    2007

  9. [17]

    2009, in IAU Symposium, V ol

    Borucki, W., et al. 2009, in IAU Symposium, V ol. 253, IAU Symposium, 289–299

    2009

  10. [18]

    Boss, A. P. 2011, ApJ, 731, 74

    2011

  11. [19]

    2006, A&A, 449, 451

    Braithwaite, J. 2006, A&A, 449, 451

    2006

  12. [20]

    Braithwaite, J., & Spruit, H. C. 2004, Nature, 431, 819

    2004

  13. [21]

    2005, Phys

    Brandenburg, A., & Subramanian, K. 2005, Phys. Rep., 417, 1

    2005

  14. [22]

    D., & Tassoul, M

    Brassard, P., Fontaine, G., Wesemael, F., Kawaler, S. D., & Tassoul, M. 1991, ApJ, 367, 601

    1991

  15. [23]

    2007, MNRAS, 381, 1482

    Briquet, M., Morel, T., Thoul, A., Scuflaire, R., Miglio, A., Montalb´an, J., Dupret, M.-A., & Aerts, C. 2007, MNRAS, 381, 1482

    2007

  16. [24]

    2011, A&A, 530, A115

    Brott, I., et al. 2011, A&A, 530, A115

    2011

  17. [25]

    M., Garaud, P., & Stellmach, S

    Brown, J. M., Garaud, P., & Stellmach, S. 2013, ApJ, 768, 34

    2013

  18. [26]

    M., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Dziembowski, W

    Brown, T. M., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Dziembowski, W. A., Goode, P., Gough, D. O., & Morrow, C. A. 1989, ApJ, 343, 526

    1989

  19. [27]

    M., Gilliland, R

    Brown, T. M., Gilliland, R. L., Noyes, R. W., & Ramsey, L. W. 1991, ApJ, 368, 599

    1991

  20. [28]

    C., et al

    Calder, A. C., et al. 2007, ApJ, 656, 313

    2007

  21. [29]

    2011, A&A, 534, A140

    Cantiello, M., & Braithwaite, J. 2011, A&A, 534, A140

    2011

  22. [30]

    2010, A&A, 521, A9 14 Avaliable fromhttp://www.astro.wisc.edu/˜townsend/static.php?ref=mesasdk

    Cantiello, M., & Langer, N. 2010, A&A, 521, A9 14 Avaliable fromhttp://www.astro.wisc.edu/˜townsend/static.php?ref=mesasdk. Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA) 43

    2010

  23. [31]

    2009, A&A, 499, 279

    Cantiello, M., et al. 2009, A&A, 499, 279

    2009

  24. [32]

    K., Cunha, K., Smith, V

    Carlberg, J. K., Cunha, K., Smith, V . V ., & Majewski, S. R. 2012, ApJ, 757, 109

    2012

  25. [33]

    A., et al

    Carter, J. A., et al. 2011, Science, 331, 562

    2011

  26. [34]

    Y ., Pietrinferni, A., Catelan, M., & Salaris, M

    Cassisi, S., Potekhin, A. Y ., Pietrinferni, A., Catelan, M., & Salaris, M. 2007, ApJ, 661, 1094

    2007

  27. [35]

    2011, ApJ, 732, 25

    Chang, P., & Hui, L. 2011, ApJ, 732, 25

    2011

  28. [36]

    2005, Science, 309, 2189

    Charbonnel, C., & Talon, S. 2005, Science, 309, 2189

    2005

  29. [37]

    2007, A&A, 467, L15

    Charbonnel, C., & Zahn, J.-P. 2007, A&A, 467, L15

    2007

  30. [38]

    L., & Wheeler, J

    Chatzopoulos, E., Robinson, E. L., & Wheeler, J. C. 2012, ApJ, 755, 95

    2012

  31. [39]

    Chatzopoulos, E., & Wheeler, J. C. 2012, ApJ, 748, 42

    2012

  32. [40]

    Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., & Thompson, M. J. 1997, MNRAS, 284, 527

    1997

  33. [41]

    1996, Science, 272, 1286

    Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., et al. 1996, Science, 272, 1286

    1996

  34. [42]

    2007, A&A, 475, 1019

    Claret, A. 2007, A&A, 475, 1019

    2007

  35. [43]

    P., & Giuli, R

    Cox, J. P., & Giuli, R. T. 1968, Principles of stellar structure (New York: Gordon and Breach)

    1968

  36. [44]

    H., et al

    Cyburt, R. H., et al. 2010, ApJS, 189, 240

    2010

  37. [45]

    A., Sakstein, J., & Shaw, D

    Davis, A.-C., Lim, E. A., Sakstein, J., & Shaw, D. J. 2012, Phys. Rev. D, 85, 123006 de Bruijne, J. H. J. 2012, Ap&SS, 341, 31 de Jager, C., Nieuwenhuijzen, H., & van der Hucht, K. A. 1988, A&AS, 72, 259

    2012

  38. [46]

    2011, A&A, 535, A91

    Deheuvels, S., & Michel, E. 2011, A&A, 535, A91

    2011

  39. [47]

    2010, A&A, 515, 87

    Deheuvels, S., et al. 2010, A&A, 515, 87

    2010

  40. [48]

    Denissenkov, P. A. 2010, ApJ, 723, 563 —. 2012, ApJ, 753, L3

    2010

  41. [49]

    A., Herwig, F., Bildsten, L., & Paxton, B

    Denissenkov, P. A., Herwig, F., Bildsten, L., & Paxton, B. 2013, ApJ, 762, 8

    2013

  42. [50]

    A., & Pinsonneault, M

    Denissenkov, P. A., & Pinsonneault, M. 2007, ApJ, 655, 1157 —. 2008, ApJ, 684, 626

    2007

  43. [51]

    A., Pinsonneault, M., Terndrup, D

    Denissenkov, P. A., Pinsonneault, M., Terndrup, D. M., & Newsham, G. 2010, ApJ, 716, 1269

    2010

  44. [52]

    Dotter, A., Chaboyer, B., Jevremovi´c, D., Kostov, V ., Baron, E., & Ferguson, J. W. 2008, ApJS, 178, 89

    2008

  45. [53]

    2004, A&A, 415, 251

    Dupret, M.-A., Thoul, A., Scuflaire, R., Daszy´nska-Daszkiewicz, J., Aerts, C., Bourge, P.-O., Waelkens, C., & Noels, A. 2004, A&A, 415, 251

    2004

  46. [54]

    2008, Ap&SS, 316, 43

    Eggenberger, P., Meynet, G., Maeder, A., Hirschi, R., Charbonnel, C., Talon, S., & Ekstr¨om, S. 2008, Ap&SS, 316, 43

    2008

  47. [55]

    2012, A&A, 544, L4 Ekstr¨om, S., et al

    Eggenberger, P., Montalb´an, J., & Miglio, A. 2012, A&A, 544, L4 Ekstr¨om, S., et al. 2012, A&A, 537, A146

    2012

  48. [56]

    S., & Sofia, S

    Endal, A. S., & Sofia, S. 1976, ApJ, 210, 184 —. 1978, ApJ, 220, 279

    1976

  49. [57]

    J., et al

    Evans, C. J., et al. 2011, A&A, 530, A108

    2011

  50. [58]

    W., Alexander, D

    Ferguson, J. W., Alexander, D. R., Allard, F., Barman, T., Bodnarik, J. G., Hauschildt, P. H., Heffner-Wong, A., & Tamanai, A. 2005, ApJ, 623, 585

    2005

  51. [59]

    A., & Valenti, J

    Fischer, D. A., & Valenti, J. 2005, ApJ, 622, 1102

    2005

  52. [60]

    J., Saumon, D., Marley, M

    Fortney, J. J., Saumon, D., Marley, M. S., Lodders, K., & Freedman, R. S. 2006, ApJ, 642, 495

    2006

  53. [61]

    S., Marley, M

    Freedman, R. S., Marley, M. S., & Lodders, K. 2008, ApJS, 174, 504

    2008

  54. [62]

    B., & Abbott, D

    Friend, D. B., & Abbott, D. C. 1986, ApJ, 311, 701

    1986

  55. [63]

    2010, Molecular Physics, 108, 2265

    Frommhold, L., Abel, M., Wang, F., Gustafsson, M., Li, X., & Hunt, K. 2010, Molecular Physics, 108, 2265

    2010

  56. [64]

    M., Hirschi, R., Eggenberger, P., & Maeder, A

    Georgy, C., Ekstr¨om, S., Meynet, G., Massey, P., Levesque, E. M., Hirschi, R., Eggenberger, P., & Maeder, A. 2012, A&A, 542, A29

    2012

  57. [65]

    2011, A&A, 527, A52

    Georgy, C., Meynet, G., & Maeder, A. 2011, A&A, 527, A52

    2011

  58. [66]

    2012, ArXiv e-prints

    Giannotti, M., Wise, M., & Mohammed, A. 2012, ArXiv e-prints

    2012

  59. [67]

    E., Pols, O

    Glebbeek, E., Gaburov, E., de Mink, S. E., Pols, O. R., & Portegies Zwart, S. F. 2009, A&A, 497, 255

    2009

  60. [68]

    Gough, D. O. 1986, in Hydrodynamic and Magnetodynamic Problems in the Sun and Stars, ed. Y . Osaki, 117

    1986

  61. [69]

    1993, in Origin and Evolution of the Elements, ed

    Grevesse, N., & Noels, A. 1993, in Origin and Evolution of the Elements, ed. N. Prantzos, E. Vangioni-Flam, & M. Casse, 15–25

    1993

  62. [70]

    Grevesse, N., & Sauval, A. J. 1998, Space Sci. Rev., 85, 161

    1998

  63. [71]

    2005, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 33, 493 —

    Guillot, T. 2005, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 33, 493 —. 2010, A&A, 520, A27

    2005

  64. [72]

    1995, A&AS, 109, 109

    Guillot, T., & Morel, P. 1995, A&AS, 109, 109

    1995

  65. [73]

    1996, Solving Ordinary Differential Equations

    Hairer, E., & Wanner, G. 1996, Solving Ordinary Differential Equations. II. Stiff and Differential-Algebraic Problems, 2nd edn. (Berlin: Springer)

    1996

  66. [74]

    1997, A&A, 327, 224

    Heger, A., Jeannin, L., Langer, N., & Baraffe, I. 1997, A&A, 327, 224

    1997

  67. [75]

    1998, A&A, 334, 210 —

    Heger, A., & Langer, N. 1998, A&A, 334, 210 —. 2000, ApJ, 544, 1016

    1998

  68. [76]

    Heger, A., Langer, N., & Woosley, S. E. 2000, ApJ, 528, 368

    2000

  69. [77]

    E., & Spruit, H

    Heger, A., Woosley, S. E., & Spruit, H. C. 2005, ApJ, 626, 350

    2005

  70. [78]

    S., & Bodenheimer, P

    Henyey, L., Vardya, M. S., & Bodenheimer, P. 1965, ApJ, 142, 841

    1965

  71. [79]

    2000a, A&A, 360, 952 —

    Herwig, F. 2000a, A&A, 360, 952 —. 2000b, A&A, 360, 952 —. 2004, ApJS, 155, 651

    2004

  72. [80]

    1997, A&A, 324, L81

    Herwig, F., Bloecker, T., Schoenberner, D., & El Eid, M. 1997, A&A, 324, L81

    1997

  73. [81]

    2004, A&A, 425, 649

    Hirschi, R., Meynet, G., & Maeder, A. 2004, A&A, 425, 649

    2004

  74. [82]

    P., Perumalla, K

    Hirshman, S. P., Perumalla, K. S., Lynch, V . E., & Sanchez, R. 2010, J. Comput. Phys., 229, 6392

    2010

  75. [83]

    Hooke, R., & Jeeves, T. A. 1961, J. ACM, 8, 212

    1961

  76. [84]

    2012, ApJ, 757, 47

    Huang, X., & Cumming, A. 2012, ApJ, 757, 47

    2012

  77. [85]

    Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., & Lissauer, J. J. 2005, Icarus, 179, 415

    2005

  78. [86]

    M., & Davidson, K

    Humphreys, R. M., & Davidson, K. 1994, Publ.Astron.Soc.Pac., 106, 1025

    1994

  79. [87]

    2007, A&A, 466, 277

    Hunter, I., et al. 2007, A&A, 466, 277

    2007

  80. [88]

    1991, ApJS, 76, 55

    Iben, Jr., I. 1991, ApJS, 76, 55

    1991

  81. [89]

    A., & Rogers, F

    Iglesias, C. A., & Rogers, F. J. 1993, ApJ, 412, 752 —. 1996, ApJ, 464, 943

    1993

  82. [90]

    A., Rogers, F

    Iglesias, C. A., Rogers, F. J., & Wilson, B. G. 1992, ApJ, 397, 717

    1992

  83. [91]

    2004, A&A, 420, 625

    Imbriani, G., et al. 2004, A&A, 420, 625

    2004

  84. [92]

    M., et al

    Irwin, J. M., et al. 2011, ApJ, 742, 123

    2011

  85. [93]

    2008, ArXiv e-prints

    Ivezic, Z., et al. 2008, ArXiv e-prints

    2008

  86. [94]

    C., Salpeter, E

    Joss, P. C., Salpeter, E. E., & Ostriker, J. P. 1973, ApJ, 181, 429

    1973

  87. [95]

    2010, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol

    Kaiser, N., et al. 2010, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 7733, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series

    2010

  88. [96]

    Kawaler, S. D. 1988, ApJ, 333, 236

    1988

  89. [97]

    1980, A&A, 91, 175

    Kippenhahn, R., Ruschenplatt, G., & Thomas, H.-C. 1980, A&A, 91, 175

    1980

  90. [98]

    1970, in IAU Colloq

    Kippenhahn, R., & Thomas, H.-C. 1970, in IAU Colloq. 4: Stellar Rotation, ed. A. Slettebak, 20

    1970

  91. [99]

    Kjeldsen, H., & Bedding, T. R. 1995, A&A, 293, 87

    1995

  92. [100]

    R., & Christensen-Dalsgaard, J

    Kjeldsen, H., Bedding, T. R., & Christensen-Dalsgaard, J. 2008, ApJ, 683, L175

    2008

  93. [101]

    G., et al

    Koch, D. G., et al. 2010, ApJ, 713, L79 44 Paxton et al

    2010

  94. [102]

    2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 483, 287 K¨uker, M., R¨udiger, G., & Kitchatinov, L

    Krishnamurti, R. 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 483, 287 K¨uker, M., R¨udiger, G., & Kitchatinov, L. L. 2011, A&A, 530, A48

    2003

  95. [103]

    W., Staudt, G., Harissopulos, S., & Paradellis, T

    Kunz, R., Fey, M., Jaeger, M., Mayer, A., Hammer, J. W., Staudt, G., Harissopulos, S., & Paradellis, T. 2002, ApJ, 567, 643

    2002

  96. [104]

    1991, A&A, 252, 669

    Langer, N. 1991, A&A, 252, 669

    1991

  97. [105]

    1997, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol

    Langer, N. 1997, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 120, Luminous Blue Variables: Massive Stars in Transition, ed. A. Nota & H. Lamers, 83 —. 1998, A&A, 329, 551 —. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 107

    1997

  98. [106]

    J., & Sugimoto, D

    Langer, N., Fricke, K. J., & Sugimoto, D. 1983, A&A, 126, 207

    1983

  99. [107]

    1999, A&A, 346, L37

    Langer, N., Heger, A., Wellstein, S., & Herwig, F. 1999, A&A, 346, L37

    1999

  100. [108]

    Laughlin, G., Bodenheimer, P., & Adams, F. C. 2004, ApJ, 612, L73

    2004

  101. [109]

    M., et al

    Law, N. M., et al. 2009, PASP, 121, 1395 Lesaffre, P., Han, Z., Tout, C. A., Podsiadlowski, P., & Martin, R. G. 2006, MNRAS, 368, 187

    2009

  102. [110]

    Li, Y ., & Gong, Z. G. 1994, A&A, 289, 449

    1994

  103. [111]

    Liu, C., Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Sordo, R., Vallenari, A., Borrachero, R., Luri, X., & Sartoretti, P. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 2463

    2012

  104. [112]

    Lloyd, J. P. 2011, ApJ, 739, L49

    2011

  105. [113]

    2003, ApJ, 591, 1220

    Lodders, K. 2003, ApJ, 591, 1220

    2003

  106. [114]

    MacDonald, J., & Mullan, D. J. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 3084

    2012

  107. [115]

    1987a, A&A, 173, 247 —

    Maeder, A. 1987a, A&A, 173, 247 —. 1987b, A&A, 178, 159 —. 2009, Physics, Formation and Evolution of Rotating Stars (Berlin: Springer)

    2009

  108. [116]

    1987, A&A, 182, 243 —

    Maeder, A., & Meynet, G. 1987, A&A, 182, 243 —. 2000a, A&A, 361, 159 —. 2000b, ARA&A, 38, 143 —. 2003, A&A, 411, 543 —. 2004, A&A, 422, 225

    1987

  109. [117]

    1998, A&A, 334, 1000

    Maeder, A., & Zahn, J.-P. 1998, A&A, 334, 1000

    1998

  110. [118]

    S., Fortney, J

    Marley, M. S., Fortney, J. J., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., & Lissauer, J. J. 2007, ApJ, 655, 541

    2007

  111. [119]

    2012, ApJ, 749, 152

    Mathur, S., et al. 2012, ApJ, 749, 152

    2012

  112. [120]

    A., & Arnett, D

    Meakin, C. A., & Arnett, D. 2007, ApJ, 667, 448

    2007

  113. [121]

    2010, Phys

    Medin, Z., & Cumming, A. 2010, Phys. Rev. E, 81, 036107

    2010

  114. [122]

    S., et al

    Metcalfe, T. S., et al. 2012, ApJ, 748, L10

    2012

  115. [123]

    2011, A&A, 525, L11

    Meynet, G., Eggenberger, P., & Maeder, A. 2011, A&A, 525, L11

    2011

  116. [124]

    1997, A&A, 321, 465 —

    Meynet, G., & Maeder, A. 1997, A&A, 321, 465 —. 2000, A&A, 361, 101

    1997

  117. [125]

    1978, Stellar atmospheres /2nd edition/ (San Francisco, W

    Mihalas, D. 1978, Stellar atmospheres /2nd edition/ (San Francisco, W. H. Freeman and Co.)

    1978

  118. [126]

    J., Taylor, B

    Mohr, P. J., Taylor, B. N., & Newell, D. B. 2008, Reviews of Modern Physics, 80, 633

    2008

  119. [127]

    Monteiro, M. J. P. F. G., ed. 2009, Astrophysics and Space Science, V ol. 316, Evolution and Seismic Tools for Stellar Astrophysics (Springer)

    2009

  120. [128]

    Moravveji, E., Moya, A., & Guinan, E. F. 2012, ApJ, 749, 74

    2012

  121. [129]

    2012, A&A, 548, A10

    Mosser, B., et al. 2012, A&A, 548, A10

    2012

  122. [130]

    2009, A&A, 494, 373

    Mugrauer, M., & Neuh¨auser, R. 2009, A&A, 494, 373

    2009

  123. [131]

    1982, ApJ, 253, 798

    Nomoto, K. 1982, ApJ, 253, 798

    1982

  124. [132]

    1977, PASJ, 29, 765

    Nomoto, K., & Sugimoto, D. 1977, PASJ, 29, 765

    1977

  125. [133]

    Nugis, T., & Lamers, H. J. G. L. M. 2000, A&A, 360, 227

    2000

  126. [134]

    E., & Wu, Y

    Owen, J. E., & Wu, Y . 2013, ArXiv e-prints

    2013

  127. [135]

    P., Gayley, K

    Owocki, S. P., Gayley, K. G., & Shaviv, N. J. 2004, ApJ, 616, 525 Paczy´nski, B. 1969, Acta Astron., 19, 1 —. 1970, Acta Astron., 20, 47

    2004

  128. [136]

    Pamyatnykh, A. A. 1999, Acta Astron., 49, 119

    1999

  129. [137]

    2012, ApJ, 759, L30

    Passy, J.-C., Mac Low, M.-M., & De Marco, O. 2012, ApJ, 759, L30

    2012

  130. [138]

    2002, ApJ, 581, 654

    Patience, J., et al. 2002, ApJ, 581, 654

    2002

  131. [139]

    2010, ApJS, 192, 3

    Paxton, B., Bildsten, L., Dotter, A., Herwig, F., Lesaffre, P., & Timmes, F. 2010, ApJS, 192, 3

    2010

  132. [140]

    2005, A&A, 435, 247

    Petrovic, J., Langer, N., Yoon, S.-C., & Heger, A. 2005, A&A, 435, 247

    2005

  133. [141]

    H., Kawaler, S

    Pinsonneault, M. H., Kawaler, S. D., Sofia, S., & Demarque, P. 1989, ApJ, 338, 424

    1989

  134. [142]

    B., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., Lissauer, J

    Pollack, J. B., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., Lissauer, J. J., Podolak, M., & Greenzweig, Y . 1996, Icarus, 124, 62

    1996

  135. [143]

    Y ., & Chabrier, G

    Potekhin, A. Y ., & Chabrier, G. 2010, Contributions to Plasma Physics, 50, 82

    2010

  136. [144]

    2009, The BOBYQA algorithm for bound optimization without derivatives, Tech

    Powell, M. 2009, The BOBYQA algorithm for bound optimization without derivatives, Tech. rep., Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge

    2009

  137. [145]

    2000, At

    Rauscher, T., & Thielemann, F. 2000, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 75, 1

    2000

  138. [146]

    1975, in Problems in stellar atmospheres and envelopes., ed

    Reimers, D. 1975, in Problems in stellar atmospheres and envelopes., ed. B. Baschek, W. H. Kegel, & G. Traving (New York: Spring-Verlag), 229–256

    1975

  139. [147]

    2012, A&A, 542, A92

    Roell, T., Neuh¨auser, R., Seifahrt, A., & Mugrauer, M. 2012, A&A, 542, A92

    2012

  140. [148]

    J., & Nayfonov, A

    Rogers, F. J., & Nayfonov, A. 2002, ApJ, 576, 1064

    2002

  141. [149]

    Rohrmann, R. D. 2001, MNRAS, 323, 699

    2001

  142. [150]

    D., Althaus, L

    Rohrmann, R. D., Althaus, L. G., Garc´ıa-Berro, E., C´orsico, A. H., & Miller Bertolami, M. M. 2012, ArXiv e-prints

    2012

  143. [151]

    W., & V orontsov, S

    Roxburgh, I. W., & V orontsov, S. V . 2003, A&A, 411, 215

    2003

  144. [152]

    A., & Baliunas, S

    Ruediger, G., von Rekowski, B., Donahue, R. A., & Baliunas, S. L. 1998, ApJ, 494, 691

    1998

  145. [153]

    2005, ApJ, 633, 465

    Sato, B., et al. 2005, ApJ, 633, 465

    2005

  146. [154]

    Saumon, D., Chabrier, G., & van Horn, H. M. 1995, ApJS, 99, 713

    1995

  147. [155]

    1962, Annales d’Astrophysique, 25, 18

    Schatzman, E. 1962, Annales d’Astrophysique, 25, 18

    1962

  148. [156]

    S., Hughto, J., Horowitz, C

    Schneider, A. S., Hughto, J., Horowitz, C. J., & Berry, D. K. 2012, Phys. Rev. E, 85, 066405

    2012

  149. [157]

    1998, ApJ, 505, 390

    Schou, J., et al. 1998, ApJ, 505, 390

    1998

  150. [158]

    2010, ARA&A, 48, 631 Silva Aguirre, V ., et al

    Seager, S., & Deming, D. 2010, ARA&A, 48, 631 Silva Aguirre, V ., et al. 2013, ArXiv e-prints S¨oderlind, G., & Wang, L. 2006, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 185, 225

    2010

  151. [159]

    Spruit, H. C. 2002, A&A, 381, 923 —. 2013, A&A, 552, A76 Stancliffe, R. J. 2010, MNRAS, 403, 505 Steffen, M. 1990, A&A, 239, 443

    2002

  152. [160]

    2009, ApJ, 700, 1589

    Stello, D., et al. 2009, ApJ, 700, 1589

    2009

  153. [161]

    W., Demarque, P., & Guenther, D

    Straka, C. W., Demarque, P., & Guenther, D. B. 2005, ApJ, 629, 1075

    2005

  154. [162]

    2003, ApJ, 583, 878 Su´arez-Madrigal, A., Krumholz, M., & Ramirez-Ruiz, E

    Straniero, O., Dom´ınguez, I., Imbriani, G., & Piersanti, L. 2003, ApJ, 583, 878 Su´arez-Madrigal, A., Krumholz, M., & Ramirez-Ruiz, E. 2013, ArXiv e-prints

    2003

  155. [163]

    1981, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement, 70, 115

    Sugimoto, D., Nomoto, K., & Eriguchi, Y . 1981, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement, 70, 115

    1981

  156. [164]

    Suijs, M. P. L., Langer, N., Poelarends, A.-J., Yoon, S.-C., Heger, A., & Herwig, F. 2008, A&A, 481, L87

    2008

  157. [165]

    1980, ApJS, 43, 469 Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA) 45

    Tassoul, M. 1980, ApJS, 43, 469 Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA) 45

    1980

  158. [166]

    J., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Miesch, M

    Thompson, M. J., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Miesch, M. S., & Toomre, J. 2003, ARA&A, 41, 599

    2003

  159. [167]

    J., et al

    Thompson, M. J., et al. 1996, Science, 272, 1300

    1996

  160. [168]

    2009, MNRAS, 398, 1011

    Tian, C.-L., Deng, L.-C., & Chan, K.-L. 2009, MNRAS, 398, 1011

    2009

  161. [169]

    Timmes, F. X. 1999, ApJS, 124, 241

    1999

  162. [170]

    X., & Swesty, F

    Timmes, F. X., & Swesty, F. D. 2000, ApJS, 126, 501

    2000

  163. [171]

    2010, A&A Rev., 18, 67

    Torres, G., Andersen, J., & Gim´enez, A. 2010, A&A Rev., 18, 67

    2010

  164. [172]

    Townsend, R. H. D., Oksala, M. E., Cohen, D. H., Owocki, S. P., & ud-Doula, A. 2010, ApJ, 714, L318

    2010

  165. [173]

    M., & Bildsten, L

    Townsley, D. M., & Bildsten, L. 2004, ApJ, 600, 390

    2004

  166. [174]

    2011, ApJ, 728, L29 ud-Doula, A., & Owocki, S

    Traxler, A., Garaud, P., & Stellmach, S. 2011, ApJ, 728, L29 ud-Doula, A., & Owocki, S. P. 2002, ApJ, 576, 413

    2011

  167. [175]

    Udry, S., & Santos, N. C. 2007, ARA&A, 45, 397

    2007

  168. [176]

    Ulrich, R. K. 1972, ApJ, 172, 165

    1972

  169. [177]

    1989, Nonradial Oscillations of Stars (Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press)

    Unno, W., Osaki, Y ., Ando, H., Saio, H., & Shibahashi, H. 1989, Nonradial Oscillations of Stars (Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press)

    1989

  170. [178]

    D., Brown, E

    Ushomirsky, G., Matzner, C. D., Brown, E. F., Bildsten, L., Hilliard, V . G., & Schroeder, P. C. 1998, ApJ, 497, 253 van Saders, J. L., & Pinsonneault, M. H. 2012, ApJ, 751, 98

    1998

  171. [179]

    A., Bergbusch, P

    VandenBerg, D. A., Bergbusch, P. A., & Dowler, P. D. 2006, ApJS, 162, 375

    2006

  172. [180]

    S., de Koter, A., & Lamers, H

    Vink, J. S., de Koter, A., & Lamers, H. J. G. L. M. 2001, A&A, 369, 574 von Zeipel, H. 1924, MNRAS, 84, 665

    2001

  173. [181]

    C., Miller Bertolami, M

    Wachlin, F. C., Miller Bertolami, M. M., & Althaus, L. G. 2011, A&A, 533, A139

    2011

  174. [182]

    J., & Davis, Jr., L

    Weber, E. J., & Davis, Jr., L. 1967, ApJ, 148, 217

    1967

  175. [183]

    2001, AJ, 122, 1602

    Woo, J.-H., & Demarque, P. 2001, AJ, 122, 1602

    2001

  176. [184]

    S., Garaud, P., & Stellmach, S

    Wood, T. S., Garaud, P., & Stellmach, S. 2013, ApJ, 768, 157

    2013

  177. [185]

    Woosley, S. E. 1993, ApJ, 405, 273

    1993

  178. [186]

    E., & Heger, A

    Woosley, S. E., & Heger, A. 2006, ApJ, 637, 914

    2006

  179. [187]

    H., Fu, J

    Yang, X. H., Fu, J. N., & Zha, Q. 2012, AJ, 144, 92

    2012

  180. [188]

    2010, ApJ, 717, L62

    Yoon, S.-C., & Cantiello, M. 2010, ApJ, 717, L62

    2010

  181. [189]

    2005, A&A, 443, 643

    Yoon, S.-C., & Langer, N. 2005, A&A, 443, 643

    2005

  182. [190]

    2006, A&A, 460, 199

    Yoon, S.-C., Langer, N., & Norman, C. 2006, A&A, 460, 199

    2006

  183. [191]

    E., & Langer, N

    Yoon, S.-C., Woosley, S. E., & Langer, N. 2010, ApJ, 725, 940

    2010

  184. [192]

    G., et al

    York, D. G., et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 1579

    2000

  185. [193]

    A., Liebst, K., & Pagano, M

    Young, P. A., Liebst, K., & Pagano, M. 2012, ApJ, 755, L31

    2012

  186. [194]

    N., Barber, R

    Yurchenko, S. N., Barber, R. J., & Tennyson, J. 2011, MNRAS, 413, 1828

    2011

  187. [195]

    1992, A&A, 265, 115

    Zahn, J.-P. 1992, A&A, 265, 115

    1992

  188. [196]

    S., & Mathis, S

    Zahn, J.-P., Brun, A. S., & Mathis, S. 2007, A&A, 474, 145

    2007

  189. [197]

    S., & Salpeter, E

    Zapolsky, H. S., & Salpeter, E. E. 1969, ApJ, 158, 809

    1969

Pith tools

Reviewed May 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.